1
|
Kungwengwe G, Gowthorpe C, Ali SR, Warren H, Drury DJ, Ang KL, Gibson JAG, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS. Prevalence and odds of anxiety and depression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a proportional meta-analysis and regression. Br J Dermatol 2024; 191:24-35. [PMID: 38197404 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The psychological burden of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CM) is all-encompassing, affecting treatment adherence, recurrence and mortality. However, the prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression in CM remain unclear. OBJECTIVES To establish a benchmark pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression in CM, to provide magnitudes of association for clinical, therapeutic and demographic correlates, and to elucidate temporal trends in anxiety and depression from the time of diagnosis. METHODS This review followed the MOOSE guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were queried from database inception to 24 August 2023. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent authors, utilizing both the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and National Institutes of Health risk-of-bias tools for the latter. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Prevalence rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs) were derived using a random-effects model and estimating between- and within-study variance. RESULTS Nine longitudinal and 29 cross-sectional studies were included (7995 patients). Based on the JBI and NIH tools, respectively, quality assessment found 20 and 17 to be at low risk of bias, 12 and 15 to be at moderate risk and 6 and 5 to be at high risk of bias. The prevalence of anxiety [30.6% (95% CI 24.6-37.0; PI 18-47%)] and depression [18.4% (95% CI 13.4-23.9; PI 10-33%)] peaked during treatment, declining to pretreatment levels after 1 year [anxiety: 48% vs. 20% (P = 0.005); depression: 28% vs. 13% (P = 0.03)]. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3; P < 0.001], age < 60 years (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P = 0.002) and low educational level (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P < 0.001) were likely to result in a large increase in the odds of anxiety. Depression was 12.3% higher in those with stage IV vs. those with stage I CM (P = 0.05). Relative to immune checkpoint inhibition, the rates of depression were 22% (P = 0.002) and 34% (P < 0.001) higher among patients with advanced-stage CM receiving interferon-α and chemotherapy, respectively. A significant reduction in self-reported depression scores was demonstrated over time (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Notably, anxiety and depression in CM affect women, those younger than 60 years of age and the less educated, with up to 80% higher odds of anxiety in these groups. Anxiety and depression surge during chemotherapy and interferon treatment, especially in advanced CM. Our findings facilitate risk stratification and underscore the need for multidisciplinary vigilance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garikai Kungwengwe
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Stephen R Ali
- Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Swansea University, UK
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Damien J Drury
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | | | - John A G Gibson
- Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Swansea University, UK
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Thomas D Dobbs
- Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Swansea University, UK
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Iain S Whitaker
- Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Swansea University, UK
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haywood D, Kotov R, Krueger RF, Wright AGC, Forbes MK, Dauer E, Baughman FD, Rossell SL, Hart NH. Reconceptualizing mental health in cancer survivorship. Trends Cancer 2024:S2405-8033(24)00106-7. [PMID: 38890021 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
Mental health for cancer survivors in both research and clinical applications has strongly adopted a traditional nosological approach, involving the classification of psychopathology into discrete disorders. However, this approach has recently faced considerable criticism due to issues such as high comorbidity and within-disorder symptom heterogeneity across populations. Moreover, there are additional specific issues impacting the validity of traditional approaches in cancer survivorship populations, including the physiological effects of cancer and its treatments. In response, we provide the case for the hierarchical dimensional approach within psycho-oncology, in particular the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). We discuss not only the potential utility of HiTOP to research and clinical applications within psycho-oncology, but also its limitations, and what is required to apply this approach within cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Haywood
- Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Mental Health, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
| | - Roman Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Robert F Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aidan G C Wright
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Eisenberg Family Depression Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Miriam K Forbes
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Evan Dauer
- Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Mental Health, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Frank D Baughman
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Susan L Rossell
- Department of Mental Health, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia; Centre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicolas H Hart
- Human Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Exercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Egeler MD, van Leeuwen M, Lai-Kwon J, Eriksson H, Bartula I, Elashwah S, Fox L, Van Hemelrijck M, Jefford M, Lijnsvelt J, Bagge ASL, Morag O, Ny L, Bagge RO, Rogiers A, Saw RPM, Serpentini S, Iannopollo L, Thompson J, Stiller HT, Vanlaer N, van Akkooi ACJ, van de Poll-Franse LV. Understanding quality of life issues in patients with advanced melanoma: Phase 1 and 2 in the development of the EORTC advanced melanoma module. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114176. [PMID: 38875843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to develop a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QoL) module tailored for patients with advanced (resectable or unresectable stage III/IV) melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. METHODS Following the EORTC QoL Group module development guidelines, we conducted phases 1 and 2 of the development process. In phase 1, we generated a list of health-related (HR)QoL issues through a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with advanced melanoma. In phase 2, these issues were converted into questionnaire items to create the preliminary module. RESULTS Phase 1: we retrieved 8006 articles for the literature review, of which 35 were deemed relevant, resulting in 84 HRQoL issues being extracted to create the initial issue list. Semi-structured interviews with 18 HCPs and 28 patients with advanced melanoma resulted in 28 issues being added to the initial issue list. Following EORTC module development criteria, 26 issues were removed, and two issues were added after review by patient advocates. Phase 2: To ensure uniformity and avoid duplication, 16 issues were consolidated into eight items. Additionally, an independent expert contributed one new item, resulting in a preliminary module comprising 80 HRQoL items. CONCLUSION We identified a range of HRQoL issues (dry skin, xerostomia, and arthralgia) relevant to patients with stage III/IV melanoma. Future module development phases will refine the questionnaire. Once completed, this module will enable standardized assessment of HRQoL in patients with (locally) advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Egeler
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M van Leeuwen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Eriksson
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - I Bartula
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Elashwah
- Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Egypt
| | - L Fox
- King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - M Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Lijnsvelt
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A-S Lindqvist Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - O Morag
- Sheba Medical Center, The Jusjdman Cancer Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - L Ny
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Rogiers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - J Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - N Vanlaer
- Sheba Medical Center, The Jusjdman Cancer Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geens W, Vanlaer N, Nijland L, Van Laere S, Schwarze JK, Bruneau M, Neyns B, Rogiers A, Duerinck J. Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:159-169. [PMID: 38502281 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04646-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE After glioblastoma (GB) recurrence, prognosis is very cumbersome. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) have become important endpoints in clinical trials when evaluating novel treatments. We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) treated with a combination of surgical intervention (reoperation or biopsy) and intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. METHODS Patients who participated in the trial (N = 23), at a single-center university hospital were included. Data were collected using 3 patient-reported outcome measures (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and computerized NCF testing. In the responder group, baseline values were compared to results at a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, exploratory analyses compared baseline HRQoL and NCF between responders and non-responders. RESULTS There were five responders and 18 non-responders. When comparing the mean and individual baseline with follow-up results for the responders, we observed overall a stable to slight clinically relevant improvement of HRQoL in multiple subsets of the questionnaires while maintaining a stable NCF. One patient deteriorated on anxiety and depression symptoms from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In patients that responded to intracerebral immunotherapy in our institutional trial, HRQoL and NCF remained stable over time, suggesting that no detrimental effect on cognitive function or quality of life may be expected with this treatment approach. Furthermore, there seems to be an overall tendency for responders to score better on HRQoL and NCF than non-responders at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietse Geens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.
| | - Nathalie Vanlaer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Lynn Nijland
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Sven Van Laere
- Support for Quantitative and Qualitative Research (SQUARE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Julia Katharina Schwarze
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Michaël Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Anne Rogiers
- Department of Psychiatry, CHU Brugmann, A.Van Gehuchtenplein 4, Brussels, 1020, Belgium
| | - Johnny Duerinck
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vanlaer N, Dirven I, Neyns B, Rogiers A. Emotional Distress, Cognitive Complaints, and Care Needs among Advanced Cancer Survivors Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Mixed-Method Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1638. [PMID: 38730590 PMCID: PMC11083145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for a better understanding of survivorship-related issues in advanced cancer survivors treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). The purpose of this study was to identify survivorship-related issues, with a focus on psychological distress, cognitive complaints, physical sequelae, impact on family dynamics, and care needs in unresectable, advanced cancer survivors treated with ICB. METHODS Semi-structured interviews and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were conducted in survivors followed up at the University Hospital Brussels. We performed content analysis on the semi-structured interviews and analyzed the PROMs descriptively. RESULTS 70 cancer survivors (71.4%) consented to participate between July 2022 and November 2023. Clinical fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was present in 54.3% of the cancer survivors, and 18.6% had elevated cognitive complaints. We identified triggers related to clinically important psychological distress, such as immune-related adverse events, the progression/recurrence of disease, difficulties in adjusting to life after treatment, and co-existing life stressors, alongside persistent physical issues and unmet psychological and nutritional care needs. CONCLUSION Our results indicate the existence of persistent psychological, physical, and cognitive issues, and support the need for routine screening for FCR. The identified triggers related to severe psychological distress can aid clinicians in timely referring the patient, thereby enhancing survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Vanlaer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Dirven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Rogiers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, 1020 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jackson-Carroll N, Johnson C, Tawbi H, Wang XS, Whisenant M. The Symptom Experience of Patients with Advanced Melanoma Undergoing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151574. [PMID: 38220519 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has vastly improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. However, the symptom burden and intensity with their impact on quality-of-life (HRQoL) and functionality are heterogeneous and unpredictable. We used descriptive exploratory content analysis from interviews to capture the patient experience after they had completed quantitative data collection of their symptom burden and interference with the use of two patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments. DATA SOURCES Participants from a single center with advanced melanoma (n = 19) who are undergoing ICI therapy completed the Modified MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma and recorded semistructured interviews. Interpretive description informed the inductive and iterative analysis approach. CONCLUSION Participants had a heterogenous experience of ICI and melanoma-related symptoms: distress (84%), fatigue (68%), rash or skin changes (53%), pain (30%), diarrhea (30%), itching (26%), and shortness of breath (21%), with varying interference within HRQoL domains, mood (47%), relations with other people (26%), and activity (21%). Some noted a lack of physical interference (79%). Uncertainty was a pervasive theme in the interviews (68%) despite the majority having positive thoughts about ICI therapy (58%) and expectations of the success of therapy (53%). The physical and emotional burden of a melanoma diagnosis, undergoing therapy, and the uncertainty of the outcomes are pervasive for patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Communication surrounding the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, and outcomes need to be clear and acknowledge there are unknowns. Nurses may benefit from using a validated PRO instrument to help document and understand the patient's symptom experience while undergoing ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Jackson-Carroll
- Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Constance Johnson
- Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xin Shelley Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Meagan Whisenant
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Güven DC, Thong MS, Arndt V. Survivorship outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a scoping review. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-023-01507-w. [PMID: 38175366 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01507-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a central part of cancer care. However, the survivorship outcomes in patients treated with ICIs are understudied. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to evaluate the current status of the field and to establish research gaps regarding survivorship outcomes with ICIs in real-life cohorts. METHODS We used the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases to systematically filter published studies with real-life cohorts from January 1, 2010, until October 19, 2022. Studies evaluating at least one survivorship outcome in ICI-treated patients were included. RESULTS A total of 39 papers were included. Quality of life (QoL) (n = 23), toxicity burden (n = 16), and psychosocial issues (n = 9) were the most frequently evaluated survivorship outcomes. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and a response to treatment were associated with better QoL. In addition, the ICIs were associated with grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in 10-15% and late/long-term irAEs in 20-30% of the survivors. Regarding psychosocial problems, over 30% of survivors showed evidence of anxiety and depression, and 30-40% of survivors reported neurocognitive impairments. CONCLUSION The survivors treated with ICIs have impairments in most survivorship domains. Further research is needed to gather data on the understudied survivorship outcomes like late and long-term effects, fertility, financial toxicity, and return to work in survivors treated with ICIs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Available evidence demonstrates that a significant portion of survivors treated with ICIs have a significant toxicity burden, lower QoL than the general population, and a high rate of psychosocial problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Güven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
- Health Sciences University, Elazig City Hospital, Elazig, Turkey.
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Melissa Sy Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rogiers A, Willemot L, McDonald L, Van Campenhout H, Berchem G, Jacobs C, Blockx N, Rorive A, Neyns B. Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Nivolumab for Melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: Results of PRESERV MEL. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4823. [PMID: 37835517 PMCID: PMC10572061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-oncology therapy, is approved as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. PRESERV MEL (Prospective and REtrospective Study of nivolumab thERapy in adjuVant MELanoma) is a real-world observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma in clinical practice in Belgium and Luxembourg. METHODS Patients were enrolled prospectively and retrospectively during a 2-year period (January 2019-January 2021), and will be followed for 5 years. The results reported here are for the second interim analysis (cutoff date 31 December 2021). The index date was the date of first administration of adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received nivolumab for up to 12 months per label. Outcomes included relapse-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs)/treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; assessed in prospectively enrolled patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), and EQ-5D-3L instruments). HRQoL was evaluated at group level (mean change in scores from baseline based on minimally important differences) and individual patient level (percentage of patients with clinically important scores based on threshold of clinical importance). Outcomes were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS The study enrolled 152 patients (125 prospective, 27 retrospective) at 15 hospitals in Belgium and Luxembourg. Minimum potential follow-up at time of analysis was 11.4 months. Median age was 60 years (range 29-85), and 53% of patients were male. At 12 and 18 months, the RFS rates were 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.9-80.9) and 68.4% (95% CI: 60.0-75.5), respectively. Median RFS was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 14% of patients. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 23% of patients. Deaths occurred in 3% of patients and were not related to treatment. Questionnaire completion rates for HRQoL were high at baseline (90-94%) and at 24 months (78-81%). In the group-level analysis for HRQoL, mean changes in scores from baseline remained stable and did not exceed prespecified thresholds for minimally important differences during and after treatment, except for a clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-M surgery subscale scores. In the individual patient-level analysis for EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue and cognitive impairment increased during treatment (at 9 months) compared with baseline. After treatment cessation (at 18 months), the percentage of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue decreased. However, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for emotional, cognitive, and social impairment increased at 18 months compared with during treatment. Most patients with emotional impairment at 9 and 18 months did not experience disease recurrence (91% and 89%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These results confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. Cancer-specific, disease-specific, and generic HRQoL were maintained during and after treatment. The percentage of patients reporting emotional and cognitive impairment increased after treatment cessation, emphasizing the need for further investigation and tailored supportive care in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Rogiers
- Departement of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, 1020 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Guy Berchem
- Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, University of Luxembourg, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Celine Jacobs
- Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Blockx
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrée Rorive
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liege, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Danielsen JT, Strøm L, Knutzen SM, Schmidt H, Amidi A, Wu LM, Zachariae R. Psychological and behavioral symptoms in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology 2023; 32:1208-1222. [PMID: 37370196 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Improved survival rates have made it increasingly important for clinicians to focus on cancer survivorship issues affecting the quality of life of melanoma patients. To provide a comprehensive overview of the disease and treatment-related issues affecting such patients, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to estimate the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive problems among melanoma patients, both uveal and cutaneous, before, during and after treatment. METHODS The review was preregistered with PROSPERO (#CRD42020189847) and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature published up until June 2022 was undertaken using PubMed, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers screened 1418 records and quality-rated included studies. The reported prevalence rates of symptoms were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS Sixty-six studies including a total of 12,400 melanoma patients published between 1992 and 2022 were included. Pooled prevalence rates ranged from 6% to 16% for depression and 7%-30% for anxiety across diagnoses (uveal and cutaneous melanoma) and assessment time points. One third of the patients (35%) reported clinically significant fatigue, 20%-44% had cognitive complaints, while prevalence of sleep disturbance was not reported. Quality assessment indicated that 80% of the studies were of good quality. CONCLUSION A large body of research shows that depression and anxiety symptoms are prevalent in melanoma patients before, during and after treatment. However, research examining other symptoms known to affect quality of life, such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive problems, is still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine T Danielsen
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Louise Strøm
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sofie M Knutzen
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Schmidt
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ali Amidi
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa M Wu
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robert Zachariae
- Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reinhardt ME, Sun T, Pan CX, Schmults CD, Lee EH, Waldman AB. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for advanced skin cancer patients. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315:1473-1480. [PMID: 36469125 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02479-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used to study quality of life (QOL) in the skin cancer population. Advanced melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) may be associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and treatment side effects; however, it is unclear which PROM is valid and appropriate to use in these populations for both clinical and research purposes. We aimed to identify the PROMs that have been used to measure QOL in advanced skin cancer patients and determine which of these PROMs have been validated to assess QOL outcomes in this population. A PubMed and EMBASE search was conducted from its inception to March 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines with a comprehensive list of search terms under three main topics: (1) PROM; (2) advanced skin cancer; and (3) staging and interventions. We included articles utilizing a PROM measuring QOL and having a patient population with advanced skin cancer defined as melanoma stage > T1a or non-melanoma AJCC stage T3 or greater. Advanced skin cancer patients were also defined as those with metastasis or requiring adjuvant therapy (systemic chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy). Studies were excluded according to the following criteria: mix of low-risk and advanced skin cancer patients in the study population without stratification into low-risk and advanced groups, stage T1a melanoma or mix of stages without stratification, low-risk NMSC, no PROM (i.e., study specific questionnaires), non-English publication, review article or protocol paper, conference abstract, or populations including non-skin cancers. A total of 1,998 articles were identified. 82 met our inclusion criteria resulting in 22 PROMs: five generic health-related (QWB-SA, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D, SF-36, and PRISM), six general cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-C36, LASA, IOC, Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and FACT-G), nine disease-focused or specialized (EORTC QLQ-H&N35, EORTC QLQ-MEL38, EORTC QLQ-BR23, Facial Disability Index, FACT-H&N, FACT-BRM, FACT-B, FACT-M, and scqolit), and two general dermatology (Skindex-16 and DLQI) PROMs. All PROMs have been generally validated except for EORTC QLQ-MEL38. Only two PROMs have been validated in the advanced melanoma population: FACT-M and EORTC QLQ-C36. No PROMS have been validated in the advanced NMSC population. The PROMs that were validated in the advanced melanoma population do not include QOL issues unique to advanced skin tumors such as odor, bleeding, itching, wound care burden, and public embarrassment. Breast cancer and head and neck cancer instruments were adapted but not validated for use in the advanced skin cancer population due to the lack of an adequate instrument for this population. This study highlights the need for PROM instrument validation or creation specifically geared toward the advanced skin cancer population. Future studies should aim to develop and validate a PROM to assess QOL in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna Eliann Reinhardt
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
| | - Tiffany Sun
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | | | - Chrysalyne D Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | - Erica H Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Abigail B Waldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fleming B, Edison P, Kenny L. Cognitive impairment after cancer treatment: mechanisms, clinical characterization, and management. BMJ 2023; 380:e071726. [PMID: 36921926 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a debilitating side effect experienced by patients with cancer treated with systemically administered anticancer therapies. With around 19.3 million new cases of cancer worldwide in 2020 and the five year survival rate growing from 50% in 1970 to 67% in 2013, an urgent need exists to understand enduring side effects with severe implications for quality of life. Whereas cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy is recognized in patients with breast cancer, researchers have started to identify cognitive impairment associated with other treatments such as immune, endocrine, and targeted therapies only recently. The underlying mechanisms are diverse and therapy specific, so further evaluation is needed to develop effective therapeutic interventions. Drug and non-drug management strategies are emerging that target mechanistic pathways or the cognitive deficits themselves, but they need to be rigorously evaluated. Clinically, consistent use of objective diagnostic tools is necessary for accurate diagnosis and clinical characterization of cognitive impairment in patients treated with anticancer therapies. This should be supplemented with clinical guidelines that could be implemented in daily practice. This review summarizes the recent advances in the mechanisms, clinical characterization, and novel management strategies of cognitive impairment associated with treatment of non-central nervous system cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Fleming
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Edison
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Laura Kenny
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lai-Kwon J, Inderjeeth AJ, Lisy K, Sandhu S, Rutherford C, Jefford M. Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy on health-related quality of life of people with stage III and IV melanoma: a mixed-methods systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2023; 184:83-105. [PMID: 36907021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) have significantly improved disease control and survival in people with stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma. Understanding the impact of therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is vital for treatment decision-making and determining targets for supportive care intervention. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise the impact of ICIs and TT on all domains of HRQL in these populations. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2022 on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review question were extracted and synthesised in tables according to setting (adjuvant versus metastatic), treatment type (ICI versus TT) and HRQL issue. RESULTS Twenty-eight papers describing 27 studies were included: 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four cohort studies, four single arm cross-sectional studies, two qualitative studies, one case control study and one mixed-methods study. In four studies of people with resected stage III melanoma, adjuvant pembrolizumab and dabrafenib-trametinib did not clinically or statistically change HRQL compared to baseline. In 17 studies of people with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on symptoms, functioning and overall HRQL were noted across different study designs. TT was associated with improvements in symptoms, functioning and HRQL across six studies. CONCLUSION This review highlights the key physical, psychological and social issues experienced by people with stage III and IV melanoma treated with ICI and TT. Inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on HRQL were observed in different study designs. This highlights the need for treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measures for determining the impact of these therapies on HRQL and real-world data to inform treatment decision-making and appropriate supportive care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bach A, Knauer K, Graf J, Schäffeler N, Stengel A. Psychiatric comorbidities in cancer survivors across tumor subtypes: A systematic review. World J Psychiatry 2022; 12:623-635. [PMID: 35582337 PMCID: PMC9048448 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatric disorders are common but underdiagnosed in cancer survivors. Research suggests that tumor type has an effect on the prevalence of clinically relevant depression, anxiety, comorbid anxiety-depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
AIM To identify studies that examined the prevalence of clinically relevant levels of depression, anxiety, comorbid anxiety-depression and PTSD for patients with one or more tumor sites and compare those prevalences between cancer subtypes.
METHODS Four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, PubPsych and the Cochrane Database) were searched and resulted in a total of 2387 articles to be screened. To be included, a study must have investigated cancer-free and posttreatment survivors using tools to assess clinically relevant levels of the listed psychiatric comorbidities. All articles were screened by two authors with a third author reviewing debated articles.
RESULTS Twenty-six studies on ten different tumor types fulfilled all inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The studies showed heterogeneity regarding the study characteristics, number of participants, time since diagnosis, and assessment tools. Generally, all four comorbidities show higher prevalences in cancer survivors than the general population. Brain tumor survivors were reported to have a relatively high prevalence of both depression and anxiety. Studies with melanoma survivors reported high prevalences of all four psychiatric comorbidities. Regarding comorbidities, a wide range in prevalence existed across the tumor types. Within one cancer site, the prevalence also varied considerably among the studies.
CONCLUSION Psychiatric comorbidities are more frequent in cancer survivors than in the general population, as reflected by the prevalence of depression, anxiety, comorbid anxiety-depression and PTSD across all tumor subtypes. Developing generalized screening tools that examine psychological distress in cancer survivors up to at least ten years after diagnosis could help to understand and address the psychological burden of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bach
- Section Psychooncology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Klara Knauer
- Section Psychooncology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Johanna Graf
- Section Psychooncology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Norbert Schäffeler
- Section Psychooncology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Section Psychooncology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
- Germany & Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pinto M, Marotta N, Caracò C, Simeone E, Ammendolia A, de Sire A. Quality of Life Predictors in Patients With Melanoma: A Machine Learning Approach. Front Oncol 2022; 12:843611. [PMID: 35402230 PMCID: PMC8990304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.843611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important recognized health outcome for cancer treatments, but also disease course with slower recovery and increased morbidity. These issues are of implication in melanoma, which maintains a risk of disease progression for many years after diagnosis. This study aimed to explore and weigh factors in the perception of the quality of life and possible relationships with demographic–clinical characteristics in people with melanoma via a machine learning approach. In this observational study, patients with melanoma, without metastatic disease, were recruited from January 2020 to December 2021 with a follow-up of at least one year. Demographic variables and clinics were collected, and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) was adopted as the physical and mental aspects of the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure. All the variables were processed in a random forest model to weigh at each node of each tree of this machine learning regression model, their actual weight in SF-12 score. We included 203 melanoma patients, mean aged 59.25 ± 15.1 years: 56 (27%) affecting the upper limbs and 147 (73%) affecting the trunk. The model of 142 patients with no missing value, generating 92 trees (MSE = 0.45, R2 of 0.78), reported that the lesion site was the most influencing variable on HRQoL based on the decrease in Gini impurity in variable weighing at each node intersection in forest generation. In this scenario, we built two distinct models for lesion sites and demonstrated that the variable that most influenced the quality of life in upper limb melanoma was lymphedema, while BMI was in the trunk. Given these results, random forest regressions could play a crucial role in the clinical and rehabilitation approach. The machine-learning model for detecting the HRQoL predictor in melanoma patients indicates that the experienced lymphedema and BMI may influence the HRQoL perception. This study suggests that the prevention and treatment of lymphedema and bodyweight reduction might improve the quality of life in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Strategic Health Services Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Marotta
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Corrado Caracò
- Melanoma and Skin Cancer Surgery Unit, Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ester Simeone
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Ammendolia
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cognitive adverse effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy: are interventions within reach? Nat Rev Neurol 2022; 18:173-185. [PMID: 35140379 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00617-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
One in three people will be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetime. The community of cancer patients is growing, and several common cancers are becoming increasingly chronic; thus, cancer survivorship is an important part of health care. A large body of research indicates that cancer and cancer therapies are associated with cognitive impairment. This research has mainly concentrated on chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment but, with the arrival of immunotherapies, the focus is expected to widen and the number of studies investigating the potential cognitive effects of these new therapies is rising. Meanwhile, patients with cognitive impairment and their healthcare providers are eagerly awaiting effective approaches to intervene against the cognitive effects of cancer treatment. In this Review, we take stock of the progress that has been made and discuss the steps that need to be taken to accelerate research into the biology underlying cognitive decline following chemotherapy and immunotherapy and to develop restorative and preventive interventions. We also provide recommendations to clinicians on how to best help patients who are currently experiencing cognitive impairment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lai-Kwon J, Kelly B, Lane S, Biviano R, Bartula I, Brennan F, Kivikoski I, Thompson J, Dhillon HM, Menzies A, Long GV. Feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a nurse-led survivorship program for people with metastatic melanoma (MELCARE). Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9587-9596. [PMID: 36136246 PMCID: PMC9492451 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07360-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapy (TT) have improved the survival of people with metastatic melanoma. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a novel model of nurse-led, telehealth-delivered survivorship care (MELCARE) for this survivor group. METHODS People ≥ 18 years diagnosed with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma who were ≥ 6 months post initiation of ICI/TT with a radiological response suggestive of a long-term response to ICI/TT were recruited from a specialist melanoma centre in Australia. All participants received MELCARE, a nurse-led survivorship program involving two telehealth consultations 3 months apart, needs assessment using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and creation of a survivorship care plan. Feasibility, acceptability, and utility were assessed using rates of consent and study completion, time taken to complete each component of MELCARE, the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), and a customised utility survey. RESULTS 31/54 (57%) people consented. Participants were male (21, 68%), with a median age of 67 (range: 46-82). Eleven (35%) were receiving/had received ipilimumab and nivolumab and 27 (87%) had ceased treatment. Feasibility was demonstrated with 97% completing MELCARE. Utility was demonstrated on a customised survey and supported by a reduction in the mean DT score (initial: 5.6, SD: 2.9; follow-up: 1.5, SD: 1.2). Acceptability was demonstrated on 3/4 AIM items. CONCLUSION MELCARE was feasible and acceptable with high levels of utility. However, the consent rate was 57% indicating some people do not require support. Future studies should consider MELCARE's optimal timing, resourcing, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brooke Kelly
- Melanoma Patients Australia, Varsity Lakes, Australia
| | - Sarah Lane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Iris Bartula
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia ,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Haryana M. Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia ,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ,Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia ,Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia ,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ,Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia ,Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Living with Metastatic Cancer: A Roadmap for Future Research. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123684. [PMID: 33302472 PMCID: PMC7763639 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although people with metastatic cancer are living longer with their disease, they are faced with challenges that can interfere with their quality of life. These challenges include worsening disease, survival time, symptoms, distress, and financial problems. The aim of this review paper is to describe a framework to guide future efforts to address these challenges. The framework includes the risk factors (predisposing factors), triggers (precipitating factors), and responses (perpetuating factors) that contribute to the onset and maintenance of problems in living with metastatic cancer. We conclude by suggesting areas for future work to prevent problems, manage triggers, and reduce unhelpful responses. Abstract Living with metastatic cancer, or metavivorship, differs from cancer survivorship and has changed as novel treatments have increased survival time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe factors that impact challenges in metavivorship within a conceptual framework to guide future research. This review focuses on the specific metavivorship outcomes of progressive disease, survival time, symptoms, distress, financial toxicity, and quality of life. We describe the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating (3P) model of metavivorship. Understanding the biological, psychological, and social 3P factors that contribute to the development and maintenance of challenges in metavivorship provides a roadmap for future research. Implications of this model include prevention by targeting predisposing factors, management of precipitating factors after onset of metastatic disease, and treatment of perpetuating factors to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life during the chronic phase of metavivorship. This can be accomplished through biopsychosocial screening efforts, monitoring of patient-reported outcomes, education and communication interventions, interdisciplinary symptom management, advance care planning, and behavioral interventions to cultivate psychological resilience.
Collapse
|