Comparative measurement of anti-factor VIII antibody by Bethesda assay and ELISA reveals restricted isotype profile and epitope specificity

High levels of anti-factor VIII immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin G total are associated with immune tolerance induction failure in people with congenital hemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors

Background

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice to eradicate neutralizing anti-factor (F)VIII alloantibodies (inhibitors) in people with inherited hemophilia A. However, it is not successful in 10% to 40% of the cases. The biological mechanisms and biomarkers associated with ITI outcome are largely unknown.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of plasma cytokines (interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17A), chemokines (IL-8/CXCL8, RANTES/CCL5, MIG/CXCL9, MCP-1/CCL2, and IP-10/CXCL10), and anti-FVIII immunoglobulin (Ig) G total, IgG1, and IgG4 with ITI outcome.

Methods

In this cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian Immune Tolerance Study, we assessed plasma levels of anti-FVIII IgGs using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with plasma-derived FVIII and recombinant FVIII as target antigens, immobilized in microplates.

Results

We assayed 98 plasma samples of moderately severe and severe (FVIII activity, <2%) people with hemophilia A after completion of a first ITI course. Levels of anti-recombinant FVIII IgG total and IgG4 were higher in people with hemophilia A who failed ITI (IgG total optical density [OD], 0.37; IQR, 0.15-0.73; IgG4 OD, 2.19; IQR, 0.80-2.52) than in those who had partial (IgG total OD, 0.03; IQR, 0.00-0.14; IgG4 OD, 0.39; IQR, 0.09-1.11; P < .0001 for both) or complete success (IgG total OD, 0.04; IQR, 0.00-0.07; IgG4 OD, 0.07; IQR, 0.06-0.40; P < .0001 for both). Plasma cytokines, chemokines, and anti-FVIII IgG1 were not associated with ITI outcome.

Conclusion

Our results show that high levels of plasma anti-FVIII IgG4 and IgG total are associated with ITI failure.

Predictive significance of anti-FVIII immunoglobulin patterns on bleeding phenotype and outcomes in acquired hemophilia A: Results from the Quebec Reference Center for Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) autoantibodies, involving various immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and IgG subclasses.

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the profile of Ig against FVIII in patients with AHA to identify Ig patterns predictive of bleeding phenotype and outcomes.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ig detection and titration were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at disease presentation in a cohort of 66 subjects from the Quebec Reference Centre for Inhibitors registry.

RESULTS

Most of plasma samples analyzed (97%) contained multiple anti-FVIII Ig isotypes and IgG subclasses, IgG(1,2,3,4) (24.2%), [IgG(1,2,3,4),IgA] (16.7%) and IgG(2.4) (13.6%) being the most prevalent combinations of Ig detected. AHA patients who presented with IgA antibodies were more likely to have an associated auto-immune disease (p = .049). The presence of IgG4-was associated with bleeding symptoms at presentation (p = .002). IgG1-positive patients were more likely to require transfusions with red packed cell (p = .014) whereas IgM detection was associated with a higher probability of death linked to AHA (p = .011).

CONCLUSION

The Ig pattern of AHA patients at diagnosis is widely heterogeneous and is at least partially associated with some underlying conditions. Our data supports the differential predictive significance for IgG1, IgG4 and IgM on bleeding severity and suggests that the early determination of Ig profile may help to identify AHA patients at higher risk of poorer outcomes.

Prevalence and Incidence of Non-neutralizing Antibodies in Congenital Hemophilia A- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: In hemophilia A the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies (NNAs) against Factor VIII (FVIII) may predict the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and accelerate the clearance of administrated FVIII concentrates. This systematic review aimed to assess: (1) the prevalence and incidence of NNAs in patients with congenital hemophilia without inhibitors and (2) the association between NNAs and patient and treatment characteristics.

Methods: We conducted a search in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal studies reporting on NNAs in patients with hemophilia A and B, who were inhibitor-negative at the start of the observation period. Data were extracted on: hemophilia type and severity, patient and treatment characteristics, NNA prevalence and incidence, NNA assays and inhibitor development. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using adapted criteria of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Studies were classified as high-quality when ≥5/9 criteria were met. NNA assays were classified as high-quality when both quality criteria were met: (1) use of positive controls and (2) competition with FVIII to establish FVIII-specificity. We reported NNA prevalence and incidence for each study. The pooled NNA prevalence was assessed for well-designed studies in previously treated patients, employing high-quality NNA assays.

Results: We included data from 2,723 inhibitor-negative patients with hemophilia A, derived from 28 studies. Most studies were cross-sectional (19/28) and none reported on NNAs in hemophilia B. Study design was of high quality in 16/28 studies and the NNA assay quality was high in 9/28 studies. Various NNA assays were used, predominantly ELISA (18/28) with different cut-off values. We found a large variety in NNA prevalence (Range, 0–100%). The pooled NNA prevalence in high-quality studies was 25% (95% CI, 16–38%). The incidence of new NNA development was reported in one study (0.01 NNA per person-exposure day).

Conclusion: This systematic review identified studies that were heterogeneous in study design, patient population and NNA assay type, with NNA prevalence ranging from 0 to 100% in inhibitor-negative patients with hemophilia A. The pooled NNA prevalence was 25% in high-quality studies including only previously treated patients and performing high-quality NNA assays.

Diagnostic accuracy study of a factor VIII ELISA for detection of factor VIII antibodies in congenital and acquired haemophilia A

Antibody formation to factor VIII (FVIII) remains the greatest clinical and diagnostic challenge to the haemophilia-treating physician. Current guidance for testing for inhibitory FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) recommends the functional Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA). A FVIII ELISA offers a complementary, immunological approach for FVIII antibody testing. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively evaluate the performance of a FVIII ELISA (index) for detection of FVIII antibodies, compared with the NBA (reference). All samples sent for routine FVIII antibody testing at two haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres, were tested in parallel using the NBA and a solid-phase, indirect FVIII ELISA kit (Immucor). A total of 497 samples from 239 patients (severe haemophilia A=140, non-severe haemophilia A=85, acquired haemophilia A=14) were available for analysis. Sixty-THree samples tested positive by the NBA (prevalence 12.7 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 9.9–15.9 %), with a median inhibitor titre of 1.2 BU/ml (range 0.7–978.0). The FVIII ELISA demonstrated a specificity of 94.0 % (95 %CI, 91.3–96.0), sensitivity of 77.8 % (95 %CI, 65.5–87.3), negative predictive value of 96.7 % (95 %CI, 94.5–98.2), positive predictive value 65.3 % (95 %CI, 53.5–76.0), negative likelihood ratio 0.2 (95 %CI, 0.1–0.4), positive likelihood ratio 13.0 (95 %CI, 8.7–19.3) and a diagnostic odds ratio of 54.9 (95 %CI, 27.0–112.0). Strong positive correlation (r=0.77, p< 0.001) was seen between the results of the NBA (log adjusted) and FVIII ELISA optical density. In conclusion, FVIII ELISA offers a simple, specific, surveillance method enabling batch testing of non-urgent samples for the presence of FVIII antibodies.

Comparative profiling of HLA-DR and HLA-DQ associated factor VIII peptides presented by monocyte-derived dendritic cells

The development of anti-factor VIII antibodies is a major complication of the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. Generation of high affinity anti-factor VIII antibodies is dependent on help provided by CD4⁺ T cells that recognize factor VIII-derived peptides presented on class II major histocompatibility complex on the surface of antigen-presenting cells. In order to identify the immune-dominant epitopes that can be presented to CD4⁺ T cells, we previously developed a mass spectrometry-based method to identify factor VIII-derived peptides that are presented on human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR. In the present work, we compared the repertoire of FVIII-derived peptide presented on HLA-DR and HLA-DQ. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells from nine HLA-typed healthy donors were pulsed with recombinant factor VIII. HLA-DR and HLA-DQ molecules were purified using monoclonal antibodies. Our data show that HLA-DQ and HLA-DR present a similar repertoire of factor VIII-derived peptides. However, the number of peptides associated with HLA-DQ was lower than that with HLA-DR. We also identified a peptide, within the acidic a3 domains of factor VIII, which is presented with higher frequency on HLA-DQ. Interestingly, this peptide was found to have a higher predicted affinity for HLA-DQ than for HLA-DR. Taken together, our data suggest that HLA-DQ participates in the presentation of factor VIII peptides, thereby contributing to the development of inhibitory antibodies in a proportion of patients with severe hemophilia A.

Characterization of the anti-factor VIII immunoglobulin profile in patients with hemophilia A by use of a fluorescence-based immunoassay

BACKGROUND

The development of neutralizing antibodies, referred to as inhibitors, against factor VIII is a major complication associated with FVIII infusion therapy for the treatment of hemophilia A (HA). Previous studies have shown that a subset of HA patients and a low percentage of healthy individuals harbor non-neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies that do not elicit the clinical manifestations associated with inhibitor development.

OBJECTIVE

To assess HA patients' anti-FVIII antibody profiles as potential predictors of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A fluorescence immunoassay (FLI) was used to detect anti-FVIII antibodies in 491 samples from 371 HA patients.

RESULTS

Assessments of antibody profiles showed that the presence of anti-FVIII IgG1 , IgG2 or IgG4 correlated qualitatively and quantitatively with the presence of an FVIII inhibitor as determined with the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA). Forty-eight patients with a negative inhibitor history contributed serial samples to the study, including seven patients who had negative NBA titers initially and later converted to being NBA-positive. The FLI detected anti-FVIII IgG1 in five of those seven patients prior to their conversion to NBA-positive. Five of 15 serial-sample patients who had a negative inhibitor history and had anti-FVIII IgG1 later developed an inhibitor, as compared with two of 33 patients with a negative inhibitor history without anti-FVIII IgG1 .

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide a rationale for future studies designed both to monitor the dynamics of anti-FVIII antibody profiles in HA patients as a potential predictor of future inhibitor development and to assess the value of the anti-FVIII FLI as a supplement to traditional inhibitor testing.

Phenotypes of allo- and autoimmune antibody responses to FVIII characterized by surface plasmon resonance

Evidence of antibody isotype/subtype switching may provide prognostic value regarding the state of immune responses to therapeutic proteins, e.g. anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies that develop in many hemophilia A patients, clinically termed “inhibitors”. A sensitive, high- information-content surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay has been developed to quantify IgG subtype distributions and the domain specificity of anti-drug antibodies. Plasma samples from 22 subjects with an allo- or auto-immune reaction to FVIII were analyzed. Pre-analytical treatment protocols were developed to minimize non-specific binding and specific matrix interference due to von Willebrand factor-FVIII interactions. The dynamic range for IgG quantification was 0.2–5 µg/ml (∼1–33 nM), allowing characterization of inhibitor-positive samples. Subtype-specific monoclonal antibodies were used to quantify the IgG subtype distribution of FVIII-specific antibodies. Most samples obtained from multiply-infused inhibitor subjects contained IgG4 antibodies. Several distinct phenotypes were assigned based on the IgG subtype distribution: IgG₁, IgG₄, IgG₁ & IgG₄, and IgG₁, IgG₂ & IgG₄. An IgG₁-only response was found in mild/moderate HA subjects during early FVIII infusions, and analysis of serial samples followed antibody class switching as several subjects’ immune responses developed. Competition studies utilizing a recombinant FVIII-C2 domain indicated 40–80% of FVIII-specific antibodies in most samples were directed against this domain.

Product-dependent anti-factor VIII antibodies

The development of anti-factor (F)VIII antibodies in haemophilia A (HA) subjects undergoing replacement therapy has been well documented. The correlation between antibody development and the FVIII product used for replacement therapy remains a subject of discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of anti-FVIII antibodies towards three commercial rFVIII products in 34 HA subjects' plasmas. Antibodies were quantitated by a Multiplex Fluorescence Immunoassay. All plasmas contained anti-FVIII antibodies at variable concentrations ranging from 50 nm to 570 μm. Eleven of the 20 HA subjects treated with one (r)FVIII product contained inhibitory anti-FVIII antibodies (0.8-3584 BU). The inhibitory antibody titre and the molar concentrations of total antibody were mildly correlated (r(2) = 0.6). Pronounced differences in antibody recognition with the three rFVIII products were observed. For the group treated with Product 'A', the titre towards this product was 2.4-fold higher than that observed with another full-length rFVIII-containing product (Product 'B') and almost four-fold higher than that measured with a B domain-less rFVIII product (Product 'C'). For the group of 14 HA subjects treated with FVIII other than Product 'A', only one showed higher antibody titre when measured with this product. Our data suggest that the development of anti-FVIII antibodies is biased towards the product used for treatment and that a significant fraction of antibodies bind to the B domain of FVIII.

Laboratory identification of factor inhibitors: an update

Coagulation factor inhibitors comprise antibodies that bind to and then neutralise specific pro-coagulant plasma proteins. Coagulation factor inhibitors can develop against any coagulation factor, although the most common are against factor VIII (FVIII). These can develop in individuals with inherited haemophilia A (HA) as an immune response to factor replacement therapy, or as auto-antibodies leading to the condition of acquired HA. Clinical suspicion for inhibitors may arise when individuals present with bleeding symptoms without any prior bleeding diathesis, or when a patient with known mild haemophilia presents with a bleeding diathesis more extreme to their usual presentation, or when there is failure of factor replacement therapy to arrest bleeding in a known haemophiliac. The laboratory identification of factor inhibitors requires a careful and systematic approach that excludes other possible causes of prolonged screening tests, most commonly the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and sometimes prothrombin time (PT). Coagulation factor inhibitor studies, including the Bethesda assay, are then undertaken to measure inhibitor titre, which guides treatment. This paper overviews the laboratory investigation of factor inhibitors, and also briefly reviews recent cross-laboratory inhibitor studies and the most recent evidence related to differential inhibitor formation according to type of therapy.

A flow cytometry evaluation of anti-FVIII antibodies: correlation with ELISA and Bethesda assay

In this study, we describe a flow cytometry (FC) system for detecting antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) and compare its results with those of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects both inhibitory (I-Ab) and non-inhibitory (NI-Ab) antibodies and the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda method, detecting I-Ab. FC was set up in our laboratory. Recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) was coupled to microspheres (FVIII-m) and reacted with different plasma dilutions. Microspheres without rFVIII were used as control (control-m). Captured anti-FVIII antibodies were detected using anti-human IgG. Plasma samples from the following patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA) patients were evaluated: 17 P (patients without I-Ab, <0.5 BU mL(-1)); 13 PI (patients with I-Ab, 1.1-8200 BU mL(-1)). Of these 13, two PI were referred during immune tolerance induction (ITI), and plasmas from 12 healthy donors (HD) were evaluated. Semiquantitative results were given as an index (the highest mean fluorescence intensity ratio between FVIII-m and control-m multiplied by the inverse of the corresponding plasma dilution). Both plasma and serum were suitable for the test. FC agreed with the Bethesda method (r = 0.8; P = 0.0001). FC and ELISA had 80% of coincidence. Four of 17 patients (23.5%) had NI-Ab by FC, and two of them developed high levels of I-Ab later on. This test provides a useful alternative for measuring FVIII antibodies supplementing Bethesda assay. FC is fast and easy to perform. No more than 200 μL of plasma or serum is required especially making it useful for paediatric patients.

Characteristics, mechanisms of action, and epitope mapping of anti-factor VIII antibodies

The development of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (Abs), also called inhibitors, is currently one of the most serious complications arising during the treatment of hemophilia A patients. Improved prevention and eradication of these Abs remain a challenge both for clinicians and scientists. Numerous studies in the literature have reported on their epitope specificity, on their mechanism of FVIII inactivation, as well as on the methods used for their detection. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the nature (isotypes, kinetic properties), epitope properties, and mechanisms of action of anti-FVIII Abs. Furthermore, we present methods for detection and epitope characterization of anti-FVIII Abs with emphasis on the Luminex technique susceptible to facilitate the monitoring of changes in the epitope specificity of these Abs.

Laboratory assessment of factor VIII inhibitor titer: the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association experience

Quantification of inhibitory antibodies against infused factor VIII (FVIII) has an important role in the management of patients with hemophilia A. This article summarizes results from the largest North American FVIII inhibitor proficiency testing challenge conducted to date. Test samples, 4 negative and 4 positive (1-3 Bethesda units [BU]/mL), were distributed by the ECAT Foundation in conjunction with the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association and analyzed by 38 to 42 laboratories in 2006 and 2007. Whereas laboratories were able to distinguish between the absence and presence of low-titer FVIII inhibitors, the intralaboratory coefficient of variation was high (30%-42%) for inhibitor-positive samples, and the definition of lower detection limits of the assay was variable (0-1 BU/mL). Most laboratories performed the Bethesda assay with commercially supplied buffered normal pooled plasma in a 1:1 mix with patient plasma. These data provide information for the development of consensus guidelines to improve FVIII inhibitor quantification.

Reactivity profile of anti-factor VIII antibodies with designed synthetic peptides mimicking epitopes of the C2 and a1 domains

Antibodies (Abs) that block factor VIII (FVIII) activity occur in hemophilia A patients treated with FVIII replacement therapy and severely impair treatment. In this work, we designed and synthesized ten peptides whose sequences are found in putative epitopes at the surface of a1 and C2 domains of the FVIII molecule. These peptides were screened for their ability to inhibit the binding of anti-FVIII Abs from plasmas of hemophilia A patients to FVIII. All peptides were efficient in inhibiting anti-FVIII Abs in plasma from patients with inhibitors, with however different efficiencies. It was found that each tested patient's plasma had a different profile of reactivity with peptides, consistent with an individual anti-FVIII Ab specificity. The profile of recognized peptides was also changing during the treatment of the patients. Three peptides were used in an affinity chromatography assay to attempt to remove anti-FVIII Abs from patients' plasma. Anti-FVIII IgGs were significantly captured by the peptide-Sepharose affinity matrixes as assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. However, due to the low level of Abs in the plasma samples, other methods (Chromogenic and Bethesda assays) were not sensitive enough to properly detect the reduction of inhibitors.

Assessment of in vitro cytokine response in hemophilia A patients with or without factor VIII inhibitory antibody

Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor antibodies are produced in a proportion of hemophilia A patients. Development of anti-FVIII inhibitor antibodies is a T cell-dependent response, mediated by FVIII specific CD4(+) T cells. This study was performed to investigate the contribution of T helper (Th) cell-mediated cytokine response in inhibitor production. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from hemophilia A patients with (n = 14) or without inhibitor (n = 14) and from normal individuals (n = 14). Following stimulation of PBMCs with rFVIII and phytohemagglutinin (PHA) mitogen, the secreted cytokines, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), in culture supernatant and the proliferative response were assessed using sandwich ELISA and (3)H-thymidine incorporation, respectively. No significant proliferative response to FVIII was observed, whereas PHA induced a strong response in all groups. No cytokine secretion was observed in response to FVIII stimulation. Although PHA induced IL-10, TGF-beta1 and IFN-gamma secretion in all groups, the level of IFN-gamma was significantly lower in hemophilia A patients than in normal individuals (p < 0.0001). The levels of TGF-beta1 and IL-10 were similarly higher in patients compared with normal subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant. Lack of FVIII-induced proliferative response and cytokine production together with reduced secretion of PHA-induced IFN-gamma in both groups of patients suggest involvement of nonspecific immunosuppression possibly due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection observed in the majority of patients.