Cytogenetics, conserved synteny and evolution of chicken fucosyltransferase genes compared to human

Site-specific fucosylation of sialylated polylactosamines by alpha1,3/4-fucosyltransferases-V and -VI Is defined by amino acids near the N terminus of the catalytic domain

Fucose transfer from GDP-fucose to GlcNAc residues of the sialylated polylactosamine acceptor NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4Glc-NAcbeta1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-3Galbeta1-4Glcbeta1-ceramide leads to two isomeric monofucosyl antigens, VIM2 and sialyl-Le(x). Human alpha1,3/4-fucosyltransferase (FucT)-V catalyzes primarily the synthesis of VIM2, whereas human FucT-VI catalyzes primarily the synthesis of sialyl-Le(x). Thus, these two enzymes have distinct "site-specific fucosylation" properties. Amino acid sequence alignment of these enzymes showed that there are 24 amino acid differences in their catalytic domains. Studies were conducted to determine which of the amino acid differences are responsible for the site-specific fucosylation properties of each enzyme. Domain swapping (replacing a portion of the catalytic domain from one enzyme with an analogous portion from the other enzyme) demonstrated that site-specific fucosylation was defined within a 40-amino acid segment containing 8 amino acid differences between the two enzymes. Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated that the site-specific fucosylation properties of these enzymes could be reversed by substituting 4 amino acids from one sequence with the other. These results were observed in both in vitro enzyme assays and flow cytometric analyses of Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with plasmids containing the various enzyme constructs. Modeling studies of human FucT using a structure of a bacterial fucosyltransferase as a template demonstrated that the amino acids responsible for site-specific fucosylation map near the GDP-fucose-binding site. Additional enzyme studies demonstrated that FucT-VI has approximately 12-fold higher activity compared with FucT-V and that the Trp(124)/Arg(110) site in these enzymes is responsible primarily for this activity difference.

En bloc duplications, mutation rates, and densities of amino acid changes clarify the evolution of vertebrate alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferases

Numerous vertebrates have four alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferase genes (FUT9, FUT7, FUT4, and FUT Lewis) belonging to the same family. Until now, studies on the evolution of this family have mainly focused on Lewis genes but how the other alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferases have emerged from a common ancestor is not well known. In order to define the respective roles of duplications and mutations, we have compared amino acid sequences representative of bony fish (Takifugu rubripes), amphibians (Xenopus laevis), birds (Gallus gallus), and mammals (Bos taurus). The FUT tree has two fundamental branches, each split into two subfamilies. We found evidence for two duplication events, dated around 710-760 Myr and 590-640 Myr, respectively, compatible with the hypothesis of two rounds of whole genome duplications in chordate genomes, before the emergence of bony vertebrates. Based on the Homo sapiens (human) physical map, we identified blocks of paralogues belonging to regions of FUT9 (6q16), FUT4 (11q21), FUT7 (9q34), and FUT Lewis (19p13) and to a region on HSA1p that is devoid of any FUT. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), an orthologue region of HSA1 harbors an FUT9 specific to bony fish, showing that duplications are not restricted to a single FUT gene but involve blocks of paralogues. In addition, sets of genes within each block clarify the order of duplication events and, as a result, the order of alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferase gene emergence. We have also determined the mutation rates and the density of amino acid changes along protein sequences in each alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferase subfamily during the main vertebrate transitions. After the emergence of tetrapods, the mutation rate of FUT9 decreased dramatically, suggesting the early acquisition of a crucial fucosyltransferase activity in the first stages of development. The FUT7 mutation rate, which in tetrapod ancestors is about half that in amniote ancestors, may be related to the role of this gene in immune systems. In contrast to other subfamilies, we found a constant mutation rate in FUT Lewis and a rather homogeneous amino acid density change, independently of the vertebrate transition, suggesting that hitherto Lewis epitopes have dispensable functions.

Cytogenetic repartition of chicken CR1 sequences evidenced by PRINS in Galliformes and some other birds

Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) belongs to the non-long repeat class of retrotransposons. Nearly 100000 repeats interspersed in the chicken genome are subdivided into at least six distinct subfamilies, each 300 bp long and all sharing substantial sequence similarity. CR1-like elements were found in genomes from invertebrates to mammals, suggesting their importance for genome structure and/or function. Moreover, numerous data support the hypothesis of their implication in regulation of gene expression. So, the chromosomal distribution of these CR1 sequences in vertebrates is of great interest to improve our knowledge about the genome structure, function and evolution. A comparison of the cytogenetic distribution of CR1 sequences was performed by PRINS using consensus chicken primers on the chromosomes of chicken and species of several bird orders: Galliformes, Anseriformes, Passeriformes and Falconiformes. The study revealed that CR1 repeats are spread over nearly all chicken chromosomes with a higher density on the macrochromosomes and in particular with hot spots on subtelomeric regions of chromosome 1, 2, 3q, 4q, 5q. Their distribution on the macrochromosomes forms a kind of banding pattern, which was not systematically matched with R- or G-banding. This banding pattern appears to be conserved on the chromosomes of the Galliformes studied, irrespective of their karyotypes, rearranged or not. CR1 primers also show similar signals on the chromosomes of birds phylogenetically more distant (Anseriformes, Passeriformes and Falconiformes). This fact confirms the importance of these sequences at the large scale of bird evolution and in the chromosomal structure. The location of CR1 sequences, and in particular of the hot spots, mainly within the richest CG areas are in conformity with the data on an epigenetic role of these highly conserved sequences.

Fucosyltransferase substrate specificity and the order of fucosylation in invertebrates

Core alpha1,6-fucosylation is a conserved feature of animal N-linked oligosaccharides being present in both invertebrates and vertebrates. To prove that the enzymatic basis for this modification is also evolutionarily conserved, cDNAs encoding the catalytic regions of the predicted Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster homologs of vertebrate alpha1,6-fucosyltransferases (E.C. 2.4.1.68) were engineered for expression in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Recombinant forms of both enzymes were found to display core fucosyltransferase activity as shown by a variety of methods. Unsubstituted nonreducing terminal GlcNAc residues appeared to be an obligatory feature of the substrate for the recombinant Caenorhabditis and Drosophila alpha1,6-fucosyltransferases, as well as for native Caenorhabditis and Schistosoma mansoni core alpha1,6-fucosyltransferases. On the other hand, these alpha1,6-fucosyltransferases could not act on N-glycopeptides already carrying core alpha1,3-fucose residues, whereas recombinant Drosophila and native Schistosoma core alpha1,3-fucosyltransferases were able to use core alpha1,6-fucosylated glycans as substrates. Lewis-type fucosylation was observed with native Schistosoma extracts and could take place after core alpha1,3-fucosylation, whereas prior Lewis-type fucosylation precluded the action of the Schistosoma core alpha1,3-fucosyltransferase. Overall, we conclude that the strict order of fucosylation events, previously determined for fucosyltransferases in crude extracts from insect cell lines (core alpha1,6 before core alpha1,3), also applies for recombinant Drosophila core alpha1,3- and alpha1,6-fucosyltransferases as well as for core fucosyltransferases in schistosomal egg extracts.