Qualitative and Quantitative Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging Helps Subtype Hepatocellular Adenomas

Beta-Catenin-Mutated Hepatocellular Adenomas at Hepatobiliary Phase MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (β-HCAs) can appear iso- to hyperintense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the relatively lower prevalence of β-HCAs, prior studies had limited power to show statistically significant differences in the HBP signal intensity between different subtypes.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of HBP MRI to discriminate β-HCA from other subtypes.

STUDY TYPE

Systemic review and meta-analysis.

POPULATION

Ten original studies were included, yielding 266 patients with 397 HCAs (9%, 36/397 β-HCAs and 91%, 361/397 non-β-HCAs).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T and 3.0 T, HBP.

ASSESSMENT

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, for all articles reporting HBP signal intensity in patients with histopathologically proven HCA subtypes. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Heterogeneity estimates were assessed with I2 heterogeneity index. Meta-regression (mixed-effect model) was used to test for differences in the prevalence of HBP signal between HCA groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

HBP iso- to hyperintensity was associated with β-HCAs (pooled prevalence was 72.3% in β-HCAs and 6.3% in non-β-HCAs). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72.3% (95% confidence interval 54.1-85.3) and 93.7% (93.8-97.7), respectively. Specificity had substantial heterogeneity with I2 of 83% due to one study, but not for sensitivity (I2  = 0). After excluding this study, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% (59.6-88.8) and 94.1% (88.9-96.9), with no substantial heterogeneity. One study had high risk of bias for patient selection and two studies were rated unclear for two domains.

DATA CONCLUSION

Iso- to hyperintensity at HBP MRI may help to distinguish β-HCA subtype from other HCAs with high specificity. However, there was heterogeneity in the pooled estimates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Gd-EOB MRI for HCC subtype differentiation in a western population according to the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for noninvasive subtype differentiation of HCCs according to the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors in a western population.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 262 resected lesions in 240 patients with preoperative Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI. Subtypes were assigned by two pathologists. Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI datasets were assessed by two radiologists for qualitative and quantitative imaging features, including imaging features defined in LI-RADS v2018 and area of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) iso- to hyperintensity.

RESULTS

The combination of non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement with non-peripheral portal venous washout was more common in "not otherwise specified" (nos-ST) (88/168, 52%) than other subtypes, in particular macrotrabecular massive (mt-ST) (3/15, 20%), chromophobe (ch-ST) (1/8, 13%), and scirrhous subtypes (sc-ST) (2/9, 22%) (p = 0.035). Macrovascular invasion was associated with mt-ST (5/16, p = 0.033) and intralesional steatosis with steatohepatitic subtype (sh-ST) (28/32, p < 0.001). Predominant iso- to hyperintensity in the HBP was only present in nos-ST (16/174), sh-ST (3/33), and clear cell subtypes (cc-ST) (3/13) (p = 0.031). Associations were found for the following non-imaging parameters: age and sex, as patients with fibrolamellar subtype (fib-ST) were younger (median 44 years (19-66), p < 0.001) and female (4/5, p = 0.023); logarithm of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was elevated in the mt-ST (median 397 µg/l (74-5370), p < 0.001); type II diabetes mellitus was more frequent in the sh-ST (20/33, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-EOB-MRI reproduces findings reported in the literature for extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI and CT and may be a valuable tool for noninvasive HCC subtype differentiation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Better characterization of the heterogeneous phenotypes of HCC according to the revised WHO classification potentially improves both diagnostic accuracy and the precision of therapeutic stratification for HCC.

KEY POINTS

• Previously reported imaging features of common subtypes in CT and MRI enhanced with extracellular contrast agents are reproducible with Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI. • While uncommon, predominant iso- to hyperintensity in the HBP was observed only in NOS, clear cell, and steatohepatitic subtypes. • Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI offers imaging features that are of value for HCC subtype differentiation according to the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors.

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma using qualitative and quantitative imaging features and classification and regression tree analysis

PURPOSE

To assess qualitative and quantitative analysis of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging (MRI) and assess the performance of classification and regression tree analysis for the differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our local ethics committee. One hundred seventy patients suspected of having FNH or HCA underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. The reference standard was either pathology or follow-up imaging. Two readers reviewed images to identify qualitative imaging features and measure signal intensity on unenhanced, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase images. For quantitative analysis, contrast enhancement ratio (CER), lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC), signal intensity ratio (SIR), and relative signal enhancement ratio (RSER) were calculated. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was developed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 97 FNHs and 43 HCAs. For qualitative analysis, the T1 signal intensity on the hepatobiliary phase provided the highest overall classification performance (91.9% sensitivity, 90.1% specificity, and 90.9% accuracy). For quantitative analysis, RSER in the hepatobiliary phase with a threshold of 0.723 provided the highest classification performance (92.6% sensitivity and 89.4% specificity) to differentiate FNHs from HCAs. A CART model based on five qualitative imaging features provided an accuracy of 94.4% (95% confidence interval 90.0-98.9%).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase provides high diagnostic performance as demonstrated in quantitative and qualitative analysis in differentiation of FNH and HCA, supported by a CART decision model.

Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the β-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all β-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. ^© RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Hepatic Adenoma Subtypes on Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. Accumulating evidence indicates that hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) may have a higher frequency of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) iso- or hyperintensity than previously reported. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proportion of HCA that shows iso- or hyperintensity in the HBP of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, stratified by HCA subtype (HNF1a-inactivated [H-HCA], inflammatory [I-HCA], β-catenin-activated [B-HCA], and unclassified [U-HCA] HCA), and to assess the diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from HCA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through February 14, 2022, for articles reporting HBP signal intensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI among pathologically proven HCAs, stratified by subtype. The pooled proportion of HBP iso- or hyperintensity was determined for each subtype and compared using metaregression. Diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating FNH from all HCA subtypes combined and from B-HCA and U-HCA combined was assessed using bivariate modeling. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Twenty-eight studies (12 original investigations, 16 case reports or case series) were included, yielding 364 patients with 410 HCAs (112 H-HCAs, 203 I-HCAs, 33 B-HCAs, 62 U-HCAs). Pooled proportion of HBP iso- or hyperintensity was 14% (95% CI, 4-26%) among all HCAs, 0% (95% CI, 0-2%) among H-HCAs, 11% (95% CI, 0-29%) among U-HCAs, 14% (95% CI, 2-31%) among I-HCAs, and 59% (95% CI, 26-88%) among B-HCAs; metaregression showed significant difference among subtypes (p < .001). In four studies reporting diagnostic performance information, HBP iso- or hyperintensity had sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 57-100%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 82-94%) for differentiating FNH from all HCA subtypes and sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 53-100%) and specificity of 65% (95% CI, 44-80%) for differentiating FNH from B-HCA or U-HCA. CONCLUSION. HCA subtypes other than H-HCA show proportions of HBP iso- or hyperintensity ranging from 11% (U-HCA) to 59% (B-HCA). Low prevalence of B-HCA has contributed to prior reports of high diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating FNH from HCA. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiologists should recognize the low specificity of HBP iso- or hyperintensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiating FNH from certain HCA subtypes.

HBP-enhancing hepatocellular adenomas and how to discriminate them from FNH in Gd-EOB MRI

BACKGROUND

Recent studies provide evidence that hepatocellular  adenomas  (HCAs) frequently take up gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB) during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The purpose of our study was to investigate how to differentiate between Gd-EOB-enhancing HCAs and focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs). We therefore retrospectively included 40 HCAs classified as HBP Gd-EOB-enhancing lesions from a sample of 100 histopathologically proven HCAs in 65 patients. These enhancing HCAs were matched retrospectively with 28 FNH lesions (standard of reference: surgical resection). Two readers (experienced abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical data) reviewed the images evaluating morphologic features and subjectively scoring Gd-EOB uptake (25-50%, 50-75% and 75-100%) for each lesion. Quantitative lesion-to-liver enhancement was measured in arterial, portal venous (PV), transitional and HBP. Additionally, multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Subjective scoring of intralesional Gd-EOB uptake showed the highest discriminatory accuracies (AUC: 0.848 (R#1); 0.920 (R#2)-p < 0.001) with significantly higher uptake scores assigned to FNHs (Cut-off: 75%-100%). Typical lobulation and presence of a central scar in FNH achieved an accuracy of 0.750 or higher in at least one reader (lobulation-AUC: 0.809 (R#1); 0.736 (R#2); central scar-AUC: 0.595 (R#1); 0.784 (R#2)). The multivariate regression emphasized the discriminatory power of the Gd-EOB scoring (p = 0.001/OR:22.15 (R#1) and p < 0.001/OR:99.12 (R#2). The lesion-to-liver ratio differed significantly between FNH and HCA in the PV phase and HBP (PV: 132.9 (FNH) and 110.2 (HCA), p = 0.048 and HBP: 110.3 (FNH) and 39.2 (HCA), p < 0.001)), while the difference was not significant in arterial and transitional contrast phases (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Even in HBP-enhancing HCA, characterization of Gd-EOB uptake was found to provide the strongest discriminatory power in differentiating HCA from FNH. Furthermore, a lobulated appearance and a central scar are more frequently seen in FNH than in HCA.

A systematic review on the complications and management of hepatic adenomas: a call for a new approach

Hepatic adenomas are benign hepatic lesions with heterogeneous characteristics. Awareness of complications, including haemorrhage and malignant transformation, has improved alongside a concurrent rise in their detection. Monitoring and management guidelines, however, remain inconsistent. This systematic review analyses the natural history of hepatic adenomas, and existing and novel risk factors associated with haemorrhage and malignant transformation. Results of this systematic review commonly identified male sex, and the beta-catenin histopathological hepatic adenoma subtype, as risk factors for malignant transformation, whilst those associated with haemorrhage included lesion size and number, exophytic nature, and recent hormone use. Overall, females demonstrated higher rates of haemorrhage, whilst males exhibited a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development. This systematic review highlights that tumour size and subtype may not be as characteristically linked with complications as previously thought. We have additionally reported novel risk factors contributing to development of hepatic adenoma-related complications. We conclude by highlighting the risk of taking a conservative approach to seemingly low-risk lesions and suggest revised practice guidelines.

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

Hepatobiliary MR contrast agents are useful to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images can discriminate between benign and malignant liver lesions, but it is unclear if this approach can be used in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Thus, we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of HBP images in patients with BCS.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of BCS and focal liver lesions on hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging (HBCA-MRI) from 2000 to 2019. MR images were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of the lesions. Patient and lesion characteristics were recorded, focusing on HBP imaging features.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (mean 35 ± 11 years old [13-65]; 21 women [81%] 35 ± 12 years old [13-65]; 5 men [19%] 36 ± 10 years old [19-44]) with 99 benign liver lesions and 12 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were analyzed. Patients with HCC were significantly older than those with benign lesions (mean 50 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 9 years old, p = 0.003), with higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (3/4 [75%] vs. 1/22 [5%] with AFP >15 ng/ml, p <0.001). Homogeneous hypointense signals were identified on HBP in 14 lesions, including 12/12 (100%) HCCs, and 2/99 (2%) benign lesions (p <0.001). Most benign liver lesions showed either peripheral (n = 52/99 [53%]) or homogeneous hyperintensity (n = 23/99 [23%]) on HBP. Lesions with signal hypointensity on HBP in patients with AFP serum levels >15 ng/ml were all HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Most benign lesions showed homogeneous or peripheral hyperintensity on HBP images while all HCCs were homogeneously hypointense. HBP images are helpful to differentiate between benign lesions and HCCs and outperform other sequences. They should be systematically acquired for the characterization of focal lesions in patients with BCS.

LAY SUMMARY

Hepatobiliary phase imaging is an approach that has recently been shown to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in the liver. However, it was not known whether this imaging approach could be used effectively in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Herein, we have shown that hepatobiliary phase imaging appears to be useful for differentiating between benign and malignant liver lesions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Limited added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound over B-mode for the subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas

PURPOSE

To compare the features of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes (HCAs) in B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHOD

Thirty-three patients (31 women [94 %] and two men [6%], median age [Q1-Q3] 43.5 years old [35-51]) with 44 pathologically proven and subtyped HCAs (including 29 inflammatory HCAs [I-HCA] and 15 HNF1-α inactivated HCAs [H-HCA]) who underwent CEUS were included. The features of HCA on B-mode and CEUS were independently reviewed by two radiologists and compared between HCA subtypes.

RESULTS

I-HCAs were mostly hypoechoic (23/29, 79 %) or isoechoic (4/29, 14 %) with B-mode. Twelve of them (41 %) were heterogeneous. All H-HCAs except one demonstrated homogeneous hyperechogenicity (93 %) (p = 0.001). Moderate or marked liver steatosis was only observed in I-HCAs (12/29, 41 %) (p = 0.001). Arterial hyperenhancement was observed on CEUS in 27/29 (93 %) I-HCAs and in 14/15 (93 %) H-HCAs (p=0.98). Washout was present in 6/29 (21 %) I-HCAs and 1/15 (7%) H-HCAs (p=0.27). A total of 23/29 (79 %) I-HCAs and 15/15 (100 %) HCAs were homogeneous on portal and delayed phase acquisitions (p=0.04). The specificity for identifying an H-HCA was 100 % when the lesion was homogeneous and hyperechoic on B-mode, and the sensibility to rule out an H-HCA was 100 % if neither of these two features was present in a liver with obvious steatosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CEUS features, especially enhancement patterns, do not significantly differ between HCA subtypes. When HCA is suspected on CEUS, B-mode features should be considered, and a combination of lesion hyperechogenicity, homogeneity and the absence of obvious liver steatosis may be useful to distinguish H-HCAs from I-HCAs.

Hepatocellular adenomas: is there additional value in using Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI for subtype differentiation?

Purpose

To differentiate subtypes of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) based on enhancement characteristics in gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight patients with 79 histopathologically proven HCAs who underwent Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI were enrolled (standard of reference: surgical resection). Two blinded radiologists performed quantitative measurements (lesion-to-liver enhancement) and evaluated qualitative imaging features. Inter-reader variability was tested. Advanced texture analysis was used to evaluate lesion heterogeneity three-dimensionally.

Results

Overall, there were 19 (24%) hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1a-mutated (HHCAs), 37 (47%) inflammatory (IHCAs), 5 (6.5%) b-catenin-activated (bHCA), and 18 (22.5%) unclassified (UHCAs) adenomas. In the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), 49.5% (39/79) of all adenomas were rated as hypointense and 50.5% (40/79) as significantly enhancing (defined as > 25% intralesional GD-EOB uptake). 82.5% (33/40) of significantly enhancing adenomas were IHCAs, while only 4% (1/40) were in the HHCA subgroup (p < 0.001). When Gd-EOB uptake behavior was considered in conjunction with established MRI features (binary regression model), the area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.785 to 0.953 for differentiation of IHCA (atoll sign + hyperintensity), from 0.859 to 0.903 for bHCA (scar + hyperintensity), and from 0.899 to 0.957 for HHCA (steatosis + hypointensity). Three-dimensional region of interest (3D ROI) analysis showed significantly increased voxel heterogeneity for IHCAs (p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Gd-EOB MRI is of added value for subtype differentiation of HCAs and reliably identifies the typical heterogeneous HBP uptake of IHCAs. Diagnostic accuracy can be improved significantly by the combined analysis of established morphologic MR appearances and intralesional Gd-EOB uptake.

Key Points

•Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI is of added value for subtype differentiation of HCA.

•IHCA and HHCA can be identified reliably based on their typical Gd-EOB uptake patterns, and accuracy increases significantly when additionally taking established MR appearances into account.

•The small numbers of bHCAs and UHCAs remain the source of diagnostic uncertainty.

Enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on MR imaging performed with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus other Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs): An intraindividual comparison

PURPOSE

To conduct an intraindividual comparison of the enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on dynamic MRI study obtained following the injection of Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and other gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).

METHOD

This is a retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study conducted in a single institution. A search of medical records between 2008 and 2017 revealed 17 patients (all females) with at least one pathologically-proven HCA who underwent liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA and another GBCA within 1 year. Enhancement of each lesion on hepatic arterial (HAP), portal venous (PVP), 2 min and 4-5 minutes phases was subjectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists. Lesions were categorized as hyper-, iso- or hypointense compared to the surrounding liver parenchyma. The presence of a peripheral pseudocapsule was also recorded. The differences in lesion enhancement were assessed using the McNemar Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final population included 35 HCAs (83% inflammatory subtype). There was no significant difference in lesion size (P = 0.708) and enhancement on HAP (P = 0.625) or PVP (P = 0.125). HCAs showed more frequently hypointensity on 2 min (13/35 vs. 1/35, P < 0.001) and 4-5 minutes (P < 0.001) images obtained after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to those obtained after other GBCAs. A pseudocapsule was more frequently noted after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA (13/35 vs 1/35, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement pattern of HCA differs significantly after the injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to other GBCAs. Lesion hypointensity on 2 min and 4-5 minutes images is more frequent when using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

MRI for characterization of benign hepatocellular tumors on hepatobiliary phase: the added value of in-phase imaging and lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) before and at the hepatobiliary phase MRI (HBP-MRI) after gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) injection, using several T1-weighted images (T1-WI), for the characterization of benign hepatocellular lesions.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), who underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhanced HBP-MRI from 2009 to 2017, were retrospectively identified. The lesion-to-liver SIR was visually assessed by two radiologists on HBP (post-HBP analysis) and compared with that of unenhanced sequences (pre/post-HBP analysis) on T1-WI in-phase (T1-IP), out-of-phase (T1-OP), and fat suppression (T1-FS). Lesions were classified as hyper-, iso-, or hypointense on post-HBP, and as decreasing, stable, or increasing SIR on pre/post-HBP analyses. The performance of the different T1-WI sequences for the diagnostic of FNH was evaluated on post-HBP analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine FNHs and 33 HCAs were analyzed. On post-HBP analysis, FNHs appeared hyper-/isointense in 89.7% of all T1-WI. HCAs appeared hypointense in 93.9%, 63.6%, and 69.7% of T1-IP, T1-OP, and T1-FS, respectively. FNHs exhibited an increasing SIR in 55.2-58.6%, a stable SIR in 44.8-58.6%, and a decreasing SIR in 0%, whereas HCAs exhibited a decreasing SIR in 66.7-93.9%, a stable SIR in 6.1-33.3%, and an increasing SIR in 0% (p < 0.0001). The specificity of T1-IP was significantly higher than that of T1-OP (p = 0.015) and T1-FS (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

T1-IP is the most reliable sequence due to misleading tumor/liver signal ratio in the case of fatty liver when using T1-FS or T1-OP. The pre/post-HBP lesion-to-liver SIR is accurate to classify benign hepatocellular lesions and contributes to avoid biopsy.

KEY POINTS

•The T1-weighted images in-phase should be systematically included in the HBP-MRI protocol, as it is the most reliable sequence especially in the case of fatty liver. •The comparison between lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios on unenhanced and at the hepatobiliary phase sequences is useful to classify benign hepatocellular lesions in three categories without misclassification: FNH (increasing signal intensity ratio), HCA (decreasing signal intensity ration), and indeterminate lesions (stable signal intensity ratio).

New MRI features improve subtype classification of hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVE

MRI is crucial for the classification of hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) into subtypes. Our objective was to review and increase MRI criteria for subtype classification and define the limits.

METHODS

Pathological and radiological data of 116 HCAs were retrospectively analyzed to investigate MRI features of HCA pathological subtypes. Risk for complication was also evaluated with regard to subtype and tumor size.

RESULTS

38/43 (88%) HNF1α-mutated HCAs (H-HCAs) were discriminated by (i) fatty component (homogeneous or heterogeneous) and (ii) hypovascular pattern, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 97%. 51/58 (88%) inflammatory HCAs (IHCAs) displayed features of sinusoidal dilatation (SD) including three different patterns (global SD, atoll sign, and a new "crescent sign" corresponding to a partial peripheral rim, hyperintense on T2W and/or arterial phase with persistent delayed enhancement). Sensitivity was 88% and specificity 100%. However, some HCA remained unclassifiable by MRI: HCA remodeled by necrotic/hemorrhagic changes covering > 50% of the lesion, H-HCAs without steatosis, IHCAs without SD, β-catenin-mutated and unclassified HCAs. Regarding malignant transformation (5/116) and bleeding (24/116), none was observed when the HCA diameter was smaller than 5.2 cm and 4.2 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the largest series evaluated until now, we identified several non-described MRI features and propose new highly sensitive and specific MRI criteria. With the addition of these new features, 88% of the two main HCA subtypes could be identified.

KEY POINTS

• HNF1α-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (H-HCA) are characterized by the presence of fat and hypovascular pattern in MRI. • Inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas (I-HCA) are characterized by different patterns translating sinusoidal dilatation including the newly described crescent sign. • No MRI specific pattern was identified for β-catenin-mutated HCA (b-HCA).

Hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings with an emphasis on differentiation between primary and secondary tumors

PURPOSE

To describe the findings of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (hNET) and to identify the features that differentiate secondary from primary tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between August 2008 and December 2014, 50 patients with pathologically proven hNETs who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging with diffusion-weighted images were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had primary (n = 17) or secondary (n = 33) hNETs. Qualitative values based on a consensus between two observers [morphologic findings, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern (poor or indeterminate; hepatocellular carcinoma-like or cholangiocarcinoma-like)], and quantitative values (apparent diffusion coefficient) were evaluated as predictors of secondary hNETs using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the presence of multiple lesions (p = 0.011), a tumor size less than 6.3 cm (p = 0.001), and a hepatocellular carcinoma-like enhancement pattern (p = 0.031) were significant independent factors for differentiating secondary from primary hNETs, and achieved a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 82%, and an accuracy of 88%, with a value of the area under the ROC curve of 0.931.

CONCLUSION

Using these specific MR imaging criteria, secondary hNETs could be differentiated from primary hNETs with a high degree of accuracy in patients with histopathologically proven hNETs.

Differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: Is hepatobiliary phase MRI (HBP-MRI) using linear gadolinium chelates always useful?

PURPOSE

To assess the value of Hepatobiliary phase MRI (HPB-MRI) to differentiate FNH and HCA, and evaluate its impact on diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence, inter-observer variability, and patient clinical management.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients referred for Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included in this IRB-approved study, with a total of 119 lesions-90 FNH and 29 HCA. Two observers separately assessed in 2 distinct randomized reading sessions the performance of MRI with (HBP-MRI) or without (conventional MRI) the use of HBP images. Each lesion was ranked with a 5-point scale (from 1 Typical FNH to 5 Certainly not a FNH). Sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and inter-observer agreement for the differentiation of FNH from HCA were calculated and compared between conventional and HBP-MRI.

RESULTS

Both sensitivity (respective values of 38.9% and 97.8%), overall accuracy (respective values of 53.8% and 98.3%), and inter-observer agreement (respective values of Kappa 0.56 and 0.88) were significantly higher using HBP-MRI than with conventional MRI, with unchanged specificity (100%). The sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of FNH was significantly lower in lesions ≤ 3 cm (20% vs. 88%). Overall, HBP could have changed lesion management in 59/119 cases (49.5%), including 53 FNH and 6 HCA with no impact in 60/119 lesions (50.5%) including all 35 lesions classified as scores 1 and 2 for the diagnosis of FNH.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical impact of HBP-MRI is mostly important for smaller than 3-cm FNH, and more limited in larger FNH lesions as well as for HCA diagnosis for which conventional MRI is already accurate. The use of extracellular contrast agents upfront could limit the required use of linear HBP contrast agents for benign hepatocellular lesion characterization. On HBP, all FNH appeared hypointense compared to adjacent liver while close to 97% of HCA appeared hypointense.

Quantitative correlation between uptake of Gd-BOPTA on hepatobiliary phase and tumor molecular features in patients with benign hepatocellular lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to correlate the quantitative analysis of benign hepatocellular tumor uptake on delayed hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging with the quantitative level of OATP expression.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study, which took place between September 2009 and March 2015, included 20 consecutive patients with a proven pathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) diagnosis of FNH or HCA, including quantification of the OATP expression. The patients underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhancement MRI, including an HBP. The analysis of HBP uptake was performed using the liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER). Mean LLCER and OATP expressions were compared between FNH and HCA, and the expression of OATP was correlated with the LLCER value.

RESULTS

Of the 23 benign hepatocellular tumors, 9 (39%) were FNH and 14 (61%) were HCA, including 6 inflammatory, 2 HNF1a inactivated, 3 β-catenin-mutated and 3 unclassified HCAs. On HBP, 100% of the FNH appeared hyper- or isointense, and 79% of the adenomas appeared hypointense. The mean OATP expression of FNH (46.67 ± 26.58%) was significantly higher than that of HCA (22.14 ± 30.74%) (p = 0.0273), and the mean LLCER of FNH (10.66 ± 7.403%) was significantly higher than that of HCA (-13.5 ± 12.25%) (p < 0.0001). The mean LLCER of β-catenin-mutated HCA was significantly higher than that of other HCAs (p = 0.011). Significant correlation was found between the OATP expression and LLCER values (r = 0.661; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In benign hepatocellular tumors, the quantitative analysis of hepatobiliary contrast agent uptake on HBP is correlated with the level of OATP expression and could be used as an imaging biomarker of the molecular background of HCA and FNH.

KEY POINTS

• Gd-BOPTA uptake on HBP correlates with the OATP level in benign hepatocellular tumors • FNH and β-catenin-mutated HCA showed an increased lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) • Increased LLCER may be explained by activation of the Wnt β-catenin pathway.

MR imaging of hepatocellular adenomas on genotype-phenotype classification: A report from China

PURPOSE

To investigate and compare the MR features between hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes in China, including preliminary observations on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with 39 pathologically proven HCAs underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced MRI. The morphological and imaging features on T1, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced imaging and DWI were retrospectively evaluated and compared between four HCA subtypes, using Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher's exact test and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test.

RESULTS

HCA frequently occurred in male (n = 19, 52.8%), lacked an association with oral contraceptives (n = 0), and had a relatively high incidence of coexistent Hepatitis B infection (n = 6, 16.7%). Signals on T1 and T2-weighted imaging, enhancement pattern and intensity, lesion heterogeneity, as well as accompanying findings including lesion steatosis, necrosis or cystic component, central scar, and pseudocapsule were different between HCA subtypes (P < .0001 to P = .019). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among HCA subtypes were different as a whole (P = .029), within which β-catenin-mutated HCA had the lowest ADCs; but post hoc comparisons demonstrated no significant differences between groups (P = .066-1.000).

CONCLUSION

Both clinical and MR imaging presentation of HCA in China had some specific characteristics, and a good relationship existed between MR data and genotype-phenotype classification. Furthermore, ADC value may provide a potential indicator of malignant transformation.

Hepatic neuroendocrine tumour: Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker of prognosis associated with tumour grade and overall survival

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correlation between grade of hepatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) according to the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and to assess whether ADC value can predict overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of hepatic NETs.

METHODS

The study included 63 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with diffusion-weighted images for the evaluation of hepatic NETs. The correlation between qualitative and quantitative MR imaging findings, including ADC values, and WHO classifications was assessed. The association between ADC value and OS was analyzed.

RESULTS

The ADC values and WHO classification of hepatic NETs were moderately negatively correlated in a statistically significant manner (ρ = -0.57, p < 0.001). The OS rates were significantly different according to the ADC value (low ADC vs. high ADC, p = 0.006) as well as WHO classifications (G1+ G2 vs. G3, p = 0.038). However, multivariate analysis revealed that the only independent predictor for OS was a low ADC value (hazard ratio: 3.37, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant correlation between the ADC value of hepatic NETs and the WHO tumour grade. Additionally, the ADC value of a hepatic NET might be more accurate than the current WHO tumour grade for predicting OS.

KEY POINTS

• ADC values of hepatic NET and WHO tumour grade were negatively correlated. • Lower ADC values of hepatic NET were significantly correlated with worse OS. • ADC value might be more accurate than WHO grade for predicting OS.

Transient severe motion during arterial phase in patients with Gadoxetic acid administration: Can a five hepatic arterial subphases technique mitigate the artifact?

Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent, which has been increasingly used in recent years. However, it has been reported that Gd-EOB-DTPA related transient severe motion (TSM) is sometimes observed during the hepatic arterial phase of MR imaging, which may influence image quality. Since the hepatic arterial phase of contrast enhancement is used for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, it is crucial to obtain a decent arterial phase imaging. The present study analyzed motion in patients receiving Gd-EOB-DTPA, comparing a single arterial phase acquisition to a five arterial phase acquisition to determine whether the multiphase acquisition was able to alleviate the TSM-related hepatic arterial MR imaging artifact. It was demonstrated that the single-phase acquisition failed to provide adequate diagnostic image quality in patients with TSM, whereas the multiphase arterial acquisition provided acceptable image quality in 20/22 (90.9%) patients with TSM. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that multiphase arterial acquisition is superior to single-phase arterial acquisition, mitigating arterial MR imaging artifacts caused by TSM after the administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Unclassified hepatocellular adenoma in a middle-aged woman with glucose intolerance

The patient was a 43-year-old woman with obesity (body mass index: 29.1) and glucose intolerance who was not taking oral contraceptives. An ultrasound showed a hypoechoic hepatic mass. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a lesion in segment 6 that showed homogeneous and slight-to-moderate enhancement in the arterial phase with persistent enhancement during the portal and equilibrium phases. On magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the lesion demonstrated hyperintensity on T2- and diffusion-weighted images and hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MR imaging. In addition to the main lesion, approximately ten small hypointense lesions were seen in the hepatobiliary phase. The background liver was fatty without the deformity of chronic liver disease. Based on the pathological findings of the main lesion biopsy, it was initially suspected to be a non-neoplastic lesion with hematoxylin and eosin staining and initial immunohistochemical staining. However, the radiological findings indicated a neoplastic lesion. Additional immunohistochemical staining, including that for α-smooth muscle actin and organic anion transporter polypeptide 1B3, in combination with the radiological findings resulted in a diagnosis of unclassified hepatocellular adenoma. The other small lesions were presumed to be related to the main lesion.

Liver Masses: What Physicians Need to Know About Ordering and Interpreting Liver Imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews diagnostic imaging techniques used to characterize liver masses and the imaging characteristics of the most common liver masses.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of recently adopted ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents will be emphasized. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an inexpensive exam which can confirm benignity of certain liver masses without ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging using hepatocyte-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents can help confirm or narrow the differential diagnosis of liver masses.

Diagnostic Value of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MR Imaging to Distinguish HCA and Its Subtype from FNH: A Systematic Review

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) for differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), as well as HCA classification by using the low signal intensity (SI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Methods: A systematic process was used to review all published data in MEDLINE database about Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI applied to differentiation of HCA and FNH, and classification of HCA by using low SI in the HBP. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of low SI in the HBP. Results: A review of 45 articles identified 10 eligible studies with a total of 288 HCA lesions. The pooled proportion of low SI in the HBP of HCA were 91% (95% CI: 0.81-0.97). In specific, the subtypes of HCA were 75% (95% CI: 0.64-0.85) for I-HCA, 100% (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) for H-HCA, 92% (95% CI: 0.70-1.00) for U-HCA, and 59% (95% CI: 0.00-1.00) for b-HCA, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity of low SI in the HBP for distinguishing FNH from HCA were 95% (95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and 92% (95% CI: 0.87-0.96), respectively. Conclusion: Low SI in the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is associated with higher accuracy for distinguishing HCA from FNH. However, the diagnostic accuracy may be overvalued, especially for the diagnosis of subtypes of b-HCA and I-HCA. Therefore, the risk factors and conventional imaging findings should be take into account simultaneously.

Diagnostic Value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI for Hepatocellular Adenoma: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study aimed to systematically review the gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) findings of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), especially focusing on the diagnostic value of low signal intensity (SI) in the hepatocyte-phase (HBP) for differentiating HCA from focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted in PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases (CNKI) to identify studies evaluating Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI presentations of HCA. Published studies using pathological examinations as the gold standard were included. The pooled proportions of low SI in the HBP, arterial-phase, portal venous-phase (PVP) in HCA were calculated, as well as pooled proportions of bleeding, fatty degeneration, and central scar. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of low SI in the HBP for HCA.

Results: The search yielded 90 studies, with 8 assessing a total of 256 HCA cases included in this study, total of 229 lesions showed low signal in the HBP. Pooled proportions of low SI in the arterial-phase, PVP, and HBP were 2% (95% CI: 0.01-0.05), 39% (95% CI: 0.25-0.55), and 89% (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), respectively. Pooled proportions of bleeding, fatty degeneration, and central scar in HCA were 11% (95% CI: 0.03-0.19), 37% (95% CI: 0.27-0.49), and 10% (95% CI: 0.03-0.27), respectively. The meta-analysis revealed the following characteristics of low SI in the HBP for HCA diagnosis: 1) pooled sensitivity, 0.917 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96); 2) pooled specificity, 0.952 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98); 3) pooled positive likelihood ratio, 15.028 (95% CI: 7.10-31.82); 4) pooled negative likelihood ratio, 0.105 (95% CI: 0.07-0.17); 5) area under the ROC, 0.9802 (Q value of 0.9375), The sensitivity analysis showed that no single study was found to influence the overall pooled estimates significantly, which indicated the stability of the meta-analysis results were good.

Conclusions: Low SI on the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI was helpful for the diagnosis of HCA and differentiating from FNH, but it was overvalued, especially for some HCA pathological subtypes. Combining low SI in the HBP with routine MRI presentations and the risk factors of liver diseases could substantially improve its diagnosis value for HCA as well as differential diagnosis.

MRI of paediatric liver tumours: How we review and report

Liver tumours are fortunately rare in children. Benign tumours such as haemangiomas and cystic mesenchymal hamartomas are typically seen in infancy, often before 6 months of age. After that age, malignant hepatic tumours increase in frequency. The differentiation of a malignant from benign lesion on imaging can often negate the need for biopsy. Ultrasound is currently the main screening tool for suspected liver pathology, and is ideally suited for evaluation of hepatic lesions in children due to their generally small size. With increasing research, public awareness and parental anxiety regarding radiation dosage from CT imaging, MRI is now unquestionably the modality of choice for further characterisation of hepatic mass lesions.

Nevertheless the cost, length of imaging time and perceived complexity of a paediatric liver MR study can be intimidating to the general radiologist and referring clinician. This article outlines standard MR sequences utilised, reasons for their utilisation, types of mixed hepatocyte specific/extracellular contrast agents employed and imaging features that aid the interpretation of paediatric liver lesions. The two commonest paediatric liver malignancies, namely hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma are described. Differentiation of primary hepatic malignancies with metastatic disease and mimickers of malignancy such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenomas are also featured in this review..

Imaging should aim to clarify the presence of a lesion, the likelihood of malignancy and potential for complete surgical resection. Reviewing and reporting the studies should address these issues in a systematic fashion whilst also commenting upon background liver parenchymal appearances. Clinical information and adequate patient preparation prior to MR imaging studies help enhance the diagnostic yield.

Imaging of Hepatic Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Pictorial Review and Diagnostic Strategy

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign solid liver lesion after hemangioma, occurring more frequently in young women. The prime differential diagnoses include hepatocellular adenoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hypervascular metastasis. As the management of FNH is typically conservative, imaging plays a key role in diagnostic pathway, and misdiagnosis may have a major clinical effect. In this article, we describe the ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features of FNH, underlining the importance of typical radiological features that allow a specific noninvasive diagnosis. We present a large spectrum of a typical imaging findings that FNH may present and discuss the up-to-date diagnostic strategy.