1
|
Wong LM, Sutherland T, Perry E, Tran V, Spelman T, Corcoran N, Lawrentschuk N, Woo H, Lenaghan D, Buchan N, Bax K, Symons J, Saeed Goolam A, Chalasani V, Hegarty J, Thomas L, Christov A, Ng M, Khanani H, Lee SF, Taubman K, Tarlinton L. Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL). Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00026-9. [PMID: 38281891 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is used for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, mpMRI has lower sensitivity for small tumours. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) offers increased sensitivity over conventional imaging. This study aims to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA-PET/CT was superior to that of mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) at biopsy. METHODS Between 2020 and 2021, a prospective multicentre single-arm phase 3 imaging trial enrolled patients with clinical suspicion for PCa to have both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT (thorax to thigh), with reviewers blinded to the results of other imaging. Multiparametric MRI was considered positive for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3-5. PSMA-PET/CT was assessed quantitatively (positive maximum standardised uptake value [SUVmax] >7) and qualitatively (five-point lexicon of certainty). Patients underwent targeted and systematic biopsy, with the technique at the discretion of the treating urologist. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) ≥2. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy for detecting PCa, reported as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve. The secondary endpoints included a comparison of the diagnostic accuracy for detecting csPCa, assessing gains in combining PMSA-PET/CT with mpMRI to mpMRI alone. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 236 patients completing both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT, 184 (76.7%) had biopsy. Biopsy histology was benign (n = 73), GG 1 (n = 27), and GG ≥2 (n = 84). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for detecting PCa (AUC 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69, 0.82) was higher than that of PSMA-PET/CT (AUC 0.63; 95% CI 0.56, 0.70, p = 0.03). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for detecting csPCa (AUC 0.72; 95% CI 0.67, 0.78) was higher than that of PSMA-PET/CT (AUC 0.62; 95% CI 0.55, 0.69) but not statistically significant (p = 0.27). A combination of PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI showed excellent sensitivity (98.8%, 95% CI 93.5%, 100%) and NPV (96%, 95% CI 79.6%, 99.9%) over mpMRI alone (86.9% and 80.7%, respectively, p = 0.01). Thirty-two patients (13.6%) had metastatic disease. They tended to be older (68.4 vs 65.1 yr, p = 0.023), and have higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA; median PSA 9.6 vs 6.2ng/ml, p < 0.001) and abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination (78.2% vs 44.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Multiparametric MRI had superior diagnostic accuracy to PSMA-PET/CT for detecting PCa, though the difference is not significant in case of csPCa detection. A combination of mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT showed improved sensitivity and NPV. PSMA-PET/CT could be considered for diagnostic use in patients unable to have mpMRI or those with concerning clinical features but negative mpMRI. PATIENT SUMMARY In this trial, we compared the ability of 18F-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) with that of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to diagnose prostate cancer by biopsy in a prostate-specific antigen screening population. We found that MRI was superior to PSMA to diagnose prostate cancer, though there was no difference in ability to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. PSMA-PET/CT could be considered for diagnostic use in patients unable to have mpMRI or those with concerning clinical features but negative mpMRI. Combining MRI with PSMA-PET increases the negative predictive value over MRI alone and may help men avoid invasive prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lih-Ming Wong
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elisa Perry
- Pacific Radiology, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Vy Tran
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tim Spelman
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Niall Corcoran
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Henry Woo
- Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Adventist Northshore Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Lenaghan
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Buchan
- Christchurch Public Hospital, Urology Associates, Christchurch, New Zealand; Canterbury Urology Research Trust Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Kevin Bax
- Christchurch Public Hospital, Urology Associates, Christchurch, New Zealand; Canterbury Urology Research Trust Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - James Symons
- Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ahmed Saeed Goolam
- Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Venu Chalasani
- Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Hegarty
- Pacific Radiology, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Lauren Thomas
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexandar Christov
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Ng
- GenesisCare, St Vincent's, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hadia Khanani
- Sydney Adventist Northshore Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Su-Faye Lee
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Tarlinton
- Sydney Adventist Northshore Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lawal IO, Ndlovu H, Kgatle M, Mokoala KMG, Sathekge MM. Prognostic Value of PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:46-59. [PMID: 37482489 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in the majority of prostate cancer (PCa). PSMA has an enzymatic function that makes metabolic substrates such as folate available for utilization by PCa cells. Intracellular folate availability drives aggressive tumor phenotype. PSMA expression is, therefore, a marker of aggressive tumor biology. The large extracellular domain of PSMA is available for targeting by diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides, making it a suitable cellular epitope for theranostics. PET imaging of radiolabeled PSMA ligands has several prognostic utilities. In the prebiopsy setting, intense PSMA avidity in a prostate lesion correlate well with clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on histology. When used for staging, PSMA PET imaging outperforms conventional imaging for the accurate staging of primary PCa, and findings on imaging predict post-treatment outcomes. The biggest contribution of PSMA PET imaging to PCa management is in the biochemical recurrence setting, where it has emerged as the most sensitive imaging modality for the localization of PCa recurrence by helping to guide salvage therapy. PSMA PET obtained for localizing the site of recurrence is prognostic, such that a higher lesion number predicts a less favorable outcome to salvage radiotherapy or surgical intervention. Systemic therapy is given to patients with advanced PCa with distant metastasis. PSMA PET is useful for predicting response to treatments with chemotherapy, first- and second-line androgen deprivation therapies, and PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. Artificial intelligence using machine learning algorithms allows for the mining of information from clinical images not visible to the human eyes. Artificial intelligence applied to PSMA PET images, therefore, holds great promise for prognostication in PCa management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismaheel O Lawal
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Honest Ndlovu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Mankgopo Kgatle
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso M G Mokoala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Mike M Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma J, Yang Q, Ye X, Xu W, Chang Y, Chen R, Wang Y, Luo M, Lou Y, Yang X, Li D, Xu Y, He W, Cai M, Cao W, Ju G, Yin L, Wang J, Ren J, Ma Z, Zuo C, Ren S. Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00330-023-10436-2. [PMID: 37981590 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10436-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages. RESULTS We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18). CONCLUSION PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging. KEY POINTS • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianglei Ma
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Qinqin Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Xiaofei Ye
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Weidong Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yifan Chang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Ye Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Mengting Luo
- College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Yihaoyun Lou
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xuming Yang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Central Hospital, Hengyang, 421001, Hu'nan, China
| | - Duocai Li
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yusi Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Wei He
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Minglei Cai
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Wanli Cao
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Guanqun Ju
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Lei Yin
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Junkai Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Jizhong Ren
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Zifang Ma
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Central Hospital, Hengyang, 421001, Hu'nan, China.
| | - Changjing Zuo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Shancheng Ren
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mapelli P, Ghezzo S, Spataro A, Bezzi C, Samanes Gajate AM, Chiti A, Picchio M. Systematic Review and Metanalysis on the Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Intraprostatic Tumour Assessment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2023; 31:605-611. [PMID: 37741644 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
The present systematic review and meta-analysis are focused on the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer assessment. A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database using the terms "PSMA" AND "prostate cancer" or "prostate" AND "PET/MRI" or "PET MRI" or "PET-MRI" or "PET-MR" AND "primary" or "staging." Ten articles were eligible for analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. PET/MRI showed better diagnostic accuracy in detecting primary PCa compared to multiparametric (mp) MRI and PET alone. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI at the per-patient level were 0.976 (CI: 0.943-0.991) and 0.739 (CI: 0.437-0.912); respectively. PSMA PET/MRI has good sensitivity in detecting primary PCa, especially in patients with PIRADS 3 PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Samuele Ghezzo
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Alessandro Spataro
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, Messina 98122, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan 20132, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heetman JG, Hermsen R, Exterkate L, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Brouwer LJM, Somford DM, van den Bergh RCN, van Basten JPA. Immunohistochemical and histopathological validation of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for intraprostatic cancerous lesions. Prostate 2023; 83:1332-1341. [PMID: 37455399 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aim to immunohistochemically and histopathological validate the fluorine-18 (18 F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intraprostatic PCa lesions. METHODS Between February 2019 and October 2020, patients with biopsy-proven, treatment-naïve intermediate-to-high-risk PCa undergoing an 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were prospectively enrolled. For all PCa lesions found on whole-mount histopathology, location, size, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG), and immune reactive score (IRS) were assessed after PSMA staining. ISUP GG ≥ 3 PCa was defined as clinically significant (cs) PCa. All lesions were matched on PSMA PET/CT and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. RESULTS A total of 125 lesions were analyzed in the 80 RARP specimens, of which 49 (40%) were csPCa and 76 (60%) non-csPCa. Linear multivariable regressions showed that an increase in SUVmax significantly correlated with a higher ISUP GG (p values between 0.021 and 0.001) and a higher IRS (p = 0.017). Logistic multivariable regression showed that csPCa significantly correlated with a higher SUVmax (odds ratio, OR: 1.17 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.04-1.21, p = 0.005]), an increase in tumor length (OR: 1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.020]) and a higher IRS (OR; 1.24 [95% CI 1.07-1.47, p = 0.006]). A SUVmax threshold of 4 would have resulted in one (2%) missed lesion with csPCa. CONCLUSION This prospective study revealed that 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT SUVmax is correlated with the ISUP GG and IRS, and thereby could be a tool to characterize intraprostatic PCa lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris G Heetman
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Utrecht-Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Exterkate
- Department of Urology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lenneke J M Brouwer
- Department of Urology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Basso Dias A, Ghai S, Ortega C, Mirshahvalad SA, Perlis N, Berlin A, Avery L, Veit-Haibach P, van der Kwast T, Metser U. Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI in Selecting Men With Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer for Focal Ablative Therapies. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e462-e467. [PMID: 37682613 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performance of multiparametric (mp) MRI to 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI for detecting clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) in men with low-/intermediate-risk PCa being considered for focal ablative therapy (FT), using 2 interpretation schemes, and to assess the rate of exclusion from FT for each modality. METHODS This prospective study evaluated men with low- or intermediate-risk PCa, potential candidates for FT based on initial biopsy as per institutional protocol, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI. Each modality (mpMRI, PET/MRI using PROMISE classification [PET/MRI PROMISE], and PET/MRI considering any focal lesion on PET as positive [PETFL/MRI]) was assessed independently. All suspicious lesions underwent PET/MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies. Diagnostic performances were calculated and compared using the exact binomial test on paired proportions. RESULTS Thirty-four men (median age, 64 years; interquartile range, 60-70 years) were included. Overall, 40 of 67 lesions (60%) identified on mpMRI and/or PET/MRI were malignant, and 34 of 40 lesions (85%) were csPCa (≥6 mm ISUP [International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group] GG1 or ISUP-GG ≥2). On lesion-level analysis, for detecting csPCa, sensitivity appeared higher for PETFL/MRI than mpMRI and PET/MRI PROMISE (97% vs 76% and 79%, respectively [P = 0.02 and 0.03]), whereas specificity was lower (30% vs 85% and 88%, respectively [P < 0.001]). The calculated overall accuracy rates for PETFL/MRI, mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE were 64%, 81%, and 84%, respectively. PETFL/MRI, mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE excluded 10 of 34 (29%), 7 of 34 (21%), and 6 of 34 (18%) men from FT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI excluded nearly 30% of patients with low-/intermediate-risk PCa from FT, with a potential role in decreasing selection failure. Compared with mpMRI, PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity for detecting csPCa in men who were candidates for FT.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03149861.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Avery
- Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoffman A, Amiel GE. The Impact of PSMA PET/CT on Modern Prostate Cancer Management and Decision Making-The Urological Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3402. [PMID: 37444512 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET use in prostate cancer treatment has recently become a routinely used imaging modality by urologists. New, established data regarding its performance in different stages of prostate cancer, as well as gaining clinical knowledge with new tracers, drives the need for urologists and other clinicians to improve the utilization of this tool. While the use of PSMA PET/CT is more common in metastatic disease, in which it outperforms classical imaging modalities and drives treatment decisions and adjustments, recently, it gained ground in localized prostate cancer as well, especially in high-risk disease. Still, PSMA PET/CT might reveal lesions within the prostate or possibly locoregional or metastatic disease, not always representing true cancer when utilized in earlier stages of the disease, potentially adding diagnostic burden and changing treatment decisions. As urological treatment options advance toward focal treatments in localized organ-confined prostate cancer, recent reports suggest the utilization of PSMA PET/CT in treatment planning and follow-up and even when choosing active surveillance. This review aims to reveal the current perspective of urologists regarding its daily use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azik Hoffman
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| | - Gilad E Amiel
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:91-105. [PMID: 37101769 PMCID: PMC10123424 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported. Objective In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup. Evidence acquisition Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review. Evidence synthesis Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used. Conclusions This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa. Patient summary Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gravestock P, Somani BK, Tokas T, Rai BP. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031186. [PMID: 36769834 PMCID: PMC9918161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wong LM, Koschel S, Whish-Wilson T, Farag M, Bolton D, Zargar H, Corcoran N, Lawrentschuk N, Christov A, Thomas L, Perry E, Heinze S, Taubman K, Sutherland T. Investigating PSMA-PET/CT to resolve prostate MRI PIRADS4-5 and negative biopsy discordance. World J Urol 2023; 41:463-469. [PMID: 36602577 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04243-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the utility of diagnostic 18F-DCPyL PSMA-PET/CT to aid management of men with highly suspicious multiparametric MRI prostate (PIRAD 4-5 lesions) and discrepant negative prostate biopsy. METHODS A multicentre prospective consecutive case series was conducted (2018-2021), recruiting men with prior mpMRI prostate PIRADS 4-5 lesions and negative prostate biopsy. All men had 18F-DCPyL PSMA-PET/CT with subsequent management based on the concordance between MRI and PET: (1) Concordant lesions were biopsied using in-bore MRI targeting; (2) PSMA-PET/CT avidity without MRI correlate were biopsied using cognitive/software targeting with ultrasound guidance and (3) Patients with negative PET/CT were returned to standard of care follow-up. RESULTS 29 patients were recruited with 48% (n = 14) having concordant MRI/PET abnormalities. MRI targeted biopsy found prostate cancer in six patients, with grade groups GG3 (n = 1), GG2 (n = 1), GG1 (n = 4) found. Of the 20 men who PSMA-PET/CT avidity and biopsy, analysis showed higher SUVmax (20.1 vs 6.8, p = 0.036) predicted prostate cancer. Of patients who had PSMA-PET avidity without MRI correlate, and those with no PSMA-PET avidity, only one patient was subsequently found to have prostate cancer (GG1). The study is limited by small size and short follow-up of 17 months (IQR 12.5-29.9). CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET/CT is useful in this group of men but requires further investigation. Avidity (higher SUVmax) that correlates to the mpMRI prostate lesion should be considered for targeted biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lih-Ming Wong
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Samantha Koschel
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thomas Whish-Wilson
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew Farag
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Homi Zargar
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Niall Corcoran
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Urology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexandar Christov
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lauren Thomas
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elisa Perry
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stefan Heinze
- Department of Radiology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Health Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ghezzo S, Mongardi S, Bezzi C, Samanes Gajate AM, Preza E, Gotuzzo I, Baldassi F, Jonghi-Lavarini L, Neri I, Russo T, Brembilla G, De Cobelli F, Scifo P, Mapelli P, Picchio M. External validation of a convolutional neural network for the automatic segmentation of intraprostatic tumor lesions on 68Ga-PSMA PET images. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1133269. [PMID: 36910493 PMCID: PMC9995820 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1133269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction State of the art artificial intelligence (AI) models have the potential to become a "one-stop shop" to improve diagnosis and prognosis in several oncological settings. The external validation of AI models on independent cohorts is essential to evaluate their generalization ability, hence their potential utility in clinical practice. In this study we tested on a large, separate cohort a recently proposed state-of-the-art convolutional neural network for the automatic segmentation of intraprostatic cancer lesions on PSMA PET images. Methods Eighty-five biopsy proven prostate cancer patients who underwent 68Ga PSMA PET for staging purposes were enrolled in this study. Images were acquired with either fully hybrid PET/MRI (N = 46) or PET/CT (N = 39); all participants showed at least one intraprostatic pathological finding on PET images that was independently segmented by two Nuclear Medicine physicians. The trained model was available at https://gitlab.com/dejankostyszyn/prostate-gtv-segmentation and data processing has been done in agreement with the reference work. Results When compared to the manual contouring, the AI model yielded a median dice score = 0.74, therefore showing a moderately good performance. Results were robust to the modality used to acquire images (PET/CT or PET/MRI) and to the ground truth labels (no significant difference between the model's performance when compared to reader 1 or reader 2 manual contouring). Discussion In conclusion, this AI model could be used to automatically segment intraprostatic cancer lesions for research purposes, as instance to define the volume of interest for radiomics or deep learning analysis. However, more robust performance is needed for the generation of AI-based decision support technologies to be proposed in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Ghezzo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sofia Mongardi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Erik Preza
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Gotuzzo
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Baldassi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Neri
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Russo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Scifo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tran V, Hong A, Sutherland T, Taubman K, Lee SF, Lenaghan D, Sethi K, Corcoran NM, Lawrentschuk N, Woo H, Tarlinton L, Bolton D, Spelman T, Thomas L, Booth R, Hegarty J, Perry E, Wong LM. PEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061815. [PMID: 36123093 PMCID: PMC9486365 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has emerged as valuable imaging to assessing metastatic disease in prostate malignancy. However, there has been limited studies exploring the utility PSMA-PET as primary imaging assessing for index lesions prior to biopsy. The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18-fluorine PSMA (18F DCFPyL PSMA) PET scans to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to detect primary prostate cancer at prostate biopsy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The PEDAL trial is a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, paired comparison, non-randomised phase III trial in subjects considered for diagnostic prostate biopsy. Subjects who are eligible for a diagnostic mpMRI prostate will undergo additional same-day 18 F DCFPyl PSMA PET/CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Software coregistration of the mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT images will be performed. The reporting of the mpMRI prostate, PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI coregistration will be performed blinded. The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT alone, and in combination with mpMRI, to detect prostate cancer will be assessed. Histopathology at prostate biopsy will be used as the reference standard. Sample size calculations estimate that 240 subjects will need to be recruited to demonstrate 20% superiority of PSMA-PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the combination of mpMRI prostate and PSMA PET/CT compared with targeted and systematic prostate biopsy will be evaluated. It is hypothesised that PSMA PET/CT combined with mpMRI prostate will have improved diagnostic accuracy compared with mpMRI prostate alone for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men, resulting in a significant impact on patient management. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the independent Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals with eligible investigators will significantly contribute. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12620000261910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vy Tran
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne Hong
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Su-Faye Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Lenaghan
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kapil Sethi
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Niall M Corcoran
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - H Woo
- Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Tarlinton
- San Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Spelman
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Russell Booth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justin Hegarty
- Pacific Radiology Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Elisa Perry
- Pacific Radiology Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Lih-Ming Wong
- Department of Urology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot. Cancer Lett 2022; 548:215883. [PMID: 36027998 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Shea A, Harisinghani M. PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:523-532. [PMID: 35596009 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01019-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate gland has become the initial evaluation of biopsy naïve men with a clinical suspicion for prostate cancer. PI-RADS 2.1 is a joint initiative and framework for prostate MRI acquisition and reporting, which aims to standardize technique and interpretation across centers. Building upon experience accrued following the introduction of PI-RADS 2.0, version 2.1 provides key updates and important clarifications, although it is intended to be an active document, which continues to be updated. Continued advances in our understanding of prostate cancer and progress in imaging technology will undoubtedly shape future iterations of the reporting system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen O'Shea
- Department of Radiology, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Ceci F, Baltzer PAT, Hacker M, Rasul S, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:390-400. [PMID: 35715320 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has gained acceptance as a staging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent reports suggest an association between PSMA PET and detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-targeted biopsy (PSMA-PET-TB) for csPCa detection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in December 2021 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of PSMA-PET-TB for csPCa detection. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA-PET-TB alone and in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TB for detecting csPCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, five prospective studies involving 497 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. For csPCa detection, PSMA-PET-TB had pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.93), 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.80), 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.50-0.93), respectively. Among the three studies assessing the PSMA-PET + MRI-TB strategy, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for csPCa detection were 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.64 (95% CI 0.40-0.82), 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-0.87), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), respectively. For lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.69, 0.73, 0.48, and 0.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET-TB appears to have favorable diagnostic accuracy for csPCa detection and combination with MRI seems to improve this. According to our meta-analysis, PSMA-PET has promising clinical application for detection of csPCa, namely in the case of PI-RADS 3 lesions. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the true clinical utility of a PSMA-PET-based diagnostic pathway. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is a promising imaging method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and seems to have additional value to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Zhang J, Xu B. Prospective intraindividual comparison of 18F-PSMA-7Q and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:725-730. [PMID: 35560134 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fluorine 18 (18F)-2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (DCFPyL) is an early 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted PET tracer that has shown promise in the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. 18F-PSMA-7Q is a novel 18F-labeled PSMA-ligand PET tracer designed and synthesized by our team. This study compared the tracer-specific positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) characteristics of 18F-PSMA-7Q with those of 18F-DCFPyL in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS Ten patients received similar doses of 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q 48 h apart and were imaged 1 h after injection on the same PET/CT scanner. Normal-organ biodistribution and tumor uptake were quantified using maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), and all lesions were assigned a molecular imaging PSMA (miPSMA) score based on Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation criteria. RESULTS Seventeen lesions were detected in the 10 patients by both 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q. No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing the SUVmax and SUVmean of 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-PSMA-7Q in the lesions and parotid gland. The κ value for the miPSMA scores of the lesions between the two tracers was 0.907, indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-7Q can be used in clinical research as reliably as 18F-DCFPyL. The limited urinary excretion of 18F-PSMA-7Q may represent a potential advantage over 18F-DCFPyL for detection of lesions in the pelvis, which need to be verified by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yachao Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
ABDOMEN-BECKEN – Mit der 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRT klinisch signifikante Prostatakarzinome ausschließen. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1754-6073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
18
|
Allach Y, Banda A, van Gemert W, de Groot M, Derks Y, Schilham M, Hoepping A, Perk L, Gotthardt M, Janssen M, Nagarajah J, Privé BM. An Explorative Study of the Incidental High Renal Excretion of [ 18F]PSMA-1007 for Prostate Cancer PET/CT Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092076. [PMID: 35565204 PMCID: PMC9100267 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) allows for accurate diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Compared to other PSMA PET tracers available, [18F]PSMA-1007 is predominantly excreted via the hepatobiliary tract resulting in low renal excretion which improves evaluation of the pelvic area. However, some patients do show high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007. The present study aimed to investigate this sudden high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007 by evaluating [18F]PSMA-1007 PET scans from PCa patients. In this single-center retrospective study, patients that underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET imaging between July 2018 and January 2021 were included. Data regarding the individual patient characteristics, scan acquisition and batch production were analyzed. To determine the urinary excretion of [18F]PSMA-1007, a region of interest was drawn in the bladder, and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated and compared to SUVs in the prostate. An SUVmax of >10 was considered high urinary excretion, an SUVmax 7.5−10 intermediate and an SUVmax < 7.5 low urinary excretion. A total of 344 patients underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging, with 37 patients receiving three or more [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans. The mean SUVmean and SUVmax of the bladder were 3.9 (SD 2.9) and 5.9 (SD 4.2), respectively. Fourteen percent of patients showed high urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007. Twelve of the thirty-seven patients (32.4%) that had multiple scans showed a varying urinary uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007 per PSMA PET/CT scan. In terms of patient characteristics, risk factors, medication and blood laboratory results, no significant influencing variables were found. Nor was there a difference observed in the batch size and the mean radiochemical purity of PSMA-1007 for high- and low-excreting patients. However, the bladder volume affected the mean SUVmax in the bladder significantly, with higher SUVs in lower bladder volumes. In this study, we observed that a higher SUV in the urinary tract seemed to occur in patients with low bladder volume. A prospective study is needed to corroborate this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssra Allach
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amina Banda
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Willemijn van Gemert
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Michel de Groot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Yvonne Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Melline Schilham
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Alexander Hoepping
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, ABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds GmbH, 1454 Radeberg, Germany;
| | - Lars Perk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Marcel Janssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - James Nagarajah
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
| | - Bastiaan M. Privé
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (Y.A.); (A.B.); (W.v.G.); (M.d.G.); (Y.D.); (M.S.); (L.P.); (M.G.); (M.J.); (J.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-24-3690031
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Feliciani G, Celli M, Ferroni F, Menghi E, Azzali I, Caroli P, Matteucci F, Barone D, Paganelli G, Sarnelli A. Radiomics Analysis on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI-ADC for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer ISUP Grades: Preliminary Results of the BIOPSTAGE Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081888. [PMID: 35454793 PMCID: PMC9028386 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics analysis is used on magnetic resonance imaging – apparent diffusion coefficient (MRI-ADC) maps and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake maps to assess unique tumor traits not visible to the naked eye and predict histology-proven ISUP grades in a cohort of 28 patients. Our study’s main goal is to report imaging features that can distinguish patients with low ISUP grades from those with higher grades (ISUP one+) by employing logistic regression statistical models based on MRI-ADC and 68Ga-PSMA data, as well as assess the features’ stability under small contouring variations. Our findings reveal that MRI-ADC and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging features-based models are equivalent and complementary for predicting low ISUP grade patients. These models can be employed in broader studies to confirm their ISUP grade prediction ability and eventually impact clinical workflow by reducing overdiagnosis of indolent, early-stage PCa. Abstract Prostate cancer (PCa) risk categorization based on clinical/PSA testing results in a substantial number of men being overdiagnosed with indolent, early-stage PCa. Clinically non-significant PCa is characterized as the presence of ISUP grade one, where PCa is found in no more than two prostate biopsy cores.MRI-ADC and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET have been proposed as tools to predict ISUP grade one patients and consequently reduce overdiagnosis. In this study, Radiomics analysis is applied to MRI-ADC and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET maps to quantify tumor characteristics and predict histology-proven ISUP grades. ICC was applied with a threshold of 0.6 to assess the features’ stability with variations in contouring. Logistic regression predictive models based on imaging features were trained on 31 lesions to differentiate ISUP grade one patients from ISUP two+ patients. The best model based on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET returned a prediction efficiency of 95% in the training phase and 100% in the test phase whereas the best model based on MRI-ADC had an efficiency of 100% in both phases. Employing both imaging modalities, prediction efficiency was 100% in the training phase and 93% in the test phase. Although our patient cohort was small, it was possible to assess that both imaging modalities add information to the prediction models and show promising results for further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Feliciani
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.M.); (A.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-327-4730398
| | - Monica Celli
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (G.P.)
| | - Fabio Ferroni
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.F.); (D.B.)
| | - Enrico Menghi
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.M.); (A.S.)
| | - Irene Azzali
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Paola Caroli
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (G.P.)
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (G.P.)
| | - Domenico Barone
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.F.); (D.B.)
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (M.C.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (G.P.)
| | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.M.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Froelich MF, Capoluongo E, Kovacs Z, Patton SJ, Lianidou ES, Haselmann V. The value proposition of integrative diagnostics for (early) detection of cancer. On behalf of the EFLM interdisciplinary Task and Finish Group "CNAPS/CTC for early detection of cancer". Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:821-829. [PMID: 35218176 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Disruptive imaging and laboratory technologies can improve clinical decision processes and outcomes in oncology. However, certain obstacles must be overcome before these technologies can be fully implemented as part of the standard for care. An integrative diagnostic approach represents a unique opportunity to unleash the full diagnostic potential and paves the way towards personalized cancer diagnostics. To meet this demand, an interdisciplinary Task Force of the EFLM was initiated as a consequence of an EFLM/ESR during the CELME 2019 meeting in order to evaluate the clinical value of CNAPS/CTC (circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum/circulating tumor cells) in early detection of cancer. Here, an overview of current disruptive techniques, their clinical implications and potential value of an integrative diagnostic approach is provided. Furthermore, requirements such as the establishment of diagnostic tumor boards, development of adequate software solutions and a change of mindset towards a new generation of diagnosticians providing actionable health information are presented. This development has the potential to elevate the position and clinical recognition of diagnosticians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ettore Capoluongo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy
| | - Zsolt Kovacs
- Department of Pathology, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Targu-Mures, Romania
| | | | - Evi S Lianidou
- Department of Chemistry, Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Lab, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Verena Haselmann
- Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schnitzer ML, Kremer C, Hertel A, Haselmann V, von Münchhausen N, Schoenberg SO, Froelich MF. Economic assessment of molecular imaging in the oncology treatment process. Eur J Radiol 2021; 146:110105. [PMID: 34920293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The development towards targeted treatments in oncology has been accompanied by significant improvements in molecular imaging. Yet, broad application of novel imaging techniques has partly been slowed down due to economical considerations. Building on the broad positive evidence of its diagnostic accuracy, modelling of effects on long-term costs and effectiveness may help to foster a broader application and acceptance of comprehensive molecular imaging techniques, such as PET/MRI. In this article, common economic evaluation techniques and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) evaluation methods will be introduced including Markov models and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). This is complemented with a review of literature on recently published cost-effectiveness of molecular imaging. Additionally, the strategic relevance of CEAs for the molecular imaging community is discussed and combined with a global outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz L Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christophe Kremer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alexander Hertel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Verena Haselmann
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Niklas von Münchhausen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan O Schoenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Williams HT, Estes TL. Anatomic and Functional Prostate Cancer Imaging. Radiology 2021; 301:387-388. [PMID: 34463558 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hadyn T Williams
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Sections of Nuclear Medicine (H.T.W.) and Abdominal Imaging (T.L.E.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912
| | - T Lane Estes
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Sections of Nuclear Medicine (H.T.W.) and Abdominal Imaging (T.L.E.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912
| |
Collapse
|