Impact of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and IDH1/2 Mutations

Olutasidenib: a novel mutant IDH1 inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) occur in about 7% to 14% of all cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The discovery of targetable mutations in AML, including IDH mutations, expanded the therapeutic landscape of AML and led to the development of targeted agents. Despite significant advances in current treatment options, remission and overall survival rates remain suboptimal. The IDH1 inhibitor, olutasidenib, demonstrated encouraging safety and clinical benefits as monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) mIDH1 AML.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines the olutasidenib drug profile and summarizes key safety and efficacy data, focusing on the 150 mg twice daily dose from the pivotal registrational cohort of the phase 2 trial that formed the basis for the US Food and Drug Administration approval of olutasidenib in patients with R/R AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation.

EXPERT OPINION

Olutasidenib offers patients with R/R mIDH1 AML a new treatment option, with improved complete remission and a longer duration of response than other targeted mIDH1 treatment options. Olutasidenib provided clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile. Additional analyses to further characterize the safety and efficacy of olutasidenib in frontline and R/R settings as monotherapy and as combination therapy are ongoing.

RNA expression changes driven by altered epigenetics status related to NASH etiology

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing health problem due to the increased obesity rates, among other factors. In its more severe stage (NASH), inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning and fibrosis are present in the liver, which can further evolve to total liver dysfunction or even hepatocarcinoma. As a metabolic disease, is associated to environmental factors such as diet and lifestyle conditions, which in turn can influence the epigenetic landscape of the cells, affecting to the gene expression profile and chromatin organization. In this study we performed ATAC-sequencing and RNA-sequencing to interrogate the chromatin status of liver biopsies in subjects with and without NASH and its effects on RNA transcription and NASH etiology. NASH subjects showed transcriptional downregulation for lipid and glucose metabolic pathways (e.g., ABC transporters, AMPK, FoxO or insulin pathways). A total of 229 genes were differentially enriched (ATAC and mRNA) in NASH, which were mainly related to lipid transport activity, nuclear receptor-binding, dicarboxylic acid transporter, and PPARA lipid regulation. Interpolation of ATAC data with known liver enhancer regions showed differential openness at 8 enhancers, some linked to genes involved in lipid metabolism, (i.e., FASN) and glucose homeostasis (i.e., GCGR). In conclusion, the chromatin landscape is altered in NASH patients compared to patients without this liver condition. This alteration might cause mRNA changes explaining, at least partially, the etiology and pathophysiology of the disease.

AML treatment: conventional chemotherapy and emerging novel agents

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is driven by complex mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities with profound tumoral heterogeneity, making it challenging to treat. Ten years ago, the 5-year survival rate of patients with AML was only 29% with conventional chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. All attempts to improve conventional therapy over the previous 40 years had failed. Now, new genomic, immunological, and molecular insights have led to a renaissance in AML therapy. Improvements to standard chemotherapy and a wave of new targeted therapies have been developed. However, how best to incorporate these advances into frontline therapy and sequence them in relapse is not firmly established. In this review, we highlight current treatments of AML, targeted agents, and pioneering attempts to synthesize these developments into a rational standard of care (SoC).

Management of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutated acute myeloid leukemia

The emergence of next generation sequencing and widespread use of mutational profiling in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has broadened our understanding of the heterogeneous molecular basis of the disease. Since genetic sequencing has become a standard practice, several driver mutations have been identified. Accordingly, novel targeted therapeutic agents have been developed and are now approved for the treatment of subsets of patients that carry mutations in FLT3, IDH1, and IDH2 [1, 2]. The emergence of these novel agents in AML offers patients a new modality of therapy, and shifts treatment paradigms toward individualized medicine. In this review, we outline the role of IDH mutations in malignant transformation, focus in on a novel group of targeted therapeutic agents directed toward IDH1- and IDH2-mutant AML, and explore their impact on prognosis in patients with AML.

Transplant Eligible and Ineligible Elderly Patients with AML-A Genomic Approach and Next Generation Questions

The management of elderly patients diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is complicated by high relapse risk and comorbidities that often preclude access to allogeneic hematopoietic cellular transplantation (allo-HCT). In recent years, fast-paced FDA drug approval has reshaped the therapeutic landscape, with modest, albeit promising improvement in survival. Still, AML outcomes in elderly patients remain unacceptably unfavorable highlighting the need for better understanding of disease biology and tailored strategies. In this review, we discuss recent modifications suggested by European Leukemia Network 2022 (ELN-2022) risk stratification and review recent aging cell biology advances with the discussion of four AML cases. While an older age, >60 years, does not constitute an absolute contraindication for allo-HCT, the careful patient selection based on a detailed and multidisciplinary risk stratification cannot be overemphasized.

Characteristics and outcomes of acute myeloid leukaemia patients with baseline CD7 expression

Targeted therapy development for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) requires an understanding of specific expression profiles. We collected flow cytometry data on 901 AML patients and recorded aberrant CD7 expression on leukaemic blasts. 263 (29.2%) had blasts positive for CD7. CD7+ AML was more likely to be adverse risk (64.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.0074) and less likely to be favourable risk (15.2% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.0074) by European LeukemiaNet 2022 criteria. Overall survival was inferior (11.9 [95% CI, 9.7-15.9] vs. 19.0 months [95% CI, 16.1-23.0], p = 0.0174). At relapse, 30.4% lost and 19.0% gained CD7, suggesting moderate instability over time.

Venetoclax resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia-Clinical and biological insights

Venetoclax, an oral BCL-2 inhibitor, has been widely incorporated in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia. The combination of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax is the current standard of care for elderly and patient's ineligible for aggressive therapies. However, venetoclax is being increasingly used with aggressive chemotherapy regimens both in the front line and in the relapse setting. Our growing experience and intensive research demonstrate that certain genetic abnormalities are associated with venetoclax sensitivity, while others with resistance, and that resistance can emerge during treatment leading to disease relapse. In the current review, we provide a summary of the known mechanisms of venetoclax cytotoxicity, both regarding the inhibition of BCL-2-mediated apoptosis and its effect on cell metabolism. We describe how these pathways are linked to venetoclax resistance and are associated with specific mutations. Finally, we provide the rationale for novel drug combinations in current and future clinical trials.

Long-term follow-up of VIALE-A: Venetoclax and azacitidine in chemotherapy-ineligible untreated acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax-azacitidine is approved for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on the interim overall survival (OS) analysis of the VIALE-A study (NCT02993523). Here, long-term follow-up is presented to address survival benefit and long-term outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine. Patients with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive venetoclax-azacitidine or placebo-azacitidine. OS was the primary endpoint; complete remission with/without blood count recovery (CR/CRi) was a key secondary endpoint. This final analysis was conducted when 100% of the predefined 360 OS events occurred. In VIALE-A, 431 patients were enrolled to venetoclax-azacitidine (n = 286) or placebo-azacitidine (n = 145). At 43.2 months median follow-up, median OS was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1-18.7) with venetoclax-azacitidine, and 9.6 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.7) with placebo-azacitidine (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.72], p < .001); the estimated 24-month OS rate was 37.5% and 16.9%, respectively. Median OS for patients with IDH1/2 mutations and those with measurable residual disease responses was reached in this final analysis. CR/CRi rate was similar to interim analysis. Any-grade hematologic and gastrointestinal adverse events were most common in venetoclax-azacitidine and placebo-azacitidine arms, including thrombocytopenia (47% and 42%) and neutropenia (43% and 29%). No new safety signals were identified. Long-term efficacy and safety confirm venetoclax-azacitidine is an improvement in standard-of-care for patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy because of advanced age or comorbidities.

Meta‑analysis of the efficacy of venetoclax and azacitidine combination therapy and azacitidine monotherapy for treating acute myeloid leukemia

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of combination therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine with that of azacytidine monotherapy in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Weipu Database, Wanfang Digital Periodicals, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for publications on the treatment of AML with venetoclax combined with azacitidine or with azacitidine monotherapy. A total of 5,271 relevant studies were retrieved, of which 10 were included. Literature quality was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology, and data were extracted for meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.4. The combination of venetoclax and azacitidine demonstrated greater overall efficacy than azacitidine monotherapy for AML treatment. Notably, combination therapy resulted in a higher frequency of complete remission. By contrast, combined treatment and monotherapy showed no significant differences in partial remission, whereas there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of no remission in the combination therapy group compared with in the monotherapy group. The results also revealed a significantly higher incidence of adverse reactions when venetoclax and azacitidine were combined in the treatment of AML compared with the observed rates in response to azacitidine monotherapy. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding adverse events, including hypokalemia and liver insufficiency. In conclusion, the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine was more effective than azacitidine alone, and had a good clinical application value in the treatment of AML. Although some adverse reactions occurred in response to the combination therapy, they did not significantly affect the prognosis of AML. To better evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment regimen, multicenter clinical studies with larger sample sizes are required.

Clinical outcomes of hypomethylating agents plus Venetoclax as frontline treatment in patients 75 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia: Real-world data from eight US academic centers

Venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is the standard of care for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy. To date, real-world data published on HMAs plus VEN have been either single-center studies or using community-based electronic databases with limited details on mutational landscape, tolerability, and treatment patterns in elderly patients. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to assess the real-world experience of 204 elderly patients (≥75 years) with newly diagnosed AML treated with HMAs plus VEN from eight academic centers in the United States. Overall, 64 patients achieved complete remission (CR; 38%) and 43 CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 26%) for a CR/CRi rate of 64%, with a median duration of response of 14.2 months (95% CI: 9.43, 22.1). Among responders, 63 patients relapsed (59%) with median overall survival (OS) after relapse of 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.4, 6.7). Median OS for the entire population was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.85-13.5), with OS significantly worse among patients with TP53-mutated AML (2.5 months) and improved in patients harboring NPM1, IDH1, and IDH2 mutations (13.5, 18.3, and 21.1 months, respectively). The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 9% and 19%, respectively. In conclusion, HMAs plus VEN yielded high response rates in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. The median OS was inferior to that reported in the VIALE-A trial. Outcomes are dismal after failure of HMAs plus VEN, representing an area of urgent unmet clinical need.

Advancements and Challenges in the Treatment of AML

The therapeutic arsenal for the management of AML has expanded significantly in recent years. Before 2017, newly diagnosed AML was treated with either standard cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy (for all fit patients) or a single-agent hypomethylating agent (in unfit patients or those 75 years and older). While assessing patient fitness remains important, characterizing the disease biology has become critical to select the optimal initial therapy for each patient with more options available. FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and CPX-351 have been shown to improve outcomes for specific subsets of patients. Venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard-of-care frontline regimen for most older patients, except perhaps for those with an IDH1 mutation where ivosidenib with azacitidine may also be considered. On the basis of the success seen with HMA/VEN in older patients, there is now increasing interest in incorporating VEN into frontline regimens in younger patients, with promising data from multiple early phase studies. This article focuses on recent updates and ongoing challenges in the management of AML, with a particular focus on the ongoing challenge of secondary AML and considerations regarding the selection of initial therapy in younger patients. An overview of common side effects and toxicities associated with targeted therapies is also presented here, along with recommended strategies to mitigate these risks.

Prognostic value of European LeukemiaNet 2022 criteria and genomic clusters using machine learning in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

This study aimed to validate the new European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria for genetic risk stratification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and to determine the most likely set of clusters of similar cytogenetic and mutation properties correlated with survival outcomes in three treatment groups: intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA) alone, and HMA plus venetoclax (HMA/VEN). The study included 279 patients (aged ≥60 years) who received IC (N=131), HMA (N=76), and HMA/VEN (N=72) between July 2017 and October 2021. No significant differences were observed in survival among the groups according to ELN 2022 risk stratification. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified nine genomic clusters (C1-9) with varying survival outcomes depending on treatment type. For example, C4 (predominant for core binding factor-AML) displayed a favorable prognosis in the IC group, but not in the HMA or HMA/VEN groups. The HMA/VEN group had better outcomes than the HMA group in many clusters (C1, 2, 3, and 5); however, the addition of VEN to HMA or IC did not improve the survival outcomes compared with those of HMA alone in C7 and C9 (predominant for -5, del(5q), -7, -17/abn(17p), complex karyotypes, and mutated TP53). The study highlights the limitations of ELN genetic risk stratification in older adults with AML. It emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive approach that considers co-occurring somatic mutations to guide treatment selection in older adults with AML.

Preclinical characterization and clinical trial of CFI-400945, a polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms

CFI-400945 is a selective oral polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) inhibitor that regulates centriole duplication. PLK4 is aberrantly expressed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical studies indicate that CFI-400945 has potent in vivo efficacy in hematological malignancies and xenograft models, with activity in cells harboring TP53 mutations. In this phase 1 study in very high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (NCT03187288), 13 patients were treated with CFI-400945 continuously in dose escalation from 64 mg/day to 128 mg/day. Three of the 9 efficacy evaluable AML patients achieved complete remission (CR). Two of 4 AML patients (50%) with TP53 mutations and complex monosomal karyotype achieved a CR with 1 patient proceeding to allogenic stem cell transplant. A third patient with TP53 mutated AML had a significant reduction in marrow blasts by > 50% with an improvement in neutrophil and platelet counts. Responses were observed after 1 cycle of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity was enteritis/colitis. A monotherapy and combination therapy study with a newer crystal form of CFI-400945 in patients with AML, MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is ongoing (NCT04730258).

Altered Oxidative Phosphorylation Confers Vulnerability on IDH1-Mutant Leukemia Cells: Is This Therapeutically Tractable?

SUMMARY

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is treatable with inhibitors of mutant IDH and also responds well to combination therapies including venetoclax, but most patients with IDH-mutant AML either never achieve complete remission or relapse because mutant hematopoietic stem cells persist despite treatment. An interesting new study in Blood Cancer Discovery characterizes a specific vulnerability in the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system in preleukemic hematopoietic stem cells from patients with IDH1 mutations that is not present in those with IDH2 mutations; will this susceptibility prove amenable to therapy? See related article by Landberg et al., p. 114 (10).

A Markov analysis of azacitidine and venetoclax vs induction chemotherapy for medically fit patients with AML

ABSTRACT

Although induction chemotherapy (IC) is the standard of care in medically fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), limited retrospective data indicate that patients at adverse-risk may benefit from azacytidine and venetoclax (aza-ven). Our goal was to perform a Markov decision analysis to determine whether IC or aza-ven is the optimal induction regimen in this population. Using the TreeAge software, Markov models were created for adverse-risk and intermediate-risk cohorts. A systematic review of the literature informed the transition probabilities and utilities included in the analyses. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 5 years after diagnosis. Overall, patients at adverse risk treated with IC gained 1.4 QALYs, compared with 2.0 QALYs in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at adverse risk treated with IC and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, or aza-ven gained 2.1, 1.5, 3.0, and 1.9 QALYs, respectively. Meanwhile, patients at intermediate risk treated with IC gained 2.0 QALY, compared with 1.7 QALY in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at intermediate risk treated with IC and allo-SCT, IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, and aza-ven gained 2.7, 2.3, 2.6, and 1.8 QALYs, respectively. We have demonstrated that medically fit patients with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML may benefit from treatment with aza-ven over those treated with IC, whereas IC remains the preferred approach for patients at intermediate risk. Our work challenges the use of the European LeukemiaNet risk classification for patients treated with aza-ven and highlights the need for prospective investigation into aza-ven as induction therapy for medically fit patients.

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent combination therapy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: Genotype signatures for response and survival among 301 consecutive patients

Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) is currently the standard frontline therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML). Our objective in the current retrospective study of 301 adult patients (median age 73 years; 62% de novo) with ND-AML was to identify molecular predictors of treatment response to Ven-HMA and survival; European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk assignment was favorable 15%, intermediate 16%, and adverse 69%. Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients. In multivariable analysis, inclusive of mutations only, "favorable" predictors of CR/CRi were NPM1 (86% vs. 56%), IDH2 (80% vs. 58%), and DDX41 (100% vs. 58%) and "unfavorable" TP53 (40% vs. 67%), FLT3-ITD (36% vs. 63%), and RUNX1 (44% vs. 64%) mutations; significance was sustained for each mutation after adjustment for age, karyotype, and therapy-related qualification. CR/CRi rates ranged from 36%, in the presence of unfavorable and absence of favorable mutation, to 91%, in the presence of favorable and absence of unfavorable mutation. At median follow-up of 8.5 months, 174 deaths and 41 allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) were recorded. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for inferior survival included failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5-4.8), adverse karyotype (1.6, 1.1-2.6), TP53 mutation (1.6, 1.0-2.4), and absence of IDH2 mutation (2.2, 1.0-4.7); these risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR-weighted risk model that performed better than the ELN genetic risk model (AIC 1661 vs. 1750): low (n = 130; median survival 28.9 months), intermediate (n = 105; median 9.6 months), and high (n = 66; median 3.1 months; p < .001); survival in each risk category was significantly upgraded by ASCT. The current study identifies genotype signatures for predicting response and proposes a 3-tiered, CR/CRi-based, and genetics-enhanced survival model for AML patients receiving upfront therapy with Ven-HMA.

Biomarkers of Response to Venetoclax Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent progress in the use of massive sequencing technologies has greatly enhanced our understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathology. This knowledge has in turn driven the development of targeted therapies, such as venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for use in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of newly diagnosed adult patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, a significant number of AML patients still face the challenge of disease relapse. In this review, we will explore biomarkers that may predict disease progression in patients receiving venetoclax-based therapy, considering both clinical factors and genetic changes. Despite the many advances, we conclude that the identification of molecular profiles for AML patients who will respond optimally to venetoclax therapy remains an unmet clinical need.

Venetoclax-based low intensity therapy in molecular failure of NPM1-mutated AML

ABSTRACT

Molecular failure in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) inevitably progresses to frank relapse if untreated. Recently published small case series show that venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine can reduce or eliminate measurable residual disease (MRD). Here, we report on an international multicenter cohort of 79 patients treated for molecular failure with venetoclax combinations and report an overall molecular response (≥1-log reduction in MRD) in 66 patients (84%) and MRD negativity in 56 (71%). Eighteen of 79 patients (23%) required hospitalization, and no deaths were reported during treatment. Forty-one patients were bridged to allogeneic transplant with no further therapy, and 25 of 41 were MRD negative assessed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction before transplant. Overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort at 2 years was 67%, event-free survival (EFS) was 45%, and in responding patients, there was no difference in survival in those who received a transplant using time-dependent analysis. Presence of FLT3-ITD mutation was associated with a lower response rate (64 vs 91%; P < .01), worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-5.86; P = .036), and EFS (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.06-3.28; P = .03). Eighteen of 35 patients who did not undergo transplant became MRD negative and stopped treatment after a median of 10 months, with 2-year molecular relapse free survival of 62% from the end of treatment. Venetoclax-based low intensive chemotherapy is a potentially effective treatment for molecular relapse in NPM1-mutated AML, either as a bridge to transplant or as definitive therapy.

A study to assess the efficacy of enasidenib and risk-adapted addition of azacitidine in newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML

ABSTRACT

Enasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Understanding and Overcoming Venetoclax Resistance in Hematologic Malignancies

The discovery of Venetoclax (VEN) has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the response is heterogeneous with 10% to 50% of newly diagnosed AML patients not responding to hypomethylating agent (HMA) and VEN. Furthermore, up to 40% of responding patients relapse shortly. This review discusses the mechanism of action of Venetoclax and the major mechanisms of inherent and acquired resistance to VEN. VEN is highly specific to BCL-2 binding, as such other antiapoptotic proteins in BCL-2 family induce resistance. These antiapoptotic proteins can also be upregulated via a number of compensatory cell signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, the MAPK/ERK pathway, and mutant FLT3-ITD. Mutations can occur in BCL-2 and BAX proteins, or they can be silenced by TP53 mutations and other epigenetic changes. Changes to mitochondrial structure and metabolism can induce resistance. Key metabolic regulators include OXPHOS and alternative amino acid metabolism. Finally microenvironmental factors can influence VEN responses. This paper evaluates subsets of AML by differentiation, histology, cytogenetics and molecular markers and their different responses to VEN; with spliceosome mutations, ASXL1, NPM1 and IDH1/2 being favorable while others such as FLT3, TP53 and BCL-2 mutations being less responsive. Currently intensive multiagent chemotherapy and Venetoclax combinations such as 7+3+VEN are favored in fit younger AML patients. However, with resistant patients' subsets targeted combination therapies are becoming an increasingly attractive option. We explore the incorporation of non-BCL-2 inhibitors, next-generation BCL-2 and multi-protein agents, other inhibitors most prominently FLT-3 inhibitors in addition to Venetoclax, and other novel approaches for resolving Venetoclax resistance.

Clinical and genetic characteristics predict outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients with FLT3 mutations receiving venetoclax-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease, and its heterogeneity is associated with treatment response. Despite the demonstrated success of venetoclax (VEN)-based therapy for AML, the effect of FLT3 mutations on the efficacy of the therapy is poorly understood. We aimed to compare the efficacy of VEN-based therapy between FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut ) and FLT3 wild-type (FLT3wt ) patients and identify the predictors of efficacy in FLT3mut patients.

METHODS

A total of 266 AML patients (127 newly diagnosed [ND] and 139 refractory/relapsed [R/R]) receiving VEN-based regimens were enrolled in this study. A retrospective analysis was performed, and the treatment responses and overall survival (OS) of FLT3mut and FLT3wt patients were compared. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to examine the clinical and genetic predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

With a median of two cycles of VEN-based therapy, for the ND AML cohort, the FLT3mut group had a comparable composite complete remission (CRc) rate with the FLT3wt group (79.3% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.072). For the R/R AML cohort, the FLT3mut group exhibited a lower CRc rate than the FLT3wt group. With a median follow-up of 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-10), the median OS observed in the FLT3mut and FLT3wt groups for both cohorts were close (14.0 vs. 19.9 months, p = 0.356; 10.0 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.680). For the ND AML cohort, in FLT3mut patients, MRD-positive and RNA-splicing mutation predicted inferior survival (hazard ratio [HR], 10.3; 95% CI: 2.0-53.8; p = 0.006; HR 11.3; 95% CI: 1.2-109.3; p = 0.036, respectively). For the R/R AML cohort, in FLT3mut patients, adverse ELN risk was associated with an inferior response (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8; p = 0.025), whereas NPM1 co-mutation was associated with a superior response (57.1%; OR, 6.7; 95% CI: 1.5-30.1; p = 0.014). CR/CRi predicted a better survival (HR 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8; p = 0.029), while DNMT3A mutation predicted an inferior survival (HR, 4.6; 95% CI: 1.4-14.9; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

FLT3 mutations may influence response to VEN-based therapy in R/R AML patients but not in ND AML patients. Furthermore, clinical and genetic characteristics could predict outcomes of FLT3mut patients receiving VEN-based therapy.

Molecular predictors of response and survival following IDH1/2 inhibitor monotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Not available.

IDH2-mutated near ETP-ALL with aggressive leukemia cutis and brisk response to venetoclax and decitabine

Near early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) is a rare hematologic malignancy, for which second line therapeutic options are limited. T-cell leukemias are also rarely associated with leukemia cutis, which is more often seen in leukemias of myeloid origin. We present the case of an adult male diagnosed with near ETP-ALL, with IDH2 and DNMT3A mutations, suggestive of a myeloid origin, and leukemia cutis. After the patient progressed on hyper-CVAD and nelarabine, we treated him with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and the hypomethylating agent decitabine. The regimen induced a rapid bone marrow response and resolution of the leukemia cutis.

Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent Combination in Myeloid Malignancies: Mechanisms of Synergy and Challenges of Resistance

There has been a widespread adoption of hypomethylating agents (HMA: 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza)/decitabine) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the mechanisms behind the combination's synergy are poorly understood. Monotherapy often encounters resistance, leading to suboptimal outcomes; however, the combination of HMA and Ven has demonstrated substantial improvements in treatment responses. This study elucidates multiple synergistic pathways contributing to this enhanced therapeutic effect. Key mechanisms include HMA-mediated downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, notably MCL-1, and the priming of cells for Ven through the induction of genes encoding pro-apoptotic proteins such as Noxa. Moreover, Ven induces sensitization to HMA, induces overcoming resistance by inhibiting the DHODH enzyme, and disrupts antioxidant pathways (Nrf2) induced by HMA. The combination further disrupts oxidative phosphorylation in leukemia stem cells, amplifying the therapeutic impact. Remarkably, clinical studies have revealed a favorable response, particularly in patients harboring specific mutations, such as IDH1/2, NPM1, CEBPA, or ASXL1. This prompts future studies to explore the nuanced underpinnings of these synergistic mechanisms in AML patients with these molecular signatures.

The approach of HMA plus VEN with or without BMT for all patients with AML

Treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have expanded over the last 5 years. New regimens are increasing the options for patients who previously may not have been offered any antineoplastic therapy. The use of the hypomethylating agent (HMA) decitabine or azacitidine combined with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (HMA-VEN) has improved overall survival in an older and unfit population compared to HMA therapy alone. Delivering these regimens outside academic centers allows more patients with AML to be treated, though support and collaboration with allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) centers should still be considered to determine eligibility and promptly initiate a donor search for potential transplant candidates. Expanding the use of HMA-VEN to younger and fit patients who are also candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC) is being studied prospectively and is not recommended at this time outside of a clinical trial. Retrospective studies suggest populations that may benefit from HMA-VEN over IC, but this is not yet confirmed prospectively. Utilizing HMA-VEN prior to allogeneic SCT is also under investigation, and some retrospective data show feasibility and the ability to achieve measurable residual disease negativity pretransplant. Upcoming prospective randomized clinical trials aim to answer the comparability or superiority of HMA-VEN vs IC in fit populations and its potential use as a standard pretransplant induction regimen.

The future paradigm of HMA + VEN or targeted inhibitor approaches: sequencing or triplet combinations in AML therapy

The routine use of next-generation sequencing methods has underscored the genetic and clonal heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), subsequently ushering in an era of precision medicine-based targeted therapies exemplified by the small-molecule inhibitors of FLT3, IDH1/IDH2, and BCL2. This advent of targeted drugs in AML has broadened the spectrum of antileukemic therapies, and the approval of venetoclax in combination with a hypomethylating agent has been a welcome addition to our AML patients unable to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Mounting evidence demonstrates that molecularly targeted agents combined with epigenetic therapies exhibit synergistic augmented leukemic cell kill compared to single-agent therapy. With such great power comes greater responsibility in determining the appropriate frontline AML treatment regimen in a molecularly defined subset and identifying safe and effective combination therapies with different mechanisms of action to outmaneuver primary and secondary resistance mechanisms in AML.

Single-center, observational study of AML/MDS-EB with IDH1/2 mutations: genetic profile, immunophenotypes, mutational kinetics and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

IDH1/2 mutations, intervening in epigenetic procedures, are frequently encountered in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Knowledge of the genetics, immunophenotypes, and mutational kinetics of IDH1/2-mutated AML can contribute to the understanding of AML clonal architecture and inform therapeutics and monitoring.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 50 IDH1/2-mutated AML/MDS-EB cases of our institution, to identify recurrent co-mutations, immunophenotypes, patterns of co-variance of IDH1/2 allele burdens with those of recurrent co-mutations, frequency of persistent IDH1/2 mutation as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in remission and response to hypomethylating agents.

RESULTS

Most frequently co-mutated genes were DNMT3A, SRSF2 and NPM1. Most cases with co-existent IDH1/2 and NPM1 mutations (11/13) showed an 'APL-like' immunophenotype (CD34-HLADR-). Allele burdens of mutated IDH1/2 were identical to mutated SRSF2 allele burdens at diagnosis and remission, but not always to mutated NPM1 allele burden in remission. We show persistence of significant mutIDH1/2 allele burden in approximately one-fourth of patients with deep remissions. IDH1/2 mutations were significantly more frequent among responders to first-line HMA-based regimens than among non-responders, in patients treated for myeloid neoplasms with excess blasts.

CONCLUSIONS

IDH1/2 mutations are most frequently accompanied by DNMT3A, SRSF2 and NPM1 mutations. NPM1-IDH1/2 mutated AML has a mature phenotype possibly amenable to differentiation therapies. IDH1/2 and SRSF2 mutations probably arise at the same developmental stage of the disease, as their allele burdens covariate. IDH1/2 mutation represents CHIP in a substantial proportion of cases and is therefore no reliable residual disease marker. The preferential presence of IDH1/2 mutations among HMA-responders could inform therapeutic decisions if confirmed in larger series.

Venetoclax in adult acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax is a potent inhibitor that specifically targets B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), which has been demonstrated to be effective in preclinical studies utilizing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines and xenograft models. Significant antileukemic activity was also observed in clinical trials, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other drugs. This novel therapeutic approach has revolutionized the treatment prospects for AML patients with unfavorable prognoses and those who are unable to tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, further investigations are required to establish the optimal dosing, sequencing, and combinational strategies of venetoclax for AML treatments. Additionally, identifying biomarkers is crucial for predicting response and resistance to this targeted intervention. In this review, we provide an overview of venetoclax-based therapy for AML and explore potential avenues for future research.

Hypomethylating agents plus modified priming regimens compared with venetoclax-based regimens based on molecular characteristics for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a multi-center cohort study

Venetoclax (VEN)-based regimens are the standard of care for elderly or unfit patients with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Some single-arm studies have implied that hypomethylating agents (HMAs) plus priming regimens may potentially provide an alternative therapeutic approach, owing to encouraging efficacy seen. However, no comparative data exists yet regarding these two treatment approaches. In this retrospective multi-center cohort study, we enrolled 294 ND AML patients, allocating 167 to the HMA + priming group and 127 to the VEN-based group. Treatment response and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Molecular subgroup analyses were also conducted. With a median of two cycles for HMA + priming group, the overall response (ORR) was 65.3%, including 55.1% complete remission (CR), 9.6% CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 0.6% morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS). With a median of two cycles for VEN-based group, the ORR was 70.9%, including 46.5% CR, 18.9% CRi, and 5.5% MLFS. Response differences (ORR or CR/CRi) between groups were not significant (p > 0.05). With a median follow-up of 10.1 months, median OSs were similar between groups (20.9 vs 16.3 months, p = 0.41). However, VEN regimens demonstrated superior CR/CRi for patients with mutations in FLT3, IDH1/2, and NPM1 compared to HMA + priming (80.0% vs 35.0%, p = 0.01; 90.9% vs 65.5%, p = 0.02; 90.9% and 65.5%, p = 0.02, respectively). In conclusion, HMAs plus modified priming regimens might be a potential alternative therapeutic approach for patients with ND AML, but VEN-based regimens presented predominance in specific molecular subgroups. Molecular characteristics contribute to guiding choice of treatment.

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive myeloid malignancy predominantly affecting older adults. Despite the advancements in new therapies for AML, older and medically unfit patients continue to suffer from poor outcomes due to disease-related factors such as the mutational profile and patient-related factors such as comorbidities and performance status. In this review, we discuss a spectrum of therapeutic options for older patients with AML starting with a historical perspective and ending with therapies being investigated in clinical trials. We review the standard of care treatment options including combination venetoclax and hypomethylating agents, in addition to targeted therapies such as FLT3 and IDH inhibitors. Lastly, we shed light on challenges facing the care of older adults and their representation in clinical trials.

IDH2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia

Advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the last 40 years have been limited. With an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, the advent of new treatment options has enriched the armamentarium of the physician to combat the disease. Mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDHs) genes are common in AML and occur in 20-30% of cases. These mutations lead to DNA hypermethylation, aberrant gene expression, cell proliferation, and abnormal differentiation. Targeting mutant IDH, either as monotherapy or in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or BCL-2 inhibitors, has opened new avenues of therapy for these patients.This review will outline the function of IDHs and focus on the biological effects of IDH2 mutations in AML, their prognosis and treatment options.

Recent advances in precision medicine for acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease, in which treatment response and patient survival are highly conditioned by the leukemia biology. The aim of this review is to summarize recent advances in AML classification, risk stratification models, measurable residual disease (MRD) and the increasing number of treatment options that are paving the way towards precision medicine in AML.

RECENT FINDINGS

AML classification and risk stratification were recently updated by incorporating novel molecular markers that are important for diagnosis and outcome prediction. In addition, the impact of co-mutational patterns is under investigation and novel approaches using machine learning algorithms are starting to be used for individualized risk estimation. Molecular markers are also becoming useful in predicting response to non-intensive treatments. MRD informs of treatment response with high sensitivity, allowing dynamic patient risk assessment and early intervention. Finally, important advances were made in AML therapy, with an increasing number of targeted therapies becoming available and many novel treatment approaches being under development with promising early results.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of AML biology is leading to improved risk stratification and important advances in treatments, which are allowing the development of precision medicine in AML at an unprecedented pace.

Current Advances and Future Strategies for BCL-2 Inhibitors: Potent Weapons against Cancers

Targeting the intrinsic apoptotic pathway regulated by B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) antiapoptotic proteins can overcome the evasion of apoptosis in cancer cells. BCL-2 inhibitors have evolved into an important means of treating cancers by inducing tumor cell apoptosis. As the most extensively investigated BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax is highly selective for BCL-2 and can effectively inhibit tumor survival. Its emergence and development have significantly influenced the therapeutic landscape of hematological malignancies, especially in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, in which it has been clearly incorporated into the recommended treatment regimens. In addition, the considerable efficacy of venetoclax in combination with other agents has been demonstrated in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and certain lymphomas. Although venetoclax plays a prominent antitumor role in preclinical experiments and clinical trials, large individual differences in treatment outcomes have been characterized in real-world patient populations, and reduced drug sensitivity will lead to disease recurrence or progression. The therapeutic efficacy may vary widely in patients with different molecular characteristics, and key genetic mutations potentially result in differential sensitivities to venetoclax. The identification and validation of more novel biomarkers are required to accurately predict the effectiveness of BCL-2 inhibition therapy. Furthermore, we summarize the recent research progress relating to the use of BCL-2 inhibitors in solid tumor treatment and demonstrate that a wealth of preclinical models have shown promising results through combination therapies. The applications of venetoclax in solid tumors warrant further clinical investigation to define its prospects.

Acute myeloid leukemia: from NGS, through scRNA-seq, to CAR-T. dissect cancer heterogeneity and tailor the treatment

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant blood cancer with marked cellular heterogeneity due to altered maturation and differentiation of myeloid blasts, the possible causes of which are transcriptional or epigenetic alterations, impaired apoptosis, and excessive cell proliferation. This neoplasm has a high rate of resistance to anticancer therapies and thus a high risk of relapse and mortality because of both the biological diversity of the patient and intratumoral heterogeneity due to the acquisition of new somatic changes. For more than 40 years, the old gold standard "one size fits all" treatment approach included intensive chemotherapy treatment with anthracyclines and cytarabine.The manuscript first traces the evolution of the understanding of the pathology from the 1970s to the present. The enormous strides made in its categorization prove to be crucial for risk stratification, enabling an increasingly personalized diagnosis and treatment approach.Subsequently, we highlight how, over the past 15 years, technological advances enabling single cell RNA sequencing and T-cell modification based on the genomic tools are affecting the classification and treatment of AML. At the dawn of the new millennium, the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the profiling of patients evidencing different facets of the same disease, stratifying risk, and identifying new possible therapeutic targets that have subsequently been validated. Currently, the possibility of investigating tumor heterogeneity at the single cell level, profiling the tumor at the time of diagnosis or after treatments exist. This would allow the identification of underrepresented cellular subclones or clones resistant to therapeutic approaches and thus responsible for post-treatment relapse that would otherwise be difficult to detect with bulk investigations on the tumor biopsy. Single-cell investigation will then allow even greater personalization of therapy to the genetic and transcriptional profile of the tumor, saving valuable time and dangerous side effects. The era of personalized medicine will take a huge step forward through the disclosure of each individual piece of the complex puzzle that is cancer pathology, to implement a "tailored" therapeutic approach based also on engineered CAR-T cells.

Venetoclax with Hypomethylating Agents in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Data from Real-World Studies

In recent years, the association of venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) significantly improved the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy and became the standard of care after the publication of the pivotal RCT VIALE-A. However, it is still not clear to what extent the results observed in the VIALE-A apply to a real-world setting. For this reason, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies on newly diagnosed patients with AML, ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, receiving first-line VEN+HMA. We then compared their results in term of survival with those from the VIALE-A. Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted from all included studies and individual survival data was reconstructed. We then estimated a pooled survival curve and compared it with the results of the VIALE-A using the log-rank test. We also conducted a secondary analysis including only studies considering VEN plus azacytidine (AZA) as treatment, as this was the schedule originally used in the VIALE-A. Nineteen real-world studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Most of them reported a worse survival than the VIALE-A. The pooled survival curve was similar to that reported in the VIALE-A during the first three months of treatment but diverged thereafter (p-value = 0.0001). The pooled median survival among the real-world studies was 9.37 months (95%CI 8.81-10.5), substantially lower than that reported in the VIALE-A (14.7 months; 95%CI 11.9-18.7). Results slightly increased when the analysis was restricted to the studies using VEN+AZA as treatment (median survival: 11.5 months; 95%CI 10.2-14.8). Survival of newly diagnosed AML patients treated with VEN+HMAs in a real-world setting seems to be lower than previously reported in the VIALE-A, while the effect of VEN+AZA is more in line with expected results. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether this apparent discrepancy is due to the different characteristics of enrolled patients or to a non-optimal adherence to therapy, and whether alternative regimens can provide better results in terms of safety and effectiveness.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Small Molecules in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In recent years, great progress has been made in the therapy of AML by targeting cellular processes associated with specific molecular features of the disease. Various small molecules inhibiting FLT3, IDH1/IDH2, and BCL2 have already gained approval from the respective authorities and are essential parts of personalized therapeutic regimens in modern therapy of AML. Unfortunately, primary and secondary resistance to these inhibitors is a frequent problem. Here, we comprehensively review the current state of knowledge regarding molecular processes involved in primary and secondary resistance to these agents, covering both genetic and nongenetic mechanisms. In addition, we introduce concepts and strategies for how these resistance mechanisms might be overcome.

Olutasidenib: from bench to bedside

The discovery of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the resounding success of molecularly targeted therapies in related myeloid malignancies swiftly prompted the development of IDH1mut inhibitors. Olutasidenib (formerly known as FT-2102) is an orally administered novel IDH1mut inhibitor that entered clinical development in 2016, proceeded briskly through the developmental process, and was granted regular approval to treat patients with R/R IDH1mut AML on 1 December 2022. Single agent olutasidenib, a potent and selective IDH1mut inhibitor, demonstrated highly durable remission rates along with meaningful outcomes, such as transfusion independence, in patients with R/R IDH1mut AML. This review will examine the preclinical and clinical development and the positioning of olutasidenib in the IDH1mut AML treatment landscape.

Building on Foundations: Venetoclax-Based Combinations in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Frontline acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is determined by a combination of patient and genetic factors. This includes patient fitness (i.e., comorbidities that increase the risk of treatment-related mortality) and genetic characteristics, including cytogenetic events and gene mutations. In older unfit patients, the standard of care treatment is typically venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA). Recently, several drugs have been developed targeting specific genomic subgroups of AML patients, enabling individualized therapy. This has resulted in investigations of doublet and triplet combinations incorporating VEN aimed at overcoming known resistance mechanisms and improving outcomes in older patients with AML. These combinations include isocitrate dehydrogenase-1/2 (IDH1/2) inhibitors (i.e., ivosidenib and enasidenib), fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors (i.e., gilteritinib), anti-CD47 antibodies (i.e., magrolimab), mouse double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitors, and p53 reactivators (i.e., eprenetapopt). This review summarizes ongoing trials aimed at overcoming known VEN resistance mechanisms and improving outcomes beyond that observed with HMA + VEN combinations in the treatment of AML.

Efficacy and safety of FDA-approved IDH inhibitors in the treatment of IDH mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in the treatment of IDH-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

We used R software to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials of IDH inhibitors in the treatment of IDH-mutated AML published in PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to November 15th, 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 1109 IDH-mutated AML patients from 10 articles (11 cohorts) were included in our meta-analysis. The CR rate, ORR rate, 2-year survival (OS) rate and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of newly diagnosed IDH-mutated AML (715 patients) were 47%, 65%, 45% and 29%, respectively. The CR rate, ORR rate, 2-year OS rate, median OS and median EFS of relapsed or refractory (R/R) IDH-mutated AML (394 patients) were 21%, 40%, 15%, 8.21 months and 4.73 months, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most frequently occurring all-grade adverse events and hematologic adverse events were the most frequently occurring ≥ grade 3 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

IDH inhibitor is a promising treatment for R/R AML patients with IDH mutations. For patients with newly diagnosed IDH-mutated AML, IDH inhibitors may not be optimal therapeutic agents due to low CR rates. The safety of IDH inhibitors is controllable, but physicians should always pay attention to and manage the differentiation syndrome adverse events caused by IDH inhibitors. The above conclusions need more large samples and high-quality RCTs in the future to verify.

A Phase Ib/II Study of Ivosidenib with Venetoclax ± Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Myeloid Malignancies

The safety and efficacy of combining the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitor ivosidenib (IVO) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN; IVO + VEN) ± azacitidine (AZA; IVO + VEN + AZA) were evaluated in four cohorts of patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies (n = 31). Most (91%) adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached. Composite complete remission with IVO + VEN + AZA versus IVO + VEN was 90% versus 83%. Among measurable residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients (N = 16), 63% attained MRD--negative remissions; IDH1 mutation clearance occurred in 64% of patients receiving ≥5 treatment cycles (N = 14). Median event-free survival and overall survival were 36 [94% CI, 23-not reached (NR)] and 42 (95% CI, 42-NR) months. Patients with signaling gene mutations appeared to particularly benefit from the triplet regimen. Longitudinal single-cell proteogenomic analyses linked cooccurring mutations, antiapoptotic protein expression, and cell maturation to therapeutic sensitivity of IDH1-mutated clones. No IDH isoform switching or second-site IDH1 mutations were observed, indicating combination therapy may overcome established resistance pathways to single-agent IVO.

SIGNIFICANCE

IVO + VEN + AZA is safe and active in patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies. Combination therapy appears to overcome resistance mechanisms observed with single-agent IDH-inhibitor use, with high MRD-negative remission rates. Single-cell DNA ± protein and time-of-flight mass-cytometry analysis revealed complex resistance mechanisms at relapse, highlighting key pathways for future therapeutic intervention. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 247.

Update on Small Molecule Targeted Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

The search for effective therapies for the highly heterogenous disease acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained elusive. While cytotoxic therapies can induce complete remission and even, at times, long-term survival, this approach is associated with significant toxic effects to visceral organs and worsening of immune dysfunction and marrow suppression leading to death. Sophisticated molecular studies have revealed defects within the AML cell that can be exploited by utilizing small molecule agents to target these defects, often dubbed "target therapy." Several medications have already established new standards of care for many patients with AML, including FDA-approved agents that inhibitor IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and BCL-2. Emerging small molecules hold additional to add to the armamentarium of AML treatment options including MCL-1 inhibitors, TP53 inhibitors, menin inhibitors, and E-selectin antagonists. Moreover, the increasing options also mean that future combinations of these agents need to be explored, including with cytotoxic drugs and other newer emerging strategies such as immunotherapies for AML. Recent investigations continue to show that overcoming many of the challenges of treating AML finally is on the horizon.

Clinical status of induction therapy incorporating a hypomethylating agent for newly diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukemia compared to the standard 7+3 regimen

INTRODUCTION

Cytarabine and anthracycline combination therapy (7 + 3 regimen) is the standard care for induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although this intensive regimen achieves a high response rate, it is highly toxic, especially in elderly or frail patients. Hypomethylating agents approved initially for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome had longer survival times than conventional care in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the latest information regarding induction therapy using hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) for newly diagnosed AML.

EXPERT OPINION

For untreated patients ineligible for an intensive regimen, a phase III trial exhibited the survival benefit of adding the highly selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax to azacitidine. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend azacitidine or decitabine plus venetoclax as an option for patients with poor-risk AML, including those with TP53 mutations and AML with the cytogenetic features of myelodysplastic syndrome. Future studies should evaluate positioning this combination as an induction therapy for younger patients eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Without randomized trials, propensity score matching analysis suggested a comparable prognosis between azacitidine combination and intensive chemotherapy. Considering the feasibility of a doublet regimen incorporating azacitidine, a triplet regimen should be examined.

How I treat AML incorporating the updated classifications and guidelines

The European LeukemiaNet recently revised both the clinical (2022) and measurable residual disease testing (2021) guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The updated World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification for myeloid neoplasms were also published in 2022. Together, these documents update the classification, risk stratification, prognostication, monitoring recommendations, and response assessment of patients with AML. Increased appreciation of the genetic drivers of AML over the past decade and our increasingly sophisticated understanding of AML biology have been translated into novel therapies and more complex clinical treatment guidelines. Somatic genetic abnormalities and germ line predispositions now define and guide treatment and counseling for the subtypes of this hematologic malignancy. In this How I Treat article, we discuss how we approach AML in daily clinical practice, considering the recent updates in the context of new treatments and discoveries over the past decade.

An Overview of Targeted Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most aggressive adult leukemia, characterized by clonal differentiation arrest of progenitor or precursor hematopoietic cells. Intense preclinical and clinical research has led to regulatory approval of several targeted therapeutics, administered either as single agents or as combination therapies. However, the majority of patients still face a poor prognosis and disease relapse frequently occurs due to selection of therapy-resistant clones. Hence, more effective novel therapies, most likely as innovative, rational combination therapies, are urgently needed. Chromosomal aberrations, gene mutations, and epigenetic alterations drive AML pathogenesis but concurrently provide vulnerabilities to specifically target leukemic cells. Other molecules, either aberrantly active and/or overexpressed in leukemic stem cells, may also be leveraged for therapeutic benefit. This concise review of targeted therapies for AML treatment, which are either approved or are being actively investigated in clinical trials or recent preclinical studies, provides a flavor of the direction of travel, but also highlights the current challenges in AML treatment.

Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML: Hot Topics for the Practicing Clinician

Over the past decade, our understanding of AML pathogenesis and pathophysiology has improved significantly with mutational profiling. This has led to translational advances in therapeutic options, as there have been 10 new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for AML therapies since 2017, half of which target specific driver mutations in FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2. These new agents have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium for AML, particularly for patients who are considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy with anthracycline- and cytarabine-containing regimens. These new treatment options are relevant because the median age at diagnosis is 68 years, and outcomes for patients older than 60 years have historically been dismal. However, the optimal approach to incorporating novel agents into frontline regimens remains a clinical challenge, particularly with regard to sequencing of therapies, considering the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and managing toxicities.