Efficacy of pneumococcal immunization in patients with renal disease--what is the data?

Pneumococcal vaccination coverage at the initiation of chronic dialysis, and its association with mortality during the first year

OBJECTIVES

Pneumococcal immunization is recommended in dialysis patients. We aimed to estimate pneumococcal vaccination coverage among patients who initiate dialysis in France, and its association with mortality.

METHODS

Data were extracted from two prospective national databases, merged using a deterministic linkage method: renal epidemiology and information network (REIN) registry, which includes all patients on dialysis and kidney transplants recipients in France, and the national health insurance information system (SNIIRAM) which collects individual data on health expenditure reimbursement, including vaccines. We enrolled all patients who initiated chronic dialysis in 2015. Data on health status at dialysis initiation, dialysis modalities, and pneumococcal vaccine prescribed from 2 years before to 1 year after dialysis start were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess one-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 8,294 incident patients included, 1,849 (22.3 %) received at least one pneumococcal vaccine before (n = 542, 6.5 %), or after (n = 1,307, 15.8 %) dialysis start, as follows: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV13) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), n = 938 (50.7 %); only PPSV23, n = 650 (35.1 %); or only PCV13, n = 261 (14.1 %). Vaccinated patients were younger (mean, 66.5 ± 14.8 years vs. 69.0 ± 14.9 years, P ≤ 0.001), more likely to suffer from glomerulonephritis (17.0 % vs. 11.0 %, P ≤ 0.001), and less likely to start dialysis in emergency (27.2 % vs. 31.1 %, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who received PCV13 and PPSV23, or only PCV13 were less likely to die (respectively, HR = 0.37; 95 %CI 0.28-0.51, and HR = 0.35; 95 %CI 0.19-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumococcal immunization with PCV13 followed by PPSV23, or with PCV13 alone, but not with PPSV23 alone, is independently associated with decreased one year-mortality in patients who start dialysis.

Duration of protection from pneumonia after pneumococcal vaccination in haemodialysis patients - Protocol of the DOPPIO Study (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a leading cause of death in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease treated with dialysis. Current vaccination schedules recommend pneumococcal vaccination. However, this schedule disregards findings of rapid titer decline in adult hemodialysis patients after 12 months.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to compare pneumonia rates between recently vaccinated patients and patients vaccinated more than 2 years ago. As an exploratory objective, antipneumococcal antibody titers in hemodialysis patients will be determined as a function. Factors influencing antibody kinetics will be identified.

METHODS

Within this prospective multicenter study, we aim to compare 2 strata of vaccinated patients: those recently vaccinated and those vaccinated more than 2 years ago. A total of 792 patients will be enrolled. Twelve partner sites (within the German Centre for Infection Research [DZIF]) with allocated dialysis practices participate in this study. All dialysis patients who are vaccinated against pneumococcal infection in accordance with Robert Koch Institute guidelines prior to enrollment will be eligible. Data on baseline demographics, vaccination history, and underlying disease will be assessed. Pneumococcal antibody titers will be determined at baseline and every 3 months for 2 years. DZIF clinical trial units coordinate titer assessment schedules and actively follow-up on study patients for 2-5 years after enrollment, including validation of end points of hospitalization, pneumonia, and death.

RESULTS

The study has enrolled 792 patients and the last follow-up has been completed. Currently, the statistical and laboratory analyses are ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Results will increase physician adherence to current recommendations. Establishing a framework for the efficient evaluation of guideline recommendations through a combination of routine and study data will inform the evidence base for future guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03350425; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03350425.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/45712.

Durability of Antibody Response after Primary Pneumococcal Double-Dose Prime-Boost Vaccination in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients and Candidates: 18-Month Follow-Up in a Non-Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial

Background: Pneumococcal prime-boost vaccination is recommended for solid organ transplant recipients and candidates. The long-term durability of the antibody (AB) response is unknown. The same applies to a dose-dependent immune response. Methods: We studied the durability of the vaccine response after 18 months in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and patients on the kidney transplant waiting list (WLPs). Both groups received either a normal dose (ND) or a double dose (DD) of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. The average pneumococcal AB geometric mean concentration (GMC) was evaluated. A level ≥ 1 mg/L was considered protective against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Results: Sixty WLPs and 70 KTRs were included. The proportion of participants protected declined from 52% to 33% in WLPs and from 29% to 16% in KTRs, with the previously significant dose-effect in WLPs no longer present (40% DD vs. 27% ND; p = 0.273). Average pneumococcal AB GMCs remained significantly above baseline levels (all groups p ≤ 0.001). Drug-induced immunosuppression diminished the vaccine dose-effect. Conclusions: At follow-up, the pneumococcal prime-boost vaccination still provided significantly elevated average pneumococcal AB GMCs in both populations. Though the proportion of participants protected against IPD in WLP-DD and WLP-ND were statistically comparable, a DD may still be recommended for WLPs (EudraCT: 2016-004123-23).

Immunogenicity and safety of double dosage of pneumococcal vaccines in adult kidney transplant recipients and waiting list patients: A non-blinded, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pneumococcal prime-boost vaccination is recommended for solid organ transplant recipients, but is not thoroughly tested in this population. Furthermore, a pneumococcal vaccine dose effect has never been investigated, though observed in healthy adults. To assess whether a double dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) increases the immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and patients on the kidney transplant waiting list (WLPs), a phase 3, randomized, non-blinded trial was conducted.

METHODS

KTRs and WLPs were in parallel groups assigned either normal or double dosage of both vaccines 12 weeks apart. A 'protective response' was an average geometric mean concentration ≥ 1 mg/L based on 12 vaccine shared serotype-specific IgG antibodies. Furthermore, number of antibodies with ≥ 2-fold rises and individual serotype-specific antibody concentrations were evaluated. Follow-up was 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventy-four KTRs and 65 WLPs were enrolled. In WLPs, double dosage resulted in a significantly higher proportion of participants with a 'protective response' (66.7%), 5 weeks after PPV23, compared to normal dosage (35.5%), p = 0.015. KTRs exhibited no dose effect. After PPV23, all four groups had increased their number of serotypes with ≥ 2-fold rises (p ≤ 0.05 for both WLPs groups; p ≤ 0.01 for both KTRs groups). Vaccines were safe, well tolerated and still immunogenic at week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggests that double dosage of pneumococcal vaccines used according to the prime-boost strategy might be recommendable for WLPs. Furthermore, our data supports PPV23́s additive effect to PCV13 in KTRs and WLPs. (EudraCT: 2016-004123-23).

When kidneys and lungs suffer together

A significant interaction between kidneys and lungs has been shown in physiological and pathological conditions. The two organs can both be targets of the same systemic disease (eg., some vasculitides). Moreover, loss of normal function of either of them can induce direct and indirect dysregulation of the other one. Subjects suffering from COPD may have systemic inflammation, hypoxemia, endothelial dysfunction, increased sympathetic activation and increased aortic stiffness. As well as the exposure to nicotine, all the foresaid factors can induce a microvascular damage, albuminuria, and a worsening of renal function. Renal failure in COPD can be unrecognized since elderly and frail patients may have normal serum creatinine concentration. Lungs and kidneys participate in maintaining the acid-base balance. Compensatory role of the lungs rapidly expresses through an increase or reduction of ventilation. Renal compensation usually requires a few days as it is achieved through changes in bicarbonate reabsorption. Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal diseases increase the risk of pneumonia. Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumonia and seasonal influenza is recommended for these patients. Vaccines against the last very virulent H1N1 influenza A strain are also available and effective. Acute lung injury and acute kidney injury are frequent complications in critical illnesses, associated with high morbidity and mortality. The concomitant failure of kidneys and lungs implies a multidisciplinary approach, both in terms of diagnostic processes and therapeutic management.

Would hemodialysis patients benefit from a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine?

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection can have potentially catastrophic consequences for patients on hemodialysis. Consequently, an effective vaccine to prevent S aureus infection would have a significant influence on morbidity and mortality in this group. To date, however, efforts to develop a vaccine have been unsuccessful. Previous antibody-inducing vaccine candidates did not prevent or attenuate S aureus infection in clinical trials. Recent advances have helped to elucidate the role of specific T-cell subsets, notably T-helper cell 1 and T-helper cell 17, in the immune response to S aureus. These cells are essential for coordinating an effective phagocytic response via cytokine production, indirectly leading to destruction of the organism. It is now widely accepted that next-generation S aureus vaccines must also induce effective T-cell-mediated immunity. However, there remains a gap in our knowledge: how will an S aureus vaccine drive these responses in those patients most at risk? Given that patients on hemodialysis are an immunocompromised population, in particular with specific T-cell defects, including defects in T-helper cell subsets, this is likely to affect their ability to respond to an S aureus vaccine. We urgently need a better understanding of T-cell-mediated immunity in this cohort if an efficacious vaccine is ever to be realized for these patients.

Decreased percentage of memory B cells is independently associated with increased susceptibility to infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

PURPOSE

Infection is a common complication and cause of death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). B lymphocytes, which are an important component of the immune system, play a significant role in defending against pathogen invasion. However, in patients on MHD, the connection between infection and B cell subsets remains largely unknown. Our study aims to clarify the potential role of the distribution of B cell subsets in the infection process in patients on MHD.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, basic information was collected from 175 patients on MHD from July 2016 to July 2017 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The distributions of the B cell subsets in patients with and without infection were analyzed using flow cytometry to determine the role of B lymphocyte subsets in the infection process in patients on MHD.

RESULTS

Among the 175 patients, 45 suffered from infection. The respiratory tract was the most common infection site, accounting for 67.86% of all infections. After adjustment using multivariate logistic regression models, memory B cells [per 1% increase, odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.949 (0.915, 0.984), P < 0.01], switched memory B cells [per 1% increase, odds ratio (95% CI): 0.939 (0.898, 0.982), P < 0.01], naïve B cells [per 1% increase, odds ratio (95% CI): 1.042 (1.009, 1.075), P < 0.05] and IgG titers [per 1 g/L increase, odds ratio (95% CI): 0.779 (0.630, 0.963), P < 0.05] were independent risk factors for infection in dialysis patients.

CONCLUSION

A decrease in memory B cells is independently associated with an increased risk of infection in patients on dialysis.

Immunogenicity and safety of the 13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate vaccine in 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine-naive and pre-immunized patients under treatment with chronic haemodialysis: a longitudinal quasi-experimental phase IV study

OBJECTIVE

To benchmark the immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV-13) versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) in haemodialysis patients pre-vaccinated or not with PPV-23.

METHODS

The study is a longitudinal quasi-experimental phase IV study in chronic haemodialysis patients aged ≥50 years. Total (ELISA) and functional (opsonophagocytic assay) antibodies after pneumococcal vaccination were quantified at baseline, and after 28 and 365 days. Of 201 eligible patients, 155 were included. Patients were divided in four groups. PPV-23 naive patients were randomized to PPV-23 (40) or PCV-13 (40) vaccination. PPV-23-pre-vaccinated patients were categorized as being vaccinated more (40) or less (35) than 4 years before the study and all received PCV-13.

RESULTS

Patients among the four groups had a significant ELISA antibody response for most serotypes that remained significant up to day 365 versus baseline. In PPV-23-naive patients, ELISA antibody titres were significantly higher among PCV-13 versus PPV-23 recipients for six serotypes (1.85-2.34-fold) after 28 days, and remained significantly higher for one serotype (6A, 1.57-fold) after 365 days. Following PCV-13 vaccination, increase in ELISA antibody titres was significantly higher among PPV-23-naive versus PPV-23-pre-vaccinated patients for 12 serotypes after 28 days (1.68-7.74-fold) and remained significantly higher in ten serotypes (1.44-3.29-fold) after 365 days.

CONCLUSION

Immune response after PPV-23 and PCV-13 remains significant for at least 1 year in non-PPV-23-pre-vaccinated patients. Among vaccine-naive haemodialysis patients PCV-13 seems more immunogenic than PPV-23. Immune response to PCV-13 is weaker in PPV-23-pre-vaccinated compared with vaccine-naive patients.

The ABC of pneumococcal infections and vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

In the general population, pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPV) decrease the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) whereas the impact on the prevention of noninvasive pneumococcal disease is less clear. As compared with PPV, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) provoke a higher, longer-lasting immune response resulting in a 45% decreased incidence in vaccine-type pneumonia, and a 75% decrease in vaccine-type IPD.

Methods

Literature review on pneumococcal vaccination in end-stage renal disease.

Results

As compared with the general population, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) suffer increased mortality and morbidity from pneumococcal disease (PD), being up to 10-fold for those treated with dialysis. Numerous, usually small and methodological heterogeneous studies demonstrate that PPV provokes a serological response in dialysis patients, kidney transplant recipients, children with nephrotic syndrome and CKD patients receiving immunosuppressive medication. This response is of less intensity and duration than in healthy controls. Similar observations were made for the PCV. The protective value of these vaccine-elicited anti-pneumococcal antibodies in the CKD population remains to be substantiated. For patients treated with dialysis, epidemiological data demonstrate a correlation—which does not equal causality—between pneumococcal vaccination status and a slightly decreased total mortality. Clinical outcome data on the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in the prevention of morbidity and mortality in the CKD population are lacking.

Conclusions

Awaiting better evidence, pneumococcal vaccination should be advocated in all patients with CKD, as early in their disease course as possible. The ACIP schedule recommends a PCV-13 prime vaccination followed by a PPV-23 repeated vaccine at least 8 weeks later in pneumococcal non-vaccinated patients, and a PCV-13 vaccine at least 1 year after the latest PPV vaccine in previously vaccinated patients. In the UK, vaccination with PPV-23 only is recommended. There exist no good data supporting re-vaccination after 5 years in the dialysis population.

Immunization in end-stage renal disease: opportunity to improve outcomes

Infection is the second most common cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), following cardiovascular causes. Immunization is a fairly simple, but underutilized, strategy for prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney failure. It is imperative for nephrologists and primary care providers to have an understanding of immunization as an essential component of preventive healthcare measures in this high-risk population. Patients with ESRD represent a unique population due to their immunosuppressed state, dialysis-related exposures and suboptimal response to routine vaccines. While the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) provides guidelines for vaccination of patients with renal disease against Hepatitis B, influenza and pneumococcal disease, the data on immunization against other commonly preventable infectious diseases are lacking. This article reviews the recent evidence on immunization in the ESRD population and synthesizes the related implications for maximizing prevention of infectious diseases in this high-risk population.

The association of pneumococcal vaccination with hospitalization and mortality in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination (alone or with influenza vaccination) in improving hemodialysis patient outcomes. We aimed to describe vaccination rates between 2003-2005 and to study the effects on outcomes.

METHODS

For 118,533 prevalent patients who initiated hemodialysis ≥90 days before 1 November 2003, had Medicare Part A and Part B and were aged ≥18 years, and alive through 31 October 2005, Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess pneumococcal vaccination effects on subsequent hospitalization and mortality, adjusting for demographics and comorbidity.

RESULTS

The 21% of patients who received vaccinations were older; a higher proportion were white, with diabetes as cause of end-stage renal disease and more comorbidity. Pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a statistically significant decreased mortality hazard [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.98], cardiac death (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97) and hospitalization for bacteremia/viremia/septicemia (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-1.00). The mortality hazard was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78) for patients who received pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The small but significant association between pneumococcal vaccination and lower mortality risk was seen despite factors associated with poor outcomes in patients most likely to be vaccinated. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccines may have beneficial synergistic effects. Hemodialysis patients may benefit from revaccination more frequently than the recommended 5-year intervals.

[Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae in solid organ transplant recipients]

The risk of developing invasive pneumococcal disease in transplant patients is estimated at 28 to 36 per 1000 patients/year according to the type of organ transplanted. This rate is much higher than the estimated incidence in the general population. This study reviews the current experience regarding the different types of vaccinations against Streptococcus pneumoniae in transplant patients, the immunogenic response to pneumococcal vaccine in these patients, the clinical experience to date with the use of pneumococcal vaccines, and the utility of a sequential vaccination regime including the heptavalent vaccine and vaccine for the 23 serogroups. The immunogenicity produced by pneumococcal vaccines in transplant patients is lower and not as long-lasting as in immunocompetent individuals, and the revaccination regimen inducing the most favorable immunological response is unknown. Nonetheless, pneumococcal vaccination provides clear benefits to transplant recipients and should be given before transplantation whenever possible.

Epidemiology of acute infections among patients with chronic kidney disease

The objectives of this review were (1) to review recent literature on the rates, risk factors, and outcomes of infections in patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and did or did not require renal replacement therapy; (2) to review literature on the efficacy and use of selected vaccines for patients with CKD; and (3) to outline a research framework for examining key issues regarding infections in patients with CKD. Infection-related hospitalizations contribute substantially to excess morbidity and mortality in patients with ESRD, and infection is the second leading cause of death in this population. Patients who have CKD and do not require renal replacement therapy seem to be at higher risk for infection compared with patients without CKD; however, data about patients who have CKD and do not require dialysis therapy are very limited. Numerous factors potentially predispose patients with CKD to infection: advanced age, presence of coexisting illnesses, vaccine hyporesponsiveness, immunosuppressive therapy, uremia, dialysis access, and the dialysis procedure. Targeted vaccination seems to have variable efficacy in the setting of CKD and is generally underused in this population. In conclusion, infection is a primary issue when caring for patients who receive maintenance dialysis. Very limited data exist about the rates, risk factors, and outcomes of infection in patients who have CKD and do not require dialysis. Future research is needed to delineate accurately the epidemiology of infections in these populations and to develop effective preventive strategies across the spectrum of CKD severity.

Disturbances of acquired immunity in hemodialysis patients

Acquired immunity disturbances in hemodialysis (HD) patients are many and diverse. They are caused by uremia per se, the HD procedure, chronic renal failure complications, and therapeutic interventions for their treatment. Current data suggest that acquired immunity disturbances in HD patients concern mainly the T-lymphocyte and the antigen-presenting cell (APC). The T-lymphocyte-dependent immune response is deficient, predisposing to infections and inadequate response to vaccinations. In addition, APCs are preactivated, which seems to be responsible for the malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome, and also affects T-lymphocyte function. At the molecular level it is assumed that the interaction between the APC and the T-lymphocyte is impaired. This disturbance is likely to concern the signal that results from the interaction between the major histocompatibility complex:peptide complex on APC surfaces and T-cell receptors on T-lymphocyte surfaces, or the signal that results from the interaction among the co-receptors of these two cells. The aim of the present review was to collect and classify the available clinical and experimental data in this area. Although many pieces are still missing from the puzzle, a better understanding of the responsible molecular mechanisms, will potentially lead to increased survival and a better quality of life in HD patients.

The effect of sirolimus therapy on vaccine responses in transplant recipients

Different immunosuppressant regimens vary in their effects on antibody responses to vaccination. The combination of prednisolone and azathioprine has only a minor effect, whereas the addition of ciclosporin attenuates protective antibody responses to influenza vaccination. The effect of sirolimus, a new immunosuppressant, on vaccine responses has been little studied. Thirty-two hepatic or renal transplant patients randomized to calcineurin inhibitor-based or sirolimus-based immunosuppression were vaccinated against influenza and pneumococcus. Following tri-valent influenza vaccination, a similar rise in antibody titer occurred in sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treated patients, though sirolimus treated patients developed a 'protective' titer to more influenza antigens. The pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was equally effective in both groups. Hence, vaccination guidelines in place for CNI treated patients are likely to be appropriate for transplant recipients maintained on sirolimus.

Anti-pneumococcal antibody titre measurement: what useful information does it yield?

Measuring and interpretation of the immune response to pneumococcal polysaccharides is a complex field, owing to the diversity of the pneumococcal polysaccharide capsular types, different vaccine formulations including both polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines, diverse pneumococcal serological assays, lack of immunogenicity data for the conjugate in a number of at-risk groups and complex vaccine schedules. Even the reasons for performing pneumococcal serology can be complex, as assays may be performed for one of two reasons: either to assess an individual's immune status to the pneumococcus or to discriminate between normal and abnormal humoral immunity. This review details a history of the pneumococcal serological assays and provides some insight into when serology can prove useful, including vaccination data for certain at-risk groups.

Overview of vaccination in chronic kidney disease

Infections are a major cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, second only to cardiovascular disease, and also contribute to significant morbidity in patients with earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vaccines are a strategy to attempt to reduce morbidity related to infections. Patients with CKD and ESRD may not respond as well to vaccines as patients without kidney failure, but adequate seroresponse with standard or augmented regimens for vaccinations against influenza, hepatitis B, pneumococcus, and varicella have been documented. Influenza, in particular, seems to provide adequate protection with standard dosing regimens. Despite somewhat reduced effectiveness of certain vaccines in patients with CKD, there is emerging evidence of benefit to vaccination in these populations. However, vaccination rates are relatively low. Given the accumulating evidence of benefit, continuing quality improvement programs focused on increasing vaccination rates in patients with all levels of CKD are needed.

The Value of Serum Antilipoarabinomannan Antibody Detection in the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

The risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation in hemodialysis (HD) patients is increased, and screening for latent TB is recommended. The tuberculin skin test (TST) is inaccurate because of the high incidence of anergy in skin testing in HD patients and its inability to differentiate latent from eradicated TB infection. In this study, use of serum antilipoarabinomannan (anti-LAM) antibody detection for the diagnosis of latent TB in a dialysis population was evaluated.

METHODS

Seventy-four HD patients never treated for TB composed the first group. Forty-eight healthy volunteers never treated for TB served as controls. Twenty-one TST-positive renal transplant candidates on dialysis therapy who had completed preventive anti-TB treatment formed a third group. The TST (using the Mantoux method) and anti-LAM test (using an immunochromatographic assay) were performed in all subjects participating in the study.

RESULTS

In the first group, a strong association was detected between results of the TST and anti-LAM test (P < 0.0001, chi-square test). A similar association was found in the second group. In the group of HD patients treated for TB, a positive TST result and negative anti-LAM test result was a constant finding.

CONCLUSION

The association between the TST and anti-LAM test in HD patients suggests that the anti-LAM test could be a useful tool for diagnosing latent TB. The absence of anti-LAM antibodies in anti-TB-treated HD patients suggests that immune response to lipoarabinomannan lacks long-lasting memory. A negative anti-LAM test result might reflect the absence of latent TB, even in patients with a positive TST result.

[Infections after organ transplantation]

Early postoperative infections after transplantation vary according to the transplanted organ. During the subsequent course opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus reactivation, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, invasive pneumococcal infection and mould infections predominate. Reactivated tuberculous infection appears to become more prevalent. Some of the opportunistic infections are preventable by chemoprophylaxis; others can be managed very effectively by monitoring and early preemptive therapy. Physicians caring for patients after organ transplantation need to early consider in the differential diagnosis rare pathogens which are often overlooked with standard diagnostic procedures.