Abstract 2162: Comparing volatile and intravenous anesthetics in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis

FSCN1 has a potential indication for the prognosis and regulates the migration of HNSCC

BACKGROUND

The study of molecular markers for diagnosis and prognosis is of great clinical significance for HNSCC patients. In this study, we proposed that FSCN1 has a potential indication for prognosis and is essential for the migration of HNSCC.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression and survival association of FSCN1 in HNSCC using TCGA data. We compared the expression of FSCN1 in tumors from primary and metastasis HNSCC patients using QPCR, western blotting, and immunochemistry staining. We determined the migration velocity of multiple HNSCC cell lines using a chemotaxis migration assay. We analyzed the correlation between FSCN1 expression and HNSCC cell migration. We also test the effect of FSCN1 knockdown and overexpression on HNSCC cell migration.

RESULTS

FSCN1 was overexpressed in HNSCC than pair normal tissues and metastasis HNSCC than primary HNSCC. FSCN1 expression was associated with significantly poorer overall survival of HNSCC patients. FSCN1 was potentially associated with immune cell infiltration and migration-associated genes. FSCN1 level was correlated with the migration in HNSCC cell lines. Knockdown of FSCN1 reduced the migration and the overexpression of FSCN1 promoted the migration of HNSCC cell lines.

CONCLUSION

FSCN1 is a potential prognostic marker and a critical biomolecule for the migration of HNSCC.

Screening and Validation of a Carvacrol-Targeting Viability-Regulating Protein, SLC6A3, in Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background. Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is the second leading cause of tumor-related death in the world. Carvacrol was also found to inhibit multiple cancer types. Here, we proposed that Carvacrol inhibited LIHC. Methods. We used MTT assay to determine the inhibition of Carvacrol on LIHC cells. BATMAN-TCM was used to predict targets of Carvacrol. These targets were further screened by their survival association and expression in cancer using TCGA data. The bioinformatic screened candidates were further validated in in vitro experiments and clinical samples. Finally, docking models of the interaction of Carvacrol and target protein were conducted. Results. Carvacrol inhibited the viability of LIHC cell lines. 40 target genes of Carvacrol were predicted, 8 of them associated with survival. 4 genes were found differentially expressed in LIHC vs. normal liver. Among these genes, the expression of SLC6A3 and SCN4A was found affected by Carvacrol in LIHC cells, but only SLC6A3 correlated with the viability inhibition of Carvacrol on LIHC cell lines. A docking model of the interaction of Carvacrol and SLC6A3 was established with a good binding affinity. SLC6A3 knockdown and expression revealed that SLC6A3 promoted the viability of LIHC cells. Conclusion. Carvacrol inhibited the viability of LIHC cells by downregulating SLC6A3.

Lidocaine inhibited migration of NSCLCA549 cells via the CXCR4 regulation

BACKGROUND:

Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that wildly used in surgical treatment and postoperative medical care for lung cancers. We hypothesized that lidocaine at clinical plasma concentration can inhibit CXCL12/CXCR4 axis-regulated cytoskeletal remodeling thereby reduce the migration of Non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) cells.

METHODS:

We determined the effect of lidocaine at clinical plasma concentration on CXCL12-induced cell viability, apoptosis, cell death, monolayer cell wound healing rate, individual cell migration indicators, expression of CXCR4, CD44, and ICAM-1, intracellular Ca2+ level, and filamentous actin level alteration of NSCLC cells A549 and CXCR4-knocked down A549 cells using CCK-8, Bcl-2 ELISA, Cell death ELISA, wound healing assay, chemotaxis assay, western blotting, QPCR, Fura-2-based intracellular Ca2+ assay, and Fluorescein Phalloidin staining respectively.

RESULTS:

Lidocaine did not affect cell viability, apoptosis, and cell death but inhibited CXCL12-induced migration, intracellular Ca2+ releasing, and filamentous actin increase. Lidocaine decreased expression of CXCR4, increased CD44, but had no effect on ICAM-1. CXCL12 induced the increase of CD44 and ICAM-1 but did not affect CD44 in the presence of lidocaine. The knockdown of CXCR4 eliminated all the effects of lidocaine. The overexpression of CXCR4 promoted migration but the migration was inhibited by lidocaine.

CONCLUSION:

Lidocaine at clinical plasma concentrations inhibited CXCL12-induced CXCR4 activation, thereby reduced the intracellular Ca2+-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling, resulting in slower migration of A549 cells.

Lidocaine Suppresses Viability and Migration of Human Breast Cancer Cells: TRPM7 as a Target for Some Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Simple Summary

The local anesthetic lidocaine suppresses some cancer cell lines but the mechanism is unclear. Melastatin-like transient receptor potential 7 (TRPM7) ion channels play a role in cancer and may be a target for lidocaine. The aim of our study is to test the hypothesis that lidocaine affects the viability and migration of breast cancer cells by regulating TRPM7. We conducted several assays to measure viability, migration, and TRPM7 function in the presence of lidocaine. Our results showed that (a) lidocaine suppresses viability and migration of six types of breast cancer cells, but with different potency; (b) TRPM7 plays a role in mediating the effects of lidocaine on viability and migration of at least four of these breast cancer cell types. Our work contributes to the understanding of the effect of lidocaine on breast cancer cells and helps guide its potential clinical application in the surgical treatment of breast tumors.

Abstract

Background: The local anesthetic lidocaine suppresses some cancer cell lines but the mechanism is unclear. The melastatin-like transient receptor potential 7 (TRPM7) ion channel is aberrantly expressed in some cancers and may play a role in the disease. Hence, we suggested that lidocaine affects the viability and migration of breast cancer cells by regulating TRPM7. Methods: We measured the effects of lidocaine on TRPM7 function in HEK293 with exogenous TRPM7 expression (HEK-M7) using whole-cell patch-clamp and fura-2AM-based quench assay. We measured the effect of lidocaine on TRPM7 function, cell viability, and migration in TRPM7 expressing human breast cancer cell lines using fura-2AM-based quench, MTT, and wound-healing assays respectively. We compared cell viability and migration of wild type HEK293 cells (WT-HEK) with HEK-M7 and wild type MDA-MB-231 (WT-231) with TRPM7 knockout MDA-MB-231 (KO-231). Results: Lidocaine (1–3 mM) inhibited the viability and migration of all of these breast cancer cell lines. Functional evidence for TRPM7 was confirmed in the MDA-MB-231, AU565, T47D, and MDA-MB-468 cell lines where lidocaine at 0.3–3 mM suppressed the TRPM7 function. Lidocaine preferentially suppressed viability and migration of HEK-M7 over WT-HEK and WT-231 over KO-231. Conclusions: Lidocaine differentially reduced the viability and migration of human breast cancer cell lines tested. TRPM7 is one of the potential targets for the effects of lidocaine on viability and migration in MDA-MB-231, AU565, T47D, and MDA-MB-468.