Mismatch Repair-Deficient Rectal Cancer and Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

A Phase Two, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study With Dostarlimab Monotherapy in Participants With Untreated Stage II/III dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (AZUR-1)

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) had the second highest cancer mortality worldwide in 2020; nearly a third of CRCs were rectal cancers (RC). A recent study demonstrated that dostarlimab, an immune-checkpoint inhibitor, was highly effective in treating mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) locally advanced RC as all included patients had a clinical complete response (cCR) without radiation or chemotherapy. This study's objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced dMMR RC.

PATIENTS/METHODS

AZUR-1 (NCT05723562) is a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm phase 2 study enrolling approximately 150 patients across 10 countries. Key eligibility criteria include dMMR status or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype. Dostarlimab 500 mg will be administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 9 cycles. The primary endpoint is cCR by independent central review (ICR) at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints include cCR by ICR at 24 and 36 months, and 3-year event-free survival by investigator assessment. Additional secondary endpoints include organ preservation rate at 3 years and disease-specific survival and overall survival at 5 years. Efficacy and safety will be assessed in all patients who receive ≥1 dose of dostarlimab. All patients will be followed for 5 years (unless consent is withdrawn).

CONCLUSIONS

AZUR-1 will evaluate the efficacy of dostarlimab immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H RC. Utilizing novel aspects including long follow-up of all patients and standardization of clinical response assessment, this study will provide international multicentric data to evaluate tumor response in an immunotherapy setting and new evidence on long-term outcomes.

Targeting the ZMYM2-ANXA9 Axis with FLT3 Inhibitor G749 Overcomes Oxaliplatin Resistance in Colorectal Cancer

Background: Chemoresistance and tumor recurrence remain major obstacles in colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying treatment resistance is critical for improving therapeutic outcomes. Methods: We analyzed transcriptomic profiles from public datasets (TCGA and GSE39582) to identify differentially expressed genes associated with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in CRC patients. Among 298 candidate genes, ANXA9 emerged as significantly overexpressed in chemoresistant tumors and associated with a poor prognosis. These findings were further validated in an independent cohort of 146 Stage III CRC patients using immunohistochemistry and survival analysis. The expression of ANXA9 was evaluated in oxaliplatin acquired-resistant CRC cell lines via qPCR and Western blot. Functional studies, including RNA interference, colony formation, apoptosis assays, and drug sensitivity testing, were performed in vitro and in vivo to assess the role of ANXA9. A high-throughput drug screen identified G749, a FLT3 inhibitor, as a potential therapeutic agent. Results:ANXA9 expression was significantly elevated in non-responders to chemotherapy and oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cell lines. The knockdown of ANXA9 reduced proliferation and enhanced oxaliplatin sensitivity. G749 was found to suppress ANXA9 expression in a dose-dependent manner and inhibit CRC cell growth in vitro and in patient-derived organoids. In a CRC xenograft mouse model, G749 reduced the tumor burden without observable toxicity. Mechanistically, we identified ZMYM2 as a transcriptional regulator of ANXA9. ChIP-qPCR confirmed ZMYM2 binding to the ANXA9 promoter, especially in resistant cells. Silencing ZMYM2 suppressed tumor cell growth and restored chemosensitivity. Conclusions: The ZMYM2-ANXA9 signaling axis drives chemoresistance and tumor progression in CRC. FLT3 inhibition by G749 effectively downregulates ANXA9 and sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy, highlighting a novel therapeutic approach for chemoresistant CRC.

The neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-metastatic mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Background

Immunotherapy has become the first-line treatment for metastatic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer remain unclear. In this article, we explore the clinical effect and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer.

Methods

We collected clinical data from the databases (PubMed, Wanfang Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases) up to November 2024. The primary outcomes of major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and other outcomes were analyzed for the final results. The secondary outcomes (pCR rates for the subgroups) were also analyzed.

Results

We included 21 articles with 628 non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancers. A pCR was found in 320/480 (66.6%) patients [effect size (ES): 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.74] with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity. A MPR was found in 388/452 (85.8%) patients (ES: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, pCR rates were similar in the T1-T3 group and T4a-T4b group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.22). The pCR rates were similar in the colon cancer group and rectal cancer group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.39 to 5.12). Similar pCR rates were found in the immune monotherapy group and immune therapy plus chemotherapy group (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.10) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy achieves high rates of pCR and MPR for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer. For locally advanced T4 stage dMMR colorectal cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy can still achieve good pCR rates. Neoadjuvant immune monotherapy can achieve good pCRs rates, avoiding the toxic side effects caused by combined dual immunotherapy and chemo(radio)therapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be another treatment option for non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024594173.

Prognostic value of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio and CONUT score in rectal cancer patients undergoing XELOX-based chemotherapy: development of a nomogram-based predictive model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of the albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in rectal cancer (RC) patients receiving XELOX-based chemotherapy, and to develop a nomogram for predicting recurrence risk.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 389 RC patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, along with an independent validation cohort of 120 patients. Clinical variables, including AAPR and CONUT were analyzed using Cox regression and cumulative incidence function curves. A nomogram was constructed and validated using calibration plots and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Both AAPR (HR = 0.073, P<0.001) and CONUT score (HR = 1.497, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of recurrence. Additional factors significantly associated with increased recurrence risk included TNM stage III, tumor size ≥5 cm, vascular invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥5 ng/ml. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive performance with a C-index of 0.860 in the training cohort, and 0.835 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed recurrence probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

AAPR and CONUT score are independent prognostic indicators for recurrence in RC patients treated with XELOX-based chemotherapy. The proposed nomogram, incorporating these variables, provides a reliable tool for individualized risk prediction and may support personalized treatment decision-making.

Significance of homologous recombinant deficiency as a biomarker for drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a substantial global health concern due to its limited treatment options, especially for oxaliplatin (L-OHP) regimen resistance. This study used organoid-based screening methodologies to evaluate drug responses in CRC while validating the approach with patient-derived CRC organoids and investigating potential biomarkers.

METHODS

Patient-derived organoids were created from CRC surgical specimens, and drug screening were performed. Selected organoids with high and low L-OHP sensitivity underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), and in vivo experiments using xenotransplantation were used to validate in vitro results. Moreover, the clinical application of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as a biomarker was investigated.

RESULTS

Organoid drug screening revealed differences in L-OHP sensitivity among 34 patient-derived CRC organoids, and NGS deemed HRD as a potential biomarker. In vivo experiments validated the correlation between HRD status and L-OHP sensitivity, and clinical data suggested the potential of HRD as a biomarker for recurrence-free survival in patients treated with L-OHP. Additionally, HRD exhibited potential as a biomarker for other platinum agents and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores HRD as a potential biomarker for predicting L-OHP sensitivity, expanding its application to other drugs in CRC. Organoid screening is reliable, providing insights into the intricate association between genetic features and treatment responses.

Mismatch Repair Status and Lymph Node Ratio in Survival Prediction of Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Multi-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The microsatellite status (dMMR vs. pMMR) in colorectal cancer can serve as a guiding factor for patient prognosis and treatment, where dMMR status indicates a better prognosis and often obviates the need for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Conversely, a higher lymph node ratio (LNR) is associated with a poorer prognosis. This study aims to elucidate the prognostic significance of LNR and MMR status in relation to ACT in stages II and III colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1946 patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer and were pathologically staged as II and III from three medical centers between 2012 and 2019 were selected. Among them, 1104 patients were included after MMR status was tested and postoperative chemotherapy was administered, along with other clinical information. MMR (mismatch repair) status was determined via pathological immunohistochemistry (IHC), and LNR was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the LNR value and subjected to Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis to assess the impact of MMR, LNR, and ACT on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 6.47% of stage II and III colorectal cancers were detected as dMMR. Significant differences in OS and DFS between dMMR and pMMR patients were observed when the LNR ranged from 0.03 to 0.31, with pMMR patients showing a better prognosis. Stratified analysis with ACT revealed that postoperative chemotherapy did not affect the prognosis within the dMMR patient group. However, compared to the pMMR group, dMMR patients experienced significantly adverse effects on prognosis after receiving postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.05). This result was more pronounced in the stratified analysis based on LNR (0.03-0.31) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating LNR based on the microsatellite status of colorectal tumors provides comprehensive prognostic predictions, enhancing postoperative prognostic considerations for tumor patients. Additionally, our study suggests that patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with dMMR status do not require any adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively.

Discovery of Novel Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine-Based CSF-1R Inhibitors with Demonstrated Efficacy against Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Organoids

Repolarizing M2-like tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) into M1 phenotype by blocking CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling pathway represents a promising strategy to remodel the tumor immune microenvironment. Therefore, the discovery of novel potent CSF-1R inhibitors is of great significance for colorectal cancer immunotherapy. In this work, a series of novel CSF-1R inhibitors were designed and synthesized through rational molecular hybridization strategy and step by step structural optimization based on PLX3397 and BLZ945. Among these derivatives, compound III-1 was strongly bound to CSF-1R and showed potent CSF-1R inhibitory activity. It also effectively inhibited the activation of intracellular CSF-1R pathway and its downstream signaling events. Mechanically, III-1 efficiently repolarized M2-like TAMs into M1-phenotype, and inhibited the proliferation and promoted apoptosis of tumor cells through immunoregulation. More importantly, III-1 showed demonstrated efficacy against patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids and exhibited stronger anticolorectal cancer efficacy in vivo compared to PLX3397, highlighting its potential in the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Total neoadjuvant treatment, non-operative management and radiotherapy-free strategies: New approaches for the management of proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer. A narrative review and evidence-based algorithm

In recent years, new therapeutic approaches have emerged in addition to classical neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): total neoadjuvant treatment, non-operative management, and radiotherapy-free strategy. While the introduction of these approaches in a relatively short timeframe has quickly increased our therapeutic armamentarium, on the other hand it has complicated the decision-making process regarding the choice of the most appropriate treatment strategy for each patient with LARC. Therefore, a tool to interpret the evidence from clinical trials and to translate them into daily practice is highly demanded. In the present review, we address how these new developments are changing the multimodal treatment of LARC and offer an algorithm to integrate them into clinical practice.

T2WI and ADC radiomics combined with a nomogram based on clinicopathologic features to quantitatively predict microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Microsatellite instability (MSI) stratification can guide the clinical management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to establish a radiomics model for predicting the MSI status of patients with CRC before treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 366 patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and immunohistochemical staining between February 2016 and September 2023. The participants were divided randomly into training and testing cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The tumor volume of interest (VOI) was manually delineated on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences using 3D Slicer software, and radiomics features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. A radiomics nomogram was developed using multiple logistic regression, and the predictive performance of the models was evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic curves. The calibration curve, clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to evaluate the clinical application value of the model.

RESULTS

The radiomics normogram combined with history of chronic enteritis, tumor location, MR-reported inflammatory response, D2-40, carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor protein 53, and monocyte was an excellent predictive tool. The area under the curve for the training and testing cohorts were 0.927 and 0.984, respectively. The DCA and CIC demonstrated favorable clinical application and net benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

A radiomics nomogram based on T2WI and ADC sequences and clinicopathologic features can effectively and noninvasively predict the MSI status in CRC. This approach helps clinicians in stratifying CRC patients and making clinical decisions for personalized treatment.

Modern rectal cancer management: A review of total neoadjuvant therapy and current practices

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is a promising strategy for treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and has started to replace the traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This review combines findings from pivotal studies that helped TNT to integrate into clinical practice. It emphasizes the efficacy of TNT in improving the disease-free and metastasis-free survival, pathologic complete response and, according to recent studies, a potential improvement in overall survival when compared to standard CRT. In addition, the review analyzes increased organ preservation by TNT and explores the trend towards personalized medicine with the use of TNT. Additionally, it investigates the possibility of excluding radiotherapy in some subgroups. Future directions include integration of immunotherapy, use of TNT in early-stage disease and determining optimal components of TNT, such as type of chemotherapy and type of radiotherapy.

Emerging therapeutic strategies in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer and the role of MMR testing

Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cancer predisposition, accounting for 1-5% of colorectal cancer cases, and is driven by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Despite established diagnostic criteria, such as the Amsterdam guidelines, Lynch syndrome remains largely underdiagnosed. To address this gap, universal tumour screening has been introduced for all newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, significantly improving early detection. The surgical management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome remains controversial. While extended colectomy reduces the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer, surgical strategies must be carefully individualised based on patient-specific factors. Chemoprevention with aspirin has shown promise in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer, with ongoing trials investigating optimal dosing. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionised the treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High/deficient Mismatch Repair colorectal cancer, offering durable responses and significant survival benefits. In addition, the neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is paving the way for non-surgical interventions, potentially transforming the management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome. A multidisciplinary approach and continued research are essential to optimise cancer prevention, treatment and quality of life for people with Lynch syndrome.

A Comprehensive Approach to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

At the end of the past century, the introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), preceded by either short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiation (CRT), established the new standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Recently, significant advancements were achieved for both dMMR/MSI and pMMR/MSS LARC patients. For the 2-3% of dMMR/MSI LARCs, ablative immunotherapy emerged as a curative approach, offering the possibility of avoiding chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy, and surgery altogether. In pMMR/MSS LARCs, the intensification of preoperative treatments with Total Neoadjuvant Treatment (TNT) afforded three outcomes: (a) a reduction of distant metastases, positively impacting on survival endpoints, (b) a significant increase of complete clinical response (cCR) rate, paving the way for non-operative management (NOM), and (c) the selective omission of radiotherapy following induction CT. The choice of the most appropriate therapeutic strategy can only be made through the shared decision-making process between physician and patient based on risk stratification and patient preferences.

Landscape of Biomarkers and Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: Where We Stand?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a neoplasm with a high prevalence worldwide, with a multimodal treatment that includes a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in locally advanced stages with acceptable pathological complete response (pCR) rates, this has improved with the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) reaching pCR rates up to 37% in compare with classic neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) where pCR rates of around 20-25% are achieved. However, the patient population that benefits most from this therapy has not been determined, and there is a lack of biomarkers that can predict the course of the disease. Multiple biomarkers have been studied, ranging from hematological and molecular markers by imaging technique and combinations of them, with contradictory results that prevent their use in routine clinical practice. In this review, we evaluate the most robust prognostic biomarkers to be used in clinical practice, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and emphasizing biomarker combinations and their predictive value.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancers: therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of response

Approximately 15% of locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) have DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), resulting in high microsatellite instability and a high tumour mutational burden. These cancers are frequently sensitive to therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the metastatic setting. This sensitivity seems to be even more pronounced in locally advanced disease, and organ preservation has become a realistic aim in ongoing clinical trials involving patients with dMMR rectal cancer. By contrast, metastatic CRCs with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) are generally resistant to ICIs, although a proportion of locally advanced pMMR tumours seem to have a high degree of sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we describe the current and emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with dMMR and pMMR CRC, and the potential advantages (based on a biological rationale) of such an approach. We discuss how neoadjuvant 'window-of-opportunity' trials are being leveraged to progress biomarker discovery and we provide an overview of potential predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, exploring the challenges faced when evaluating such biomarkers in biopsy-derived samples. Lastly, we describe how these discoveries might be used to drive a rational approach to trialling novel immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with pMMR CRC, with the ultimate aim of disease eradication and the generation of long-term immunosurveillance.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.

β-blockers and statins: exploring the potential off-label applications in breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers

Despite advances in cancer treatment, current cancer incidence and prevalence still demand multimodal treatments to enhance survival and clinical outcomes. Drugs used in cardiology, such as β-blockers and statins have gained attention for their potential roles in oncology. This review focused on their possible complementary use in solid tumors, including breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. The involvement of the autonomic nervous system in promoting tumor growth can be disrupted by β-blockers, potentially hindering cancer progression. Statins, known for their pleiotropic effects, may also inhibit cancer growth by reducing cholesterol availability, a key factor in cell proliferation. We will provide an update on the impact of these therapies on cancer treatment and surveillance, discuss the underlying mechanisms, and explore their effects on the heart, contributing to the growing field of cardio-oncology.

Node-sparing modified short-course Radiotherapy Combined with CAPOX and Tislelizumab for locally Advanced MSS of Middle and low rectal Cancer (mRCAT): an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicentre clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. However, most rectal cancers are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) subtypes for which PD-1 blockade is ineffective. Radiation can trigger the activation of CD8 + T cells, further enhancing the responses of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer to PD-1 blockade. Radioimmunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic modality for rectal cancer. Progenitor T exhausted cells are abundant in tumour-draining lymph nodes and play an important role in immunotherapy. Conventional irradiation fields include the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, which might cause considerable damage to T lymphocytes and radiation-induced fibrosis, ultimately leading to a poor response to immunotherapy and rectal fibrosis. This study investigated whether node-sparing modified short-course irradiation combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade could be effective in patients with MSS/ pMMR LARC.

METHODS

This was a open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective phase II trial. 32 LARC patients with MSS/pMMR will receive node-sparing modified short-course radiotherapy (the irradiated planned target volume only included the primary tumour bed but not the tumour-draining lymph nodes, 25 Gy/5f, 5 Gy/f) followed by CAPOX and tislelizumab. CAPOX and tislelizumab will be started two days after the completion of radiotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenous infusion, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 oral administration, days 1-14; and tislelizumab 200 mg, intravenous infusion, day 1. There will be four 21-day cycles. TME will be performed at weeks 14-15. We will collect blood, tumour, and lymphoid specimens; perform flow cytometry and in situ multiplexed immunofluorescence detection; and analyse the changes in various lymphocyte subsets. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathological complete response. The organ preservation rate, tumour regression grade, local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse effects, and quality of life will also be analysed.

DISCUSSION

In our research, node-sparing modified radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy probably increased the responsiveness of immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR rectal cancer patients, reduced the occurrence of postoperative rectal fibrosis, and improved survival and quality of life. This is the first clinical trial to utilize a node-sparing radiation strategy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, which may result in a breakthrough in the treatment of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov .

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05972655. Date of registration: 31 July 2023.

Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines.Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance ("Guidance") provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by providers and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more.PURPOSETo provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.METHODSA systematic review of the literature published from 2013 to 2023 was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews, phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies where applicable.RESULTSTwelve RCTs, two systematic reviews, and one nonrandomized study met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.RECOMMENDATIONSFollowing assessment with magnetic resonance imaging, for patients with microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair locally advanced rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT; ie chemoradiation [CRT] and chemotherapy) should be offered as initial treatment for patients with tumors located in the lower rectum and/or patients who are at higher risk for local and/or distant metastases. Patients without higher-risk factors may discuss chemotherapy with selective CRT depending on extent of response, TNT, or neoadjuvant long-course CRT or short-course radiation. For patients who are candidates for TNT, the preferred timing for chemotherapy is after radiation, and neoadjuvant long-course CRT is preferred over short-course radiation therapy (RT), however short-course RT may also be a viable treatment option depending on circumstances. Nonoperative management may be discussed as an alternative to total mesorectal excision for patients who have a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. For patients whose tumors are microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient, immunotherapy is recommended.Additional information is available at http://www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Curative immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in patients with mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer: a real-world observational study

BACKGROUND

Sustained clinical complete remissions were reported in all of 23 mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instable (dMMR/MSI) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with dostarlimab alone in a recent phase II study. These results led to off-label use of dostarlimab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in dMMR/MSI-LARC even before regulatory approval. The present study [STAR(t)-IT-REDUCE] describes the outcome of dMMR/MSI-LARC patients treated with ICI in Italy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Investigator-initiated, observational, retrospective-cohort, multicentric study of ICI treatment in dMMR/MSI-LARC. Patients were eligible if treated with ≥1 ICI dose from July 2022 to December 2023 (date of approval of dostarlimab for this indication in Italy).

RESULTS

Seventeen dMMR/MSI-LARC patients (13 of 17 treatment-naïve) were eligible. Fourteen patients completed 6 months of treatment, two discontinued after four doses and one after five doses because of immune-related pneumonia, social constraints, or non-oncological bowel obstruction, respectively. Overall, 16 of 17 assessable patients [94.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 69.24% to 99.69%, 'ITT analysis'] achieved complete clinical response (cCR). Ten of 11 treatment-naïve patients completing 6 months of treatment had cCR (90.9%; 95% CI 57.12% to 99.52%, 'per-protocol analysis'). One patient with near-CR underwent rectal surgery and minimal residual intramucosal tumor was found. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, no local relapse occurred. One patient developed unconfirmed lung metastases. Two grade 3 and no grade 4 adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The present STAR(t)-IT-REDUCE study documents the immunoablative and curative activity of ICI monotherapy in dMMR/MSI-LARC. Toxicity and compliance issues inherent to real-world practice are limited and do not affect achievement of initial complete tumor response but may limit response duration.

Integrated bioinformatics analysis and validation identify KIR2DL4 as a novel biomarker for predicting chemotherapy resistance and prognosis in colorectal cancer

Background

Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have improved the cure rate and survival period for colorectal cancer (CRC), but genetic heterogeneity among patients leads to chemotherapy resistance and disease progression. Identifying new molecular markers is crucial for improving prognosis for CRC patients. KIR2DL4, a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by immune cells, has shown potential therapeutic and prognostic value in other cancers, but in CRC remains unclear.

Methods

This study validated the expression levels of KIR2DL4 in CRC by integrating multiple public databases and assessed through immunohistochemistry (IHC). We further evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of KIR2DL4 and explored correlation with immune cell infiltration and chemotherapy sensitivity. The role of KIR2DL4 was further validated through functional enrichment analysis. Cellular assays were conducted using CCK8, colony-formation assay and scratch wound assay.

Results

The study found that KIR2DL4 is significantly downregulated in CRC and closely associated with poor prognosis. The low expression of KIR2DL4 is associated with decreased immune cell infiltration and reduced chemotherapy sensitivity. Functional enrichment analysis suggests that KIR2DL4 may inhibit development of CRC by affecting immune cell infiltration and modulating chemotherapy sensitivity. Cellular assays have confirmed that inhibiting KIR2DL4 significantly promotes the proliferation and migration of CRC. Inhibition of KIR2DL4 expression significantly decreased the chemosensitivity of CRC cells to oxaliplatin and 5-FU.

Conclusion

The significant downregulation of KIR2DL4 in CRC, associated with CRC metastasis and poor prognosis, highlights its importance as a potential new biomarker for treatment and prognosis assessment of CRC. Future research should delve into the molecular mechanisms of KIR2DL4 and potential applications in regulating immunotherapy and chemotherapy sensitivity.

Pathological response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and imaging characteristics in dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colorectal cancer

Background

In recent years, there has been significant research interest in immunotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). Specifically, immunotherapy has emerged as the primary treatment for patients with mismatch repair gene defects (dMMR) or microsatellite highly unstable (MSI-H) who have colorectal cancer. Yet, there is currently no data to support the practicality and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for colorectal cancer with dMMR or MSI-H. Therefore, a study was conducted to identify the postoperative pathology, safety profile, and imaging features of patients with dMMR or MSI-H CRC following neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

The retrospective study was carried out on patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC who received immunotherapy at Sichuan Cancer Hospital, with approval from the hospital's ethics committee. The study aimed to assess the short-term effectiveness of immunotherapy by focusing on pathological complete response (pCR) as the primary outcome, while also considering secondary endpoints such as objective response rate, disease-free survival, and safety profile.

Results

Twenty patients with dMMR/MSI-H CRC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy as part of the treatment were enrolled between May 2019 and February 2024 at Sichuan Cancer Hospital. Out of these patients, eight patients received PD-1 blockade monotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, while 12 were administered a combined therapy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1. 12 patients received Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab regimen and 8 patients received PD-1 blockades (2 patients were Pembrolizumab, 2 patients were Sintilimab, 4 patients were Tislelizumab) monotherapy. Additionally, 19 patients underwent surgery after immunotherapy and of these, 15 (75.0%) achieved complete pathological response (pCR), 8 (66.7%) achieved the same on Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab immunotherapy while 7 (87.5%) achieved on PD-1 antibody monotherapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 75%, with 45.0% of patients experiencing grade I/II immunotherapy-related adverse events. The most frequent adverse event observed was increased ALT i.e. 20%. Notably, no postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, neoadjuvant immunotherapy for colorectal cancer may be both safe and effective in clinical practice. Furthermore, the study suggested that dual immunotherapy could potentially increase the immunotherapy cycle and contribute to a superior pCR rate. However, the conclusion emphasized the need for further prospective clinical trials to validate these results.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Upfront Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: The Randomized, Phase III OPTICAL Trial

PURPOSE

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into the mesocolic fat ≥5 mm or T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77]).

CONCLUSION

NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.

Clinical status and future prospects of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized mismatch repair-deficient cancers: a review

Frameshift mutations accumulate in cancers related to mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), which has the potential to produce various neoantigens, representing a distinct subset of cancers that respond considerably to immunotherapy. In recent years, robust evidence has supported the first-line application of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic dMMR cancers, which provoked extensive investigations of the feasibility and efficacy of immunotherapy in up-front settings, including neoadjuvant therapy. Several completed trials with small sample sizes suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy can achieve an impressively high complete response rate, for the first time offering the potential of systemic therapy to cure cancer without the need for surgical resection. However, a difficult dilemma emerges: clinicians are now facing a selection between the standard of care with good evidence for proficient MMR but suboptimal for dMMR cancers and the emerging immunotherapy with promising results but only based on a limited number of patients with shorter duration of follow-up. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the biological rationale and clinical status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with dMMR cancers. Furthermore, I elaborate on particular issues that must be taken into consideration for further advancement in the field.

Perioperative Modified FOLFIRINOX for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignant tumor, and durable disease control is rare with the current standard of care, even for patients who undergo surgical resection.

Objective

To assess whether neoadjuvant modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFIRINOX) leads to early control of micrometastasis and improves survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial for resectable PDAC was conducted at the Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital from April 3, 2014, to August 16, 2021. Pancreatic protocol computed tomography was performed at diagnosis to assess surgical candidacy. Data were analyzed from January to July 2023.

Interventions

Patients received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX before surgery and 6 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. Whole blood was collected and processed to stored plasma for analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels. Tumors were evaluated for treatment response and keratin 17 (K17) expression.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Additional end points included overall survival (OS), ctDNA level, tumor molecular features, and K17 tumor levels. Survival curves were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimator.

Results

Of 46 patients who received mFOLFIRINOX, 31 (67%) were male, and the median (range) age was 65 (46-80) years. A total of 37 (80%) completed 6 preoperative cycles and 33 (72%) underwent surgery. A total of 27 patients (59%) underwent resection per protocol (25 with R0 disease and 2 with R1 disease); metastatic or unresectable disease was identified in 6 patients during exploration. Ten patients underwent surgery off protocol. The 12-month PFS was 67% (90% CI, 56.9-100); the median PFS and OS were 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-40.6) and 37.2 months (95% CI, 17.5-not reached), respectively. Baseline ctDNA levels were detected in 16 of 22 patients (73%) and in 3 of 17 (18%) after 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX. Those with detectable ctDNA levels 4 weeks postresection had worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 34.0; 95% CI, 2.6-4758.6; P = .006) and OS (HR, 11.7; 95% CI, 1.5-129.9; P = .02) compared with those with undetectable levels. Patients with high K17 expression had nonsignificantly worse PFS (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.7-10.9; P = .09) and OS (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.8-13.6; P = .07).

Conclusions and Relevance

This nonrandomized controlled trial met its primary end point, and perioperative mFOLFIRINOX warrants further evaluation in randomized clinical trials. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with recurrence. K17 and ctDNA are promising biomarkers that require additional validation in future prospective studies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02047474.

Deciphering the Dilemma: Choosing the Optimal Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer management has evolved significantly, particularly with neoadjuvant treatment strategies. This narrative review examines the development and effectiveness of these therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), highlighting the historical quest that led to current neoadjuvant alternatives. Initially, trials showed the benefits of adding radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) to surgery, reducing local recurrence (LR). The addition of oxaliplatin to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improved outcomes. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy preoperatively to enhance adherence, timing, and systemic control. Key trials, including PRODIGE 23, CAO/ARO/AIO 12, OPRA, RAPIDO, and STELLAR, are analyzed to compare short-course and long-course RT with systemic chemotherapy. The heterogeneity and difficulty in comparing TNT trials due to different designs and outcomes are acknowledged, along with their promising long-term results. On the other hand, it briefly discusses the potential for non-operative management (NOM) in select patients, a strategy gaining traction due to favorable outcomes in specific trials. As a conclusion, this review underscores the complexity of rectal cancer treatment, emphasizing individualized approaches considering patient preferences and healthcare resources. It also highlights the importance of interpreting impressive positive or negative results with caution due to the variability in study designs and patient populations.

Molecular differentiation between complete and incomplete responders to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, but only 20-40% of patients completely respond to this treatment.

Methods

To define the molecular features that are associated with response to nCRT, we generated and collected genomic and transcriptomic data from 712 cancers prior to treatment from our own data and from publicly available data.

Results

We found that patients with a complete response have decreased risk of both local recurrence and future metastasis. We identified multiple differences in DNA mutations and transcripts between complete and incomplete responders. Complete responder tumors have a higher tumor mutation burden and more significant co-occurring mutations than the incomplete responder tumors. In addition, mutations in DNA repair genes (across multiple mechanisms of repair) were enriched in complete responders and they also had lower expression of these genes indicating that defective DNA repair is associated with complete response to nCRT. Using logistic regression, we identified three significant predictors of complete response: tumor size, mutations within specific network genes, and the existence of three or more specific co-occurrent mutations. In incompletely responder tumors, abnormal cell-cell interaction and increased cancer associated fibroblasts were associated with recurrence. Additionally, gene expression analysis identified a subset of immune hot tumors with worse outcomes and upregulated of immune checkpoint proteins.

Conclusions

Overall, our study provides a comprehensive understanding of the molecular features associated with response to nCRT and the molecular differences in non-responder tumors that later reoccur. This knowledge may provide critical insight for the development of precision therapy for rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib for locally advanced microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer (NEOCAP): a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

PD-1 blockade is highly efficacious for mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer in both metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. We aimed to explore the activity and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 blockade plus an angiogenesis inhibitor and the feasibility of organ preservation in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We initiated a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial (NEOCAP) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. Patients aged 18-75 years with untreated mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high or POLE/POLD1-mutated locally advanced colorectal cancer (cT3 or N+ for rectal cancer, and T3 with invasion ≥5mm or T4, with or without N+ for colon cancer) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1 were enrolled and given 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously on day 1 and 250 mg apatinib orally from day 1-14, every 3 weeks for 3 months followed by surgery or 6 months if patients did not have surgery. Patients who had a clinical complete response did not undergo surgery and proceeded with a watch-and-wait approach. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a pathological or clinical complete response. Eligible enrolled patients who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant treatment and had at least one tumour response assessment following the baseline assessment were included in the activity analysis, and patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04715633) and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 29, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 53 patients were enrolled; one patient was excluded from the activity analysis because they were found to be mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable. 23 (44%) patients were female and 29 (56%) were male. The median follow-up was 16·4 (IQR 10·5-23·5) months. 28 (54%; 95% CI 35-68) patients had a clinical complete response and 24 of these patients were managed with a watch-and-wait approach, including 20 patients with colon cancer and multiple primary colorectal cancer. 23 (44%) of 52 patients underwent surgery for the primary tumour, and 14 (61%; 95% CI 39-80) had a pathological complete response. 38 (73%; 95% CI 59-84) of 52 patients had a complete response. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 20 (38%) of 53 patients; the most common were increased aminotransferase (six [11%]), bowel obstruction (four [8%]), and hypertension (four [8%]). Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in six (11%) of 53 patients. One patient died from treatment-related immune-related hepatitis.

INTERPRETATION

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib show promising antitumour activity in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer. Immune-related adverse events should be monitored with the utmost vigilance. Organ preservation seems promising not only in patients with rectal cancer, but also in those with colon cancer who have a clinical complete response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the oncological outcomes of the watch-and-wait approach.

FUNDING

The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, and the Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Non-operative management after immune checkpoint inhibitors for early-stage, dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers

Surgery is a standard treatment for early-stage gastrointestinal cancers, often preceded by neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy or followed by adjuvant therapy. While leading to cure in a proportion of patients, it has some drawbacks such as intra/post-operative complications, mutilation and life-long functional sequelae. Further to the unprecedented efficacy data from studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instable (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, a strong interest has recently emerged for the investigation of such agents in the neoadjuvant setting. Although limited by the exploratory design and small sample size, trials of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for early-stage dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers have consistently reported complete response rates ranging from 70 % to 100 %. As a result, the question has arisen as to whether surgery is still needed or organ-preserving strategies should be offered to this especially immuno-sensitive population. In this article, we discuss the available evidence for neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers and analyse opportunities and challenges to the implementation of non-operative management approaches in this setting.

Treatment of Microsatellite-Unstable Rectal Cancer in Sporadic and Hereditary Settings

Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal cancer and associated with younger age of onset and Lynch syndrome. All rectal cancers should be tested for microsatellite instability prior to treatment decisions. Patients with microsatellite instability are relatively resistant to chemotherapy. However, recent small studies have shown dramatic response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Patients with Lynch syndrome have a hereditary predisposition to cancer and thus an elevated risk of metachronous cancer. Therefore, while "watch and wait" is a well-established practice for sporadic rectal cancers that obtain a complete clinical response after chemoradiation, its safety in patients with Lynch syndrome has not yet been defined. The extent of surgery for patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is controversial and there is significant debate as to the relative advantages of a segmental proctectomy with postoperative endoscopic surveillance versus a therapeutic and prophylactic total proctocolectomy. Surgical decision making for the patient with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is complex and demands a multidisciplinary approach, taking into account both patient- and tumor-specific factors. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy show great promise in the treatment of these patients, and further maturation of data from prospective trials will likely change the current treatment paradigm. Patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer who do not undergo total proctocolectomy require yearly surveillance colonoscopies and should consider chemoprophylaxis with aspirin.

Genomic profiles and their relationships with clinical characteristics and immune features in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the genomic alteration profiles of cervical cancer patients, examine the correlation between mutation patterns and clinical and immune attributes, and discover novel targets for treatment of individuals with cervical cancer.

METHODS

We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of tumor tissues and blood samples obtained from 45 cervical cancer patients to analyze somatic alterations, mutation patterns, and HLA alleles comprehensively. Additionally, we used flow cytometry to assess expression levels of immune checkpoint genes.

RESULTS

Notably, genes such as AR (78%), KMT2D (76%), and NOTCH1 (62%) exhibited higher mutation frequencies. Moreover, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) was significantly greater in HPV-positive cervical cancer patients than in HPV-negative patients (P=0.029). BMI (P=0.047) and mutations in BARD1 (P=0.034), CEP290 (P=4E-04), and SLX4 (P=0.0128) were identified as predictors of shorter overall survival in cervical cancer patients. Furthermore, the present study revealed significant upregulation of PD-1 (P=0.027) and Tim-3 (P=0.048) in the high mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) cohort. In the elderly cervical cancer patient population, HLA-A03:01 emerged as a high-risk allele (OR=3.2, P<0.0001); HLA-C07:02 (OR=0.073, P=0.02) and HLA-B*07:02 (OR=0.257, P=0.037) were associated with a reduced risk among patients with low TMB.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers insights into the mutation characteristics of cervical cancer patients and identifies potential therapeutic.

Future direction of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Despite therapeutic advancements, disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer have not improved in most trials as a result of distant metastases. For treatment decision-making, both long-term oncologic outcomes and impact on quality-of-life indices should be considered (for example, bowel function). Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), comprised of chemotherapy and radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, is now a standard treatment approach in patients with features of high-risk disease to prevent local recurrence and distant metastases. In selected patients who have a clinical complete response, subsequent surgery might be avoided through non-operative management, but patients who do not respond to TNT have a poor prognosis. Refined molecular characterization might help to predict which patients would benefit from TNT and non-operative management. Specifically, integrated analysis of spatiotemporal multi-omics using artificial intelligence and machine learning is promising. Three prospective trials of TNT and non-operative management in Japan, the USA and Germany are collaborating to better understand drivers of response to TNT. Here, we address the future direction for TNT.

Unraveling the Interplay of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and Micro-Satellite Instability in Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review

Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. This systematic review focuses on the prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations within MSI-H colon cancer. Through comprehensive searches in databases like MEDLINE, EMBASE, and others until 1 January 2024, we selected 8 pertinent studies from an initial pool of 1918. These studies, encompassing nine trials and five observational studies involving 13,273 patients, provided insights into disease-free survival (DFS), survival after recurrence, and overall survival. The pooled data suggest that while KRAS and BRAF mutations typically predict poorer outcomes in MSS colorectal cancer, their impact is less pronounced in MSI contexts, with implications varying across different stages of cancer and treatment responses. In particular, adverse effects of these mutations manifest significantly upon recurrence rather than affecting immediate DFS. Our findings confirm the complex interplay between genetic mutations and MSI status, emphasizing the nuanced role of MSI in modifying the prognostic implications of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer. This review underscores the importance of considering MSI alongside mutational status in the clinical decision-making process, aiming to tailor therapeutic strategies more effectively for colon cancer patients.

Management of Rectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome: Balancing Risk Reduction and Quality of Life

Patients with Lynch syndrome are predisposed to developing colorectal cancer and a variety of extracolonic malignancies, at a young age. The management of rectal cancer in the setting of Lynch syndrome is a complex clinical scenario that requires the expertise of a multidisciplinary management team. In this review, we delve into the approach for rectal cancer in these patients, and specifically focus on several key aspects of treatment. Some unique aspects of rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome include the decision between proctectomy alone versus total proctocolectomy with or without an ileal pouch, the utility of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, nonoperative rectal cancer management, and the management of rectal polyps. Throughout, we highlight the delicate interplay between future cancer risk reduction and quality of life optimization.

Discovery of a Novel CSF-1R Inhibitor with Highly Improved Pharmacokinetic Profiles and Superior Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer Immunotherapy

Blocking CSF-1/CSF-1R pathway has emerged as a promising strategy to remodel tumor immune microenvironment (TME) by reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). In this work, a novel CSF-1R inhibitor C19 with a highly improved pharmacokinetic profile and in vivo anticolorectal cancer (CRC) efficiency was successfully discovered. C19 could effectively reprogram M2-like TAMs to M1 phenotype and reshape the TME by inducing the recruitment of CD8+ T cells into tumors and reducing the infiltration of immunosuppressive Tregs/MDSCs. Deeper mechanistic studies revealed that C19 facilitated the infiltration of CD8+ T cells by enhancing the secretion of chemokine CXCL9, thus significantly potentiating the anti-CRC efficiency of PD-1 blockade. More importantly, C19 combined with PD-1 mAb could induce durable antitumor immune memory, effectively overcoming the recurrence of CRC. Taken together, our findings suggest that C19 is a promising therapeutic option for sensitizing CRC to anti-PD-1 therapy.

Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?

In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua et al, addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians, albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years. The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries. In contrast, in the West, preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision. In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of lateral local recurrence increases, suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile. Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area, an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly.

Facts and Hopes in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: Current Approvals and Emerging Evidence

In 2021 and 2022, two immune checkpoint inhibitors received FDA approval in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several more studies have since indicated the benefits, and challenges, of administering neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to definitive surgery in the gastrointestinal, head and neck, and cutaneous realms. In addition, numerous ongoing phase II and phase III trials are investigating outcomes of neoadjuvant immune treatment in early-stage disease. As such, it is anticipated that more immune checkpoint inhibitors will receive approval for various neoadjuvant indications in the next several years. Medical oncologists, surgeons, and other providers in a multidisciplinary cancer care team will be presented with alternate treatment paradigms and clinical decisions regarding upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment. Here, we describe the current evidence supporting use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for neoadjuvant treatment, ongoing studies, and clinical considerations of this treatment approach.

Personalized medicine for locally advanced rectal cancer: five years of complete clinical response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy-a case report with a literature review

We present a case report of a 73-year-old male patient with a complete clinical response following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of mid-rectal adenocarcinoma. The patient was initially diagnosed with stage IIIB microsatellite stable mid-rectal adenocarcinoma in February 2017. During restaging in June 2017, which included rectoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, a complete clinical response was observed. After appropriate consultation, a watch-and-wait strategy was chosen. During stringent follow-up every 3 months for the first 3 years and thereafter every 6 months, no recurrence or regrowth was observed. After the fifth year of complete clinical response, we recommended an annual follow-up. As of November 2023, the patient has no signs of recurrence or late toxicity after radiochemotherapy. The omission of resection in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and the establishment of a watch-and-wait strategy are currently under discussion as possible treatment courses in patients with complete clinical response. Long-term data on watch-and-wait strategies for patients with a complete clinical response in locally advanced rectal cancer are rare. A clear national and international accepted standardization of follow-up programs for patients managed by a watch-and-wait strategy in the long-term is missing. Here, we report the case of a patient who had undergone a follow-up program for more than five years and discuss the current literature. Our case report and literature review highlights that a watch-and-wait strategy does not seem to increase the risk of systemic disease or compromise survival outcomes in selected locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Thus, our case contributes to the growing body of knowledge on personalized and precision medicine for rectal cancer.

Transforming the landscape of colorectal cancer treatment with immunotherapy: Evolution and future horizons

Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide. Over the past decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown to significantly improve patient outcomes in mismatch repair-deficient metastasized CRC. However, widening the scope of this novel treatment modality has been the object of growing interest. This article will review several landmark trials, while exploring various aspects of this rapidly evolving field, including potential neoadjuvant (or even entirely nonsurgical) and adjuvant indications in localized disease. We will also discuss differences between management of rectal and colon cancer, current and expected challenges (eg. resistance, toxicities, pseudoprogression, biomarkers) and other future opportunities including combinations with other therapeutic agents and the role of ICIs in the treatment of both deficient as well as proficient mismatch repair (dMMR and pMMR respectively) CRC.

Cross-trial comparisons for the adjuvant treatment of MSI colorectal cancer: dare to dream the future scenarios

The remarkable outcomes achieved with neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitors for patients diagnosed with MSI colorectal cancer hold the potential to revolutionize the treatment landscape in this context. Specifically, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in colon cancer and dostarlimab in rectal cancer has led to an unprecedented rate of complete pathological and clinical responses. Notably, these responses have been further substantiated by the absence of relapses, with a 0% relapse rate observed during the first year of follow-up. The significance of these achievements becomes even more apparent when compared to the relatively high relapse rates, ranging from 11% to 28%, observed in MSI colorectal cancer cases treated neoadjuvantly with chemo(radio)therapy. However, it is crucial to exercise caution when interpreting such exceptional responses in oncology, especially within a short follow-up period. The future implications of these findings will depend on how the data mature over time. In this manuscript, we attempt to explore the potential scenarios that may unfold in the near future.

Cold atmospheric plasma stabilizes mismatch repair for effective, uniform treatment of diverse colorectal cancer cell types

Mismatch Repair (MMR) mechanisms play a pivotal role in rectifying DNA replication errors and maintaining the stability of DNA microsatellite structure. Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be characterized into microsatellite stability (MSS) and microsatellite instability (MSI) subtypes based on the functionality of MMR. MSI CRC notably exhibits enhanced chemotherapy resistance, attributable to diminished MMR-related protein expression. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has emerged as a promising treatment modality, demonstrating efficacy in inducing apoptosis in various cancer cells. However, the therapeutic impact of CAP on MSI colorectal cancer, and the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we investigated the effects of CAP on MSI (MC38, HCT116, and LOVO) and MSS (CT26 and HT29) CRC cell lines. We are probing into the products of CAP treatment. Our findings indicate that CAP treatment induces comparable effects on apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), as well as the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in both MSI and MSS cells. Mechanistically, CAP treatment led to an elevation in the expression of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1 and MSH2), particularly in MSI cells, which notably have been proven to facilitate the activation of apoptosis-related proteins. Collectively, our study reveals that CAP enhances apoptotic signaling and induces apoptosis in MSI colorectal cancer cells by upregulating the expression of MMR-related proteins, thereby reinforcing MMR stabilization.

Pharmacological modulation of RB1 activity mitigates resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy leads to poor prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), representing an unmet clinical need that demands further exploration of therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes. Here, we identified a noncanonical role of RB1 for modulating chromatin activity that contributes to oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer (CRC). We demonstrate that oxaliplatin induces RB1 phosphorylation, which is associated with the resistance to neoadjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in LARC. Inhibition of RB1 phosphorylation by CDK4/6 inhibitor results in vulnerability to oxaliplatin in both intrinsic and acquired chemoresistant CRC. Mechanistically, we show that RB1 modulates chromatin activity through the TEAD4/HDAC1 complex to epigenetically suppress the expression of DNA repair genes. Antagonizing RB1 phosphorylation through CDK4/6 inhibition enforces RB1/TEAD4/HDAC1 repressor activity, leading to DNA repair defects, thus sensitizing oxaliplatin treatment in LARC. Our study identifies a RB1 function in regulating chromatin activity through TEAD4/HDAC1. It also provides the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor with oxaliplatin as a potential synthetic lethality strategy to mitigate oxaliplatin resistance in LARC, whereby phosphorylated RB1/TEAD4 can serve as potential biomarkers to guide the patient stratification.

Identification of Comprehensive Biomarkers in Patients With Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Adenocarcinoma Based on Parallel Multiomics

Immunocheckpoint inhibitors have shown impressive efficacy in patients with colon cancer and other types of solid tumor that are mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR). Currently, PCR-capillary electrophoresis is one of the mainstream detection methods for dMMR, but its accuracy is still limited by germline mismatch repair (MMR) mutations, the functional redundancy of the MMR system, and abnormal methylation of MutL Homolog 1 promoter. Therefore, this study aimed to develop new biomarkers for dMMR based on artificial intelligence (AI) and pathologic images, which may help to improve the detection accuracy. To screen for the differential expression genes (DEGs) in dMMR patients and validate their diagnostic and prognostic efficiency, we used the expression profile data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The results showed that the expression of Immunoglobulin Lambda Joining 3 in dMMR patients was significantly downregulated and negatively correlated with the prognosis. Meanwhile, our diagnostic models based on pathologic image features showed good performance with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.73, 0.86, and 0.81 in the training, test, and external validation sets (Jiangsu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital cohort). Based on gene expression and pathologic characteristics, we developed an effective prognosis model for dMMR patients through multiple Cox regression analysis (with AUC values of 0.88, 0.89, and 0.88 at 1-, 3-, and 5-year intervals, respectively). In conclusion, our results showed that Immunoglobulin Lambda Joining 3 and nucleus shape-related parameters (such as nuclear texture, nuclear eccentricity, nuclear size, and nuclear pixel intensity) were independent diagnostic and prognostic factors, suggesting that they could be used as new biomarkers for dMMR patients.

VB-111 (ofranergene obadenovec) in combination with nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal liver metastases: a single center, single arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite stable colorectal liver metastases (MSS CLM) maintain an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Historically, immune-based approaches have been ineffective. VB-111 (ofranergene obadenovec) is a genetically-modified adenoviral vector targeting the TME; its unique dual mechanism induces an immune response and disrupts neovascularization. Checkpoint inhibition may synergize the immune response induced by viral-mediated anti-angiogenic gene therapy. We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor activity of VB-111 and nivolumab in patients with refractory MSS CLM and to characterize immunological treatment-response.

METHODS

This was a phase II study of adult patients with histologically-confirmed MSS CLM who progressed on prior therapy. A priming dose of VB-111 1×1013 viral particles was given intravenously 2 weeks prior to starting biweekly nivolumab 240 mg and continued every 6 weeks. The combination continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were overall response rate and safety/tolerability. Secondary objectives included median overall survival and progression-free survival. Correlative studies were performed on paired tumor biopsies and blood.

RESULTS

Between August 2020 and December 2021, 14 patients were enrolled with median age 50.5 years (40-75), and 14% were women. Median follow-up was 5.5 months. Of the 10 evaluable patients, the combination of VB-111 and nivolumab failed to demonstrate radiographic responses; at best, 2 patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.3 to 10.8), and median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.9). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were fever/chills, influenza-like symptoms, and lymphopenia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Qualitative analysis of immunohistochemical staining of paired tumor biopsies did not demonstrate significant immune infiltration after treatment, except for one patient who had exceptional survival (26.0 months). Immune analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed an increase of PD-1highKi67highCD8+ T cells and HLA-DRhigh T cells after VB-111 priming dose. Plasma cytokines interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α increased after treatment with both drugs.

CONCLUSION

In patients with MSS CLM, VB-111 and nivolumab did not improve overall response rate or survival but were tolerated with minimal toxicities. While challenging to distinguish between antiviral or antitumor, correlative studies demonstrated an immune response with activation and proliferation of CD8+ T cells systemically that was poorly sustained.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04166383.

m6A and m5C modification of GPX4 facilitates anticancer immunity via STING activation

Cancer immunotherapy is arguably the most rapidly advancing realm of cancer treatment. Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) has emerged as the vital enzyme to prevent lipid peroxidation and maintain cellular redox homeostasis. However, the mechanism of GPX4 in the regulation of cancer immunotherapy of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) are incompletely understood. In pan-cancer analysis, we found that GPX4 showed remarkably upregulated expression and exhibited significant association with overall survival in multiple cancer types, especially COAD. Furthermore, upregulated GPX4 expression was positively correlated with increased immune cells infiltration and enhanced expression of immunomodulators. Mechanistically, RBM15B- and IGFBP2-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification and NSUN5-mediated 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modification of GPX4 facilitated anticancer immunity via activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon (STING) signaling by maintaining redox homeostasis in COAD. The risk model and nomogram model constructed based on the GPX4-derived genes further confirmed the prognostic and treatment-guiding value of GPX4. In all, our study demonstrated that m6A and m5C modification of GPX4 may be a promising target for cancer immunotherapy via activating the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in COAD.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Importance

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) account for 15% of all CRCs. Deficient MMR is a predictive biomarker associated with responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid tumors, including CRC. The remarkable effectiveness of ICIs in metastatic CRC has led to their evaluation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of localized disease.

Observations

Multiple prospective phase 2 studies in limited numbers of patients with localized dMMR CRC demonstrate high complete clinical and pathological response rates (60%-100%) to neoadjuvant ICIs, with low rates of grade 3 or higher ICI-related toxic effects. Given the median follow-up of 12 to 25 months in these studies, longer-term monitoring is needed to determine the durability of response and to ensure that oncologic outcomes are not compromised in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy is especially attractive for patients with rectal cancer given the significant morbidity that accompanies pelvic irradiation and total mesorectal excision. Ongoing and planned prospective phase 2 trials will provide further data on important issues, including optimal neoadjuvant treatment duration, ICI monotherapy vs combination, and the need for adjuvant ICI therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

While this review found that early results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized dMMR CRC show high rates of major and complete pathological response, longer-term follow-up data are needed to ensure that oncologic outcomes are not compromised and are ideally improved. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy in localized dMMR CRC represents a potential paradigm shift with implications for organ preservation.

PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update

Positron emission tomography (PET) in the era of personalized medicine has a unique role in the management of oncological patients and offers several advantages over standard anatomical imaging. However, the role of molecular imaging in lower GI malignancies has historically been limited due to suboptimal anatomical evaluation on the accompanying CT, as well as significant physiological 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the bowel. In the last decade, technological advancements have made whole-body FDG-PET/MRI a feasible alternative to PET/CT and MRI for lower GI malignancies. PET/MRI combines the advantages of molecular imaging with excellent soft tissue contrast resolution. Hence, it constitutes a unique opportunity to improve the imaging of these cancers. FDG-PET/MRI has a potential role in initial diagnosis, assessment of local treatment response, and evaluation for metastatic disease. In this article, we review the recent literature on FDG-PET/MRI for colorectal and anal cancers; provide an example whole-body FDG-PET/MRI protocol; highlight potential interpretive pitfalls; and provide recommendations on particular clinical scenarios in which FDG-PET/MRI is likely to be most beneficial for these cancer types.