Multiparametric corticofugal modulation of collicular duration-tuned neurons: modulation in the amplitude domain

Lemniscal Corticothalamic Feedback in Auditory Scene Analysis

Sound information is transmitted from the ear to central auditory stations of the brain via several nuclei. In addition to these ascending pathways there exist descending projections that can influence the information processing at each of these nuclei. A major descending pathway in the auditory system is the feedback projection from layer VI of the primary auditory cortex (A1) to the ventral division of medial geniculate body (MGBv) in the thalamus. The corticothalamic axons have small glutamatergic terminals that can modulate thalamic processing and thalamocortical information transmission. Corticothalamic neurons also provide input to GABAergic neurons of the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) that receives collaterals from the ascending thalamic axons. The balance of corticothalamic and TRN inputs has been shown to refine frequency tuning, firing patterns, and gating of MGBv neurons. Therefore, the thalamus is not merely a relay stage in the chain of auditory nuclei but does participate in complex aspects of sound processing that include top-down modulations. In this review, we aim (i) to examine how lemniscal corticothalamic feedback modulates responses in MGBv neurons, and (ii) to explore how the feedback contributes to auditory scene analysis, particularly on frequency and harmonic perception. Finally, we will discuss potential implications of the role of corticothalamic feedback in music and speech perception, where precise spectral and temporal processing is essential.

Phasic Off responses of auditory cortex underlie perception of sound duration

It has been proposed that sound information is separately streamed into onset and offset pathways for parallel processing. However, how offset responses contribute to auditory perception remains unclear. Here, loose-patch and whole-cell recordings in awake mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) reveal that a subset of pyramidal neurons exhibit a transient "Off" response, with its onset tightly time-locked to the sound termination and its frequency tuning similar to that of the transient "On" response. Both responses are characterized by excitation briefly followed by inhibition, with the latter mediated by parvalbumin (PV) inhibitory neurons. Optogenetically manipulating sound-evoked A1 responses at different temporal phases or artificially creating phantom sounds in A1 further reveals that the A1 phasic On and Off responses are critical for perceptual discrimination of sound duration. Our results suggest that perception of sound duration is dependent on precisely encoding its onset and offset timings by phasic On and Off responses.

Predictive factors of outcome in cervical dystonia following deep brain stimulation: an individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy has been suggested to be a beneficial alternative in cervical dystonia (CD) for patients who failed nonsurgical treatments. This individual patient data meta-analysis compared the efficacy of DBS in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) versus subthalamic nucleus (STN) and identified possible predictive factors for CD.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) were searched for studies with no publication date restrictions. The primary outcomes were normalized by calculating the relative change in TWSTRS total scores and subscale scores at the last follow-up. Data were analyzed mainly using Pearson's correlation coefficients and a stepwise multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (86 patients, 58 with GPi-DBS and 28 with STN-DBS) were eligible. Patients showed significant improvement in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) (52.5 ± 11.6 vs 21.9 ± 14.9, P < 0.001) scores at the last follow-up (22.0 ± 14.3 months), compared with scores at baseline, with a mean improvement of 56.6% (P < 0.001) (54.9% in severity, 63.2% in disability, 41.7% in pain). There was no significant difference in the improvement (%) of the total TWSTRS scores in 3 years for the GPI and STN groups (58.1 ± 22.6 vs 47.5 ± 39.2, P > 0.05). Age at surgery and age at symptom onset were negatively correlated with the relative changes in TWSTRS scores at the last follow-up, while there was a positive correlation with preoperative TWSTRS scores. On the stepwise multivariate regression, only the age at surgery remained significant in the best predictive model.

CONCLUSIONS

GPi-DBS and STN-DBS both provided a common great improvement in the symptoms of CD patients in 3 years. Earlier age at surgery may probably indicate larger improvement. More randomized large-scale clinical trials are warranted in the future.

Binaural Response Properties and Sensitivity to Interaural Difference of Neurons in the Auditory Cortex of the Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus

This study examines binaural response properties and sensitivity to interaural level difference of single neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AC) of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus under earphone stimulation conditions. Contralateral sound stimulation always evoked response from all 306 AC neurons recorded but ipsilateral sound stimulation either excited, inhibited or did not affect their responses. High best frequency (BF) neurons typically had high minimum threshold (MT) and low BF neurons had low MT. However, both BF and MT did not correlate with their recording depth. The BF of these AC neurons progressively changed from high to low along the anteromedial-posterolateral axis of the AC. Their number of impulses and response latency varied with sound level and inter-aural level differences (ILD). Their number of impulses typically increased either monotonically or non-monotonically to a maximum and the latency shortened to a minimum at a specific sound level. Among 205 AC neurons studied at varied ILD, 178 (87%) and 127 (62%) neurons discharged maximally and responded with the shortest response latency at a specific ILD, respectively. Neurons sequentially isolated within an orthogonal electrode puncture shared similar BF, MT, binaurality and ILD curves. However, the response latency of these AC neurons progressively shortened with recording depth. Species-specific difference among this bat, the mustached bat and the pallid bat is discussed in terms of frequency and binaurality representation in the AC.

Latency modulation of collicular neurons induced by electric stimulation of the auditory cortex in Hipposideros pratti: In vivo intracellular recording

In the auditory pathway, the inferior colliculus (IC) receives and integrates excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the lower auditory nuclei, contralateral IC, and auditory cortex (AC), and then uploads these inputs to the thalamus and cortex. Meanwhile, the AC modulates the sound signal processing of IC neurons, including their latency (i.e., first-spike latency). Excitatory and inhibitory corticofugal projections to the IC may shorten and prolong the latency of IC neurons, respectively. However, the synaptic mechanisms underlying the corticofugal latency modulation of IC neurons remain unclear. Thus, this study probed these mechanisms via in vivo intracellular recording and acoustic and focal electric stimulation. The AC latency modulation of IC neurons is possibly mediated by pre-spike depolarization duration, pre-spike hyperpolarization duration, and spike onset time. This study suggests an effective strategy for the timing sequence determination of auditory information uploaded to the thalamus and cortex.

Inter-collicular suppression compresses all types of rate-amplitude functions of inferior collicular neurons in mice

The two inferior colliculi (IC) are paired structures in the midbrain that are connected to each other by a bundle of commissural fibers. The fibers play an important role in coordinating sound signal processing between the two inferior colliculi. This study examined inter-collicular suppression on sound signal processing in amplitude domain of mice by measuring the rate-amplitude functions (RAFs) of neurons in one IC during the electrical stimulation of the opposite IC. Three types (monotonic, saturated and non-monotonic) RAFs of collicular neurons were measured before and during inter-collicular suppression. Inter-collicular suppression significantly increased the slope, decreased the dynamic range and narrowed down the responsive amplitude of all RAFs to high amplitude level but did not change the type of most (36/43, 84 %) RAFs. As a result, all types of RAFs were compressed at a greater degree at low than at high sound amplitude during inter-collicular suppression. These data indicate that inter-collicular suppression improve sound processing in the high amplitude domain.

Left ear advantage in speech-related dichotic listening is not specific to auditory processing disorder in children: A machine-learning fMRI and DTI study

Dichotic listening (DL) tests are among the most frequently included in batteries for the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders (APD) in children. A finding of atypical left ear advantage (LEA) for speech-related stimuli is often taken by clinical audiologists as an indicator for APD. However, the precise etiology of ear advantage in DL tests has been a source of debate for decades. It is uncertain whether a finding of LEA is truly indicative of a sensory processing deficit such as APD, or whether attentional or other supramodal factors may also influence ear advantage. Multivariate machine learning was used on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional MRI (fMRI) data from a cohort of children ages 7–14 referred for APD testing with LEA, and typical controls with right-ear advantage (REA). LEA was predicted by: increased axial diffusivity in the left internal capsule (sublenticular region), and decreased functional activation in the left frontal eye fields (BA 8) during words presented diotically as compared to words presented dichotically, compared to children with right-ear advantage (REA). These results indicate that both sensory and attentional deficits may be predictive of LEA, and thus a finding of LEA, while possibly due to sensory factors, is not a specific indicator of APD as it may stem from a supramodal etiology.

•

Left-ear advantage (LEA) in speech-related dichotic listening tests is atypical.

•

LEA is predicted by differences in functional activation in frontal eye fields.

•

LEA also predicted by differences in WM microstructure in left auditory radiation.

•

LEA is therefore not specific for auditory processing disorder (APD) in children.

Tuning shifts of the auditory system by corticocortical and corticofugal projections and conditioning

The central auditory system consists of the lemniscal and nonlemniscal systems. The thalamic lemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory nuclei are different from each other in response properties and neural connectivities. The cortical auditory areas receiving the projections from these thalamic nuclei interact with each other through corticocortical projections and project down to the subcortical auditory nuclei. This corticofugal (descending) system forms multiple feedback loops with the ascending system. The corticocortical and corticofugal projections modulate auditory signal processing and play an essential role in the plasticity of the auditory system. Focal electric stimulation - comparable to repetitive tonal stimulation - of the lemniscal system evokes three major types of changes in the physiological properties, such as the tuning to specific values of acoustic parameters of cortical and subcortical auditory neurons through different combinations of facilitation and inhibition. For such changes, a neuromodulator, acetylcholine, plays an essential role. Electric stimulation of the nonlemniscal system evokes changes in the lemniscal system that is different from those evoked by the lemniscal stimulation. Auditory signals ascending from the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic nuclei to the cortical auditory areas appear to be selected or adjusted by a "differential" gating mechanism. Conditioning for associative learning and pseudo-conditioning for nonassociative learning respectively elicit tone-specific and nonspecific plastic changes. The lemniscal, corticofugal and cholinergic systems are involved in eliciting the former, but not the latter. The current article reviews the recent progress in the research of corticocortical and corticofugal modulations of the auditory system and its plasticity elicited by conditioning and pseudo-conditioning.

Specific and nonspecific plasticity of the primary auditory cortex elicited by thalamic auditory neurons

The ventral and medial divisions of the medial geniculate body (MGBv and MGBm) respectively are the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic auditory nuclei. Lemniscal neurons are narrowly frequency tuned and provide highly specific frequency information to the primary auditory cortex (AI), whereas nonlemniscal neurons are broadly frequency tuned and project widely to auditory cortical areas including AI. The MGBv and MGBm are presumably different not only in auditory signal processing, but also in eliciting cortical plastic changes. We electrically stimulated MGBv or MGBm neurons and found the following: (1) electric stimulation of narrowly frequency-tuned MGBv neurons evoked the shift of the frequency-tuning curves of AI neurons toward the tuning curves of the stimulated MGBv neurons. This shift was the same as that in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus and AI elicited by focal electric stimulation of AI or auditory fear conditioning. The widths of the tuning curves of the AI neurons stayed the same or slightly increased. (2) Electric stimulation of broad frequency-tuned MGBm neurons augmented the auditory responses of AI neurons and broadened their frequency-tuning curves which did not shift. These cortical changes evoked by MGBv or MGBm neurons slowly disappeared over 45-60 min after the onset of the electric stimulation. Our findings indicate that lemniscal and nonlemniscal nuclei are indeed different in eliciting cortical plastic changes: the MGBv evokes tone-specific plasticity in AI for adjusting auditory signal processing in the frequency domain, whereas the MGBm evokes nonspecific plasticity in AI for increasing the sensitivity of cortical neurons.

Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain

The brain selectively extracts the most relevant information in top-down processing manner. Does the corticofugal system, a "back projection system," constitute the neural basis of such top-down selection? Here, we show how focal activation of the auditory cortex with 500 nA electrical pulses influences the auditory information processing in the cochlear nucleus (CN) that receives almost unprocessed information directly from the ear. We found that cortical activation increased the response magnitudes and shortened response latencies of physiologically matched CN neurons, whereas decreased response magnitudes and lengthened response latencies of unmatched CN neurons. In addition, cortical activation shifted the frequency tunings of unmatched CN neurons toward those of the activated cortical neurons. Our data suggest that cortical activation selectively enhances the neural processing of particular auditory information and attenuates others at the first processing level in the brain based on sound frequencies encoded in the auditory cortex. The auditory cortex apparently implements a long-range feedback mechanism to select or filter incoming signals from the ear.

Modulation of the receptive fields of midbrain neurons elicited by thalamic electrical stimulation through corticofugal feedback

The ascending and descending projections of the central auditory system form multiple tonotopic loops. This study specifically examines the tonotopic pathway from the auditory thalamus to the auditory cortex and then to the auditory midbrain in mice. We observed the changes of receptive fields in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of the midbrain evoked by focal electrical stimulation of the ventral division of the medial geniculate body of the thalamus. The receptive field of an auditory neuron was characterized by five parameters: the best frequency, minimum threshold, bandwidth, size of receptive field, and average spike number. We found that focal thalamic stimulation changed the parametric values characterizing the recorded collicular receptive fields toward those characterizing the stimulated thalamic receptive fields. Cortical inactivation with muscimol prevented the development of the collicular plasticity induced by focal thalamic stimulation. Our data suggest that the intact colliculo-thalamo-cortico-collicular loops are important for the coordination of sound-guided plasticity in the central auditory system.

Corticofugal modulation of multi-parametric auditory selectivity in the midbrain of the big brown bat

Corticofugal modulation of sub-cortical auditory selectivity has been shown previously in mammals for frequency, amplitude, time, and direction domains in separate studies. As such, these studies do not show if multi-parametric corticofugal modulation can be mediated through the same sub-cortical neuron. Here we specifically studied corticofugal modulation of best frequency (BF), best amplitude (BA), and best azimuth (BAZ) at the same neuron in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, using focal electrical stimulation in the auditory cortex. Among 53 corticofugally inhibited collicular neurons examined, cortical electrical stimulation produced a shift of all three measurements (i.e., BF, BA, and BAZ) toward the value of stimulated cortical neuron in 13 (24.5%) neurons, two measurements (i.e., BF and BAZ or BA and BAZ) in 19 (36%) neurons, and one measurement in 16 (30%) neurons. Cortical electrical stimulation did not shift any of these measurements in the remaining five (9.5%) neurons. Corticofugally induced collicular BF shift was symmetrical, whereas the shift in collicular BA or BAZ was asymmetrical. The amount of shift in each measurement was significantly correlated with each measurement difference between recorded collicular and stimulated cortical neurons. However, shifts of three measurements were not correlated with each other. Furthermore, average measurement difference between collicular and cortical neurons was larger for collicular neurons with measurement shifts than for those without shifts. These data indicate that multi-parametric corticofugal modulation can be mediated through the same subcortical neuron based on the difference in auditory selectivity between subcortical and cortical neurons.