Effect of alpha-adrenergic stimulation and its blockade on glucose turnover in man

Philip E. Cryer, MD: Seminal Contributions to the Understanding of Hypoglycemia and Glucose Counterregulation and the Discovery of HAAF (Cryer Syndrome)

Optimized glycemic control prevents and slows the progression of long-term complications in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In healthy individuals, a decrease in plasma glucose below the physiological range triggers defensive counterregulatory responses that restore euglycemia. Many individuals with diabetes harbor defects in their defenses against hypoglycemia, making iatrogenic hypoglycemia the Achilles heel of glycemic control. This Profile in Progress focuses on the seminal contributions of Philip E. Cryer, MD, to our understanding of hypoglycemia and glucose counterregulation, particularly his discovery of the syndrome of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF).

Microdialysis assessment of peripheral metabolism in critical limb ischemia after endovascular revascularization

Background

Critical limb ischemia is a chronic pathologic condition defined by the lack of blood flow in peripheral circulation. Microdialysis is a well-known and sensitive method for the early detection of tissue ischemia. The aim of the present study was to use microdialysis in order to analyse cellular metabolism changes after peripheral endovascular revascularization.

Methods

Ten patients diagnosed with critical limb ischemia was enrolled. CMA 60 (CMA^® - Solna, Sweden) catheter with a 20 kDa cut-off was placed subcutaneously on the anterior aspect of the foot of both limbs. Samples were collected starting 12-hours before surgery and throughout the following 72-hours, using a CMA 600 (CMA^® - Solna, Sweden) microdialysis analyser.

Results

Technical revascularization was successful in all cases. The cannulation was well tolerated in all patients. The site of catheter insertion healed easily in few days without infective complications in any case. Two patients underwent major amputation. After revascularization, glucose showed a strong increase (mean, 5.86 ± 1.52 mMol/L, p = .008). No restoration of the circadian rhythm was noted in patients who underwent major amputation. Glycerol concentration curves were not deductibles in both the ischemic and the control limbs (mean, 148.43 ± 42.13 mMol/L vs 178.44 ± 75.93 mMol/L, p = .348). Within the first 24-hours after revascularization, lactate concentration raised strongly (6.58 ± 1.56 mMol/L, p = .002): thereafter, it immediately decreased to a concentration similar to the control level (1.71 ± 1.69 mMol/L). In both patients who underwent major amputation, lactate did not show the typical peak of the successful revascularization. The trend of the lactate/pyruvate ratio after a brief initial decrease of the ratio increased again in both the patients who finally underwent amputation.

Conclusions

Restoration of glucose and glycerol circadian rhythm, coupled with low lactate concentration and lactate/pyruvate ratio seemed to be linked to good surgical outcome.

Greater systemic lipolysis in women compared with men during moderate-dose infusion of epinephrine and/or norepinephrine

Women have lower circulating catecholamine levels during metabolic perturbations, such as exercise or hypoglycemia, but similar rates of systemic lipolysis. This suggests women may be more sensitive to the lipolytic action of catecholamines, while maintaining similar glucoregulatory effects. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to determine whether women have higher rates of systemic lipolysis compared with men in response to matched peripheral infusion of catecholamines, but similar rates of glucose turnover. Healthy, nonobese women (n = 11) and men (n = 10) were recruited and studied on 3 separate days with the following infusions: epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), or the two combined. Tracer infusions of glycerol and glucose were used to determine systemic lipolysis and glucose turnover, respectively. Following basal measurements of substrate kinetics, the catecholamine infusion commenced, and measures of substrate kinetics continued for 60 min. Catecholamine concentrations were similarly elevated in women and men during each infusion: Epi, 182-197 pg/ml and NE, 417-507 pg/ml. There was a significant sex difference in glycerol rate of appearance and rate of disappearance with the catecholamine infusions (P < 0.0001), mainly due to a significantly greater glycerol turnover during the first 30 min of each infusion: glycerol rate of appearance during Epi was only 268 +/- 18 vs. 206 +/- 21 micromol/min in women and men, respectively; during NE, only 173 +/- 13 vs. 153 +/- 17 micromol/min, and during Epi+NE, 303 +/- 24 vs. 257 +/- 21 micromol/min. No sex differences were observed in glucose kinetics under any condition. In conclusion, these data suggest that women are more sensitive to the lipolytic action of catecholamines, but have no difference in their glucoregulatory response. Thus the lower catcholamine levels observed in women vs. men during exercise and other metabolic perturbations may allow women to maintain a similar or greater level of lipid mobilization while minimizing changes in glucose turnover.

The haemodynamic and metabolic effects of epinephrine in experimental hyperdynamic septic shock

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of epinephrine (EPI) infusion on vital organ blood flow and metabolic variables during sepsis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomised placebo-controlled animal trial in an animal laboratory.

ANIMALS

Seven merino cross-ewes.

INTERVENTIONS

Chronic implantation of flow probes (aorta, renal, mesenteric and coronary artery and sagittal sinus). Induction of sepsis by intravenous injection of E. coli. Random allocation of sheep to EPI (0.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or vehicle for 6 h.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

E. coli induced hypotension and hyperlactataemia and increased cardiac output, renal, mesenteric and coronary blood flows. Compared to vehicle, EPI restored mean arterial blood pressure (69 vs. 86 mmHg) and further increased cardiac output (6.4 vs. 7.1 l/min). EPI, however, decreased renal blood flow (330 vs. 247 ml/min) and renal conductance. EPI also reduced mesenteric and coronary conductance without changes in flows. Compared to vehicle, EPI increased urine output (293 vs. 544 ml/6 h) but not creatinine clearance. EPI increased lactate (1.8 vs. 15.7 mmol/l) with accompanying acidosis (serum bicarbonate: 25.2 vs. 15.7 mmol/l), hyperglycaemia (2.6 vs. 13.5 mmol/l) and hypokalaemia (4.3 vs. 3.0 mmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperdynamic sepsis increased blood flow to heart, gut and kidney. Although EPI infusion further increased cardiac output, blood pressure and myocardial performance, it was also associated with potent metabolic effects, decreased mesenteric, coronary and renal conductance and a significant reduction in renal blood flow.

Epinephrine effects on insulin-glucose dynamics: the labeled IVGTT two-compartment minimal model approach

The hyperglycemic effects of epinephrine (Epi) are established; however, the modulation of Epi-stimulated endogenous glucose production (EGP) by glucose and insulin in vivo in humans is less clear. Our aim was to determine the effect of exogenously increased plasma Epi concentrations on insulin and glucose dynamics. In six normal control subjects, we used the labeled intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) interpreted with the two-compartment minimal model, which provides not only glucose effectiveness (S(G)(2*)), insulin sensitivity (S(I)(2*)), and plasma clearance rate (PCR) at basal state, but also the time course of EGP. Subjects were randomly studied during either saline or Epi infusion (1.5 microg/min). Exogenous Epi infusion increased plasma Epi concentration to a mean value of 2,034 +/- 138 pmol/l. During the stable-label IVGTT, plasma glucose, tracer glucose, and insulin concentrations were significantly higher in the Epi study. The hormone caused a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in PCR in the Epi state when compared with the basal state. The administration of Epi has a striking effect on EGP profiles: the nadir of the EGP profiles occurs at 21 +/- 7 min in the basal state and at 55 +/- 13 min in the Epi state (P < 0.05). In conclusion, we have shown by use of a two-compartment minimal model of glucose kinetics that elevated plasma Epi concentrations have profound effects at both hepatic and tissue levels. In particular, at the liver site, this hormone deeply affects, in a time-dependent fashion, the inhibitory effect of insulin on glucose release. Our findings may explain how even a normal subject may have the propensity to develop glucose intolerance under the influence of small increments of Epi during physiological stress.

Systemic and local adrenergic regulation of muscle glucose utilization during hypoglycemia in healthy subjects

Adrenergic responses are crucial for hypoglycemic recovery. Epinephrine increases glucose production, lipolysis, and peripheral insulin resistance as well as blood flow and glucose delivery. Sympathetic activation causes vasoconstriction and reduces glucose delivery. To determine the effects of alpha- and beta-adrenergic activity on muscle glucose uptake during hypoglycemia, we studied forearm blood flow (FBF) (plethysmography), arteriovenous glucose difference (AV-diff), and forearm glucose uptake (FGU) during insulin infusion with 60 min of euglycemia followed by 60 min of hypoglycemia. Twelve healthy subjects (27 plus minus 5 years of age) were randomized to intravenous propranolol (IV PROP, 80 microg/min), intravenous phentolamine (IV PHEN, 500 microg/min), intra-arterial propranolol (IA PROP, 25 microg/min), intra-arterial phentolamine (IA PHEN, 12 microg/min per 100 ml forearm tissue), and saline (SAL). FBF increased during hypoglycemia with SAL (P < 0.001) but not with IA or IV PROP. FGU (P = 0.015) and AV-diff (P = 0.099) fell during hypoglycemia with IA PROP but not with IV PROP. FBF increased during hypoglycemia with IA and IV PHEN (P < 0.005). AV-diff fell during hypoglycemia with IA and IV PHEN (P < 0.01), but FGU was unchanged. Blood pressure fell (P < 0.001), and adrenergic and neuroglycopenic symptoms increased with IV PHEN (P < 0.01). Thus, systemic but not local propranolol prevents a decrease in forearm glucose extraction during hypoglycemia, suggesting that epinephrine increases peripheral muscular insulin resistance through systemic effects. alpha-Adrenergic activation inhibits vasodilation and helps maintain brain glucose delivery.

Intense exercise has unique effects on both insulin release and its roles in glucoregulation: implications for diabetes

In intense exercise (>80% VO(2max)), unlike at lesser intensities, glucose is the exclusive muscle fuel. It must be mobilized from muscle and liver glycogen in both the fed and fasted states. Therefore, regulation of glucose production (GP) and glucose utilization (GU) have to be different from exercise at <60% VO(2max), in which it is established that the portal glucagon-to-insulin ratio causes the less than or equal to twofold increase in GP. GU is subject to complex regulation by insulin, plasma glucose, alternate substrates, other humoral factors, and muscle factors. At lower intensities, plasma glucose is constant during postabsorptive exercise and declines during postprandial exercise (and often in persons with diabetes). During such exercise, insulin secretion is inhibited by beta-cell alpha-adrenergic receptor activation. In contrast, in intense exercise, GP rises seven- to eightfold and GU rises three- to fourfold; therefore, glycemia increases and plasma insulin decreases minimally, if at all. Indeed, even an increase in insulin during alpha-blockade or during a pancreatic clamp does not prevent this response, nor does pre-exercise hyperinsulinemia due to a prior meal or glucose infusion. At exhaustion, GU initially decreases more than GP, which leads to greater hyperglycemia, requiring a substantial rise in insulin for 40--60 min to restore pre-exercise levels. Absence of this response in type 1 diabetes leads to sustained hyperglycemia, and mimicking it by intravenous infusion restores the normal response. Compelling evidence supports the conclusion that the marked catecholamine responses to intense exercise are responsible for both the GP increment (that occurs even during glucose infusion and postprandially) and the restrained increase of GU. These responses are normal in persons with type 1 diabetes, who often report exercise-induced hyperglycemia, and in whom the clinical challenge is to reproduce the recovery period hyperinsulinemia. Intense exercise in type 2 diabetes requires additional study.

Alpha-adrenoceptor involvement in catecholamine-induced hyperglycaemia in conscious fasted rabbits

In conscious fasted rabbits an intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (20 micrograms kg-1 min-1) induced hyperglycaemia. The increase in blood glucose was accompanied by a modest increase in insulin secretion and a reduction of liver glycogen. Muscle glycogen and blood lactate levels were not altered by treatment with phenylephrine. Prazosin, 1 mg kg-1 s.c., partially attenuated phenylephrine-induced hyperglycaemia. Phenoxybenzamine infusion (16.6 micrograms kg-1 min-1) for 15 min suppressed the increase in blood glucose and the reduction in liver glycogen evoked by phenylephrine. This alpha-adrenoceptor blocker also clearly attenuated the blood glucose elevation observed on infusing adrenaline at 0.3 microgram kg-1 min-1. Blockade by phenoxybenzamine of phenylephrine- and adrenaline-induced hyperglycaemia was not accompanied by a significant increase in immunoreactive insulin plasma levels. Yohimbine infused at a rate of 20 micrograms kg-1 min-1, also completely blocked phenylephrine-induced hyperglycaemia. This suppressor effect was accompanied by a marked rebound in insulin secretion. It is concluded that in normal fasted rabbits stimulation of alpha-adrenoceptors induces hyperglycaemia. The increase in blood glucose depends mainly on liver glycogenolysis and inhibition of insulin secretion. Separate blockade of each component suffices to reduce alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated hyperglycaemia.

Studies on the insulin-antagonistic effect of catecholamines in normal man. Evidence for the importance of beta 2-receptors

The insulin-antagonistic effect of adrenaline was studied in seven healthy subjects with the euglycaemic clamp technique using two insulin infusion rates (40 and 1200 mU X (m2)-1 min-1). The adrenergic receptor mediating the adrenaline effect was characterized by concomitant infusion of propranolol (beta 1 + beta 2-antagonist) or metoprolol (beta 1-antagonist). Each subject was studied four times (placebo, adrenaline, adrenaline + propranolol, adrenaline + metoprolol). Glucose turnover was measured with D(3-3H)-glucose. Similar plasma insulin levels were reached in all studies with the two insulin infusion rates (mean; placebo 51 +/- 3 and 7421 +/- 337 mU/l respectively). Glucose production was completely inhibited by the low insulin level during placebo infusion. Adrenaline antagonized this effect so that a significant glucose production was seen at the low but not at the high insulin level. Propranolol, but not metoprolol, reversed this insulin-antagonistic effect of adrenaline. Glucose utilization increased from 2.53 +/- 0.17 to 7.28 +/- 0.88 mg X kg-1 X min-1 during placebo when the insulin levels were increased from 4 +/- 0.3 to 51 +/- 3 mU/l. Increasing the insulin levels 150-fold to approximately 7500 mU/l only doubled the glucose utilization (14.68 +/- 1.14 mg X kg-1 X min-1). Adrenaline induced a pronounced inhibition of glucose utilization at both insulin levels (78% and 37% inhibition respectively). Propranolol, but not metoprolol, prevented this effect of adrenaline. Thus, physiological adrenaline levels exert a pronounced insulin-antagonistic effect which is mediated by beta 2-receptor stimulation. The inhibitory effect on glucose uptake is maintained even at high insulin levels when hepatic glucose production is completely abolished.

Enhanced glycemic responsiveness to epinephrine in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is the result of the inability to secrete insulin. Augmented insulin secretion normally limits the glycemic, but not the lipolytic or ketogenic, response to epinephrine in humans

To determine if the enhanced glycemic response to epinephrine in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is the result of increased adrenergic sensitivity per se, increased glucagon secretion, decreased insulin secretion, or a combination of these, plasma epinephrine concentration-response curves were determined in insulin-infused (initially euglycemic) patients with IDDM and nondiabetic subjects on two occasions: once when insulin and glucagon were free to change (control study), and again when insulin and glucagon were held constant (islet clamp study). During the control study, plasma C-peptide doubled, and glucagon did not change in the nondiabetic subjects, whereas plasma C-peptide did not change but glucagon increased in the patients. The patients with IDDM exhibited threefold greater increments in plasma glucose, largely the result of greater increments in glucose production. This enhanced glycemic response was apparent with 30-min increments in epinephrine to plasma concentrations as low as 100-200 pg/ml, levels that occur commonly under physiologic conditions. During the islet clamp study (somatostatin infusion with insulin and glucagon replacement at fixed rates), the heightened glycemic response was unaltered in the patients with IDDM, but the nondiabetic subjects exhibited an enhanced glycemic response to epinephrine indistinguishable from that of patients with IDDM. In contrast, the FFA, glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate responses were unaltered. Thus, we conclude the following: Short, physiologic increments in plasma epinephrine cause greater increments in plasma glucose in patients with IDDM than in nondiabetic subjects, a finding likely to be relevant to glycemic control during the daily lives of such patients as well as during the stress of intercurrent illness. Enhanced glycemic responsiveness of patients with IDDM to epinephrine is not the result of increased sensitivity of adrenergic receptor-effector mechanisms per se nor of their increased glucagon secretory response; rather, it is the result of their inability to augment insulin secretion. Augmented insulin secretion, albeit restrained, normally limits the glycemic response, but not the lipolytic or ketogenic responses, to epinephrine in humans.

Catecholamines are mitogenic in 3T3 and bovine aortic endothelial cells

We have found that catecholamines stimulate DNA synthesis and centrosomal separation in 3T3 and bovine aortic endothelial cells cultured in the absence of serum or added growth factors. The mitogenic effect is mediated by an alpha 1-adrenergic receptor, as it is inhibited by phentolamine and prazosin but not by propranolol or yohimbine. The physiological and pathological consequences of this effect remain to be determined.

Beta-adrenergic blockade is more effective in suppressing adrenaline-induced glucose production in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes

To examine whether diabetes affects the ability of beta-blockade to suppress adrenaline-stimulated hepatic glucose production, we infused adrenaline with and without propranolol into normal subjects and diabetic patients receiving a constant insulin infusion in basal amounts. In normal subjects, propranolol did not block the transient 50%-60% rise in glucose production during adrenaline infusion. In contrast, propranolol virtually abolished adrenaline-induced hyperglycaemia and glucose production was virtually abolished by propranolol in the diabetic patients, even though they demonstrated an exaggerated response to adrenaline alone (persistent increase in glucose production of 50%-90% above baseline). When insulin was infused together with adrenaline and propranolol in normal subjects in doses exceeding those given to the diabetics (plasma insulin rose threefold), the rise in glucose production was still threefold greater than in the diabetic patients (p less than 0.02). We conclude that beta-blockade is more effective in suppressing the hepatic response to adrenaline in diabetics than in normal subjects. Our data may explain why diabetic subjects are more vulnerable to hypoglycaemia during treatment with propranolol.

Effect of dobutamine on insulin requirement in diabetic ketoacidosis

Images