DNA Sequence-Dependent Binding of Linker Histone gH1 Regulates Nucleosome Conformations

Sequence-dependent binding between DNA and proteins in chromatin is an essential part of gene expression. Linker histone H1 is an important protein in the regulation of chromatin compartmentalization and compaction, and its binding with the nucleosome is sensitive to the DNA sequence. Although the interactions of H1 and DNA have been widely investigated, the mechanism of nucleosome conformation changes induced by the DNA-sequence-dependent binding with gH1 (globular H1.0) remains largely unclear at the atomic level. In the present molecular dynamics simulations, both linker and dyad DNAs were mutated to investigate the conformational changes of the nucleosome induced by the sequence-dependent binding of gH1 based on the on-dyad binding mode. Our results indicate that gH1 is insensitive to the DNA sequence of the dyad DNA but presents an apparent preference to linker DNA with an AT-rich sequence. Moreover, this specific binding induces the entry/exit region of a nucleosome to a tight conformation and regulates the accessibility of core histones. Considering that the entry/exit region of the nucleosome is a crucial binding site for many functional proteins related to gene expression, the conformational change at this region could represent an important gene regulation signal.

Towards understanding the Regulation of Histone H1 Somatic Subtypes with OMICs

Histone H1 is involved in the regulation of chromatin higher-order structure and compaction. In humans, histone H1 is a multigene family with seven subtypes differentially expressed in somatic cells. Which are the regulatory mechanisms that determine the variability of the H1 complement is a long-standing biological question regarding histone H1. We have used a new approach based on the integration of OMICs data to address this issue. We have examined the 3D-chromatin structure, the binding of transcription factors (TFs), and the expression of somatic H1 genes in human cell lines, using data from public repositories, such as ENCODE. Analysis of Hi-C, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq data, have revealed that transcriptional control has a greater impact on H1 regulation than previously thought. Somatic H1 genes located in topologically associated domains (TADs) show higher expression than in boundary regions. H1 genes are targeted by a variable number of transcription factors including cell cycle-related TFs, and tissue-specific TFs, suggesting a fine-tuned, subtype-specific transcriptional control. We describe, for the first time, that all H1 somatic subtypes are under transcriptional co-regulation. The replication-independent subtypes, which are encoded in different chromosomes isolated from other histone genes, are also co-regulated with the rest of the somatic H1 genes, indicating that transcriptional co-regulation extends beyond the histone cluster. Transcriptional control and transcriptional co-regulation explain, at least in part, the variability of H1 complement, the fluctuations of H1 subtypes during development, and also the compensatory effects observed, in model systems, after perturbation of one or more H1 subtypes.

Histone H1 Post-Translational Modifications: Update and Future Perspectives

Histone H1 is the most variable histone and its role at the epigenetic level is less characterized than that of core histones. In vertebrates, H1 is a multigene family, which can encode up to 11 subtypes. The H1 subtype composition is different among cell types during the cell cycle and differentiation. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has added a new layer of complexity with the identification of a large number of post-translational modifications (PTMs) in H1. In this review, we summarize histone H1 PTMs from lower eukaryotes to humans, with a particular focus on mammalian PTMs. Special emphasis is made on PTMs, whose molecular function has been described. Post-translational modifications in H1 have been associated with the regulation of chromatin structure during the cell cycle as well as transcriptional activation, DNA damage response, and cellular differentiation. Additionally, PTMs in histone H1 that have been linked to diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, and viral infection are examined. Future perspectives and challenges in the profiling of histone H1 PTMs are also discussed.

WHSC1 monomethylates histone H1 and induces stem-cell like features in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a malignancy with poor outcomes, thus novel therapies are urgently needed. We recently showed that WHSC1 is necessary for the viability of SCCHN cells through H3K36 di-methylation. Here, we report the identification of its novel substrate, histone H1, and that WHSC1-mediated H1.4K85 mono-methylation may enhance stemness features in SCCHN cells. To identify proteins interacting with WHSC1 in SCCHN cells, WHSC1 immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry identified H1 as a WHSC1-interacting candidate. In vitro methyltransferase assays showed that WHSC1 mono-methylates H1 at K85. We generated an H1K85 mono-methylation-specific antibody and confirmed that this methylation occurs in vivo. Sphere formation assays using SCC-35 cells stably expressing either wild-type (FLAG-H1.4-WT) or mutated (FLAG-H1.4K85A) vector with lysine 85 to alanine substitution which is not methylated, indicated a higher number of spheres in SCC-35 cells expressing the wild type than those with the mutant vector. SCC-35 cells expressing the wild type H1.4 proliferated faster than those expressing the mutated vector. RNA sequencing, RT-PCR and Western blotting of the FLAG-H1.4-WT or FLAG-H1.4K85A SCC-35 cells revealed that OCT4 levels were higher in wild type compared to mutant cells. These results were reproduced in SCC-35 cells genetically modified with CRISPR to express H1.4K85R. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that FLAG-H1.4K85A had decreased occupancy in the OCT4 gene compared to FLAG-H1.4-WT. This study supports that WHSC1 mono-methylates H1.4 at K85, it induces transcriptional activation of OCT4 and stemness features in SCCHN cells, providing rationale to target H1.4K85 mono-methylation through WHSC1 in SCCHN.

FACT complex is required for DNA demethylation at heterochromatin during reproduction in Arabidopsis

The DEMETER (DME) DNA glycosylase catalyzes genome-wide DNA demethylation and is required for endosperm genomic imprinting and embryo viability. Targets of DME-mediated DNA demethylation reside in small, euchromatic, AT-rich transposons and at the boundaries of large transposons, but how DME interacts with these diverse chromatin states is unknown. The STRUCTURE SPECIFIC RECOGNITION PROTEIN 1 (SSRP1) subunit of the chromatin remodeler FACT (facilitates chromatin transactions), was previously shown to be involved in the DME-dependent regulation of genomic imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm. Therefore, to investigate the interaction between DME and chromatin, we focused on the activity of the two FACT subunits, SSRP1 and SUPPRESSOR of TY16 (SPT16), during reproduction in Arabidopsis We found that FACT colocalizes with nuclear DME in vivo, and that DME has two classes of target sites, the first being euchromatic and accessible to DME, but the second, representing over half of DME targets, requiring the action of FACT for DME-mediated DNA demethylation genome-wide. Our results show that the FACT-dependent DME targets are GC-rich heterochromatin domains with high nucleosome occupancy enriched with H3K9me2 and H3K27me1. Further, we demonstrate that heterochromatin-associated linker histone H1 specifically mediates the requirement for FACT at a subset of DME-target loci. Overall, our results demonstrate that FACT is required for DME targeting by facilitating its access to heterochromatin.

Using a model comparison approach to describe the assembly pathway for histone H1

Histones H1 or linker histones are highly dynamic proteins that diffuse throughout the cell nucleus and associate with chromatin (DNA and associated proteins). This binding interaction of histone H1 with the chromatin is thought to regulate chromatin organization and DNA accessibility to transcription factors and has been proven to involve a kinetic process characterized by a population that associates weakly with chromatin and rapidly dissociates and another population that resides at a binding site for up to several minutes before dissociating. When considering differences between these two classes of interactions in a mathematical model for the purpose of describing and quantifying the dynamics of histone H1, it becomes apparent that there could be several assembly pathways that explain the kinetic data obtained in living cells. In this work, we model these different pathways using systems of reaction-diffusion equations and carry out a model comparison analysis using FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) experimental data from different histone H1 variants to determine the most feasible mechanism to explain histone H1 binding to chromatin. The analysis favors four different chromatin assembly pathways for histone H1 which share common features and provide meaningful biological information on histone H1 dynamics. We show, using perturbation analysis, that the explicit consideration of high- and low-affinity associations of histone H1 with chromatin in the favored assembly pathways improves the interpretation of histone H1 experimental FRAP data. To illustrate the results, we use one of the favored models to assess the kinetic changes of histone H1 after core histone hyperacetylation, and conclude that this post-transcriptional modification does not affect significantly the transition of histone H1 from a weakly bound state to a tightly bound state.

Trichostatin A decreases the levels of MeCP2 expression and phosphorylation and increases its chromatin binding affinity

MeCP2 binds to methylated DNA in a chromatin context and has an important role in cancer and brain development and function. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are currently being used to palliate many cancer and neurological disorders. Yet, the molecular mechanisms involved are not well known for the most part and, in particular, the relationship between histone acetylation and MeCP2 is not well understood. In this paper, we study the effect of the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) on MeCP2, a protein whose dysregulation plays an important role in these diseases. We find that treatment of cells with TSA decreases the phosphorylation state of this protein and appears to result in a higher MeCP2 chromatin binding affinity. Yet, the binding dynamics with which the protein binds to DNA appear not to be significantly affected despite the chromatin reorganization resulting from the high levels of acetylation. HDAC inhibition also results in an overall decrease in MeCP2 levels of different cell lines. Moreover, we show that miR132 increases upon TSA treatment, and is one of the players involved in the observed downregulation of MeCP2.

DDM1 and Lsh remodelers allow methylation of DNA wrapped in nucleosomes

Cytosine methylation regulates essential genome functions across eukaryotes, but the fundamental question of whether nucleosomal or naked DNA is the preferred substrate of plant and animal methyltransferases remains unresolved. Here, we show that genetic inactivation of a single DDM1/Lsh family nucleosome remodeler biases methylation toward inter-nucleosomal linker DNA in Arabidopsis thaliana and mouse. We find that DDM1 enables methylation of DNA bound to the nucleosome, suggesting that nucleosome-free DNA is the preferred substrate of eukaryotic methyltransferases in vivo. Furthermore, we show that simultaneous mutation of DDM1 and linker histone H1 in Arabidopsis reproduces the strong linker-specific methylation patterns of species that diverged from flowering plants and animals over a billion years ago. Our results indicate that in the absence of remodeling, nucleosomes are strong barriers to DNA methyltransferases. Linker-specific methylation can evolve simply by breaking the connection between nucleosome remodeling and DNA methylation.

Molecular Basis for K63-Linked Ubiquitination Processes in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair: A Focus on Kinetics and Dynamics

Cells are exposed to thousands of DNA damage events on a daily basis. This damage must be repaired to preserve genetic information and prevent development of disease. The most deleterious damage is a double-strand break (DSB), which is detected and repaired by mechanisms known as non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), which are components of the DNA damage response system. NHEJ is an error-prone first line of defense, whereas HR invokes error-free repair and is the focus of this review. The functions of the protein components of HR-driven DNA repair are regulated by the coordinated action of post-translational modifications including lysine acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation. The latter two mechanisms are fundamental for recognition of DSBs and reorganizing chromatin to facilitate repair. We focus on the structures and molecular mechanisms for the protein components underlying synthesis, recognition, and cleavage of K63-linked ubiquitin chains, which are abundant at damage sites and obligatory for DSB repair. The forward flux of the K63-linked ubiquitination cascade is driven by the combined activity of E1 enzyme, the heterodimeric E2 Mms2-Ubc13, and its cognate E3 ligases RNF8 and RNF168, which is balanced through the binding and cleavage of chains by the deubiquitinase BRCC36, and the proteasome, and through the binding of chains by recognition modules on repair proteins such as RAP80. We highlight a number of aspects regarding our current understanding for the role of kinetics and dynamics in determining the function of the enzymes and chain recognition modules that drive K63 ubiquitination.

Histone H1 chaperone activity of TAF-I is regulated by its subtype-dependent intramolecular interaction

Linker histone H1 is involved in the regulation of gene activity through the maintenance of higher-order chromatin structure. Previously, we have shown that template activating factor-I (TAF-I or protein SET) is involved in linker histone H1 dynamics as a histone H1 chaperone. In human and murine cells, two TAF-I subtypes exist, namely TAF-Iα and TAF-Iβ. TAF-I has a highly acidic amino acid cluster in its C-terminal region and forms homo- or heterodimers through its dimerization domain. Both dimer formation and the C-terminal region of TAF-I are essential for the histone chaperone activity. TAF-Iα exhibits less histone chaperone activity compared with TAF-Iβ even though TAF-Iα and β differ only in their N-terminal regions. However, it is unclear how subtype-specific TAF-I activities are regulated. Here, we have shown that the N-terminal region of TAF-Iα autoinhibits its histone chaperone activity via intramolecular interaction with its C-terminal region. When the interaction between the N- and C-terminal regions of TAF-Iα is disrupted, TAF-Iα shows a histone chaperone activity similar to that of TAF-Iβ. Taken together, these results provide mechanistic insights into the concept that fine tuning of TAF-I histone H1 chaperone activity relies on the subtype compositions of the TAF-I dimer.

Regulation of Cellular Dynamics and Chromosomal Binding Site Preference of Linker Histones H1.0 and H1.X

Linker histones play important roles in the genomic organization of mammalian cells. Of the linker histone variants, H1.X shows the most dynamic behavior in the nucleus. Recent research has suggested that the linker histone variants H1.X and H1.0 have different chromosomal binding site preferences. However, it remains unclear how the dynamics and binding site preferences of linker histones are determined. Here, we biochemically demonstrated that the DNA/nucleosome and histone chaperone binding activities of H1.X are significantly lower than those of other linker histones. This explains why H1.X moves more rapidly than other linker histones in vivo Domain swapping between H1.0 and H1.X suggests that the globular domain (GD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) of H1.X independently contribute to the dynamic behavior of H1.X. Our results also suggest that the N-terminal domain (NTD), GD, and CTD cooperatively determine the preferential binding sites, and the contribution of each domain for this determination is different depending on the target genes. We also found that linker histones accumulate in the nucleoli when the nucleosome binding activities of the GDs are weak. Our results contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms of dynamic behaviors, binding site selection, and localization of linker histones.

Functional interplay between histone H1 and HMG proteins in chromatin

The dynamic interaction of nucleosome binding proteins with their chromatin targets is an important element in regulating the structure and function of chromatin. Histone H1 variants and High Mobility Group (HMG) proteins are ubiquitously expressed in all vertebrate cells, bind dynamically to chromatin, and are known to affect chromatin condensation and the ability of regulatory factors to access their genomic binding sites. Here, we review the studies that focus on the interactions between H1 and HMGs and highlight the functional consequences of the interplay between these architectural chromatin binding proteins. H1 and HMG proteins are mobile molecules that bind to nucleosomes as members of a dynamic protein network. All HMGs compete with H1 for chromatin binding sites, in a dose dependent fashion, but each HMG family has specific effects on the interaction of H1 with chromatin. The interplay between H1 and HMGs affects chromatin organization and plays a role in epigenetic regulation.

Molecular dynamics of histone H1

The H1 or linker histones bind dynamically to chromatin in living cells via a process that involves transient association with the nucleosome near the DNA entry/exit site followed by dissociation, translocation to a new location, and rebinding. The mean residency time of H1 on any given nucleosome is about a minute, which is much shorter than that of most core histones but considerably longer than that of most other chromatin-binding proteins, including transcription factors. Here we review recent advances in understanding the kinetic pathway of H1 binding and how it relates to linker histone structure and function. We also describe potential mechanisms by which the dynamic binding of H1 might contribute directly to the regulation of gene expression and discuss several situations for which there is experimental evidence to support these mechanisms. Finally, we review the evidence for the participation of linker histone chaperones in mediating H1 exchange.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in material and life sciences: putting theory into practice

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a versatile tool for determining diffusion and interaction/binding properties in biological and material sciences. An understanding of the mechanisms controlling the diffusion requires a deep understanding of structure–interaction–diffusion relationships. In cell biology, for instance, this applies to the movement of proteins and lipids in the plasma membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. In industrial applications related to pharmaceutics, foods, textiles, hygiene products and cosmetics, the diffusion of solutes and solvent molecules contributes strongly to the properties and functionality of the final product. All these systems are heterogeneous, and accurate quantification of the mass transport processes at the local level is therefore essential to the understanding of the properties of soft (bio)materials. FRAP is a commonly used fluorescence microscopy-based technique to determine local molecular transport at the micrometer scale. A brief high-intensity laser pulse is locally applied to the sample, causing substantial photobleaching of the fluorescent molecules within the illuminated area. This causes a local concentration gradient of fluorescent molecules, leading to diffusional influx of intact fluorophores from the local surroundings into the bleached area. Quantitative information on the molecular transport can be extracted from the time evolution of the fluorescence recovery in the bleached area using a suitable model. A multitude of FRAP models has been developed over the years, each based on specific assumptions. This makes it challenging for the non-specialist to decide which model is best suited for a particular application. Furthermore, there are many subtleties in performing accurate FRAP experiments. For these reasons, this review aims to provide an extensive tutorial covering the essential theoretical and practical aspects so as to enable accurate quantitative FRAP experiments for molecular transport measurements in soft (bio)materials.

An improved model of predicting hepatocarcinogenic potential in rats by using gene expression data

Carcinogenicity studies using animals are expensive and time consuming. Therefore, the development of a highly accurate carcinogenicity prediction system to interpret short-term test results would be beneficial. The Ames test is popular for mutagens; however, it cannot detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Previously, we reported a prediction system using gene expression data obtained from a short-term (28-day) study that screened candidate compounds for testing in long-term carcinogenicity studies. In this study, our system was improved by adding more gene expression data. To establish our new system, we used the data of 93 test compounds (41 hepatocarcinogens and 52 non-hepatocarcinogens). Analysis of liver gene expression data by dividing compounds into 'for training' and 'for test' categories (20 cases assigned randomly) using Support Vector Machine (SVM) identified a set of marker probe sets that could be used to predict hepatocarcinogenicity. The assigned 42 probe sets have included the cancer- or c-Myc-related genes such as Hsp90, Pink1, Hspc111, Fbx29, Hepsin, Syndecan2 and Synbindin. Compared with the older version, the improved system had a higher concordance rate with the training data and a good performance with the external test data.

Interaction of chromatin with a histone H1 containing swapped N- and C-terminal domains

The present study was to understand whether the globular or C-terminal linker histone domain is more important for its binding to chromatin. Using histone H1, with swapped domain orientation, we found that both domains are equally important for nucleosome binding.

Although the details of the structural involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome are quite well understood, the sequential events involved in the recognition of its binding site are not as well known. We have used a recombinant human histone H1 (H1.1) in which the N- and C-terminal domains (NTD/CTD) have been swapped and we have reconstituted it on to a 208-bp nucleosome. We have shown that the swapped version of the protein is still able to bind to nucleosomes through its structurally folded wing helix domain (WHD); however, analytical ultracentrifuge analysis demonstrates its ability to properly fold the chromatin fibre is impaired. Furthermore, FRAP analysis shows that the highly dynamic binding association of histone H1 with the chromatin fibre is altered, with a severely decreased half time of residence. All of this suggests that proper binding of histone H1 to chromatin is determined by the simultaneous and synergistic binding of its WHD–CTD to the nucleosome.

HP1BP3 is a novel histone H1 related protein with essential roles in viability and growth

The dynamic architecture of chromatin is vital for proper cellular function, and is maintained by the concerted action of numerous nuclear proteins, including that of the linker histone H1 variants, the most abundant family of nucleosome-binding proteins. Here we show that the nuclear protein HP1BP3 is widely expressed in most vertebrate tissues and is evolutionarily and structurally related to the H1 family. HP1BP3 contains three globular domains and a highly positively charged C-terminal domain, resembling similar domains in H1. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies indicate that like H1, binding of HP1BP3 to chromatin depends on both its C and N terminal regions and is affected by the cell cycle and post translational modifications. HP1BP3 contains functional motifs not found in H1 histones, including an acidic stretch and a consensus HP1-binding motif. Transcriptional profiling of HeLa cells lacking HP1BP3 showed altered expression of 383 genes, suggesting a role for HP1BP3 in modulation of gene expression. Significantly, Hp1bp3(-/-) mice present a dramatic phenotype with 60% of pups dying within 24 h of birth and the surviving animals exhibiting a lifelong 20% growth retardation. We suggest that HP1BP3 is a ubiquitous histone H1 like nuclear protein with distinct and non-redundant functions necessary for survival and growth.

Overexpression of Camellia sinensis H1 histone gene confers abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco

KEY MESSAGE

Overexpression of CsHis in tobacco promoted chromatin condensation, but did not affect the phenotype. It also conferred tolerance to low-temperature, high-salinity, ABA, drought and oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco. H1 histone, as a major structural protein of higher-order chromatin, is associated with stress responses in plants. Here, we describe the functions of the Camellia sinensis H1 Histone gene (CsHis) to illustrate its roles in plant responses to stresses. Subcellular localization and prokaryotic expression assays showed that the CsHis protein is localized in the nucleus, and its molecular size is approximately 22.5 kD. The expression levels of CsHis in C. sinensis leaves under various conditions were investigated by qRT-PCR, and the results indicated that CsHis was strongly induced by various abiotic stresses such as low-temperature, high-salinity, ABA, drought and oxidative stress. Overexpression of CsHis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) promoted chromatin condensation, while there were almost no changes in the growth and development of transgenic tobacco plants. Phylogenetic analysis showed that CsHis belongs to the H1C and H1D variants of H1 histones, which are stress-induced variants and not the key variants required for growth and development. Stress tolerance analysis indicated that the transgenic tobacco plants exhibited higher tolerance than the WT plants upon exposure to various abiotic stresses; the transgenic plants displayed reduced wilting and senescence and exhibited greater net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) values. All the above results suggest that CsHis is a stress-induced gene and that its overexpression improves the tolerance to various abiotic stresses in the transgenic tobacco plants, possibly through the maintenance of photosynthetic efficiency.

Spatial heterogeneity of dynamics of H1 linker histone

Linker histone H1 participates in maintaining higher order chromatin structures. It is a dynamic protein that binds to DNA and exchanges rapidly with a mobile pool. Therefore, the dynamics of H1 were probed in the nuclei of intact, live cells, using an array of microscopy techniques: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), pair correlation functions (pCF) and fluorescence anisotropy. Combination of these techniques yielded information on H1 dynamics at small (1–100 μs: FCS, RICS, anisotropy), moderate (1–100 ms: FCS, RICS, pCF) and large (1–100 s: pCF and FRAP) time scales. These results indicate that the global movement of H1 in nuclei (at distances >1 µm) occurs at the time scale of seconds and is determined by processes other than diffusion. Moreover, a fraction of H1, which remains immobile at the time scale of tenths of seconds, is detectable. However, local (at distances <0.7 µm) H1 dynamics comprises a process occurring at a short (~3 ms) time scale and multiple processes occurring at longer (10–2,500 ms) scales. The former (fast) process (corresponding probably to H1 diffusion) is more pronounced in the nuclear regions characterized by low H1 concentration, but the latter (slow, attributable to H1 binding) in the regions of high H1 concentration. Furthermore, some regions in nuclei (possibly containing dense chromatin) may constitute barriers that impair or block movement of H1 histones within short (<1 µm) distances.

Open and closed: the roles of linker histones in plants and animals

Histones package DNA in all eukaryotes and play key roles in regulating gene expression. Approximately 150 base pairs of DNA wraps around an octamer of core histones to form the nucleosome, the basic unit of chromatin. Linker histones compact chromatin further by binding to and neutralizing the charge of the DNA between nucleosomes. It is well established that chromatin packing is regulated by a complex pattern of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) to core histones, but linker histone function is less well understood. In this review, we describe the current understanding of the many roles that linker histones play in cellular processes, including gene regulation, cell division, and development, while putting the linker histone in the context of other nuclear proteins. Although intriguing roles for plant linker histones are beginning to emerge, much of our current understanding comes from work in animal systems. Many unanswered questions remain and additional work is required to fully elucidate the complex processes mediated by linker histones in plants.

Pin1 promotes histone H1 dephosphorylation and stabilizes its binding to chromatin

The prolyl isomerase Pin1 stimulates the dephosphorylation of histone H1, stabilizing its binding to chromatin at transcriptionally active chromatin.

Histone H1 plays a crucial role in stabilizing higher order chromatin structure. Transcriptional activation, DNA replication, and chromosome condensation all require changes in chromatin structure and are correlated with the phosphorylation of histone H1. In this study, we describe a novel interaction between Pin1, a phosphorylation-specific prolyl isomerase, and phosphorylated histone H1. A sub-stoichiometric amount of Pin1 stimulated the dephosphorylation of H1 in vitro and modulated the structure of the C-terminal domain of H1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Depletion of Pin1 destabilized H1 binding to chromatin only when Pin1 binding sites on H1 were present. Pin1 recruitment and localized histone H1 phosphorylation were associated with transcriptional activation independent of RNA polymerase II. We thus identify a novel form of histone H1 regulation through phosphorylation-dependent proline isomerization, which has consequences on overall H1 phosphorylation levels and the stability of H1 binding to chromatin.

Chromatin dynamics during lytic infection with herpes simplex virus 1

Latent HSV-1 genomes are chromatinized with silencing marks. Since 2004, however, there has been an apparent inconsistency in the studies of the chromatinization of the HSV-1 genomes in lytically infected cells. Nuclease protection and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays suggested that the genomes were not regularly chromatinized, having only low histone occupancy. However, the chromatin modifications associated with transcribed and non-transcribed HSV-1 genes were those associated with active or repressed transcription, respectively. Moreover, the three critical HSV-1 transcriptional activators all had the capability to induce chromatin remodelling, and interacted with critical chromatin modifying enzymes. Depletion or overexpression of some, but not all, chromatin modifying proteins affected HSV-1 transcription, but often in unexpected manners. Since 2010, it has become clear that both cellular and HSV-1 chromatins are highly dynamic in infected cells. These dynamics reconcile the weak interactions between HSV-1 genomes and chromatin proteins, detected by nuclease protection and chromatin immunoprecipitation, with the proposed regulation of HSV-1 gene expression by chromatin, supported by the marks in the chromatin in the viral genomes and the abilities of the HSV-1 transcription activators to modulate chromatin. It also explains the sometimes unexpected results of interventions to modulate chromatin remodelling activities in infected cells.

The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin

Nucleosome remodelers of the DDM1/Lsh family are required for DNA methylation of transposable elements, but the reason for this is unknown. How DDM1 interacts with other methylation pathways, such as small-RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), which is thought to mediate plant asymmetric methylation through DRM enzymes, is also unclear. Here, we show that most asymmetric methylation is facilitated by DDM1 and mediated by the methyltransferase CMT2 separately from RdDM. We find that heterochromatic sequences preferentially require DDM1 for DNA methylation and that this preference depends on linker histone H1. RdDM is instead inhibited by heterochromatin and absolutely requires the nucleosome remodeler DRD1. Together, DDM1 and RdDM mediate nearly all transposon methylation and collaborate to repress transposition and regulate the methylation and expression of genes. Our results indicate that DDM1 provides DNA methyltransferases access to H1-containing heterochromatin to allow stable silencing of transposable elements in cooperation with the RdDM pathway.

Linker histone subtypes and their allelic variants

Members of histone H1 family bind to nucleosomal and linker DNA to assist in stabilization of higher-order chromatin structures. Moreover, histone H1 is involved in regulation of a variety of cellular processes by interactions with cytosolic and nuclear proteins. Histone H1, composed of a series of subtypes encoded by distinct genes, is usually differentially expressed in specialized cells and frequently non-randomly distributed in different chromatin regions. Moreover, a role of specific histone H1 subtype might be also modulated by post-translational modifications and/or presence of polymorphic isoforms. While the significance of covalently modified histone H1 subtypes has been partially recognized, much less is known about the importance of histone H1 polymorphic variants identified in various plant and animal species, and human cells as well. Recent progress in elucidating amino acid composition-dependent functioning and interactions of the histone H1 with a variety of molecular partners indicates a potential role of histone H1 polymorphic variation in adopting specific protein conformations essential for chromatin function. The histone H1 allelic variants might affect chromatin in order to modulate gene expression underlying some physiological traits and, therefore could modify the course of diverse histone H1-dependent biological processes. This review focuses on the histone H1 allelic variability, and biochemical and genetic aspects of linker histone allelic isoforms to emphasize their likely biological relevance.

Crosstalk between SET7/9-dependent methylation and ARTD1-mediated ADP-ribosylation of histone H1.4

Background

Different histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) fine-tune and integrate different cellular signaling pathways at the chromatin level. ADP-ribose modification of histones by cellular ADP-ribosyltransferases such as ARTD1 (PARP1) is one of the many elements of the histone code. All 5 histone proteins were described to be ADP-ribosylated in vitro and in vivo. However, the crosstalk between ADP-ribosylation and other modifications is little understood.

Results

In experiments with isolated histones, it was found that ADP-ribosylation of H3 by ARTD1 prevents H3 methylation by SET7/9. However, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) of histone H3 surprisingly allowed subsequent methylation of H1 by SET7/9. Histone H1 was thus identified as a new target for SET7/9. The SET7/9 methylation sites in H1.4 were pinpointed to the last lysine residues of the six KAK motifs in the C-terminal domain (K121, K129, K159, K171, K177 and K192). Interestingly, H1 and the known SET7/9 target protein H3 competed with each other for SET7/9-dependent methylation.

Conclusions

The results presented here identify H1.4 as a novel SET7/9 target protein, and document an intricate crosstalk between H3 and H1 methylation and PARylation, thus implying substrate competition as a regulatory mechanism. Thereby, these results underline the role of ADP-ribosylation as an element of the histone code.

The effect of linker histone's nucleosome binding affinity on chromatin unfolding mechanisms

Eukaryotic gene activation requires selective unfolding of the chromatin fiber to access the DNA for processes such as DNA transcription, replication, and repair. Mutation/modification experiments of linker histone (LH) H1 suggest the importance of dynamic mechanisms for LH binding/dissociation, but the effects on chromatin's unfolding pathway remain unclear. Here we investigate the stretching response of chromatin fibers by mesoscale modeling to complement single-molecule experiments, and present various unfolding mechanisms for fibers with different nucleosome repeat lengths (NRLs) with/without LH that are fixed to their cores or bind/unbind dynamically with different affinities. Fiber softening occurs for long compared to short NRL (due to facile stacking rearrangements), dynamic compared to static LH/core binding as well as slow rather than fast dynamic LH rebinding (due to DNA stem destabilization), and low compared to high LH concentration (due to DNA stem inhibition). Heterogeneous superbead constructs--nucleosome clusters interspersed with extended fiber regions--emerge during unfolding of medium-NRL fibers and may be related to those observed experimentally. Our work suggests that fast and slow LH binding pools, present simultaneously in vivo, might act cooperatively to yield controlled fiber unfolding at low forces. Medium-NRL fibers with multiple dynamic LH pools offer both flexibility and selective DNA exposure, and may be evolutionarily suitable to regulate chromatin architecture and gene expression.

Role of Template Activating Factor-I as a chaperone in linker histone dynamics

Linker histone H1 is a fundamental chromosomal protein involved in the maintenance of higher-ordered chromatin organization. The exchange dynamics of histone H1 correlates well with chromatin plasticity. A variety of core histone chaperones involved in core histone dynamics has been identified, but the identity of the linker histone chaperone in the somatic cell nucleus has been a long-standing unanswered question. Here we show that Template Activating Factor-I (TAF-I, also known as protein SET) is involved in histone H1 dynamics as a linker histone chaperone. Among previously identified core histone chaperones and linker histone chaperone candidates, only TAF-I was found to be associated specifically with histone H1 in mammalian somatic cell nuclei. TAF-I showed linker histone chaperone activity in vitro. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analyses revealed that TAF-I is involved in the regulation of histone H1 dynamics in the nucleus. Therefore, we propose that TAF-I is a key molecule that regulates linker histone-mediated chromatin assembly and disassembly.

Nuclear structure of Trypanosoma cruzi

The presence of nucleus in living organisms characterizes the Eukaryote domain. The nucleus compartmentalizes the genetic material surrounded by a double membrane called nuclear envelope. The nucleus has been observed since the advent of the light microscope, and sub-compartments such as nucleoli, diverse nuclear bodies and condensed chromosomes have been later recognized, being part of highly organized and dynamic structure. The significance and function of such organization has increased with the understanding of transcription, replication, DNA repair, recombination processes. It is now recognized as consequence of adding complexity and regulation in more complex eukaryotic cells. Here we provide a description of the actual stage of knowledge of the nuclear structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. As an early divergent eukaryote, it presents unique and/or reduced events of DNA replication, transcription and repair as well as RNA processing and transport to the cytosol. Nevertheless, it shows peculiar structure changes accordingly to the cell cycle and stage of differentiation. T. cruzi proliferates only as epimastigote and amastigote stages, and when these forms differentiate in trypomastigote forms, their cell cycle is arrested. This arrested stage is capable of invading mammalian cells and of surviving harsh conditions, such as the gut of the insect vector and mammalian macrophages. Transcription and replication decrease during transformation in trypomastigotes implicating large alterations in the nuclear structure. Recent evidences also suggest that T. cruzi nucleus respond to oxidative and nutritional stresses. Due to the phylogenetic proximity with other well-known trypanosomes, such as Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major, they are expected to have similar nuclear organization, although differences are noticed due to distinct life cycles, cellular organizations and the specific adaptations for surviving in different host environments. Therefore, the general features of T. cruzi nuclear structure regarding unique characteristics of this protozoan parasite will be described.

Linker histone H1 stimulates DNA strand exchange between short oligonucleotides retaining high sensitivity to heterology

The interaction of human linker histone H1(0) with short oligonucleotides was characterized. The capability of the histone to promote DNA strand exchange in this system has been demonstrated. The reaction is reversible at saturating amounts of H1 corresponding to complete binding of the oligonucleotide substrates with the histone. In our conditions the complete saturation of DNA with the histone occurs at a ratio of one protein molecule per about 60 nucleotides irrespectively of DNA strandedness. In contrast to the DNA strand exchange promoted by RecA-like enzymes of homologous recombination the H1 promoted reaction exhibits low tolerance to interruptions of homology between oligonucleotide substrates comparable to those for the case of spontaneous strand exchange between free DNA molecules at elevated temperatures and the exchange promoted by some synthetic polycations.

Histone H1 interphase phosphorylation becomes largely established in G1 or early S phase and differs in G1 between T-lymphoblastoid cells and normal T cells

Background

Histone H1 is an important constituent of chromatin, and is involved in regulation of its structure. During the cell cycle, chromatin becomes locally decondensed in S phase, highly condensed during metaphase, and again decondensed before re-entry into G₁. This has been connected to increasing phosphorylation of H1 histones through the cell cycle. However, many of these experiments have been performed using cell-synchronization techniques and cell cycle-arresting drugs. In this study, we investigated the H1 subtype composition and phosphorylation pattern in the cell cycle of normal human activated T cells and Jurkat T-lymphoblastoid cells by capillary electrophoresis after sorting of exponentially growing cells into G₁, S and G₂/M populations.

Results

We found that the relative amount of H1.5 protein increased significantly after T-cell activation. Serine phosphorylation of H1 subtypes occurred to a large extent in late G₁ or early S phase in both activated T cells and Jurkat cells. Furthermore, our data confirm that the H1 molecules newly synthesized during S phase achieve a similar phosphorylation pattern to the previous ones. Jurkat cells had more extended H1.5 phosphorylation in G₁ compared with T cells, a difference that can be explained by faster cell growth and/or the presence of enhanced H1 kinase activity in G₁ in Jurkat cells.

Conclusion

Our data are consistent with a model in which a major part of interphase H1 phosphorylation takes place in G₁ or early S phase. This implies that H1 serine phosphorylation may be coupled to changes in chromatin structure necessary for DNA replication. In addition, the increased H1 phosphorylation of malignant cells in G₁ may be affecting the G₁/S transition control and enabling facilitated S-phase entry as a result of relaxed chromatin condensation. Furthermore, increased H1.5 expression may be coupled to the proliferative capacity of growth-stimulated T cells.

Chromatin compaction in terminally differentiated avian blood cells: the role of linker histone H5 and non-histone protein MENT

Chromatin has a tendency to shift from a relatively decondensed (active) to condensed (inactive) state during cell differentiation due to interactions of specific architectural and/or regulatory proteins with DNA. A promotion of chromatin folding in terminally differentiated avian blood cells requires the presence of either histone H5 in erythrocytes or non-histone protein, myeloid and erythroid nuclear termination stage-specific protein (MENT), in white blood cells (lymphocytes and granulocytes). These highly abundant proteins assist in folding of nucleosome arrays and self-association of chromatin fibers into compacted chromatin structures. Here, we briefly review structural aspects and molecular mode of action by which these unrelated proteins can spread condensed chromatin to form inactivated regions in the genome.

In vivo Study of the Histone Chaperone Activity of Nucleolin by FRAP

Nucleolin is a major nucleolar protein involved in various aspects of ribosome biogenesis such as regulation of polymerase I transcription, pre-RNA maturation, and ribosome assembly. Nucleolin is also present in the nucleoplasm suggesting that its functions are not restricted to nucleoli. Nucleolin possesses, in vitro, chromatin co-remodeler and histone chaperone activities which could explain numerous functions of nucleolin related to the regulation of gene expression. The goal of this report was to investigate the consequences of nucleolin depletion on the dynamics of histones in live cells. Changes in histone dynamics occurring in nucleolin silenced cells were measured by FRAP experiments on eGFP-tagged histones (H2B, H4, and macroH2A). We found that nuclear histone dynamics was impacted in nucleolin silenced cells; in particular we measured higher fluorescence recovery kinetics for macroH2A and H2B but not for H4. Interestingly, we showed that nucleolin depletion also impacted the dissociation constant rate of H2B and H4. Thus, in live cells, nucleolin could play a role in chromatin accessibility by its histone chaperone and co-remodeling activities.

Histone H2A C-terminus regulates chromatin dynamics, remodeling, and histone H1 binding

The tails of histone proteins are central players for all chromatin-mediated processes. Whereas the N-terminal histone tails have been studied extensively, little is known about the function of the H2A C-terminus. Here, we show that the H2A C-terminal tail plays a pivotal role in regulating chromatin structure and dynamics. We find that cells expressing C-terminally truncated H2A show increased stress sensitivity. Moreover, both the complete and the partial deletion of the tail result in increased histone exchange kinetics and nucleosome mobility in vivo and in vitro. Importantly, our experiments reveal that the H2A C-terminus is required for efficient nucleosome translocation by ISWI-type chromatin remodelers and acts as a novel recognition module for linker histone H1. Thus, we suggest that the H2A C-terminal tail has a bipartite function: stabilisation of the nucleosomal core particle, as well as mediation of the protein interactions that control chromatin dynamics and conformation.

Histones are the main protein components of chromatin. The N-terminal tails of histones stick out from the nucleosomes, the building blocks of chromatin, and are involved in the regulation of all DNA–dependent processes. Only Histone H2A has an additional C-terminal tail and currently very little is known about the function of this tail. The H2A C-terminus protrudes from the nucleosome and is located where the DNA enters and leaves the nucleosome. We show here that it can interact with the linker histone H1 that is important for higher order chromatin structure. We also find that this tail is involved in regulating nucleosome dynamics and mobility of H2A itself. The C-terminal H2A tail has also an important function in regulating the activity of chromatin remodelers, enzymes that can reposition nucleosomes. Furthermore we find that cells expressing C-terminally truncated H2A are more sensitive to stress, demonstrating that this tail is important for cellular homeostasis. Together our results reflect a key function of the H2A C-terminus in chromatin biology.

Core histone hyperacetylation impacts cooperative behavior and high-affinity binding of histone H1 to chromatin

Linker histones stabilize higher order chromatin structures and limit access to proteins involved in DNA-dependent processes. Core histone acetylation is thought to modulate H1 binding. In the current study, we employed kinetic modeling of H1 recovery curves obtained during fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments to determine the impact of core histone acetylation on the different variants of H1. Following brief treatments with histone deacetylase inhibitor, most variants showed no change in H1 dynamics. A change in mobility was detected only when longer treatments were used to induce high levels of histone acetylation. This hyperacetylation imparted marked changes in the dynamics of low-affinity H1 population, while conferring variant-specific changes in the mobility of H1 molecules that were strongly bound. Both the C-terminal domain (CTD) and globular domain were responsible for this differential response to TSA. Furthermore, we found that neither the CTD nor the globular domain, by themselves, undergoes a change in kinetics following hyperacetylation. This led us to conclude that hyperacetylation of core histones affects the cooperative nature of low-affinity H1 binding, with some variants undergoing a predicted decrease of almost 2 orders of magnitude.

FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?

The binding of nuclear proteins to chromatin in live cells has been analyzed by kinetic modeling procedures applied to experimental data from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). The kinetic models have yielded a number of important biological predictions about transcription, but concerns have arisen about the accuracy of these predictions. First, different studies using different kinetic models have arrived at very different predictions for the same or similar proteins. Second, some of these divergent predictions have been shown to arise from technical issues rather than biological differences. For confidence and accuracy, gold standards for the measurement of in vivo binding must be established by extensive cross validation using both different experimental methods and different kinetic modeling procedures.

Dissecting the binding mechanism of the linker histone in live cells: an integrated FRAP analysis

The linker histone H1 has a fundamental role in DNA compaction. Although models for H1 binding generally involve the H1 C-terminal tail and sites S1 and S2 within the H1 globular domain, there is debate about the importance of these binding regions and almost nothing is known about how they work together. Using a novel fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) procedure, we have measured the affinities of these regions individually, in pairs, and in the full molecule to demonstrate for the first time that binding among several combinations is cooperative in live cells. Our analysis reveals two preferred H1 binding pathways and we find evidence for a novel conformational change required by both. These results paint a complex, highly dynamic picture of H1-chromatin binding, with a significant fraction of H1 molecules only partially bound in metastable states that can be readily competed against. We anticipate the methods we have developed here will be broadly applicable, particularly for deciphering the binding kinetics of other nuclear proteins that, similar to H1, interact with and modify chromatin.