Nonepithelial Neoplasms of the Pancreas, Part 2: Malignant Tumors and Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential From the Radiologic Pathology Archives

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with solitary splenic metastasis and synchronous renal cell carcinoma: A rare case report

Synchronous pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and renal cell cancer are extremely rare. Von-Hipple-Landau syndrome is a major association. A 43-year-old male patient with left upper quadrant pain and significant weight loss was diagnosed with a synchronous pancreatic tail neuroendocrine tumor with solitary splenic metastasis and a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma of the left kidney. Sonography and a computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed a complex exophytic left renal mass and a necrotic lesion limited to the spleen. Although not apparent on preoperative imaging, distal pancreatic mass was also discovered intraoperatively. Subsequently, left radical nephrectomy, splenectomy, and distal pancreatectomy were performed, and the synchronous primaries and splenic metastasis were confirmed histopathologically. This case is unique in that it demonstrates multiple extremely rare events occurring simultaneously, namely pancreatic and kidney primaries, as well as solitary splenic metastasis.

[Exocrine meets neuroendocrine: mimickers of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originate from various epithelial or neuroectodermal tissues, can occur in any organ, including the pancreas, and are characterized by the expression of the neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are well-differentiated epithelial neoplasms with morphological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine differentiation of low, intermediate, or high grade. Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs) are clinically aggressive, high-grade (poorly differentiated) carcinomas with morphologic features suggesting neuroendocrine differentiation, a high proliferative rate (> 20 mitoses per 2 mm2 and Ki67 index > 20%), and immunohistochemical labeling for neuroendocrine markers. They include the small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma categories.Neuroendocrine-like morphology coupled with immunohistochemical markers of neuroendocrine differentiation are highly specific. However, neuroendocrine markers may also be expressed in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, which can therefore be confused with NENs. Mimickers of pancreatic NENs comprise a number of important pitfall tumors, including epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms, such as acinar cell carcinomas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), or even non-neoplastic lesions. All of these lesions have the expression of neuroendocrine markers in common, such as synaptophysin and chromogranin A, and although they are comparatively rare, they can cause considerable diagnostic problems. This review article deals with some of the most important mimickers of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and even non-neoplastic lesions, such as islet aggregation. The similarities and differences between these entities and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are highlighted, and key findings that facilitate the correct diagnosis are discussed.

Rare Solid Pancreatic Lesions on Cross-Sectional Imaging

Several solid lesions can be found within the pancreas mainly arising from the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissue. Among all pancreatic malignancies, the most common subtype is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), to a point that pancreatic cancer and PDAC are used interchangeably. But, in addition to PDAC, and to the other most common and well-known solid lesions, either related to benign conditions, such as pancreatitis, or not so benign, such as pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), there are solid pancreatic lesions considered rare due to their low incidence. These lesions may originate from a cell line with a differentiation other than exocrine/endocrine, such as from the nerve sheath as for pancreatic schwannoma or from mesenchymal cells as for solitary fibrous tumour. These rare solid pancreatic lesions may show a behaviour that ranges in a benign to highly aggressive malignant spectrum. This review includes cases of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen, pancreatic tuberculosis, solid serous cystadenoma, solid pseudopapillary tumour, pancreatic schwannoma, purely intraductal neuroendocrine tumour, pancreatic fibrous solitary tumour, acinar cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic-like giant cells, adenosquamous carcinoma, colloid carcinoma of the pancreas, primary leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas, primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma and metastases within the pancreas. Therefore, it is important to determine the correct diagnosis to ensure optimal patient management. Because of their rarity, their existence is less well known and, when depicted, in most cases incidentally, the correct diagnosis remains challenging. However, there are some typical imaging features present on cross-sectional imaging modalities that, taken into account with the clinical and biological context, contribute substantially to achieve the correct diagnosis.

A case of multiple myeloma with pancreatic involvement diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

This report highlights the importance of considering multiple myeloma in the differential diagnosis of a pancreatic tumor with bone lesions. sampling not only from the pancreatic lesion but also from bone lesions may reach an accurate diagnosis.

Extramedullary Plasmacytoma: A Rare Entity

Extramedullary plasmacytoma is an immunoproliferative disease of mature B cell that produces immunoglobulins by clonal expansion. Plasma cell neoplasms are responsible for less than 0.1% of all pancreatic masses, they can be primary or secondary to multiple myeloma (MM). We present the case of a 56-year-old man with extramedullary solitary plasmacytoma located in the pancreas, presented with abdominal pain and jaundice. Imaging characteristics are similar to those of other pancreatic diseases, and the diagnosis is confirmed by immunohistochemistry due to the presence of a homogeneous infiltrate of monoclonal plasma cells, which typically express CD38 and CD 138 markers and the presence of kappa/lambda light chains.

Synchronous or metachronous presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor versus secondary lesion to pancreas in patients affected by renal cell carcinoma. Systematic review

The simultaneous or metachronous occurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (panNET) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may represent a rare coincidence or a manifestation of von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). These two malignancies share both radiological and cytopathological features, making the differential diagnosis very challenging. In this review, we collected all cases of concurrent diagnosis of localized panNET and RCC, with or without VHL, as reported in the literature to date. We aimed to provide an insight into the differential diagnosis between panNET and RCC pancreatic metastasis with a focus on the optimal therapeutic algorithm depending on the diagnosis. We performed literature research in PubMed library databases for articles about coexisting panNET and RCC published from 2001 to 2018. We selected nine articles with a total of 13 patients, including one treated at our institution. Patients' median age was 49 years and eight out of 13 patients were women. VHL was diagnosed in nine cases. Most patients underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC (9/13) and a clear cell renal carcinoma variant was identified in six cases. The diagnosis of panNET was synchronous with RCC detection in nine cases and metachronous in four cases. The diameter of the pancreatic lesion was >2 cm in six cases. In two cases the panNET was misdiagnosed as metastatic RCC by radiological tests. Somatostatin receptor scanning was performed only in our patient (Octreoscan) showing intense uptake in the pancreatic mass. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration of the pancreatic lesion was performed in four patients: in two cases the panNET was confused with metastatic RCC by cytological analysis. Most patients underwent pancreatic surgery (10/13) without histological confirmation. Clear cell panNET was recognized in six cases, while mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm was diagnosed in one patient. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining showed positivity to typical neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A and synaptophysin) in all reported tested cases (8/8). Three patients underwent systemic treatment: two patients received sunitinib and one patient interleukin-2 (IL-2). Other neoplasms were observed in seven patients, of whom six were affected by VHL syndrome. When neoplastic lesions are recognized in both the kidney and pancreas, panNET and RCC pancreatic metastasis are often misdiagnosed due to similar radiological and cytopathological features. An accurate differential diagnosis is crucial and IHC plays a central role in distinguishing the two entities. The therapeutic algorithm may change depending on the diagnosis: while pancreatic RCC metastases benefit from resection, in panNETs and VHL the indication for surgery must be carefully evaluated.

Pancreatic liposarcoma: a case report

An 81-year-old woman who had undergone total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer 12 years earlier was found to have a tumor in the tail of the pancreas. Four years earlier, skin, lung, and mediastinal lymph node metastases had appeared. Computed tomography (CT) showed a mass 26 mm in diameter in the tail of the pancreas. Thereafter, the pancreatic tumor increased in size, while the lung metastases remained stable. Unenhanced CT at the time of first detection showed that the tumor was heterogeneous, with low-attenuation areas indicating fat components. As the tumor grew, the fat components became unclear. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed. The tumor was diagnosed as dedifferentiated liposarcoma with a well-differentiated liposarcoma component at the tumor margin. The pancreas is an extremely rare site of primary liposarcoma. In the present case, a pancreatic liposarcoma appeared during follow-up of thyroid cancer, and the changes over time were able to be observed with CT.

Features of primary pancreatic lymphoma: A bi-institutional review with an emphasis on typical and atypical imaging features

BACKGROUND

Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is a rare neoplasm. Being able to distinguish it from other pancreatic malignancies such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is important for appropriate management. Unlike PDAC, PPL is highly sensitive to chemotherapy and usually does not require surgery. Therefore, being able to identify PPL preoperatively will not only direct physicians towards the correct avenue of treatment, it will also avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.

AIM

To evaluate the typical and atypical multi-phasic computed tomography (CT) imaging features of PPL.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of the clinical, radiological, and pathological records of all subjects with pathologically proven PPL who presented to our institutions between January 2000 and December 2020. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this investigation. The collected data were analyzed for subject demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory values, CT imaging features, and the treatment received. Presence of all CT imaging findings including size, site, morphology and imaging characteristics of PPL such as the presence or absence of nodal, vascular and ductal involvement in these subjects were recorded. Only those subjects who had a pre-treatment multiphasic CT of the abdomen were included in the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases of PPL were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2020 (mean age 66 years; 13 males/16 females). All twenty-nine subjects were symptomatic but only 4 of the 29 subjects (14%) had B symptoms. Obstructive jaundice occurred in 24% of subjects. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase was seen in 81% of cases, whereas elevated cancer antigen 19-9 levels were present in only 10% of cases for which levels were recorded. The vast majority (90%) of tumors involved the pancreatic head and uncinate process. Mean tumor size was 7.8 cm (range, 4.0-13.8 cm). PPL presented homogenous hypoenhancement on CT in 72% of cases. Small volume peripancreatic lymphadenopathy was seen in 28% of subjects. Tumors demonstrated encasement of superior mesenteric vessels in 69% of cases but vascular stenosis or occlusion only manifested in 5 out of the twenty-nine individuals (17%). Mild pancreatic duct dilatation was also infrequent and seen in only 17% of cases, whereas common bile duct (CBD) dilation was seen in 41% of subjects. Necrosis occurred in 10% of cases. Size did not impact the prevalence of pancreatic and CBD dilation, necrosis, or mesenteric root infiltration (P = 0.525, P = 0.294, P = 0.543, and P = 0.097, respectively). Pancreatic atrophy was not present in any of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

PPL is an uncommon diagnosis best made preoperatively to avoid unnecessary surgery and ensure adequate treatment. In addition to the typical CT findings of PPL, such as homogeneous hypoenhancement, absence of vascular stenosis and occlusion despite encasement, and peripancreatic lymphadenopathy, this study highlighted many less typical findings, including small volume necrosis and pancreatic and bile duct dilation.

Atypical and uncommon CT and MR imaging presentations of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) occasionally have atypical and uncommon imaging presentations that can present a diagnostic dilemma and result in false interpretation. This article aimed to illustrate these CT and MR imaging findings, including isoattenuating PDAC, coexisting acute pancreatitis, PDAC with a cystic feature, groove PDAC, diffuse PDAC, hypointensity on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), multifocal PDAC, intratumoral calcification, and extrapancreatic invasion with a barely discernable mass. A subset of PDACs with atypical features are occasionally encountered during routine clinical practice. Knowledge of and attention to these atypical and uncommon variable imaging features may allow radiologists to avoid misinterpretation and a delayed diagnosis.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the pancreatic neck: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a relatively rare disease that is often confused with pancreatic cancer or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The histological features of IMTs show that tissue from this type of tumor contains an intermingling of fibroblast and myofibroblast proliferation, accompanied by a varying degree of inflammatory cell infiltration.

CASE SUMMARY

The management of an IMT occurring at the neck of the pancreas is presented in this paper. A 66-year-old female patient was diagnosed with a pancreatic neck mass after a series of tests. The patient underwent enucleation of the pancreatic neck tumor after a pathological diagnosis of IMT. Previous research on the clinical features, pathological diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic IMTs was reviewed. Compared with previous reports, this is a unique case of enucleation of a pancreatic IMT.

CONCLUSION

The enucleation of pancreatic IMTs may be a safe and efficient surgical method for managing such tumors with a better prognosis. Further cases are required to explore surgical measures for pancreatic IMTs.

Primary Pancreatic Lymphoma: Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management

BACKGROUND

Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is a rare disease representing 0.1% of all malignant lymphomas, which lacks well-defined diagnostic and therapeutic protocols. We conducted a systematic review to analyze demographic, diagnostic and therapeutic features of PPL.

METHODS

This review identified small series and single case reports. Sources were MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane library from January 2001 to December 2020. Data were screened, extracted and the risk of bias analyzed by three independent reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 107 eligible papers (17 small series, 90 single case reports) describing 266 patients were identified. Patients had a median age of 53.1 (range 3-86) years and were males in 64.6% of cases. Abdominal pain and jaundice were the most common presenting symptoms, affecting 75.3% and 41.8% of patients, respectively. PPL had a median size of 60.6 mm (range 16-200) and it was localized in the pancreatic head in 63.7% of cases. At diagnosis most patients underwent ultrasonography followed by computed tomography. PPL typically showed low echogenicity, and lower contrast enhancement than solid tumors. Histopathological specimens were obtained by percutaneous or endoscopic biopsies in 47.7% of patients; abdominal surgery was performed in 33.5% of cases. Overall, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most frequent histological diagnosis (53.6%). However, patients aged <18 years were affected by Burkitt lymphoma in 52.4% of cases. Most patients (53.6%) received immunochemotherapy (IC) or IC plus radiotherapy (14%). Demolitive surgery appeared to be associated with impaired survival. Central nervous system (CNS) relapse or progression was observed in 20% of patients.

CONCLUSION

PPL is a rare entity, with some peculiar features at modern imaging. For diagnostic purposes percutaneous or endoscopic biopsies might be preferable, as opposed to surgery. No definite data is available about the optimal treatment, which should be tailored on the histological type and associated with CNS prophylaxis.

Primary pancreatic lymphoma: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome

Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is a rare disease representing 0.1% of malignant lymphomas, which lacks well-defined diagnostic and therapeutic protocols.

OBJECTIVES

To describe PPL clinical, diagnostic and histological characteristics, together with therapy and outcome, in a relatively large series of patients.

METHODS

The study includes 39 PPL patients, aged ≥15 years, observed from January 2005 to December 2018, in 8 Italian Institutions.

RESULTS

The main symptoms were abdominal pain (58%) and jaundice (47%). Lactate dehydrogenase serum levels were elevated in 43% of patients. Histological specimens were mostly obtained by percutaneous (41%) or endoscopic (36%) biopsy, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most frequent (69%) histological diagnosis. Chemotherapy was administered alone in 65% of patients, with radiotherapy in 17%, or after surgery in 9%. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 62%, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) 44%. Debulking surgery (with or without chemotherapy) was associated with a significant worse OS. Three (9.4%) of 32 high-grade patients experienced a central nervous system (CNS) relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

PPL is rare, often high-grade, with symptoms and localization similar to other pancreatic malignancies. Biopsy should be the preferred diagnostic method. High-grade PPL should undergo CNS prophylaxis.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report and Literature Review

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare. They are characterized by myofibroblastic spindle cell proliferation with a varying degree of inflammatory cell infiltration. IMT can occur in any anatomic location but has been reported in the lung, mesentery, and omentum, mainly in children or young adults. It rarely occurs in the pancreas and is often difficult to distinguish from other tumors, including some malignant ones. Therefore, it can be challenging to make a radiological diagnosis of IMT. Here, we present a case of IMT that occurred in the pancreas head of a middle-aged female. The patient’s ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings are presented along with a review of the literature.

Pancreatic tumor in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a diagnostic challenge

Background

The co-occurrence of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic tumor (PaT) has been previously reported. Pure AIP cases have favorable prognosis and are primarily treated with steroids, while AIP cases with PaT are associated with poor prognosis where the primary management is pancreatic resection. However, it’s a challenge to timely identify the concurrent PaT in AIP because of their similar clinical and radiological manifestations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data in two medical centers from January 2010 to April 2019. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) completion of abdominal CT imaging before invasive procedures to the pancreas, 2) a final diagnosis of type 1 AIP using the 2011 international consensus diagnostic criteria, 3) follow-up duration of at least one month unless AIP and PaT were identified simultaneously. The presence of PaT in AIP was made based on histopathological confirmation, and the absence of PaT in AIP was defined as no pathological or radiological evidence of concurrent PaT. Clinical and radiological characteristics including gender, age, surveillance period, serum IgG4 and Ca-199 levels, biopsy, extrapancreatic involvement, CT and MR (if performed) imaging characteristics were compared between AIP with and without PaT. The Fisher’s exact test was used for qualitative variables, and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 74 patients with type 1 AIP were included, of which 5 (6.7%) had the concurrent PaT. The subtypes were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (3/5), solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma in the pancreas (1/5) and cholangiocarcinoma in the pancreatic segment (1/5), respectively. Gender (p = 0.044), the pattern of pancreatic enlargement (p = 0.003), heterogeneity (p = 0.015), low-density (p = 0.004) on CT and rim enhancement on MRI (p = 0.050) differed significantly between AIP with and without PaT. None of the low-density characteristics on CT or other assessed MRI characteristics could significantly differentiate the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Female, focal pancreatic enlargement, pancreatic heterogeneity, low-density on CT and rim enhancement on MRI are suggestive of the concurrent PaT in type 1 AIP. The characteristics of low-density on CT or other MRI characteristics did not provide further diagnostic values.