What Is the Real Impact of Estrogen Receptor Status on the Prognosis and Treatment of HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer?

Distinct ER and PR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical outcomes of early HER2-positive breast cancer: A real-world analysis of 871 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy

INTRODUCTION

The impact of distinct estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression patterns on tumor behavior and treatment outcomes within HER2-positive breast cancer is not fully explored. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the clinical differences among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer harboring distinct ER and PR expression patterns in the neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 871 HER2-positive breast patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy at our hospital between 2011 and 2022. Comparisons were performed across the three hormone receptor (HR)-specific subtypes, namely the ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-positive (ER-/PR-/HER2+), the single HR-positive (HR+)/HER2+, and the triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) subtypes.

RESULTS

Of 871 patients, 21.0% had ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors, 33.6% had single HR+/HER2+ disease, and 45.4% had TPBC. Individuals with single HR+/HER2+ tumors and TPBC cases demonstrated significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared to those with ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors (36.9% vs. 24.3% vs. 49.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed TPBC as significantly associated with decreased pCR likelihood (OR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.28-0.63, p < 0.001). Survival outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), showed no significant differences across HR-specific subtypes in the overall patient population. However, within patients without anti-HER2 therapy, TPBC was linked to improved DFS and a trend towards better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-positive breast cancer exhibited three distinct HR-specific subtypes with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. These findings suggest personalized treatment strategies considering ER and PR expression patterns, emphasizing the need for further investigations to unravel molecular traits underlying HER2-positive breast cancer with distinct HR expression patterns.

Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Hormone Therapy and Anti-HER2 Treatment: An Update on Treatment Strategies

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer represents a distinct subtype expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors with an overexpression of HER2. Approximately 14% of female breast cancer cases are HER2-positive, with the majority being HR-positive. These tumors show a cross-talk between the hormonal and HER2 pathways; the interaction has implications for the treatment options for the disease. In this review, we analyze the biology of HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and summarize the evidence concerning the standard of care options both in neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings and in advanced disease. Additionally, we focus on new trials and drugs for HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and the new entity: HER2-low breast cancer.

Endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy, another favorable option for HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients

Advanced breast cancer (ABC) that is positive for hormone receptors (HRs) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a cancer subtype with distinctive characteristics. The primary treatment guidelines suggest that a combination therapy comprising anti-HER2 therapy and chemotherapy should be administered as the initial treatment for HR-positive/ HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) ABC. However, crosstalk between the HR and HER2 pathways can partially account for the resistance of HR+/HER2+ disease to HER2-targeted therapy. This, in turn, provides a rationale for the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy (ET). Many clinical studies have confirmed that the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and ET as a first-line treatment is not inferior to the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy, and support its use as a first-line treatment choice for HR+/HER2+ ABC. Other drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors, may also improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer by blocking signaling pathways associated with tumor proliferation and break new ground for the treatment of HR+/HER2+ ABC.

Differential response of HER2-positive breast cancer to anti-HER2 therapy based on HER2 protein expression level

BACKGROUND

Increasing data indicate that HER2-positive (HER2 + ) breast cancer (BC) subtypes exhibit differential responses to targeted anti-HER2 therapy. This study aims to investigate these differences and the potential underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

A large cohort of BC patients (n = 7390) was utilised. The clinicopathological characteristics and differential gene expression (DGE) of HER2+ immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes, specifically HER2 IHC 3+ and IHC 2 + /Amplified, were assessed and correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, respectively. The role of oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also investigated.

RESULTS

Compared to HER2 IHC 3+ tumours, BC patients with IHC 2 + /Amplified showed a significantly lower pCR rate (22% versus 57%, P < 0.001), shorter survival regardless of HER2 gene copy number, were less classified as HER2 enriched, and enriched for trastuzumab resistance and ER signalling pathway genes. ER positivity significantly decreased response to anti-HER2 therapy in IHC 2 + /Amplified, but not in IHC 3 + BC patients.

CONCLUSION

In HER2 + BC, overexpression of HER2 protein is the driver of the oncogenic pathway, and it is the main predictor of response to anti-HER2 therapy. ER signalling pathways are more dominant in BC with equivocal HER2 expression. personalised anti-HER2 therapy based on IHC classes should be considered.

PR status is a more decisive factor in efficacy of adding pertuzumab into neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive and lymph node-positive breast cancer than ER status: a real-world retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP)-based regimens are recommended for human epidermal receptor-positive (HER2 +)/lymph node-positive (N +) breast cancer (BC) patients according to NCCN guidelines, it is undeniable that many patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after trastuzumab (H)-based regimens without adding pertuzumab to treatment. Patients who specifically benefit from pertuzumab must be identified. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate progesterone receptor (PR) status as a predictor of response to the addition of pertuzumab in HER2 + /N + breast cancer.

METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients who were diagnosed as HER2 + /N + BC without distant metastasis and followed by neoadjuvant HP-based or H-based therapy were retrospectively included. The endpoints were pCR and disease-free survival (DFS) times.

RESULTS

In total, the pCR occurred in 25 of 87 patients (28.74%) in group H compared with 32 of 55 (58.18%) in group HP. The results revealed that hormone receptor (HR) status was significantly different on pCR in group HP. The odds of pCR for patients who have HR-positive tumors were 0.160 times (P = 0.011) that for patients with HR-negative tumors by multivariable analysis. Moreover, a similar probability of PR-positive (PR +) patients, whatever estrogen receptor (ER) status was, achieving pCR in group HP was observed. The ROC curves showed different anti-HER2 regimens provide worst predictive value in the PR + cohort (N = AUC = 0.521, 95% CI: 0.348-0.694, P = 0.813) compared with the overall cohort (AUC = 0.644, 95% CI: 0.550-0.738, P = 0.004) and ER + cohort (AUC: 0.559, 95% CI: 0.405-0.713, P = 0.451). And PR status (AUC = 0.760, 95% CI: 0.626-0.894, P = 0.001) had a greater predictive value than ER status (AUC = 0.658, 95% CI: 0.508-0.807, P = 0.048) in group HP. DFS analyses were done on 141 patients. Although ER and PR status did not show significant difference in group HP (P = 0.789 and 0.088, respectively), HP-based therapy contributed to better DFS in the ER - and PR - cohorts (P = 0.035 and 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ER status, PR status might be a more valuable factor predicting the efficacy of adding pertuzumab into neoadjuvant therapy for HER2 + /N + BC. PR + patients benefit little from the addition of pertuzumab.

DECRESCENDO: de-escalating chemotherapy in HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-negative, node-negative early breast cancer

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched intrinsic subtype represents up to 75% of all HER2-positive hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer (BC). Optimizing HER2-targeting therapy in this population might allow the omission of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, which is associated with potentially severe toxicities. DECRESCENDO (NCT04675827) is a large, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial in patients with HR-negative, HER2-positive, node-negative early BC evaluating a neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination administered subcutaneously plus taxane-based chemotherapy followed by adjuvant treatment, adapted according to response to neoadjuvant therapy. The primary end point is the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate in patients with 'HER2-enriched' tumors and a pathological complete response. This flexible care substudy offers adjuvant treatment administration outside the hospital to some patients.

Individualize management for advanced breast cancer with pyrotinib-based anti-HER2 therapy: a case report

Background

We report a case of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive breast cancer who achieved encouraging clinical benefits across multiple pyrotinib-based anti-HER2 therapies.

Case Description

A 33-year-old woman was diagnosed with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-positive breast cancer in June 2018, and did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or anti-HER2 targeted therapy post-breast conserving surgery. By May 2020, she developed recurrence of the left breast mass with metastases in liver, bone and lymph nodes. She then received pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy. Both the left breast mass and liver metastases showed noticeable improvement, with the disease evaluated as partial response (PR). Despite this promising result, the patient developed brain metastases after first-line treatment. A combination regimen of pyrotinib retention plus inetetamab and vinorelbine were administered as second-line anti-HER2 therapy, and the brain metastases visibly shrunk, leading to PR, with the extracranial lesions remaining stable. Ultimately, due to brain lesions progression, the treatment was transitioned to trastuzumab deruxtecan. We applied next generation sequencing (NGS) to illustrate the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy and minimal residual disease (MRD) to detect the disease status.

Conclusions

Pyrotinib is a promising antineoplastic agent for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients. Under the guidance of precision medicine, it is encouraged to utilize novel diagnostic and therapeutic methods to manage advanced breast cancer patients.

Development and validation of a prognostic 15-gene signature for stratifying HER2+/ER+ breast cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous subgroup. Estrogen receptor (ER) status is emerging as a predictive marker within HER2+ BCs, with the HER2+/ER+ cases usually having better survival in the first 5 years after diagnosis but have higher recurrence risk after 5 years compared to HER2+/ER-. This is possibly because sustained ER signaling in HER2+ BCs helps escape the HER2 blockade. Currently HER2+/ER+ BC is understudied and lacks biomarkers. Thus, a better understanding of the underlying molecular diversity is important to find new therapy targets for HER2+/ER+ BCs.

Methods

In this study, we performed unsupervised consensus clustering together with genome-wide Cox regression analyses on the gene expression data of 123 HER2+/ER+ BC from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) cohort to identify distinct HER2+/ER+ subgroups. A supervised eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was then built in TCGA using the identified subgroups and validated in another two independent datasets (Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (accession number GSE149283)). Computational characterization analyses were also performed on the predicted subgroups in different HER2+/ER+ BC cohorts.

Results

We identified two distinct HER2+/ER+ subgroups with different survival outcomes using the expression profiles of 549 survival-associated genes from the Cox regression analyses. Genome-wide gene expression differential analyses found 197 differentially expressed genes between the two identified subgroups, with 15 genes overlapping the 549 survival-associated genes.XGBoost classifier, using the expression values of the 15 genes, achieved a strong cross-validated performance (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, Sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.77) in predicting the subgroup labels. Further investigation partially confirmed the differences in survival, drug response, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, published gene signatures, and CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screened gene dependency scores between the two identified subgroups.

Conclusion

This is the first study to stratify HER2+/ER+ tumors. Overall, the initial results from different cohorts showed there exist two distinct subgroups in HER2+/ER+ tumors, which can be distinguished by a 15-gene signature. Our findings could potentially guide the development of future precision therapies targeted on HER2+/ER+ BC.

Dalpiciclib partially abrogates ER signaling activation induced by pyrotinib in HER2+HR+ breast cancer

Recent evidences from clinical trials (NCT04486911) revealed that the combination of pyrotinib, letrozole, and dalpiciclib exerted optimistic therapeutic effect in treating HER2⁺HR⁺ breast cancer; however, the underlying molecular mechanism remained elusive. Through the drug sensitivity test, the drug combination efficacy of pyrotinib, tamoxifen, and dalpiciclib to BT474 cells was tested. The underlying molecular mechanisms were investigated using immunofluorescence, Western blot analysis, immunohistochemical staining, and cell cycle analysis. Potential risk factor that may indicate the responsiveness to drug treatment in HER2⁺/HR⁺ breast cancer was identified using RNA-sequence and evaluated using immunohistochemical staining and in vivo drug susceptibility test. We found that pyrotinib combined with dalpiciclib exerted better cytotoxic efficacy than pyrotinib combined with tamoxifen in BT474 cells. Degradation of HER2 could enhance ER nuclear transportation, activating ER signaling pathway in BT474 cells, whereas dalpiciclib could partially abrogate this process. This may be the underlying mechanism by which combination of pyrotinib, tamoxifen, and dalpiciclib exerted best cytotoxic effect. Furthermore, CALML5 was revealed to be a risk factor in the treatment of HER2⁺/HR⁺ breast cancer and the usage of dalpiciclib might overcome the drug resistance to pyrotinib + tamoxifen due to CALML5 expression. Our study provided evidence that the usage of dalpiciclib in the treatment of HER2⁺/HR⁺ breast cancer could partially abrogate the estrogen signaling pathway activation caused by anti-HER2 therapy and revealed that CALML5 could serve as a risk factor in the treatment of HER2⁺/HR⁺ breast cancer.

Treatment strategies for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer: A review

Hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a unique subtype of breast cancer. Most current guidelines recommend that combination regimens based on anti-HER2 therapy should be used as first-line treatment for HER2+ MBC, irrespective of HR status. Endocrine therapy can be applied as maintenance therapy for patients who are intolerant to chemotherapy or post-chemotherapy. Increasing evidence suggests that complex molecular crosstalk between HR and HER2 pathways may affect the sensitivity to both HER2-targeted and endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Recent research and clinical trials have revealed that a combination of endocrine therapy and anti-HER2 approaches without chemotherapy provides along-term disease control for some patients, but the challenge lies in how to accurately identify the subsets of patients who can benefit from such a de-chemotherapy treatment strategy. In this review, we aim to summarize the results of preclinical and clinical studies in HR+/HER2+ MBC and discuss the possibility of sparing chemotherapy in this subgroup of patients.

Mass spectroscopy-based proteomics and metabolomics analysis of triple-positive breast cancer cells treated with tamoxifen and/or trastuzumab

PURPOSE

HER2-enriched breast cancer with high levels of hormone receptor expression, known as "triple positive" breast cancer, may represent a new entity with a relatively favourable prognosis against which the combination of chemotherapy, HER-2 inhibition, and endocrine treatment may be considered overtreatment. We explored the effect of the anticancer drugs tamoxifen and trastuzumab, both separately and in combination, on the integrated proteomic and metabolic profile of "triple positive" breast cancer cells (BT-474).

METHOD

We employed ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry using a Bruker timsTOF to investigate changes in BT-474 cell line treated with either tamoxifen, trastuzumab or a combination. Differentially abundant metabolites were identified using the Bruker Human Metabolome Database metabolite library and proteins using the Uniprot proteome for Homo sapiens using MetaboScape and MaxQuant, respectively, for identification and quantitation.

RESULTS

A total of 77 proteins and 85 metabolites were found to significantly differ in abundance in BT-474 treated cells with tamoxifen 5 μM/and or trastuzumab 2.5 μM. Findings suggest that by targeting important cellular signalling pathways which regulate cell growth, apoptosis, proliferation, and chemoresistance, these medicines have a considerable anti-growth effect in BT-474 cells. Pathways enriched for dysregulation include RNA splicing, neutrophil degranulation and activation, cellular redox homeostasis, mitochondrial transmembrane transport, ferroptosis and necroptosis, ABC transporters and central carbon metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Our findings in protein and metabolite level research revealed that anti-cancer drug therapy had a significant impact on the key signalling pathways and molecular processes in triple positive BT-474 cell lines.

Targeted Therapeutic Options and Future Perspectives for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

The development of several antiHuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) treatments over the last few years has improved the landscape of HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite this, relapse is still the main issue in HER2-positive breast cancer. The reasons for therapeutic failure lie in the heterogeneity of the disease itself, as well as in the drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we intended to understand the milestones that have had an impact on this disease up to their implementation in clinical practice. In addition, understanding the underlying molecular biology of HER2-positive disease is essential for the optimization and personalization of the different treatment options. For this reason, we focused on two relevant aspects, which are triple-positive disease and the role that modulation of the immune response might play in treatment and prognosis.

Abstract

Despite the improvement achieved by the introduction of HER2-targeted therapy, up to 25% of early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) patients will relapse. Beyond trastuzumab, other agents approved for early HER2+ BC include the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and the reversible HER2 inhibitor lapatinib. New agents, such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan or tucatinib in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab, have also shown a significant improvement in the metastatic setting. Other therapeutic strategies to overcome treatment resistance have been explored in HER2+ BC, mainly in HER2+ that also overexpress estrogen receptors (ER+). In ER+ HER2+ patients, target therapies such as phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibition or cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 blocking may be effective in controlling downstream of HER2 and many of the cellular pathways associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapies. Multiple trials have explored these strategies with some promising results, and probably, in the next years conclusive results will succeed. In addition, HER2+ BC is known to be more immunogenic than other BC subgroups, with high variability between tumors. Different immunotherapeutic agents such as HER-2 therapy plus checkpoint inhibitors, or new vaccines approaches have been investigated in this setting, with promising but controversial results obtained to date.

Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptor Gene Expression in HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Post-hoc Analysis of the NCCTG-N9831 (Alliance) Trial

BACKGROUND

Beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) modulates immune activation and may enhance trastuzumab activity. We assessed the impact of ß2AR gene (ADRB2) expression on the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer enrolled on the NCCTG-N9831 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of the NCCTG-N9831 trial, which compared chemotherapy (arm A) versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (arms B&C) as adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, with disease-free survival (DFS) as primary endpoint. Gene expression levels retrieved by DASL assay were used to classify patients as ADRB2-high or ADRB2-low. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by a Cox proportional model adjusted for prognostic variables and ADRB2 expression. Correlations between ADRB2 expression and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels were assessed with Pearson coefficient. A multivariable Cox regression model with interaction term was performed to assess the interaction between ADRB2 expression and treatment arm; and ADRB2 expression and a 8-gene signature previously shown to predict trastuzumab benefit.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,282 patients were included (ADRB2-high [N = 944] / ADRB2-low [N = 338]). A high expression of ADRB2 was associated with a longer DFS (P = .01) in the overall population. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improved DFS only in patients with ADRB2-high tumors (P < .01). ADRB2 expression was correlated with TIL levels (r = 0.24, P < .001). No association between ADRB2 expression and the 8-gene trastuzumab benefit signature was observed (P = .32).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that a high ADRB2 expression is a favorable prognostic factor and may identify patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT00005970.

The analysis of breast cancer survival in East Azerbaijan province of Iran; prognostic impact of chemotherapy and hormone therapy protocols

BACKGROUND

The global cancer pattern indicated that there were about 2.3 million newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in 2020 worldwide, and was the most common cancer incident in the world. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic impact of various treatment modalities and cancer-specific overall and disease-free survival rates.

METHODS

One, 5-, 10-, and 15 -years survival rates were calculated; furthermore, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates were obtained using Kaplan Meier method. To assess the effects of different treatment methods and all clinico-pathological variables with OS and DFS, cox-regression method was used to achieve adjusted hazard ratios of mortality and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

During the study period, 504 primary breast cancer cases were evaluated, with mean age of 49.69(± 10.68) years. The one, 5-, 10-, and 15- year survival rates were 98.21%, 87.39%, 68.17% and, 60.60%, respectively. Tamoxifen + GnRh Agonist and Tamoxifen protocols decreased the hazard of relapse 46% and 84%, respectively. The best one-year OS was obtained for patients treated with Tamoxifen with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for about 100% overall survival rate. The breast cancer mortality rate was lower than relapse rate in the first and 5thyears of disease, but 10- and 15- year mortality were higher than 10- and 15 -year relapse rates.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed better overall survival and disease- free survival among primary breast cancer patients in East Azerbaijan; consequently, this underscores establishing and using better chemotherapy and hormone therapy protocols and sufficient follow-ups.

Non-BRCA Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Young Women

The incidence of breast cancer in younger women is rising. Although early-onset breast cancer is highly associated with biologically aggressive tumors such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers, the more recent increase is disproportionately driven by an increase in the incidence of luminal cancer. In particular, the increase in de novo stage IV disease and the inherent age-based poorer survival rate among younger women with even early-stage luminal cancers suggest underlying distinct biologic characteristics that are not well understood. Further contributing to the higher number of early-onset breast cancers is pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC), which is attributed to persistent increases in maternal age over time. Although guidelines for screening of patients who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation are well established, this population comprises only a fraction of those with early-onset breast cancer. A lack of screening in most young patients precludes timely diagnosis, underscoring the importance of early education and awareness. The disproportionate disease burden in young women of certain racial and ethnic groups, which is further exacerbated by socioeconomic disparity in health care, results in worse outcomes. An invited commentary by Monticciolo is available online. ^©RSNA, 2022.

The TRAR gene classifier to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive and ER-positive breast cancer patients: an explorative analysis from the NeoSphere trial

As most erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) patients currently receive dual HER2-targeting added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, improved methods for identifying individual response, and assisting postsurgical salvage therapy, are needed. Herein, we evaluated the 41-gene classifier trastuzumab advantage risk model (TRAR) as a predictive marker for patients enrolled in the NeoSphere trial. TRAR scores were computed from RNA of 350 pre- and 166 post-treatment tumor specimens. Overall, TRAR score was significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) rate independently of other predictive clinico-pathological variables. Separate analyses according to estrogen receptor (ER) status showed a significant association between TRAR score and pCR in ER-positive specimens but not in ER-negative counterparts. Among ER-positive BC patients not achieving a pCR, those with TRAR-low scores in surgical specimens showed a trend for lower distant event-free survival. In conclusion, in HER2-positive/ER-positive BC, TRAR is an independent predictor of pCR and represents a promising tool to select patients responsive to anti-HER2-based neoadjuvant therapy and to assist treatment escalation and de-escalation strategies in this setting.

Comparing Biomarkers for Predicting Pathological Responses to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The predictive strength and accuracy of some biomarkers for the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the HER2-enriched subtype and the presence of PIK3CA mutations, namely, TILs, HRs, and Ki-67, in predicting the pCR to HER2-positive breast cancer therapy.

METHODS

We screened studies that included pCR predicted by one of the following biomarkers: the HER2-enriched subtype and the presence of PIK3CA mutations, TILs, HRs, or Ki-67. We then calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs, respectively), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) were used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the HER2-enriched subtype and the presence of PIK3CA mutations, namely, TILs, HRs, and Ki-67, were 0.66 and 0.62, 0.85 and 0.27, 0.49 and 0.61, 0.54 and 0.64, and 0.68 and 0.51, respectively. The AUC of the HER2-enriched subtype was significantly higher (0.71) than those for the presence of TILs (0.59, p = 0.003), HRs (0.65, p = 0.003), and Ki-67 (0.62, p = 0.005). The AUC of the HER2-enriched subtype had a tendency to be higher than that of the presence of PIK3CA mutations (0.58, p = 0.220). Moreover, it had relatively high PPV (0.58) and LR+ (1.77), similar NPV (0.73), and low LR- (0.54) compared with the other four biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

The HER2-enriched subtype has a moderate breast cancer diagnostic accuracy, which is better than those of the presence of PIK3CA mutations, TILs, HRs, and Ki-67.

Copy Number Aberration Analysis to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2 Therapy: Results from the NeoALTTO Phase III Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The heterogeneity of response to anti-HER2 agents represents a major challenge in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. To better understand the sensitivity and resistance to trastuzumab and lapatinib, we investigated the role of copy number aberrations (CNA) in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes in the NeoALTTO trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The neoadjuvant phase III NeoALTTO trial enrolled 455 patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. DNA samples from 269 patients were assessed for genome-wide copy number profiling. Recurrent CNAs were found with GISTIC2.0.

RESULTS

CNA estimates were obtained for 184 patients included in NeoALTTO. Among those, matched transcriptome and whole-exome data were available for 154 and 181 patients, respectively. A significant association between gene copy number and pCR was demonstrated for ERBB2 amplification. Nevertheless, ERBB2 amplification ceased to be predictive once ERBB2 expression level was considered. GISTIC2.0 analysis revealed 159 recurrent CNA regions. Lower copy number levels of the 6q23-24 locus predicted absence of pCR in the whole cohort and in the estrogen receptor-positive subgroup. 6q23-24 deletion was significantly more frequent in TP53 wild-type (WT) compared with TP53-mutated, resulting in copy number levels significantly associated with lack of pCR only in the TP53 WT subgroup. Interestingly, a gene-ontology analysis highlighted several immune processes correlated to 6q23-24 copy number.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis identified ERBB2 copy number as well as 6q23-24 CNAs as predictors of response to anti-HER2-based treatment. ERBB2 expression outperformed ERBB2 amplification. The complexity of the 6q23-24 region warrants further investigation.

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors: A new promise for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer represents a heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, including both oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative tumours. A deeper understanding of the crosstalk between ER and HER2 receptor pathways has led to the development of treatment strategies consisting of a simultaneous blockade of both signalling pathways, as a reasonable approach to prevent the onset of mechanisms of resistance.

METHODS

This review was based on the material searched on PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases and on conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 15 December 2020. The search strategy included the following keywords: 'HER2-positive breast cancer', 'CDK4-6 inhibitors' and 'PI3K inhibitors', and was adapted for use with different bibliographic databases.

RESULTS

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors are two classes of agents already approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Recently, promising data with their use have been also shown in HER2+ disease. Results from preclinical and clinical studies are shedding light on the role of these classes of agents in HER2+ breast cancer, and are paving the road for a forthcoming change in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment landscape for HER2+ breast cancer is rapidly changing, and CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors represent a new promising strategy to improve patients' outcomes.

Independent Validation of the PAM50-Based Chemo-Endocrine Score (CES) in Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2-Based Therapy

PURPOSE

We do not yet have validated biomarkers to predict response and outcome within hormone receptor-positive/HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) breast cancer. The PAM50-based chemo-endocrine score (CES) predicts chemo-endocrine sensitivity in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Here, we evaluate the relationship of CES with response and survival in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Intrinsic subtype and clinicopathologic data were obtained from seven studies in which patients were treated with HER2-targeted therapy either with endocrine therapy (ET) or with chemotherapy (CTX). CES was evaluated as a continuous variable and categorically from low to high scores [CES-C (chemo-sensitive), CES-U (uncertain), and CES-E (endocrine-sensitive)]. We first analyzed each dataset individually, and then all combined. Multivariable analyses were used to test CES association with pathologic complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients were included (112 with ET and 345 with CTX). In the combined cohort, CES-C, CES-U, and CES-E were identified in 60%, 23%, and 17% of the patients, respectively. High CES (i.e., CES-E) was associated with a lower probability of achieving pCR independently of clinical characteristics, therapy, intrinsic subtype, and study (adjusted OR = 0.42; P = 0.016). A total of 295 patients were analyzed for DFS with a median follow-up of 66 months. High CES was also associated with better DFS (adjusted HR, 0.174; P = 0.003) independently of pCR, clinical characteristics and intrinsic subtype. In patients with residual disease, the adjusted DFS HR of CES was 0.160 (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In HER2+/HR+ breast cancer, CES is useful for predicting chemo-endocrine sensitivity and provides additional prognostication beyond intrinsic subtype and clinicopathologic characteristics.

Pathologic response of ductal carcinoma in situ to neoadjuvant systemic treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer

Purpose

The presence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) adjacent to HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) is often a contra-indication for breast-conserving surgery, even in case of excellent treatment response of the invasive component. Data on the response of DCIS to neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) are limited. Therefore, we estimated the response of adjacent DCIS to NST-containing HER2-blockade in HER2-positive breast cancer patients and assessed the association of clinicopathological and radiological factors with response.

Methods

Pre-NST biopsies were examined to determine presence of DCIS in all women with HER2-positive IBC treated with trastuzumab-containing NST ± pertuzumab between 2004 and 2017 in a comprehensive cancer center. When present, multiple DCIS factors, including grade, calcifications, necrosis, hormone receptor, and Ki-67 expression, were scored. Associations of clinicopathological and radiological factors with complete response were assessed using logistic regression models.

Results

Adjacent DCIS, observed in 138/316 patients with HER2-positive IBC, was eradicated after NST in 46% of patients. Absence of calcifications suspicious for malignancy on pre-NST mammography (odds ratio (OR) 3.75; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.72–8.17), treatment with dual HER2-blockade (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.17–4.75), a (near) complete response on MRI (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.31–9.64), and absence of calcifications (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.34–7.60) and Ki-67 > 20% in DCIS (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.09–6.89) on pre-NST biopsy were significantly associated with DCIS response.

Conclusions

As DCIS can respond to NST containing HER2-blockade, the presence of extensive DCIS in HER2-positive breast cancer before NST should not always indicate a mastectomy. The predictive factors we found could be helpful when considering breast-conserving surgery in these patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06235-2.

Tumor Cellularity and Infiltrating Lymphocytes (CelTIL) as a Survival Surrogate in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

In early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, biomarkers that guide de-escalation and/or escalation of systemic therapy are needed. CelTIL score is a novel, combined biomarker based on stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor cellularity and determined in tumor biopsies at week 2 of anti-HER2 therapy only. We evaluated the prognostic value of CelTIL in 196 patients with early-stage HER2-positive disease treated with standard trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in the NeoALTTO phase III trial. Using a pre-specified CelTIL cutoff, a better 5-year event-free survival and overall survival was observed between CelTIL-high and CelTIL-low score with a 76.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.0%-85.0%) versus 59.7% (95% CI = 50.0%-72.0%) (hazard ratio = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.94), and 86.4% (95% CI = 80.0%-94.0%) vs 73.5% (95% CI = 64.0%-84.0%) (hazard ratio = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.92), respectively. Statistical significance was maintained after adjusting for baseline TILs, hormone receptor status, pre-treatment tumor size and nodal status, type of surgery, treatment arm, and pathological complete response. Further studies to support CelTIL as an early read-out biomarker to help de-escalate/escalate systemic therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer seem warranted.

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is clinically and biologically a heterogenous disease and not all patients benefit to the same extent from current anti-HER2 therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among HER2+ breast cancer, molecular intrinsic subtypes, PIK3CA mutation status, levels of HER2 gene/protein, immune infiltration, or intratumor heterogeneity modulate HER2-treatment sensitivity. HER2-enriched carcinomas, with high levels of HER2 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are highly sensitive to anti-HER2 therapies, regardless of chemotherapy. Luminal A/B tumors are more estrogen receptor-dependent than HER2-dependent, harbor higher rates of PIK3CA mutations, and are less responsive to anti-HER2 treatment. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity that exists in approximately 10% of HER2+ disease may also cause treatment resistance. Early changes occur during neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy that can predict response. Importantly, HER2 expression is not a binary but rather a continuous variable. Overall, 34-63% of HER2-negative breast cancers express HER2, and HER2-low tumors have become a new entity, for which novel targeted therapies may be effective.

SUMMARY

Although much of what is discussed currently remains investigational, it is clear that HER2+ breast cancer is a complex disease comprising different entities. Future strategies to escalate or de-escalate treatment in early-stage HER2+ disease should consider other biomarkers beyond HER2 and estrogen receptor status, including intrinsic subtype, HER2 levels, and TILs; and evaluate different treatment strategies among patients with estrogen receptor-positive/HER2+ and estrogen receptor-negative/HER2+ diseases.

A multivariable prognostic score to guide systemic therapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a retrospective study with an external evaluation

BACKGROUND

In early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, escalation or de-escalation of systemic therapy is a controversial topic. As an aid to treatment decisions, we aimed to develop a prognostic assay that integrates multiple data types for predicting survival outcome in patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

We derived a combined prognostic model using retrospective clinical-pathological data on stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, PAM50 subtypes, and expression of 55 genes obtained from patients who participated in the Short-HER phase 3 trial. The trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed, node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer or, if node negative, with at least one risk factor (ie, tumour size >2 cm, histological grade 3, lymphovascular invasion, Ki67 >20%, age ≤35 years, or hormone receptor negativity), and randomly assigned them to adjuvant anthracycline plus taxane-based combinations with either 9 weeks or 1 year of trastuzumab. Trastuzumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks (8 mg/kg loading dose at first cycle, and 6 mg/kg thereafter) for 18 doses or weekly (4 mg/kg loading dose in the first week, and 2 mg/kg thereafter) for 9 weeks, starting concomitantly with the first taxane dose. Median follow-up was 91·4 months (IQR 75·1-105·6). The primary objective of our study was to derive and evaluate a combined prognostic score associated with distant metastasis-free survival (the time between randomisation and distant recurrence or death before recurrence), an exploratory endpoint in Short-HER. Patient samples in the training dataset were split into a training set (n=290) and a testing set (n=145), balancing for event and treatment group. The training set was further stratified into 100 iterations of Monte-Carlo cross validation (MCCV). Cox proportional hazard models were fit to MCCV training samples using Elastic-Net. A maximum of 92 features were assessed. The final prognostic model was evaluated in an independent combined dataset of 267 patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer treated with different neoadjuvant and adjuvant anti-HER2-based combinations and from four other studies (PAMELA, CHER-LOB, Hospital Clinic, and Padova) with disease-free survival outcome data.

FINDINGS

From Short-HER, data from 435 (35%) of 1254 patients for tumour size (T1 vs rest), nodal status (N0 vs rest), number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (continuous variable), subtype (HER2-enriched and basal-like vs rest), and 13 genes composed the final model (named HER2DX). HER2DX was significantly associated with distant metastasis-free survival as a continuous variable (p<0·0001). HER2DX median score for quartiles 1-2 was identified as the cutoff to identify low-risk patients; and the score that distinguished quartile 3 from quartile 4 was the cutoff to distinguish medium-risk and high-risk populations. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival of the low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk populations were 98·1% (95% CI 96·3-99·9), 88·9% (83·2-95·0), and 73·9% (66·0-82·7), respectively (low-risk vs high-risk hazard ratio [HR] 0·04, 95% CI 0·0-0·1, p<0·0001). In the evaluation cohort, HER2DX was significantly associated with disease-free survival as a continuous variable (HR 2·77, 95% CI 1·4-5·6, p=0·0040) and as group categories (low-risk vs high-risk HR 0·27, 0·1-0·7, p=0·005). 5-year disease-free survival in the HER2DX low-risk group was 93·5% (89·0-98·3%) and in the high-risk group was 81·1% (71·5-92·1).

INTERPRETATION

The HER2DX combined prognostic score identifies patients with early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer who might be candidates for escalated or de-escalated systemic treatment. Future clinical validation of HER2DX seems warranted to establish its use in different scenarios, especially in the neoadjuvant setting.

FUNDING

Instituto Salud Carlos III, Save the Mama, Pas a Pas, Fundación Científica, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Fundación SEOM, National Institutes of Health, Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the Veneto Institute of Oncology, and Italian Association for Cancer Research.