Adalimumab Treatment in Biologically Naïve Crohn's Disease: Relationship with Ectopic MUC5AC Expression and Endoscopic Improvement

Real-world efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents are important for managing refractory intestinal Behçet's disease. Few studies have reported the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease due to its rarity.

AIMS

The aim was to examine the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies for intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of medical records at 4 hospitals in Japan. Global gastrointestinal symptom and endoscopic assessment scores were analyzed in intestinal Behçet's disease patients given anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents at 3 and 12 months after the start of therapy.

RESULTS

Of 53 intestinal Behçet's disease patients, 22 received anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody treatment. At the first line, 14 were given adalimumab, and 8 were given infliximab. After 3 and 12 months of treatment, 7 and 11 patients showed complete response of gastrointestinal symptom scores, respectively, and 5 and 9 showed complete remission of the endoscopic assessment score, respectively. Three patients switched anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents.

CONCLUSION

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies are effective for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease in real-world situations. Switching anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents may be useful for failure of first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in some refractory cases.

Adalimumab Dose-Escalation Therapy Is Effective in Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients with Loss of Response to Adalimumab, Especially in Cases without Previous Infliximab Treatment

Background/Aims

Adalimumab dose escalation is one of the most important options in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, since there are few reports of adalimumab dose escalation, especially in East Asia.

Methods

The clinical response to adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab was evaluated retrospectively, using the Crohn's disease activity index score, serum C-reactive protein levels, and endoscopic analyses.

Results

Of the 203 Crohn's disease patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor, 14 refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab received adalimumab dose-escalation therapy. The C-reactive protein level was significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in the whole group, although there were no significant reductions of Crohn's disease activity index scores. Both Crohn's disease activity index scores and C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in patients without previous infliximab treatment, although C-reactive protein levels were positive in all cases with previous infliximab exposure at weeks 12 and 52. Endoscopic mucosal healing was achieved with adalimumab dose escalation in 2 cases without previous infliximab treatment.

Conclusions

Adalimumab dose-escalation therapy is effective in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, especially in cases without previous infliximab treatment.

Long-Term Clinical Remission in Biologically Naïve Crohn's Disease Patients with Adalimumab Therapy, Including Analyses of Switch from Adalimumab to Infliximab

There is little evidence regarding the maintenance of long-term clinical remission by adalimumab (ADA) therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) patients naïve to anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment (naïve CD patients), since most CD patients are treated with ADA after infliximab (IFX) therapy. The long-term clinical response to ADA was retrospectively analyzed in 17 naïve CD patients for at least 24 months, and the serum trough IFX levels were evaluated in patients switching from ADA to IFX. Of the 17 naïve CD patients, 14 (82.4%) maintained long-term clinical remission with ADA therapy for at least 24 months, without serious adverse events. The clinical condition of 7 patients was observed for more than 36 months, and 3, 1, 1, and 2 cases maintained remission at months 42, 48, 54, and 60 after ADA therapy, respectively. Three patients (17.6%) switched from ADA to IFX less than 24 months after the start of ADA therapy, and they had remission, retaining trough levels of IFX higher than 1 μg/ml, occasionally by dose escalation. In conclusion, maintenance ADA therapy achieves long-term clinical remission in naïve CD patients. Switching from ADA to IFX is an important therapeutic option in CD patients showing loss of response to ADA, occasionally with dose escalation, based on the analysis of serum IFX trough levels.