Affinity of calcium channel inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and other vasoactive compounds for the nucleoside transport system

Dipyridamole suppresses high glucose-induced osteopontin secretion and mRNA expression in rat aortic smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients are frequently afflicted with medial artery calcification, a predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Diabetes induced the expression of osteopontin in arterial vasculature, which is an indicator of disease progression in artery calcification and vascular stiffness. Signal transduction and strategies that suppress high glucose-induced osteopontin expression in arterial vascular smooth muscle cells is investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The incubation of rat aortic smooth muscle cells under high glucose concentration increased osteopontin protein secretion and mRNA expression. Treatment with dipyridamole decreased high glucose-induced osteopontin expression and secretion. Dipyridamole decreased glucose-induced osteopontin through inhibition of phosphodiesterase, thereby increasing intracellular levels of adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) and guanosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), and increased thioredoxin expression to inhibit the reactive oxygen species (ROS) system. Induction of osteopontin was reversed when cells were pretreated with N-[2-bromocinnamyl(amino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (H89, cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor), KT5823 (cGMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor), or dinitrochlorobenzene (thioredoxin reductase inhibitor). The antioxidant, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, suppressed glucose-induced osteopontin expression by decreasing ROS concentration. Both H89 and KT5823 downregulated thioredoxin expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a novel effect for dipyridamole to suppress high glucose-induced osteopontin protein secretion and mRNA expression. Dipyridamole has antioxidant properties and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor activity, which might be useful to ameliorate diabetic vasculopathy and its cardiovascular complications.

Effects of calcium channel blockers on antidepressant action of Alprazolam and Imipramine

Alprazolam is effective as an anxiolytic and in the adjunct treatment of depression. In this study, the effects of calcium channel antagonists on the antidepressant action of alprazolam and imipramine were investigated. A forced swimming maze was used to study behavioral despair in albino mice. Mice were divided into nine groups (n = 7 per group). One group received a single dose of 1% Tween 80; two groups each received a single dose of the antidepressant alone (alprazolam or imipramine); two groups each received a single dose of the calcium channel blocker (nifedipine or verapamil); four groups each received a single dose of the calcium channel blocker followed by a single dose of the antidepressant (with same doses used for either in the previous four groups). Drug administration was performed concurrently on the nine groups. Our data confirmed the antidepressant action of alprazolam and imipramine. Both nifedipine and verapamil produced a significant antidepressant effect (delay the onset of immobility) when administered separately. Verapamil augmented the antidepressant effects of alprazolam and imipramine (additive antidepressant effect). This may be due to the possibility that verapamil might have antidepressant-like effect through different mechanism. Nifedipine and imipramine combined led to a delay in the onset of immobility greater than their single use but less than the sum of their independent administration. This may be due to the fact that nifedipine on its own might act as an antidepressant but blocks one imipramine mechanism that depends on L-type calcium channel activation. Combining nifedipine with alprazolam produced additional antidepressant effects, which indicates that they exert antidepressant effects through different mechanisms.

Inhibition of human equilibrative nucleoside transporters by dihydropyridine-type calcium channel antagonists

Dihydropyridine-type calcium channel antagonists, in addition to having a vasodilatory effect, are known to inhibit cellular uptake of nucleosides such as adenosine. However, the nucleoside transporter subtypes involved and the mechanism by which this occurs are not known. Therefore, we have studied the inhibitory effects of dihydropyridines on both human equilibrative nucleoside transporters, hENT-1 and hENT-2, which are the major transporters mediating nucleoside transport in most tissues. Among the dihydropyridines tested, nimodipine proved to be the most potent inhibitor of hENT-1, with an IC(50) value of 60+/-31 muM, whereas nifedipine, nicardipine, nitrendipine, and felodipine exhibited 100-fold less effective inhibitory activity. Nifedipine, nitrendipine, and nimodipine inhibited hENT-2 with IC(50) values in the micromolar range; however, nicardipine and felodipine had no significant effect on hENT-2. Removal of the 4-aryl ring or changing the nitro group at the 4-aryl ring proved not to be detrimental to the inhibitory effects of dihydropyridines on hENT-1, but resulted in a drastic decrease in their inhibitory effects on hENT-2. Kinetic studies revealed that nimodipine and nifedipine reduced V(max) of [(3)H]uridine transport without affecting K(m). The inhibitory effects of nimodipine and nifedipine could be washed out. In addition, nimodipine and nifedipine inhibited the rate of NBTGR-induced dissociation of [(3)H]NBMPR from hENT-1 cell membrane. We conclude that dihydropyridines are non-competitive inhibitors of hENT-1 and hENT-2, probably working through reversible interactions with the allosteric sites. The inhibitory potencies of dihydropyridines may be associated with the structure of the 4-aryl ring, as well as the ester groups at the C-3 and C-5 positions.

Dipyridamole activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 mediates inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in RAW 264.7 cells

Dipyridamole is a nucleoside transport inhibitor and a non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor. However, the mechanisms by which dipyridamole exerts its anti-inflammatory effects are not completely understood. In the present study, we investigated the role of mitogen-activated kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) in dipyridamole's anti-inflammatory effects. We show that dipyridamole inhibited interleukin-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 secretion, inducible nitric oxide synthase protein expression, nitrite accumulation, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) induction in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Dipyridamole inhibited the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) signaling pathway as demonstrated by inhibition of the inhibitor of NF-kappaB (IkappaB) phosphorylation, IkappaB degradation, p65 translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus, and transcription of the reporter gene. Dipyridamole also inhibited LPS-stimulated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) and IkappaB kinase-beta (IKK-beta) activities in RAW 264.7 cells. A p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB 203580, inhibited LPS-stimulated COX-2 expression and IKK-beta activation suggesting that LPS may activate the NF-kappaB signaling pathway via upstream p38 MAPK activation. Furthermore, dipyridamole stimulated transient activation of MKP-1, a potent inhibitor of p38 MAPK function. Knockdown of MKP-1 by transfecting MKP-1 siRNA or inhibition of MKP-1 by the specific inhibitor, triptolide, significantly reduced the inhibitory effects of dipyridamole on COX-2 expression induced by LPS. Taken together, these data suggest that dipyridamole exerts its anti-inflammatory effect via activation of MKP-1, which dephosphorylates and inactivates p38 MAPK. Inactivation of p38 MAPK in turn inhibits IKK-beta activation and subsequently the NF-kappaB signaling pathway that mediates LPS-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in RAW 264.7 cells.

Long-chain fatty acid uptake and FAT/CD36 translocation in heart and skeletal muscle

Cellular long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) uptake constitutes a process that is not yet fully understood. LCFA uptake likely involves both passive diffusion and protein-mediated transport. Several lines of evidence support the involvement of a number of plasma membrane-associated proteins, including fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36, plasma membrane-bound fatty acid binding protein (FABPpm), and fatty acid transport protein (FATP). In heart and skeletal muscle primary attention has been given to unravel the mechanisms by which FAT/CD36 expression and function are regulated. It appears that both insulin and contractions induce the translocation of intracellular stored FAT/CD36 to the plasma membrane to increase cellular LCFA uptake. This review focuses on this novel mechanism of regulation of LCFA uptake in heart and skeletal muscle in health and disease. The distinct signaling pathways underlying insulin-induced and contraction-induced FAT/CD36 translocation will be discussed and a comparison will be made with the well-defined glucose transport system involving the glucose transporter GLUT4. Finally, it is hypothesized that malfunctioning of recycling of these transporters may lead to intracellular triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation and cellular insulin resistance. Current data indicate a pivotal role for FAT/CD36 in the regulation of LCFA utilization in heart and skeletal muscle under normal conditions as well as during the altered LCFA utilization observed in obesity and insulin resistance. Hence, FAT/CD36 might provide a useful therapeutic target for the prevention or treatment of insulin resistance.

The influence of diazepam and midazolam on adenosine-induced forearm vasodilation in humans

Adenosine is an endogenous purine with vasodilating and cardioprotective properties. Animal experiments have shown that some benzodiazepine-induced effects can be explained by potentiation of adenosine effects, via inhibition of the nucleoside transport system. The objective of this study was to determine whether the frequently used benzodiazepines diazepam and midazolam increase adenosine-induced vasodilation in the human forearm vascular bed, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. Adenosine (0.6, 6, 20, and 60 nmol/min/dl ForeArm Volume) was infused into the brachial artery with and without concomitant separate infusion of diazepam (21 nmol/min/dl, n = 9) and midazolam (23 nmol/min/dl, n = 8). Plasma concentrations of diazepam resp. midazolam at the end of the infusion protocol averaged 0.5 +/- 0.2 microg/ml plasma (1.6 microM) for diazepam versus 1.2 +/- 0.4 microg/ml plasma (3 microM) for midazolam. Intra-arterial infusion of the benzodiazepines did not alter baseline vascular tone, and had no significant influence on the forearm vasodilator response to adenosine. The adenosine-induced relative change in Forearm Vascular Resistance (FVR) was -3 +/- 7, -48 +/- 8, -75 +/- 6, and -85 +/- 3% in the absence and 3.5 +/- 11, -54 +/- 5, -74 +/- 5, and -82 +/- 3% resp. in the presence of diazepam (P > 0.1, repeated measures ANOVA, n = 9). Likewise, in the absence resp. presence of midazolam, FVR fell by 1 +/- 6, 55 +/- 5, 74 +/- 3, and 84 +/- 2% resp. 11 +/- 11, 59 +/- 2, 80 +/- 3, and 87 +/- 2% (P > 0.1, n = 7). Intra-brachial infusion of diazepam and midazolam resulting in forearm concentrations in the high therapeutic range does not augment adenosine-induced forearm vasodilation. A possible interaction at supra-therapeutic levels of the benzodiazepines can not be excluded from the present study, but lacks clinical significance.

Dipyridamole alters cardiac substrate preference by inducing translocation of FAT/CD36, but not that of GLUT4

In cardiac myocytes, uptake rates of glucose and long-chain fatty acids (FA) are regulated by translocation of GLUT4 and FA translocase (FAT)/CD36, respectively, from intracellular stores to the sarcolemma. Insulin and contractions are two major physiological stimuli able to induce translocation of both transporters and therefore enhance the uptake of both substrates. Interestingly, the cardiovascular drug dipyridamole was able to enhance FA uptake but had no effect on glucose uptake. The selective stimulatory effect of dipyridamole on FA uptake was unrelated to its effects on phosphodiesterase inhibition and on nucleoside transport inhibition. However, dipyridamole-stimulated FA uptake was abolished in the presence of sulfo-N-succinimidylpalmitate, which indicated that FAT/CD36 is involved in the uptake process. Furthermore, the effect was additive to that of insulin but not to that of the AMP-elevating agent oligomycin, indicating that dipyridamole stimulates FAT/CD36-mediated FA uptake by activating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway. Dipyridamole, however, neither influenced the intracellular AMP content nor induced activation of AMPK. Finally, dipyridamole was able to induce FAT/CD36 translocation from intracellular storage sites to the sarcolemma but had no effect on the subcellular distribution of GLUT4. It is concluded that beyond AMP-activated protein kinase the contraction-induced and AMPK-mediated signal branches off into separate mobilization of GLUT4 and of FAT/CD36, and that dipyridamole activates a yet unidentified target in the FAT/CD36 mobilizing branch.

Cyclosporine A and purinergic receptors in rat kidney

Previous reports have demonstrated that Cyclosporine A (CyA) chronically administered induces an increase in adenosine plasma concentration by inhibiting adenosine uptake by red blood cells (RBC). We hypothesized that this effect may modulate, by a down regulation, the mRNA expression of adenosine receptors in rat kidney. Since high blood pressure (HBP) is a classical side effect of CyA treatment, nicardipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is often associated with CyA in treatment. To distinguish between the effects of CyA-induced HBP and the effects of CyA by itself, we have evaluated the effects of CyA and/or nicardipine on the mRNA expression of A1 and A2a adenosine receptors. The study was performed on five groups of rats (n= 8) receiving during 21 days either serum saline (0.5 ml i.p), CyA (12 mg/kg/day, i.p), nicardipine (1.2 mg/kg i.p) or nicardipine + CyA. The last (or fifth) group was injected with vehicle (0.5 ml i.p). Blood samples for adenosine assay were collected in the renal artery at day 21, just before the rat kidneys were removed for quantitation of adenosine A1 and A2a mRNA concentration by RT-PCR. We make two conclusions :i) Nicardipine induces a decrease in mRNA expression of A1 but not of A2a adenosine receptors. However, because nicardipine lowered both blood pressure and A1 mRNA expression, it is not possible to conclude if A1 mRNA decrease is implicated in the nicardipine effects on blood pressure.ii) CyA induces an increase in renal artery adenosine concentration and a decrease in mRNA expression of A1 and A2a adenosine receptors.

Plasma adenosine concentrations during adenosine-induced respiratory stimulation in man

Intravenous infusion of the nucleoside adenosine stimulates respiration, probably at least partly by an action in the carotid bodies, and also potentiates the ventilatory response to hypoxia, suggesting that it might be involved in the control of breathing. Whether the effects of adenosine occur at concentrations likely to be achieved in vivo is unknown and was investigated in 7 patients with arterial catheters inserted for diagnostic purposes. During intravenous infusion of adenosine (Maximum dose per min: mean 130 micrograms kg-1) mean minute ventilation increased from 5.5 to 10.9 l min-1 while mean plasma adenosine concentration in the aortic arch increased from 0.07 to 1.2 microM. In 3 patients ventilation first increased without a detectable increase in aortic adenosine concentration, suggesting a possible intra-pulmonary effect of adenosine, although increased concentrations were apparent at higher doses. Micromolar concentrations of adenosine are probably achieved in vivo in tissues during hypoxia. The present results show that at such concentrations adenosine stimulates respiration and are consistent with the suggestion that adenosine release may mediate or modulate the ventilatory response to hypoxia. A possible intra-pulmonary effect of adenosine merits further study.

Heterogeneity of nucleoside transport inhibitory sites in heart: a quantitative autoradiographical analysis

1. The distribution of nucleoside transport inhibitory sites in rat and guinea-pig cardiac sections was investigated by use of [3H]-nitrobenzylthioinosine ([3H]-NBMPR) autoradiography. The distribution of these sites was heterogeneous in guinea-pig sections and homogeneous in rat sections. 2. The areas of high density of nucleoside transport inhibitory sites found in guinea-pig cardiac sections were compared to the distribution of an endothelial cell marker, von Willebrand Factor, determined by radioimmunocytochemistry. These two markers were co-localized suggesting that coronary endothelial cells from guinea-pig have a high density of NBMPR binding sites and thus may have a high nucleoside transport capacity. 3. Nucleoside transporter subtypes with differing affinity for NBMPR or dipyridamole were investigated by quantitative autoradiography. Sites in rat tissues had high affinity for NBMPR (KD = 0.6 nM) but were of low sensitivity to dipyridamole (Ki = 3.1 microM). In guinea-pig sections, areas of high and low [3H]-NBMPR binding site density were analyzed separately. In both areas, sites had high affinity for NBMPR (KD = 1.4 nM, 4.5 nM, respectively) and dipyridamole (Ki = 108 nM, 245 nM, respectively). 4. While differences in density of nucleoside transport inhibitory sites are detectable between distinct regions of the heart, subtypes differing in affinity for NBMPR or dipyridamole were not evident. Therefore, more detailed structure activity studies are required to determine if subtypes of these sites exist within a single heart.

Inhibition of radioligand binding to A1 adenosine receptors by Bay K8644 and nifedipine

Two dihydropyridine compounds, Bay K8644 (a calcium entry activator) and nifedipine (a calcium entry blocker), were found to inhibit the binding of [3H]phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]PIA) to A1 adenosine receptors in rat cerebral cortex membranes with comparable potencies (IC50 10-30 microM). Scatchard analyses indicated that both Bay K8644 and nifedipine inhibited the binding of [3H]PIA by increasing the KD but without significant effect on the Bmax. When tested at 100 microM, neither Bay K8644 nor nifedipine showed a significant effect on [3H]-p-aminoclonidine ([3H]PAC; alpha 2-adrenergic receptor), [3H]dihydroalprenolol ([3H]DHA; beta-adrenergic receptor), [3H]spiperone (dopamine receptor), and [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine [( 3H]NBMPR; nucleoside transporter) binding. In the presence of 10 mM Mg2+, the ability of 2-chloroadenosine (2-Cl-Ad, an A1 adenosine receptor agonist) to displace [3H]PIA binding was increased. Conversely, the potencies of 1,3-diethyl-8-phenylxanthine (DPX; an A1 receptor antagonist), Bay K8644 and nifedipine in inhibiting [3H]PIA binding were unchanged. It is suggested that both Bay K8644 and nifedipine may act as antagonists of adenosine A1 receptors, in addition to their well-known effects on calcium channels.