Frequency and distinctive spectrum of KRAS mutations in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma

Spatial iTME analysis of KRAS mutant NSCLC and immunotherapy outcome

We conducted spatial immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) profiling using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 25 KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including 12 responders and 13 non-responders. An eleven-marker panel (CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD68, arginase-1, CD33, HLA-DR, pan-keratin (PanCK), PD-1, and PD-L1) was used to study the tumor and immune cell compositions. Spatial features at single cell level with cellular neighborhoods and fractal analysis were determined. Spatial features and different subgroups of CD68+ cells and FOXP3+ cells being associated with response or resistance to ICIs were also identified. In particular, CD68+ cells, CD33+ and FOXP3+ cells were found to be associated with resistance. Interestingly, there was also significant association between non-nuclear expression of FOXP3 being resistant to ICIs. We identified CD68dim cells in the lung cancer tissues being associated with improved responses, which should be insightful for future studies of tumor immunity.

Current perspectives of KRAS in non-small cell lung cancer

NSCLC has a diverse genomic background with mutations in key proto-oncogenic drivers including Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Roughly 40% of adenocarcinoma harbor Kras activating mutations regardless of smoking history. Most KRAS mutations are located at G12, which include G12C (roughly 40%), G12V (roughly 20%), and G12D (roughly 15%). KRAS mutated NSCLC have higher tumor mutational burden and some have increased PD-1 expression, which has resulted in better responses to immunotherapy than other oncogenes. While initial treatment for metastatic NSCLC still relies on chemo-immunotherapy, directly targeting KRAS has proven to be efficacious in treating patients with KRAS mutated metastatic NSCLC. To date, two G12C inhibitors have been FDA-approved, namely sotorasib and adagrasib. In this review, we summarize the different drug combinations used to target KRAS G12c, upcoming G12D inhibitors and novel therapies targeting KRAS.

The clinical features and prognostic implications of the co-mutated TP53 gene in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

TP53 is a frequently mutated oncogene within non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of co-mutations in TP53 in patients with advanced NSCLC has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 174 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to sequencing analysis of tumor-related genes and information such as PD-L1 expression, TMB, and co-mutation changes were collected. Patients were categorized into TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups according to their TP53 mutation status and then statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

TP53 mutations were the most common among all patients, accounting for 56.32%, followed by epidermal growth factor receptor mutations at 48.27%. The most common mutation sites in the TP53 mutation group were exons 5-8.TP53 mutations were significantly associated with PD-L1 and TMB levels. Univariate Cox analysis showed that gender and EGFR mutation affected the prognosis of TP53-mutated NSCLC patients, and multivariate Cox regression analysis identified EGFR mutation as an independent risk factor. The OS of NSCLC patients in the TP53 mutation group was significantly shorter than that of the TP53wt group. Survival curves in the TP53/EGFR combined mutation group showed that patients with combined EGFR mutation had a lower survival rate.

DISCUSSION

TP53 mutations are associated with different clinical indicators and have important implications in clinical treatment. TP53 is a poor prognostic factor for NSCLC patients, and TP53/EGFR co-mutation will affect the survival time of patients. TP53/EGFR co-mutation may be a new prognostic marker for NSCLC.

Cellular Origins and Lineage Plasticity in Cancer

All cancers arise from normal cells whose progeny acquire the cancer-initiating mutations and epigenetic modifications leading to frank tumorigenesis. The identity of those "cells-of-origin" has historically been a source of controversy across tumor types, as it has not been possible to witness the dynamic events giving rise to human tumors. Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of cancer provide an invaluable substitute, enabling researchers to interrogate the competence of various naive cellular compartments to initiate tumors in vivo. Researchers using these models have relied on lineage-specific promoters, knowledge of preneoplastic disease states in humans, and technical advances allowing more precise manipulations of the mouse germline. These approaches have given rise to the emerging view that multiple lineages within a given organ may generate tumors with similar histopathology. Here, we review some of the key studies leading to this conclusion in solid tumors and highlight the biological and clinical ramifications.

Unlocking the future of cancer diagnosis - promises and challenges of ctDNA-based liquid biopsies in non-small cell lung cancer

The advent of liquid biopsies has brought significant changes to the diagnosis and monitoring of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), presenting both promise and challenges. Molecularly targeted drugs, capable of enhancing survival rates, are now available to around a quarter of NSCLC patients. However, to ensure their effectiveness, precision diagnosis is essential. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis as the most advanced liquid biopsy modality to date offers a non-invasive method for tracking genomic changes in NSCLC. The potential of ctDNA is particularly rooted in its ability to furnish comprehensive (epi-)genetic insights into the tumor, thereby aiding personalized treatment strategies. One of the key advantages of ctDNA-based liquid biopsies in NSCLC is their ability to capture tumor heterogeneity. This capability ensures a more precise depiction of the tumor's (epi-)genomic landscape compared to conventional tissue biopsies. Consequently, it facilitates the identification of (epi-)genetic alterations, enabling informed treatment decisions, disease progression monitoring, and early detection of resistance-causing mutations for timely therapeutic interventions. Here we review the current state-of-the-art in ctDNA-based liquid biopsy technologies for NSCLC, exploring their potential to revolutionize clinical practice. Key advancements in ctDNA detection methods, including PCR-based assays, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and digital PCR (dPCR), are discussed, along with their respective strengths and limitations. Additionally, the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis in guiding treatment decisions, monitoring treatment response, detecting minimal residual disease, and identifying emerging resistance mechanisms is examined. Liquid biopsy analysis bears the potential of transforming NSCLC management by enabling non-invasive monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease and providing early indicators for response to targeted treatments including immunotherapy. Furthermore, considerations regarding sample collection, processing, and data interpretation are highlighted as crucial factors influencing the reliability and reproducibility of ctDNA-based assays. Addressing these challenges will be essential for the widespread adoption of ctDNA-based liquid biopsies in routine clinical practice, ultimately paving the way toward personalized medicine and improved outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

Precision medicine for pancreatic cancer: Characterizing the clinico-genomic landscape and outcomes of KRAS G12C-mutated disease

BACKGROUND

Mutated KRAS is the most common oncogene alteration in pancreatic cancer (PDAC), and KRAS G12C mutations (KRAS G12Cmut) are observed in 1-2%. Several inhibitors of KRAS G12C have recently demonstrated promise in solid tumors, including PDAC. Little is known regarding clinical, genomics and outcome data of this population.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC and KRAS G12Cmut were identified at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), and via the AACR Project GENIE database. Clinical, treatment, genomic and outcomes data were analysed. A cohort of patients at MSK with non-G12C KRAS PDAC was included for comparison.

RESULTS

Among 3,571 patients with PDAC, 39 with KRAS G12Cmut were identified (1.1%). Median age was 67 years, 56% were female. Median BMI was 29.2 kg/m2, 67% had a smoking history. Median OS 13 months (9.4, not reached (NR)) for stage IV, and 26 months (23, NR) for stage I-III. Complete genomic data (via AACR GENIE) was available for N = 74. Most common co-alterations included: TP53 (73%), CDKN2A (33%), SMAD4 (28%), and ARID1A (21%). Compared with a large cohort (N = 2931) of non-G12C KRAS-mutated PDAC, ARID1A co-mutations were more frequent in KRAS G12Cmut (P < .05). OS did not differ between KRAS G12Cmut and non-G12C KRAS PDAC. Germline pathogenic variants were identified in 17%. N = 2 received KRAS G12C-directed therapy.

CONCLUSION

PDAC and KRAS G12Cmut may be associated with a distinct clinical phenotype. Genomic features are similar to non-G12C KRAS-mutated PDAC, although enrichment of ARID1A co-mutations was observed. Targeting of KRAS G12C in PDAC provides a precedent for broader KRAS targeting in PDAC.

Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations in Relation to PDL1 Expression and Immunotherapy Treatment in Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Greek Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Factors that could predict which patients will benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of KRAS biomarker in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to clinical characteristics, treatment response and PDL1 expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 100 patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy as 1st line treatment. In biopsy samples, the PDL1 biomarker expression rate and somatic mutations of KRAS gene were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 67 ± 8 years. Patients were all male and 66% were found with adenocarcinoma whereas 34% with squamous cell carcinoma. The KRAS G12C mutation was found with the highest percentage (73%). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, patients with PDL1 > 49% in combination with a negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 40 months compared to patients with a positive KRAS result (9 months, p < 0.05). In addition, patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, PDL1 < 49% and negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 39 months compared to patients with a positive result (28 months, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the presence of KRAS mutations in advanced NSCLC patients has a poor prognostic value, regardless of their PDL1 expression values, after receiving immunotherapy as first-line treatment.

Clinical genomic profiling of malignant giant cell tumor of bone: A retrospective analysis using a real‑world database

Malignant giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is identified by the presence of multinucleated giant cells, with an aggressive behavior and a high risk of metastasis, which has not been genetically characterized in detail. H3 histone family member 3A (H3F3A) gene mutations are highly recurrent and specific in GCTB. The present study analyzed the clinical information and genomic sequencing data of eight cases of malignant GCTB (out of 384 bone sarcoma samples) using an anonymized genomic database. There were 5 males and 3 females among the cases, with a median age of 33 years at the time of the initial diagnosis. H3F3A G34W and G34L mutations were detected in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively. In 75% of cases without H3F3A mutation, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway gene alterations were found (KRAS single nucleotide variant, KRAS amplification, nuclear respiratory factor 1-BRAF fusion). Moreover, the collagen type I alpha 2 chain-ALK fusion was detected in remaining one case. The most frequent gene alterations were related to cell cycle regulators, including TP53, RB1, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B and cyclin E1 (75%, 6 of 8 cases). On the whole, the present study discovered recurrent MAPK signaling gene alterations or other gene alterations in cases of malignant GCTB. Of note, two fusion genes should be carefully validated following the pathology re-review by sarcoma pathologists. These two fusion genes may be detected in resembling tumors, which contain giant cells, apart from malignant GCTB. The real-world data used herein provide a unique perspective on genomic alterations in clinicopathologically diagnosed malignant GCTB.

Emerging trends in the coexistence of primary lung Cancer and hematologic malignancy: a comprehensive analysis of clinicopathological features and genetic abnormalities

BACKGROUND

The incidence of multiple primary cancers (MPC), especially involving primary lung cancer (PLC) and primary hematologic malignancies (PHM), is rising. This study aims to analyze clinicopathological features, gene abnormalities, and prognostic outcomes in individuals diagnosed with PLC-PHM MPC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 89 patients diagnosed with PLC-PHM MPC at the Respiratory or Hematology Departments of Ruijin Hospital from 2003 to 2022 (a total of 842,047 people). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) assessed lung cancer specimens, while Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and NGS were used for hematologic malignancy specimens. Statistical analysis involved survival analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

PLC-PHM MPC incidence surged from 1.67 per year (2011-2013) to 16.3 per year (2020-2022). The primary demographic for PLC-PHM MPC consists predominantly of elderly (average age 66 years) males (59.6%), with a high prevalence of metachronous MPC (89.9%). The prevailing histological types were lung adenocarcinoma (70.8%) in lung cancer (LC) and mature B-cell lymphomas (50.6%) in hematologic malignancies (HM). Notably, in a molecular testing cohort of 38 LC patients, 84.2% of lung cancer cases exhibited driver mutations, in which EGFR mutations frequence prevalent was 74.2%. In total group of 85 cases achieved a median overall survival (mOS) of 46.2 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 37.9% and advanced LC patients with LC gene mutations achieved a mOS was 52.6 months, with a 5-year OS rate of 30.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line treatment of 11 advanced patients with lung cancer-associated driver gene mutations is 26.6 months. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a favorable OS associated with surgery for LC, favorable PS score, adenocarcinoma pathology of LC, and the presence of genetic abnormalities associated with HM.

CONCLUSION

PLC-PHM MPC incidence is rising, characterized by a significant proportion of lung adenocarcinoma and a high prevalence of positive driver genes, especially in EGFR. Despite suffering from two primary tumors, the PLC-PHM MPC patients had superior data of both PFS and OS, suggesting an inherently intricate background of genetic abnormalities between the two kinds of tumors.

Clinical characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors in KRAS mutant lung cancers: experience from a tertiary care cancer center in India

Objectives

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutations in lung cancers, long considered untargetable, have had a recent rise in interest due to promising data of agents targeting KRAS p.G12C. As Indian data are scarce, we sought to identify baseline clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and outcomes of lung cancer patients with KRAS mutations at our hospital.

Methods

Patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers treated at our institute from 2016 to 2022 were analysed.

Results

133 patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers were identified. Median age was 57 (interquartile range 28-78) years, and 58 (43.6%) were smokers. 17 (12.7%) had brain metastases. The commonest variant was p.G12C, seen in 53 (39.8%) patients. Six (4.5%) had programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1) expression >50% by Ventana SP263 PDL-1 assay, and 13 (9.7%) had epidermal growth factor mutation. Of 92 patients with available treatment details, the majority received intravenous chemotherapy, nine (9.8%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors and four (4.4%) received immunotherapy (pembrolizumab). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-9.2) months and median overall survival (OS) was 12 (CI 9.2-14.8) months. The incidence of brain metastases was higher in patients with G12C mutations (p = 0.025). Brain metastases (HR: 3.57, p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (HR: 2.13, p = 0.002) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.84, p = 0.011) were associated with inferior PFS, while brain metastases (HR: 4.6, p < 0.001), PS ≥ 2 (HR: 2.33, p = 0.001) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.93, p = 0.01) were associated with inferior OS.

Conclusion

This is the largest dataset of KRAS mutant lung cancers from India. Brain metastases were higher in patients with G12C mutations and associated with poorer PFS and OS. G12C mutation and PS ≥ 2 were also associated with inferior PFS and OS. Experience with targeted therapy for KRAS mutations remains an area of future exploration due to the unavailability of these agents in India.

Targeting KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways for immunomodulation and improving treatment outcomes in solid tumors

Historically, KRAS has been considered 'undruggable' inspite of being one of the most frequently altered oncogenic proteins in solid tumors, primarily due to the paucity of pharmacologically 'druggable' pockets within the mutant isoforms. However, pioneering developments in drug design capable of targeting the mutant KRAS isoforms especially KRASG12C-mutant cancers, have opened the doors for emergence of combination therapies comprising of a plethora of inhibitors targeting different signaling pathways. SHP2 signaling pathway, primarily known for activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as KRAS has come up as a potential target for such combination therapies as it emerged to be the signaling protein connecting KRAS and the immune signaling pathways and providing the link for understanding the overlapping regions of RAS/ERK/MAPK signaling cascade. Thus, SHP2 inhibitors having potent tumoricidal activity as well as role in immunomodulation have generated keen interest in researchers to explore its potential as combination therapy in KRAS mutant solid tumors. However, the excitement with these combination therapies need to overcome challenges thrown up by drug resistance and enhanced toxicity. In this review, we will discuss KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways and their roles in immunomodulation and regulation of tumor microenvironment and also analyze the positive effects and drawbacks of the different combination therapies targeted at these signaling pathways along with their present and future potential to treat solid tumors.

Inhibition of ULK1/2 and KRAS G12C controls tumor growth in preclinical models of lung cancer

Mutational activation of KRAS occurs commonly in lung carcinogenesis and, with the recent FDA approval of covalent inhibitors of KRAS G12C such as sotorasib or adagrasib, KRAS oncoproteins are important pharmacological targets in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all KRAS G12C -driven NSCLCs respond to these inhibitors, and the emergence of drug resistance in those patients that do respond can be rapid and pleiotropic. Hence, based on a backbone of covalent inhibition of KRAS G12C , efforts are underway to develop effective combination therapies. Here we report that inhibition of KRAS G12C signaling increases autophagy in KRAS G12C expressing lung cancer cells. Moreover, the combination of DCC-3116, a selective ULK1/2 inhibitor, plus sotorasib displays cooperative/synergistic suppression of human KRAS G12C -driven lung cancer cell proliferation in vitro and superior tumor control in vivo . Additionally, in genetically engineered mouse models of KRAS G12C -driven NSCLC, inhibition of either KRAS G12C or ULK1/2 decreases tumor burden and increases mouse survival. Consequently, these data suggest that ULK1/2-mediated autophagy is a pharmacologically actionable cytoprotective stress response to inhibition of KRAS G12C in lung cancer.

Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Obesity shapes selection for driver mutations in cancer

Obesity is a leading risk factor for cancer, but whether obesity is linked to specific genomic subtypes of cancer is unknown. Here, we examined the relationship between obesity and tumor genotype in two large clinicogenomic corpora. Obesity was associated with specific driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, and cancers of unknown primary, independent of clinical covariates and genetic ancestry. Obesity is therefore a putative driver of etiologic heterogeneity across cancers.

Prognostic value of KRAS G12C mutation in lung adenocarcinoma stratified by stages and radiological features

OBJECTIVES

The role of KRAS G12C is of particular interest given the promising clinical activity of KRAS G12C-specific inhibitors. This study comprehensively investigated the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of KRAS G12C mutation in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Data were collected on 3828 patients with completely resected primary lung adenocarcinomas who underwent KRAS mutation analysis between 2008 and 2020. The association between KRAS G12C and clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular profiles, recurrence patterns, and postoperative outcome were explored.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-five patients (7.2%) were confirmed to harbor a KRAS mutation, of whom 83 (30.2%) had the G12C subtype. KRAS G12C was more frequent in men, former/current smokers, radiologic solid nodules, invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma, and solid predominant tumors. KRAS G12C tumors had more lymphovascular invasion and higher programmed death-ligand 1 expression than KRAS wild-type tumors. TP53 (36.8%), STK11 (26.3%), and RET (18.4%) mutations were the 3 most frequent in the KRAS G12C group. Logistic regression analysis showed patients with KRAS G12C mutation were prone to experience early recurrence and locoregional recurrence. KRAS G12C mutation was found to be significantly associated with poor survival after propensity score matching. Stratified analysis showed that the KRAS G12C was an independent prognostic factor in stage I tumors and part-solid lesions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The KRAS G12C mutation had a significant prognostic value in stage I lung adenocarcinomas as well as in part-solid tumors. Furthermore, it exhibited a potentially aggressive phenotype associated with early and locoregional recurrence. These findings might be relevant as better KRAS treatments are developed for clinical application.

An Updated Review on KRAS Mutation in Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Its Effects on Human Health

The largest cause of cancer-related fatalities worldwide is lung cancer. In its early stages, lung cancer often exhibits no signs or symptoms. Its signs and symptoms often appear when the condition is advanced. The Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene homolog is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes found in non-small cell lung cancer. Patients who have these mutations may do worse than those who do not, in terms of survival. To understand the nuances in order to choose the best treatment options for each patient, including combination therapy and potential resistance mechanisms, given the quick development of pharmaceuticals, it is necessary to know the factors that might contribute to this disease. It has been observed that single nucleotide polymorphisms altering let-7 micro-RNA might impact cancer propensity. On the other hand, gefitinib fails to stop the oncogenic protein from directly interacting with phosphoinositide3-kinase, which may explain its resistance towards cancer cells. Additionally, Atorvastatin may be able to overpower gefitinib resistance in these cancer cells that have this mutation regardless of the presence of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha. De novo lipogenesis is also regulated by this virus. To overcome these effects, several targeted therapies have been proposed. One such therapy is to use inhibitors of focal adhesion kinases. When this is inhibited, viral oncogene mutant cancers are effectively stopped because it functions downstream of the virus. Mutant oncoproteins like epidermal growth factor receptor may depend on Heat Shock protein90 chaperones more frequently than they do on natural counterparts that make it more attractive therapeutic target for this virus. Inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway is frequent in lung cancer, and fabrication of inhibitors against this pathway can also be an effective therapeutic strategy. Blocking programmed cell death ligand1 is another therapy that may help T cells to recognize and eliminate cancerous cells. This homolog is a challenging therapeutic target due to its complex structural makeup and myriad biological characteristics. Thanks to the unrelenting efforts of medical research, with the use of some inhibitors, immunotherapy, and other combination methods, this problem is currently expected to be overcome.

The prognostic impact of KRAS, TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations and their influence on the NLR in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

PD-L1 expression is used to predict NSCLC response to ICIs, but its performance is suboptimal. The impact of KRAS mutations in these patients is unclear. Studies evaluating co-mutations in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 as well as the NLR showed that they may predict the benefit of ICIs.

PATIENTS & METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs at the CHUM between July 2015 and June 2020. OS and PFS were compared using Kaplan-Meier and logrank methods. Co-mutations in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 as well as the NLR were accounted for. ORR and safety were compared using Wald method.

RESULTS

From 100 patients with known KRAS status, 50 were mutated (KRASMut). Mutation in TP53, STK11 and KEAP1 were present, and their status known in, respectively, 19/40 (47.5 %), 8/39 (20.5 %) and 4/38 (10.5 %) patients. STK11Mut and KEAP1Mut were associated with shorter overall survival when compared with wild type tumors (respectively median OS of 3.3 vs 20.4, p = 0.0001 and 10.1 vs 17.7, p = 0.24). When KRAS status was compounded with STK11/KEAP1, KRASMut trended to a better prognosis in STK11+KEAP1WT tumors (median OS 21.1 vs 15.8 for KRASWT, p = 0.15), but not for STK11+/-KEAP1Mut tumors. The NLR was strongly impacted by STK11 (6.0Mutvs 3.6WT, p = 0.014) and TP53 (3.2Mutvs 4.8WT, p = 0.048), but not by KEAP1 or KRAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

STK11Mut and KEAP1Mut are adverse predictors of ICI therapy benefit. The NLR is strongly impacted by STK11Mut but not by KEAP1Mut, suggesting differences in their resistance mechanism. In STK11-KEAP1WT tumors, KRASMut seem associated with improved survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

MICROABSTRACT

Response of NSCLC to immunotherapy is not easily predictable. We conducted a retrospective study in 100 patients with NSCLC and a known KRAS status. By accounting for different co-mutations, KRAS mutation was found to be associated with a better median overall survival in STK11 and KEAP1 wild-type tumors (21.1 vs 15.8, p = 0.15). NLR was impacted by STK11, but not KEAP1 mutation, suggesting a difference in their resistance mechanism.

KRAS G12C in advanced NSCLC: Prevalence, co-mutations, and testing

KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in advanced, non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Western countries. Of the various KRAS mutants, KRAS G12C is the most common variant (~40%), representing 10-13% of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Recent regulatory approvals of the KRASG12C-selective inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring KRASG12C have transformed KRAS into a druggable target. In this review, we explore the evolving role of KRAS from a prognostic to a predictive biomarker in advanced NSCLC, discussing KRAS G12C biology, real-world prevalence, clinical relevance of co-mutations, and approaches to molecular testing. Real-world evidence demonstrates significant geographic differences in KRAS G12C prevalence (8.9-19.5% in the US, 9.3-18.4% in Europe, 6.9-9.0% in Latin America, and 1.4-4.3% in Asia) in advanced NSCLC. Additionally, the body of clinical data pertaining to KRAS G12C co-mutations such as STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 is increasing. In real-world evidence, KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC was associated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 co-mutations in 10.3-28.0%, 6.3-23.0%, and 17.8-50.0% of patients, respectively. Whilst sotorasib and adagrasib are currently approved for use in the second-line setting and beyond for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, testing and reporting of the KRAS G12C variant should be included in routine biomarker testing prior to first-line therapy. KRAS G12C test results should be clearly documented in patients' health records for actionability at progression. Where available, next-generation sequencing is recommended to facilitate simultaneous testing of potentially actionable biomarkers in a single run to conserve tissue. Results from molecular testing should inform clinical decisions in treating patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Chemical remodeling of a cellular chaperone to target the active state of mutant KRAS

The discovery of small-molecule inhibitors requires suitable binding pockets on protein surfaces. Proteins that lack this feature are considered undruggable and require innovative strategies for therapeutic targeting. KRAS is the most frequently activated oncogene in cancer, and the active state of mutant KRAS is such a recalcitrant target. We designed a natural product-inspired small molecule that remodels the surface of cyclophilin A (CYPA) to create a neomorphic interface with high affinity and selectivity for the active state of KRASG12C (in which glycine-12 is mutated to cysteine). The resulting CYPA:drug:KRASG12C tricomplex inactivated oncogenic signaling and led to tumor regressions in multiple human cancer models. This inhibitory strategy can be used to target additional KRAS mutants and other undruggable cancer drivers. Tricomplex inhibitors that selectively target active KRASG12C or multiple RAS mutants are in clinical trials now (NCT05462717 and NCT05379985).

Let-7a Downregulation Accompanied by KRAS Mutation Is Predictive of Lung Cancer Onset in Cigarette Smoke-Exposed Mice

BACKGROUND

Let-7 is a tumor suppressor microRNA targeting the KRAS lung oncogene. Let-7a downregulation is reversible during the early stages of lung carcinogenesis but is irreversible in cancer cells. The aim of this study is to shed light on the relationship between oncogene (KRAS) mutation and let-7a downregulation in cigarette smoke (CS)-induced lung carcinogenesis.

METHODS

A total of 184 strain H Swiss albino mice were either unexposed (control) or exposed to CS for 2 weeks (short CS) or 8 months (long CS). After 8 months, the lungs were individually collected. The following end points have been evaluated: (a) DNA methylation of the let-7a gene promoter by bisulphite-PCR and pyrosequencing; (b) let-7a expression by qPCR; (c) KRAS mutation by DNA pyrosequencing; (d) cancer incidence by histopathological examination.

RESULTS

let-7a expression decreased by 8.3% in the mice exposed to CS for two weeks (CS short) and by 33.4% (p ≤ 0.01) in the mice exposed to CS for 8 months (CS long). No significant difference was detected in the rate of let-7a-promoter methylation between the Sham-exposed mice (55.1%) and the CS short-(53%) or CS long (51%)-exposed mice. The percentage of G/T transversions in KRAS codons 12 and 13 increased from 2.3% (Sham) to 6.4% in CS short- and to 11.5% in CS long-exposed mice. Cancer incidence increased significantly in the CS long-exposed mice (11%) as compared to both the Sham (4%) and the CS short-exposed (2%) mice. In the CS long-exposed mice, the correlation between let-7a expression and the number of KRAS mutations was positive (R = +0.5506) in the cancer-free mice and negative (R = -0.5568) in the cancer-bearing mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of CS-induced mutations in KRAS are neutralized by the high expression of let-7a in cancer-free mice (positive correlation) but not in cancer-bearing mice where an irreversible let-7a downregulation occurs (negative correlation). This result provides evidence that both genetic (high load of KRAS mutation) and epigenetic alterations (let-7a irreversible downregulation) are required to produce lung cancer in CS-exposed organisms.

Clinical and Genomic Features of Response and Toxicity to Sotorasib in a Real-World Cohort of Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

With the recent approval of the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib for patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a new need to identify factors associated with activity and toxicity among patients treated in routine practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with sotorasib outside of clinical trials to identify factors associated with real-world progression free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC treated with sotorasib, treatment led to a 5.3-month median rwPFS, 12.6-month median OS, and 28% real-world response rate. KEAP1 comutations were associated with shorter rwPFS and OS (rwPFS hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P = .004; OS HR, 4.10; P = .003); no significant differences in rwPFS or OS were observed across TP53 (rwPFS HR, 1.10; P = .731; OS HR, 1.19; P = .631) or STK11 (rwPFS HR, 1.66; P = .098; OS HR, 1.73; P = .168) comutation status. Notably, almost all patients who developed grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (G3+ TRAEs) had previously been treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Among these patients, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure within 12 weeks of sotorasib was strongly associated with G3+ TRAEs (P < .001) and TRAE-related sotorasib discontinuation (P = .014). Twenty-eight percent of patients with recent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure experienced G3+ TRAEs, most commonly hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Among patients treated with sotorasib in routine practice, KEAP1 comutations were associated with resistance and recent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure was associated with toxicity. These observations may help guide use of sotorasib in the clinic and may help inform the next generation of KRAS G12C-targeted clinical trials.

Real-world outcomes in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel in second-line or beyond

INTRODUCTION

The KRAS G12C mutation has recently become a druggable target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this observational study, we present real-world clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes data in patients with KRAS mutation-positive advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), including those with KRAS G12C and KRAS non-G12C mutations, who received docetaxel as standard-of-care treatment in the second-line and beyond (2L+).

METHODS

US-based electronic health record-derived de-identified databases were used to assess clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in adult aNSCLC patients with KRAS mutations treated with 2L+ docetaxel between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2021. The primary endpoints were median real-world overall survival OS (rwOS) and median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), which were estimated in 2L, third-line, fourth-line, and 2L+ analysis sets among patients who had a 6-month minimum opportunity for follow-up and were not taking a clinical trial drug.

RESULTS

Of the 677 patients with KRAS-mutant aNSCLC (KRAS mutant cohort) treated with 2L+ docetaxel, 295 (43.6%) had KRAS G12C mutation (KRAS G12C cohort) and 382 (56.4%) had KRAS non-G12C mutation (KRAS non-G12C cohort). Across all cohorts, approximately 47%, 35%, 14-15%, and 6-9% of patients received 2L, third-line, fourth-line, and fifth- or later-line docetaxel, respectively. In the KRAS G12C cohort, ∼68% of patients were treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor prior to 2L+ docetaxel. Most 2L+ docetaxel regimens in the KRAS G12C cohort were combinations (59.5%), primarily with ramucirumab (45.2%). In the KRAS G12C cohort, the median rwOS and median rwPFS after 2L+ docetaxel were 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9-7.1) and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.7-4.2) months, respectively, with similar trends observed in other cohorts and lines of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world outcomes were poor in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated aNSCLC treated with 2L+ docetaxel. Targeted and more efficacious treatment options in these patients are warranted.

Cancer driver mutations: predictions and reality

Cancer cells accumulate many genetic alterations throughout their lifetime, but only a few of them drive cancer progression, termed driver mutations. Driver mutations may vary between cancer types and patients, can remain latent for a long time and become drivers at particular cancer stages, or may drive oncogenesis only in conjunction with other mutations. The high mutational, biochemical, and histological tumor heterogeneity makes driver mutation identification very challenging. In this review we summarize recent efforts to identify driver mutations in cancer and annotate their effects. We underline the success of computational methods to predict driver mutations in finding novel cancer biomarkers, including in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We also report on the boundaries of their applicability in clinical research.

Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer

Oncogenes that occur in ≤5% of non-small-cell lung cancers have been defined as 'rare'; nonetheless, this frequency can correspond to a substantial number of patients diagnosed annually. Within rare oncogenes, less commonly identified alterations (such as HRAS, NRAS, RIT1, ARAF, RAF1 and MAP2K1 mutations, or ERBB family, LTK and RASGRF1 fusions) can share certain structural or oncogenic features with more commonly recognized alterations (such as KRAS, BRAF, MET and ERBB family mutations, or ALK, RET and ROS1 fusions). Over the past 5 years, a surge in the identification of rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers has challenged the boundaries of traditional clinical grade diagnostic assays and profiling algorithms. In tandem, the number of approved targeted therapies for patients with rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer has risen dramatically. Rational drug design has iteratively improved the quality of small-molecule therapeutic agents and introduced a wave of antibody-based therapeutics, expanding the list of actionable de novo and resistance alterations in lung cancer. Getting additional molecularly tailored therapeutics approved for rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers in a larger range of countries will require ongoing stakeholder cooperation. Patient advocates, health-care agencies, investigators and companies with an interest in diagnostics, therapeutics and real-world evidence have already taken steps to surmount the challenges associated with research into low-frequency drivers.

Experimental mouse models for translational human cancer research

The development and growth of tumors remains an important and ongoing threat to human life around the world. While advanced therapeutic strategies such as immune checkpoint therapy and CAR-T have achieved astonishing progress in the treatment of both solid and hematological malignancies, the malignant initiation and progression of cancer remains a controversial issue, and further research is urgently required. The experimental animal model not only has great advantages in simulating the occurrence, development, and malignant transformation mechanisms of tumors, but also can be used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of a diverse array of clinical interventions, gradually becoming an indispensable method for cancer research. In this paper, we have reviewed recent research progress in relation to mouse and rat models, focusing on spontaneous, induced, transgenic, and transplantable tumor models, to help guide the future study of malignant mechanisms and tumor prevention.

Treatment Strategies for KRAS-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Activating mutations in KRAS are highly prevalent in solid tumours and are frequently found in 35% of lung, 45% of colorectal, and up to 90% of pancreatic cancers. Mutated KRAS is a prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC and is associated with a more aggressive clinical phenotype, highlighting the need for KRAS-targeted therapy. Once considered undruggable due to its smooth shallow surface, a breakthrough showed that the activated G12C-mutated KRAS isozyme can be directly inhibited via a newly identified switch II pocket. This discovery led to the development of a new class of selective small-molecule inhibitors against the KRAS G12C isoform. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Currently, there are at least twelve KRAS G12C inhibitors being tested in clinical trials, either as a single agent or in combination. In this study, KRAS mutation prevalence, subtypes, rates of occurrence in treatment-resistant invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMAs), and novel drug delivery options are reviewed. Additionally, the current status of KRAS inhibitors, multiple resistance mechanisms that limit efficacy, and their use in combination treatment strategies and novel multitargeted approaches in NSCLC are discussed.

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4-20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3-7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0-5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51-0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

FUNDING

Amgen.

KRAS-targeted therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

KRAS mutations are one of the most common driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Though previously believed to be an undruggable target, recent advances in therapeutics have seen new targeted agents against KRAS mutations. The objective of this article is to review currently available and upcoming KRAS-targeted treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Currently available trials examining KRAS-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer were examined by searching for the keyword "KRAS inhibitors." The pivotal trials for sotorasib and adagrasib were reviewed for this article.

DATA SUMMARY

Mutated KRAS can be challenging to target for a variety of reasons. In 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved sotorasib for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutation as determined by a Food and Drug Administration-approved test, who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. A multicenter, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial was able to demonstrate that sotorasib was able to demonstrate objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in this patient population. A phase 3 trial comparing sotorasib to docetaxel in the subsequent-line treatment of KRAS G12C non-small cell lung cancer is currently ongoing. There are other KRAS-targeted agents currently under study, including adagrasib, with growing interest in targeting KRAS downstream pathways.

CONCLUSION

Further trials need to be conducted in order to identify other targeted agents for KRAS and the appropriate place in therapy among currently approved treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Large-scale clinico-genomic profile of non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia study

INTRODUCTION

KRAS G12C is an oncogenic driver mutation, accounting for approximately 14% of Caucasian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several KRAS G12C-targeted drugs have been developed; however, the clinico-genomic characteristics of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the large-scale prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia) database, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C were evaluated.

RESULTS

From March 2015 to March 2021, 10,023 NSCLC patients were enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia. KRAS mutations were detected in 1258 patients (14 %), including G12C in 376 (4.0 %), G12D in 289 (3.1 %) and G12V in 251 (2.7 %). The proportions of males and smokers were higher in patients with KRAS G12C than in those with KRAS non-G12C mutations (males: 73 % vs 63 %, p < 0.001; smokers: 89 % vs 76 %, p < 0.001). KRAS G12C-positive tumors showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (mean, 8.1 mut/Mb, p < 0.001) and a higher percentage of tumors with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50 % (52 %, p = 0.08). The overall survival in patients with KRAS G12C (median, 24.6 months) was not different between patients with other mutation subtypes (G12V: 18.2 months, p = 0.23; G12D: 20.6 months, p = 0.65; other KRAS mutations: 18.3 months, p = 0.20). Among KRAS-mutated patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the progression-free survival in G12C-positive patients (median, 3.4 months) was similar to that in G12V-positive patients (4.2 months, p = 0.90), but significantly longer than that in G12D- (2.0 months, p = 0.02) and other KRAS mutation-positive patients (2.5 months, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequencies of KRAS G12C were lower in Asian than in Caucasian NSCLC patients. Among the KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients, G12C-positive tumors showed increased immunogenicity, such as high TMB and high PD-L1 expression, and potential sensitivity to ICIs.

Somatic mutation but not aneuploidy differentiates lung cancer in never-smokers and smokers

Lung cancer in never-smokers disproportionately affects older women. To understand the mutational landscape of this cohort, we performed detailed genome characterization of 73 lung adenocarcinomas from participants of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). We find enrichment of EGFR mutations in never-/light-smokers and KRAS mutations in heavy smokers as expected, but we also show that the specific variants of these genes differ by smoking status, with important therapeutic implications. Mutational signature analysis revealed signatures of clock, APOBEC, and DNA repair deficiency in never-/light-smokers; however, the mutational load of these signatures did not differ significantly from those found in smokers. Last, tumors from both smokers and never-/light-smokers shared copy number subtypes, with no significant differences in aneuploidy. Thus, the genomic landscape of lung cancer in never-/light-smokers and smokers is predominantly differentiated by somatic mutations and not copy number alterations.

Development and characterization of reference materials for EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ALK, and MET genetic testing

BACKGROUND

Along with the dramatic development of molecular diagnostic testing for the detection of oncogene variations, reference materials (RMs) have become increasingly important in performance evaluation of genetic testing.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we built a set of RMs for genetic testing based on next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHOD

Solid tumor tissues were selected as the samples of RMs for preparation. NGS was used to determine and validate the variants and the mutation frequency in DNA samples. Digital PCR was used to determine the copy numbers of RNA samples. The performance of the RMs was validated by six laboratories.

RESULTS

Thirty common genetic alterations were designed based on these RMs. RMs consisted of a positive reference, a limit of detection reference, and a negative reference. The validation results confirmed the performance of the RMs.

CONCLUSION

These RMs may be an attractive tool for the development, validation, and quality monitoring of molecular genetic testing.

CodeBreak 200: Sotorasib Has Not Broken the KRASG12C Enigma Code

Thirteen percent of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are estimated to have the KRAS G12C mutation. Sotorasib is a novel KRAS G12C inhibitor that has shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies, granting its conditional approval by the FDA in May 2021. The phase I clinical trial resulted in a confirmed response of 32% and progression free survival (PFS) of 6.3 months while the phase II trial resulted in a confirmed response of 37.1% and a PFS of 6.8 months. It was also shown to be tolerable with most subjects experiencing grade one or two adverse events, most commonly diarrhea and nausea. The CodeBreaK 200 phase III trial data have recently resulted and showed an improved PFS with the use of sotorasib at 5.6 months compared to that of standard docetaxel of 4.5 months in locally advanced or unresectable metastatic KRAS G12C NSCLC previously treated with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor. The lower than expected PFS of sotorasib from the phase III trial opens up opportunities for other G12C inhibitors to join the field. Indeed, adagrasib, another G12C inhibitor just recently gained FDA accelerated approval in NSCLC patients based on the KRYSTAL-1 study where the response rate was 43% with a median duration of response of 8.5 months. With novel agents and combinations, the field of KRAS G12C is quickly evolving. While sotorasib was an exciting start, there is more to do to break the KRAS G12C Enigma code.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer

For advanced metastatic non-small-lung cancer, the landscape of actionable driver alterations is rapidly growing, with nine targetable oncogenes and seven approvals within the last 5 years. This accelerated drug development has expanded the reach of targeted therapies, and it may soon be that a majority of patients with lung adenocarcinoma will be eligible for a targeted therapy during their treatment course. With these emerging therapeutic options, it is important to understand the existing data on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with their efficacy and safety for each oncogene-driven lung cancer, to best guide the selection and sequencing of various therapeutic options. This article reviews the clinical data on ICIs for each of the driver oncogene defined lung cancer subtypes, including efficacy, both for ICI as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or radiation; toxicities from ICI/targeted therapy in combination or in sequence; and potential strategies to enhance ICI efficacy in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancers.

Metabolic targeting, immunotherapy and radiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Where do we go from here?

In the US, there are ~250,000 new lung cancer diagnoses and ~130,000 deaths per year, and worldwide there are an estimated 1.6 million deaths per year from this deadly disease. Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, and it accounts for roughly a quarter of all cancer deaths in the US. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80-85% of these cases. Due to an enormous tobacco cessation effort, NSCLC rates in the US are decreasing, and the implementation of lung cancer screening guidelines and other programs have resulted in a higher percentage of patients presenting with potentially curable locoregional disease, instead of distant disease. Exciting developments in molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy have resulted in dramatic improvement in patients' survival, in combination with new surgical, pathological, radiographical, and radiation techniques. Concurrent platinum-based doublet chemoradiation therapy followed by immunotherapy has set the benchmark for survival in these patients. However, despite these advances, ~50% of patients diagnosed with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) survive long-term. In patients with local and/or locoregional disease, chemoradiation is a critical component of curative therapy. However, there remains a significant clinical gap in improving the efficacy of this combined therapy, and the development of non-overlapping treatment approaches to improve treatment outcomes is needed. One potential promising avenue of research is targeting cancer metabolism. In this review, we will initially provide a brief general overview of tumor metabolism as it relates to therapeutic targeting. We will then focus on the intersection of metabolism on both oxidative stress and anti-tumor immunity. This will be followed by discussion of both tumor- and patient-specific opportunities for metabolic targeting in NSCLC. We will then conclude with a discussion of additional agents currently in development that may be advantageous to combine with chemo-immuno-radiation in NSCLC.

Non-genetic adaptive resistance to KRASG12C inhibition: EMT is not the only culprit

Adaptions to therapeutic pressures exerted on cancer cells enable malignant progression of the tumor, culminating in escape from programmed cell death and development of resistant diseases. A common form of cancer adaptation is non-genetic alterations that exploit mechanisms already present in cancer cells and do not require genetic modifications that can also lead to resistance mechanisms. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one of the most prevalent mechanisms of adaptive drug resistance and resulting cancer treatment failure, driven by epigenetic reprogramming and EMT-specific transcription factors. A recent breakthrough in cancer treatment is the development of KRASG12C inhibitors, which herald a new era of therapy by knocking out a unique substitution of an oncogenic driver. However, these highly selective agents targeting KRASG12C, such as FDA-approved sotorasib (AMG510) and adagrasib (MRTX849), inevitably encounter multiple mechanisms of drug resistance. In addition to EMT, cancer cells can hijack or rewire the sophisticated signaling networks that physiologically control cell proliferation, growth, and differentiation to promote malignant cancer cell phenotypes, suggesting that inhibition of multiple interconnected signaling pathways may be required to block tumor progression on KRASG12C inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment (TME) of cancer cells, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), contribute significantly to immune escape and tumor progression, suggesting a therapeutic approach that targets not only cancer cells but also the TME. Deciphering and targeting cancer adaptions promises mechanistic insights into tumor pathobiology and improved clinical management of KRASG12C-mutant cancer. This review presents recent advances in non-genetic adaptations leading to resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors, with a focus on oncogenic pathway rewiring, TME, and EMT.

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

BACKGROUND

KRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS "undruggability", and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.

RESULTS

In the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician's choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

Differential properties of KRAS transversion and transition mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: associations with environmental factors and clinical outcomes

Background

KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 23–35% and 13–20% of all NSCLCs in white patients and East Asians, respectively, and is therefore regarded as a major therapeutic target. However, its epidemiology and clinical characteristics have not been fully elucidated because of its wide variety of mutational subtypes. Here, we focused on two distinct base substitution types: transversion mutations and transition mutations, as well as their association with environmental factors and clinical outcome.

Methods

Dataset from the Japan Molecular Epidemiology Study, which is a prospective, multicenter, and molecular study epidemiology cohort study involving 957 NSCLC patients who underwent surgery, was used for this study. Questionnaire-based detailed information on clinical background and lifestyles was also used to assess their association with mutational subtypes. Somatic mutations in 72 cancer-related genes were analyzed by next-generation sequencing, and KRAS mutations were classified into three categories: transversions (G > C or G > T; G12A, G12C, G12R, G12V), transitions (G > A; G12D, G12S, G13D), and wild-type (WT). Clinical correlations between these subtypes have been investigated, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Results

Of the 957 patients, KRAS mutations were detected in 80 (8.4%). Of these, 61 were transversions and 19 were transitions mutations. Both pack-years of smoking and smoking duration had significant positive correlation with the occurrence of transversion mutations (p = 0.03 and < 0.01, respectively). Notably, transitions showed an inverse correlation with vegetable intake (p = 0.01). Patients with KRAS transitions had the shortest RFS and OS compared to KRAS transversions and WT. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS transitions, along with age and stage, were significant predictors of shorter RFS and OS (HR 2.15, p = 0.01; and HR 2.84, p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

Smoking exposure positively correlated with transversions occurrence in a dose-dependent manner. However, vegetable intake negatively correlated with transitions. Overall, KRAS transition mutations are significantly poor prognostic factors among resected NSCLC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10246-7.

Evaluating Real World Mutational Differences Between Hispanics and Asians in NSCLC at a Large Academic Institution in Los Angeles

INTRODUCTION

Hispanics living in the United States have higher rates of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations compared with Non-Hispanic Whites. While this higher incidence is like Asian patients living in the United States, the outcomes for Hispanic patients differ. We looked to compare the variances in mutational profiles between Hispanics and Asians in Los Angeles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred ninety three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC + USC) Medical Center and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center who received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) were evaluated from July 2017 to August 2020. CGP was done using tissue biopsies (n = 211) from Caris Life Sciences and liquid biopsies (n = 231) from Guardant Health. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the role of race between Hispanics and Asians.

RESULTS

In the Hispanic cohort (n = 90), 50.0% were male, median age of diagnosis was 62, 54.5% were non-smokers, and 85.5% had adenocarcinoma. In Asians (n = 142), 47.5% were male, median age of diagnosis was 65, 59.6% were non-smokers, and 83.8% had adenocarcinoma. Hispanic patients had greater prevalence of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutations (odds ratio [OR] 4.42, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.63-12.83) and lesser prevalence of EGFR mutations (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.59). There were a greater proportion of Hispanic smokers with KRAS mutations (14/41; 34.1%) than Asian smokers (4/58; 6.9%).

CONCLUSION

We saw a greater percentage of Hispanics with KRAS mutations despite similar smoking percentages along with a greater percentage of Asians with EGFR mutations. This study shows that ethnic and racial backgrounds of the patient can influence the effects of potentially carcinogenic exposures leading to variances of mutation frequency of NSCLC among different ethnicities.

Emerging genetic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma

Comprehensive genomic profiling is a next-generation sequencing approach used to detect several known and emerging genomic alterations. Many genomic variants detected by comprehensive genomic profiling have become recognized as significant cancer biomarkers, leading to the development of major clinical trials. Lung adenocarcinoma has become one of the most targeted cancers for genomic profiling with a series of actionable mutations such as EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, FGFR, MET, ALK, and many others. The importance of these mutations lies in establishing targeted therapies that significantly change the outcome in lung adenocarcinoma besides the prognostic value of some mutations. This review sheds light on the development of the comprehensive genomic profiling field, mainly lung adenocarcinoma, and discusses the role of a group of mutations in this disease.

An evaluation of sotorasib for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutations

INTRODUCTION

Improving the clinical outcomes of patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of whom are current or former smokers, has been a barrier to improving population-level outcomes in NSCLC. Novel, effective KRAS^G12C inhibitors are emerging and sotorasib is the first member of that class to achieve commercial availability.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we survey the epidemiology of KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC, as well as sotorasib's chemistry, pharmacology, and clinical trial data.

EXPERT OPINION

While sotorasib's development has been unique and exciting, questions persist regarding its intracranial penetrance, optimal dose, and efficacy relative to standard-of-care therapy. Improvements in the clinical activity of KRAS inhibition will hinge on better understanding of resistance mechanisms, the development of broad-spectrum inhibitors with activity beyond G12C mutations, and combination therapy targeting multiple mediators of KRAS signaling and alternative pathways. From a regulatory perspective, sotorasib's development may, in time, prove to be an instructive example for early-phase clinical trialists and regulators focused on dose optimization.

Dissecting the clinicopathologic, genomic, and immunophenotypic correlates of KRASG12D-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Allele-specific KRAS inhibitors are an emerging class of cancer therapies. KRAS-mutant (KRASMUT) non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) exhibit heterogeneous outcomes, driven by differences in underlying biology shaped by co-mutations. In contrast to KRASG12C NSCLC, KRASG12D NSCLC is associated with low/never-smoking status and is largely uncharacterized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic and genomic information were collected from patients with NSCLCs harboring a KRAS mutation at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Imperial College of London. Multiplexed immunofluorescence for CK7, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Foxp3, and CD8 was carried out on a subset of samples with available tissue at the DFCI. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition ± chemotherapy were analyzed according to KRAS mutation subtype.

RESULTS

Of 2327 patients with KRAS-mutated (KRASMUT) NSCLC, 15% (n = 354) harbored KRASG12D. Compared to KRASnon-G12D NSCLC, KRASG12D NSCLC had a lower pack-year (py) smoking history (median 22.5 py versus 30.0 py, P < 0.0001) and was enriched in never smokers (22% versus 5%, P < 0.0001). KRASG12D had lower PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) (median 1% versus 5%, P < 0.01) and lower tumor mutation burden (TMB) compared to KRASnon-G12D (median 8.4 versus 9.9 mt/Mb, P < 0.0001). Of the samples which underwent multiplexed immunofluorescence, KRASG12D had lower intratumoral and total CD8+PD1+ T cells (P < 0.05). Among 850 patients with advanced KRASMUT NSCLC who received PD-(L)1-based therapies, KRASG12D was associated with a worse objective response rate (ORR) (15.8% versus 28.4%, P = 0.03), progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-2.00, P = 0.003], and overall survival (OS; HR 1.45, 1.05-1.99, P = 0.02) to PD-(L)1 inhibition alone but not to chemo-immunotherapy combinations [ORR 30.6% versus 35.7%, P = 0.51; PFS HR 1.28 (95%CI 0.92-1.77), P = 0.13; OS HR 1.36 (95%CI 0.95-1.96), P = 0.09] compared to KRASnon-G12D.

CONCLUSIONS

KRASG12D lung cancers harbor distinct clinical, genomic, and immunologic features compared to other KRAS-mutated lung cancers and worse outcomes to PD-(L)1 blockade. Drug development for KRASG12D lung cancers will have to take these differences into account.

Molecular lung cancer: How targeted therapies and personalized medicine are re-defining cancer care

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is unfortunately still frequently diagnosed in the metastatic setting, where the disease is considered incurable. Nearly 30% of these cancers may be driven by specific mutations that promote tumor growth and proliferation. These mutations are observed more frequently in young patients without significant smoking history and in certain racial and ethnic backgrounds. The past 15 years have marked a revolution for patients with molecularly driven lung cancer as novel, oral, targeted therapies have been developed that demonstrate superior activity with substantially better toxicity profiles in comparison to chemotherapy. Consideration of molecular testing for a driver mutation is imperative for all providers caring for patients with a new suspected lung cancer diagnosis, as discovery of an actionable mutation will have dramatic implications in regards to patient survival and quality of life.

Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Perspectives for K-Ras Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the most common alterations are identified in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, accounting for approximately 30% of cases in Caucasian patients. The majority of mutations are located in exon 2, with the c.34G > T (p.G12C) change being the most prevalent. The clinical relevance of KRAS mutations in NSCLC was not recognized until a few years ago. What is now emerging is a dual key role played by KRAS mutations in the management of NSCLC patients. First, recent data report that KRAS-mutant lung AC patients generally have poorer overall survival (OS). Second, a KRAS inhibitor specifically targeting the c.34G > T (p.G12C) variant, Sotorasib, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency. Another KRAS inhibitor targeting c.34G > T (p.G12C), Adagrasib, is currently being reviewed by the FDA for accelerated approval. From the description of the biology of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the present review will focus on the clinical aspects of KRAS mutations in NSCLC, in particular on the emerging efficacy data of Sotorasib and other KRAS inhibitors, including mechanisms of resistance. Finally, the interaction between KRAS mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be discussed.

Exhaled breath condensate efficacy to identify mutations in patients with lung cancer: A pilot study

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is used to investigate the efficacy of EBC to detect the genetic mutations in patients with lung cancer. Samples of 5 patients and 5 healthy volunteers were collected. DNA was extracted and used for amplification of hotspot regions of TP53 and KRAS genes by using PCR. We performed the mutation analysis by direct sequencing in all subjects. Detected mutations in EBC samples were compared with those of corresponding tumor tissues and there was complete agreement within the detected mutations in EBC and tumorous tissue. EBC can be used as an efficient and noninvasive source for the assessment of gene mutations in patients with lung cancer.

STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Descriptive analysis and prognostic value among Hispanics (STRIKE registry-CLICaP)

BACKGROUND

Mutations in STK11 (STK11^Mut) and, frequently co-occurring, KEAP1 mutations (KEAP1^Mut) are associated with poor survival in metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. However, there are limited data regarding the prognostic or predictive significance of these genomic alterations among Hispanics.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 103) diagnosed with mNSCLC from the US and seven Latin American countries (LATAM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) alone or in combination as first-line (Cohort A). All cases were treated in routine care between January 2016 and December 2021. The main objectives were to determine the association of mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 in these patients' tumors with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), presence of KRAS mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other relevant clinical variables. To compare outcomes with a STK11^Wt/KEAP1^Wt population, historical data from a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 101) treated with first-line ICI was used, matching both groups by country of origin, gender, and Programed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level (Cohort B).

RESULTS

Most tumors had mutations only in STK11 or KEAP1 (45.6%) without KRAS co-mutation or any other genomic alteration. Besides, 35%, 8.7%, 6.8%, and 3.9% were KRAS^Mut + STK11^Mut, KRAS^Mut + STK11^Mut + KEAP1^Mut, STK11^Mut + KEAP1^Mut, and KRAS^Mut + KEAP1^Mut, respectively. Based on KRAS status, STK11 alterations were associated with significantly lower PD-L1 expression among those with KRAS^Wt (p = 0.023), whereas KEAP1 mutations were predominantly associated with lower PD-L1 expression among KRAS^Mut cases (p = 0.047). Tumors with KRAS^Mut + KEAP1^Mut had significantly higher median TMB when compared to other tumors (p = 0.040). For Cohort A, median PFS was 4.9 months (95%CI 4.3-5.4), slightly longer in those with KEAP1^mut 6.1 months versus STK11^Mut 4.7 months (p = 0.38). In the same cohort, PD-L1 expression and TMB did not influence PFS. OS was significantly longer among patients with tumors with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (30.9 months), and different from those with PD-L1 1-49% (22.0 months), and PD-L1 < 1% (12.0 months) (p = 0.0001). When we compared the cohorts A and B, OS was significantly shorter for patients carrying STK1 [STK11^Mut 14.2 months versus STK11^Wt 27.0 months (p = 0.0001)] or KEAP1 [KEAP1^Mut 12.0 months versus KEAP1^Wt 24.4 months (p = 0.005)] mutations. PD-L1 expression significantly affected OS independently of the presence of mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS. TMB-H favored better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large Hispanic cohort to study the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC patient treated with ICI. Our data suggest that mutations in the above-mentioned genes are associated with PD-L1 expression levels and poor OS.

Characteristics and immune checkpoint inhibitor effects on non-smoking non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation: A single center cohort (STROBE-compliant)

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation (KRASm) is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We have aimed to survey NSCLC patients harboring KRASm in Taiwan, where never-smoking lung adenocarcinoma predominates, and analyze the immune checkpoint inhibitor effect on NSCLC harboring KRASm.NSCLC patients with KRASm were enrolled and tested on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using available tissue. We analyzed their clinical features, PD-L1 status, responses to ICIs, and overall survival (OS).We studied 93 patients with a median age 66.0 years, 23.7% of whom were women, and 22.6% were never-smokers. The results showed that G12C (36.6%) was the most common KRASm. In 47 patients with available tissue for PD-L1 testing, PD-L1 expression was positive in 66.0% of patients, while PD-L1 ≥50% was higher in ever-smokers (P = .038). Among 23 patients receiving ICI treatment, those with PD-L1 ≥50% experience a 45.5% response rate to ICI. There were benefits from ICI treatment on OS compared with no ICI treatment (median OS 35.6 vs 9.8 months, P = .002) for all of our patients, and for patients with PD-L1 ≥50% (median OS not-reached vs 8.4 months, P = .008). There were no differences in survival across different KRAS subtypes (P = .666).Never-smokers composed more than one-fifth of KRASm in NSCLC in Taiwan. A high PD-L1 expression was related to smoking history and responded well to ICI. ICI treatment improved the OS in NSCLC patients with KRASm, particularly those with PD-L1 ≥50%.

Brain Metastases Management in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Targeted Therapies Era

The therapeutic landscape in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic biomarkers has radically changed with the development of targeted therapies. Although lung cancers are known to frequently metastasize to the brain, oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer patients show a higher incidence of both brain metastases at baseline and a further risk of central nervous system progression/relapse. Recently, a new generation of targeted agents, highly active in the central nervous system, has improved the control of intracranial disease. The intracranial activity of these drugs poses a crucial issue in determining the optimal management sequence in oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases, with a potential change of paradigm from primary brain irradiation to central nervous system penetrating targeted inhibitors.

Prognostic Significance of the Loss of Heterozygosity of KRAS in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

Lung cancer is a common disease with a poor prognosis. Genomic alterations involving the KRAS gene are common in lung carcinomas, although much is unknown about how different mutations, deletions, and expressions influence the disease course. The first approval of a KRAS-directed inhibitor was recently approved by the FDA. Mutations in the KRAS gene have been associated with poor prognosis for lung adenocarcinomas, but implications of the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of KRAS have not been investigated. In this study, we have assessed the LOH of KRAS in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma by analyzing DNA copy number profiles and have investigated the effect on patient outcome in association with mRNA expression and somatic hotspot mutations. KRAS mutation was present in 36% of cases and was associated with elevated mRNA expression. LOH in KRAS was associated with a favorable prognosis, more prominently in KRAS mutated than in wild-type patients. The presence of both LOH and mutation in KRAS conferred a better prognosis than KRAS mutation alone. For wild-type tumors, no difference in prognosis was observed between patients with and without LOH in KRAS. Our study indicates that LOH in KRAS is an independent prognostic factor that may refine the existing prognostic groups of lung adenocarcinomas.