Amlodipine: effective for treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy

Sensitive and effective method with 96-well plate for determination of levamlodipine in human plasma using LC-MS/MS

we developed an effective protein precipitation method for determination of levamlodipine in human plasma using LC-MS/MS. Sample extraction was carried out by using liquid-liquid extraction in 96-well plate format. (S)-Amlodipine-d4 was used as internal standard (IS). The chromatographic separation was achieved using Philomen Chiral MX (2) column (3 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm). Mobile phase A was comprised of Acetonitrile (ACN), Mono ethanol amine (MEA) and Iso-Propyl alcohol (IPA) (1000:1:10, v/v/v), Mobile phase B was IPA-ACN (2:1, v/v). The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The total run time of each sample was 4.0 min with gradient elution. LC-MS/MS spectra were generated in positive ion mode, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used to detect the following transitions: m/z 409.20 → 238.15 for levamlodipine and 415.25 → 240.20 for (S)-Amlodipine-d4 (the IS). The method was linear from 50 to 10000 pg/mL（R2＝0.9988489）,and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50 pg/mL. This method was applied to a bioequivalence study of levamlodipine.

Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in health and disease: mechanisms and therapeutic potential

Left ventricular hypertrophy is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although reverse ventricular remodelling was long thought to be irreversible, evidence from the past three decades indicates that this process is possible with many existing heart disease therapies. The regression of pathological hypertrophy is associated with improved cardiac function, quality of life and long-term health outcomes. However, less than 50% of patients respond favourably to most therapies, and the reversibility of remodelling is influenced by many factors, including age, sex, BMI and disease aetiology. Cardiac hypertrophy also occurs in physiological settings, including pregnancy and exercise, although in these cases, hypertrophy is associated with normal or improved ventricular function and is completely reversible postpartum or with cessation of training. Studies over the past decade have identified the molecular features of hypertrophy regression in health and disease settings, which include modulation of protein synthesis, microRNAs, metabolism and protein degradation pathways. In this Review, we summarize the evidence for hypertrophy regression in patients with current first-line pharmacological and surgical interventions. We further discuss the molecular features of reverse remodelling identified in cell and animal models, highlighting remaining knowledge gaps and the essential questions for future investigation towards the goal of designing specific therapies to promote regression of pathological hypertrophy.

Long-term effect of the perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination on left ventricular hypertrophy in outpatient hypertensive subjects

BACKGROUND

Most antihypertensive drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy reduce the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). However, little is known about the effects on LVMI of a triple fixed-dose combination (TFC) therapy, containing in a single pill an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker (CCB).

METHODS

In this prospective open-label study, 92 patients with essential hypertension were randomized to treatment with a TFC of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine at different doses or a triple free combination therapy (FCT) including ACEI/diuretic/CCB. Office blood pressure (BP) measurement, 24 h-ambulatory BP monitoring and echocardiography were performed at baseline and during a 14-month follow-up. The BP variability (BPV) over 24 h was calculated as ± standard deviation of the daytime systolic BP. Differences between office and monitored BP and LVMI were evaluated by ANOVA for repeated measures.

RESULTS

A significant BP-lowering effect was observed for both treatments. At follow-up, BPV was reduced in both the treatment groups vs. the baseline (14.0±1.5 vs. 17.0±1.8 and 16.2±2.1 vs. 17.6±2.3, respectively), but it was lower in the TFC vs. the FCT group (14.0±1.5 vs. 16.1±2.2, P < 0.05). LVMI was lower in both the treatment groups, but the change was greater for TFC vs. FCT (-8.3±4.9% vs. -2.0 ±2.1%, P < 0.0001). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression was greater in the TFC vs. the FCT group (43.5% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Independently of BP values achieved, the antihypertensive TFC therapy was more effective than FCT in LVMI reduction and LVH regression, possibly related to drugs' intrinsic properties and to BPV modulation.

Effects of the combinations of amlodipine/valsartan versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide on left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a marker of cardiac end-organ damage, is frequently found in patients with arterial hypertension and is associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, LVH regression is an important treatment goal. For amlodipine plus valsartan (A/V) no specific study on LVH has been reported to date.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, randomized parallel-group study. Patients with essential hypertension and LVH were randomized to 52-week treatment with A/V 10/160 mg (n = 43) or the active comparator losartan/HCT 100/25 mg (L/H, n = 47). Add-on medication was allowed in case of inadequate blood pressure control. LV parameters were measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adjudicated in a blinded manner. Study identifiers were NCT00446563 and EudraCT 2006-001977-17.

RESULTS

In addition to the study treatment, 35% of patients in the A/V group and 49% in the L/H group received additional antihypertensive medication. Compared to baseline, both treatments reduced measures of LVH significantly after 52 weeks (e.g. LV mass index in the A/V group from 64.7 g/m(2) by -3.5 g/m(2), in the L/H group from 69.1 g/m(2) by -4.4 g/m(2), p < 0.01 for both). LV ejection fraction and LV volumes were not significantly changed by any regimen. A/V and L/H treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Both regimen were effective in reducing LV mass compared to baseline and were well tolerated.

Fibroblast apoptosis precedes cardiomyocyte mass reduction during left ventricular remodeling in hypertensive rats treated with amlodipine

BACKGROUND

A transient induction of apoptosis accompanies the normalization of left ventricular mass index in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) treated with dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers. However, the cell type undergoing apoptosis in this model and the temporal correlation with onset cardiac remodeling remain undefined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SHR were treated either with vehicle or amlodipine (20 mg/kg per day) for 4, 7, 10, 14 or 28 days. Amlodipine stably reduced systolic blood pressure by day 2 (-26 +/- 2%) and stably reduced the left ventricular concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) mRNA by approximately 50% as early as day 4, suggesting the early reduction of cardiomyocyte stress. Left ventricular mass index was significantly reduced by day 7 (-4.6 +/- 1.5%), in coordination with reduced DNA content (-23 +/- 2%) and non-cardiomyocyte number (-17 +/- 4%). However, the cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area was reduced only starting from day 14. Caspase-3 cleavage was significantly increased at day 7 only. Ultimately, amlodipine for 28 days induced a slight increase in capillary density without affecting total cardiomyocyte number, while reducing the total number of non-cardiomyocytes down to levels seen in untreated normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. Bax to Bcl-2 protein ratios were increased from day 7 to day 28. In situ double labeling by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method (apoptosis) combined with rhodamine-labeled lectin binding (endothelial cell marker) revealed a significant increase (> 3-fold) in TUNEL-positive, lectin-negative non-cardiomyocytes in the interstitium between days 7 and 14.

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular remodeling induced by amlodipine in SHR involves selective deletion of excess fibroblasts via apoptosis prior to cardiomyocyte mass reduction, but after attenuation of ANP gene expression.

Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in type 2 diabetes with hypertension by candesartan

This study was designed to compare the effect of candesartan on cardiac left ventricular mass in Japanese patients with that of amlodipine. A total of 40 type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were randomly assigned to receive candesartan (n=20) or amlodipine (n=20). The two treatments when administered for 6 months significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BPs) to a comparable extent. Notably, candesartan significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (LVMI: from 131.5+/-4.5 to 112.1+/-5.9g/m(2), P=0.0009, M+/-S.E.M.), LV posterior wall thickness (PWTd: from 10.3+/-0.3 to 9.1+/-0.3mm, P=0.0052) and interventricular septal thickness (IVSTd: from 10.7+/-0.4 to 9.3+/-0.4mm, P=0.0019) as determined by echocardiography in diastole, but amlodipine treatment did not. LVMI, PWTd and IVSTd were decreased more significantly by the treatment with candesartan than by that with amlodipine (P=0.020, 0.031 and 0.043). The present study thus revealed that candesartan effectively induced regression of LVH in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension due to effects beyond reduction in BP.

Preliminary Experience with Amlodipine in the Pediatric Population

The authors retrospectively examined their experience with amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in 32 pediatric-aged patients, ranging in age from 4 to 26 years, with blood pressure (BP) readings greater than the 90th percentile for age. Amlodipine was used as the sole therapy in 9 patients and with other antihypertensive therapy in 23 patients. Additional antihypertensive drugs used in combination with amlodipine included beta-adrenergic antagonists, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics. The starting dose of amlodipine was 0.13+/-0.09 mg/kg/d. The dose was increased in 20 of 32 patients to 0.23+/-0.13 mg/kg/d. Amlodipine was administered once daily to 26 patients and twice daily to 6 patients. After therapy with amlodipine was initiated, the systolic BP decreased from 141+/-15 to 132+/-9 mm Hg (P=0.01) and the diastolic BP decreased from 84+/-16 to 77+/-8 mmHg (P=0,03). There were a total of 2145 follow-up BP readings. The follow-up systolic BP was lower than the initial BP prior to starting amlodipine 59% of the time and the diastolic BP was lower than the initial BP 61% of the time. The follow-up systolic BP was lower than the 90th percentile predicted for age 33% of the time after starting amlodipine and the diastolic BF was lower than the 90th percentile for age 52% of the time. Adverse effects were noted in 4 of the 32 patients (12.5%). These included fatigue (n=2), dizziness (n=1), and ankle edema (n=1). Amlodipine therapy was discontinued in only 1 patient (the patient with ankle edema). Given its efficacy, the low incidence of adverse effects, and availability as a suspension, amlodipine is an effective agent for the treatment of hypertension in the pediatric-aged patient.

Early recognition and treatment of hypertensive heart disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension leads to left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and eventually clinical heart failure (hypertensive heart disease). There is an important need for physicians to recognize this entity, understand its pathophysiology, and become fluent in treatment options available. This review of recent basic science and clinical data serves to accomplish this task.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past year, a number of exciting concepts have come to the forefront. First, data on the use of brain natriuretic peptide as a screening biomarker has shown promise in patients with symptoms of heart failure. For the earliest detection of structural changes, serum propeptide of procollagen type I, a marker of the deposition of type I collagen in the cardiac interstitium provides a noninvasive way to quantify myocardial fibrosis. Treatment options in the past few years have focused heavily on the anti-fibrotic effects of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, perhaps supplanting beta blockers as first-line agents to regress left ventricular hypertrophy. The concept of aldosterone escape is discussed, highlighting the importance of aldosterone inhibitors in these patients. Lastly, we provide a comprehensive review of all antihypertensive classes and their effects on hypertensive heart disease.

SUMMARY

The incidence of hypertensive heart disease is increasing. Earlier detection may be possible with newly studied serum biomarkers. All anti-hypertensive treatments have shown improvement in regressing left ventricular hypertrophy, but inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system possess the most potent anti-fibrotic effects. It is increasingly important for clinicians to identify and manage hypertensive heart disease to prevent increased morbidity and mortality.

Comparative Effects of Irbesartan Versus Amlodipine on Left Ventricular Mass Index in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the effects of irbesartan and amlodipine monotherapies on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in patients with mild to moderate untreated hypertension and echocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Sixty hypertensive patients (35 men, 25 women; mean age, 52.8 years +/- 12.6) with diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 100 mm Hg were randomized to irbesartan 150 mg once daily or amlodipine 5 mg once daily for a 4-week titration period. Dosage of both drugs was increased to irbesartan 300 mg once daily or amlodipine 10 mg once daily in case of sitting diastolic BP still >90 mm Hg after the first 2 weeks of treatment. Dosage doubling was necessary in more than 50% of patients in both treatment groups. After the titration period, only the responders (sitting diastolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg) entered a 5-month maintenance period. After 3 months, echocardiographically estimated LVMI decreased by 23.2% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 11.4% in the amlodipine-treated patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.8% in favor of irbesartan (P < 0.0001). After 6 months, it decreased by 24.7% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 13.0% in the amlodipine-treated patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.6% in favor of irbesartan (P < 0.0001).

Long-acting Ca2+ blockers prevent myocardial remodeling induced by chronic NO inhibition in rats

Chronic inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis induces cardiac remodeling independent of systemic hemodynamic changes in rats. We examined whether long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers block myocardial remodeling and whether the activation of 70-kDa S6 kinase (p70S6K) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are involved. Ten groups of Wistar-Kyoto rats underwent 8 weeks of drug treatment consisting of a combination of NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inactive isomer (D-NAME), amlodipine (1 or 3 mg/kg per day), or benidipine (3 or 10 mg/kg per day). In other groups, L-NAME was also used in combination with a p70S6K inhibitor (rapamycin), a MEK inhibitor (PD98059), and hydralazine. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate, and left ventricular weight (LVW) were measured, together with histological examinations and kinase assay. L-NAME increased SBP and LVW (1048+/-22 versus 780+/-18 mg, P<0.01) compared with the control, showing a significant increase in cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes after 8 weeks. Amlodipine, benidipine, or hydralazine equally attenuated the increase in SBP induced by L-NAME. However, both amlodipine and benidipine but not hydralazine attenuated the increase in LVW by L-NAME (789+/-27, 825+/-20 mg, P<0.01, and 1118+/-29 mg, NS, respectively), also confirmed by histological analysis. L-NAME caused a 2.2-fold/1.8-fold increase in p70S6K/ERK activity in myocardium compared with the control, both of which were attenuated by both amlodipine and benidipine but not hydralazine. Both rapamycin and PD98059 attenuated cardiac hypertrophy in this model. Thus, long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers inhibited cardiac hypertrophy induced by chronic inhibition of NO synthesis by inhibiting both p70S6K and ERK in vivo.