Controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroids in severe acute asthma

Dexamethasone for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroids are vital to critical asthma management. While intravenous methylprednisolone is routinely used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting, recent data supports dexamethasone as an alternative. Using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) registry, we assessed trends and variation in corticosteroid prescribing among children hospitalized for critical asthma.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study using PHIS data among children 3-17 years of age admitted for critical asthma from 2011 through 2019. Primary outcomes were corticosteroid prescribing rates by year and participating sites. Exploratory outcomes were corticosteroid-related adverse effects, rates of adjunctive pharmaceutical and respiratory interventions, mortality and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of the 49 children's hospitals assessed, 26 907 encounters were included for study. Mean dexamethasone exposure rates were 18.1 ± 2.4% where 2.4 ± 1.2% represented dexamethasone-alone prescribing. Dexamethasone alone prescribing exhibited a linear trend (annual increase of 0.5 ± 0.1% annually R² = 0.845) without correlation to cumulative site critical asthma admission rates. Compared to encounters prescribed solely methylprednisolone or a combination of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, subjects provided dexamethasone alone had reduced asthma severity indices, length of stay, and exposure rates to adjunctive asthma interventions. Adverse events were rare and the dexamethasone-alone group less frequently experienced gastritis and hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter retrospective study from 49 children's hospitals, dexamethasone prescribing rates appear increasing for pediatric critical asthma. Observed variability in corticosteroid prescribing implies a continued need for controlled prospective comparative analyses to define ideal corticosteroid regimens for pediatric critical asthma.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of two regimens of sequential systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are commonly used in the management of acute asthma. However, studies comparing various steroids in the management of acute asthma are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens - intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (MP) followed by oral MP and IV hydrocortisone (HC) followed by oral prednisolone in acute bronchial asthma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized, prospective study performed in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital in North India. A total of 94 patients with acute asthma were randomly allocated to either of the two treatment groups: Group A (n = 49) or Group B (n = 45). Patients in Group A were administered HC 200 mg IV 6-hourly until discharge from the ED, followed by oral prednisolone 0.75 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks. Patients in Group B were administered MP 125 mg IV bolus, followed by 40 mg MP IV 6-hourly until discharge, and then oral MP 0.6 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks. All clinical variables, peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) were assessed at baseline, at 1, 3 and 6 h and at every 6 h thereafter until discharge from the ED. The patients were followed-up after 2 weeks of discharge. The response to treatment was assessed by clinical and spirometric evaluation. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare the two treatment regimens.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. There was a significant improvement in PEF and FEV(1) within the groups at 2 weeks of treatment when compared to the baseline. At 2 weeks of follow-up, Group B showed significant improvement over Group A in PEF (P < 0.0001), FEV(1) (P < 0.0001) and asthma score (P = 0.034). There was a significant increase in the blood sugar value at 2 weeks in both the groups. However, the increase was greater in Group A as compared to Group B (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that in acute asthma patients, IV MP followed by oral MP is a more efficacious and safer treatment regimen than IV HC followed by oral prednisolone.

Corticosteroids for preventing relapse following acute exacerbations of asthma

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma is responsible for many emergency department (ED) visits annually. Between 12 to 16% will relapse to require additional interventions within two weeks of ED discharge. Treatment of acute asthma is based on rapid reversal of bronchospasm and reducing airway inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit of corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous) for the treatment of asthmatic patients discharged from an acute care setting (i.e. usually the emergency department) after assessment and treatment of an acute asthmatic exacerbation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles. In addition, authors of all included studies were contacted to locate unpublished studies. The most recent search was run in October 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing two types of corticosteroids (oral, intra-muscular, or inhaled) with placebo for outpatient treatment of asthmatic exacerbations in adults or children.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials involving 374 people were included. One study used intramuscular corticosteroids, five studies used oral corticosteroids. The review was split into two reviews and although the latest search yielded no additional placebo controlled trials an additional IM study was included. Significantly fewer patients in the corticosteroid group relapsed to receive additional care in the first week (Relative risk (RR) 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 0.74). This favourable effect was maintained over the first 21 days (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.89) and there were fewer subsequent hospitalizations (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.95). Patients receiving corticosteroids had less need for beta(2)-agonists (mean difference (MD) -3.3 activations/day; 95% CI -5.6 to -1.0). Changes in pulmonary function tests (SMD 0.045; 95% CI -0.47 to 0.56) and side effects (SMD 0.03; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.44) in the first 7 to 10 days, while rarely reported, showed no significant differences between the treatment groups. Statistically significant heterogeneity was identified for the side effect results; all other outcomes were homogeneous. From these results, as few as ten patients need to be treated to prevent relapse to additional care after an exacerbation of asthma.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A short course of corticosteroids following assessment for an asthma exacerbation significantly reduces the number of relapses to additional care, hospitalizations and use of short-acting beta(2)-agonist without an apparent increase in side effects. Intramuscular and oral corticosteroids are both effective.

Rapid anti-secretory effects of glucocorticoids in human airway epithelium

Glucocorticoids are anti-inflammatory molecules classically described as acting through a genomic pathway. Similar to many steroid hormones, glucocorticoids also induce rapid non-genomic responses. The present paper provides a general overview of the rapid non-genomic effects of glucocorticoids in airway and will be mainly focused on a retrospective of the authors work on rapid effects of glucocorticoids in airway epithelial cell transport. Using fluorescence microscopy, short circuit current measurements in human bronchial epithelial (16HBE14o(-)) cells, we reported rapid non-genomic effects of dexamethasone on cell signalling and ion transport. Dexamethasone (1 nM) rapidly stimulated Na(+)/H(+) exchanger activity and pH(i) regulation in 16HBE14o(-) cells. Dexamethasone also produced a rapid decrease of intracellular [Ca(2+)](i) to a new steady state concentration and inhibited the large and transient [Ca(2+)](i) increase induced by apical adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP). Dexamethasone also reduced by 1/3 the Ca(2+)-dependent Cl(-) secretion induced by apical ATP. The rapid effects of dexamethasone on intracellular pH and Ca(2+) were not affected by inhibitors of transcription, cycloheximide or by the classical glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors antagonists, RU486 and spironolactone, respectively. The rapid responses to glucocorticoid were reduced by the inhibitors of adenylated cyclase, cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2). Our results demonstrate, that dexamethasone at low concentrations, rapidly regulates intracellular pH, Ca(2+) and PKA activity and inhibits Cl(-) secretion in human bronchial epithelial cells via a non-genomic mechanism which neither involve the classical glucocorticoid nor mineralocorticoid receptor.

Randomised pragmatic comparison of UK and US treatment of acute asthma presenting to hospital

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2) agonists are accepted first line treatments for acute severe asthma, but there is no consensus on their optimum dosage and frequency of administration. American regimens include higher initial dosages of beta(2) agonists and corticosteroids than UK regimens.

METHODS

In a prospective, pragmatic, randomised, parallel group study, 170 patients of mean (SD) age 37 (12) years with acute asthma (peak expiratory flow (PEF) 212 (80) l/min) presenting to hospital received treatment with either high dose prednisolone and continuous nebulised salbutamol as recommended in the US or lower dose prednisolone and bolus nebulised salbutamol as recommended in the UK by the BTS.

RESULTS

Outcome measures were: deltaPEF at 1 hour (BTS 89 l/min, US 106 l/min, p=0.2, CI -8 to 41) and at 2 hours (BTS 49 l/min, US 101 l/min, p<0.0001, CI 28 to 77); time to discharge if admitted (BTS 4 days, US 4 days); rates of achieving discharge PEF (>60%) at 2 hours (BTS 64%, US 78%, p=0.04); time to regain control of asthma as measured by PEF >/=80% best with </=20% variability (BTS 3 days, US 4 days, p=0.6); PEF at 24 hours in patients admitted (BTS 293 l/min, US 288 l/min, p=0.8); and control of asthma in the subsequent month (no significant differences).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with higher doses of continuous nebulised salbutamol leads to a greater immediate improvement in PEF but the degree of recovery at 24 hours and speed of recovery thereafter is achieved as effectively with lower corticosteroid doses as recommended in the British guidelines.

Intravenous versus oral corticosteroids for treatment of acute asthma exacerbations

OBJECTIVE

To compare the duration of hospitalization of patients treated with either oral or intravenous corticosteroids for an acute asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on a random sample of inpatients. Patients were included with the following: a discharge diagnosis of an acute asthma exacerbation, a past medical history significant for asthma, age between 16 and 60 years, and treatment with either oral or intravenous corticosteroids at the time of admission. Exclusion criteria included: patients receiving chronic prednisone therapy, a past medical history significant for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, an admission to the intensive care unit, or a consistent smoking habit of at least 1 pack daily. Length of hospitalization was the primary outcome measured. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour peak expiratory flow rate, 24-hour pulse oximetry (pO(2)), and amount of beta-agonist and ipratropium used.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included in the final data analysis. Patients were grouped by route of corticosteroid administration (intravenous or oral). No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups for race, gender, age, height, weight, admission peak expiratory flow rate, admission pO(2), or types of asthma medications used prior to admission. No significant differences were demonstrated in any of the outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the intravenous and oral corticosteroid groups demonstrated similar clinical outcomes and lengths of hospitalization in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations. These results support the initial use of oral corticosteroids for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in adult patients admitted to a general medical service.

Treatment of acute asthma. A new look at the old and at the new

beta-Agonists remain the mainstay of therapy for acute asthma and, for most patients, standard doses are acceptable. Although the onset of action of systemic steroids is still not clear, steroids promote recovery and should be given to patients with acute illness. Intravenous magnesium sulfate appears to improve pulmonary function in the most severely ill patients but is not useful in patients with more moderate episodes. Ipratropium bromide is a weak bronchodilator that still needs to be tested as an adjunct to standard treatment regimens before its role in adults with asthma can be determined; given its ease of use and favorable safety profile it could be considered for patients with more severe acute illness. Aminophylline has not been found by most studies to improve outcomes and the narrow therapeutic range and unfavorable safety profile relegate it to a last-line agent or no use at all. Helium-oxygen mixtures currently have no role in moderately ill patients but have a theoretical advantage as a temporizing measure in severely ill patients. Drugs used in the management of chronic asthma, such as inhaled steroids and leukotriene-modifying agents, are making their way into the acute treatment arena, and other newly developed specific mediator inhibitors or blockers deserve attention. The use of isomers of beta-agonists is another area that is attracting attention and study. Systemic steroids are used to prevent relapse after emergency department discharge and the addition of other agents such as leukotriene-modifying agents or inhaled steroids may further prevent the need for urgent visits or hospitalization. The search for optimal treatment strategies for acutely ill patients is challenging and exciting and, with more attention and resources being devoted to this area, newer treatments will be found that will eventually have a greater impact on the high morbidity associated with acute asthma.

Corticosteroids for acute severe asthma in hospitalised patients

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are currently used routinely in the management of acute severe asthma. The optimal dose and route of administration continues to be debated. Some investigators have reported a greater benefit of higher doses of corticosteroids in the management of severe asthma, while others have not.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher doses of systemic corticosteroids (oral, intravenous or intramuscular) are more effective than lower doses in the management of patients with acute severe asthma requiring hospital admission.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected for inclusion in the review if they met the following broad inclusion criteria: described as randomised controlled trials, included patients with acute severe asthma, compared different doses of corticosteroids (any route) in 2 or more treatment arms, and had a minimum period of follow up of 24 hours. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and disagreement was resolved by third party adjudication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed as weighted mean differences (WMD) for primary pulmonary function outcomes using a fixed effects model. For the purposes of the review, three broad categories of corticosteroid dose (equivalent dose of methylprednisolone in 24 hours) were defined in advance: low dose (< or = 80 mg), medium dose (> 80 mg and < or = 360 mg) and high dose (> 360 mg). There were thus 3 main comparison groups: low versus medium dose, medium versus high dose and low versus high dose.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were included; a total of 344 adult patients have been studied (96 with low dose, 85 with medium dose and 163 with high dose corticosteroids). Only 6 trials provided sufficient data for the meta-analysis. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences detected in % predicted FEV1 among comparison groups after 24, 48 or 72 hours. At 48 hours, the weighted mean difference was -3.3% predicted (95% confidence interval -12.4 to + 5.8) for the low vs medium dose comparison, -1. 9% predicted (95% CI -8.1 to + 4.3) for the medium vs high dose comparison and + 0.5% predicted (95% CI - 7.8 to + 8.8) for the low vs high dose comparison. There appeared to be no significant differences in side effects or rates of respiratory failure among the varying doses of corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

No differences were identified among the different doses of corticosteroids in acute asthma requiring hospital admission. Low dose corticosteroids (< or = 80 mg/day of methylprednisolone or < or = 400 mg/day of hydrocortisone) appear to be adequate in the initial management of these adult patients. Higher doses do not appear to offer a therapeutic advantage.

Corticosteroids for preventing relapse following acute exacerbations of asthma

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma is responsible for many emergency department visits annually. Between 12-16% will relapse to require additional interventions within two weeks of ED discharge. Treatment of acute asthma is based on rapid reversal of bronchospasm and reducing airway inflammation and this review examines the evidence for using systemic corticosteroids to improve outcomes after discharge from the ED.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit of corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous) for the treatment of asthmatic patients discharged from an acute care setting (i.e. usually the emergency department) after assessment and treatment of an acute asthmatic exacerbation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register was searched using the terms: a) Asthma OR Wheez* b) Glucocorticoid OR Steroid* AND c) Exacerbat* OR Relapse* OR Emerg*. In addition, authors of all included studies were contacted to determine if unpublished studies which met the inclusion criteria were available. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched for additional citations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomized controlled trials were eligible for selection. Studies were included in this review if they dealt with the outpatient treatment of asthmatic exacerbations using glucocorticoids at discharge and reported either relapse rate or PFTs. Two independent reviewers first identified potentially relevant studies and then selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers. Agreement was assessed using kappa (k) statistics.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers; authors were contacted to verify the extracted data and clarify missing information. When author contact was unsuccessful, missing data were estimated from graphs where possible. Sensitivity, sub-group and overall analyses were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager.

MAIN RESULTS

A search that yielded 229 references identified 169 (73%) original publications. Reviewers identified 8 studies for potential inclusion (k =0.76); 18 references were added by searching publication reference lists and contact with authors. Of these 26 articles, a total of 7 were included in the overview. Two studies used intramuscular corticosteroids, five studies used oral corticosteroids. Significantly fewer patients in the corticosteroid group relapsed to receive additional care in the first week (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17, 0.73). This favourable effect was maintained over the first 21 days (OR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.82). Patients receiving corticosteroids had less need for beta-agonists (weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.3 activations/day; 95% CI: -5.5, -1.0). Changes in pulmonary function tests (SMD 0.045; 95% CI: -0.47, 0.56) and side effects (SMD 0.03; 95% CI : -0.38, 0.44) in the first 7-10 days, while rarely reported, showed no differences between the treatment groups. Statistically significant heterogeneity was identified for the side effect results; all other outcomes were homogeneous. It appears that IM corticosteroids are similarly efficacious to a 7-10 day tapering course of oral agents. From these results, as few as 13 patients need to be treated to prevent relapse to additional care after an exacerbation of asthma.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

A short course of corticosteroids following assessment for an acute exacerbation of asthma significantly reduces the number of relapses to additional care and decreases beta-agonist use without an apparent increase in side effects. Intramuscular corticosteroids appear as effective as oral agents.

Corticosteroids in the emergency department therapy of acute adult asthma: an evidence-based evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature to determine the benefits of corticosteroids (CCSs) (oral, IM, IV, or inhaled) in the treatment of adult patients with acute asthma presenting at an acute-care setting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following terms: (1) Asthma OR Wheez, AND (2) Glucocorticoids OR Steroids, AND (3) Acute OR Emerg. Other sources were the CURRENT CONTENTS database, review articles, reference sections of located studies, and a manual search of the top 15 journals for respiratory and emergency medicine.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients were selected for the study by the following criteria: (1) English language; (2) adult patients with asthma whose acute exacerbations were the primary reason for assessment; (3) involvement in randomized, controlled trials conducted in an emergency care setting; (4) patients had participated in a study investigating a primary research question involving treatment with CCSs; and (5) outcomes based on results of pulmonary function tests and on hospital admission rates.

RESULTS

At the 3-h assessment, only high doses of inhaled CCSs significantly improved pulmonary function compared with placebo (effect size [ES], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.97). On the other hand, after receiving IV CCSs, patients required at least 6 to 24 h to show moderate but nonsignificant improvements of pulmonary function (6-h ES, 0.44 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.89]; 12-h ES, 0.54 [95% CI, -0.08 to 1.17]; and 24-h ES, 0.53 [95% CI, -0.39 to 1.45]). The data from the six studies that we used to pool information on admission rate outcome showed a 32% reduction in favor of the use of IV CCSs (relative risk [RR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99]; number needed to treat, 12.5 [95% CI, 7.1 to 50]). However, the pooled effect of the three high-quality studies showed no difference between groups (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.18). Oral CCSs provided a similarly beneficial effect on pulmonary function when compared with parenteral administration (ES, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.31. Finally, the results showed a nonsignificant favorable trend toward improved outcome with medium or high doses of CCSs.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence-based evaluation suggests that the administration of parenteral CCSs to the patient on arrival at the emergency department (ED) neither improves airflow obstruction nor reduces the need for hospitalization. Parenteral CCSs probably require >6 to 24 h to begin to act. Comprehensible conclusions about admission rates in the ED setting are difficult to make. At the 3-h assessment, only high doses of inhaled CCSs (in one study) significantly improved pulmonary function compared with placebo. IV and oral CCSs appear to have equivalent effects, and there is a tendency toward improvement in pulmonary function with medium or high doses.

Salbutamol treatment of acute severe asthma in the ED: MDI versus hand-held nebulizer

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of salbutamol delivered by either metered-dose inhaler plus spacer (MDI-spacer) or by wet nebulization (NEB), and to determine the relationships between physiologic responses and plasma salbutamol concentrations. Asthmatic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute severe asthma (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] less than 50% of predicted) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The MDI-spacer group received salbutamol, delivered via MDI into a spacer device, in four puffs actuated in rapid succession at 10-minute intervals (2.4 mg/h). The NEB group was treated with nebulized salbutamol, 1.5 mg, via nebulizer at 15-minute intervals (6 mg/h). Doses were calculated on the basis of the percentage of total dose that reaches the lower airway with both methods. The protocol involved 3 hours of this treatment. Mean peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and FEV1 improved significantly over baseline values for both groups (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences between both groups for PEFR and FEV1 at any point studied. The examination of the relationships between cumulative dose of salbutamol and change in FEV1 showed a significant linear relationship (P=.01) for both methods (MDI r=.97; NEB r=.97). The regression equations showed that for every 1 mg of salbutamol by MDI-spacer, 2.5 mg are needed from nebulization to have equal therapeutic response. At the end of treatment, the salbutamol plasma levels were 10.1+/-1.6 ng/ml for the MDI-spacer group and 14.4+/-2.3 ng/ml for the NEB group (P=.0003). Both groups showed a nonsignificant heart rate decrease. A significant group-by-time interaction means that differences between groups increased with time (P=.04). Additionally, the NEB group presented a higher incidence of tremor (P=.03) and anxiety (P=.04), reflecting larger systemic absorption of salbutamol. These data indicate that when doses used are calculated on the basis of the percentage of total drug that reaches the lower airway, there was equivalent bronchodilatation after salbutamol administered by either MDI-spacer or nebulization in patients with acute severe asthma. However, nebulizer therapy produced greater side effects related to the increase in salbutamol absorption and higher plasma level.

Early parenteral corticosteroid administration in acute asthma

To test the hypothesis that early parenteral corticosteroid administration may be associated with a rapid improvement in airflow obstruction in adult asthmatic patients, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was carried out. Forty-five adult asthmatic patients, with initial peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) of < 200 L/sec received an intravenous bolus of either 125 mg methylprednisolone (MP) or normal saline before any other emergency department treatments. This was immediately followed by 3 aerosol treatments of 2.5 mg of albuterol separated by 20-minute intervals. PEFRs and heart rates were measured over a 1-hour time frame. There was not a significantly higher rate of increase of PEFR in the MP group compared with the saline group. Similarly, the rate of increase in percent PEFR showed a trend to being higher in the saline group (P = .061). There was no significant difference in the proportion of hospitalizations and side effects between the two groups. Adjustment for other variables did not result in a model showing an enhanced PEFR improvement with MP treatment. This study does not support the concept that corticosteroid treatment effects are beneficial within the first hour after administration. Further studies of rapid-acting modalities to enhance bronchodilation are needed in treating acute asthmatics.

Steroid therapy in obstructive airway diseases

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two common illnesses that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Steroids are widely used in both conditions. They act through steroid or glucocorticoid receptors (GR) causing up or down regulation of protein synthesis resulting in an increase in lipocortin 1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors, and decreased levels and activities of cytokines or cytokine receptors, which reduces the inflammatory process in the airways and decreases bronchial hyperreactivity. Consequently symptoms of airway obstruction are alleviated and lung function is improved. In asthma, steroids have been convincingly shown to be effective in the treatment of both acute exacerbations and chronic condition. In COPD, however, only a subset of patients seem to respond favourably to steroid therapy. Therapeutic trials are therefore recommended before committing to a long-term treatment in order to determine this subset of patients, as no markers of steroid responsiveness can be identified. The inhaled steroids currently available have a good safety profile with significant side effects occurring only occasionally. Such side effects are usually confined to the oropharynx, causing local irritation, candidiasis and dysphonia, which can be easily overcome. Biochemical abnormalities involving bone, adrenal, carbohydrate and lipid profiles have been noted with high doses of inhaled steroids; however, these have no significant clinical effects.

The effects of combined intravenous and inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for the emergency treatment of acute asthma. The Asthma ED Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in conjunction with IV steroids with that of IV steroids alone in the emergency treatment for acute asthma.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted on 60 ED patients presenting with acute asthma. All patients received nebulized salbutamol, and IV methylprednisolone, 80 mg at baseline and 40 mg at 6 hours. In addition to the above therapy, the experimental group received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 7 mg over 8 hours via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) attached to a holding chamber, while the control group received a placebo administered in the same fashion. Patients were treated on the protocol for 12 hours with the primary outcome measure being the change in % predicted FEV1.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients, 30 were randomized to BDP (age: 42 +/- 16 years; FEV1: 0.97 +/- 0.42 L) and 30 were randomized to placebo (age: 37 +/- 18 years; FEV1: 0.98 +/- 0.35 L). Spirometry and dyspnea measured by the Borg Scale improved significantly in both groups compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Changes in spirometry measures, dyspnea, and vital signs did not differ between treatment groups over the 12 hours of study (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Inhaled BDP added to the standard regimen of IV methylprednisolone, and beta-agonist did not further improve flow rates or dyspnea scores measured for up to 12 hours after presentation to the ED.

A comparison of nebulized budesonide with oral prednisolone in the treatment of exacerbations of obstructive pulmonary disease

Nebulized corticosteroids in acute bronchospasm may offer topical anti-inflammatory activity while minimizing undesirable systemic effects. We compared the side-effect profile of nebulized budesonide (2 mg twice daily) with that of oral prednisolone (30 mg once daily) in a randomized parallel-group study of 19 adults with severe acute airway obstruction. Over the 5 days of the study, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased from 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7) to 2.1 (95% CI, 0.7) L in the group that received oral corticosteroids compared with 1.9 (95% CI, 0.7) to 2.0 (95% CI, 0.7) L in the group that received nebulized corticosteroid. All biochemical variables were similar at day 1. Comparison of budesonide treatment with prednisolone on day 5 showed that urinary corticosteroid metabolites were significantly higher (2012 [95% CI, 812] compared with 1079 [95% CI, 346] mg/24 hr [p < 0.05]), urinary androgen metabolites were not different, serum osteocalcin was elevated (2.3 [95% CI, 1.4] compared with 0.6 [95% CI, 0.6] ng/ml [p < 0.05]), and 24-hour urinary calcium to creatinine ratios were lower (0.28 [95% CI, 0.1] compared with 0.53 [95% CI, 0.2]), whereas urinary hydroxyproline to creatinine ratios were similar. The biochemical markers associated with corticosteroid side effects improve in patients treated with nebulized corticosteroids compared with patients who receive conventional treatment.

Guidelines for the emergency management of asthma in adults. CAEP/CTS Asthma Advisory Committee. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and the Canadian Thoracic Society

OBJECTIVE

To develop a set of comprehensive, standardized evidence-based guidelines for the assessment and treatment of acute asthma in adults in the emergency setting.

OPTIONS

The use of medications was evaluated by class, dose, route, onset of action and optimal mode of delivery. The use of objective measurements and clinical features to assess response to therapy were evaluated in relation to the decision to admit or discharge the patient or arrange for follow-up care.

OUTCOMES

Control of symptoms and disease reflected in hospital admission rates, frequency of treatment failures following discharge, resolution of symptoms and improvement of spirometric test results.

EVIDENCE

Previous guidelines, articles retrieved through a search of MEDLINE, emergency medical abstracts and information from members of the expert panel were reviewed by members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) and the Canadian Thoracic Society. Where evidence was not available, consensus was reached by the expert panel. The resulting guidelines were reviewed by members of the parent organizations.

VALUES

The evidence-based methods and values of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination were used.

BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS

As many as 80% of the approximate 400 deaths from asthma each year in Canada are felt to be preventable. The use of guidelines, aggressive emergency management and consistent use of available options at discharge are expected to decrease the rates of unnecessary hospital admissions and return visits to emergency departments because of treatment failures. Substantial decreases in costs are expected from the use of less expensive drugs, or drug delivery systems, fewer hospital admissions and earlier return to full activity after discharge.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Beta2-agonists are the first-line therapy for the management of acute asthma in the emergency department (grade A recommendation). Bronchodilators should be administered by the inhaled route and titrated using objective and clinical measures of airflow limitation (grade A). Metered-dose inhalers are preferred to wet nebulizers, and a chamber (spacer device) is recommended for severe asthma (grade A). Anticholinergic therapy should be added to beta 2 agonist therapy in severe and life-threatening cases and may be considered in cases of mild to moderate asthma (grade A). Aminophylline is not recommended for use in the first 4 hours of therapy (grade A). Ketamine and succinylcholine are recommended for rapid sequence intubation in life-threatening cases (grade B). Adrenaline (administered subcutaneously or intravenously), salbutamol (administered intravenously) and anesthetics (inhaled) are recommended as alternatives to conventional therapy in unresponsive life-threatening cases (grade B). Severity of airflow limitation should be determined according to the forced expiratory volume at 1 second or the peak expiratory flow rate, or both, before and after treatment and at discharge (grade A). Consideration for discharge should be based on both spirometric test results and assessment of clinical risk factors for relapse (grade A). All patients should be considered candidates for systemic corticosteroid therapy at discharge (grade A). Those requiring corticosteroid therapy should be given 30 to 60 mg of prednisone orally (or equivalent) per day for 7 to 14 days; no tapering is required (grade A). Inhaled corticosteroids are an integral component of therapy and should be prescribed for all patients receiving oral corticosteroid therapy at discharge (grade A). Patients should be given a discharge treatment plan and clear instructions for follow-up care (grade C).

VALIDATION

The guidelines share the same principles of those from the British Thoracic Society and the National Institutes of Health. Two specific validation initiatives have been undertaken: (a) several Canadian centres have been involved in the collection of comprehensive administrative data to assess compliance and outcome measures and (b) a survey of Canadian emergency physicians conducted to gather baseline informaton of treatment patterns, was conducted before development of the guidelines and will be repeated to re-evaluate emergency management of asthma.

A randomized comparison of 100-mg vs 500-mg dose of methylprednisolone in the treatment of acute asthma

There have been conflicting reports comparing the effects of various doses of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma. The purpose of this study was to compare 100 mg with 500 mg of methylprednisolone in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma. We studied 150 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma. After baseline pulmonary function testing, patients were treated with oxygen and hourly administration of aerosolized albuterol. Patients were randomized to receive either 100 or 500 mg of methylprednisolone intravenously. Spirometry was repeated at 3 h, and again at 5 h for those patients whose dyspnea had not resolved after 3 h. There was no difference in the FEV1 between the 500-mg and 100-mg dose groups either before treatment (38.0% vs 32.6% of predicted normal) or after treatment (55.3% vs 51.9% of predicted normal). There was no difference in the percentage improvement in FEV1 with treatment between the 500-mg and 100-mg dose groups (65.0% vs 71.2%). Twenty-five percent of the patients in the 500-mg dose group were admitted to the hospital compared with 28% of patients in the 100-mg dose group (not significant). We conclude that the administration of a 500-mg dose of methylprednisolone offers no advantages over a 100-mg dose in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma.

Early administration of hydrocortisone in the emergency room treatment of acute asthma: a controlled clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether early administration of a single dose of intravenous hydrocortisone (500 mg) modified the need for hospitalization and duration of treatment, and improve pulmonary function assessed by subjective and objective criteria of acute asthma patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

The emergency room (ER) of a large, urban hospital with primary and referral care responsibilities.

PATIENTS

Ninety-eight patients from 18 to 50 years of age with acute bronchial asthma, with a PEFR and FEV1 in the first second below 50% of predicted value (FEV1 mean % of predicted = 27.8 +/- 10.0) and without history of chronic cough or other medical disease.

INTERVENTIONS

The corticosteroid group received 500 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone whereas the control group received intravenous normal saline immediately after arrival to the ER. Additional treatment included salbutamol delivered with metered-dose inhaler into a spacer device (Volumatic), in four puffs actuated in rapid succession (100 micrograms per actuation), at 10-min intervals. The final mean dose was 5.7 mg for the steroid group and 5.6 mg for the control one (P = 0.86). Hospitalization was mandatory if total treatment time was greater than 6 h.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Age, sex, PEFR, FEV1, FVC, symptom index, and corticosteroids use were similar in both groups. FEV1 expressed as mean % of predicted was 54.6 +/- 17.3% in the control group and 54.6 +/- 17.4% in the steroid group (P = 0.75). Duration of ER treatment was 2.22 +/- 1.75 h in the corticosteroid group and 2.24 +/- 1.70 h in the control group (P = 0.81). The hospital admission rate was 10.2% for the corticosteroid group and 8.16% for the control group. There were no differences between the groups when patients admitted or discharged were examined separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of corticosteroids does not modify outcome of ER treatment of asthma, and does not improve pulmonary function in the first 6 h of treatment. In accord with this, administration of corticosteroids to these patients could be delayed by several hours without modifying clinical outcome. When an aggressive beta-agonist bronchodilator regimen is used, it obviates the need for steroids in this early stage of treatment.