A PERSONAL SIXTY-YEAR TOUR OF GENETICS AND MEDICINE

The multifaceted roles of cohesin in cancer

The cohesin complex controls faithful chromosome segregation by pairing sister chromatids after DNA replication until mitosis. In addition, it is crucial for hierarchal three-dimensional organization of the genome, transcription regulation and maintaining DNA integrity. The core complex subunits SMC1A, SMC3, STAG1/2, and RAD21 as well as its modulators, have been found to be recurrently mutated in human cancers. The mechanisms by which cohesin mutations trigger cancer development and disease progression are still poorly understood. Since cohesin is involved in a range of chromosome-related processes, the outcome of cohesin mutations in cancer is complex. Herein, we discuss recent discoveries regarding cohesin that provide new insight into its role in tumorigenesis.

13q interstitial deletion in a moroccan child with hereditary retinoblastoma and intellectual disability: A case report

Retinoblastoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in children (incidence:1/15,000 to 1/20,000 births), with a sex ratio of 1,5/1. Retinoblastoma, in its inherited form, is a disease caused by a syndrome of genetic predisposition to cancer. The RB1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, is localized at 13q14. This case report shows the indication of the cytogenetic analysis in the management of patients with retinoblastoma, and the interest of a genetic counseling. We report the medical observation of a five and a half years old patient who was followed in the medical genetic's department for intellectual disability: associated with facial dysmorphia. The cytogenetic study objectified the presence of an interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 13: 46, XX, del (13) (q14q22). A genetic counseling, with study of the karyotype of the parents is planned, specially to search for a balanced insertion: 13q14 insertion and deletion. In addition, the patient has been followed since the age of 9 months at the pediatric ophthalmology department for a bilateral retinoblastoma, in remission. A subject carry in constitutional mutation of the RB1 gene has a greater than 90% risk of developing retinoblastoma, and moreover has a genetic predisposition to secondary tumors. This medical observation shows the benefit of the constitutional cytogenetic study for patients with retinoblastoma, in particular in the event of bilateral retinoblastoma. The monitoring of psychomotor development must supplement the ophthalmological monitoring of these patients, with a systematic genetic counseling.

The dark side of cohesin: the carcinogenic point of view

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells and how it arises is still not completely understood. Correct chromosome segregation is a pre-requisite for preserving genome integrity. Cohesin helps to ensure faithful chromosome segregation during cell cycle, however, much evidence regarding its functions have come to light over the last few years and suggest that cohesin plays multiple roles in the maintenance of genome stability. Here we review our rapidly increasing knowledge on the involvement of cohesin pathway in genome stability and cancer.

Retinoblastoma and the genetic theory of cancer: an old paradigm trying to survive to the evidence

Retinoblastoma (Rb) is considered to represent the prototype of cancer linked to the sequential loss or inactivation of both alleles of a so-called “tumor suppressor gene”, the Rb1 gene. The pathogenetic mechanism behind this tumor was first hypothesized by Knudson in 1971 and further confirmed by others who identified the Rb1 gene whose loss or inactivation was claimed to be responsible for the disease. However, after about four decades of continuous research in the field of molecular biology, the evidence behind the role of the Rb1 gene in Rb appears to be seriously flawed in the light of epidemiological, biological, and clinical evidences. This editorial summarizes the inconsistencies on this subject. Nevertheless, the molecular biology establishment still adheres to the biased view of the genetic origin of Rb and other cancers, and hardly any alternative explanations are taken into account.

Recent advances in basic and clinical nanomedicine

Nanomedicine is a global business enterprise. Industry and governments clearly are beginning to envision nanomedicine's enormous potential. A clear definition of nanotechnology is an issue that requires urgent attention. This problem exists because nanotechnology represents a cluster of technologies, each of which may have different characteristics and applications. Although numerous novel nanomedicine-related applications are under development or nearing commercialization, the process of converting basic research in nanomedicine into commercially viable products will be long and difficult. Although realization of the full potential of nanomedicine may be years or decades away, recent advances in nanotechnology-related drug delivery, diagnosis, and drug development are beginning to change the landscape of medicine. Site-specific targeted drug delivery and personalized medicine are just a few concepts that are on the horizon.

Retinoblastoma epidemiology: does the evidence matter?

It has been proposed that retinoblastoma is 'caused' by two sequential mutations affecting the RB1 gene, but this is a rather outdated view of cancer aetiology that does not take into account a large amount of new acquisitions such as chromosomal and epigenetic alterations. Retinoblastoma remains probably the only cancer in which the rather simplistic 'two hit' mutational model is still considered of value, although cancer is known to be associated with genomic and microsatellite instability, defects of the DNA mismatch repair system, alterations of DNA methylation and hystone acethylation/deacethylation, and aneuploidy. Moreover, as it is shown herein, the predictions made by the 'two hit' model, are not fulfilled by the clinical and epidemiological data reported so far. Moreover, while the role of mutational events in cancer has been largely questioned in the more recent literature, no serious effort has been done to investigate the role of epigenetic alterations and aneuploidy in retinoblastoma. Through the analysis of the specialised literature and a set of original epidemiological and biological data concerning retinoblastoma, the authors illustrate the evidences arguing against the 'two hit' hypothesis and propose that epigenetic factors and aneuploidy play central roles in the disease.

Does the evidence matter in medicine? The retinoblastoma paradigm

Retinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common intraocular malignant tumour in childhood, with an incidence of 1 in 15,000 live births. Complete information on this rare tumour can be easily accessed through the internet, although many aspect concerning the aetiology and pathogenesis of the disease, are still controversial. The "two hit" theory, formulated in 1971 to explain the variegated clinical expression of the disease, is based on the idea that single gene mutation may determine the development of cancer. However, this view does not take into account the most recent evidences showing the role of aneuploidy and chromosome instability in cancer. Also, a number of other genes and epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the genesis of retinoblastoma. More importantly, the "two hit" theory makes predictions, concerning the age distribution of the tumour, its mode of "transmission" (hereditary retinoblastoma), and its pathogenesis, which are not fulfilled by the clinical reality. Overall, the "two hit" theory represents a rather simplistic and outdated model to explain tumour development and clinical evolution of retinoblastoma.

[Human cytogenetics. From 1956 to 2006]

The correct enumeration of human chromosomes, only established in 1956, has marked the starting point of the modern cytogenetics. The introduction of banding techniques, then of in situ hybridization techniques, and now of genomic microarray technology allowed a dramatic development of cytogenetics of which the main applications to basic and medical research are evoked in this review.

The role of mutation in the new cancer paradigm

The almost universal belief that cancer is caused by mutation may gradually be giving way to the belief that cancer begins as a cellular adaptation that involves the local epigenetic silencing of various genes. In my own interpretation of the new epigenetic paradigm, the genes epigenetically suppressed are genes that normally serve in post-embryonic life to suppress and keep suppressed those other genes upon which embryonic development depends. Those other genes, if not silenced or suppressed in the post-embryonic animal, become, I suggest, the oncogenes that are the basis of neoplasia.

Mutations that occur in silenced genes supposedly go unrepaired and are, therefore, postulated to accumulate, but such mutations probably play little or no causative role in neoplasia because they occur in already epigenetically silenced genes. These mutations probably often serve to make the silencing, and therefore the cancer, epigenetically irreversible.