Niu HG, Gao RZ, Zhu FY, Zhang GF. Clinical effects of duodenoscopy, laparoscopy, and choledochoscopy combined with cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in treatment of acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014;
22:5688-5692. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v22.i36.5688]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To observe the clinical effects of duodenoscopy, laparoscopy, and choledochoscopy combined with cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in the treatment of acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis (AOSC).
METHODS: Ninety-six patients with AOSC treated at our hospital were randomly divided into either an observation group or a control group. Both groups underwent routine examination and treatment. The observation group additionally underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD) + endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (EST) + laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combination therapy, and the control group received open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration. Direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, white blood cell count, serum albumin, and cholinesterase were compared between the two groups. Operative time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, time to anal exhaust, hospital stay, postoperative complications, residual stones, and incision infection were also compared.
RESULTS: Direct bilirubin, alanine transaminase, white blood cell count, albumin, and cholinesterase levels at postoperative week 1 were significantly better in the observation group than in the control group (6.63 µmol/L ± 1.82 µmol/L vs 11.34 µmol/L ± 2.8 µmol/L; 23.38 µmol/L ± 10.47 µmol/L vs 40.25 µmol/L ± 16.30 µmol/L; 6.53 × 109/L ± 2.13 × 109/L vs 9.65 × 109/L ± 3.10 × 109/L; 40.34 g/L ± 6.53 g/L vs 33.64 g/L ± 5.21 g/L; 7.10 U/L ± 1.82 U/L vs 4.93 U/L ± 1.63 U/L; P < 0.05). Operative time did not differ significantly between the two groups (128.34 min ± 12.58 min vs 118.58 min ± 11.67 min, P > 0.05). Blood loss, time to anal exhaust and hospital stay were significantly better in the observation group (54.20 mL ± 10.10 mL vs 252.50 mL ± 75.16 mL; 23.16 h ± 3.64 h vs 70.25 h ± 10.53 h; 5.50 d ± 1.13 d vs 15.50 d ± 4.38 d; P < 0.05). During 9 to 12 mo of follow-up, the rate of wound infection and residual stones was significantly lower in the observation group (6.25% vs 31.25%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: ERCP + ENBD + EST + LCBDE combination therapy can effectively improve physiological indexes, reduce intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time, and the incidence of complications, and improve the prognosis and quality of life in AOSC patients.
Collapse