1
|
Costa R, Mesquita A, Motrico E, Domínguez-Salas S, Dikmen-Yildiz P, Saldivia S, Vousoura E, Osorio A, Wilson CA, Bina R, Levy D, Christoforou A, González MF, Hancheva C, Felice E, Pinto TM. Unmet needs in mental healthcare for women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression and/or anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2024; 150:474-491. [PMID: 38342101 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND Unmet needs in perinatal mental healthcare are an important public health issue particularly in the context of a stressful life event such as the COVID-19 pandemic but data on the extent of this problem are needed. AIM The aim of this study is to determine the (1) proportion of women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression, anxiety or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety, receiving mental healthcare overall and by country and (2) factors associated with receiving mental healthcare. METHOD Women in the perinatal period (pregnancy or up to 6 months postpartum) participating in the Riseup-PPD-COVID-19 cross-sectional study, reported on sociodemographic, social support health-related factors, and COVID-19 related factors, and on symptoms of depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS]) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) using self-report questionnaires. Clinically significant symptoms were defined as EPDS ≥ 13 for depression and GAD-7 ≥ 10 for anxiety. Mental healthcare was defined as self-reported current mental health treatment. RESULTS Of the 11 809 participants from 12 countries included in the analysis, 4 379 (37.1%) reported clinically significant symptoms of depression (n = 1 228; 10.4%; EPDS ≥ 13 and GAD-7 ⟨ 10), anxiety (n = 848; 7.2%; GAD-7 ≥ 10 and EPDS ⟨ 13) or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety (n = 2 303; 19.5%; EPDS ≥ 13 and GAD-7 ≥ 10). Most women with clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety, or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety were not receiving mental healthcare (89.0%). Variation in the proportion of women with clinically significant symptoms of depression and/or anxiety reporting mental healthcare was high (4.7% in Turkey to 21.6% in Brazil). Women in the postpartum (vs. pregnancy) were less likely (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.88), whereas women with previous mental health problems (vs. no previous mental health problems) (OR 5.56; 95% CI 4.41-7.01), were more likely to receive mental healthcare. CONCLUSION There are high unmet needs in mental healthcare for women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression and/or anxiety across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies beyond the COVID-19 pandemic and covering the whole range of mental health problems in the perinatal period are warranted to understand the gaps in perinatal mental healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Mesquita
- School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ProChild CoLab Against Poverty and Social Exclusion - Association (ProChild CoLAB) Campus de Couros R, Guimarães
| | - Emma Motrico
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucia, Spain
| | | | | | - Sandra Saldivia
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine. Universidad de Concepción, Chile
| | - Eleni Vousoura
- Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Ana Osorio
- Graduate Program on Developmental Disorders and Mackenzie Center for Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Claire A Wilson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rena Bina
- The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
| | - Drorit Levy
- The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
| | - Andri Christoforou
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, European University Cyprus, Cyprus
| | | | | | | | - Tiago Miguel Pinto
- Hei-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roddy Mitchell A, Gordon H, Atkinson J, Lindquist A, Walker SP, Middleton A, Tong S, Hastie R. Prevalence of Perinatal Anxiety and Related Disorders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2343711. [PMID: 37976063 PMCID: PMC10656650 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Anxiety disorders are associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are thought to be disproportionally burdened by these disorders, yet their prevalence is unclear. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of 6 anxiety and related disorders among perinatal women in LMICs. Data Sources Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until September 7, 2023. Study Selection Studies conducted in World Bank-defined LMICs and reporting prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, or adjustment disorder during the perinatal period (conception to 12 months post partum) using a validated method were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Study eligibility, extracted data, and risk of bias of included studies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled point prevalence. Subgroup analyses were performed by specific anxiety disorder. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were prevalence estimates of each anxiety disorder, measured as percentage point estimates and corresponding 95% CIs. Results At total of 10 617 studies were identified, 203 of which met the inclusion criteria and reported the outcomes of 212 318 women from 33 LMICs. Generalized anxiety disorder was the most reported (184 studies [90.6%]) and most prevalent disorder at 22.2% (95% CI, 19.4%-25.0%; n = 173 553). Posttraumatic stress disorder was the second most prevalent (8.3%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.2%; 33 studies; n = 22 452). Adjustment disorder was least prevalent (2.9%; 95% CI, 0.0%-14.1%; 2 studies; n = 475). The prevalence of generalized anxiety varied by country income status, with the highest prevalence among lower-middle-income countries (27.6%; 95% CI, 21.6%-33.9%; 59 studies; n = 25 109), followed by low-income (24.0%; 95% CI, 15.3%-33.8%; 11 studies; n = 4961) and upper-middle-income (19.1%; 95% CI, 16.0%-22.4%; 110 studies; n = 138 496) countries. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that 1 in 5 women living in LMICs experience anxiety disorders during pregnancy and post partum. Targeted action is needed to reduce this high burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Roddy Mitchell
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hannah Gordon
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Atkinson
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthea Lindquist
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan P. Walker
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Middleton
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Tong
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roxanne Hastie
- Mercy Perinatal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pabon S, Guida JP, Lamus MN, Charles CMP, Parpinelli MA, Escobar MF, Cecatti JG, Costa ML. Impacts of childbirth on anxiety, disability, and depression: Results from a Brazilian cohort. Health Care Women Int 2023; 45:1034-1047. [PMID: 37748187 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2023.2261104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Conditions such as violence, drug abuse, sexual satisfaction, anxiety, depression, and disability interfere with a healthy pregnancy and can also account for maternal morbidity. The instrument WOICE was built by WHO to measure it. We applied WOICE in a prospective cohort of 125 pregnant women, using a before-after approach, during the third trimester of pregnancy, and after 42 until 90 days of childbirth. 60% had anxiety during pregnancy, decreasing to 48.8% after delivery (p = 0.07), and depression scores decreased from 7.56 to 5.80 (p = 0.014). Disability affected 62.4% and 56, respectively. 9.6% used drugs during pregnancy, reducing to 4.0% after delivery (RR 0.69, IC 0.49 - 0.69).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Pabon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icesi University and Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - José Paulo Guida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Martha Narvaez Lamus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icesi University and Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - Charles MPoca Charles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Mary Angela Parpinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
| | - María Fernanda Escobar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icesi University and Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
| | - José Guilherme Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Maria Laura Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas School of Medicine, Campinas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hababa H, Assarag B. Measurement of maternal morbidity during postpartum with the WHO-WOICE tools in Morocco. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:310. [PMID: 37131181 PMCID: PMC10152575 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05615-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal morbidity refers to any health problems or complications experienced by a woman during pregnancy, childbirth, or the postpartum period. Many studies have documented the, mostly negative, effects of maternal ill-health on functioning. Although, measurement of maternel morbidity remains underdeveloped. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-severe maternal morbidities (including overall health, domestic and sexual violence, functionality, and mental health) in women during postpartum care and further analyze factors associated with compromised mental functioning and clinical health by administration of the WHO's WOICE 2.0 instrument. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted at 10 Health centers in Marrakech, Morocco with WOICE questionnaire included three sections: the first with maternal and obstetric history, sociodemographic data, risk and environment factors, violence and sexual health; the second considers functionality and disability, general symptoms and mental health; and the third includes data on physical and laboratory tests. This paper presents descriptive data on the distribution of functioning status among postpartum women. RESULTS A total of 253 women averaging 30 years of age participated. For self-reported health status of women, more than 40% reported good health, and just 9.09% of women had a health condition reported by the attending physician. Among postpartum women with clinical diagnoses, 16.34% had direct (obstetric) conditions and 15.56% indirect (medical) problems. When screening for factors in the expanded morbidity definition, about 20.95% reported exposure to violence. Anxiety was identified in 29.24% of cases, and depression in 17.78%. Looking into gestational results, just 14.6% delivered by cesarean section and 15.02% had preterm birth. We found also that 97% reported "good baby health" in the postpartum evaluation, with 92% of exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSION Considering these results, improving the quality of care for women requires a multi-faceted approach, including increased research, better access to care, and improved education and resources for women and healthcare providers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mateus V, Cruz S, Costa R, Mesquita A, Christoforou A, Wilson CA, Vousoura E, Dikmen-Yildiz P, Bina R, Dominguez-Salas S, Contreras-García Y, Motrico E, Osório A. Rates of depressive and anxiety symptoms in the perinatal period during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparisons between countries and with pre-pandemic data. J Affect Disord 2022; 316:245-253. [PMID: 35964769 PMCID: PMC9365708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant threat to perinatal mental health. This study examined differences in clinically significant depression, anxiety, and co-morbid symptoms among pregnant and postpartum women across several countries and compared prevalence of perinatal depression and anxiety before and during the pandemic in each participating country. METHODS Participants were 3326 pregnant and 3939 postpartum women (up to six months postpartum) living in Brazil, Chile, Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. An online survey was completed between June 7th and October 31st 2020, and included the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7). The pre-pandemic studies were identified through literature review. RESULTS Prevalence of clinically significant depression (EPDS≥13), anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 10), and co-morbid (EPDS≥13 and GAD-7 ≥ 10) symptoms was 26.7 %, 20 % and 15.2 %, in pregnant women, and 32.7 %, 26.6 % and 20.3 %, in postpartum women, respectively. Significant between-country differences were found in all mental health indicators in both perinatal periods. Higher levels of symptoms were observed during (versus before) the pandemic, especially among postpartum women. LIMITATIONS Participants were mostly highly educated and cohabiting with a partner. The online nature of the survey may have limited the participation of women from vulnerable socio-economically backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS Our findings expand previous literature on the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health, by highlighting that this may be influenced by country of residence. Mental health care policies and interventions should consider the unique needs of perinatal women in different parts of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mateus
- Developmental Disorders Program and Mackenzie Center for Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sara Cruz
- Instituto de Psicologia e de Ciências de Educação [Institute of Psychology and Education], Lusíada University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Centro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento (CIPD) [The Psychology for Positive Development Research Center], Lusíada University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal; Lusófona University/HEI-Lab, Digital Human-environment Interaction Labs, Portugal
| | - Ana Mesquita
- School of Psychology, University of Minho, Portugal
| | - Andri Christoforou
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, European University Cyprus, Cyprus
| | - Claire A Wilson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Eleni Vousoura
- Department of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | | | - Rena Bina
- School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Israel
| | | | - Yolanda Contreras-García
- Departamento de Obstetricia y Puericultura, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Chile
| | - Emma Motrico
- Psychology Department, Universidad Loyola Andalucia, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ana Osório
- Developmental Disorders Program and Mackenzie Center for Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lamus MN, Pabon S, MPoca C, Guida JP, Parpinelli MA, Cecatti JG, Vidarte MF, Costa ML. Giving women WOICE postpartum: prevalence of maternal morbidity in high-risk pregnancies using the WHO-WOICE instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:357. [PMID: 33952188 PMCID: PMC8097898 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03727-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are no accurate estimates of the prevalence of non-severe maternal morbidities. Given the lack of instruments to fully assess these morbidities, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed an instrument called WOICE. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-severe maternal morbidities in puerperal women and factors associated to impaired clinical, social and mental health conditions. Method A cross-sectional study with postpartum women at a high-risk outpatient clinic in southeast Brazil, from November 2017 to December 2018. The WOICE questionnaire included three sections: the first with maternal and obstetric history, sociodemographic data, risk and environment factors, violence and sexual health; the second considers functionality and disability, general symptoms and mental health; and the third includes data on physical and laboratory tests. Data collection was supported by Tablets with REDCAP software. Initially, a descriptive analysis was performed, with general prevalence of all variables contained in the WOICE, including scales on anxiety and depression (GAD-7 and PHQ-9- impaired if ≥10), functionality (WHODAS- high disability scores when ≥37.4) and data on violence and substance use. Subsequently, an evaluation of cases with positive findings was performed, with a Poisson regression to investigate factors associated to impaired non-clinical and clinical conditions. Results Five hundred seventeen women were included, majority (54.3%) multiparous, between 20 and 34 years (65.4%) and with a partner (75,6%). Over a quarter had (26.2%) preterm birth. Around a third (30.2%) reported health problems informed by the physician, although more than 80% considered having good or very good health. About 10% reported any substance use and 5.9% reported exposure to violence. Anxiety was identified in 19.8% of cases, depression in 36.9% and impaired functioning in 4.4% of women. Poisson regression identified that poor overall health rating was associated to increased anxiety/depression and impaired functioning. Having a partner reduced perception of women on the presence of clinical morbidities. Conclusion During postpartum care of a high-risk population, over one third of the considered women presented anxiety and depression; 10% reported substance use and around 6% exposure to violence. These aspects of women’s health need further evaluation and specific interventions to improve quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M N Lamus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foundation Valle del Lilli, Cali, Colombia
| | - S Pabon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foundation Valle del Lilli, Cali, Colombia
| | - C MPoca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil
| | - J P Guida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil
| | - M A Parpinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil
| | - J G Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil
| | - M F Vidarte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foundation Valle del Lilli, Cali, Colombia
| | - M L Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-891, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|