1
|
Azad CL, Beres LK, Wu AW, Fong A, Giladi AM. Developing a multimedia patient-reported outcomes measure for low literacy patients with a human-centered design approach. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304351. [PMID: 38838037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Almost all patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are text-based, which impedes accurate completion by low and limited literacy patients. Few PROMs are designed or validated to be self-administered, either in clinical or research settings, by patients of all literacy levels. We aimed to adapt the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Short Form (PROMIS-UE) to a multimedia version (mPROMIS-UE) that can be self-administered by hand and upper extremity patients of all literacy levels. METHODS Our study in which we applied the Multimedia Adaptation Protocol included seven phases completed in a serial, iterative fashion: planning with our community advisory board; direct observation; discovery interviews with patients, caregivers, and clinic staff; ideation; prototyping; member-checking interviews; and feedback. Direct observations were documented in memos that underwent rapid thematic analysis. Interviews were audio-recorded and documented using analytic memos; a rapid, framework-guided thematic analysis with both inductive and deductive themes was performed. Themes were distilled into design challenges to guide ideation and prototyping that involved our multidisciplinary research team. To assess completeness, credibility, and acceptability we completed additional interviews with member-checking of initial findings and consulted our community advisory board. RESULTS We conducted 12 hours of observations. We interviewed 17 adult English-speaking participants (12 patients, 3 caregivers, 2 staff) of mixed literacy. Our interviews revealed two distinct user personas and three distinct literacy personas; we developed the mPROMIS-UE with these personas in mind. Themes from interviews were distilled into four broad design challenges surrounding literacy, customizability, convenience, and shame. We identified features (audio, animations, icons, avatars, progress indicator, illustrated response scale) that addressed the design challenges. The last 6 interviews included member-checking; participants felt that the themes, design challenges, and corresponding features resonated with them. These features were synthesized into an mPROMIS-UE prototype that underwent rounds of iterative refinement, the last of which was guided by recommendations from our community advisory board. DISCUSSION We successfully adapted the PROMIS-UE to an mPROMIS-UE that addresses the challenges identified by a mixed literacy hand and upper extremity patient cohort. This demonstrates the feasibility of adapting PROMs to multimedia versions. Future research will include back adaptation, usability testing via qualitative evaluation, and psychometric validation of the mPROMIS-UE. A validated mPROMIS-UE will expand clinicians' and investigators' ability to capture patient-reported outcomes in mixed literacy populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Long Azad
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Laura K Beres
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Albert W Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Allan Fong
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Aviram M Giladi
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rogers MJ, Daryoush JR, Zhang C, Cizik A, Presson AP, Kazmers NH. Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:53. [PMID: 38816587 PMCID: PMC11139816 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00736-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no gold standard patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hand surgery. As a result, a diverse array of PROM instruments have been utilized across centers over time. Lack of score interchangeability limits the ability to compare or conglomerate scores when new instruments are introduced. Our aim was to develop a linkage for the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT scores and develop crosswalk tables for interconversion between these PROMs. METHODS Retrospective review was conducted to identify adult (≥ 18y) patients seen by orthopaedic hand surgeons at a single academic tertiary care hospital who had completed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT score at the same visit. For those with multiple visits, only one randomly selected visit was included in the analyses. Pearson's correlation was calculated to determine the linear relationship between the scores. Linkage from PF to UE was performed utilizing several commonly utilized equating models (identity, mean, linear, equipercentile and circle-arc methods). The performance of the models was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) between observed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and estimated PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores generated using the model as well as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The model chosen as the 'best' was further assessed for population invariance using root expected mean squared difference (REMSD) where < 0.08 were considered good. RESULTS Of 10,081 included patients, mean age was 48.3 (SD = 17.0), and 54% were female (5,477/10,081). Mean UE CAT v1.2 and PF CAT scores were 37 (SD = 9.8) and 46 (SD = 10.0), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.70). All methods performed acceptably (ICC ≥ 0.66 and RMSE < = 7.52 for all). The equipercentile method had the highest ICC (ICC = 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71)) while the mean and circle arc methods had the lowest RMSE. The circle arc method is the most reliable with the smallest standard error and has satisfactory population invariance across age group (REMSD 0.065) and sex (REMSD 0.036). CONCLUSIONS Crosswalk tables to be used for bidirectional conversion between scores were created. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda J Rogers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Joshua R Daryoush
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Chong Zhang
- Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Amy Cizik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Angela P Presson
- Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Nikolas H Kazmers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cizik AM, Zhang C, Presson AP, Randall D, Kazmers NH. Linking QuickDASH and PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer-Adaptive Test Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study. J Hand Surg Am 2024:S0363-5023(24)00172-2. [PMID: 38795102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hand and upper-extremity surgery patients using measures such as the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), as well as general measures including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function domain via a Computer-Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE CAT), has become commonplace. The aim of this study was to link, for crosswalking, the qDASH measure to both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT (v1.2 and v2.0). METHODS We included 18,944 hand and upper-extremity patients who completed both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT and the qDASH at the same clinical encounter. Shoulder pathology was excluded. Score linkage was performed using the R package equate, and multiple equating models (linear regression, identity, mean, linear, equipercentile, and circle-arc models) were used to establish crosswalk tables. RESULTS Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores were 38.2 (SD = 23.1) and 36.6 (SD = 9.8), respectively. Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 scores were 37.3 (SD = 21.8) and 38.3 (SD = 10.4), respectively. Pearson correlations had very strong linear relationships between the qDASH and the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 (r = -0.83 [-0.84, -0.92] and r = -0.80 [-0.81, -0.80], respectively). For the equipercentile equating models, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) had very strong positive relationships to linking measures with ICC = 0.85 (0.84, 0.86) for the qDASH-UE CAT v1.2 crosswalk and ICC = 0.83 (0.82, 0.84) for the qDASH-UE CAT v2.0 crosswalk. CONCLUSIONS The linkages establish crosswalk tables using equipercentile equating models to convert the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and v2.0 scores to the qDASH and vice versa. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study provides crosswalk tables for commonly collected PROMs in hand surgery, increasing the comparability of results between centers using different PROMs to study the same conditions or treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Cizik
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | - Chong Zhang
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Angela P Presson
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Dustin Randall
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Nikolas H Kazmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stirling PH, McEachan JE, Rodrigues JN, Geoghegan L, Harrison CJ. Modified Scoring of the QuickDASH Can Achieve Previously-unattained Interval-level Measurement in Dupuytren Disease and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5372. [PMID: 38333027 PMCID: PMC10852374 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Background Rasch measurement theory can be used to identify scales within questionnaires and to map responses to more precise continuous scales. The aim of this article was to use RMT to refine the scoring of the QuickDASH in patients with Dupuytren disease and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods Data were collected between 2013 and 2019 from a single center in the UK. Preoperative QuickDASH responses from patients diagnosed with Dupuytren disease and CTS were used. RMT was used to reduce the number of items in the QuickDASH and examine the reliability and validity of each subscale. Results The preoperative QuickDASH responses of 750 patients with Dupuytren disease and 1916 patients with CTS were used. The median age of participants was 61 years, and 46% were men. Exploratory factor analysis suggested two distinct subscales within the QuickDASH: task items 1-6 and symptom items 9-11. These items were fitted to the Rasch model, and disordered response thresholds were collapsed. In Dupuytren disease, the two worst responses or each item were disordered. After collapsing these options, good Rasch model fit was demonstrated. CTS responses fitted without modification. Item targeting was more appropriate for CTS than Dupuytren disease. Conclusions This study proposes a modification to the scoring system for the QuickDASH that provides high-quality, continuous, and condition-specific scales for the QuickDASH. The identification of distinct subscales within the QuickDASH can be used to identify distinct improvements in hand function and/or symptoms in previous, current, and future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H.C. Stirling
- From the Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK
- Fife Virtual Hand Clinic, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK
| | - Jane E. McEachan
- From the Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK
- Fife Virtual Hand Clinic, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK
| | - Jeremy N. Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Luke Geoghegan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Conrad J. Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bernstein DN, Bakshi CV, Lans J, Garg R, Bhashyam AR, Tobert DG. PROMIS Global Physical Health Subscale Strongly Correlates and Performs Similarly to the QuickDASH in Hand and Upper Extremity Patients. Hand (N Y) 2023:15589447231211603. [PMID: 37961854 DOI: 10.1177/15589447231211603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) is a validated, static hand and upper extremity patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) commonly used. However, with the growth of PROM implementation across orthopedic and plastic surgery clinics, it is beneficial to determine whether a more general PROM can be used to capture the same insights. This would ease implementation broadly. There is a paucity of literature assessing whether the QuickDASH and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 are correlated and perform similarly. METHODS Between June 2016 and December 2020, hand and upper extremity patients seeking care at clinics associated with a single quaternary academic medical center were identified. Those who completed the PROMIS Global-10 and QuickDASH as part of routine care were identified. The PROMIS Global-10 is divided into the PROMIS Global Physical Health and PROMIS Global Mental Health subscores. Spearman rho (ρ) correlations were calculated across PROMs, and ceiling and floor effects were determined. RESULTS Across the 18 744 included patients, there was a strong correlation and strong-moderate correlation found between the QuickDASH and PROMIS Global Physical Health (ρ = 0.70, P < .001) and PROMIS Global Mental Health (ρ = 0.69, P < .001), respectively. Although small, QuickDASH demonstrates the worst floor effect (2.6%, [n = 478]), whereas PROMIS Global Mental Health demonstrated a much more notable ceiling effect (11%, [n = 2034]). CONCLUSIONS The PROMIS Global-10 can be used to assess the functional status of patients presenting for hand and upper extremity concerns, while also capturing aspects of mental health. The PROMIS Global-10 may ease PROM implementation broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rohit Garg
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
McEachan JE, Jerome JTJ. From Art to Science: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hand Surgery. J Hand Microsurg 2023; 15:161-164. [PMID: 37397509 PMCID: PMC10310449 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E. McEachan
- Fife Hand Clinic, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, United Kingdom
| | - J. Terrence Jose Jerome
- Department of Orthopedics, Hand, and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Olympia Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ernst SCK, Steinbeck V, Busse R, Pross C. Toward System-Wide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Framework for Countries, States, and Regions. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1539-1547. [PMID: 35610145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop a framework facilitating (1) the maturity assessment of healthcare systems regarding patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation and (2) the comparison of different healthcare systems' PROM implementation levels to guide discussions and derive lessons for regional, state-level, and national PROM initiatives. METHODS Guided by the grounded theory methodology, a PROM healthcare system implementation framework was developed following multiple steps. Based on interviews with 28 experts from 12 countries and a literature review, a framework was drafted and refined through 29 additional validation interviews. RESULTS The resulting framework comprises 5 implementation stages along 7 dimensions. Implementation stages range from "first experimentation" to "system-wide adoption and a vibrant ecosystem." The dimensions are grouped into patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement and PRO utilization, the former with the dimensions "scope and condition coverage," "metric and process standardization," and "tools and information technology-based solutions" and the latter with "patient empowerment and clinical decision support," "reporting and quality improvement," and "rewarding and contracting." The "culture and stakeholder involvement" dimension connects both groups. Although a concerted implementation approach across dimensions can be observed in advanced countries, others show a more uneven adoption. CONCLUSIONS The framework and its preliminary application to different healthcare systems demonstrate (1) the importance of coherent progress across complementing dimensions and (2) the relevance of PROM integration across clinical specialties and care sectors to strengthen patient-centered care. Overall, the framework can facilitate dialogues between stakeholders to analyze the current PROM implementation status and strategies to advance it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie-Christin Kornelia Ernst
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Viktoria Steinbeck
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard Busse
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Pross
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bringing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Into Practice: A Review of the Latest Developments in PROM Use in the Evaluation and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY GLOBAL ONLINE 2022. [PMID: 37521564 PMCID: PMC10382866 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As health care systems globally shift toward optimizing value, defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent across a full cycle of care, there has been increasing focus on using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to gauge success. Patient-reported outcome measures are validated questionnaires that allow patients to share their health status across several domains (eg, pain or physical function). This trend has been particularly notable in hand surgery, with PROM use investigated for many common hand conditions, including carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, trigger finger, osteoarthritis, and wrist ganglion. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in the use of PROM instruments, including the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, for the evaluation and treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The considerable progress in establishing PROMs for use in carpal tunnel syndrome is reviewed, and future improvements are proposed to standardize PROM use and bring PROMs into day-to-day clinical practice for individualized patient treatment decision-making and counseling.
Collapse
|
9
|
Harrison C, Clelland AD, Davis TRC, Scammell BE, Zhang W, Russell P, Fullilove S, Chakrabarti I, Davidson D, Rodrigues J. A comparative analysis of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for the DASH and QuickDASH scores in Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2022; 47:750-754. [PMID: 35225047 DOI: 10.1177/17531934221081803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The QuickDASH is a short-form version of the DASH questionnaire, the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure in hand surgery. Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing (MCAT) can produce shorter and more precise testing than static short forms, like QuickDASH. We used DASH responses from 507 patients with Dupuytren's disease to develop a MCAT. The algorithm was evaluated in a Monte Carlo simulation, where the standard error of measurement (SEm) of scores obtained from the 11-item QuickDASH was compared with scores obtained from an MCAT that could administer up to 11 items from the full 30-item DASH. The MCAT asked a mean of 8.51 items (SD 2.93) and 265/1000 simulated respondents needed to complete ≤five items. Median SEms were better for DASH MCAT: 0.299 (hand function) and 0.256 (sensory symptoms) versus 0.320 and 0.290, respectively, for QuickDASH. Our study showed that the DASH MCAT can produce more precise DASH measurement than the QuickDASH, from fewer items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tim R C Davis
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brigitte E Scammell
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.,Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Weiya Zhang
- Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter Russell
- Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Sue Fullilove
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaw AV, Holmes DG, Rodrigues JN, Lane JC, Gardiner MD, Wormald JC. Outcome measurement in adult flexor tendon injury: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:1455-1466. [PMID: 35219612 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Defining the optimal, evidence-based management of flexor tendon injury remains challenging. Lack of consensus on which measures to use to assess the outcome of interventions is a key issue, especially with regard to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review defines the landscape of outcome measurement in studies on interventions for flexor tendon injuries to guide future research. METHODS A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted using bespoke search strategies applied to MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL and AMED. A protocol was developed and registered prospectively (CRD42020186780). We identified all studies describing adult patients undergoing interventions for acute hand flexor tendon injuries. RESULTS Of the 4844 studies, 114 studies met the final inclusion criteria for evaluating the outcomes of 8127 participants with 9071 injured digits. Studies included 24 randomised controlled trials, 19 cohort studies and 61 case series. Nine different PROMs were used in 24 studies (22%): three site-specific PROMs, one generic quality-of-life measure and four visual analogue scales. Clinician-reported outcome measures were used in 103 studies (96%), such as the range of motion reported in 102 studies (94%). Adverse outcomes were reported in 96 studies (89%), with the most frequently reported adverse outcomes being tendon rupture and infection. Re-operation was reported in 21 studies (19%). The most frequently reported health economic outcome measure was the length of work absence, reported in ten studies (9%). CONCLUSIONS There is variability in the use of outcome measures used to study interventions for flexor tendon injuries. An independent systematic review of the psychometric properties of the identified outcome measures and a specific multi-stakeholder consensus process may support optimal choice and standardisation for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail V Shaw
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Gw Holmes
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy N Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, United Kingdom; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England.
| | - Jennifer Ce Lane
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew D Gardiner
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Cr Wormald
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The HAND-Q: Psychometrics of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Clinical and Research Applications. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e3998. [PMID: 35186611 PMCID: PMC8849439 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The perspective of the patient in measuring the outcome of their hand treatment is of key importance. We developed a hand-specific patient-reported outcome measure to provide a means to measure outcomes and experiences of care from the patient perspective, that is, HAND-Q.
Collapse
|
12
|
Factors Associated with the Development, Progression, and Outcome of Dupuytren Disease Treatment: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:753e-763e. [PMID: 34705778 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The factors typically considered to be associated with Dupuytren disease have been described, such as those in the "Dupuytren diathesis." However, the quality of studies describing them has not been appraised. This systematic review aimed to analyze the evidence for all factors investigated for potential association with the development, progression, outcome of treatment, or recurrence of Dupuytren disease. METHODS A systematic review of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant methodology up to September of 2019. Articles were screened in duplicate. Prognostic studies were quality assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Study tool. RESULTS This study identified 2301 records; 51 met full inclusion criteria reporting data related to 54,491 patients with Dupuytren disease. In total, 46 candidate factors associated with the development of Dupuytren disease were identified. There was inconsistent evidence between the association of Dupuytren disease and the presence of "classic" diathesis factors. The quality of included studies varied, and the generalizability of studies was low. There was little evidence describing the factors associated with functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review challenges conventional notions of diathesis factors. Traditional diathesis factors are associated with disease development and recurrence, although they are not significantly associated with poor outcome following intervention based on the current evidence.
Collapse
|
13
|
Long C, Beres LK, Wu AW, Giladi AM. Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:1711-1718. [PMID: 34533759 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02999-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in a hand and upper extremity clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. METHODS We conducted 12 h of direct observation of PROM completion (October-November, 2020). Ethnographic observation memos were qualitatively analyzed for barriers and facilitators using rapid thematic analysis. Informed by observation findings, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with mixed-literacy patients, caregivers, and clinic staff to understand the patient experience when completing PROMs (November 2020-March 2021). We identified initial themes through inductive and deductive framework analysis and validated findings through subsequent interviews with member-checking. RESULTS We identified nine patient-level factors that influence PROM completion: platform design, print literacy, health literacy, technology literacy, language proficiency, physical functioning, vision, cognitive functioning, and time. CONCLUSIONS There are multiple distinct patient-level factors that affect PROM completion. Failure to consider these factors in PROM design and implementation may lower completion rates or prevent accurate completion, undermining PROM validity. Because certain factors affect minority populations at disproportionate rates, this may also contribute to existing health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Long
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura K Beres
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Albert W Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aviram M Giladi
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hama S, Okada M, Yokoi T, Uemura T, Nakamura H. Pain and numbness one month after carpal tunnel release predict patient-reported outcome measures at sixth months. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2021; 56:167-171. [PMID: 34324405 DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1953041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
A number of outcome predictors for carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have been reported. However, some predictors are controversial, and few studies have referred to the early postoperative outcome prognostic factors after CTR. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pain and numbness at 1 month post-CTR were early postoperative predictors of clinical outcomes 6 months after surgery. Pain and numbness were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and at 1 month post-surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) measure, the Hand20 questionnaire and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), were recorded for each patient 6 months after surgery. The BCTQ consisted of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the VAS scores and PROMs. We retrospectively identified 93 patients who underwent open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years, and 67 patients (72.0%) were female. Sixty patients were treated by OCTR (65.0%). With multivariable linear regression analysis, we found that pain and numbness, evaluated with VAS 1 month post-surgery had significant correlations with QDASH, Hand20, SSS and FSS 6 months after surgery. In conclusion, pain and numbness 1 month after CTR predict PROMs at 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunpei Hama
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Okada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Yokoi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Uemura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nakamura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|