Atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis: clinical outcomes of stent placement for hypertension and renal failure

Impact of Renal Function Trajectory on Renal Replacement Therapy and Mortality Risk after Renal Artery Revascularization

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of renal function trajectory, defined as the change in renal function over time before and after renal artery stent placement, on long-term risk for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) 6-12 months before renal artery stent placement, at the time of intervention, and 6-12 months after intervention were determined in 398 patients. The effect of eGFR change before and after renal artery stent placement was calculated. Cox proportional-hazards ratio was used to determine the risks for RRT and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The risk for RRT was significantly influenced by eGFR change from the time of intervention to follow-up at 6-12 month after treatment (P = .02). In addition, among patients with a postintervention eGFR ≤ 40 mL/min/1.73 m², for every 1 unit of eGFR increase, there was a significant decrease in RRT and all-cause mortality (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Secondary parameters that increased RRT risk included diabetes at the time of intervention (P = .03), increased baseline proteinuria (P < .001), and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD; P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated higher all-cause mortality rates among patients with diabetes at the time of intervention (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Postintervention eGFR trajectory improvement approaching 40 mL/min/1.73 m² was associated with decreased RRT and mortality risk. These findings suggest that patients with advanced CKD and renal artery stenosis may benefit from revascularization regardless of their preinterventional renal function measurement.

Issues related to renal artery angioplasty and stenting

Renal artery stenosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of secondary hypertension, renal dysfunction, and flash pulmonary edema. Currently correction of renal arterial inflow stenosis is reserved for resistant hypertension patients who have failed maximal medical therapy, have worsening renal function and/or unexplained proximal congestive failure. With the recent advances in minimally invasive percutaneous stent placement techniques, open surgical revascularization has been largely replaced by renal artery stenting. The potential benefit of revascularization seemed intuitive; however, the initial enthusiasm and rise in the number of percutaneous interventions have been tempered by many subsequent negative randomized clinical trials that failed to prove the proposed benefits of the percutaneous intervention. The negative randomized trial results have fallen under scrutiny due to trial design concerns and inconsistent outcomes of these studies compared to pivotal trials undertaken under US Food and Drug Administration scrutiny. Treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery occlusive disease has become one of the most debatable topics in the field of vascular disease. The results from recent randomized clinical trials of renal artery stenting have basically limited the utilization of the procedure in many centers, but not every clinical scenario was covered in those trials. There are potential areas for improvement focusing mainly on procedural details and patient selection with respect to catheter based treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. We believe, limiting patient selection, enrollment criteria and outcomes measured functioned to reduce the benefit of renal artery stenosis stenting by not enrolling patients likely to benefit. Future studies incorporating potential procedural improvements and that include patients more likely to benefit from renal stenting than were included in ASTRAL and CORAL are needed to more carefully examine specific patient subgroups so that “the baby is not thrown out with the bath water.” We also discuss several other concerns related to renal artery stenting which include diagnostic, procedure, indication, and reimbursement issues.

Issues related to renal artery angioplasty and stenting

Renal artery stenosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of secondary hypertension, renal dysfunction, and flash pulmonary edema. Currently correction of renal arterial inflow stenosis is reserved for resistant hypertension patients who have failed maximal medical therapy, have worsening renal function and/or unexplained proximal congestive failure. With the recent advances in minimally invasive percutaneous stent placement techniques, open surgical revascularization has been largely replaced by renal artery stenting. The potential benefit of revascularization seemed intuitive; however, the initial enthusiasm and rise in the number of percutaneous interventions have been tempered by many subsequent negative randomized clinical trials that failed to prove the proposed benefits of the percutaneous intervention. The negative randomized trial results have fallen under scrutiny due to trial design concerns and inconsistent outcomes of these studies compared to pivotal trials undertaken under US Food and Drug Administration scrutiny. Treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery occlusive disease has become one of the most debatable topics in the field of vascular disease. The results from recent randomized clinical trials of renal artery stenting have basically limited the utilization of the procedure in many centers, but not every clinical scenario was covered in those trials. There are potential areas for improvement focusing mainly on procedural details and patient selection with respect to catheter based treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. We believe, limiting patient selection, enrollment criteria and outcomes measured functioned to reduce the benefit of renal artery stenosis stenting by not enrolling patients likely to benefit. Future studies incorporating potential procedural improvements and that include patients more likely to benefit from renal stenting than were included in ASTRAL and CORAL are needed to more carefully examine specific patient subgroups so that "the baby is not thrown out with the bath water." We also discuss several other concerns related to renal artery stenting which include diagnostic, procedure, indication, and reimbursement issues.

Technical discussion of diagnostic angiography and intervention of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenting remains an important adjuvant treatment for true-resistant hypertension, although recent disappointing randomized trials highlight the importance of careful patient selection. Safe and successful renal interventions begin with critical core knowledge regarding renal artery anatomy and understanding the often hostile nature of the parent vessel (pararenal aorta). Armed with fundamental knowledge about anatomy and renal ostial disease pathology, it becomes easier to understand the advantages of less traumatic access techniques and how low-profile contemporary flexible stents have enhanced outcomes. In addition to suggested techniques based on detailed understanding of the vessel architecture and pathology, we will review the current available US Food and Drug Administration-approved balloon-expandable on-label renal stents and discuss the role of intravascular ultrasound for definition of lesion severity, stent sizing, and stent apposition. The durability of renal stenting will also be discussed, as will the velocity criteria for duplex surveillance. Lastly, the current empirical data related to renal embolic protection is provided, along with insight into technical issues in this domain.

"Primary" percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty for late stent thrombosis

Renal artery thrombosis is a rare, but serious and often misdiagnosed, condition, with poor prognosis and renal functional impairment. As for the rarity of the occurrence, data about real incidence of renal stent thrombosis are lacking, ranging from 0 to 1 % depending on the study evaluated. We report the case of a 43-year-old man with nephrovascular hypertension, previously treated with renal stent implantation, with a late stent thrombosis. The diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic management was analyzed and discussed.

The Role of Sonography in Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation and Stent Placement

A literature review has been conducted to demonstrate the role of duplex sonography in evaluating renal artery stenosis (RAS) as a screening method for patients prior to percutaneous transluminal renal artery stent (PTRAS) placement. The review also evaluates the role of ultrasound surveillance following PTRAS and establishes the overall influence of ultrasound on defining stent efficacy for managing hemodynamically significant renovascular disease. Recent studies have narrowed criteria for intervention through duplex sonographic assessment of RAS to better predict patient benefit and response to stent placement. Studies using sonographic parameters evaluating patients for renal artery stenosis, criteria-dependent stent placement, and postintervention follow-up have shown improved patient response, helping ensure effective and appropriate care in RAS management.

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic nephropathy: the past, present, and future

Occlusion of the renal arteries can threaten the viability of the kidney when severe, in addition to accelerating hypertension and circulatory congestion. Renal artery stenting procedures have evolved from a treatment mainly for renovascular hypertension to a maneuver capable of recovering threatened renal function in patients with “ischemic nephropathy” and improving management of congestive heart failure. Improved catheter design and techniques have reduced, but not eliminated hazards associated with renovascular stenting. Expanded use of endovascular stent grafts to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms has introduced a new indication for renal artery stenting to protect the renal circulation when grafts cross the origins of the renal arteries. Although controversial, prospective randomized trials to evaluate the added benefit of revascularization to current medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis until now have failed to identify major benefits regarding either renal function or blood pressure control. These studies have been limited by selection bias and have been harshly criticized. While studies of tissue oxygenation using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MR establish that kidneys can adapt to reduced blood flow to some degree, more severe occlusive disease leads to cortical hypoxia associated with microvascular rarefication, inflammatory injury and fibrosis. Current research is directed toward identifying pathways of irreversible kidney injury due to vascular occlusion and to increase the potential for renal repair after restoring renal artery patency. The role of nephrologists likely will focus upon recognizing the limits of renal adaptation to vascular disease and identifying kidneys truly at risk for ischemic injury at a time point when renal revascularization can still be of benefit to recovering kidney function.

Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty with stent in elderly male patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty with stent implantation (PTRAS) has become the treatment of choice for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS). This study evaluates the long-term effects of PTRAS on hypertension and renal function in elderly patients with ARAS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent PTRAS in the geriatric division of a tertiary medical center during the period 2003-2010. The clinical data were extracted from the medical records of each patient. Changes in blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were analyzed before and after PTRAS.

RESULTS

Eighty-six stents in 81 elderly patients were placed successfully. The average age of the patients was 76.2 years (65-89 years). Mean follow-up was 31.3 months (range 12 -49 months). There was a significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure at the third day after the PTRAS procedure and the reduction in blood pressure was constant throughout the follow-up period until 36 months after PTRAS. However, there was no marked benefit to renal function outcome during the follow-up period. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 9.9% in this study group. The rate of renal artery restenosis was 14.8%. The survival rate was 96.3% for 4 years after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

It is beneficial to control blood pressure in elderly patients with ARAS up to 36 months after a PTRAS procedure. However, their renal function improvement is limited.

Revascularization in renal artery stenosis

The predominant cause of renal artery stenosis (RAS) is atherosclerosis. Clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic RAS are both direct (hypertension and kidney dysfunction) and indirect (increased cardiovascular events and mortality). However, in many cases, atherosclerotic RAS seems to be an incidental finding with no discernable effects. Antihypertensive medications such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, along with statins and aspirin, have significantly improved the medical treatment of atherosclerotic RAS. However, revascularization is still advocated in a variety of clinical settings such as the preservation of renal function, recurrent episodes of "flash" pulmonary edema, and in patients with refractory hypertension. Current management guidelines indicate "resistant hypertension" as an indication for renal artery revascularization. A large number of observational studies support revascularization for both control of high blood pressure and/or preservation of renal function. Unfortunately, the favorable effects of revascularization on these end points seen in the observational studies were not reproduced in randomized controlled trials compared to medical therapy alone. The ability for revascularization to improve control of congestive heart failure or to prevent hard cardiovascular end points (eg, myocardial infarction or stroke) has not been tested in the randomized clinical trials published to date. Hence, the efficacy of intervention remains controversial, which poses a dilemma, especially given the large number of elderly patients with resistant systolic hypertension.

Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve revascularization outcomes to restore renal function in swine atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

Reno-protective strategies are needed to improve renal outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS). Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can promote renal regeneration, but their potential for attenuating cellular injury and restoring kidney repair in ARAS has not been explored. We hypothesized that replenishment of MSC as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) would restore renal cellular integrity and improve renal function in ARAS pigs. Four groups of pigs (n = 7 each) were studied after 16 weeks of ARAS, ARAS 4 weeks after PTRA and stenting with or without adjunct intrarenal delivery of MSC (10 × 10(6) cells), and controls. Stenotic kidney blood flow (renal blood flow [RBF]) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured using multidetector computer tomography (CT). Renal microvascular architecture (micro-CT), fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress were evaluated ex vivo. Four weeks after successful PTRA, mean arterial pressure fell to a similar level in all revascularized groups. Stenotic kidney GFR and RBF remained decreased in ARAS (p = .01 and p = .02) and ARAS + PTRA (p = .02 and p = .03) compared with normal but rose to normal levels in ARAS + PTRA + MSC (p = .34 and p = .46 vs. normal). Interstitial fibrosis, inflammation, microvascular rarefaction, and oxidative stress were attenuated only in PTRA + MSC-treated pigs. A single intrarenal delivery of MSC in conjunction with renal revascularization restored renal hemodynamics and function and decreased inflammation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, microvascular loss, and fibrosis. This study suggests a unique and novel therapeutic potential for MSC in restoring renal function when combined with PTRA in chronic experimental renovascular disease.

Endovascular intervention for renal artery stenosis

Renovascular diseases are common conditions with important implications on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is present in 1-5% of patients with hypertension (HTN) in the US with the vast majority of caused by atherosclerosis. Atherosclerotic RAS is related not only to uncontrolled HTN, but also to renal dysfunction. Atherosclerotic RAS in the USA has been reported to account for approximately 14-16% of new patients requiring dialysis each year. Hence a concerted effort was made in the last decade to treat renovascular stenosis using newly developed endovascular therapies to improve cardiovascular morbidity and renal function. A review on new advances in the endovascular management of renal artery stenosis with low profile stents, embolic protection devices, and drug eluting stents is presented.

Self-expanding nitinol renal artery stents: comparison of safety and efficacy of bare versus Polyzene-F nanocoated stents in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of a Polyzene-F nanocoat on new low-profile self-expandable nitinol stents in minipig renal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten bare nitinol stents (BNS) and 10 stents coated with a 50 nm-thin Polyzene-F coating were randomly implanted into renal arteries of 10 minipigs (4- and 12-week follow-up, 5 animals/group). Thrombogenicity, on-stent surface endothelialization, vessel wall injury, late in-stent stenosis, and peristrut vessel wall inflammation were determined by quantitative angiography and postmortem histomorphometry.

RESULTS

In 6 of 10 BNS, >50% stenosis was found, but no stenosis was found in stents with a nanothin Polyzene-F coating. Histomorphometry showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) different average maximum luminal loss of 55.16% ± 8.43% at 12 weeks in BNS versus 39.77% ± 7.41% in stents with a nanothin Polyzene-F coating. Stents with a nanothin Polyzene-F coating had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower inflammation score after 12 weeks, 1.31 ± 1.17 versus 2.17 ± 0.85 in BNS. The results for vessel wall injury (0.6 ± 0.58 for Polyzene-F-coated stents; 0.72 ± 0.98 for BNS) and re-endothelialization, (1.16 ± 0.43 and 1.23 ± 0.54, respectively) were not statistically significant at 12-week follow-up. No thrombus deposition was observed on the stents at either follow-up time point.

CONCLUSION

Nitinol stents with a nanothin Polyzene-F coating successfully decreased in-stent stenosis and vessel wall inflammation compared with BNS. Endothelialization and vessel wall injury were found to be equal. These studies warrant long-term pig studies (≥120 days) because 12 weeks may not be sufficient time for complete healing; thereafter, human studies may be warranted.

Predicting blood pressure response after renal artery stenting

BACKGROUND

Although technical success of renal artery stenting (RAS) is high and adverse events are infrequent, clinical success (improved blood pressure and renal function) and durability have been less predictable. Identifying those patients who will respond to RAS could improve overall outcomes of the procedure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAS for treatment of renovascular hypertension (RVH) between 2001 and 2007 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. The primary outcome measure was blood pressure improvement or cure as judged by American Heart Association criteria. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), number of antihypertensive medications, and survival were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with blood pressure improvement at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

During the 6-year period, 129 patients (179 renal arteries) underwent stent placement for RVH. Procedural complications occurred nine patients (7.0%). Average length follow-up was 1.5 years. Follow-up data were obtained in 122 patients (95%). At last follow-up, there were significant improvements in systolic blood pressure (161 vs 144 mm Hg, P < .001), diastolic blood pressure (80 vs 73 mm Hg, P < .001), and number of antihypertensive medications (3.1 vs 2.8, P = .034). The eGFR was improved in 16% of patients, stable in 60%, and worse in 24%. By multivariate analysis, a baseline eGFR <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.9; P = .02) and female gender (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P = .04) were independent predictors of failure to achieve blood pressure improvement. By 2 and 4 years of follow-up, sustained blood pressure improvement was present in 67% of patients with a baseline eGFR of > or = 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in 31% of patients with a baseline eGFR <40 mL/min/1.73 m2. During 2 years of follow-up, survival was similar between patients with sustained blood pressure response and those without.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated for RVH who have a baseline eGFR of > or = 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 demonstrate a better response to RAS at each follow-up interval, with a significant difference at 2 to 4 years, compared with patients with an eGFR <40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Experience of stenting for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in a cardiac catheterization laboratory: technical considerations and complications

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic renal artery (RA) stenosis contributes to hypertension, renal insufficiency and end stage renal disease, and is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Percutaneous renal intervention is efficacious in treating renovascular hypertension and may be effective in stabilizing or improving renal function, thereby reducing cardiovascular risk. However, high rates of procedural complications have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the nature and frequency of complications of percutaneous renal intervention using contemporary techniques and equipment in a high-volume cardiac catheterization laboratory.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing attempted RA stenting for atherosclerotic RA stenosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory at the Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia) between June 2000 and March 2007 were enrolled in a prospective registry. Baseline clinical characteristics, procedural and technical information, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 132 RAs were stented in 106 patients during 108 procedures. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no related death, myocardial infarction, nephrectomy or dialysis. Major complications included three pseudoaneurysms (2.8%) and acute deterioration in renal function in six patients (5.5%), although renal function returned to baseline in one patient at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

RA stenting can be successfully and safely performed using contemporary techniques, and the low complication rates described should be the minimum standard for contemporary trials evaluating RA stenting.

RADAR - A randomised, multi-centre, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with haemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Prospective, international, multi-centre, randomised (1:1) trial to evaluate the clinical impact of percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting (PTRAS) on the impaired renal function measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with haemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

METHODS

Patients will be randomised to receive either PTRAS using the Dynamic Renal Stent system plus best medical treatment or best medical treatment. Renal stenting will be performed under angiographic imaging. For patients randomised to best medical treatment the degree of stenosis measured by renal duplex sonography (RDS) will be confirmed by MR angio or multi-slice CT where possible. Best medical treatment will be initiated at randomisation or post procedure (for PTRAS arm only), and adjusted as needed at all visits. Best medical treatment is defined as optimal drug therapy for control of the major risk factors (blood pressure < or = 125/80 mmHg, LDL cholesterol < or = 100 mg/dL, HbA1c < or = 6.5%). Data recordings include serum creatinine values, eGFR, brain natriuretic peptide, patients' medical history and concomitant medication, clinical events, quality of life questionnaire (SF-12v2), 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement, renal artery duplex ultrasound and echocardiography. Follow-up intervals are at 2, 6, 12 and 36 months following randomisation.The primary endpoint is the difference between treatments in change of eGFR over 12 months. Major secondary endpoints are technical success, change of renal function based on the eGFR slope change between pre-treatment and post-treatment (i.e. improvement, stabilisation, failure), clinical events overall such as renal or cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for congestive heart failure, progressive renal insufficiency (i.e. need for dialysis), need of target vessel revascularisation or target lesion revascularisation, change in average systolic and diastolic blood pressure, change in left ventricular mass index calculated from echocardiography, difference in the size of kidney (pole to pole length) measured by renal duplex sonography, total number, drug name, drug class, daily dose, regimen and Defined Daily Dose (DDD), of anti-hypertensive drugs, and change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Approximately 30 centres in Europe and South America will enrol patients. Duration of enrolment is expected to be 12 months resulting in study duration of 48 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00640406.

[Hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis]

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is often present in patients with severe hypertension and atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this setting it is important to screen patients for renovascular disease, e.g. with Duplex-ultrasound, CT- or MR-angiography. The challenge of treating these patients is to find the evidence proving that the RAS is responsible for hypertension and/or renal dysfunction. Measurement of the intra-arterial pressure gradient is necessary in order to determine hemodynamic relevance. On the other side, in these patients hypertension is often of primary and/or renoparenchymatous origin and is aggravated by a renovascular disease. This explains why hypertension cannot be cured even if a high grade stenosis has been removed. In addition, thromb- and cholesterol-embolic material is often mobilized during an invasive procedure and leads to renaparenchymatous ischemia which sustains hypertension after intervention. An individual evaluation of profit versus risk is important for the decision for or against an invasive procedure, especially since there is no sufficient evidence for a decrease of mortality after interventions of RAS. The optimal conservative treatment, including the treatment of atherosclerotic risk factors is recommended.

Serum Creatinine Stabilization Following Renal Artery Stenting

The impact of renal artery stenting on renal function in a subgroup of consecutive de novo patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis from the single operator, single center, retrospective renal stent trial is defined. Patients with inadequate preprocedure and/or follow-up renal function studies were excluded. Abnormal baseline serum creatinine (sCr) was defined as ≥1.5 mg/dL. Follow-up sCr was improved, unchanged, or worsened if the variance from baseline decreased by >20%, stayed within 20%, or increased >20%, respectively. For the total cohort (194 patients), renal function stabilized or improved in 72% of patients. Plotting 1/sCr demonstrated a decline in renal function before the procedure that stabilized following renal artery stenting. Bilateral renal artery stenting predicted normal follow-up sCr, and baseline sCr >2.1 mg/dL was associated with improvement in sCr long-term. In conclusion, renal artery stenting results in overall stabilization of renal function, and bilateral renal artery stenting seems to have added benefit.

Clinical insights into the diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery disease

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is an increasingly common contributor to hypertension and renal failure. However, not all patients with an identified obstructive atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis will have clinical improvement, even after successful percutaneous intervention. As such, there remains extensive controversy regarding optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies. Part of this controversy is the result of a paucity of well-designed prospective, randomized clinical trials, but the complex nature of the disorder and the heterogeneity of patients presenting with possible ARVD make simple diagnostic and treatment paradigms difficult to develop. This narrative review describes the latest observations concerning the prevalence, pathogenesis, natural history, diagnostic studies, and treatment options for suspected ARVD. Hopefully, this knowledge will improve the ability of clinicians to weigh risks and benefits and determine the best strategy in individual patients.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renovascular hypertension: clinical diagnosis and indications for revascularization

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is relatively common and often associated with reversible hypertension, progressive renal insufficiency, and/or coronary-independent pulmonary edema. Not all RAS is associated with renovascular hypertension. Historical and physical findings may suggest renovascular hypertension and warrant investigation for RAS. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging options include renal artery duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomographic angiography, and CO2 angiography, with each method having its own advantages and limitations. Functional tests of renal flow, which characterize RAS significance, include captopril-stimulated plasma renin activity and captopril renography. To date, no single approach has shown clear superiority either in diagnosis or identification of patients most likely to benefit from revascularization. Revascularization of RAS is recommended for severe/drug-refractory hypertension, preservation of renal function, recurrent flash pulmonary edema, or recurrent severe heart failure. Intervention response is variable, but the ongoing Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) trial, comparing medical therapy with and without stenting, should provide management guidance.

An update on renovascular hypertension

Renovascular hypertension (RVH) represents a secondary and potentially remediable form of hypertension. Elevated blood pressure is only one of a broad array of pathophysiologic consequences that are associated with decreased renal perfusion. Our ability to accurately and noninvasively detect stenotic lesions within the renal artery is growing. However, functional assessment of renal parenchyma and hemodynamic significance of renal artery lesions is still limited. Advances in endovascular techniques spurred interest in the concept of ischemic nephropathy and the effect of renal artery revascularization on renal function. Despite the relative frequency of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), there currently is no consensus on the most appropriate therapy. In this article, we focus on the two most common causes of RVH, ARAS and fibromuscular dysplasia. We discuss the therapeutic strategies, disease mechanisms, clinical findings, evolving trends, and developments.

Restenosis in gold-coated renal artery stents

BACKGROUND

Gold coating improves stent visibility under fluoroscopy. This is particularly valuable for precise stent placement during renal artery stenting (RAS). There is conflicting evidence regarding restenosis with gold-coated stents. To evaluate the effect of gold coating on restenosis after renal stenting, we reviewed the results of all patients undergoing RAS in our practice.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing RAS between June 2000 and September 2003 was performed. During this time, both gold-coated and stainless steel stents were used. Restenosis (>60% diameter) was determined by serial follow-up duplex exams (peak systolic velocity >180 cm/s and renal-aortic ratio >3.5). Restenosis rates were determined by using the Kaplan-Meier life-table method. Variables potentially affecting restenosis were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

RAS was performed in 97 arteries (78 patients). Gold-coated (NIRoyal) stents were placed in 59 arteries (48 patients). Stainless steel stents (Corinthian, Genesis, and Herculink) were placed in 38 arteries (34 patients). Patient demographics, indication for treatment, technical success, and complications did not differ between gold and stainless steel stent groups. Mean follow-up was 15 months for gold-coated stents and 18 months for stainless steel stents (NS). By life-table method, 1-year and 2-year freedom from restenosis rates were 84% and 78% in arteries treated with stainless steel stents versus 69% and 39% in those treated with gold-coated stents (P = .012, log-rank test). By multivariate analysis, only the use of gold-coated stents (P = .018; hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 8.7) and bilateral disease (P = .046; HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02 to 5.2) predicted restenosis. Stent diameter, patient demographics, and indication for RAS had no effect on restenosis by univariate analysis. According to American Heart Association criteria, 87% of patients in the stainless steel group had improved blood pressure at 1 year, compared with 77% in the gold-coated stent group (Kaplan-Meier; P = .042, log-rank test). There were no significant differences in the effect of RAS on serum creatinine levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Gold-coated renal stents had a substantially higher rate of restenosis than stainless steel stents in our series. These findings have led us to abandon the use of gold-coated stents for RAS. Patients who have received gold-coated stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis should be followed closely for evidence of restenosis.

Renovascular Hypertension: Current Concepts

Hypertension produced by renal artery occlusive disease is an important secondary form of hypertension. Clinicians commonly encounter forms of renal arterial disease of varying severity, many of which are of little hemodynamic significance when first detected. Experimental studies emphasize that transient activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is necessary for initiation of renovascular hypertension. At some point, angiotensin II activates additional mechanisms responsible for sustained increased blood pressure including sodium retention, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction related to production of reactive oxygen species. Widespread application of agents that block the renin-angiotensin system, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers, render many patients with unilateral renal arterial disease manageable primarily by medical means for many years. In the setting of high a priori likelihood of renovascular disease, recognizing the potential for disease progression during medical therapy and individually evaluating the risks and benefits of renal revascularization are important tasks. Recent prospective studies show limited, but real, benefit regarding blood pressure control for patients with atherosclerotic disease. Whether earlier renal revascularization offers benefits regarding improved morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular end point reduction is an important question to be addressed in multicenter, prospective, randomized trials. Our paradigm stresses the fact that patients with renovascular hypertension require intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk factor intervention, both before and after revascularization. Hence, management of such patients requires close attention and periodic review regarding restenosis and progression of vascular disease.

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in chronic heart failure: should we intervene?

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is most commonly caused by atherosclerosis, which is also the most common cause of chronic heart failure (CHF). One-third of patients with CHF are reported to have significant renovascular disease. The presence of RAS confers a worse outcome in studies of hypertension and coronary disease, though data are lacking for patients with CHF. As the kidney is intricately involved in the fluid retention that occurs in CHF, an adverse effect of RAS on outcome would be expected. Presentations of RAS in CHF include flash pulmonary oedema, hypertension, worsening of CHF, and worsening renal function. RAS commonly progresses and may cause worsening of renal function in patients with CHF and previously stable renal function. A variety of investigations that can safely and accurately identify RAS in CHF are available, although none is recommended in current guidelines for the management of CHF. Treatment for RAS, whether for hypertension, for renal dysfunction, or for pulmonary oedema, is at the discretion of the physician due to the lack of adequate randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of intervention. As it is not clear how RAS should be managed in CHF, screening cannot be advocated. Currently, a multicentre randomized outcome trial, which includes a cohort of patients with RAS and CHF, is in progress to provide answers in this area of uncertainty.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: current status and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a common, progressive problem that increases in prevalence with age. It can have important clinical consequences such as hypertension, pulmonary edema, and renal failure. In addition, it is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. The purpose of this review is to describe the current status of knowledge and future directions for this evolving field.

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients who are suspected of having the disease, duplex Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography remain the most promising noninvasive screening tests. Percutaneous revascularization continues to advance, and technical success is possible in the vast majority of patients. Revascularization for hypertension is of modest clinical benefit. Limited information is available on the effect of revascularization on preservation of renal function or cardiovascular events and mortality.

SUMMARY

Further studies are still needed focusing on the identification of which patients will derive benefit from percutaneous revascularization and whether intervention provides an advantage over medical therapy, particularly with respect to preservation of renal function and reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Delicate Percutaneous Renal Artery Stenting Minimizes Postoperative Renal Injury and Protects Kidney in Patients With Severe Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis and Impaired Renal Function

Percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting (PTRAS) is associated with declining renal function in a non-negligible portion of patients and is inflicted by different mechanisms, including atheroembolism. This study investigated whether delicate PTRAS to reduce atheroembolism might minimize postoperative renal injury and better preserve renal function. Patients undergoing PTRAS performed by experienced interventional cardiologists, applying coronary intervention concepts, techniques, devices and delicacy principles whenever possible, were prospectively studied. A total of 34 patients (29 M/5 F) with impaired renal function (group A, creatinine 2.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dL) and another 20 patients (16 M/4 F) with normal serum creatinine (group B, baseline creatinine 1.2 +/- 0.0 mg/dL) were studied. PTRAS was successfully performed in all but one group A patient. During a 6-month follow-up, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (130 +/- 2 versus 148 +/- 4 mmHg, P = 0.001 and 70 +/- 2 versus 78 +/- 3 mmHg, P = 0.006) and serum creatinine (2.1 +/- 0.1 versus 2.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dL, P < 0.001) were all significantly lowered in group A patients. Using a 20% change cut-off value, renal function improved in eight (24%), remained unchanged in 24 patients (73%), and deteriorated in only one patient (3%). The corresponding alterations in blood pressure and renal function were insignificant in group B patients. Patients with bilateral involvement (eleven patients) also had significantly lowered serum creatinine on follow-up. In conclusion, delicately practiced PTRAS can reduce the rate of postprocedural renal deterioration in patients with impaired renal function, and should be adopted in every renal intervention.

Outcomes of renal artery angioplasty and stenting using low-profile systems

OBJECTIVE

Renal artery percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (RPTA) and stenting (RAS) are accepted therapies for selected patients with renovascular hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency. We evaluated the outcomes and complications of RAS performed by vascular surgeons at our institution with modern low-profile systems.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed all RPTA and RAS procedures attempted with the use of low-profile systems from June 2000 to September 2003. Eighty-two patients (96 arteries) with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis were treated. Indication for treatment was hypertension in 44 (54%) and chronic renal insufficiency in 38 (46%). Technical success, complication rates, clinical success for control of hypertension or renal insufficiency, restenosis, and survival were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 1 year.

RESULTS

Ninety-three arteries were treated with stents, three with RPTA only. Primary technical success was 95%, with 98% overall technical success. Major complications occurred in 6.1% and minor complications in 1.2%. Hypertension was improved in 81% at 1 year. Renal function was improved in 23%, stable in 53%, and worse in 24% at 1 year. Restenosis was seen by routine duplex surveillance in 25% at 1 year. Restenosis associated with clinical deterioration and confirmed by angiogram was seen in 10%. The overall 3-year survival was 83%.

CONCLUSION

RPTA/RAS can be performed with low-profile systems with excellent technical success, low complication rates, and clinical outcomes that compare favorably with prior reports.

Value, limitations, and techniques of renal artery stenting

Percutaneous therapy for renovascular occlusive disease has become the preferred alternative to open renal artery revascularization. Angioplasty and stenting of renal artery stenoses has been shown to be a safe and effective option for severe hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Catheter-based treatment, especially when performed with lower-profile systems can be performed with minimal morbidity and a reliably high degree of initial technical success. The long-term beneficial effects on blood pressure control and renal function, while debated, appear to be valid. In this article, data supporting the value and limitations of renal artery stenting are reviewed, and our technique for renal artery stenting using a lower-profile platform of balloons and stents is described.