1
|
Zhong D, Li X, Yin Z, Chen P, Li Y, Tian J, Wang L, Liu H, Yin K, Zhu L, Kong L, Chen K, Li Y, Hong C, Wang C. Circ-ITCH promotes the ubiquitination degradation of HOXC10 to facilitate osteogenic differentiation in disuse osteoporosis through stabilizing BRCA1 mRNA via IGF2BP2-mediated m 6A modification. J Transl Med 2025; 23:376. [PMID: 40148953 PMCID: PMC11951756 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06050-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) facilitated by mechanical loading is a promising therapy for disuse osteoporosis (DOP), however, it is difficult to implement mechanical loading for a majority of patients. Our study aims to identify circ-ITCH-mediated novel approach to facilitate osteogenic differentiation in DOP. METHODS A rat DOP model and human BM-MSCs under microgravity condition were generated as in vivo and in vitro models of DOP, respectively. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone parameters were examined in rats. The histological changes of bones and mineralization were monitored by H&E, Alcian blue and Alizarin red S staining. Co-IP was employed to examine the ubiquitination of HOXC10 and the interaction between HOXC10 and BRCA1. The direct associations among circ-ITCH, IGFBP2 and BRCA1 mRNA were assessed by RIP, FISH and RNA pull-down assays. RESULTS Circ-ITCH was downregulated in rat model of DOP and BM-MSCs under microgravity stimulation. Circ-ITCH overexpression promoted osteogenic differentiation in BM-MSCs under microgravity condition. The altered bone parameters, such as BMD, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and bone microstructure in DOP rats were rescued by circ-ITCH overexpression. Mechanistically, circ-ITCH enhanced the ubiquitination degradation of HOXC10 through enhancing BRCA1 mRNA stability. Circ-ITCH directly bound to IGF2BP2 protein to stabilize BRCA1 mRNA via m6A modification, thus facilitating osteogenic differentiation in BM-MSCs under microgravity condition. CONCLUSION Circ-ITCH stabilized BRCA1 mRNA via IGF2BP2-mediated m6A modification, thereby facilitating the ubiquitination degradation of HOXC10 to promote osteogenic differentiation in DOP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Zhong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Aging Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xi Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhen Yin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yusheng Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jian Tian
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Long Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- The School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hua Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ke Yin
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Lemei Zhu
- School of Public Health, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
| | - Lingyu Kong
- Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kunli Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yaochun Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chungu Hong
- Department of Orthopedics, Movement System Injury and Repair Research Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chenggong Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Aging Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
- National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seymour L, Nuru N, Johnson KR, Gutierrez JMV, Njoku VT, Darie CC, Neagu AN. Roles of Post-Translational Modifications of Transcription Factors Involved in Breast Cancer Hypoxia. Molecules 2025; 30:645. [PMID: 39942749 PMCID: PMC11820228 DOI: 10.3390/molecules30030645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BC is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Cellular stress is a condition that leads to disrupted homeostasis by extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Among other stressors, hypoxia is a driving force for breast cancer (BC) progression and a general hallmark of solid tumors. Thus, intratumoral hypoxia is an important determinant of invasion, metastasis, treatment failure, prognosis, and patient mortality. Acquisition of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype is also a consequence of tumor hypoxia. The cellular response to hypoxia is mainly regulated by the hypoxia signaling pathway, governed by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), mainly HIF1α. HIFs are a family of transcription factors (TFs), which induce the expression of target genes involved in cell survival and proliferation, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, resisting apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis. HIF1α cooperates with a large number of other TFs. In this review, we focused on the crosstalk and cooperation between HIF1α and other TFs involved in the cellular response to hypoxia in BC. We identified a cluster of TFs, proposed as the HIF1α-TF interactome, that orchestrates the transcription of target genes involved in hypoxia, due to their post-translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, ubiquitination/deubiquitination, SUMOylation, hydroxylation, acetylation, S-nitrosylation, and palmitoylation. PTMs of these HIF1α-related TFs drive their stability and activity, degradation and turnover, and the bidirectional translocation between the cytoplasm or plasma membrane and nucleus of BC cells, as well as the transcription/activation of proteins encoded by oncogenes or inactivation of tumor suppressor target genes. Consequently, PTMs of TFs in the HIF1α interactome are crucial regulatory mechanisms that drive the cellular response to oxygen deprivation in BC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Seymour
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Niyogushima Nuru
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Kaya R. Johnson
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Jennifer Michel Villalpando Gutierrez
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Victor Tochukwu Njoku
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Costel C. Darie
- Biochemistry & Proteomics Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA; (L.S.); (N.N.); (K.R.J.); (J.M.V.G.); (V.T.N.)
| | - Anca-Narcisa Neagu
- Laboratory of Animal Histology, Faculty of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, Carol I bvd. 20A, 700505 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quan T, Cockburn J, Dhesy-Thind S, Bane A, Leong H, Geleff C, Devion C, Ajel N, Jerzak KJ. The Significance of Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer: A Hypothesis-Generating Narrative Review. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2364-2375. [PMID: 38785457 PMCID: PMC11119174 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is frequently diagnosed among Canadian women. While targeted therapies are available for most BC patients; treatment resistance is common and novel therapeutic targets are of interest. Thyroid hormones (TH) bound to thyroid hormone receptors (THR) influence cell proliferation and differentiation; they are also involved in the growth and development of normal breast tissue. Evidence suggests that THRβ is a tumor suppressor in various solid tumors. PURPOSE This narrative review discusses retrospective studies regarding the clinical relevance of THRβ as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in BC. METHODS We consulted with an information specialist to develop a search strategy to find all literature related to THRα expression as a potential prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in breast cancer. The primary search was developed for Medline and translated to Embase. The searches were conducted on the Ovid platform on 18 August 2023. RESULTS Across seven retrospective studies identified, several have shown an association between higher THRβ1 expression with a lower risk of BC recurrence and with longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Some evidence suggests that THRβ expression is associated with a lower risk of BC recurrence and death. Validation of THRβ as an independent prognostic biomarker and possible predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy is of interest. Given that THRβ is upstream of the AKT/PI3K pathway, its potential as a predictive biomarker of response to AKT inhibitors and/or PI3K inhibitors may also be of value. Finally, the potential re-purposing of THRβ agonists as anti-cancer agents warrants investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trinity Quan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (T.Q.); (N.A.)
| | - Jessica Cockburn
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (J.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada;
| | - Anita Bane
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (J.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Hon Leong
- Department of Medical Biophysics Temerty, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (H.L.); (C.G.)
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Christopher Geleff
- Department of Medical Biophysics Temerty, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (H.L.); (C.G.)
| | - Catherine Devion
- Library Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| | - Noor Ajel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (T.Q.); (N.A.)
| | - Katarzyna J. Jerzak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada; (T.Q.); (N.A.)
- Library Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan S, Imam M. Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:110. [PMID: 37351713 PMCID: PMC10290022 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00732-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease that is the most common cancer in women worldwide. However, precise subtyping and corresponding treatments have improved patient outcomes. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2m) is a unique BC subset with dual drivers: homologous recombination deficiency and hormone receptor signaling. Wild-type BRCA1/2 suppresses estrogen receptor-mediated signaling. Loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1/2 release estrogen receptor suppression, leading to reduced sensitivity to endocrine therapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) exert antitumor effects against this subtype and can be used in combination with endocrine therapy. Although PARPis have been evaluated in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, their efficacy against HR+/HER2- BC has not been clearly established. The present review summarizes recent advances and prospects in the progress of the HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m subgroup. As such, this article provides theoretical guidance for future research and promotes the use of PARPis for the treatment of HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunchao Yan
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China.
| | - Murshid Imam
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
[Therapeutic strategies for the treatment of endocrine resistant hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer]. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:69-87. [PMID: 36307325 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
HR+ breast cancers are defined by the prominence of signaling pathways dependent on the estrogen receptor. Endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for these advanced diseases. Resistance to these treatments, called hormone resistance, appears invariably with biological mechanisms that have led to the development of therapeutic opportunities. An exhaustive literature review was carried out concerning the biology of the hormone resistance pathways, the therapeutic options before the era of CDK4/6 inhibitors, the rise of CDK4/6 inhibitors and the therapeutic prospects in a situation of hormone resistance. Various biological abnormalities have been identified in the mechanisms of hormone resistance such as changes in the estrogen receptor, mutations in the ESR1 gene, aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway or cell cycle deregulations. Historical strategies for circumventing this hormone resistance have been based on hormonal manipulation, on the development of new endocrine therapy such as fulvestrant (selective estrogen receptor inhibitor, SERD), on combinations of treatments such as everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor. This strategy combining endocrine therapy and targeted therapy has led to the development of combinations with CDK4/6 inhibitors which have now become a standard treatment in the hormone resistance phase. The future of this therapeutic era remains to be written with new combinations of hormone therapy and targeted therapy such as PI3K inhibitors or even with the positioning of new SERDs in clinical development.
Collapse
|
6
|
Malbeteau L, Jacquemetton J, Languilaire C, Corbo L, Le Romancer M, Poulard C. PRMT1, a Key Modulator of Unliganded Progesterone Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:9509. [PMID: 36076907 PMCID: PMC9455263 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The progesterone receptor (PR) is a key player in major physiological and pathological responses in women, and the signaling pathways triggered following hormone binding have been extensively studied, particularly with respect to breast cancer development and progression. Interestingly, growing evidence suggests a fundamental role for PR on breast cancer cell homeostasis in hormone-depleted conditions, with hormone-free or unliganded PR (uPR) involved in the silencing of relevant genes prior to hormonal stimulation. We herein identify the protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT1 as a novel actor in uPR signaling. In unstimulated T47D breast cancer cells, PRMT1 interacts and functions alongside uPR and its partners to target endogenous progesterone-responsive promoters. PRMT1 helps to finely tune the silencing of responsive genes, likely by promoting a proper BRCA1-mediated degradation and turnover of unliganded PR. As such, PRMT1 emerges as a key transcriptional coregulator of PR for a subset of relevant progestin-dependent genes before hormonal treatment. Since women experience periods of hormonal fluctuation throughout their lifetime, understanding how steroid receptor pathways in breast cancer cells are regulated when hormones decline may help to determine how to override treatment failure to hormonal therapy and improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Malbeteau
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - Julien Jacquemetton
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - Cécile Languilaire
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - Laura Corbo
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - Muriel Le Romancer
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - Coralie Poulard
- Université Lyon 1, F-69000, Lyon, France
- Inserm U1052 CNRS UMR 5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
P38α MAPK is a gatekeeper of uterine progesterone responsiveness at peri-implantation via Ube3c-mediated PGR degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2206000119. [PMID: 35914132 PMCID: PMC9371708 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206000119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Estrogen and progesterone specify the establishment of uterine receptivity mainly through their respective nuclear receptors, ER and PR. PR is transcriptionally induced by estrogen-ER signaling in the endometrium, but how the protein homeostasis of PR in the endometrium is regulated remains elusive. Here, we demonstrated that the uterine-selective depletion of P38α derails normal uterine receptivity ascribed to the dramatic down-regulation of PR protein and disordered progesterone responsiveness in the uterine stromal compartment, leading to defective implantation and female infertility. Specifically, Ube3c, an HECT family E3 ubiquitin ligase, targets PR for polyubiquitination and thus proteasome degradation in the absence of P38α. Moreover, we discovered that P38α restrains the polyubiquitination activity of Ube3c toward PR by phosphorylating the Ube3c at serine741 . In summary, we provided genetic evidence for the regulation of PR protein stability in the endometrium by P38α and identified Ube3c, whose activity was modulated by P38α-mediated phosphorylation, as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for PR in the uterus.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cytoplasmic Colocalization of RXRα and PPARγ as an Independent Negative Prognosticator for Breast Cancer Patients. Cells 2022; 11:cells11071244. [PMID: 35406808 PMCID: PMC8997589 DOI: 10.3390/cells11071244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Retinoid X receptor α (RXRα) is a nuclear receptor (NR) which functions as the primary heterodimeric partner of other NRs including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). We previously reported that, in breast cancers (BC), the subcellular localization of these two receptors was strongly associated with patient prognosis. In the present work, we investigated the prognosis value of the combined cytoplasmic expression of RXRα and PPARγ using a retrospective cohort of 250 BC samples. Patients with tumors expressing both NRs in tumor cell cytoplasm exhibited a significant shorter overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This was also observed for patients with stage 1 tumors. Cox univariate analysis indicated that patients with tumors coexpressing RXRα and PPARγ in the cytoplasm of tumor cells have a decreased 5 y OS rate. Cytoplasmic co-expression of the two NRs significantly correlated with HER2 positivity and with NCAD and CD133, two markers of tumor aggressiveness. Finally, in Cox multivariate analysis, the co-expression of RXRα and PPARγ in the cytoplasm appeared as an independent OS prognosticator. Altogether, this study demonstrates that the cytoplasmic co-expression of RXRα and PPARγ could be of relevance for clinicians by identifying high-risk BC patients, especially amongst those with early and node-negative disease.
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang P, Deng W, Bao H, Lin Z, Liu M, Wu J, Zhou X, Qiao M, Yang Y, Cai H, Rao F, Chen J, Chen D, Lu J, Wang H, Qin A, Kong S. SOX4 facilitates PGR protein stability and FOXO1 expression conducive for human endometrial decidualization. eLife 2022; 11:72073. [PMID: 35244538 PMCID: PMC8923662 DOI: 10.7554/elife.72073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The establishment of pregnancy in human necessitates appropriate decidualization of stromal cells, which involves steroids regulated periodic transformation of endometrial stromal cells during the menstrual cycle. However, the potential molecular regulatory mechanism underlying the initiation and maintenance of decidualization in humans is yet to be fully elucidated. In this investigation, we document that SOX4 is a key regulator of human endometrial stromal cells decidualization by directly regulating FOXO1 expression as revealed by whole genomic binding of SOX4 assay and RNA sequencing. Besides, our immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry results unravel that SOX4 modulates progesterone receptor (PGR) stability through repressing E3 ubiquitin ligase HERC4-mediated degradation. More importantly, we provide evidence that dysregulated SOX4–HERC4–PGR axis is a potential cause of defective decidualization and recurrent implantation failure in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. In summary, this study evidences that SOX4 is a new and critical regulator for human endometrial decidualization, and provides insightful information for the pathology of decidualization-related infertility and will pave the way for pregnancy improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinxiu Huang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Wenbo Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Haili Bao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Zhong Lin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Mengying Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jinxiang Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaobo Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Manting Qiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yihua Yang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Han Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Faiza Rao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jingsi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dunjin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinhua Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Haibin Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Aiping Qin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Shuangbo Kong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hsieh YP, Naler LB, Ma S, Lu C. Cell-type-specific epigenomic variations associated with BRCA1 mutation in pre-cancer human breast tissues. NAR Genom Bioinform 2022; 4:lqac006. [PMID: 35118379 PMCID: PMC8808540 DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 germline mutation carriers are predisposed to breast cancers. Epigenomic regulations have been known to strongly interact with genetic variations and potentially mediate biochemical cascades involved in tumorigenesis. Due to the cell-type specificity of epigenomic features, profiling of individual cell types is critical for understanding the molecular events in various cellular compartments within complex breast tissue. Here, we produced cell-type-specific profiles of genome-wide histone modifications including H3K27ac and H3K4me3 in basal, luminal progenitor, mature luminal and stromal cells extracted from a small pilot cohort of pre-cancer BRCA1 mutation carriers (BRCA1mut/+) and non-carriers (BRCA1+/+), using a low-input ChIP-seq technology that we developed. We discovered that basal and stromal cells present the most extensive epigenomic differences between mutation carriers (BRCA1mut/+) and non-carriers (BRCA1+/+), while luminal progenitor and mature luminal cells are relatively unchanged with the mutation. Furthermore, the epigenomic changes in basal cells due to BRCA1 mutation appear to facilitate their transformation into luminal progenitor cells. Taken together, epigenomic regulation plays an important role in the case of BRCA1 mutation for shaping the molecular landscape that facilitates tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Pang Hsieh
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Lynette B Naler
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Sai Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Chang Lu
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Z, Wei H, Li S, Wu P, Mao X. The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:305-314. [PMID: 35115765 PMCID: PMC8801368 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s336643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The progesterone receptor (PR) modulates estrogen receptors α (ERα) action in breast cancer; it is an upregulated target gene of ER, and its expression is dependent on estrogen. PR is also a valuable prognostic biomarker in breast cancer, especially in hormone-positive breast cancer. High expression of PR is more frequently observed in tumors with a better baseline prognosis (ie, luminal A) than tumors with a poor baseline prognosis (ie, luminal B). In the following review, we present the role of PR in breast cancer, including the genomic characteristics and pathways in breast cancer, PR and endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongrui Wei
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Siyan Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Pei Wu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyun Mao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li W, Wu H, Sui S, Wang Q, Xu S, Pang D. Targeting Histone Modifications in Breast Cancer: A Precise Weapon on the Way. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:736935. [PMID: 34595180 PMCID: PMC8476812 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.736935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Histone modifications (HMs) contribute to maintaining genomic stability, transcription, DNA repair, and modulating chromatin in cancer cells. Furthermore, HMs are dynamic and reversible processes that involve interactions between numerous enzymes and molecular components. Aberrant HMs are strongly associated with tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer (BC), although the specific mechanisms are not completely understood. Moreover, there is no comprehensive overview of abnormal HMs in BC, and BC therapies that target HMs are still in their infancy. Therefore, this review summarizes the existing evidence regarding HMs that are involved in BC and the potential mechanisms that are related to aberrant HMs. Moreover, this review examines the currently available agents and approved drugs that have been tested in pre-clinical and clinical studies to evaluate their effects on HMs. Finally, this review covers the barriers to the clinical application of therapies that target HMs, and possible strategies that could help overcome these barriers and accelerate the use of these therapies to cure patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shiyao Sui
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qin Wang
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shouping Xu
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Da Pang
- Harbin Medical University Third Hospital: Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitin ligase and its substrates. Biochem J 2021; 478:3467-3483. [PMID: 34591954 DOI: 10.1042/bcj20200864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and its heterodimeric binding partner BARD1 confer a high risk for the development of breast and ovarian cancers. The sole enzymatic function of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex is as a RING-type E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase, leading to the deposition of Ub signals onto a variety of substrate proteins. Distinct types of Ub signals deposited by BRCA1/BARD1 (i.e. degradative vs. non-degradative; mono-Ub vs. poly-Ub chains) on substrate proteins mediate aspects of its function in DNA double-stranded break repair, cell-cycle regulation, and transcriptional regulation. While cancer-predisposing mutations in both subunits lead to the inactivation of BRCA1/BARD1 ligase activity, controversy remains as to whether its Ub ligase activity directly inhibits tumorigenesis. Investigation of BRCA1/BARD1 substrates using rigorous, well-validated mutants and experimental systems will ultimately clarify the role of its ligase activity in cancer and possibly establish prognostic and diagnostic metrics for patients with mutations. In this review, we discuss the Ub ligase function of BRCA1/BARD1, highlighting experimental approaches, mechanistic considerations, and reagents that are useful in the study of substrate ubiquitylation. We also discuss the current understanding of two well-established BRCA1/BARD1 substrates (nucleosomal H2A and estrogen receptor α) and several recently discovered substrates (p50, NF2, Oct1, and LARP7). Lessons from the current body of work should provide a road map to researchers examining novel substrates and biological functions attributed to BRCA1/BARD1 Ub ligase activity.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kunc M, Popęda M, Biernat W, Senkus E. Lost but Not Least-Novel Insights into Progesterone Receptor Loss in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194755. [PMID: 34638241 PMCID: PMC8507533 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Estrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PgR) are crucial prognostic and predictive biomarkers that are usually co-expressed in breast cancer (BC). However, 12-24% of BCs present ERα(+)/PgR(-) phenotype at immunohistochemical evaluation. In fact, BC may either show primary PgR(-) status (in chemonaïve tumor sample), lose PgR expression during neoadjuvant treatment, or acquire PgR(-) phenotype in local relapse or metastasis. The loss of PgR expression in ERα(+) breast cancer may signify resistance to endocrine therapy and poorer outcomes. On the other hand, ERα(+)/PgR(-) BCs may have a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than double-positive tumors. Loss of PgR expression may be a result of pre-transcriptional alterations (copy number loss, mutation, epigenetic modifications), decreased transcription of the PGR gene (e.g., by microRNAs), and post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation, sumoylation). Various processes involved in the down-regulation of PgR have distinct consequences on the biology of cancer cells. Occasionally, negative PgR status detected by immunohistochemical analysis is paradoxically associated with enhanced transcriptional activity of PgR that might be inhibited by antiprogestin treatment. Identification of the mechanism of PgR loss in each patient seems challenging, yet it may provide important information on the biology of the tumor and predict its responsiveness to the therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Kunc
- Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.K.); (W.B.)
| | - Marta Popęda
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Wojciech Biernat
- Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.K.); (W.B.)
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-58-584-4481
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zattarin E, Leporati R, Ligorio F, Lobefaro R, Vingiani A, Pruneri G, Vernieri C. Hormone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Settings, and Therapeutic Implications. Cells 2020; 9:cells9122644. [PMID: 33316954 PMCID: PMC7764472 DOI: 10.3390/cells9122644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) accounts for approximately 75% of new BC diagnoses. Despite the undisputable progresses obtained in the treatment of HR+ BC in recent years, primary or acquired resistance to endocrine therapies still represents a clinically relevant issue, and is largely responsible for disease recurrence after curative surgery, as well as for disease progression in the metastatic setting. Among the mechanisms causing primary or acquired resistance to endocrine therapies is the loss of estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, which could make BC cells independent of estrogen stimulation and, consequently, resistant to estrogen deprivation or the pharmacological inhibition of estrogen receptors. This review aims at discussing the molecular mechanisms and the clinical implications of HR loss as a result of the therapies used in the neoadjuvant setting or for the treatment of advanced disease in HR+ BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Zattarin
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
| | - Rita Leporati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
| | - Francesca Ligorio
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
| | - Riccardo Lobefaro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.Z.); (R.L.); (F.L.); (R.L.); (A.V.); (G.P.)
- IFOM, The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-2390-3650
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Effects of Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of BARD1 on the Development of Non-Breast and Non-Gynecological Cancers. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11070829. [PMID: 32708251 PMCID: PMC7396976 DOI: 10.3390/genes11070829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast Cancer 1 (BRCA1) gene is a well-characterized tumor suppressor gene, mutations of which are primarily found in women with breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1-associated RING domain 1 (BARD1) gene has also been identified as an important tumor suppressor gene in breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers. Underscoring the functional significance of the BRCA1 and BARD1 interactions, prevalent mutations in the BRCA1 gene are found in its RING domain, through which it binds the RING domain of BARD1. BARD1-BRCA1 heterodimer plays a crucial role in a variety of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, including DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination (HR). However, many mutations in both BARD1 and BRCA1 also exist in other domains that significantly affect their biological functions. Intriguingly, recent genome-wide studies have identified various single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genetic alterations, and epigenetic modifications in or near the BARD1 gene that manifested profound effects on tumorigenesis in a variety of non-breast and non-gynecological cancers. In this review, we will briefly discuss the molecular functions of BARD1, including its BRCA1-dependent as well as BRCA1-independent functions. We will then focus on evaluating the common BARD1 related SNPs as well as genetic and epigenetic changes that occur in the non-BRCA1-dominant cancers, including neuroblastoma, lung, and gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, the pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions of different SNPs and BARD1 variants will also be discussed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hilton HN, Patterson McDonald LJ, Santucci N, van der Bent FR, Silvestri A, Graham JD, Clarke CL. BRCA1 Attenuates Progesterone Effects on Proliferation and NFκB Activation in Normal Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2019; 24:257-270. [PMID: 31104199 DOI: 10.1007/s10911-019-09431-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1, encoding a tumor suppressor protein, greatly enhance the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. This tissue-specificity implicates the role of ovarian hormones. Indeed, BRCA1 has been demonstrated to regulate the signalling axis of the hormone, progesterone, and its receptor, the progesterone receptor (PR), and progesterone action has been implicated in BRCA1-related tumorigenesis. BRCA1 also plays important roles in oxidative stress and activating nuclear factor kappaB (NFκB) signalling pathways. Like wildtype BRCA1 function, PR signalling has also been shown to inhibit NFκB activation. Although PR and BRCA1 networks are known to interact, their interaction at the level of NFκB activation in the human breast is not understood. This study investigates the effect of reduced BRCA1 expression on proliferation and NFκB activation in human breast cells, and the impact of progesterone on these effects. The major findings are that: 1) Reduced BRCA1 levels inhibit cell growth in normal human mammary cells and breast cancer cells; 2) Reduced BRCA1 levels stimulated inflammatory targets and NFκB activity in normal human mammary cells; 3) Wildtype BRCA1 inhibited the pro-proliferative effects of progesterone in normal mammary epithelial cells, and; 4) Progesterone attenuated BRCA1-mediated NFκB activation in normal human mammary cells. These data have important implications for our understanding of progesterone action in BRCA1 mutation carriers, and how inhibition of this action may potentially delay tumorigenesis or impart a more favourable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H N Hilton
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - L J Patterson McDonald
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - N Santucci
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - F R van der Bent
- Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A Silvestri
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - J D Graham
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
| | - C L Clarke
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School - Westmead, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Overexpression of BRCA1 in Neural Stem Cells Enhances Cell Survival and Functional Recovery after Transplantation into Experimental Ischemic Stroke. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2019; 2019:8739730. [PMID: 31073355 PMCID: PMC6470423 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8739730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Transplantation of neural stem cells (NSCs) is a promising therapy for ischemic stroke. However, the effectiveness of this approach is limited by grafted cell death. Breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 (BRCA1) could suppress apoptosis in neural progenitors and modulate oxidative stress in neurons. In this study, we found that BRCA1 was upregulated by oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R). Overexpression of BRCA1 in NSCs reduced cell apoptosis and oxidative stress after OGD/R insult. The molecule overexpression also stimulated cellular proliferation in OGD/R NSCs and increased the survival rate of grafted cells. Further, the transplantation of BRCA1-transfected NSCs into mice with ischemic stroke increased brain-derived neurotropic factor and nerve growth factor expression in the brain and elicited neurological function improvement. In addition, we found that RING finger domain and BRCT domain of BRCA1 could physically interact with p53 in NSCs. The cross talk between BRCA1 RING finger domain and p53 was responsible for p53 ubiquitination and degradation. Our findings indicate that modification with BRCA1 could enhance the efficacy of NSCs transplantation in ischemic stroke.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sialic Acid-Binding Lectin from Bullfrog Eggs Exhibits an Anti-Tumor Effect Against Breast Cancer Cells Including Triple-Negative Phenotype Cells. Molecules 2018; 23:molecules23102714. [PMID: 30347895 PMCID: PMC6222625 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Sialic acid-binding lectin from Rana catesbeiana eggs (cSBL) is a multifunctional protein that has lectin and ribonuclease activity. In this study, the anti-tumor activities of cSBL were assessed using a panel of breast cancer cell lines. cSBL suppressed the cell growth of all cancer cell lines tested here at a concentration that is less toxic, or not toxic at all, to normal cells. The growth suppressive effect was attributed to the cancer-selective induction of apoptosis. We assessed the expressions of several key molecules associated with the breast cancer phenotype after cSBL treatment by western blotting. cSBL decreased the expression level of estrogen receptor (ER) α, while it increased the phosphorylation level of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). cSBL also suppressed the expression of the progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Furthermore, it was revealed that cSBL decreases the expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1) in triple-negative breast cancer cells. These results indicate that cSBL induces apoptosis with decreasing ErbB family proteins and may have great potential for breast cancer chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative phenotype cells.
Collapse
|
20
|
Piasecka D, Kitowska K, Czaplinska D, Mieczkowski K, Mieszkowska M, Turczyk L, Skladanowski AC, Zaczek AJ, Biernat W, Kordek R, Romanska HM, Sadej R. Fibroblast growth factor signalling induces loss of progesterone receptor in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2018; 7:86011-86025. [PMID: 27852068 PMCID: PMC5349893 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
We have recently demonstrated that, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGFR2), signalling via ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2), promotes progression of breast cancer (BCa). Loss of progesterone receptor (PR), whose activity in BCa cells can be stimulated by growth factor receptors (GFRs), is associated with poor patient outcome. Here we showed that FGF7/FGFR2 triggered phosphorylation of PR at Ser294, PR ubiquitination and subsequent receptor`s degradation via the 26S proteasome pathway in BCa cells. We further demonstrated that RSK2 mediated FGF7/FGFR2-induced PR downregulation. In addition, a strong synergistic effect of FGF7 and progesterone (Pg), reflected in the enhanced anchorage-independent growth and cell migration, was observed. Analysis of clinical material demonstrated that expression of PR inversely correlated with activated RSK (RSK-P) (p = 0.016). Patients with RSK-P(+)/PR(–) tumours had 3.629-fold higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), when compared with the rest of the cohort. Moreover, RSK-P(+)/PR(–) phenotype was shown as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.006). These results indicate that the FGF7/FGFR2-RSK2 axis promotes PR turnover and activity, which may sensitize BCa cells to stromal stimuli and contribute to the progression toward steroid hormone negative BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Piasecka
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.,Department of Pathology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Kamila Kitowska
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Dominika Czaplinska
- Department of Cell Biology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Kamil Mieczkowski
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Magdalena Mieszkowska
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Lukasz Turczyk
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Andrzej C Skladanowski
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Anna J Zaczek
- Department of Cell Biology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Wojciech Biernat
- Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | | | | | - Rafal Sadej
- Department of Molecular Enzymology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
BARD1 is necessary for ubiquitylation of nucleosomal histone H2A and for transcriptional regulation of estrogen metabolism genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:1316-1321. [PMID: 29367421 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715467115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Missense mutations that disrupt the RING domain of the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 lead to increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The BRCA1 RING domain is a ubiquitin ligase, whose structure and function rely critically on forming a heterodimer with BARD1, which also harbors a RING domain. The function of the BARD1 RING domain is unknown. In families severely affected with breast cancer, we identified inherited BARD1 missense mutations Cys53Trp, Cys71Tyr, and Cys83Arg that alter three zinc-binding residues of the BARD1 RING domain. Each of these mutant BARD1 proteins retained the ability to form heterodimeric complexes with BRCA1 to make an active ubiquitin ligase, but the mutant BRCA1/BARD1 complexes were deficient in binding to nucleosomes and in ubiquitylating histone H2A. The BARD1 mutations also caused loss of transcriptional repression of BRCA1-regulated estrogen metabolism genes CYP1A1 and CYP3A4; breast epithelial cells edited to create heterozygous loss of BARD1 showed significantly higher expression of CYP1A1 and CYP3A4 Reintroduction of wild-type BARD1 into these cells restored CYP1A1 and CYP3A4 transcription to normal levels, but introduction of the cancer-predisposing BARD1 RING mutants failed to do so. These results indicate that an intact BARD1 RING domain is critical to BRCA1/BARD1 binding to nucleosomes and hence to ubiquitylation of histone H2A and also critical to transcriptional repression of BRCA1-regulated genes active in estrogen metabolism.
Collapse
|
22
|
Gray JM, Rasanayagam S, Engel C, Rizzo J. State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment. Environ Health 2017; 16:94. [PMID: 28865460 PMCID: PMC5581466 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this review, we examine the continually expanding and increasingly compelling data linking radiation and various chemicals in our environment to the current high incidence of breast cancer. Singly and in combination, these toxicants may have contributed significantly to the increasing rates of breast cancer observed over the past several decades. Exposures early in development from gestation through adolescence and early adulthood are particularly of concern as they re-shape the program of genetic, epigenetic and physiological processes in the developing mammary system, leading to an increased risk for developing breast cancer. In the 8 years since we last published a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, hundreds of new papers have appeared supporting this link, and in this update, the evidence on this topic is more extensive and of better quality than that previously available. CONCLUSION Increasing evidence from epidemiological studies, as well as a better understanding of mechanisms linking toxicants with development of breast cancer, all reinforce the conclusion that exposures to these substances - many of which are found in common, everyday products and byproducts - may lead to increased risk of developing breast cancer. Moving forward, attention to methodological limitations, especially in relevant epidemiological and animal models, will need to be addressed to allow clearer and more direct connections to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet M. Gray
- Department of Psychology and Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0246 USA
| | - Sharima Rasanayagam
- Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94109-5400 USA
| | - Connie Engel
- Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94109-5400 USA
| | - Jeanne Rizzo
- Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94109-5400 USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ubiquitination of nuclear receptors. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017; 131:917-934. [PMID: 28473472 DOI: 10.1042/cs20160708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are cellular proteins, which upon ligand activation, act to exert regulatory control over transcription and subsequent expression. Organized via systemic classification into seven subfamilies, NRs partake in modulating a vast expanse of physiological functions essential for maintenance of life. NRs display particular characteristics towards ubiquitination, the process of addition of specific ubiquitin tags at appropriate locations. Orchestrated through groups of enzymes harboring a diverse array of specialized structural components, the ubiquitination process emphatically alters the fate or downstream effects of NRs. Such influence is especially prominent in transcriptional processes such as promoter clearing for optimization and degradation pathways eliminating or recycling targeted proteins. Ultimately, the ubiquitination of NRs carries significant implications in terms of generating pathological clinical manifestations. Increasing evidence from studies involving patients and disease models suggests a role for ubiquitinated NRs in virtually every organ system. This supports the broad repertoire of roles that NRs play in the body, including modulatory conductors, facilitators, responders to external agents, and critical constituents for pharmacological or biological interventions. This review aims to cover relevant background and mechanisms of NRs and ubiquitination, with a focus towards elucidating subsequent pathophysiology and therapeutics in clinical disorders encompassing such ubiquitinated NRs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
There is an abundance of accumulating data strongly suggesting there is a key role for the progesterone receptor in the molecular events effecting the growth or containment of a variety of cancers. This knowledge should lead to novel new strategies to combat various cancers, including drugs classified as progesterone receptor modulators or monoclonal antibodies against some of the key proteins needed for cancer proliferation by suppressing immune surveillance. Areas covered: The role of the classic nuclear receptor and molecular events needed for proliferation are reviewed including cancers of the breast, endometrium, prostate, thyroid, and leiomyomas and leiomyosarcoma. The potential role of non-genomic membrane progesterone receptors is reviewed. The prognostic role of the presence of progesterone receptors is also discussed. Over 1000 research publications were read after conducting a PubMed search. Expert commentary: Discussion is made about a unique immunomodulatory protein called the progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF). The role of this protein, that is unique to rapidly growing cells, may hold a key to how the cancer cells escape immune surveillance. Thus, techniques to suppress the intracytoplasmic isoforms of PIBF may play a significant role in the fight against all cancers, not just the ones with the classic nuclear progesterone receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome H Check
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility , Cooper Medical School of Rowan University , Camden , New Jersey , United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Heublein S, Mayr D, Meindl A, Kircher A, Jeschke U, Ditsch N. Vitamin D receptor, Retinoid X receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ are overexpressed in BRCA1 mutated breast cancer and predict prognosis. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2017; 36:57. [PMID: 28427429 PMCID: PMC5399435 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-017-0517-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background BRCA1 mutated breast cancers are commonly diagnosed as negative for classical hormone receptors i.e. estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and/or Her2. Due to these common targets being absent the application of anti-endocrine therapies is rather limited and a certain focus has been set on discovering alternative target molecules. We recently highlighted thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) to predict prognosis in breast cancer patients that had been diagnosed a BRCA1 germline mutation. Vitamin D Receptor (VDR), Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) are known to interact with TRs by forming functional heterodimers. Whether VDR, RXR or PPARγ are expressed in BRCA1 mutated breast cancer or may even be present in case of triple negativity is not known. Hence the current study aimed to investigate VDR, RXR and PPARγ in BRCA1mut breast cancer and to test whether any of the three may be associated with clinico-pathological criteria including overall survival. Methods This study analyzed VDR, RXR and PPARγ by immunohistochemistry in BRCA1 associated (n = 38) and sporadic breast cancer (n = 79). Receptors were quantified by applying an established scoring system (IR-score) and were tested for association with clinico-pathological variables. Results VDR, RXR and PPARγ were detected in over 90% of triple negative BRCA1mut breast cancer and were significantly (VDR: p < 0.001, RXR: p = 0.010, PPARγ: p < 0.001) overexpressed in BRCA1 mutated as compared to sporadic cancer cases. VDR and RXR positivity predicted prolonged overall survival only in BRCA1 mutated cases while such association was not observed in sporadic breast cancer. Conclusions In conclusion, this is the first study to describe VDR, RXR and PPARγ in BRCA1 mutated breast cancer. Based on the data presented here these receptors may be hypothesized to potentially evolve as interesting markers or even targets in hereditary breast cancer. However, independent studies are indispensable thus to confirm this hypothesis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13046-017-0517-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Doris Mayr
- Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexandra Kircher
- Department of Internal Medicine, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Timmermans-Sprang EPM, Gracanin A, Mol JA. Molecular Signaling of Progesterone, Growth Hormone, Wnt, and HER in Mammary Glands of Dogs, Rodents, and Humans: New Treatment Target Identification. Front Vet Sci 2017; 4:53. [PMID: 28451590 PMCID: PMC5389977 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Mammary tumors are the most common form of neoplasia in the bitch. Female dogs are protected when they are spayed before the first estrus cycle, but this effect readily disappears and is already absent when dogs are spayed after the second heat. As the ovaries are removed during spaying, ovarian steroids are assumed to play an essential role in tumor development. The sensitivity toward tumor development is already present during early life, which may be caused by early mutations in stem cells during the first estrus cycles. Later on in life, tumors arise that are mostly steroid-receptor positive, although a small subset of tumors overexpressing human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) and some lacking estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 (triple negative) are present, as is the situation in humans. Progesterone (P4), acting through PR, is the major steroid involved in outgrowth of mammary tissue. PRs are expressed in two forms, the progesterone receptor A (PRA) and progesterone receptor B (PRB) isoforms derived from splice variants from a single gene. The dog and the whole family of canids have only a functional PRA isoform, whereas the PRB isoform, if expressed at all, is devoid of intrinsic biological activity. In human breast cancer, overexpression of the PRA isoform is related to more aggressive carcinomas making the dog a unique model to study PRA-related mammary cancer. Administration of P4 to adult dogs results in local mammary expression of growth hormone (GH) and wing less-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family 4 (Wnt4). Both proteins play a role in activation of mammary stem cells. In this review, we summarize what is known on P4, GH, and Wnt signaling in canine mammary cancer, how the family of HER receptors could interact with this signaling, and what this means for comparative and translational oncological aspects of human breast cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Gracanin
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jan A Mol
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Proliferative and Invasive Effects of Progesterone-Induced Blocking Factor in Human Glioblastoma Cells. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:1295087. [PMID: 28168193 PMCID: PMC5266854 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1295087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) is a progesterone (P4) regulated protein expressed in different types of high proliferative cells including astrocytomas, the most frequent and aggressive brain tumors. It has been shown that PIBF increases the number of human astrocytoma cells. In this work, we evaluated PIBF regulation by P4 and the effects of PIBF on proliferation, migration, and invasion of U87 and U251 cells, both derived from human glioblastomas. PIBF mRNA expression was upregulated by P4 (10 nM) from 12 to 24 h. Glioblastoma cells expressed two PIBF isoforms, 90 and 57 kDa. The content of the shorter isoform was increased by P4 at 24 h, while progesterone receptor antagonist RU486 (10 μM) blocked this effect. PIBF (100 ng/mL) increased the number of U87 cells on days 4 and 5 of treatment and induced cell proliferation on day 4. Wound-healing assays showed that PIBF increased the migration of U87 (12–48 h) and U251 (24 and 48 h) cells. Transwell invasion assays showed that PIBF augmented the number of invasive cells in both cell lines at 24 h. These data suggest that PIBF promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of human glioblastoma cells.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hong R, Roberts E, Bieniarz C. In Situ Detection of Protein Complexes and Modifications by Chemical Ligation Proximity Assay. Bioconjug Chem 2016; 27:1690-6. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hong
- Technology and Applied Research, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona 85755, United States
| | - Esteban Roberts
- Technology and Applied Research, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona 85755, United States
| | - Christopher Bieniarz
- Technology and Applied Research, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona 85755, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
New concepts on BARD1: Regulator of BRCA pathways and beyond. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2016; 72:1-17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
30
|
Heublein S, Mayr D, Meindl A, Angele M, Gallwas J, Jeschke U, Ditsch N. Thyroid Hormone Receptors Predict Prognosis in BRCA1 Associated Breast Cancer in Opposing Ways. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127072. [PMID: 26029931 PMCID: PMC4451081 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 04/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Since BRCA1 associated breast cancers are frequently classified as hormone receptor negative or even triple negative, the application of endocrine therapies is rather limited in these patients. Like hormone receptors that bind to estrogen or progesterone, thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. TRs might be interesting biomarkers - especially in the absence of classical hormone receptors. The current study aimed to investigate whether TRs may be specifically expressed in BRCA1 associated cancer cases and whether they are of prognostic significance in these patients as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases. This study analyzed TRα and TRβ immunopositivity in BRCA1 associated (n = 38) and sporadic breast cancer (n = 86). Further, TRs were studied in MCF7 (BRCA1 wildtype) and HCC3153 (BRCA1 mutated) cells. TRβ positivity rate was significantly higher in BRCA1 associated as compared to sporadic breast cancers (p = 0.001). The latter observation remained to be significant when cases that had been matched for clinicopathological criteria were compared (p = 0.037). Regarding BRCA1 associated breast cancer cases TRβ positivity turned out to be a positive prognostic factor for five-year (p = 0.007) and overall survival (p = 0.026) while TRα positivity predicted reduced five-year survival (p = 0.030). Activation of TRβ resulted in down-modulation of CTNNB1 while TRα inhibition reduced cell viability in HCC3153. However, only BRCA1 wildtype MCF7 cells were capable of rapidly degrading TRα1 in response to T3 stimulation. Significantly, this study identified TRβ to be up-regulated in BRCA1 associated breast cancer and revealed TRs to be associated with patients’ prognosis. TRs were also found to be expressed in triple negative BRCA1 associated breast cancer. Further studies need to be done in order to evaluate whether TRs may become interesting targets of endocrine therapeutic approaches, especially when tumors are triple-negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Doris Mayr
- Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Angele
- Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Gallwas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Helzer KT, Hooper C, Miyamoto S, Alarid ET. Ubiquitylation of nuclear receptors: new linkages and therapeutic implications. J Mol Endocrinol 2015; 54:R151-67. [PMID: 25943391 PMCID: PMC4457637 DOI: 10.1530/jme-14-0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily is a group of transcriptional regulators that control multiple aspects of both physiology and pathology and are broadly recognized as viable therapeutic targets. While receptor-modulating drugs have been successful in many cases, the discovery of new drug targets is still an active area of research, because resistance to NR-targeting therapies remains a significant clinical challenge. Many successful targeted therapies have harnessed the control of receptor activity by targeting events within the NR signaling pathway. In this review, we explore the role of NR ubiquitylation and discuss how the expanding roles of ubiquitin could be leveraged to identify additional entry points to control receptor function for future therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle T Helzer
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Christopher Hooper
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Shigeki Miyamoto
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Elaine T Alarid
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fang YY, Li D, Cao C, Li CY, Li TT. Glucocorticoid receptor repression mediated by BRCA1 inactivation in ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:188. [PMID: 24629067 PMCID: PMC4004164 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA mutations are the main known hereditary factor for ovarian cancer. Notably, emerging evidence indicates that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) has drawn considerable interest in ovarian cancer development. However, dynamic cross-talk between BRCA1 and GR signaling pathways are poorly understood. METHODS The regulatory effects of BRCA on GR were assessed in 146 serous ovarian cancer patients (28 pairs of BRCA1-mutated or not, 23 pairs of BRCA2-mutated or not, and 22 pairs with hypermethylated BRCA1 promoter or not). BRCA1 promoter methylation was analyzed by bisulfite sequencing using primers flanking the core promoter region. Expression levels of BRCA1 and GR were assessed by immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Regression analysis was used to examine the possible relationship between BRCA1 and GR expression levels. The knockdown and overexpression of BRCA1 were achieved using a lentiviral vector in 293 T cells, SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells, and primary non-mutated and BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancer cells. RESULTS GR expression levels were unchanged in non-BRCA1-mutated, non-BRCA2-mutated and BRCA2-mutated ovarian cancer compared to their normal tissues; BRCA1 repression (BRCA1 mutation or BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation) ovarian cancer showed decreased GR levels compared to normal tissue; there was a positive correlation between BRCA1 and GR expression in human ovarian cancer specimens; BRCA1 knockdown was effective at inhibiting GR expression, and overexpression of BRCA1 induces an increase in GR levels in ovarian cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that GR may be a potential target for BRCA1 in ovarian cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Fang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Da Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Chen Cao
- Department of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Chun-Yan Li
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Ting-Ting Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abdel-Hafiz HA, Horwitz KB. Post-translational modifications of the progesterone receptors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014; 140:80-9. [PMID: 24333793 PMCID: PMC3923415 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2013] [Revised: 11/30/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Progesterone plays a key role in the development, differentiation and maintenance of female reproductive tissues and has multiple non-reproductive neural functions. Depending on the cell and tissue, the hormonal environment, growth conditions and the developmental stage, progesterone can either stimulate cell growth or inhibit it while promoting differentiation. Progesterone receptors (PRs) belong to the steroid hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. PR proteins are subject to extensive post-translational modifications that include phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination and SUMOylation. The interplay among these modifications is complex with alteration of the receptors by one factor influencing the impact of another. Control over these modifications is species-, tissue- and cell-specific. They in turn regulate multiple functions including PR stability, their subcellular localization, protein-protein interactions and transcriptional activity. These complexities may explain how tissue- and gene-specific differences in regulation are achieved in the same organism, by the same receptor protein and hormone. Here we review current knowledge of PR post-translational modifications and discuss how these may influence receptor function focusing on human breast cancer cells. There is much left to be learned. However, our understanding of this may help to identify therapeutic agents that target PR activity in tissue-specific, even gene-specific ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hany A Abdel-Hafiz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Kathryn B Horwitz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Pathology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Liu B, Li DA, Guan YF. BRCA1 regulates insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor levels in ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 2014; 7:1733-1737. [PMID: 24765210 PMCID: PMC3997726 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.1929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2013] [Accepted: 02/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) are critical in ovarian cancer progression. However, the crosstalk between the BRCA1 and IGF1R signaling pathways in ovarian cancer remains largely unknown. The effects of BRCA1 on IGF1R were assessed in 121 serous ovarian cancer patients (BRCA1 mutation, n=30; non-BRCA1 mutation, n=32; hypermethylated BRCA1 promoter, n=28; and non-methylation, n=31). BRCA1 promoter methylation was analyzed via bisulfite sequencing using primers focused on the core promoter region. The expression levels of BRCA1 and IGF1R were assessed by immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Knockdown and overexpression of BRCA1 were achieved using a lentiviral vector in 293T and SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells, and primary non-mutated and BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancer cells. The present study demonstrated that IGF1R expression is increased in non-BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancer when compared with adjacent normal tissue. Furthermore, IGF1R levels are additionally significantly elevated in BRCA1 inactivation ovarian cancer (BRCA1 mutation or hypermethylated BRCA1 promoter). In addition, BRCA1 knockdown was found to be an effective method of activating IGF1R expression in non-BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancer cells. The observations of the current study indicate that BRCA1 may be a potential trigger that is involved in the transcriptional regulation of IGF1R in the development of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, P.R. China
| | - DA Li
- Experimental Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Fu Guan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhou W, Slingerland JM. Links between oestrogen receptor activation and proteolysis: relevance to hormone-regulated cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2014; 14:26-38. [PMID: 24505618 DOI: 10.1038/nrc3622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Oestrogen receptor-α (ERα) is a master transcription factor that regulates cell proliferation and homeostasis in many tissues. Despite beneficial ERα functions, sustained oestrogenic exposure increases the risk and/or the progression of various cancers, including those of the breast, endometrium and ovary. Oestrogen–ERα interaction can trigger post-translational ERα modifications through crosstalk with signalling pathways to promote transcriptional activation and ubiquitin-mediated ERα proteolysis, with co-activators that have dual roles as ubiquitin ligases. These processes are reviewed herein. The elucidation of mechanisms whereby oestrogen drives both ERα transactivation and receptor proteolysis might have important therapeutic implications not only for breast cancer but also potentially for other hormone-regulated cancers.
Collapse
|
36
|
Li D, Bi FF, Cao JM, Cao C, Li CY, Yang Q. Effect of BRCA1 on epidermal growth factor receptor in ovarian cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013; 32:102. [PMID: 24321281 PMCID: PMC4029425 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 12/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both BRCA1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) play a critical role in ovarian cancer progression. However, the crosstalk between BRCA1 and EGFR signaling pathways in ovarian cancer remains largely unknown. METHODS The effect of BRCA1 on EGFR was assessed in 146 serous ovarian cancer patients (28 pairs of BRCA1-mutated or not, 23 pairs of BRCA2-mutated or not, and 22 pairs with hypermethylated BRCA1 promoter or not). BRCA1 promoter methylation was analyzed by bisulfite sequencing using primers flanking the core promoter region. Expression levels of BRCA1 and EGFR were assessed by immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. The knockdown and overexpression of BRCA1 were achieved using a lentiviral vector in 293 T cells, SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells, and primary non-mutated and BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancer cells. RESULTS EGFR expression was increased in all cancer tissues compared to normal tissues. Additionally, EGFR expression was higher in normal tissues of BRCA1-mutated patients, and was further increased in cancer tissues; EGFR levels were also significantly elevated in ovarian cancer with promoter hypermethylation-mediated inactivation of BRCA1. BRCA1 knockdown was an effective way to activate EGFR expression in ovarian cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that BRCA1 may be a potential trigger in transcriptional regulation of EGFR in the development of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Fang-Fang Bi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, China
| | - Ji-Min Cao
- Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Chen Cao
- Department of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Chun-Yan Li
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guerrero J, Alfaro IE, Gómez F, Protter AA, Bernales S. Enzalutamide, an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, induces tumor regression in a mouse model of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 2013; 73:1291-305. [PMID: 23765603 DOI: 10.1002/pros.22674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2012] [Accepted: 03/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enzalutamide (formerly MDV3100 and available commercially as Xtandi), a novel androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitor, blocks the growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in cellular model systems and was shown in a clinical study to increase survival in patients with metastatic CRPC. Enzalutamide inhibits multiple steps of AR signaling: binding of androgens to AR, AR nuclear translocation, and association of AR with DNA. Here, we investigate the effects of enzalutamide on AR signaling, AR-dependent gene expression and cell apoptosis. METHODS The expression of AR target gene prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was measured in LnCaP and C4-2 cells. AR nuclear translocation was assessed in HEK-293 cells stably transfected with AR-yellow fluorescent protein. The in vivo effects of enzalutamide were determined in a mouse xenograft model of CRPC. Differential gene expression in LNCaP cells was measured using Affymetrix human genome microarray technology. RESULTS We found that unlike bicalutamide, enzalutamide lacked AR agonistic activity at effective doses and did not induce PSA expression or AR nuclear translocation. Additionally, it is more effective than bicalutamide at inhibiting agonist-induced AR nuclear translocation. Enzalutamide induced the regression of tumor volume in a CRPC xenograft model and apoptosis in AR-over-expressing prostate cancer cells. Finally, gene expression profiling in LNCaP cells indicated that enzalutamide opposes agonist-induced changes in genes involved in processes such as cell adhesion, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that enzalutamide efficiently inhibits AR signaling, and we suggest that its lack of AR agonist activity may be important for these effects.
Collapse
|
38
|
Check JH, Cohen R. The role of progesterone and the progesterone receptor in human reproduction and cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2013; 8:469-484. [PMID: 30754194 DOI: 10.1586/17446651.2013.827380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Insufficient progesterone, effect possibly more on immune factors rather than adequate endometrial development, can be an easy remedial cause of infertility by simply supplementing the luteal phase with either vaginal or intramuscular or oral (dydrogesterone) progesterone. Progesterone will also help to reduce miscarriage rates when follicle maturing drugs are used for those with regular menses but follicular maturation defects, or women with recurrent miscarriages. One mechanism of action seems to be related to production of an immunomodulatory protein, the progesterone-induced blocking factor either in the cytoplasm or in the circulation. PIBF inhibits cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Cancer cells may 'borrow' the same mechanism to escape NK cell immunosurveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome H Check
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Rachael Cohen
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shabbeer S, Omer D, Berneman D, Weitzman O, Alpaugh A, Pietraszkiewicz A, Metsuyanim S, Shainskaya A, Papa MZ, Yarden RI. BRCA1 targets G2/M cell cycle proteins for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Oncogene 2012; 32:5005-16. [PMID: 23246971 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2011] [Revised: 09/25/2012] [Accepted: 10/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein heterodimerizes with its partner protein, BARD1, via the RING domain present in both proteins. The heterodimer contains an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and participates in multiple cellular functions such as cell cycle control, DNA repair and regulation of gene transcription, collectively aimed at maintaining genomic stability and tumor suppression. Yet, the precise role of BRCA1 E3 ligase in these cellular functions is poorly understood. We present data showing that BRCA1 ubiquitinates G2/M cell cycle proteins, cyclin B and Cdc25C, leading to their accelerated degradation via a mechanism that is independent of APC/C. BRCA1-dependent degradation of cyclin B and Cdc25C is reversed by proteasome inhibitors and is enhanced following DNA damage, which may represent a possible mechanism to prevent cyclin B and Cdc25C accumulation, a requirement for mitotic entry. Our data provide mechanistic insight into how BRCA1 E3 ligase activity regulates the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint and, thus, contributes to maintenance of genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Shabbeer
- 1] Department of Human Science, SNHS, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA [2] Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Clark SL, Rodriguez AM, Snyder RR, Hankins GDV, Boehning D. Structure-Function Of The Tumor Suppressor BRCA1. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2012; 1. [PMID: 22737296 PMCID: PMC3380633 DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201204005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1, a multi-domain protein, is mutated in a large percentage of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 is most often mutated in three domains or regions: the N-terminal RING domain, exons 11-13, and the BRCT domain. The BRCA1 RING domain is responsible for the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of BRCA1 and mediates interactions between BRCA1 and other proteins. BRCA1 ubiquitinates several proteins with various functions. The BRCA1 BRCT domain binds to phosphoproteins with specific sequences recognized by both BRCA1 and ATM/ATR kinases. Structural studies of the RING and BRCT domains have revealed the molecular basis by which cancer causing mutations impact the functions of BRCA1. While no structural data is available for the amino acids encoded by exons 11-13, multiple binding sites and functional domains exist in this region. Many mutations in exons 11-13 have deleterious effects on the function of these domains. In this mini-review, we examine the structure-function relationships of the BRCA1 protein and the relevance to cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena L Clark
- Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77550
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Maxwell CA, Benítez J, Gómez-Baldó L, Osorio A, Bonifaci N, Fernández-Ramires R, Costes SV, Guinó E, Chen H, Evans GJR, Mohan P, Català I, Petit A, Aguilar H, Villanueva A, Aytes A, Serra-Musach J, Rennert G, Lejbkowicz F, Peterlongo P, Manoukian S, Peissel B, Ripamonti CB, Bonanni B, Viel A, Allavena A, Bernard L, Radice P, Friedman E, Kaufman B, Laitman Y, Dubrovsky M, Milgrom R, Jakubowska A, Cybulski C, Gorski B, Jaworska K, Durda K, Sukiennicki G, Lubiński J, Shugart YY, Domchek SM, Letrero R, Weber BL, Hogervorst FBL, Rookus MA, Collee JM, Devilee P, Ligtenberg MJ, van der Luijt RB, Aalfs CM, Waisfisz Q, Wijnen J, van Roozendaal CEP, HEBON, EMBRACE, Easton DF, Peock S, Cook M, Oliver C, Frost D, Harrington P, Evans DG, Lalloo F, Eeles R, Izatt L, Chu C, Eccles D, Douglas F, Brewer C, Nevanlinna H, Heikkinen T, Couch FJ, Lindor NM, Wang X, Godwin AK, Caligo MA, Lombardi G, Loman N, Karlsson P, Ehrencrona H, von Wachenfeldt A, SWE-BRCA, Bjork Barkardottir R, Hamann U, Rashid MU, Lasa A, Caldés T, Andrés R, Schmitt M, Assmann V, Stevens K, Offit K, Curado J, Tilgner H, Guigó R, Aiza G, Brunet J, Castellsagué J, Martrat G, et alMaxwell CA, Benítez J, Gómez-Baldó L, Osorio A, Bonifaci N, Fernández-Ramires R, Costes SV, Guinó E, Chen H, Evans GJR, Mohan P, Català I, Petit A, Aguilar H, Villanueva A, Aytes A, Serra-Musach J, Rennert G, Lejbkowicz F, Peterlongo P, Manoukian S, Peissel B, Ripamonti CB, Bonanni B, Viel A, Allavena A, Bernard L, Radice P, Friedman E, Kaufman B, Laitman Y, Dubrovsky M, Milgrom R, Jakubowska A, Cybulski C, Gorski B, Jaworska K, Durda K, Sukiennicki G, Lubiński J, Shugart YY, Domchek SM, Letrero R, Weber BL, Hogervorst FBL, Rookus MA, Collee JM, Devilee P, Ligtenberg MJ, van der Luijt RB, Aalfs CM, Waisfisz Q, Wijnen J, van Roozendaal CEP, HEBON, EMBRACE, Easton DF, Peock S, Cook M, Oliver C, Frost D, Harrington P, Evans DG, Lalloo F, Eeles R, Izatt L, Chu C, Eccles D, Douglas F, Brewer C, Nevanlinna H, Heikkinen T, Couch FJ, Lindor NM, Wang X, Godwin AK, Caligo MA, Lombardi G, Loman N, Karlsson P, Ehrencrona H, von Wachenfeldt A, SWE-BRCA, Bjork Barkardottir R, Hamann U, Rashid MU, Lasa A, Caldés T, Andrés R, Schmitt M, Assmann V, Stevens K, Offit K, Curado J, Tilgner H, Guigó R, Aiza G, Brunet J, Castellsagué J, Martrat G, Urruticoechea A, Blanco I, Tihomirova L, Goldgar DE, Buys S, John EM, Miron A, Southey M, Daly MB, BCFR, Schmutzler RK, Wappenschmidt B, Meindl A, Arnold N, Deissler H, Varon-Mateeva R, Sutter C, Niederacher D, Imyamitov E, Sinilnikova OM, Stoppa-Lyonne D, Mazoyer S, Verny-Pierre C, Castera L, de Pauw A, Bignon YJ, Uhrhammer N, Peyrat JP, Vennin P, Fert Ferrer S, Collonge-Rame MA, Mortemousque I, GEMO Study Collaborators, Spurdle AB, Beesley J, Chen X, Healey S, kConFab, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Vidal M, Gruber SB, Lázaro C, Capellá G, McGuffog L, Nathanson KL, Antoniou AC, Chenevix-Trench G, Fleisch MC, Moreno V, Pujana MA. Interplay between BRCA1 and RHAMM regulates epithelial apicobasal polarization and may influence risk of breast cancer. PLoS Biol 2011; 9:e1001199. [PMID: 22110403 PMCID: PMC3217025 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001199] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Differentiated mammary epithelium shows apicobasal polarity, and loss of tissue organization is an early hallmark of breast carcinogenesis. In BRCA1 mutation carriers, accumulation of stem and progenitor cells in normal breast tissue and increased risk of developing tumors of basal-like type suggest that BRCA1 regulates stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the function of BRCA1 in this process and its link to carcinogenesis remain unknown. Here we depict a molecular mechanism involving BRCA1 and RHAMM that regulates apicobasal polarity and, when perturbed, may increase risk of breast cancer. Starting from complementary genetic analyses across families and populations, we identified common genetic variation at the low-penetrance susceptibility HMMR locus (encoding for RHAMM) that modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA1, but probably not BRCA2, mutation carriers: n = 7,584, weighted hazard ratio ((w)HR) = 1.09 (95% CI 1.02-1.16), p(trend) = 0.017; and n = 3,965, (w)HR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.16), p(trend) = 0.43; respectively. Subsequently, studies of MCF10A apicobasal polarization revealed a central role for BRCA1 and RHAMM, together with AURKA and TPX2, in essential reorganization of microtubules. Mechanistically, reorganization is facilitated by BRCA1 and impaired by AURKA, which is regulated by negative feedback involving RHAMM and TPX2. Taken together, our data provide fundamental insight into apicobasal polarization through BRCA1 function, which may explain the expanded cell subsets and characteristic tumor type accompanying BRCA1 mutation, while also linking this process to sporadic breast cancer through perturbation of HMMR/RHAMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A. Maxwell
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Javier Benítez
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Rare Diseases, Spain
| | - Laia Gómez-Baldó
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Rare Diseases, Spain
| | - Núria Bonifaci
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
- Biomarkers and Susceptibility Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ricardo Fernández-Ramires
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Rare Diseases, Spain
| | - Sylvain V. Costes
- Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Elisabet Guinó
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
- Biomarkers and Susceptibility Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Helen Chen
- Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gareth J. R. Evans
- Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pooja Mohan
- Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Isabel Català
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Anna Petit
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Helena Aguilar
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Alberto Villanueva
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Alvaro Aytes
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jordi Serra-Musach
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomarkers and Susceptibility Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Gad Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center and B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Flavio Lejbkowicz
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center and B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and IFOM Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carla B. Ripamonti
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and IFOM Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Experimental Oncology 1, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Anna Allavena
- Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Loris Bernard
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, and Consortium for Genomics Technology (Cogentech), Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and IFOM Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Bella Kaufman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yael Laitman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Maya Dubrovsky
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Roni Milgrom
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Bohdan Gorski
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Jaworska
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Durda
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Sukiennicki
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Yin Yao Shugart
- Unit of Statistical Genetics, Division of Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Richard Letrero
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Barbara L. Weber
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Frans B. L. Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matti A. Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Margriet Collee
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob B. van der Luijt
- Department of Clinical Molecular Genetics, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cora M. Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Quinten Waisfisz
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juul Wijnen
- Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - HEBON
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Group, the Netherlands
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Peock
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Cook
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Oliver
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- The Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Chu
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Douglas
- Institute of Human Genetics, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomas Heikkinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Noralane M. Lindor
- Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America
| | - Maria A. Caligo
- Section of Genetic Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Grazia Lombardi
- Section of Genetic Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niklas Loman
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - SWE-BRCA
- Swedish Breast Cancer Study, Sweden
| | | | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Muhammad U. Rashid
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany, and Department of Basic Sciences, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Adriana Lasa
- Genetic Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Trinidad Caldés
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Andrés
- Medical Oncology Division, Hospital Clínico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Michael Schmitt
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Volker Assmann
- Center for Experimental Medicine, Institute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Stevens
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - João Curado
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Group, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Biomedical Research Park of Barcelona (PRBB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Hagen Tilgner
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Group, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Biomedical Research Park of Barcelona (PRBB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Roderic Guigó
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Group, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Biomedical Research Park of Barcelona (PRBB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Gemma Aiza
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Genetic Counseling and Hereditary Cancer Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joan Castellsagué
- Genetic Counseling and Hereditary Cancer Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Catalonia, Spain
| | - Griselda Martrat
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ander Urruticoechea
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Blanco
- Genetic Counseling and Hereditary Cancer Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Saundra Buys
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Esther M. John
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California, United States of America
| | - Alexander Miron
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Melissa Southey
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic (MEGA) Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - BCFR
- Breast Cancer Family Registry, United States of America
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Helmut Deissler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Evgeny Imyamitov
- N. N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Olga M. Sinilnikova
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Equipe labellisée LIGUE 2008, UMR5201 CNRS, Centre Léon Bérard, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonne
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- Equipe labellisée LIGUE 2008, UMR5201 CNRS, Centre Léon Bérard, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Carole Verny-Pierre
- Equipe labellisée LIGUE 2008, UMR5201 CNRS, Centre Léon Bérard, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Castera
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Antoine de Pauw
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Yves-Jean Bignon
- Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Université de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nancy Uhrhammer
- Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Université de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Peyrat
- Laboratoire d'Oncologie Moléculaire Humaine, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Philippe Vennin
- Consultation d'Oncogénétique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Sandra Fert Ferrer
- Laboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôtel Dieu Centre Hospitalier, Chambéry, France
| | - Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame
- Service de Génétique-Histologie-Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - GEMO Study Collaborators
- GEMO Study (Genetics Network “Groupe Génétique et Cancer”), Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, France
| | | | | | - Xiaoqing Chen
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sue Healey
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | - kConFab
- The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Marc Vidal
- Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB) and Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Stephen B. Gruber
- Department of Internal Medicine, Epidemiology, Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Genetic Counseling and Hereditary Cancer Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Catalonia, Spain
| | - Gabriel Capellá
- Genetic Counseling and Hereditary Cancer Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IdIBGi), Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Markus C. Fleisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecologie, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Víctor Moreno
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
- Biomarkers and Susceptibility Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Miguel Angel Pujana
- Translational Research Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
- Biomarkers and Susceptibility Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|