1
|
Lustig DB, Temple-Oberle C, Bouchard-Fortier A, Quan ML. Incorporating Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Clinically Node-Positive Women Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Shared Decision-Making Model and Nuanced Approached to the Axilla. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4041-4051. [PMID: 37185419 PMCID: PMC10137272 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Lymphedema remains a risk for 13–34% of breast cancer patients who require an axillary dissection (ALND) and radiation. Immediate lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) may mitigate lymphedema by up to 30% by restoring the physiologic lymphatic drainage immediately after ALND. Currently, completion of ALND (cALND) versus radiation after neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) is being addressed by the Alliance A11202 trial, leaving a paucity of data to guide practice. Our study describes the implementation process of LVA into clinical practice after NAC for node-positive breast cancer in the current clinical context. Methods: We reviewed a prospective database of LVA in node-positive patients (cT1-4,Nany) who received NAC followed by axillary surgery ± immediate LVA from October 2021 to 2022. The evolution of the surgical approach is described. Specifically, patients who downstaged to clinically negative nodes post-NAC were offered targeted SLNB with dual-tracer and intraoperative frozen section (FS). Patients were reminded that the standard of care for any node positive is cALND. Immediate cALND with LVA was performed for grossly positive nodes or all positive SLNs; cALND was omitted for those with negative SLNs. For a microscopic disease on a frozen section, a shared decision was made pre-operatively, given each patient’s differing valuations of the benefit and risks of cALND ± LVA versus no cALND with planned regional radiation postoperatively. LVA was offered as an option as part of our institutional evaluation of the procedure. Results: A total of 15 patients were included; the mean age was 49.9 (range 32–75) with stage IIA to IIIB breast cancer. Of these, 6 (40%) were triple negative, 5 (33.3%) HER-2 positive, and 4 (26.7%) ER/PR+ HER-2 negative. There were 13 women (86.7%) who had persistent axillary adenopathy based on clinical and/or ultrasound assessment, with 8 patients proceeding directly to ALND with LVA. Among these patients, 3 (37.5%) had pathologic nodal disease, and 5 (62.5%) were node negative, confirming the limitations of pre-operative imaging. As a result, the subsequent 7 (46.7%) underwent targeted SLNB with FS, with 3 patients (42.9%) avoiding an ALND as a result of a negative FS. A total of 4 patients (57.1%) had 1 or more positive lymph nodes on FS: 3 proceeded with a cALND and LVA, and 1 patient (14.2%) opted for no cALND based on a pre-operative discussion and received adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Of the 11 patients who underwent ALND and LVA, 1 patient (9.1%) developed lymphedema at 6.9 months following their surgery. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of pre-operative US were 46.7%, 85.7%, and 12.5% and intraoperative FS were 88.0%, 72.7%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: As adjuvant nodal radiation and systemic therapy continue to improve, the benefit of a cALND in patients with the limited residual disease remains unclear as we await the outcomes from clinical trials. In the era of clinical uncertainty, we propose a nuanced approach to the axilla by utilizing a shared decision model with patients, incorporating targeted SLNB with FS and completion node dissection when required and desired by the patient, coupled with LVA in a simple stepwise treatment pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ben Lustig
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Claire Temple-Oberle
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Antoine Bouchard-Fortier
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sigurdson S, Thibodeau S, Korzeniowski M, Moraes FY. A Precise Approach for Radiotherapy of Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:175-198. [PMID: 38175346 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer (BC). There have been multiple recent advances in the delivery of radiotherapy, reviewed with a critical discussion of the evidence from trials investigating adjuvant ultra-hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation for early-stage BC, and the locoregional management of lymph nodes in locally advanced BC. Multiple precision medicine-based approaches have been developed as prognostic and/or predictive for BC patients and identifying biomarkers of radioresistance could help identify patients that may benefit from dose-escalated radiotherapy or radiosensitizers. Radiotherapy after breast reconstruction is an area of current controversy in the field, and we evaluated the decision-making considerations in this situation. The oligometastatic state is an emerging field for many cancer sites based on recent trials investigating ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic BC. This chapter is an overview of radiotherapy for BC, with a focus on recent advances in early-stage, locally advanced, and oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Sigurdson
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Stephane Thibodeau
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Martin Korzeniowski
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie J, Xu F, Zhao Y, Cai G, Lin X, Zhu Q, Lin Q, Yao Y, Xu C, Cai R, Wang S, Tang X, Chen C, Zheng S, Chen M, Chen M, Qian X, Shen C, Li J, Xu H, Xu F, Han Y, Li M, Ou D, Shen KW, Qi WX, Cao L, Huang X, Chen J. Hypofractionated versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation irradiation (HARVEST-adjuvant): study protocol for a randomised non-inferior multicentre phase III trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062034. [PMID: 36581983 PMCID: PMC9438188 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Short course regimen has become the major trend in the field of adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) regimen of 40-42.5 Gy in 15-16 fractions has been established as a preferred option for whole breast irradiation. However, few evidences of hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation (RNI), especially involving internal mammary nodes (IMNs), could be available during the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Against this background, we design this trial to explore the hypothesis that HF-RT regimen involving RNI (including infraclavicular, supraclavicular nodes and IMNs) will be non-inferior to a standard schedule by using IMRT technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is an open-label randomised, non-inferior, multicentre phase III trial. Patients with breast cancer with an indication for RNI after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy are randomised at a ratio of 1:1 into the following two groups: hypofractionated regimen of 2.67 Gy for 16 fractions or conventional regimen of 2 Gy for 25 fractions. The dose was prescribed to ipsilateral chest wall or whole breast and RNI (including infraclavicular, supraclavicular nodes and IMNs, lower axilla if indicated). The trial plans to enrol a total of 801 patients and all patients will be treated using IMRT technique. The primary endpoint is 5-year locoregional recurrence. The secondary endpoints include 5-year distant metastasis free survival, invasive recurrence-free survival, overall survival, accumulative acute radiation-induced toxicity and accumulative late radiation-induced toxicity, cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (version 2018-95-3) and approvals from ethical committee of each participating centre have also been obtained. Research findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03829553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinrong Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Feifei Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yutian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Lin
- Yat-Sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Centre, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiwei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Shubei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuying Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Siyue Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Mei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofang Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunhong Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Li
- Clinical Research Centre, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong university School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Haoping Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yimin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun Wei Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Centre, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaobo Huang
- Yat-Sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Centre, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harrison B. Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer. Semin Diagn Pathol 2022; 39:355-366. [PMID: 35803776 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer has been impacted by the publication of practicing changing trials over the last decade. With evidence from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial to suggest that there is no significant benefit to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-stage breast cancer patients with up to 2 positive SLNs, the rate of ALND, and in turn, intraoperative evaluation of SLNs has significantly decreased. It is of limited clinical significance to pursue multiple levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry to detect occult small metastases, such as isolated tumor cells and micrometastases, in this setting. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, who represent a population with more extensive disease and aggressive tumor biology, were not included in Z0011 and similar trials, and thus, the evidence cannot be extrapolated to them. Recent trials have supported the safety and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in these patients when clinically node negative at the time of surgery. ALND remains the standard of care for any amount of residual disease in the SLNs and intraoperative evaluation of SLNs is still of value for real time surgical decision making. Given the potential prognostic significance of residual small metastases in treated lymph nodes, as well as the decreased false negative rate with the use of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC), it may be reasonable to maintain a low threshold for the use of cytokeratin IHC in post-neoadjuvant cases. Further recommendations for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy await outcomes data from ongoing clinical trials. This review will provide an evidence-based discussion of best practices in SLN evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Harrison
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Management of the axilla in T1-2N1 breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:69. [PMID: 35637226 PMCID: PMC9151923 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00432-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
6
|
Le-Petross HT, Slanetz PJ, Lewin AA, Bao J, Dibble EH, Golshan M, Hayward JH, Kubicky CD, Leitch AM, Newell MS, Prifti C, Sanford MF, Scheel JR, Sharpe RE, Weinstein SP, Moy L. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of the Axilla. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S87-S113. [PMID: 35550807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This publication reviews the current evidence supporting the imaging approach of the axilla in various scenarios with broad differential diagnosis ranging from inflammatory to malignant etiologies. Controversies on the management of axillary adenopathy results in disagreement on the appropriate axillary imaging tests. Ultrasound is often the appropriate initial imaging test in several clinical scenarios. Clinical information (such as age, physical examinations, risk factors) and concurrent complete breast evaluation with mammogram, tomosynthesis, or MRI impact the type of initial imaging test for the axilla. Several impactful clinical trials demonstrated that selected patient's population can received sentinel lymph node biopsy instead of axillary lymph node dissection with similar overall survival, and axillary lymph node dissection is a safe alternative as the nodal staging procedure for clinically node negative patients or even for some node positive patients with limited nodal tumor burden. This approach is not universally accepted, which adversely affect the type of imaging tests considered appropriate for axilla. This document is focused on the initial imaging of the axilla in various scenarios, with the understanding that concurrent or subsequent additional tests may also be performed for the breast. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Huong T Le-Petross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Director of Breast MRI.
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Panel Chair, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Vice Chair of Academic Affairs, Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center; Associate Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology Residency, Boston Medical Center; Program Director, Early Career Faculty Development Program, Boston University Medical Campus; Co-Director, Academic Writing Program, Boston University Medical Group; President, Massachusetts Radiological Society; Vice President, Association of University Radiologists
| | - Alana A Lewin
- Panel Vice-Chair, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Associate Program Director, Breast Imaging Fellowship, NYU Langone Medical Center
| | - Jean Bao
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Society of Surgical Oncology
| | | | - Mehra Golshan
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut; American College of Surgeons; Deputy CMO for Surgical Services and Breast Program Director, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale; Executive Vice Chair for Surgery, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Jessica H Hayward
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Co-Fellowship Direction, Breast Imaging Fellowship
| | | | - A Marilyn Leitch
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; Interim Director, Division of Breast Imaging at Emory; ACR: Chair of BI-RADS; Chair of PP/TS
| | - Christine Prifti
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Primary care physician
| | | | | | | | - Susan P Weinstein
- Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Associate Chief of Radiology, San Francisco VA Health Systems
| | - Linda Moy
- Specialty Chair, NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York; Chair of ACR Practice Parameter for Breast Imaging, Chair ACR NMD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piltin MA, Boughey JC. Axillary Management: How Has Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Changed Our Surgical Approach? CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00442-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Senkus E, Cardoso MJ, Kaidar-Person O, Łacko A, Meattini I, Poortmans P. De-escalation of axillary irradiation for early breast cancer - Has the time come? Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 101:102297. [PMID: 34656018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy, initially in clinically node-negative and subsequently in patients presenting with involved axilla and downstaged by primary systemic therapy, allowed for significant decrease in morbidity compared to axillary lymph node dissection. Concurrently, regional nodal irradiation was demonstrated to improve outcomes in most node-positive patients. Additionally, over the last decades, introduction of more effective systemic therapies has resulted in improvements not only at distant sites, but also in locoregional control, creating space for de-escalation of locoregional treatments. We discuss the data on de-escalation in axillary surgery and irradiation, both in patients undergoing upfront surgery and primary systemic therapy, with special emphasis on the feasibility of omission of nodal irradiation in patients undergoing primary systemic therapy. In view of the accumulating evidence, omission of axillary irradiation may be considered in clinically node-positive patients converting after primary systemic therapy to pathologically negative nodes on sentinel lymph node biopsy (preferably also with in-breast pCR), presenting with lower initial nodal stage, older age and were treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation. Omission of regional nodal irradiation in patients with aggressive tumor phenotypes achieving a pCR is under investigation. In patients undergoing preoperative endocrine therapy the adoption of axillary management strategies utilized in case of upfront surgery seems more suitable than those used in post chemotherapy-based primary systemic therapy setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Maria Joao Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Av Brasilia, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal; Nova Medical School, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, at Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Ramat Gan 52662, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands; The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 6997801, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Aleksandra Łacko
- Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland; Department of Clinical Oncology, Breast Unit, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre, plac Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Building S. Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kantor O, Chang C, Yao K, Boughey J, Roland C, Francescatti AB, Blair S, Dickson Witmer D, Hunt KK, Nelson H, Weiss A, Oseni T. Uptake of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at Minority Serving Cancer Centers. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4995-5004. [PMID: 33423122 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09533-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most minorities receive cancer care at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) that have been associated with disparate treatment between Black and White patients. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to examine the uptake of clinical trials that have changed axillary management in breast cancer patients at MSH and non-MSH cancer centers. METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients eligible for the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 and Z1071 trials, and mastectomy patients fulfilling the European AMAROS trial. Uptake of trial results (omission of axillary lymph node dissection) was analyzed between patients treated at MSHs and non-MSHs and adjusted for patient, tumor, and facility factors. MSHs were defined as the top decile of hospitals according to the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients treated. RESULTS Of 7167 patients eligible for Z0011, 4546 for Z0171, and 9433 for AMAROS from 2015 to 2016, clinical trial uptake was seen in 1195 (74.6%) MSH and 4056 (72.9%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.173) for Z0011, 588 (41.9%) MSH and 1366 (43.5%) non-MSH patients for Z1071 (p = 0.302), and 272 (11.7%) MSH and 996 (14.0%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.005) for AMAROS. On adjusted analyses, MSH status was not significant for uptake of any of the three trials. Black race, socioeconomic status, and insurance were not associated with clinical trial uptake. CONCLUSION The uptake of three landmark clinical trials of axillary management in breast cancer was not different at MSH and non-MSH centers despite adjustment for social determinants of health. At the Commission on Cancer-accredited centers in this analysis, MSH status did not affect the uptake of evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kantor
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cecilia Chang
- Research Institute, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Katharine Yao
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.,American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Judy Boughey
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christina Roland
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sarah Blair
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Diana Dickson Witmer
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Helen F Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heidi Nelson
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tawakalitu Oseni
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
To B, Isaac D, Andrechek ER. Studying Lymphatic Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Current Models, Strategies, and Clinical Perspectives. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2020; 25:191-203. [PMID: 33034778 DOI: 10.1007/s10911-020-09460-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Although early detection has significantly decreased breast cancer mortality, patients diagnosed with distant metastasis still have a very poor prognosis. The most common site that breast cancer spreads to are local lymph nodes. Therefore, the presence of lymph node metastasis remains one of most important prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. Given its significant clinical implications, increased efforts have been dedicated to better understand the molecular mechanism governing lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. The identification of lymphatic-specific biomarkers, including podoplanin and LYVE-1, has propelled the field of lymphatic metastasis forward. In addition, several animal models such as cell line-derived xenografts, patient-derived xenografts, and spontaneous tumor models have been developed to recreate the process of lymphatic metastasis. Moreover, the incorporation of various -omic platforms have provided further insight into the genetic drivers facilitating lymphatic metastasis, as well as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Here, we highlight various models of lymphatic metastasis, their potential pitfalls, and other tools available to study lymphatic metastasis including imaging modalities and -omic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana To
- Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Isaac
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, MSU Breslin Cancer Center, Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Eran R Andrechek
- Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haussmann J, Corradini S, Nestle-Kraemling C, Bölke E, Njanang FJD, Tamaskovics B, Orth K, Ruckhaeberle E, Fehm T, Mohrmann S, Simiantonakis I, Budach W, Matuschek C. Recent advances in radiotherapy of breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:71. [PMID: 32228654 PMCID: PMC7106718 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01501-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Regional lymph node irradiation in younger trials seems to provide superior target coverage as well as a reduction in long-term toxicity resulting in a small benefit in the overall survival rate. For partial breast irradiation there are now two large trials available which support the role of partial breast irradiation in low risk breast cancer patients. Multiple randomized trials have established that a sequentially applied dose to the tumor bed improves local control with the cost of worse cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Haussmann
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Nestle-Kraemling
- Department of Gynecologic and Obstetrics, Evanglisches Krankenhaus Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Edwin Bölke
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | | | - Bálint Tamaskovics
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Klaus Orth
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhaeberle
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Svjetlana Mohrmann
- Department of Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ioannis Simiantonakis
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katz MS, McCall L, Ballman K, Jagsi R, Haffty BG, Giuliano AE. Nomogram-based estimate of axillary nodal involvement in ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance): validation and association with radiation protocol variations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:429-436. [PMID: 32043193 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05555-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A substantial proportion of patients enrolled on ACOSOG Z0011 received protocol-deviant radiation treatment. It is currently unknown whether these deviations involved the use of more extensive fields in patients at higher nomogram-predicted risk. METHODS We used the M.D. Anderson (MDA) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering (MSK) nomograms to estimate risk of additional positive axillary nodes using surgical pathology information. In the control arm, we compared axillary dissection (AD) findings to nomogram-predicted estimates for validation. We used logistic regression to evaluate whether nomogram-estimated higher risk of nodal involvement was associated with high tangent (HT) or supraclavicular (SCV) radiation fields for patients with known radiation field design. RESULTS 552/856 (64.5%) had complete details for the MDA nomogram. Mean MDA risk estimate in both treatment arms was 23.8%. Estimated risk for patients on the AD arm with positive nodes was 25.9%. Higher risk estimate was associated with additional positive nodes in the AD arm (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, p < 0.0001). We observed significant association with higher MDA nomogram-estimated risk and SCV radiation (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10, p < 0.0001) but not HT (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.02, p = 0.52) The MSK nomogram had similar associations. CONCLUSION MDA and MSK nomogram risk estimates were associated with lymph node risk in ACOSOG Z0011. Radiation oncologists' use of differing radiation fields were associated with treating higher risk patients. ClinicalTrials.gov id: NCT00003854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Katz
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, 295 Varnum Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA.
| | - Linda McCall
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karla Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Armando E Giuliano
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barrio AV, Downs-Canner S, Edelweiss M, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS, Gemignani ML, Pilewskie ML, Plitas G, El-Tamer M, Kirstein L, Capko D, Patil S, Morrow M. Microscopic Extracapsular Extension in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Does Not Mandate Axillary Dissection in Z0011-Eligible Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1617-1624. [PMID: 31820212 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08104-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the ACOSOG (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group) Z0011 trial and the AMAROS (After Mapping of the Axilla: Radiotherapy or Surgery?) trial, matted nodes with gross extracapsular extension (ECE), a risk factor for locoregional recurrence, were an indication for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), but the effect of microscopic ECE (mECE) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) on recurrence was not examined. METHODS Between 2010 and 2017, 811 patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and SLN metastasis were prospectively managed according to Z0011 criteria, with ALND for those with more than two positive SLNs or gross ECE. Management of mECE was not specified. In this study, we compare outcomes of patients with one to two positive SLNs with and without mECE, treated with SLN biopsy alone (n = 685). RESULTS Median patient age was 58 years, and median tumor size was 1.7 cm. mECE was identified in 210 (31%) patients. Patients with mECE were older, had larger tumors, and were more likely to be hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative, have two positive SLNs, and receive nodal radiation. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no isolated axillary failures were observed. There were 11 nodal recurrences; two supraclavicular ± axillary, four synchronous with breast, and five with distant failure. The five-year rate of any nodal recurrence was 1.6% and did not differ by mECE (2.3% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.84). No differences were observed in local (p = 0.08) or distant (p = 0.31) recurrence rates by mECE status. CONCLUSIONS In Z0011-eligible patients, nodal recurrence rates in patients with mECE are low after treatment with SLN biopsy alone, even in the absence of routine nodal radiation. The presence of mECE should not be considered a routine indication for ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea V Barrio
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Stephanie Downs-Canner
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcia Edelweiss
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly J Van Zee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hiram S Cody
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary L Gemignani
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa L Pilewskie
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - George Plitas
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahmoud El-Tamer
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurie Kirstein
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Capko
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sujata Patil
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Radiation Oncologist’s Guide to Axillary Management in Breast Cancer: a Walk Through the Trials. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2019; 11:293-302. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00330-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
15
|
The Basics of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Anatomical and Pathophysiological Considerations and Clinical Aspects. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:3415630. [PMID: 31467535 PMCID: PMC6699370 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3415630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the first node to receive the drainage directly from a tumor. Detection and pathological examination of the SLN is an important oncological procedure that minimizes morbidity related to extensive nodal dissection. SLN biopsy was first reported in 1960 but took approximately 40 years to come into general practice following reports of good outcomes in patients with melanoma. After many years of observation and research on its use in various malignancies SLN biopsy has become the standard surgical treatment in patients with malignant melanoma, breast, vulvar, and cervical cancers. Along with the introduction of new technologies, such as the fluorescent dyes indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIR), and pathologic ultrastaging, SLN detection rate has increased and false-negative rate has decreased. This literature review aimed to present an overview of the basic concepts and clinical aspects of SLN biopsy in the light of the current research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sener SF. Advances in axillary surgery for breast cancer 2019. J Surg Oncol 2019; 121:20-24. [PMID: 31240726 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 25 years, modifications in systemic and radiation therapy for breast cancer have led to significant reductions in the risk of regional recurrence. During the same time, surgeons have demonstrated that it is safe to forego axillary dissections for patients with low burdens of axillary lymph node disease. When these advances are added to those by reconstructive microsurgeons, the promise of reducing morbidity rates from posttreatment lymphedema seems within our grasp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F Sener
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and USC (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|