Factors and Outcomes Associated with MRCP Use prior to ERCP in Patients at High Risk for Choledocholithiasis

Predictive Value of Transabdominal Ultrasonography in Detecting Extrahepatic Bile Duct Obstructive Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) remains the initial imaging modality in diagnosis of bile duct obstructive lesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of TAUS in detecting bile duct obstructive lesions in comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the standard method.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive study analyzed the electronic records of the patients diagnosed with obstructive jaundice from April 2017 to November 2022 at Alsafwa Consultative Medical Center in Almukalla City, Hadhramout, Yemen. All patients involved were diagnosed by TAUS and the diagnosis was confirmed by ERCP. A comparison of the diagnoses was performed.

RESULTS

TAUS and ERCP demonstrated high compatibility in bile duct obstructive lesions, with substantial agreement in detecting cholangiocarcinoma, bile duct stricture, stones, pancreatic cancer, and ampulla of Vater mass (compatibility ranging from 71.4% to 100%, Cohen's Kappa = 0.748, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation indicated strong agreement between the two methods (r=0.856). TAUS showed high sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV), particularly for bile duct stones (99.4% sensitivity, 86.7% PPV), and pancreatic carcinoma (94.3% sensitivity, 82.5% PPV), with significant effectiveness in identifying other conditions like bile duct stricture (42.6% sensitivity, 88.5% PPV) and cholangiocarcinoma (70.6% sensitivity, 100% PPV). (p<0.001). Overall, TAUS and ERCP displayed excellent compatibility across various diagnoses, with near-perfect agreement in determining the causes in the ampulla of Vater and bile duct (Kappa= 0.899, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

TAUS is a reliable and highly valuable imaging modality for detecting and determining the cause and level of bile duct obstruction in patients with obstructive jaundice which offers a non-invasive approach, radiation free, with minimal risk of serious complications.

Reducing MRCP Utilization Through a "Surgery First" Approach for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A CARES Working Group Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Choledocholithiasis in children is rising and frequently managed with an endoscopy-first (EF) approach that utilizes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a resource intensive modality that often precedes ERCP to gain further assurance of choledocholithiasis prior to intervention. MRCP can lead to a longer length of stay (LOS) and strain healthcare resources. We hypothesized that the use of MRCP is decreased with a surgery-first (SF) approach.

METHODS

The Choledocholithiasis Alliance for Research, Education, and Surgery (CARES) Working Group conducted this retrospective study on pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. SF patients underwent LC + intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Imaging studies included ultrasound (US), MRCP, and computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

From seven institutions, 357 pediatric patients were identified. The SF (n = 220) group received fewer imaging studies then EF (n = 137) (1.29 vs. 1.62; p < 0.05). US was more commonly employed and the number of US and CT scans was similar. The SF group had lower MRCP utilization than EF (29% vs. 59%; p < 0.05). EF patients that received an MRCP had the longest LOS (4.0 d [2.4, 6.3]) compared to SF that did not (1.9 d [1.2, 3.2]) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Children with choledocholithiasis managed with an EF approach receive more diagnostic imaging, especially MRCP. While MRCP remains a powerful diagnostic tool, a surgery-first approach can minimize the resource utilization and LOS associated with magnetic resonance imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pediatric DUCT Score: A Highly Specific Predictive Model for Choledocholithiasis in Children

BACKGROUND

Current adult guidelines for the management of choledocholithiasis (CDL) may not be appropriate for children. We hypothesized adult preoperative predictive factors are not reliable for predicting CDL in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating children (≤18 years of age) who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstone disease at 10 children's hospitals. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with CDL. Patients were stratified into risk groups demonstrating the presence of predictive factors for CDL. Statistical analyses were performed, and chi-square analyses were used with a significance of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 979 cholecystectomy patients were analyzed. The diagnosis of CDL was confirmed in 222 patients (22.7%) by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or intraoperative cholangiography. Three predictive factors were identified: (1) Dilated common bile duct ≥6 mm; (2) Ultrasound with Choledocholithiasis; and (3) Total bilirubin ≥1.8 mg/dL (pediatric DUCT criteria). Risk groups were based on the number of predictive factors: very high (3), high (2), intermediate (1), and low (0). The pediatric DUCT criteria demonstrated accuracies of >76%, specificity of >78%, and negative predictive values of >79%. Adult factors (elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, pancreatitis, BMI, and age) did not independently predict CDL. Based on risk stratification, the high- and very-high-risk groups demonstrated higher predictive capacity for CDL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the pediatric DUCT criteria, incorporating common bile duct dilation, choledocholithiasis seen on ultrasound, and total bilirubin ≥1.8 mg/dL, highly predicts the presence of choledocholithiasis in children. Other adult preoperative factors are not predictive of common bile duct stone in children.

The Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence into Surgical Practice

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence is touted as the future of medicine. Classical algorithms for the detection of common bile duct stones (CBD) have had poor clinical uptake due to low accuracy. This study explores the challenges of developing and implementing a machine-learning model for the prediction of CBD stones in patients presenting with acute biliary disease (ABD).

METHODS

All patients presenting acutely to Christchurch Hospital over a two-year period with ABD were retrospectively identified. Clinical data points including lab test results, demographics and ethnicity were recorded. Several statistical techniques were utilised to develop a machine-learning model. Issues with data collection, quality, interpretation and barriers to implementation were identified and highlighted.

RESULTS

Issues with patient identification, coding accuracy, and implementation were encountered. In total, 1315 patients met inclusion criteria. Incorrect international classification of disease 10 (ICD-10) coding was noted in 36% (137/382) of patients recorded as having CBD stones. Patients with CBD stones were significantly older and had higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels (p < 0.001). The no information rate was 81% (1070/1315 patients). The optimum model developed was the gradient boosted model with a PPV of 67%, NPV of 87%, sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 96% for common bile duct stones.

CONCLUSION

This paper highlights the utility of machine learning in predicting CBD stones. Accuracy is limited by current data and issues do exist around both the ethics and practicality of implementation. Regardless, machine learning represents a promising new paradigm for surgical practice.

Prevalence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Complications and Amylase Sensitivity for Predicting Pancreatitis in ERCP Patients

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure that is widely used for diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. With respect to its growing application, the present study aims to evaluate ERCP outcomes and complications. This cross-sectional study was performed using the data from 824 patients who underwent ERCP during 2014-2017 in Qom Shahid Beheshti hospital. Data were collected by a checklist and analyzed using SPSS V22. Among 824 patients, 397 (48.18%) were male and 427 (51.82%) were female with a mean age of 47 ± 6 years. The most common indications for ERCP were choledocholithiasis (78.28%) and cholestasis (20.27%), respectively. Total prevalence of complications was 15.66% and mortality rate was 0.72%. The most common complications were pancreatitis (9.59%) and bleeding (3.28%), respectively. A serum amylase level of greater than 160 could predict pancreatitis with sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 90.3%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications are inevitable but can be controlled by early diagnosis and clinical experience. Severe complications and high-risk patients may increase the mortality of the procedure.

CT imaging, classification, and complications of acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is an increasingly common condition and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is the primary initial imaging modality in the characterization of acute pancreatitis. In this article, we provide sample CECT technical acquisition parameters for pancreatic imaging. We also review the classification systems for acute pancreatitis and give examples of common and uncommon complications of acute pancreatitis.

Big-data analysis: A clinical pathway on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

A clinical pathway (CP) is a standardized approach for disease management. However, big data-based evidence is rarely involved in CP for related common bile duct (CBD) stones, let alone outcome comparisons before and after CP implementation.

AIM

To investigate the value of CP implementation in patients with CBD stones undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital in patients with CBD stones undergoing ERCP from January 2007 to December 2017. The data and outcomes were compared by using univariate and multivariable regression/linear models between the patients who received conventional care (non-pathway group, n = 467) and CP care (pathway group, n = 2196).

RESULTS

At baseline, the main differences observed between the two groups were the percentage of patients with multiple stones (P < 0.001) and incidence of cholangitis complication (P < 0.05). The percentage of antibiotic use and complications in the CP group were significantly less than those in the non-pathway group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.93, P = 0.012, adjusted OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.33-0.59, P < 0.001, respectively]. Patients spent lower costs on hospitalization, operation, nursing, medication, and medical consumable materials (P < 0.001 for all), and even experienced shorter length of hospital stay (LOHS) (P < 0.001) after the CP implementation. No significant differences in clinical outcomes, readmission rate, or secondary surgery rate were presented between the patients in the non-pathway and CP groups.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a CP for patients with CBD stones is a safe mode to reduce the LOHS, hospital costs, antibiotic use, and complication rate.

ASGE high-risk criteria for choledocholithiasis - Are they applicable in cholecystectomized patients?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The guidelines by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) suggest that in patients with gallbladder in situ, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be performed in the presence of high-risk criteria for choledocholithiasis, after biochemical tests and abdominal ultrasound. There are no specific recommendations for cholecystectomized patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of ASGE criteria for ERCP in cholecystectomized patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with high-risk ASGE criteria for choledocholithiasis who underwent ERCP from 2013-2016.

RESULTS

We included 327 patients in our analysis - 258 with gallbladder in situ (79%) and 69 with cholecystectomy (21%). We showed that the ASGE criteria true positive rate was similar between patients with and without cholecystectomy - the prevalence of choledocholithiasis on ERCP was 71% in cholecystectomized and 70% in non-cholecystectomized. In addition, both the presence and the diameter of the CBD stone were predictors of positive ERCP in both groups. In contrast, the diameter of the CBD was predictor of positive ERCP only in non-cholecystectomized patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dilatation of the CBD was not a predictive factor for choledocholithiasis in cholecystectomized patients, the ASGE criteria true positive rate was similar to that of non-cholecystectomized patients.