1
|
Pham J, Cote DJ, Kang K, Briggs RG, Gomez D, Prasad A, Daggupati S, Sisti J, Chow F, Attenello F, Chen CC, Zada G. Treatment practices and survival outcomes for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status: insights from the U.S. National Cancer Database. J Neurooncol 2025; 172:655-665. [PMID: 39907975 PMCID: PMC11968476 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04952-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is an important prognostic marker in glioblastoma (GBM); however, its implementation in clinical practice remains understudied. Here, we assessed the prevalence of MGMT methylation status among GBM patients in the United States. Additionally, we evaluated treatment practices and survival outcomes of GBM patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all adult U.S. patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with IDH-wildtype GBM between 2018 and 2020. Treatment regimen was grouped into no chemotherapy and no radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone (without radiotherapy), radiotherapy alone (without chemotherapy), and chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS A total of 20,734 patients were included, of whom 6,404 (30.9%) had MGMT-methylated GBM, 9,065 (43.7%) had MGMT-unmethylated tumors, and 5,265 (25.4%) had unknown methylation status. The median and three-year overall survival were 12.4 months and 15.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort (16.4 months and 23.9% for MGMT-methylated patients and 11.8 months and 9.8% for MGMT-unmethylated patients, p < 0.001). Chemoradiotherapy was less commonly used for elderly (≥ 70 years, 58.5%) than non-elderly (< 70 years, 79.2%) patients. Among elderly patients, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered than chemotherapy alone for patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (11.2% vs. 2.1%) and MGMT-methylated tumors (6.6% vs. 3.9%). However, chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, p = 0.04) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-methylated tumors, while chemotherapy alone was associated with a higher mortality risk (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09-2.44, p = 0.02) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Patients who were elderly, uninsured, insured through Medicaid, lived in zip codes with lower median education levels, or received care at non-academic programs were less likely to undergo MGMT testing. CONCLUSION A high proportion of GBM patients in the United States undergo MGMT promoter testing, though significant sociodemographic disparities exist. While there was a decrease in chemoradiotherapy use with increasing age, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered to elderly patients than chemotherapy alone irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pham
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - David J Cote
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Keiko Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Robert G Briggs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - David Gomez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Apurva Prasad
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Sindhu Daggupati
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Jonathan Sisti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Frances Chow
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Frank Attenello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pouyan A, Ghorbanlo M, Eslami M, Jahanshahi M, Ziaei E, Salami A, Mokhtari K, Shahpasand K, Farahani N, Meybodi TE, Entezari M, Taheriazam A, Hushmandi K, Hashemi M. Glioblastoma multiforme: insights into pathogenesis, key signaling pathways, and therapeutic strategies. Mol Cancer 2025; 24:58. [PMID: 40011944 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-025-02267-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by a poor prognosis and significant resistance to existing treatments. Despite progress in therapeutic strategies, the median overall survival remains approximately 15 months. A hallmark of GBM is its intricate molecular profile, driven by disruptions in multiple signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt, NF-κB, and TGF-β, critical to tumor growth, invasion, and treatment resistance. This review examines the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic prospects of targeting these pathways in GBM, highlighting recent insights into pathway interactions and discovering new therapeutic targets to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Pouyan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Masoud Ghorbanlo
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoud Eslami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Majid Jahanshahi
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Ziaei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ali Salami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Khatere Mokhtari
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Koorosh Shahpasand
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Najma Farahani
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tohid Emami Meybodi
- Neuroscience Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Maliheh Entezari
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Afshin Taheriazam
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Kiavash Hushmandi
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mehrdad Hashemi
- Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Sciences Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maragno E, Ricchizzi S, Winter NR, Hellwig SJ, Stummer W, Hahn T, Holling M. Predictive modeling with linear machine learning can estimate glioblastoma survival in months based solely on MGMT-methylation status, age and sex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2025; 167:52. [PMID: 39992425 PMCID: PMC11850473 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-025-06441-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Machine Learning (ML) has become an essential tool for analyzing biomedical data, facilitating the prediction of treatment outcomes and patient survival. However, the effectiveness of ML models heavily relies on both the choice of algorithms and the quality of the input data. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel predictive model to estimate individual survival for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM), focusing on key variables such as O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, age, and sex. METHODS To identify the optimal approach, we utilized retrospective data from 218 patients treated at our brain tumor center. The performance of the ML models was evaluated within repeated tenfold regression. The pipeline comprised five regression estimators, including both linear and non-linear algorithms. Permutation feature importance highlighted the feature with the most significant impact on the model. Statistical significance was assessed using a permutation test procedure. RESULTS The best machine learning algorithm achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 12.65 (SD = ± 2.18) and an explained variance (EV) of 7% (SD = ± 1.8%) with p < 0.001. Linear algorithms led to more accurate predictions than non-linear estimators. Feature importance testing indicated that age and positive MGMT-methylation influenced the predictions the most. CONCLUSION In summary, here we provide a novel approach allowing to predict GBM patient's survival in months solely based on key parameters such as age, sex and MGMT-methylation status and underscores MGMT-methylation status as key prognostic factor for GBM patients survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Maragno
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Sarah Ricchizzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, 48149, Münster, Germany
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Nils Ralf Winter
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sönke Josua Hellwig
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Tim Hahn
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Holling
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gough R, Treffy RW, Krucoff MO, Desai R. Advances in Glioblastoma Diagnosis: Integrating Genetics, Noninvasive Sampling, and Advanced Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:124. [PMID: 39796751 PMCID: PMC11720166 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adult patients, and despite standard-of-care treatment, median survival has remained less than two years. Advances in our understanding of molecular mutations have led to changes in the diagnostic criteria of glioblastoma, with the WHO classification integrating important mutations into the grading system in 2021. We sought to review the basics of the important genetic mutations associated with glioblastoma, including known mechanisms and roles in disease pathogenesis/treatment. We also examined new advances in image processing as well as less invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tools that can aid in the diagnosis and surveillance of those undergoing treatment for glioblastoma. Our review is intended to serve as an overview of the current state-of-the-art in the diagnosis and management of glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rupen Desai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (R.G.); (R.W.T.); (M.O.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma B, Agriantonis G, Shafaee Z, Twelker K, Bhatia ND, Kuschner Z, Arnold M, Agcon A, Dave J, Mestre J, Arora S, Ghanta H, Whittington J. Role of Podoplanin (PDPN) in Advancing the Progression and Metastasis of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4051. [PMID: 39682237 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a malignant primary brain tumor categorized as a Grade 4 astrocytic glioma by the World Health Organization (WHO). Some of the established risk factors of GBM include inherited genetic syndromes, body mass index, alcohol consumption, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and therapeutic ionizing radiation. Vascular anomalies, including local and peripheral thrombosis, are common features of GBM. Podoplanin (PDPN), a ligand of the C-type lectin receptor (CLEC-2), promotes platelet activation, aggregation, venous thromboembolism (VTE), lymphatic vessel formation, and tumor metastasis in GBM patients. It is regulated by Prox1 and is expressed in developing and adult mammalian brains. It was initially identified on lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) as the E11 antigen and on fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) of lymphoid organs and thymic epithelial cells as gp38. In recent research studies, its expression has been linked with prognosis in GBM. PDPN-expressing cancer cells are highly pernicious, with a mutant aptitude to form stem cells. Such cells, on colocalization to the surrounding tissues, transition from epithelial to mesenchymal cells, contributing to the malignant carcinogenesis of GBM. PDPN can be used as an independent prognostic factor in GBM, and this review provides strong preclinical and clinical evidence supporting these claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharti Sharma
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - George Agriantonis
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Zahra Shafaee
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Kate Twelker
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Navin D Bhatia
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Zachary Kuschner
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Monique Arnold
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Aubrey Agcon
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
| | - Jasmine Dave
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Juan Mestre
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Shalini Arora
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Hima Ghanta
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jennifer Whittington
- Department of Surgery, NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY 11373, USA
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bomsztyk K, Mar D, Denisenko O, Powell S, Vishnoi M, Yin Z, Delegard J, Hadley C, Tandon N, Patel AJ, Patel AP, Ellenbogen RG, Ramakrishna R, Rostomily RC. Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables. J Transl Med 2024; 104:102160. [PMID: 39426568 PMCID: PMC11709230 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology is driven by biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time-consuming preanalytical steps such as biospecimen storage, fixation, sampling, and processing are sources of data irreproducibility, and all these preanalytical variables are confounded by intratumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of preanalytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multisonicator (PIXUL), and 5-methylcytosine DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix-MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter methylation status assayed by MeDIP-qPCR was validated with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. MGMT promoter methylation levels in frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample pairs were not statistically different, confirming the reliability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded for MGMT promoter methylation analysis. Warm ex vivo ischemia (up to 4 hours at 37 °C) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not statistically impact 5-methylcytosine at MGMT promoter, exon, and enhancer regions, indicating the resistance of DNA methylation to common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. Twenty-six percent to 34% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. These data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have a statistically significant impact on MGMT promoter methylation assessment. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in the evaluation of MGMT promoter methylation status. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (eg, HOXA and lncRNAs) that are resilient to variation in the above preanalytical conditions. These observations offer new opportunities to develop more granular data-based epigenetic GBM biomarkers. In this regard, the high-throughput CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karol Bomsztyk
- UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Matchstick Technologies, Inc, Kirkland, Washington.
| | - Daniel Mar
- UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Oleg Denisenko
- UW Medicine South Lake Union, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Suzanne Powell
- Department of Neuropathology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Monika Vishnoi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Zheng Yin
- Department of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering, Houston Methodist Neil Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer Delegard
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Caroline Hadley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Akash J Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anoop P Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Richard G Ellenbogen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Robert C Rostomily
- Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang J, Xu J, Ji S, Yu X, Chen J. Unraveling the mysteries of MGMT: Implications for neuroendocrine tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2024; 1879:189184. [PMID: 39303858 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells and are commonly found in various organs. A considerable proportion of NET patients were diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage. Alkylating agents are the primary treatment for NET, and O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) remains the first-line of defense against DNA damage caused by these agents. Clinical trials have indicated that MGMT promoter methylation or its low/lacked expression can predict a favorable outcome with Temozolomide in NETs. Its status could help select NET patients who can benefit from alkylating agents. Therefore, MGMT status serves as a biomarker to guide decisions on the efficacy of Temozolomide as a personalized treatment option. Additionally, delving into the regulatory mechanisms of MGMT status can lead to the development of MGMT-targeted therapies, benefiting individuals with high levels of MGMT expression. This review aims to explore the polymorphism of MGMT regulation and summarize its clinical implications in NETs, which would help establish the role of MGMT as a biomarker and its potential as a therapeutic target in NETs. Additionally, we explore the benefits of combining Temozolomide and immunotherapy in MGMT hypermethylated subgroups. Future studies can focus on optimizing Temozolomide administration to induce specific immunomodulatory changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyun Jiang
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Junfeng Xu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Shunrong Ji
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Jie Chen
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hegi ME, Oppong FB, Perry JR, Wick W, Henriksson R, Laperriere NJ, Gorlia T, Malmström A, Weller M. No benefit from TMZ treatment in glioblastoma with truly unmethylated MGMT promoter: Reanalysis of the CE.6 and the pooled Nordic/NOA-08 trials in elderly glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1867-1875. [PMID: 38912869 PMCID: PMC11449086 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of elderly/ frail patients with glioblastoma is a balance between avoiding undue toxicity, while not withholding effective treatment. It remains debated, whether these patients should receive combined chemo-radiotherapy with temozolomide (RT/TMZ→TMZ) regardless of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene promoter (MGMTp) methylation status. MGMT is a well-known resistance factor blunting the treatment effect of TMZ, by repairing the most genotoxic lesion. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMTp sensitizes glioblastoma to TMZ. For risk-adapted treatment, it is of utmost importance to accurately identify patients, who will not benefit from TMZ treatment. METHODS Here, we present a reanalysis of the clinical trials CE.6 and the pooled NOA-08 and Nordic trials in elderly glioblastoma patients that compared RT to RT/TMZ→TMZ, or RT to TMZ, respectively. For 687 patients with available MGMTp methylation data, we applied a cutoff discerning truly unmethylated glioblastoma, established in a pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials for glioblastoma, with RT/TMZ→TMZ treatment, using the same quantitative methylation-specific MGMTp PCR assay. RESULTS When applying this restricted cutoff to the elderly patient population, we confirmed that glioblastoma with truly unmethylated MGMTp derived no benefit from TMZ treatment. In the Nordic/NOA-08 trials, RT was better than TMZ, suggesting little or no benefit from TMZ. CONCLUSIONS For evidence-based treatment of glioblastoma patients validated MGMTp methylation assays should be used that accurately identify truly unmethylated patients. Respective stratified management of patients will reduce toxicity without compromising outcomes and allow testing of more promising treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika E Hegi
- Neurosurgery & Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Felix B Oppong
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - James R Perry
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- DKTK and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Norman J Laperriere
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thierry Gorlia
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Annika Malmström
- Department of Advanced Home Care in Linköping, and Division of Cellbiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sener UT, Sulman EP, Sarkaria JN. Temozolomide use in elderly patients with MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma: Is it finally time to dismount a dead horse? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1876-1877. [PMID: 39081224 PMCID: PMC11449039 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur T Sener
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rahman R, Shi DD, Reitman ZJ, Hamerlik P, de Groot JF, Haas-Kogan DA, D’Andrea AD, Sulman EP, Tanner K, Agar NYR, Sarkaria JN, Tinkle CL, Bindra RS, Mehta MP, Wen PY. DNA damage response in brain tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology consensus review on mechanisms and translational efforts in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1367-1387. [PMID: 38770568 PMCID: PMC11300028 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms are critical to maintenance of overall genomic stability, and their dysfunction can contribute to oncogenesis. Significant advances in our understanding of DDR pathways have raised the possibility of developing therapies that exploit these processes. In this expert-driven consensus review, we examine mechanisms of response to DNA damage, progress in development of DDR inhibitors in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma and IDH-mutant gliomas, and other important considerations such as biomarker development, preclinical models, combination therapies, mechanisms of resistance and clinical trial design considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Diana D Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zachary J Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Petra Hamerlik
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John F de Groot
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan D D’Andrea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kirk Tanner
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nathalie Y R Agar
- Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Christopher L Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ling Z, Pan J, Zhang Z, Chen G, Geng J, Lin Q, Zhang T, Cao S, Chen C, Lin J, Yuan H, Ding W, Xiao F, Xu X, Li F, Wang G, Zhang Y, Li J. Small-molecule Molephantin induces apoptosis and mitophagy flux blockage through ROS production in glioblastoma. Cancer Lett 2024; 592:216927. [PMID: 38697460 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), one of the most malignant brain tumors in the world, has limited treatment options and a dismal survival rate. Effective and safe disease-modifying drugs for glioblastoma are urgently needed. Here, we identified a small molecule, Molephantin (EM-5), effectively penetrated the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and demonstrated notable antitumor effects against GBM with good safety profiles both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, EM-5 not only inhibits the proliferation and invasion of GBM cells but also induces cell apoptosis through the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Furthermore, EM-5 causes mitochondrial dysfunction and blocks mitophagy flux by impeding the fusion of mitophagosomes with lysosomes. It is noteworthy that EM-5 does not interfere with the initiation of autophagosome formation or lysosomal function. Additionally, the mitophagy flux blockage caused by EM-5 was driven by the accumulation of intracellular ROS. In vivo, EM-5 exhibited significant efficacy in suppressing tumor growth in a xenograft model. Collectively, our findings not only identified EM-5 as a promising, effective, and safe lead compound for treating GBM but also uncovered its underlying mechanisms from the perspective of apoptosis and mitophagy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng Ling
- Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine & Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, and State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of TCM and New Drugs Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junping Pan
- Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhongfei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guisi Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of TCM and New Drugs Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiayuan Geng
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Lin
- Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine & Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, and State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuqin Cao
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinrong Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongyao Yuan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weilong Ding
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of TCM and New Drugs Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Xiao
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of TCM and New Drugs Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinke Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangcheng Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guocai Wang
- Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine & Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, and State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yubo Zhang
- Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine & Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, and State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of TCM and New Drugs Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Junliang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Janneh AH. Sphingolipid Signaling and Complement Activation in Glioblastoma: A Promising Avenue for Therapeutic Intervention. BIOCHEM 2024; 4:126-143. [PMID: 38894892 PMCID: PMC11185840 DOI: 10.3390/biochem4020007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive type of malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective treatment options. Therefore, new treatment options are required. Sphingolipids are essential components of the cell membrane, while complement components are integral to innate immunity, and both play a critical role in regulating glioblastoma survival signaling. This review focuses on recent studies investigating the functional roles of sphingolipid metabolism and complement activation signaling in glioblastoma. It also discusses how targeting these two systems together may emerge as a novel therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alhaji H Janneh
- Hollings Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matthaios D, Balgkouranidou I, Neanidis K, Sofis A, Pikouli A, Romanidis K, Pappa A, Karamouzis M, Zygogianni A, Charalampidis C, Zarogoulidis P, Rigas G, Galanis A. Revisiting Temozolomide's role in solid tumors: Old is gold? J Cancer 2024; 15:3254-3271. [PMID: 38817857 PMCID: PMC11134434 DOI: 10.7150/jca.94109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Temozolomide is an imidazotetrazine with a long history in oncology especially for the high grade malignant glioma and metastatic melanoma. However, last year's new indications for its use are added. Its optimum pharmacodynamic profile, its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, the existence of methylation of MGMT in solid tumors which enhances its efficacy, the identification of new agents that can overcome temozolomide's resistance, the promising role of temozolomide in turning immune cold tumors to hot ones, are leading to expand its use in other solid tumors, giving oncologists an additional tool for the treatment of advanced and aggressive neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anastasia Pikouli
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Romanidis
- Second Department of Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Aglaia Pappa
- Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Michael Karamouzis
- Molecular Oncology Unit, Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Paul Zarogoulidis
- Pulmonary-Oncology Department, General Clinic Euromedice, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George Rigas
- Oncology Department, Private General Clinic of Volos, Volos, Greece
| | - Alex Galanis
- Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bomsztyk K, Mar D, Denisenko O, Powell S, Vishnoi M, Delegard J, Patel A, Ellenbogen RG, Ramakrishna R, Rostomily R. Analysis of gliomas DNA methylation: Assessment of pre-analytical variables. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.26.586350. [PMID: 38586048 PMCID: PMC10996653 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.26.586350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Precision oncology is driven by molecular biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) gene DNA promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time consuming pre-analytical steps such as biospecimen storage before fixing, sampling, and processing are major sources of errors and batch effects, that are further confounded by intra-tumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of pre-analytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multi-sonicator (PIXUL) and 5-methylcytosine (5mC) DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter CpG methylation was examined in 173 surgical samples from 90 individuals, 50 of these were used for intra-tumor heterogeneity studies. MGMT promoter methylation levels in paired frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples were very close, confirming suitability of FFPE for MGMT promoter methylation analysis in clinical settings. Matrix MeDIP-qPCR yielded similar results to methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR). Warm ex-vivo ischemia (37°C up to 4hrs) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not alter 5mC levels at MGMT promoter, exon and upstream enhancer regions, demonstrating the resistance of DNA methylation to the most common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. 20-30% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. Collectively these data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have significant impact on assessment of MGMT promoter methylation status. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the need for histologic verification and value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in assessment of MGMT promoter methylation. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (e.g. HOXA and lncRNAs), that are likewise resilient to variation in above post-resection pre-analytical conditions. These MGMT -associated global DNA methylation patterns offer new opportunities to validate more granular data-based epigenetic GBM clinical biomarkers where the CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could prove to be useful.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee IY, Hanft S, Schulder M, Judy KD, Wong ET, Elder JB, Evans LT, Zuccarello M, Wu J, Aulakh S, Agarwal V, Ramakrishna R, Gill BJ, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Brennan C, Zacharia BE, Silva Correia CE, Diwanji M, Pennock GK, Scott C, Perez-Olle R, Andrews DW, Boockvar JA. Autologous cell immunotherapy (IGV-001) with IGF-1R antisense oligonucleotide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Future Oncol 2024; 20:579-591. [PMID: 38060340 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Standard-of-care first-line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) is maximal safe surgical resection, then concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, followed by maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001, the first product of the Goldspire™ platform, is a first-in-class autologous immunotherapeutic product that combines personalized whole tumor-derived cells with an antisense oligonucleotide (IMV-001) in implantable biodiffusion chambers, with the intent to induce a tumor-specific immune response in patients with ndGBM. Here, we describe the design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial evaluating IGV-001 compared with placebo, both followed by standard-of-care treatment in patients with ndGBM. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and key secondary end points include overall survival and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Y Lee
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Simon Hanft
- Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Michael Schulder
- Northwell Health at North Shore University Hospital, Lake Success, NY 11030, USA
| | - Kevin D Judy
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Eric T Wong
- Rhode Island Hospital & The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | | | - Linton T Evans
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Mario Zuccarello
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
| | - Julian Wu
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | | | | | | | - Brian J Gill
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | | | - Cameron Brennan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giambra M, Di Cristofori A, Raimondo F, Rigolio R, Conconi D, Chiarello G, Tabano SM, Antolini L, Nicolini G, Bua M, Ferlito D, Carrabba G, Giussani CG, Lavitrano M, Bentivegna A. Vacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPase May Take Part in the Drug Resistance Phenotype of Glioma Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2743. [PMID: 38473989 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The vacuolar proton-translocating ATPase (V-ATPase) is a transmembrane multi-protein complex fundamental in maintaining a normal intracellular pH. In the tumoral contest, its role is crucial since the metabolism underlying carcinogenesis is mainly based on anaerobic glycolytic reactions. Moreover, neoplastic cells use the V-ATPase to extrude chemotherapy drugs into the extra-cellular compartment as a drug resistance mechanism. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most malignant and incurable primary brain tumor, the expression of this pump is upregulated, making it a new possible therapeutic target. In this work, the bafilomycin A1-induced inhibition of V-ATPase in patient-derived glioma stem cell (GSC) lines was evaluated together with temozolomide, the first-line therapy against GBM. In contrast with previous published data, the proposed treatment did not overcome resistance to the standard therapy. In addition, our data showed that nanomolar dosages of bafilomycin A1 led to the blockage of the autophagy process and cellular necrosis, making the drug unusable in models which are more complex. Nevertheless, the increased expression of V-ATPase following bafilomycin A1 suggests a critical role of the proton pump in GBM stem components, encouraging the search for novel strategies to limit its activity in order to circumvent resistance to conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Giambra
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Cristofori
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Francesca Raimondo
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Roberta Rigolio
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Donatella Conconi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Gaia Chiarello
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Silvia Maria Tabano
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, IRCCS Ca' Granda, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Antolini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Gabriella Nicolini
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Miriam Bua
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Davide Ferlito
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Giorgio Carrabba
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Carlo Giorgio Giussani
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Lavitrano
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Angela Bentivegna
- GBM-BI-TRACE (GlioBlastoMa-BIcocca-TRAnslational-CEnter), University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Karschnia P, Dietrich J, Bruno F, Dono A, Juenger ST, Teske N, Young JS, Sciortino T, Häni L, van den Bent M, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Morshed RA, Haddad AF, Molinaro AM, Tandon N, Beck J, Schnell O, Bello L, Hervey-Jumper S, Thon N, Grau SJ, Esquenazi Y, Rudà R, Chang SM, Berger MS, Cahill DP, Tonn JC. Surgical management and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without contrast enhancement (low-grade appearance): a report of the RANO resect group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:166-177. [PMID: 37665776 PMCID: PMC10768992 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor represents the standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, some tumors ultimately diagnosed as glioblastoma lack contrast enhancement and have a 'low-grade appearance' on imaging (non-CE glioblastoma). We aimed to (a) volumetrically define the value of non-CE tumor resection in the absence of contrast enhancement, and to (b) delineate outcome differences between glioblastoma patients with and without contrast enhancement. METHODS The RANO resect group retrospectively compiled a global, eight-center cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. The associations between postoperative tumor volumes and outcome were analyzed. Propensity score-matched analyses were constructed to compare glioblastomas with and without contrast enhancement. RESULTS Among 1323 newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, we identified 98 patients (7.4%) without contrast enhancement. In such patients, smaller postoperative tumor volumes were associated with more favorable outcome. There was an exponential increase in risk for death with larger residual non-CE tumor. Accordingly, extensive resection was associated with improved survival compared to lesion biopsy. These findings were retained on a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical markers. Compared to CE glioblastoma, patients with non-CE glioblastoma had a more favorable clinical profile and superior outcome as confirmed in propensity score analyses by matching the patients with non-CE glioblastoma to patients with CE glioblastoma using a large set of clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS The absence of contrast enhancement characterizes a less aggressive clinical phenotype of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Maximal resection of non-CE tumors has prognostic implications and translates into favorable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Dono
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob S Young
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Levin Häni
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander F Haddad
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juergen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan J Grau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holdhoff M, Ye X, Strowd RE, Nabors B, Walbert T, Lieberman FS, Bagley SJ, Fiveash JB, Fisher JD, Desideri S, Surakus T, Engelhardt M, Kaindl T, Lane HA, Litherland K, Grossman SA, Kleinberg LR. Lisavanbulin (BAL101553), a novel microtubule inhibitor, plus radiation in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae150. [PMID: 39371261 PMCID: PMC11450402 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lisavanbulin (BAL101553) is a small, lipophilic, oral microtubule destabilizer with promising antitumoral activity observed in preclinical glioblastoma (GBM) models. Methods This multicenter phase 1 study sought to determine the MTD of oral Lisavanbulin in combination with standard RT (60 Gy/30 fractions) but without temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (uGBM). Dose escalation followed a modified 3 + 3 design. Secondary objectives included estimation of OS and PFS and pharmacokinetic analysis. Results Twenty-six patients with uGBM (median age, 63 years, 42.3% male, 61.5% with gross total resection, median Karnofsky performance status 80) were enrolled; 2 tumors had an IDH1 mutation. Predefined dose levels of Lisavanbulin, administered daily concomitantly with RT, were: 4 mg (5 pts), 6 mg (5 pts), 8 mg (7 pts), 12 mg (5 pts), and 15 mg (4 pts). The initial starting dose was 8 mg. Due to grade 4 aseptic meningoencephalitis in the first patient, the dose was decreased to 4 mg. Dose escalation resumed and continued to 15 mg with dose-limiting toxicities of grade 2 confusion and memory impairment observed at 12 mg. Avanbulin exposures increased in a relatively dose-proportional manner with increasing oral dose of Lisavanbulin from 4 to 15 mg. Conclusions Lisavanbulin in combination with RT was considered safe up to the highest predefined oral dose level of 15 mg daily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Holdhoff
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Xiaobu Ye
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Roy E Strowd
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Burt Nabors
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joy D Fisher
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Serena Desideri
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Trisha Surakus
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marc Engelhardt
- Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kaindl
- Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Heidi A Lane
- Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | | | - Stuart A Grossman
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lawrence R Kleinberg
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang Q, Dai Z, Chen Y, Li Q, Guo Y, Zhu Z, Tu M, Cai L, Lu X. Endosome associated trafficking regulator 1 promotes tumor growth and invasion of glioblastoma multiforme via inhibiting TNF signaling pathway. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:113-127. [PMID: 38191954 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04527-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endosome associated trafficking regulator 1 (ENTR1) is a novel endosomal protein, which can affect multiple cellular biological behavior by remodeling plasma membrane structures. However, little is known regarding its function and underlying mechanisms in glioblastoma multiforme. METHODS Expression profile and clinical signature were obtained from The Public Database of human tumor. Immunohistochemical staining and western blotting assays were used to measure ENTR1 expression level. Human primary GBM tumor cells and human GBM cell lines A172, U87 and U251 were used to clarify the precise role of ENTR1. CCK-8 assays, wound healing and transwell invasion assays were designed to investigate cell viability, invasion and migration of GBM cells, respectively. Underlying molecular mechanisms of ENTR1 were determined via RNA-seq analysis. Tumor formation assay was used to validate the influence of ENTR1 in vivo. RESULTS Compared with normal brain tissues, ENTR1 was highly expressed in gliomas and correlated with malignant grades of gliomas and poor overall survival time. The proliferation and invasion of GBM cells could be weaken and the sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy increased after knocking down ENTR1. Overexpression of ENTR1 could reverse this effect. RNA-seq analysis showed that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway might be a putative regulatory target of ENTR1. Tumor formation assay validated that ENTR1 was a significant factor in tumor growth. CONCLUSION Our results indicated that ENTR1 played an important role in cell proliferation, invasion and chemotherapeutic sensitivity of GBM, suggesting that ENTR1 might be a novel prognostic marker and significant therapeutic target for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhang'an Dai
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yingyu Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qun Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuhang Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Zhangzhang Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ming Tu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lin Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| | - Xianghe Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Malmström A, Oppong FB, O`Callaghan CJ, Wick W, Laperriere N, Gorlia T, Weller M, Henriksson R, Mason W, Platten M, Cantagallo E, Grønberg BH, Reifenberger G, Marosi C, Perry JR. Prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma: Analysis of the pooled NOA-08 and Nordic trials with the CCTG-EORTC (CE.6) trial. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae211. [PMID: 39759261 PMCID: PMC11697102 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Background The majority of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma are >60 years. Three randomized trials addressed the roles of radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for elderly patients. NORDIC and NOA-08 compared RT versus TMZ, while CE.6 randomized between hypofractionated RT and RT + TMZ. All showed significant benefits for the TMZ arms, especially for those patients with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated tumors. This pooled analysis aimed at identifying additional factors that could improve individualized treatment recommendations. Methods Analyses were performed separately in the RT and TMZ arms of the pooled NORDIC and NOA-08 data, and in the RT and TMZ/RT arms of CE.6. The prognostic value of baseline clinical factors, comorbidities, and quality of life (QoL) scores were assessed. Results NORDIC + NOA-08 (NN) included 715 patients and CE.6 included 562 patients. Median age for NN was 71 and 73 years for CE.6. In NN and CE.6 respectively, 66.2% versus 70.5% underwent resection and 50.9% and 75.3% were on steroids. In NN, 401 patients received RT alone and 281 in CE.6, while 314 were randomized to TMZ alone in NN and 281 to concomitant RT + TMZ in CE.6. Known clinical prognostic factors, such as extent of resection and WHO performance status were confirmed, as was MGMT promoter methylation status for TMZ-treated patients. TMZ-treated patients with 2 or 3 comorbidities; hypertension, diabetes, and/or stroke had worse survival, both in NN (P = .022) and CE.6 (P = .022). Baseline QoL had a minor association with outcome. Conclusion Consideration of comorbidities allows improved personalized treatment decisions for elderly glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Malmström
- Department of Advanced Home Care in Linköping and Division of Cell and Neurobiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Warren Mason
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, MCTN, Heidelberg University, Mannheim and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Cantagallo
- Statistics Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bjørn H Grønberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and Department of Oncology, St Olav´s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christine Marosi
- Clinical Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - James R Perry
- Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Driscoll RK, Lyne SB, Voce DJ, Maraka S, Gondi V, Chmura SJ, Dixit KS, Kumthekar PU, Karrison TG, Pytel P, Collins JM, Stupp R, Merrell RT, Lukas RV, Yamini B. A multi-institutional phase I study of acetazolamide with temozolomide in adults with newly diagnosed MGMT-methylated malignant glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae014. [PMID: 38420615 PMCID: PMC10901541 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A significant unmet need exists for the treatment of glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM). Preclinical work shows that acetazolamide sensitizes GBM to temozolomide (TMZ) by overcoming TMZ resistance due to BCL-3-dependent upregulation of carbonic anhydrase. Acetazolamide is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of altitude sickness. Drug repurposing enables the application of drugs to diseases beyond initial indications. This multi-institutional, open-label, phase I trial examined a combination of acetazolamide and TMZ in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated high-grade glioma. Methods A total of 24 patients (GBM, IDH-wildtype = 22; Grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant = 1; Grade 3 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant = 1) were accrued over 17 months. All patients received oral acetazolamide (250 mg BID for 7 days increased to 500 mg BID for Days 8-21 of each 28-day cycle) during the adjuvant phase of TMZ for up to 6 cycles. Results No patient had a dose-limiting toxicity. Adverse events were consistent with known sequelae of acetazolamide and TMZ. In the 23 WHO Grade 4 patients, the median overall survival (OS) was 30.1 months and the median progression-free survival was 16.0 months. The 2-year OS was 60.9%. In total 37% of the study population had high BCL-3 staining and trended toward shorter OS (17.2 months vs N.R., P = .06). Conclusions The addition of acetazolamide is safe and tolerable in GBM patients receiving standard TMZ. Survival results compare favorably to historical data from randomized trials in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated GBM and support examination of acetazolamide in a randomized trial. BCL-3 expression is a potential biomarker for prognosis in GBM or for patients more likely to benefit from TMZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley K Driscoll
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sean B Lyne
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David J Voce
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stefania Maraka
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Proton Therapy Center and Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrensville, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven J Chmura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karan S Dixit
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Priya U Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Theodore G Karrison
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Peter Pytel
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John M Collins
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Roger Stupp
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ryan T Merrell
- NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bakhtiar Yamini
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baumgarten P, Prange G, Kamp MA, Monden D, Neef V, Schwarzer F, Dubinski D, Dinc N, Weber KJ, Czabanka M, Hattingen E, Ronellenfitsch MW, Steinbach JP, Senft C. Treatment of very elderly glioblastoma patients ≥ 75 years of age: whom to treat. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:509-515. [PMID: 38032426 PMCID: PMC10752837 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04518-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis of patients ≥ 75 years suffering from glioblastoma is poor. Novel therapies are usually reserved for patients ≤ 70 years. In an aging population, treatment of very elderly patients remains a challenge. METHODS Between 2010 and 2018, a total of 977 glioblastoma patients were treated at our institution. Of these, 143 patients were ≥ 75 years at diagnosis. Primary procedure was surgical resection or biopsy followed by adjuvant treatment, whenever possible. We retrospectively investigated overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors influencing survival, including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), surgical therapy, adjuvant therapy as well as MGMT promotor status. RESULTS In very elderly patients, median age was 79 years (range: 75-110). Biopsy only was performed in 104 patients; resection was performed in 39 patients. Median OS for the entire cohort was 5.9 months. Univariate analysis showed that KPS at presentation (≥ 70 vs. ≤60), surgery vs. biopsy, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS (6 vs. 3, p < 0.0111; 12 vs. 4, p = 0.0011; 11 vs. 4, p = 0.0003 and 10 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and chemotherapy (p = 0.0002) as independent factors influencing OS. CONCLUSION For very elderly patients, the natural course of disease without treatment is devastating. These patients benefit from multimodal treatment including adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A beneficial effect of resection has not been demonstrated. Treatment options and outcomes should be thoughtfully discussed before treatment decisions are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - Georg Prange
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Marcel A Kamp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Centre for Palliative and Neuro-palliative Care, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Campus Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Monden
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Vanessa Neef
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Franziska Schwarzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Daniel Dubinski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Nazife Dinc
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Katharina J Weber
- Neurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- University Cancer Center (UCT), Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Markus Czabanka
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael W Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt - Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt - Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christian Senft
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grebstad Tune B, Sareen H, Powter B, Kahana-Edwin S, Cooper A, Koh ES, Lee CS, Po JW, McCowage G, Dexter M, Cain L, O'Neill G, Prior V, Karpelowsky J, Tsoli M, Baumbusch LO, Ziegler D, Roberts TL, DeSouza P, Becker TM, Ma Y. From Pediatric to Adult Brain Cancer: Exploring Histone H3 Mutations in Australian Brain Cancer Patients. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2907. [PMID: 38001908 PMCID: PMC10669073 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11112907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic histone variants have been implicated in cancer development and progression. Mutations affecting the histone 3 (H3) family, H3.1 (encoded by HIST1H3B and HIST1H3C) and H3.3 (encoded by H3F3A), are mainly associated with pediatric brain cancers. While considered poor prognostic brain cancer biomarkers in children, more recent studies have reported H3 alterations in adult brain cancer as well. Here, we established reliable droplet digital PCR based assays to detect three histone mutations (H3.3-K27M, H3.3-G34R, and H3.1-K27M) primarily linked to childhood brain cancer. We demonstrate the utility of our assays for sensitively detecting these mutations in cell-free DNA released from cultured diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) cells and in the cerebral spinal fluid of a pediatric patient with DIPG. We further screened tumor tissue DNA from 89 adult patients with glioma and 1 with diffuse hemispheric glioma from Southwestern Sydney, Australia, an ethnically diverse region, for these three mutations. No histone mutations were detected in adult glioma tissue, while H3.3-G34R presence was confirmed in the diffuse hemispheric glioma patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedicte Grebstad Tune
- Department of Pediatric Research, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Heena Sareen
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Branka Powter
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Smadar Kahana-Edwin
- Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Adam Cooper
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Cheok S Lee
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Joseph W Po
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Geoff McCowage
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Mark Dexter
- Neurosurgery, The Children Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Lucy Cain
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Geraldine O'Neill
- Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
- The University of Sydney Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Victoria Prior
- Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
- The University of Sydney Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karpelowsky
- Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
- Paediatric Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Maria Tsoli
- Children's Cancer Institute, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Lars O Baumbusch
- Department of Pediatric Research, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organization, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway
| | - David Ziegler
- Children's Cancer Institute, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Tara L Roberts
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Paul DeSouza
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Therese M Becker
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Yafeng Ma
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lal B, Kulkarni A, McDermott J, Rais R, Alt J, Wu Y, Lopez-Bertoni H, Sall S, Kathad U, Zhou J, Slusher BS, Bhatia K, Laterra J. Preclinical Efficacy of LP-184, a Tumor Site Activated Synthetic Lethal Therapeutic, in Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4209-4218. [PMID: 37494541 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain malignancy with median survival <2 years. Standard-of-care temozolomide has marginal efficacy in approximately 70% of patients due to MGMT expression. LP-184 is an acylfulvene-derived prodrug activated by the oxidoreductase PTGR1 that alkylates at N3-adenine, not reported to be repaired by MGMT. This article examines LP-184 efficacy against preclinical GBM models and identifies molecular predictors of LP-184 efficacy in clinical GBM. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN LP-184 effects on GBM cell viability and DNA damage were determined using cell lines, primary PDX-derived cells and patient-derived neurospheres. GBM cell sensitivities to LP-184 relative to temozolomide and MGMT expression were examined. Pharmacokinetics and CNS bioavailability were evaluated in mice with GBM xenografts. LP-184 effects on GBM xenograft growth and animal survival were determined. Machine learning, bioinformatic tools, and clinical databases identified molecular predictors of GBM cells and tumors to LP-184 responsiveness. RESULTS LP-184 inhibited viability of multiple GBM cell isolates including temozolomide-resistant and MGMT-expressing cells at IC50 = approximately 22-310 nmol/L. Pharmacokinetics showed favorable AUCbrain/plasma and AUCtumor/plasma ratios of 0.11 (brain Cmax = 839 nmol/L) and 0.2 (tumor Cmax = 2,530 nmol/L), respectively. LP-184 induced regression of GBM xenografts and prolonged survival of mice bearing orthotopic xenografts. Bioinformatic analyses identified PTGR1 elevation in clinical GBM subtypes and associated LP-184 sensitivity with EGFR signaling, low nucleotide excision repair (NER), and low ERCC3 expression. Spironolactone, which induces ERCC3 degradation, decreased LP-184 IC50 3 to 6 fold and enhanced GBM xenograft antitumor responses. CONCLUSIONS These results establish LP-184 as a promising chemotherapeutic for GBM with enhanced efficacy in intrinsic or spironolactone-induced TC-NER-deficient tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bachchu Lal
- Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Rana Rais
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jesse Alt
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ying Wu
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hernando Lopez-Bertoni
- Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sophie Sall
- Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Barbara S Slusher
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - John Laterra
- Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sahm F, Brandner S, Bertero L, Capper D, French PJ, Figarella-Branger D, Giangaspero F, Haberler C, Hegi ME, Kristensen BW, Kurian KM, Preusser M, Tops BBJ, van den Bent M, Wick W, Reifenberger G, Wesseling P. Molecular diagnostic tools for the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 classification of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors; an EANO guideline. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1731-1749. [PMID: 37279174 PMCID: PMC10547522 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In the 5th edition of the WHO CNS tumor classification (CNS5, 2021), multiple molecular characteristics became essential diagnostic criteria for many additional CNS tumor types. For those tumors, an integrated, "histomolecular" diagnosis is required. A variety of approaches exists for determining the status of the underlying molecular markers. The present guideline focuses on the methods that can be used for assessment of the currently most informative diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for the diagnosis of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors. The main characteristics of the molecular methods are systematically discussed, followed by recommendations and information on available evidence levels for diagnostic measures. The recommendations cover DNA and RNA next-generation-sequencing, methylome profiling, and select assays for single/limited target analyses, including immunohistochemistry. Additionally, because of its importance as a predictive marker in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, tools for the analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status are covered. A structured overview of the different assays with their characteristics, especially their advantages and limitations, is provided, and requirements for input material and reporting of results are clarified. General aspects of molecular diagnostic testing regarding clinical relevance, accessibility, cost, implementation, regulatory, and ethical aspects are discussed as well. Finally, we provide an outlook on new developments in the landscape of molecular testing technologies in neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Neuropathology, German Concortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brandner
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Division of Neuropathology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - David Capper
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pim J French
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- Aix-Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, INP, Institute Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service d’Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France
| | - Felice Giangaspero
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Christine Haberler
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Monika E Hegi
- Neuroscience Research Center and Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bjarne W Kristensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Biotech Research and Innovation Center (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, The Bartholin Institute, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Bastiaan B J Tops
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, and University Hospital Düsseldorf, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Pieter Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands (P.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wu Y, Wang X, Zhang M, Wu D. Molecular Biomarkers and Recent Liquid Biopsy Testing Progress: A Review of the Application of Biosensors for the Diagnosis of Gliomas. Molecules 2023; 28:5660. [PMID: 37570630 PMCID: PMC10419986 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28155660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors, with a high mortality rate. Early and accurate diagnosis of gliomas is critical for successful treatment. Biosensors are significant in the detection of molecular biomarkers because they are simple to use, portable, and capable of real-time analysis. This review discusses several important molecular biomarkers as well as various biosensors designed for glioma diagnosis, such as electrochemical biosensors and optical biosensors. We present our perspectives on the existing challenges and hope that this review can promote the improvement of biosensors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanbin Wu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China;
| | - Xuning Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Air Force Hospital of Northern Theater PLA, Shenyang 110042, China
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Southern Theater of Chinese Navy, Sanya 572000, China
| | - Dongdong Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li W, Xu X. Advances in mitophagy and mitochondrial apoptosis pathway-related drugs in glioblastoma treatment. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1211719. [PMID: 37456742 PMCID: PMC10347406 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1211719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). It is a leading cause of death among patients with intracranial malignant tumors. GBM exhibits intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity, leading to drug resistance and eventual tumor recurrence. Conventional treatments for GBM include maximum surgical resection of glioma tissue, temozolomide administration, and radiotherapy, but these methods do not effectively halt cancer progression. Therefore, development of novel methods for the treatment of GBM and identification of new therapeutic targets are urgently required. In recent years, studies have shown that drugs related to mitophagy and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways can promote the death of glioblastoma cells by inducing mitochondrial damage, impairing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, and depleting large amounts of ATP. Some studies have also shown that modern nano-drug delivery technology targeting mitochondria can achieve better drug release and deeper tissue penetration, suggesting that mitochondria could be a new target for intervention and therapy. The combination of drugs targeting mitochondrial apoptosis and autophagy pathways with nanotechnology is a promising novel approach for treating GBM.This article reviews the current status of drug therapy for GBM, drugs targeting mitophagy and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, the potential of mitochondria as a new target for GBM treatment, the latest developments pertaining to GBM treatment, and promising directions for future research.
Collapse
|
28
|
Ashkan K, Baig Mirza A, Soumpasis C, Syrris C, Kalaitzoglou D, Sharma C, James ZJ, Khoja AK, Ahmed R, Vastani A, Bartram J, Chia K, Al-Salihi O, Swampilai A, Brazil L, Laxton R, Reisz Z, Bodi I, King A, Gullan R, Vergani F, Bhangoo R, Al-Sarraj S, Lavrador JP. MGMT Promoter Methylation: Prognostication beyond Treatment Response. J Pers Med 2023; 13:999. [PMID: 37373988 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
MGMT promoter methylation is related to the increased sensitivity of tumour tissue to chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and thus to improved patient survival. However, it is unclear how the extent of MGMT promoter methylation affects outcomes. In our study, a single-centre retrospective study, we explore the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma who were operated upon with 5-ALA. Demographic, clinical and histology data, and survival rates were assessed. A total of 69 patients formed the study group (mean age 53.75 ± 15.51 years old). Positive 5-ALA fluorescence was noted in 79.41%. A higher percentage of MGMT promoter methylation was related to lower preoperative tumour volume (p = 0.003), a lower likelihood of 5-ALA positive fluorescence (p = 0.041) and a larger extent of resection EoR (p = 0.041). A higher MGMT promoter methylation rate was also related to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.006, respectively), even when adjusted for the extent of resection (p = 0.034 and p = 0.042, respectively). A higher number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was also related to longer PFS and OS (p = 0.049 and p = 0.030, respectively). Therefore, this study suggests MGMT promoter methylation should be considered as a continuous variable. It is a prognostic factor that goes beyond sensitivity to chemotherapy treatment, as a higher percentage of methylation is related not only to increased EoR and increased PFS and OS, but also to lower tumour volume at presentation and a lower likelihood of 5-ALA fluorescence intraoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyoumars Ashkan
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Asfand Baig Mirza
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Christos Soumpasis
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Christoforos Syrris
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | | | - Chaitanya Sharma
- GKT School of Medicine, Kings College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
| | | | | | - Razna Ahmed
- GKT School of Medicine, Kings College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Amisha Vastani
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - James Bartram
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Kazumi Chia
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Omar Al-Salihi
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Angela Swampilai
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Lucy Brazil
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Ross Laxton
- Department of Neuropathology, Kings College London, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Zita Reisz
- Department of Neuropathology, Kings College London, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Istvan Bodi
- Department of Neuropathology, Kings College London, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Andrew King
- Department of Neuropathology, Kings College London, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Richard Gullan
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Francesco Vergani
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Ranjeev Bhangoo
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Safa Al-Sarraj
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Jose Pedro Lavrador
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Torre M, Wen PY, Iorgulescu JB. The predictive value of partial MGMT promoter methylation for IDH-wild-type glioblastoma patients. Neurooncol Pract 2023; 10:126-131. [PMID: 36970171 PMCID: PMC10037633 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma patients with hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter have significantly improved survival when treated with temozolomide compared to patients with unmethylation of the MGMT promoter. However, the prognostic and predictive significance of partial MGMT promoter methylation is unclear. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients newly diagnosed in 2018 with histopathologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma. The overall survival (OS) associated with MGMT promoter methylation status was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (P < .008 was significant). Results Three thousand eight hundred twenty-five newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were identified. The MGMT promoter was unmethylated in 58.7% (n = 2245), partially methylated in 4.8% (n = 183), hypermethylated in 3.5% (n = 133), and methylated not otherwise specified (NOS; likely consisting predominantly of hypermethylated cases) in 33.0% (n = 1264) of cases. Among patients that received first-line single-agent chemotherapy (ie likely temozolomide), compared to partial methylation (referent), MGMT promoter unmethylation was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [95 CI]: 1.54-2.44; P < .001) in multivariable Cox regression adjusted for major prognostic confounders. In contrast, a significant OS difference was not observed between partially methylated promoters and either hypermethylated (HR 1.02; 95 CI: 0.72-1.46; P = .90) or methylated NOS (HR 0.99; 95 CI: 0.78-1.26; P = .93) promoters. Among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients who did not receive first-line chemotherapy, MGMT promoter methylation status was not associated with significant differences in OS (P = 0.39-0.83). Conclusions Compared to MGMT promoter unmethylation, partial methylation was predictive of improved OS among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients treated with first-line single-agent chemotherapy-supporting the use of temozolomide therapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Torre
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Bryan Iorgulescu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gan HK. MGMT methylation: Is it time to embrace the shades of grey? Neurooncol Pract 2023; 10:111-112. [PMID: 36970166 PMCID: PMC10037944 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hui K Gan
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, and Centre for Research Excellence in Brain Cancer, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Brain Cancer Research Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Identification of MGMT Downregulation Induced by miRNA in Glioblastoma and Possible Effect on Temozolomide Sensitivity. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052061. [PMID: 36902848 PMCID: PMC10004383 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains one of the tumors with the worst prognosis. In recent years, a better overall survival (OS) has been described in cases subjected to Gross Total Resection (GTR) that were presenting hypermethylation of Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. Recently, also the expression of specific miRNAs involved in MGMT silencing has been related to survival. In this study, we evaluate MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), MGMT promoter methylation and miRNA expression in 112 GBMs and correlate the data to patients' clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses demonstrate a significant association between positive MGMT IHC and the expression of miR-181c, miR-195, miR-648 and miR-767.3p between unmethylated cases and the low expression of miR-181d and miR-648 and between methylated cases and the low expression of miR-196b. Addressing the concerns of clinical associations, a better OS has been described in presence of negative MGMT IHC, in methylated patients and in the cases with miR-21, miR-196b overexpression or miR-767.3 downregulation. In addition, a better progression-free survival (PFS) is associated with MGMT methylation and GTR but not with MGMT IHC and miRNA expression. In conclusion, our data reinforce the clinical relevance of miRNA expression as an additional marker to predict efficacy of chemoradiation in GBM.
Collapse
|
32
|
Omuro A, Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Idbaih A, Reardon DA, Cloughesy T, Sumrall A, Baehring J, van den Bent M, Bähr O, Lombardi G, Mulholland P, Tabatabai G, Lassen U, Sepulveda JM, Khasraw M, Vauleon E, Muragaki Y, Di Giacomo AM, Butowski N, Roth P, Qian X, Fu AZ, Liu Y, Potter V, Chalamandaris AG, Tatsuoka K, Lim M, Weller M. Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: An international randomized phase III trial. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:123-134. [PMID: 35419607 PMCID: PMC9825306 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 247] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Omuro
- Corresponding Author: Antonio Omuro, MD, Yale Cancer Center, 15 York Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA ()
| | - Alba A Brandes
- Present affiliation: IRCCS Istituto Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antoine F Carpentier
- Université de Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Neurologie, Paris, France
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau – Paris Brain Institute – ICM, Inserm, CNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire La Pitié Salpêtrière, DMU Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - David A Reardon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Joachim Baehring
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oliver Bähr
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Mustafa Khasraw
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nicholas Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Faye MD, Easaw J, De Robles P, Agnihotram R, Torres-Vasquez A, Lamonde F, Petrecca K, Owen S, Panet-Raymond V, Shenouda G, Souhami L, Azam M, Hossain B, Alkass J, Sabri S, Abdulkarim B. Phase II trial of concurrent sunitinib, temozolomide, and radiotherapy with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad106. [PMID: 37771465 PMCID: PMC10530294 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The overall prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal, particularly for patients with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. In this phase II trial, we tested the combination of the antiangiogenic agent sunitinib with radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed unmethylated MGMT GBM patients. Methods We enrolled 37 patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter GBM, age 18-70, and KPS ≥70. Patients received 12.5 mg of daily sunitinib for 7 days, followed by concurrent chemoradiation plus 12.5 mg sunitinib, then adjuvant TMZ. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) biomarker. Results At a median follow-up time of 15.3 months (range: 3.1-71.3 months), the median PFS was 7.15 months (95% CI: 5.4-10.5) and the 6-month PFS was 54.0%. Median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 13.8-19.4) and 2-year OS rate was 17.1%. Patients receiving >3 cycles of adjuvant TMZ, undergoing surgery at progression, and presenting a post-concurrent NLR ≤6 experienced a significant improved OS with hazard ratios of 0.197 (P = .001), 0.46 (P = .049), and 0.38 (P = .021), respectively, on multivariable analysis. Age >65 years predicted for worse OS with hazard ratio of 3.92 (P = .037). Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 22.9%, grade ≥3 neutropenia in 20%, and grade ≥3 thromboembolic events in 14.3% of patients. There were no grade 5 events. Conclusion Our findings suggest a potential benefit of combining sunitinib with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT status and provide a strong rationale to test this combination in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mame Daro Faye
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Jacob Easaw
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute
| | | | - Raman Agnihotram
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | | | - Frederic Lamonde
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Division of Neurosurgery, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Scott Owen
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
| | | | - George Shenouda
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Luis Souhami
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
| | - Maryam Azam
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bushra Hossain
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jad Alkass
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Siham Sabri
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bassam Abdulkarim
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Mcgill University Health Centre
- Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Horbinski C, Nabors LB, Portnow J, Baehring J, Bhatia A, Bloch O, Brem S, Butowski N, Cannon DM, Chao S, Chheda MG, Fabiano AJ, Forsyth P, Gigilio P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Junck L, Kaley T, Merrell R, Mrugala MM, Nagpal S, Nedzi LA, Nevel K, Nghiemphu PL, Parney I, Patel TR, Peters K, Puduvalli VK, Rockhill J, Rusthoven C, Shonka N, Swinnen LJ, Weiss S, Wen PY, Willmarth NE, Bergman MA, Darlow S. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:12-20. [PMID: 36634606 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of the following adult CNS cancers: glioma (WHO grade 1, WHO grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma [1p19q codeleted, IDH-mutant], WHO grade 2-4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 4 glioblastoma), intracranial and spinal ependymomas, medulloblastoma, limited and extensive brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, non-AIDS-related primary CNS lymphomas, metastatic spine tumors, meningiomas, and primary spinal cord tumors. The information contained in the algorithms and principles of management sections in the NCCN Guidelines for CNS Cancers are designed to help clinicians navigate through the complex management of patients with CNS tumors. Several important principles guide surgical management and treatment with radiotherapy and systemic therapy for adults with brain tumors. The NCCN CNS Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding molecular profiling of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Horbinski
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven Brem
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Samuel Chao
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Milan G Chheda
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Pierre Gigilio
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucien A Nedzi
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | - Kathryn Nevel
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | - Lode J Swinnen
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mishima K, Nishikawa R, Narita Y, Mizusawa J, Sumi M, Koga T, Sasaki N, Kinoshita M, Nagane M, Arakawa Y, Yoshimoto K, Shibahara I, Shinojima N, Asano K, Tsurubuchi T, Sasaki H, Asai A, Sasayama T, Momii Y, Sasaki A, Nakamura S, Kojima M, Tamaru J, Tsuchiya K, Gomyo M, Abe K, Natsumeda M, Yamasaki F, Katayama H, Fukuda H. Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole-brain radiotherapy with/without temozolomide for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: JCOG1114C. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:687-698. [PMID: 36334050 PMCID: PMC10076938 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal was to determine whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to the standard treatment of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) improves survival. METHODS An open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in Japan, enrolling immunocompetent patients aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed PCNSL. After administration of HD-MTX, patients were randomly assigned to receive WBRT (30 Gy) ± 10 Gy boost (arm A) or WBRT ± boost with concomitant and maintenance TMZ for two years (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between September 29, 2014 and October 15, 2018, 134 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were randomly assigned and analyzed. At the planned interim analysis, two-year OS was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.5-94.0%) in arm A and 71.4% (56.0-82.2%) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 4.98), with the predicted probability of showing the superiority of arm B at the final analysis estimated to be 1.3%. The study was terminated early due to futility. O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was measured in 115 tumors, and it was neither prognostic nor predictive of TMZ response. CONCLUSIONS This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of concomitant and maintenance TMZ in newly diagnosed PCNSL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiko Mishima
- Department of Neuro-Oncology/Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | - Ryo Nishikawa
- Department of Neuro-Oncology/Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | - Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Minako Sumi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital
| | - Tomoyuki Koga
- Department of Neuro-Oncology/Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center.,Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Nobuyoshi Sasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Manabu Kinoshita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Yoshiki Arakawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Koji Yoshimoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University
| | - Ichiyo Shibahara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | - Naoki Shinojima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kenichiro Asano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Takao Tsurubuchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | - Hikaru Sasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine
| | - Akio Asai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kansai Medical University
| | - Takashi Sasayama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yasutomo Momii
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine
| | | | - Shigeo Nakamura
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital
| | - Masaru Kojima
- Department of Anatomical and Surgical Pathology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine
| | - Junichi Tamaru
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University
| | - Kazuhiro Tsuchiya
- Department of Radiology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University
| | - Miho Gomyo
- Department of Radiology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Kayoko Abe
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Manabu Natsumeda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University
| | - Hiroshi Katayama
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Haruhiko Fukuda
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. The 2021 WHO CNS5 classification has further stressed the importance of molecular signatures in diagnosis although therapeutic breakthroughs are still lacking. In this review article, updates on the current and novel therapies in IDH-wildtype GBM will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawad M Melhem
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mary Jane Lim-Fat
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - James R Perry
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gupta T, Talukdar R, Kannan S, Dasgupta A, Chatterjee A, Patil V. Efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide compared to standard adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:354-363. [PMID: 36134016 PMCID: PMC9476976 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study was designed to compare outcomes of extended adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) vs standard adjuvant TMZ following radiotherapy (RT) plus concurrent TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma after concurrent RT/TMZ to 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (control arm) or extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ (experimental arm) were eligible. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival, while progression-free survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Hazard ratio (HR) for progression and death with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for individual primary study and pooled using random-effects model. Toxicity was defined as proportion of patients with ≥grade 3 hematologic toxicity and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Any P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Systematic literature review identified five randomized controlled trials comparing standard (6 cycles) vs extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Outcome data could be extracted from 358 patients from four primary studies. Extended adjuvant TMZ was not associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.10; P = .18) or death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.60-1.27; P = .48) compared to standard adjuvant TMZ. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity though somewhat higher with extended adjuvant TMZ, was not significantly different between the two arms (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; P = .12). Conclusions There is low-certainty evidence that extended adjuvant TMZ is not associated with significant survival benefit or increased hematologic toxicity in unselected patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma compared to standard adjuvant TMZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi
Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai,
India
| | - Riddhijyoti Talukdar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi
Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai,
India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial
Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI),
Mumbai, India
| | - Archya Dasgupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi
Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai,
India
| | - Abhishek Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi
Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai,
India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi
Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai,
India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Aquilanti E, Wen PY. Current therapeutic options for glioblastoma and future perspectives. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1629-1640. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2125302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Aquilanti
- Division of Neuro Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Division of Neuro Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Karschnia P, Young JS, Dono A, Häni L, Sciortino T, Bruno F, Juenger ST, Teske N, Morshed RA, Haddad AF, Zhang Y, Stoecklein S, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Beck J, Tandon N, Hervey-Jumper S, Molinaro AM, Rudà R, Bello L, Schnell O, Esquenazi Y, Ruge MI, Grau SJ, Berger MS, Chang SM, van den Bent M, Tonn JC. Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: a report of the RANO resect group. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:940-954. [PMID: 35961053 PMCID: PMC10158281 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (I) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (II) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit. METHODS The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from seven neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and post-operative MRI were collected. RESULTS We collected 1008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC 26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm 3) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with 'maximal CE resection' (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with 'submaximal CE resection' (class 3) or 'biopsy' (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm 3 residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 ('supramaximal CE resection'). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers. CONCLUSIONS The proposed "RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma" are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such 'supramaximal CE resection'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob S Young
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Dono
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Levin Häni
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Division for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy
| | | | - Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander F Haddad
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yalan Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sophia Stoecklein
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of NeuroOncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Juergen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy.,Division of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospital, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Division for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Maximilian I Ruge
- Department Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan J Grau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Klinikum Fulda, Academic Hospital of Marburg University, Fulda, Germany
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jin Y, Wang Z, Xiang K, Zhu Y, Cheng Y, Cao K, Jiang J. Comprehensive development and validation of gene signature for predicting survival in patients with glioblastoma. Front Genet 2022; 13:900911. [PMID: 36035145 PMCID: PMC9399759 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.900911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain tumor, with rapid proliferation and fatal invasiveness. Large-scale genetic and epigenetic profiling studies have identified targets among molecular subgroups, yet agents developed against these targets have failed in late clinical development. We obtained the genomic and clinical data of GBM patients from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) and performed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox analysis to establish a risk model incorporating 17 genes in the CGGA693 RNA-seq cohort. This risk model was successfully validated using the CGGA325 validation set. Based on Cox regression analysis, this risk model may be an independent indicator of clinical efficacy. We also developed a survival nomogram prediction model that combines the clinical features of OS. To determine the novel classification based on the risk model, we classified the patients into two clusters using ConsensusClusterPlus, and evaluated the tumor immune environment with ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT. We also constructed clinical traits-related and co-expression modules through WGCNA analysis. We identified eight genes (ANKRD20A4, CLOCK, CNTRL, ICA1, LARP4B, RASA2, RPS6, and SET) in the blue module and three genes (MSH2, ZBTB34, and DDX31) in the turquoise module. Based on the public website TCGA, two biomarkers were significantly associated with poorer OS. Finally, through GSCALite, we re-evaluated the prognostic value of the essential biomarkers and verified MSH2 as a hub biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Jin
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhanwang Wang
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kaimin Xiang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuxing Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yaxin Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ke Cao
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiaode Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Jiaode Jiang,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Influence of Unequal Amplification of Methylated and Non-Methylated Template on Performance of Pyrosequencing. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081418. [PMID: 36011328 PMCID: PMC9407541 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Pyrosequencing is one of the technologies widely used for quantitative methylation assessment. The protocol of pyrosequencing experiment consists of PCR amplification of a locus of interest and subsequent sequencing via synthesis of the amplified PCR product. As the PCR in this protocol utilizes one primer set for the amplification of a template originating from both methylated and non-methylated versions of the analysed locus, the unequal amplification of one of the templates may affect the methylation level assessment by pyrosequencing. We have investigated whether the unequal amplification of one of the templates challenges the quantitative properties of the pyrosequencing technology. Our results show that the sensitivity and dynamic range of pyrosequencing can be significantly affected by unequal amplification of the methylated and non-methylated version of the locus of interest in an assay specific manner. Thus, the assessment of the effect of unequal template amplification on the performances of the specific pyrosequencing assay is necessary before using the assay either in research or especially in diagnostic settings.
Collapse
|
42
|
Quantitative Analysis of the MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastomas in Light of the 2021 WHO Classification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133149. [PMID: 35804921 PMCID: PMC9264886 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Glioblastomas with methylation of the promoter region of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene exhibit increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy. Quantitative assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status might provide additional prognostic information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative methylation threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. Methods: We included consecutive patients ≥18 years treated at our department between 11/2010 and 08/2018 for a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, undergoing quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 321 patients were included. Median overall survival was 12.6 months. Kaplan−Meier and adjusted Cox regression analysis showed better survival for the groups with 16−30%, 31−60%, and 61−100% methylation. In contrast, survival in the group with 1−15% methylation was similar to those with unmethylated promoter regions. A secondary analysis confirmed this threshold. Conclusions: Better survival is observed in patients with glioblastomas with ≥16% methylation of the MGMT promoter region than with <16% methylation. Survival with tumors with 1−15% methylation is similar to with unmethylated tumors. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing methylation.
Collapse
|
43
|
Adeberg S, Knoll M, Koelsche C, Bernhardt D, Schrimpf D, Sahm F, König L, Harrabi SB, Hörner-Rieber J, Verma V, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Unterberg A, Sturm D, Jungk C, Herold-Mende C, Wick W, von Deimling A, Debus J, Rieken S, Abdollahi A. DNA-methylome-assisted classification of patients with poor prognostic subventricular zone associated IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2022; 144:129-142. [PMID: 35660939 PMCID: PMC9217840 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-022-02443-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) derived from the “stem cell” rich subventricular zone (SVZ) may constitute a therapy-refractory subgroup of tumors associated with poor prognosis. Risk stratification for these cases is necessary but is curtailed by error prone imaging-based evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to establish a robust DNA methylome-based classification of SVZ GBM and subsequently decipher underlying molecular characteristics. MRI assessment of SVZ association was performed in a retrospective training set of IDH-wildtype GBM patients (n = 54) uniformly treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. DNA isolated from FFPE samples was subject to methylome and copy number variation (CNV) analysis using Illumina Platform and cnAnalysis450k package. Deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a panel of 130 GBM-related genes was conducted (Agilent SureSelect/Illumina). Methylome, transcriptome, CNV, MRI, and mutational profiles of SVZ GBM were further evaluated in a confirmatory cohort of 132 patients (TCGA/TCIA). A 15 CpG SVZ methylation signature (SVZM) was discovered based on clustering and random forest analysis. One third of CpG in the SVZM were associated with MAB21L2/LRBA. There was a 14.8% (n = 8) discordance between SVZM vs. MRI classification. Re-analysis of these patients favored SVZM classification with a hazard ratio (HR) for OS of 2.48 [95% CI 1.35–4.58], p = 0.004 vs. 1.83 [1.0–3.35], p = 0.049 for MRI classification. In the validation cohort, consensus MRI based assignment was achieved in 62% of patients with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.51 and non-significant HR for OS (2.03 [0.81–5.09], p = 0.133). In contrast, SVZM identified two prognostically distinct subgroups (HR 3.08 [1.24–7.66], p = 0.016). CNV alterations revealed loss of chromosome 10 in SVZM– and gains on chromosome 19 in SVZM– tumors. SVZM– tumors were also enriched for differentially mutated genes (p < 0.001). In summary, SVZM classification provides a novel means for stratifying GBM patients with poor prognosis and deciphering molecular mechanisms governing aggressive tumor phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Koelsche
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Schrimpf
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler
- Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Sturm
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Angelika Lautenschläger Children's Hospital, University Medical Center for Children and Adolescents, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Jungk
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurooncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Khabibov M, Garifullin A, Boumber Y, Khaddour K, Fernandez M, Khamitov F, Khalikova L, Kuznetsova N, Kit O, Kharin L. Signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches in glioblastoma multiforme (Review). Int J Oncol 2022; 60:69. [PMID: 35445737 PMCID: PMC9084550 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary brain tumor and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Despite the progress in the understanding of the molecular and genetic changes that promote tumorigenesis, effective treatment options are limited. The present review intended to identify and summarize major signaling pathways and genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of GBM, as well as therapies that target these pathways. Glioblastoma remains a difficult to treat tumor; however, in the last two decades, significant improvements in the understanding of GBM biology have enabled advances in available therapeutics. Significant genomic events and signaling pathway disruptions (NF‑κB, Wnt, PI3K/AKT/mTOR) involved in the formation of GBM were discussed. Current therapeutic options may only marginally prolong survival and the current standard of therapy cures only a small fraction of patients. As a result, there is an unmet requirement for further study into the processes of glioblastoma pathogenesis and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets in novel signaling pathways implicated in the evolution of glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marsel Khabibov
- Department of Oncology, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
| | - Airat Garifullin
- Department of Histology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450000 Ufa, Russia
| | - Yanis Boumber
- Division of Hematology/Oncology at The Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia
| | - Karam Khaddour
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Manuel Fernandez
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Firat Khamitov
- Department of Histology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450000 Ufa, Russia
| | - Larisa Khalikova
- Department of Histology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450000 Ufa, Russia
| | - Natalia Kuznetsova
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Medical Research Center for Oncology, 344037 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
| | - Oleg Kit
- Abdominal Oncology Department, National Medical Research Center for Oncology, 344037 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
| | - Leonid Kharin
- Abdominal Oncology Department, National Medical Research Center for Oncology, 344037 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
- Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
de Groot J, Ott M, Wei J, Kassab C, Fang D, Najem H, O'Brien B, Weathers SP, Matsouka CK, Majd NK, Harrison RA, Fuller GN, Huse JT, Long JP, Sawaya R, Rao G, MacDonald TJ, Priebe W, DeCuypere M, Heimberger AB. A first-in-human Phase I trial of the oral p-STAT3 inhibitor WP1066 in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. CNS Oncol 2022; 11:CNS87. [PMID: 35575067 PMCID: PMC9134932 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2022-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To ascertain the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum feasible dose (MFD) of WP1066 and p-STAT3 target engagement within recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Patients & methods: In a first-in-human open-label, single-center, single-arm 3 + 3 design Phase I clinical trial, eight patients were treated with WP1066 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Results: In the absence of significant toxicity, the MFD was identified to be 8 mg/kg. The most common adverse event was grade 1 nausea and diarrhea in 50% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred; 6 of 8 patients died from disease progression and one was lost to follow-up. Of 8 patients with radiographic follow-up, all had progressive disease. The longest response duration exceeded 3.25 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.7 months-NA months), and 6-month PFS (PFS6) rate was 0%. The median overall survival (OS) rate was 25 months (95% CI: 22.5 months-NA months), with an estimated 1-year OS rate of 100%. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data demonstrated that at 8 mg/kg, the T1/2 was 2-3 h with a dose dependent increase in the Cmax. Immune monitoring of the peripheral blood demonstrated that there was p-STAT3 suppression starting at a dose of 1 mg/kg. Conclusion: Immune analyses indicated that WP1066 inhibited systemic immune p-STAT3. WP1066 had an MFD identified at 8 mg/kg which is the target allometric dose based on prior preclinical modeling in combination with radiation therapy and a Phase II study is being planned for newly diagnosed MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John de Groot
- Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Martina Ott
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jun Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cynthia Kassab
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dexing Fang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hinda Najem
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 259 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Barbara O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shiao-Pei Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Carlos Kamiya Matsouka
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nazanin K Majd
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca A Harrison
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gregory N Fuller
- Department of Neuropathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Neuropathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - James P Long
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Raymond Sawaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tobey J MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, 1405 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Waldemar Priebe
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael DeCuypere
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 259 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 259 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Clinical measures, radiomics, and genomics offer synergistic value in AI-based prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8784. [PMID: 35610333 PMCID: PMC9130299 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12699-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Multi-omic data, i.e., clinical measures, radiomic, and genetic data, capture multi-faceted tumor characteristics, contributing to a comprehensive patient risk assessment. Here, we investigate the additive value and independent reproducibility of integrated diagnostics in prediction of overall survival (OS) in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM patients, by combining conventional and deep learning methods. Conventional radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from pre-operative multi-parametric MRI of 516 GBM patients. Support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were trained on the radiomic features in the discovery cohort (n = 404) to categorize patient groups of high-risk (OS < 6 months) vs all, and low-risk (OS ≥ 18 months) vs all. The trained radiomic model was independently tested in the replication cohort (n = 112) and a patient-wise survival prediction index was produced. Multivariate Cox-PH models were generated for the replication cohort, first based on clinical measures solely, and then by layering on radiomics and molecular information. Evaluation of the high-risk and low-risk classifiers in the discovery/replication cohorts revealed area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.85)/0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.84)/0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.71), respectively. Cox-PH modeling showed a concordance index of 0.65 (95% CI 0.6-0.7) for clinical data improving to 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.79) for the combination of all omics. This study signifies the value of integrated diagnostics for improved prediction of OS in GBM.
Collapse
|
47
|
Rothe F, Patties I, Kortmann RD, Glasow A. Immunomodulatory Effects by Photodynamic Treatment of Glioblastoma Cells In Vitro. MOLECULES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 27:molecules27113384. [PMID: 35684322 PMCID: PMC9181863 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27113384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multimodal treatment adding immunotherapy and photodynamic treatment (PDT) to standard therapy might improve the devastating therapeutic outcome of glioblastoma multiforme patients. As a first step, we provide investigations to optimize dendritic cell (DC) vaccination by using PDT and ionizing radiation (IR) to achieve maximal synergistic effects. In vitro experiments were conducted on murine glioblastoma GL261 cells, primary DCs differentiated from bone marrow and T cells, isolated from the spleen. Induction of cell death, reactive oxygen species, and inhibition of proliferation by tetrahydroporphyrin-tetratosylat (THPTS)-PDT and IR were confirmed by WST-1, LDH, ROS, and BrdU assay. Tumor cargo (lysate or cells) for DC load was treated with different combinations of THPTS-PDT, freeze/thaw cycles, and IR and immunogenicity analyzed by induction of T-cell activation. Cellular markers (CD11c, 83, 86, 40, 44, 69, 3, 4, 8, PD-L1) were quantified by flow cytometry. Cytotoxic T-cell response was evaluated by calcein AM assay. Immunogenicity of THPTS-PDT-treated GL261 cells lysate was superior to IR-treated lysate, or treated whole cells proven by increased DC phagocytosis, T-cell adhesion, proliferation, cytolytic activity, and cytokine release. These data strongly support the application of PDT together with IR for optimal immunogenic cell death induction in tumor cell lysate used to pulse DC vaccines.
Collapse
|
48
|
Brat DJ, Aldape K, Bridge JA, Canoll P, Colman H, Hameed MR, Harris BT, Hattab EM, Huse JT, Jenkins RB, Lopez-Terrada DH, McDonald WC, Rodriguez FJ, Souter LH, Colasacco C, Thomas NE, Yount MH, van den Bent MJ, Perry A. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:547-574. [PMID: 35175291 PMCID: PMC9311267 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0295-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The diagnosis and clinical management of patients with diffuse gliomas (DGs) have evolved rapidly over the past decade with the emergence of molecular biomarkers that are used to classify, stratify risk, and predict treatment response for optimal clinical care. OBJECTIVE.— To develop evidence-based recommendations for informing molecular biomarker testing for pediatric and adult patients with DGs and provide guidance for appropriate laboratory test and biomarker selection for optimal diagnosis, risk stratification, and prediction. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. A systematic review of literature was conducted to address the overarching question, "What ancillary tests are needed to classify DGs and sufficiently inform the clinical management of patients?" Recommendations were derived from quality of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS.— Thirteen recommendations and 3 good practice statements were established to guide pathologists and treating physicians on the most appropriate methods and molecular biomarkers to include in laboratory testing to inform clinical management of patients with DGs. CONCLUSIONS.— Evidence-based incorporation of laboratory results from molecular biomarker testing into integrated diagnoses of DGs provides reproducible and clinically meaningful information for patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Brat
- From the Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Brat)
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (Aldape)
| | - Julia A Bridge
- The Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (Bridge)
- Cytogenetics, ProPath, Dallas, Texas (Bridge)
| | - Peter Canoll
- The Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (Canoll)
| | - Howard Colman
- The Department of Neurosurgery and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Colman)
| | - Meera R Hameed
- The Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hameed)
| | - Brent T Harris
- The Department of Neurology and Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Harris)
| | - Eyas M Hattab
- The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky (Hattab)
| | - Jason T Huse
- The Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Huse)
| | - Robert B Jenkins
- The Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Jenkins)
| | - Dolores H Lopez-Terrada
- The Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas (Lopez-Terrada)
| | - William C McDonald
- The Department of Pathology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota (McDonald)
| | - Fausto J Rodriguez
- The Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Rodriguez)
| | | | - Carol Colasacco
- Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Thomas)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Colasacco, Thomas)
| | | | - Martin J van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (van den Bent)
| | - Arie Perry
- The Departments of Pathology and Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco (Perry)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
A Novel Risk Score Model Based on Eleven Extracellular Matrix-Related Genes for Predicting Overall Survival of Glioma Patients. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:4966820. [PMID: 35528238 PMCID: PMC9076298 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4966820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common lethal primary brain tumors with variable survival outcomes for patients. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is linked with clinical prognosis of glioma patients, but it is not commonly used as a clinical indicator. Herein, we investigated changes in ECM-related genes (ECMRGs) via analyzing the transcriptional data of 938 gliomas from TCGA and CGGA datasets. Based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis, a 11-ECMRG signature that is strongly linked with overall survival (OS) in glioma patients was identified. This signature was characterized by high-risk and low-risk score patterns. We found that the patients in the high-risk group are significantly linked with malignant molecular features and worse outcomes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that the signature is an independent indicator for glioma prognosis. The prediction accuracy of the signature was verified through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots. Further bioinformatics analyses implied that the ECMRG signature is strongly associated with the activation of multiple oncogenic and metabolic pathways and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in gliomas. In addition, we confirmed that the high-risk score is an indicator for a therapy-resistant phenotype. In addition to bioinformatics analyses, we functionally verified the oncogenic role of bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1) in gliomas in vitro.
Collapse
|
50
|
Tierling S, Jürgens-Wemheuer WM, Leismann A, Becker-Kettern J, Scherer M, Wrede A, Breuskin D, Urbschat S, Sippl C, Oertel J, Schulz-Schaeffer WJ, Walter J. Bisulfite profiling of the MGMT promoter and comparison with routine testing in glioblastoma diagnostics. Clin Epigenetics 2022; 14:26. [PMID: 35180887 PMCID: PMC8857788 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01244-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is an acknowledged predictive epigenetic marker in glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Patients with methylated CpGs in the MGMT promoter benefit from treatment with alkylating agents, such as temozolomide, and show an improved overall survival and progression-free interval. A precise determination of MGMT promoter methylation is of importance for diagnostic decisions. We experienced that different methods show partially divergent results in a daily routine. For an integrated neuropathological diagnosis of malignant gliomas, we therefore currently apply a combination of methylation-specific PCR assays and pyrosequencing. Results To better rationalize the variation across assays, we compared these standard techniques and assays to deep bisulfite sequencing results in a cohort of 80 malignant astrocytomas. Our deep analysis covers 49 CpG sites of the expanded MGMT promoter, including exon 1, parts of intron 1 and a region upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). We observed that deep sequencing data are in general in agreement with CpG-specific pyrosequencing, while the most widely used MSP assays published by Esteller et al. (N Engl J Med 343(19):1350–1354, 2000. 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901) and Felsberg et al. (Clin Cancer Res 15(21):6683–6693, 2009. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2801) resulted in partially discordant results in 22 tumors (27.5%). Local deep bisulfite sequencing (LDBS) revealed that CpGs located in exon 1 are suited best to discriminate methylated from unmethylated samples. Based on LDBS data, we propose an optimized MSP primer pair with 83% and 85% concordance to pyrosequencing and LDBS data. A hitherto neglected region upstream of the TSS, with an overall higher methylation compared to exon 1 and intron 1 of MGMT, is also able to discriminate the methylation status. Conclusion Our integrated analysis allows to evaluate and redefine co-methylation domains within the MGMT promoter and to rationalize the practical impact on assays used in daily routine diagnostics. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-022-01244-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Tierling
- Fak.NT Life Sciences, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2 4, 66041, Saarbrücken, Germany.
| | | | - Alea Leismann
- Fak.NT Life Sciences, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2 4, 66041, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Julia Becker-Kettern
- Institute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Scherer
- Fak.NT Life Sciences, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2 4, 66041, Saarbrücken, Germany.,Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arne Wrede
- Institute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - David Breuskin
- Institute for Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Steffi Urbschat
- Institute for Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Sippl
- Institute for Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Oertel
- Institute for Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Jörn Walter
- Fak.NT Life Sciences, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2 4, 66041, Saarbrücken, Germany
| |
Collapse
|