Frequency and loss dependence of the protective effects of the olivocochlear pathways in cats

Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools

A series of articles discussing advanced diagnostics that can be used to assess noise injury and associated noise-induced hearing disorders (NIHD) was developed under the umbrella of the United States Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence Pharmaceutical Interventions for Hearing Loss working group. The overarching goals of the current series were to provide insight into (1) well-established and more recently developed metrics that are sensitive for detection of cochlear pathology or diagnosis of NIHD, and (2) the tools that are available for characterizing individual noise hazard as personal exposure will vary based on distance to the sound source and placement of hearing protection devices. In addition to discussing the utility of advanced diagnostics in patient care settings, the current articles discuss the selection of outcomes and end points that can be considered for use in clinical trials investigating hearing loss prevention and hearing rehabilitation.

Synaptic plasticity of inhibitory synapses onto medial olivocochlear efferent neurons

Abstract

The descending auditory system modulates the ascending system at every level. The final descending, or efferent, stage comprises lateral olivocochlear and medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons. MOC somata in the ventral brainstem project axons to the cochlea to synapse onto outer hair cells (OHC), inhibiting OHC‐mediated cochlear amplification. MOC suppression of OHC function is implicated in cochlear gain control with changing sound intensity, detection of salient stimuli, attention and protection against acoustic trauma. Thus, sound excites MOC neurons to provide negative feedback of the cochlea. Sound also inhibits MOC neurons via medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) neurons. However, MNTB–MOC synapses exhibit short‐term depression, suggesting reduced MNTB–MOC inhibition during sustained stimuli. Further, due to high rates of both baseline and sound‐evoked activity in MNTB neurons in vivo, MNTB–MOC synapses may be tonically depressed. To probe this, we characterized short‐term plasticity of MNTB–MOC synapses in mouse brain slices. We mimicked in vivo‐like temperature and extracellular calcium conditions, and in vivo‐like activity patterns of fast synaptic activation rates, sustained activation and prior tonic activity. Synaptic depression was sensitive to extracellular calcium concentration and temperature. During rapid MNTB axon stimulation, postsynaptic currents in MOC neurons summated but with concurrent depression, resulting in smaller, sustained currents, suggesting tonic inhibition of MOC neurons during rapid circuit activity. Low levels of baseline MNTB activity did not significantly reduce responses to subsequent rapid activity that mimics sound stimulation, indicating that, in vivo, MNTB inhibition of MOC neurons persists despite tonic synaptic depression.

Key points

Inhibitory synapses from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) onto medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons exhibit short‐term plasticity that is sensitive to calcium and temperature, with enhanced synaptic depression occurring at higher calcium concentrations and at room temperature.

High rates of background synaptic activity that mimic the upper limits of spontaneous MNTB activity cause tonic synaptic depression of MNTB–MOC synapses that limits further synaptic inhibition.

High rates of activity at MNTB–MOC synapses cause synaptic summation with concurrent depression to yield a response with an initial large amplitude that decays to a tonic inhibition.

Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings

Medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons provide an efferent innervation to outer hair cells (OHCs) of the cochlea, but their tonotopic mapping is incompletely known. In the present study of anesthetized guinea pigs, the MOC mapping was investigated using in vivo, extracellular recording, and labeling at a site along the cochlear course of the axons. The MOC axons enter the cochlea at its base and spiral apically, successively turning out to innervate OHCs according to their characteristic frequencies (CFs). Recordings made at a site in the cochlear basal turn yielded a distribution of MOC CFs with an upper limit, or "edge," due to usually absent higher-CF axons that presumably innervate more basal locations. The CFs at the edge, normalized across preparations, were equal to the CFs of the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) at the recording sites (near 16 kHz). Corresponding anatomical data from extracellular injections showed spiraling MOC axons giving rise to an edge of labeling at the position of a narrow band of labeled ANFs. Overall, the edges of the MOC CFs and labeling, with their correspondences to ANFs, suggest similar tonotopic mappings of these efferent and afferent fibers, at least in the cochlear basal turn. They also suggest that MOC axons miss much of the position of the more basally located cochlear amplifier appropriate for their CF; instead, the MOC innervation may be optimized for protection from damage by acoustic overstimulation.

The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review

Large intersubject variability in the susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is known to occur in both humans and animals. It has been suggested that the olivocochlear system (OCS) plays a significant role in protecting the cochlea from exposure to high levels of noise. A mini literature review about the scientific evidence from animal and human studies about the association between the function of the OCS and susceptibility to NIHL was carried out. Animal data consistently show that de-efferented ears exhibit larger temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) than efferented ears. Data from human studies do not consistently show a correlation between the strength of the OCS function and amount of TTS. Further research on human subjects is required to determine how the OCS function could be used to predict susceptibility to NIHL in individual subjects.

Effect of background noise on neuronal coding of interaural level difference cues in rat inferior colliculus

Humans can accurately localize sounds even in unfavourable signal-to-noise conditions. To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying this, we studied the effect of background wide-band noise on neural sensitivity to variations in interaural level difference (ILD), the predominant cue for sound localization in azimuth for high-frequency sounds, at the characteristic frequency of cells in rat inferior colliculus (IC). Binaural noise at high levels generally resulted in suppression of responses (55.8%), but at lower levels resulted in enhancement (34.8%) as well as suppression (30.3%). When recording conditions permitted, we then examined if any binaural noise effects were related to selective noise effects at each of the two ears, which we interpreted in light of well-known differences in input type (excitation and inhibition) from each ear shaping particular forms of ILD sensitivity in the IC. At high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), in most ILD functions (41%), the effect of background noise appeared to be due to effects on inputs from both ears, while for a large percentage (35.8%) appeared to be accounted for by effects on excitatory input. However, as SNR decreased, change in excitation became the dominant contributor to the change due to binaural background noise (63.6%). These novel findings shed light on the IC neural mechanisms for sound localization in the presence of continuous background noise. They also suggest that some effects of background noise on encoding of sound location reported to be emergent in upstream auditory areas can also be observed at the level of the midbrain.

Stronger efferent suppression of cochlear neural potentials by contralateral acoustic stimulation in awake than in anesthetized chinchilla

There are two types of sensory cells in the mammalian cochlea, inner hair cells, which make synaptic contact with auditory-nerve afferent fibers, and outer hair cells that are innervated by crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent fibers. Contralateral acoustic stimulation activates the uncrossed efferent MOC fibers reducing cochlear neural responses, thus modifying the input to the central auditory system. The chinchilla, among all studied mammals, displays the lowest percentage of uncrossed MOC fibers raising questions about the strength and frequency distribution of the contralateral-sound effect in this species. On the other hand, MOC effects on cochlear sensitivity have been mainly studied in anesthetized animals and since the MOC-neuron activity depends on the level of anesthesia, it is important to assess the influence of anesthesia in the strength of efferent effects. Seven adult chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger) were chronically implanted with round-window electrodes in both cochleae. We compared the effect of contralateral sound in awake and anesthetized condition. Compound action potentials (CAP) and cochlear microphonics (CM) were measured in the ipsilateral cochlea in response to tones in absence and presence of contralateral sound. Control measurements performed after middle-ear muscles section in one animal discarded any possible middle-ear reflex activation. Contralateral sound produced CAP amplitude reductions in all chinchillas, with suppression effects greater by about 1–3 dB in awake than in anesthetized animals. In contrast, CM amplitude increases of up to 1.9 dB were found in only three awake chinchillas. In both conditions the strongest efferent effects were produced by contralateral tones at frequencies equal or close to those of ipsilateral tones. Contralateral CAP suppressions for 1–6 kHz ipsilateral tones corresponded to a span of uncrossed MOC fiber innervation reaching at least the central third of the chinchilla cochlea.

Assessment of the noise-protective action of the olivocochlear efferents in humans

It has been demonstrated in different mammals that the medial olivocochlear efferents (MOC) exert a noise-protective effect on the cochlea. In humans such an effect has not unambiguously been shown as of yet. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between MOC activity and susceptibility of the cochlea to noise-induced hearing loss in humans. In 40 normally hearing human subjects, we measured the following: (1) magnitude of temporary threshold shift (TTS) after exposure to 60 min broadband noise of 94 dB SPL and (2) contralateral suppression (CS) of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (which reflects MOC activity) using two different measurement paradigms. CS was measured in duplicate on 2 measurement days. The relationship between TTS and CS was assessed. Individual TTS in the most affected frequencies (4 > 3 > 8 kHz) ranged from 9 to 28 dB HL, with an average maximum TTS of 18.4 dB HL. The amount of CS ranged between 0.3 and 3 dB. The repeatability of CS, evaluated by Cronbach's α value, ranged from 0.76 (acceptable repeatability) to 0.86 (good repeatability). One of the two different measurement paradigms showed a statistically significant inverse correlation between CS magnitude and amount of TTS, which was hypothesized. This is the first study on the relationship between TTS and CS in humans employing TTS induced under controlled laboratory conditions and two different MOC paradigms. The findings are compatible with the hypothesis that MOC activity is noise protective in humans. Future perspectives include modified CS paradigms, longitudinal cohort studies or efforts to also monitor lateral efferent effects in humans.

Modulation of hair cell efferents

Outer hair cells (OHCs) amplify the sound-evoked motion of the basilar membrane to enhance acoustic sensitivity and frequency selectivity. Medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents inhibit OHCs to reduce the sound-evoked response of cochlear afferent neurons. OHC inhibition occurs through the activation of postsynaptic α9α10 nicotinic receptors tightly coupled to calcium-dependent SK2 channels that hyperpolarize the hair cell. MOC neurons are cholinergic but a number of other neurotransmitters and neuromodulators have been proposed to participate in efferent transmission, with emerging evidence for both pre- and postsynaptic effects. Cochlear inhibition in vivo is maximized by repetitive activation of the efferents, reflecting facilitation and summation of transmitter release onto outer hair cells. This review summarizes recent studies on cellular and molecular mechanisms of cholinergic inhibition and the regulation of those molecular components, in particular the involvement of intracellular calcium. Facilitation at the efferent synapse is compared in a variety of animals, as well as other possible mechanisms of modulation of ACh release. These results suggest that short-term plasticity contributes to effective cholinergic inhibition of hair cells.

Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength

The cochlea can be protected from acoustic trauma by moderate-level sound exposure. It is suggested that olivocochlear system may play a significant role in this protection. This study was performed to investigate distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes changes and the efficiency of contralateral noise stimulation on DPOAE after conditioning noise exposure. Our results demonstrate that long-term conditioning can increase the DPOAE amplitudes at low frequencies (1.0-3.0 kHz) and decrease the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength at the same frequencies. The DPOAE amplitudes are partially restored to the preconditioning levels 2 weeks after conditioning; contralateral suppression also returns to the preconditioning levels. These results suggest that the enhancement of DPOAE amplitudes might be due to a decrease in olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.

Bandwidth dependency of cochlear centrifugal pathways in modulating hearing desensitization caused by loud sound

Centrifugal olivocochlear (OC) pathways modulate cochlear hearing desensitization induced by loud sounds, but there is a null point, determined by sound bandwidth, for this effect. In a previous study, using loud sounds from the region of greatest hearing sensitivity in cats, OC pathways did not affect desensitization induced by 2-kHz wide noise, but did to narrower bandwidth (tones) or broader bandwidth (3.5 kHz-wide or 5 kHz-wide noise) trauma from the same cochlear region. The bandwidth null-point effect occurred in three very different conditions in which OC pathways modulated losses to narrower or broader bandwidth traumata, confirming the robustness of this phenomenon, and was also true for sub-component OC pathways: neither crossed nor uncrossed OC pathways individually modulated desensitization to that 2 kHz-wide noise. The medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) that is most likely to have modulated desensitization in that study, varies in its cochlear distribution; in cats, densest innervation is in the region of greatest hearing sensitivity and the decrease away from that region means MOCS effects there may not translate to other regions. This hypothesis was now tested in lower- (around 4 kHz) and higher- (around 18 kHz) frequency cochlear regions. Across this fairly large cochlear swath, no OC modulation of desensitization occurred to 2-kHz-wide bandwidth sounds, but did to broader bandwidth; thus the bandwidth dependency was constant across this swath. However, when OC effects did occur, the pattern of effects of OC sub-components could be idiosyncratic to sound bandwidth and cochlear region even for similar net OC effects.

Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips

Activity of the medial olivocochlear efferents can be inferred by measuring the change of the level of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) during ipsilateral or contralateral acoustic stimulation, the so-called medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR). A limitation of this measurement strategy, however, is the distinct variability of MOCR values depending on DPOAE primary tone levels and frequency, which makes selection of the stimulus parameters difficult. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dependence of MOCR values on DPOAE fine structure in humans. MOCR during contralateral acoustic stimulation was measured at frequencies with distinct non-monotonicity ("dip") in the DPOAE fine structure, and in frequencies with flat fine structure. One hundred and twenty one different primary tone level combinations were used (L(1)=50-60dB SPL, L(2)=35-45dB SPL, 1dB steps). The measurement was repeated on another day. The major findings were: (1) Largest MOCR effects can be found in frequencies which exhibit a distinct dip in DPOAE fine structure. (2) Primary tone levels have a critical influence on the magnitude of the MOCR effect. MOCR changes of up to 23dB following a L(1) change of only 1dB were observed. Averages of the maximum MOCR change per 1dB step were in the 3-5dB-range. Both findings can be interpreted in the light of the DPOAE two-generator model [Heitmann, J., Waldmann, B., Schnitzler, H.U., Plinkert, P.K., Zenner, H.P. 1998. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1-f2 removes DP-gram fine structure - evidence for a secondary generator. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, 1527-1531]. According to the present results we propose, that assessing MOCR specifically at frequencies with a distinct dip in the DPOAE fine structure, in combination with fine variation of the stimulus tone levels, allows for a more targeted search for maximum MOCR effects. Future studies must show if this approach can contribute to the further clarification of the physiological roles of the olivocochlear efferents.

Bandwidth determines modulatory effects of centrifugal pathways on cochlear hearing desensitization caused by loud sound

Centrifugal olivocochlear (OC) pathways modulate cochlear hearing losses induced in cats by loud sounds varying in bandwidth from tones to clicks and noise bands, in a variety of conditions. The general effect, always to reduce hearing damage, can be a net effect resulting from complex interactions between OC subcomponents (crossed and uncrossed OC pathways). The interactions between these subcomponents vary with type of loud sound, suggesting that sound bandwidth may be important in determining how OC pathways modulate loud sound-induced hearing loss. This dependency was examined and here it is reported that OC pathways do not alter cochlear hearing losses caused by loud noise with a 2-kHz-wide bandwidth intermediate between the loud sounds of previous studies. Increasing stimulus bandwidth even slightly more, to use a loud 3.5-kHz-wide bandwidth noise as the damaging sound, once again revealed OC modulation of cochlear hearing loss. The fact that OC pathways do not modulate cochlear hearing losses induced by loud 2-kHz-wide noise was demonstrated in three very different test conditions in which OC pathways modulate hearing losses caused by narrower or broader bandwidth sounds. This confirmed that the absence of centrifugal modulation of hearing loss to this particular sound was a robust phenomenon not related to test condition. The absence of overall centrifugal effects was also true at the level of subcomponent pathways; neither crossed nor uncrossed OC pathways individually modulated cochlear hearing losses to the loud 2-kHz-wide noise. This surprising frequency dependency has general implications for centrifugal modulation of cochlear responses.

Comparative gene expression analysis reveals a characteristic molecular profile of the superior olivary complex

The superior olivary complex (SOC) is a very conspicuous structure in the mammalian auditory brainstem. It represents the first binaural processing center and is important for sound localization in the azimuth and in feedback regulation of cochlear function. In order to define molecular determinants of the SOC, which are of potential functional relevance, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of its transcriptome by serial analysis of gene expression in adult rats. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of the SOC's gene expression profile compared to that of two other neural tissues, the striatum and the hippocampus, and with extraocular muscle tissue. This tested the hypothesis that SOC-specific or significantly upregulated transcripts provide candidates for the specific function of auditory neurons. Thirty-three genes were significantly upregulated in the SOC when compared to the two other neural tissues. Thirteen encoded proteins involved in neurotransmission, including action potential propagation, exocytosis, and myelination; five genes are important for the energy metabolism, and five transcripts are unknown or poorly characterized and have yet to be described in the nervous system. The comparison of functional gene classes indicates that the SOC has the highest energy demand of the three neural tissues, yet protein turnover is apparently not increased. This suggests a high energy demand for fueling auditory neurotransmission. Such a demand may have implications on auditory-specific tasks and relate to central auditory processing disorders. Ultimately, these data provide new avenues to foster investigations of auditory function and to advance molecular physiology in the central auditory system.

Contextual modulation of cochlear hearing desensitization depends on the type of loud sound trauma

In ears in which cochlear efferent pathways were cut and with testing done under anaesthetic conditions that preclude middle ear muscle activity (so as to examine the "intrinsic" effects of loud sound on the cochlea without any confounding effect of efferent pathways to the auditory periphery), atraumatic background white noise (WN) increases cochlear hearing loss (temporary threshold shifts, TTSs) induced by a traumatic pure tone but reduces TTSs caused by traumatic 5-kHz wide narrow band (NB) sound. The short-duration moderately intense traumata used in these studies most likely cause TTSs by affecting cochlear mechanics and these WN modulatory effects, exerted directly on the cochlea's intrinsic susceptibility to TTSs, are not predicted by any current description of cochlear mechanics. Here it is demonstrated that background WN reduces trauma-induced TTSs with even a relatively small increase in trauma bandwidth beyond that of a pure tone, discounting the alternative that contextual modulatory effects transition systematically along a continuum as trauma bandwidth increases from a pure tone to a broader bandwidth (albeit 2 kHz-wide NB) trauma. These results have implications for cochlear mechanics as the TTSs due to the traumatic sound of this study are most likely due to changes in cochlear mechanics but are not easily explained by what is currently known of cochlear mechanics.

Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Animal studies (guinea pig, cat, chinchilla) have shown that activity of the medial olivocochlear efferents can exert noise-protective effects on the cochlea. It is not yet known whether such effects are also existent in humans. Olivocochlear activity can be estimated indirectly by contralateral suppression (CS) of otoacoustic emissions (OAE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We measured Input/Output functions of distortion products of OAE (DPOAE), with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation by white noise, in 94 normal hearing young male subjects. Seven stimuli with L2 between 20 and 60 dB SPL and L1 = 39 dB + 0.4 L2 ("scissor paradigm") were used at f2 = 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kHz. The measurement was repeated 2 weeks later. In 83 subjects of the same group, pure tone audiometry was registered before and 6 minutes after shooting exercises to evaluate individual susceptibility to develop a temporary threshold shift (TTS).

RESULTS

Test-retest repeatability of CS was generally good. CS averaged 0.98 dB SPL (SD 1.19 dB, median 0.56 dB). As expected, CS was greatest at low stimulus levels (median 1.06 dB at L2 = 20 dB, as compared with 0.33 dB at L2 = 60 dB). The smallest average CS was found at 4 kHz, and the greatest CS appeared at 2 kHz. A TTS occurred in 7 of 83 (8.5%) subjects. Statistical analysis did not reveal any correlation between the amount of CS and individual TTS susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

1) Measurement of CS of DPOAE using an extensive measurement paradigm revealed good test-retest repeatability, confirming the reliability of this audiologic tool. 2) CS of DPOAE does not predict individual susceptibility to mild TTS induced by impulse noise in humans. Possible explanations for the missing association are discussed. Future perspectives include longitudinal studies to further elucidate the association between medial olivocochlear bundle-activity and permanent threshold shift in humans. The goal is to develop a diagnostic tool for the prediction of individual noise vulnerability in humans, thereby preventing noise-induced hearing loss.

Catecholaminergic innervation of guinea pig superior olivary complex

In mammals, olivocochlear neurons in the superior olivary complex project to the cochlea, providing input to outer hair cells and auditory afferents contacting inner hair cells. In the rat it has been demonstrated that olivocochlear neurons receive noradrenergic input, arising from the locus coeruleus and it has been demonstrated in this species using in vitro brain slices that noradrenaline exerts a direct, mostly excitatory effect on an olivocochlear subpopulation. The guinea pig is a more commonly used animal in auditory physiology than the rat and anatomical data on noradrenaline in the auditory brainstem in this species are lacking. Because it has been shown that a compact locus coeruleus is not present in the guinea pig, subtle species differences might be expected. Therefore, using immunohistochemical and tracing techniques we have investigated in the guinea pig (1) the noradrenergic and dopaminergic innervation of the superior olivary complex, (2) the anatomical relationship between noradrenergic fibres and olivocochlear neurons and (3) the origin of the noradrenergic input to this brainstem region. The results show that the guinea pig superior olivary complex receives moderately dense noradrenergic innervation and no dopaminergic innervation. In addition, noradrenergic fibres and varicosities were observed in close contact with both somata and dendrites of olivocochlear neurons, strongly suggestive of synaptic contacts. Finally the results show that a significant component of the noradrenergic innervation of the guinea pig superior olivary complex arises in the locus subcoeruleus, which is a structure likely to be the homologue of the locus coeruleus in rats and other species.

Medial olivocochlear reflex interneurons are located in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus: a kainic acid lesion study in guinea pigs

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex arc is probably a three-neuron pathway consisting of type I spiral ganglion neurons, reflex interneurons in the cochlear nucleus, and MOC neurons that project to the outer hair cells of the cochlea. We investigated the identity of MOC reflex interneurons in the cochlear nucleus by assaying their regional distribution using focal injections of kainic acid. Our reflex metric was the amount of change in the distortion product otoacoustic emission (at 2f(1)-f(2)) just after onset of the primary tones. This metric for MOC reflex strength has been shown to depend on an intact reflex pathway. Lesions involving the posteroventral cochlear nucleus (PVCN), but not the other subdivisions, produced long-term decreases in MOC reflex strength. The degree of cell loss within the dorsal part of the PVCN was a predictor of whether the lesion affected MOC reflex strength. We suggest that multipolar cells within the PVCN have the distribution and response characteristics appropriate to be the MOC reflex interneurons.

Contextual modulation of olivocochlear pathway effects on loud sound-induced cochlear hearing desensitization

This study shows that the cochlear hearing losses [temporary threshold shifts (TTSs)] induced by traumatic sound and the effect of olivocochlear (OC) pathways to the cochlea on these hearing losses depend on the context of the sound. Background atraumatic white noise (WN) has been shown to 1) exacerbate loud-pure-tone-induced TTSs, and 2) promote the modulation of TTSs by the uncrossed OC (UOC) pathways additional to the action on TTSs, elicited by binaural loud tones themselves, by the crossed OC (COC) pathway. Here the same atraumatic WN reduced TTSs caused by loud narrow band sound. It also reduced TTS modulation by OC pathways. The UOC no longer exerted any effects on TTSs, and COC effects were significantly reduced in two discrete frequency bands: low frequencies within the narrow band ("within-band" frequencies) and high frequencies outside the band ("high-side" frequencies). COC effects were unchanged at high frequencies within the band. Despite these reductions in OC effects, because the WN itself reduced TTSs, the total effect of OC pathways and background WN now produced larger TTS reductions, especially at higher frequencies. Thus the modulatory effects of the OC pathways on TTSs depend on how background WN modulates cochlear state. It is postulated that the WN background and the OC pathways both modulate TTSs by acting on the outer hair cells, in a way that promotes the reduction of TTSs caused by the narrow band sound trauma. This joint promotion of a protective end-effect on TTSs to narrow band sound trauma contrasts against the effects seen with pure tone trauma where the same background WN exacerbated TTSs at high-side frequencies.

Disruption of lateral olivocochlear neurons via a dopaminergic neurotoxin depresses sound-evoked auditory nerve activity

We applied the dopaminergic (DA) neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) to the guinea pig cochlear perilymph. Immunolabeling of lateral olivocochlear (LOC) neurons using antibodies against synaptophysin was reduced after the MPTP treatment. In contrast, labeling of the medial olivocochlear innervation remained intact. As after brainstem lesions of the lateral superior olive (LSO), the site of origin of the LOC neurons, the main effect of disrupting LOC innervation of the cochlea via MPTP was a depression of the amplitude of the compound action potential (CAP). CAP amplitude depression was similar to that produced by LSO lesions. Latency of the N1 component of the CAP, and distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude and adaptation were unchanged by the MPTP treatment. This technique for selectively lesioning descending LOC efferents provides a new opportunity for examining LOC modulation of afferent activity and behavioral measures of perception.

Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system is an important component of an active mechanical outer hair cell system in mammals. An extensive neurophysiological literature demonstrates that the MOC system attenuates the response of the cochlea to sound by reducing the gain of the outer hair cell mechanical response to stimulation. Despite a growing understanding of MOC physiology, the biological role of the MOC system in mammalian audition remains uncertain. Some evidence suggests that the MOC system functions in a protective role by acting to reduce receptor damage during intense acoustic exposure. For the MOC system to have evolved as a protective mechanism, however, the inner ears of mammals must be exposed to potentially damaging sources of noise that can elicit MOC-mediated protective effects under natural conditions. In this review, we evaluate the possibility that the MOC system evolved to protect the inner ear from naturally occurring environmental noise. Our survey of nonanthropogenic noise levels shows that while sustained sources of broadband noise are found in nearly all natural acoustic environments, frequency-averaged ambient noise levels in these environments rarely exceed 70 dB SPL. Similarly, sources reporting ambient noise spectra in natural acoustic environments suggest that noise levels within narrow frequency bands are typically low in intensity (<40 dB SPL). Only in rare instances (e.g., during frog choruses) are ambient noise levels sustained at moderately high intensities (~70-90 dB SPL). By contrast, all experiments in which an MOC-mediated protective effect was demonstrated used much higher sound intensities to traumatize the cochlea (100-150 dB SPL). This substantial difference between natural ambient noise levels and the experimental conditions necessary to evoke MOC-mediated protection suggests that even the noisiest natural acoustic environments are not sufficiently intense to have selected for the evolution of the MOC system as a protective mechanism. Furthermore, although relatively intense noise environments do exist in nature, they are insufficiently distributed to account for the widespread distribution of the MOC system in mammals. The paucity of high-intensity noise and the near ubiquity of low-level noise in natural environments supports the hypothesis that the MOC system evolved as a mechanism for "unmasking" biologically significant acoustic stimuli by reducing the response of the cochlea to simultaneous low-level noise. This suggested role enjoys widespread experimental support.

Effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency narrow-band noise on temporary threshold shift in humans

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency (250 Hz) narrow-band noise (NBN) on the temporary threshold shift (TTS) induced by a 2 kHz tone in young normally hearing subjects with a functioning auditory efferent system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen young volunteers served as subjects. All the subjects were young (20-30 years), disease-free and had a medical history negative for otological disease, noise exposure and use of ototoxic drugs. They had normal hearing [thresholds of 125-8,000 Hz below 20 dB hearing level (HL)], transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three different groups. Subjects in Group A (n = 5) were exposed to a 90 dB HL 2 kHz pure tone for 10 min. Subjects in Group B (n = 6) were exposed to a 90 dB HL 2 kHz pure tone and an ipsilateral 45 dB HL 250 Hz NBN for 10 min. Subjects in Group C (n = 5) were exposed to a 90 dB HL 2 kHz pure tone and a contralateral 45 dB HL 250 Hz NBN for 10 min. The right ear served as the test ear. The TTS 2 min after the end of the exposure (TTS2) was measured in all subjects at 2, 3 and 4 kHz.

RESULTS

TTS, in Group A was significantly higher at 3 kHz (p = 0.011) and at 4 kHz (p = 0.003) than TTS2 in Group B. At 4 kHz, TTS2 in Group C was significantly higher (p = 0.013) than TTS2 in Group B. Although TTS2 in Group C was lower than TTS2 in Group A, this difference was not significant. The presence of an ipsilateral low-frequency NBN significantly reduced TTS2 induced by a 90 dB HL 2 kHz tone. A contralateral low-frequency NBN reduced TTS2 in this group of subjects; however, the reduction was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that an ipsilateral low-intensity, low-frequency (250 Hz) NBN can give protection from a TTS induced by a 2 kHz tone. Contralateral low-frequency NBN did not induce any protective effect.

Cochlear outer-hair-cell efferents and complex-sound-induced hearing loss: protective and opposing effects

Centrifugal crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear systems (CMOCS and UMOCS) terminate on cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) and exercise effects through a nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Hence their cochlear effects have not been differentiated. Recent work on protection from loud-sound-induced temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in hearing sensitivity suggest the two OHC efferent systems may act differently. This was tested, using traumatic complex sound, to determine if such sound could activate both MOCS components and then reveal whether they exerted different effects on TTSs to such stimuli. Traumatic noise bands activated crossed and uncrossed MOCS efferents. Two different CMOCS effects were observed. For frequencies in the noise (within-band frequencies), it protected hearing sensitivity as expected. Novel findings were that at frequencies higher than the noise band range (high-side frequencies), it acted to worsen hearing sensitivity and that this was opposed by a UMOCS effect generally targeted to these frequency regions. It is proposed that the two crossed MOCS actions are extensions of a contrast-enhancement action for low-level noise bands. It is also proposed that the UMOCS plays a state-restoration role to prevent an undesired CMOCS side-effect of exacerbation of high-side TTSs to high-level noise bands.

Response adaptation of medial olivocochlear neurons is minimal

Response adaptation is a general characteristic of neurons. A number of studies have investigated the adaptation characteristics of auditory-nerve fibers, which send information to the brain about sound stimuli. However, there have been no previous adaptation studies of olivocochlear neurons, which provide efferent fibers to hair cells and auditory nerve dendrites in the auditory periphery. To study adaptation in efferent fibers, responses of single olivocochlear neurons were recorded to characteristic-frequency tones and noise, using anesthetized guinea pigs. To measure short-term adaptation, stimuli of 500 ms duration were presented, and the responses were displayed as peristimulus time histograms. These histograms showed regular peaks, indicating a "chopping" pattern of response. The rate during each chopping period as well as the general trend of the histogram could be well fit by an equation that expresses the firing rate as a sum of 1) a short-term adaptive rate that decays exponentially with time and 2) a constant steady-state rate. For the adaptation in medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, the average exponential time constant was 47 ms, which is roughly similar to that for short-term adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers. The amount of adaptation (expressed as a percentage decrease of onset firing rate), however, was substantially less in MOC neurons (average 31%) than in auditory-nerve fibers (average 63%). To test for adaptation over longer periods, we used noise and tones of 10 s duration. After the short-term adaptation, the responses of MOC neurons were almost completely sustained (average long-term adaptation 3%). However, in the same preparations, significant long-term adaptation was present in auditory-nerve fibers. These results indicate that the MOC response adaptation is minimal compared with that of auditory-nerve fibers. Such sustained responses may enable the MOC system to produce sustained effects in the periphery, supporting a role for this efferent system during ongoing stimuli of long duration.

Noise priming and the effects of different cochlear centrifugal pathways on loud-sound-induced hearing loss

Priming/conditioning the cochlea with moderately loud sound can reduce damage caused by subsequent loud sound. This study examined immediate effects of short-term priming with monaural broadband noise on temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in hearing caused by a subsequent loud high-frequency tone and the role of centrifugal olivocochlear pathways. Priming caused delay-dependent changes in tone-induced TTSs, particularly or only at frequencies higher than the peak tone-affected frequency, through two general effects: a short-lasting increase in cochlear susceptibility to loud sound and longer-lasting complex end effects of centrifugal pathways. The results indicated the following points. Priming noise had "pure" cochlear effects, outlasting its presentation and declining with delay, that exacerbated tone-induced TTSs at frequencies higher than the peak tone-affected frequency. The centrifugal uncrossed medial olivocochlear system (UMOCS) could prevent this noise exacerbation and as this noise effect declined, could even reduce tone-induced TTSs below those to the unprimed tone. For longer delays, when priming noise no longer had any exacerbative "pure" cochlear effects on TTSs, UMOCS exacerbated TTSs above those to the unprimed tone. The crossed medial olivocochlear system (CMOCS) appeared to show a gradual "build-up" of effects postpriming. A parallel study showed it exercised no end effect on TTSs when noise and tone were concurrent. With priming, CMOCS effects were observed. For the shortest priming delay, the CMOCS blocked a UMOCS effect preventing noise exacerbation of tone-induced TTSs. For longer delays, CMOCS end effects, when present, reduced tone-induced TTSs below those to the unprimed tone. The CMOCS may oscillate between producing these effects and exerting no end-effect. With increasing delay CMOCS protection occurred in a greater proportion of animals. Finally, with a delay of 600 s between primer and loud tone, all these systems appeared to have reset to normal so that TTSs were similar to those in the unprimed condition. Thus the effects of short-term priming are not simple and do not suggest that centrifugal pathways act automatically as a protective system during such priming.

Unilateral hearing losses alter loud sound-induced temporary threshold shifts and efferent effects in the normal-hearing ear

In animals with bilaterally normal hearing, olivocochlear pathways can protect the cochlea from the temporary shifts in hearing sensitivity (temporary threshold shifts; TTSs) caused by short-duration intense loud sounds. The crossed olivocochlear pathway provides protection during binaural loud sound, and uncrossed pathways protect when monaural or binaural loud sounds occur in noise backgrounds. Here I demonstrate that when there is a chronic unilateral hearing loss, effects of loud sounds, and efferent effects on loud sound, in the normal-hearing ear differ markedly from normal. Three categories of test animals with unilateral hearing loss were tested for effects at the normal-hearing ear. In all categories a monaural loud tone to the normal-hearing ear produced lower-than-normal TTSs, apparently because of a tonic re-setting of that ear's susceptibility to loud sound. Second, in the two test categories in which the hearing-loss ear was only partly damaged, binaural loud sound exacerbated TTSs in the normal-hearing ear because it caused threshold shifts that were a combination of "pure" TTSs and uncrossed efferent suppression of cochlear sensitivity. (In normal cats, this binaural tone results in crossed olivocochlear protection that reduces TTS.) Binaural loud sound did not produce such uncrossed efferent effects in the test category in which the nontest ear had suffered total hearing loss, suggesting that this uncrossed efferent effect required binaural input to the CNS. It is noteworthy that, in the absence of this uncrossed efferent suppression, the pure loud sound-alone induced TTSs after binaural exposure were low. Thus in the absence of any efferent effect, the normal-hearing cochlea had a reduced susceptibility to loud tone-induced damage. Finally, the results suggest that, with respect to cochlear actions at high sound levels, uncrossed and crossed efferent pathways may exert different effects at the one type of receptor cell.

Centrifugal pathways protect hearing sensitivity at the cochlea in noisy environments that exacerbate the damage induced by loud sound

Loud sounds damage the cochlea, the auditory receptor organ, reducing hearing sensitivity. Previous studies demonstrate that the centrifugal olivocochlear pathways can moderately reduce these temporary threshold shifts (TTSs), protecting the cochlea. This effect involves only the olivocochlear pathway component known as the crossed medial olivocochlear system pathway, originating from the contralateral brainstem and terminating on outer hair cells in the cochlea. Here I demonstrate that even moderate noise backgrounds can significantly exacerbate the cochlear TTSs induced by loud tones, but this is prevented because in such conditions there is additional activation of uncrossed olivocochlear pathways, enhancing protection of cochlear hearing sensitivity. Activation of the uncrossed pathways differs from that of the crossed pathway in that it is achieved only in noise backgrounds but can then be obtained under monaural conditions of loud tone and background noise. In contrast, activation of the crossed pathway is achieved only by binaural loud tones and is not further enhanced by background noise. Thus, conjoint activation of both crossed and uncrossed efferent pathways can occur in noise backgrounds to powerfully protect the cochlea under conditions similar to those encountered naturally by humans.

Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength

Permanent noise-induced damage to the inner ear is a major cause of hearing impairment, arising from exposures occurring during both work- and pleasure-related activities. Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss is highly variable: some have tough, whereas others have tender ears. This report documents, in an animal model, the efficacy of a simple nontraumatic assay of normal ear function in predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury. The assay measures the strength of a sound-evoked neuronal feedback pathway to the inner ear, the olivocochlear efferents, by examining otoacoustic emissions created by the normal ear, which can be measured with a microphone in the external ear. Reflex strength was inversely correlated with the degree of hearing loss after subsequent noise exposure. These data suggest that one function of the olivocochlear efferent system is to protect the ear from acoustic injury. This assay, or a simple modification of it, could be applied to human populations to screen for individuals most at risk in noisy environments.

Cochlear de-efferentation and impulse noise-induced acoustic trauma in the chinchilla

The olivocochlear bundle (OCB) has been shown to protect the ear from acoustic trauma induced by continuous noise or tones. The present study examines the OCB's role in the ear's response to impulse noise (150 dB pSPL, 100 impulses, 50 s total exposure duration). Successful section of the OCB was achieved through a posterior parafloccular fossa approach for the right ears of six out of 15 adult chinchillas. The left ears from the same animals served as efferent-innervated controls. Measurements of inferior colliculus evoked potentials (ICPs) showed that the de-efferented ears incurred similar temporary and permanent threshold shifts as the control ears. Twenty days after noise exposure, depressed ICP amplitudes had virtually recovered to pre-values in the control ears whereas those in the de-efferented ears remained significantly depressed. Greater loss of inner hair cells was seen in the de-efferented ears than in the control ears. Both control and de-efferented ears incurred large loss of outer hair cells, with no statistically significant differences between groups. The current data are intriguing, yielding tentative evidence to suggest that inner hair cells of de-efferented ears are more susceptible to impulse noise than those in efferented control ears. In contrast, outer hair cell vulnerability to impulse noise appears to be unaffected by de-efferentation.

Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. I. Binaural facilitation of responses to high-level noise

Single medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons were recorded from the cochlea of the anesthetized guinea pig. We used tones and noise presented monaurally and binaurally and measured responses for sounds up to 105 dB sound pressure level (SPL). For monaural sound, MOC neuron firing rates were usually higher for noise bursts than tone bursts, a situation not observed for afferent fibers of the auditory nerve that were sampled in the same preparations. MOC neurons also differed from afferent fibers in having less saturation of response. Some MOC neurons had responses that continued to increase even at high sound levels. Differences between MOC and afferent responses suggest that there is convergence in the pathway to olivocochlear neurons, possibly a combination of inputs that are at the characteristic frequency (CF) with others that are off the CF. Opposite-ear noise almost always facilitated the responses of MOC neurons to sounds in the main ear, the ear that best drives the unit. This binaural facilitation depends on several characteristics that pertain to the main ear: it is higher in neurons having a contralateral main ear (contra units), it is higher at main-ear sound levels that are moderate (approximately 65 dB SPL), and it is higher in neurons with low discharge rates to main-ear stimuli. Facilitation also depends on parameters of the opposite-ear sound: facilitation increases with noise level in the opposite ear until saturating, is greater for continuous noise than noise bursts, and is usually greater for noise than for tones. Using optimal opposite-ear facilitators and high-level stimuli, the firing rates of olivocochlear neurons range up to 140 spikes/s, whereas for moderate-level monaural stimuli the rates are <80 spikes/s. At high sound levels, firing rates of olivocochlear neurons increase with CF, an increase that may compensate for the known lower effectiveness of olivocochlear synapses on outer hair cells responding to high frequencies. Overall, our results demonstrate a high MOC response for binaural noise and suggest a prominent role for the MOC system in environments containing binaural noise of high level.

Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plasticity due to noise conditioning

Previous studies have shown that daily, moderate-level sound exposure, or conditioning, can reduce injury from a subsequent high-level noise exposure. We tested the hypothesis that this conditioning produces an increased activity in the olivocochlear efferent reflex, a reflex known to provide protection to the cochlea. Guinea pigs were conditioned by a 10-day intermittent exposure to 2-4 kHz noise at 85 dB sound pressure level. This conditioning is known to reduce damage from a subsequent high-level exposure to the same noise band. Responses to monaural and binaural sound were recorded from single medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neurons, and data from conditioned animals were compared with those obtained from unexposed controls. MOC neurons were classified by their response to noise bursts in the ipsilateral or contralateral ears as ipsi units, contra units, or either-ear units. There were no significant differences in the distributions of these unit types between control and conditioned animals. There were also no differences in other responses to monaural stimuli, including the distribution of characteristic frequencies (CFs), the sharpness of tuning, or thresholds at the CF. For binaural sound at high levels, particularly relevant to sound-evoked activation of the MOC reflex during acoustic overstimulation, the firing rates of MOC neurons with CFs just above the conditioning band showed slight (but statistically significant) elevations relative to control animals. Frequency regions just above the conditioning band also demonstrated maximum conditioning-related protection; thus protection could be due, in part, to long-term changes in MOC discharge rates. For binaural sound at low levels, MOC firing rates in conditioned animals also were increased significantly relative to controls. Again, increases were largest for neurons with CFs just above the conditioning band. For equivalent monaural sound, rates were not significantly increased; thus, conditioning appears to increase binaural facilitation by opposite-ear sound. These data indicate that MOC neurons show long-term plasticity in acoustic responsiveness that is dependent on their acoustic history.

Efferent-mediated protection of the cochlear base from acoustic overexposure by low doses of lithium

Many studies on anaesthetized animals and a few on awake animals have suggested that the cholinergic olivocochlear efferent feedback to outer hair cells can participate in the protection of the cochlea from acoustic overexposure. Lithium is known to stimulate acetylcholine synthesis and release in the brain and it is likely to act similarly at the level of the cochlear efferent synapses. We demonstrate here that, in the awake guinea-pig with a chronically implanted electrode on the round window of the cochlea, the temporary threshold shift induced by 1 minute exposure to different pure tones at around 90 dB sound pressure level (SPL) was reduced by as much as 40 dB, when exposure occurred after lithium treatment. The protection effect was not observed in anaesthetized animals. The effect was seen across the test frequency range of 6.4-12.5 kHz, suggesting that both 'fast' and 'slow' efferent effects are likely to be mediated by acetylcholine. Together our results provide new evidence that the olivocochlear efferents can provide a more efficient protection from acoustic overexposure when animals are awake.

The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma

The role of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) in modulating noise-induced permanent injury to the auditory periphery was studied by completely sectioning the OCB fibers in chinchillas and exposing the animals while awake to a broad-band noise at 105 dB SPL for 6 h. Outer hair cell (OHC) function was assessed by measuring 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) at frequencies from 1.2 to 9.6 kHz and cochlear microphonics (CM) at frequencies from 1 to 8 kHz. As a result of de-efferentation, the CM was decreased but the DPOAEs were unchanged in de-efferented ears as compared with efferented control and sham-operated ears. Following noise exposure, the ears that were de-efferented showed significantly more depression of DPOAE input/output functions and greater decrement of CM amplitude. The differences between de-efferented and efferent-innervated ears were evident across all the frequencies. The cochlear lesions of the OHCs reflected by traditional cytocochleograms, however, were minimal in both efferented and de-efferented ears. The results indicate that cochlear de-efferentation decreases the CM in chinchilla and increases the ear's susceptibility to noise-induced permanent hearing damage. More importantly, de-efferentation increases susceptibility at low frequencies as well as high frequencies.

The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss

Previous work has shown that the cochlear efferent system may play a role in protecting the ear from noise-induced temporary threshold shifts (TTS) following exposures to a single tone or series of moderate-level noises ('toughening'). However, whether the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) is important in decreasing noise-induced permanent threshold shifts (PTS) remains an open question. The importance of the OCB in decreasing the ear's susceptibility to noise, as reflected by 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions, was assessed by sectioning both the ipsilateral and contralateral divisions of the efferent system and exposing chinchillas while awake to an octave band noise (4 kHz) at a low level (85 dB SPL) for 10 days (6 h/day) and then at a high level (95 dB SPL) for 48 h. Complete de-efferentation was verified by cochlear acetylcholinesterase staining. The ears that were de-efferent showed substantially more TTS, greater PTS and larger cochlear lesions of outer hair cells. The results suggest that the efferent system may influence the ear's ability to develop resistance to noise trauma.