Study of histomorphometric changes of the mandibular condyles in neonatal and juvenile rats after administration of cyclophosphamide

Risk Factors for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-Associated Bone Loss

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), including bone marrow transplantation, is the treatment of choice for many hematologic diseases, including hematologic malignancies and different types of anemia. The use of HSCT is increasing annually, mainly because advanced research that has been conducted in this area has exponentially expanded the indications for HSCT and significantly improved transplantation techniques and supportive care practices. Collectively, these improvements have led to an increase in the overall survival of HSCT patients. However, as post-HSCT survival is increasing, awareness of the potential late complications of HSCT is also growing. Unpredictable bone loss is one of the major post-HSCT complications that can cause significant morbidity and impair the quality of life of survivors. Although the exact mechanism of post-HSCT bone loss is not yet known, previous studies have suggested that numerous factors, including destructive preparative regimens (eg, high-dose chemotherapy, total body irradiation), treatment-related complications (eg, graft-versus-host disease), endocrine abnormalities (eg, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, adrenal insufficiency), lack of physical activity, and the underlying disease itself are responsible for HSCT-associated bone loss. Sufficient data have been collected to suggest that post-HSCT bone loss can be prevented and treated using the same preventive and treatment modalities as used for the general population. Various guidelines have been formulated to help keep a check on HSCT recipients' deteriorating bone health.

Changes in Bone Mineral Density in Women With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is an important long-term effect among breast cancer survivors. Little is known, however, about the pattern of bone loss and the factors associated with it.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine annual bone health changes and factors associated with bone loss for 3 years after diagnosis among women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Ninety-nine newly diagnosed women with breast cancer (mean age, 51.1 years) were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and yearly for 3 years.

RESULTS

During the 3-year follow-up, the proportion of women who had osteopenia or osteoporosis increased from 33.3% to 62.5%. The BMD of the participants significantly decreased 6.8% in the lumbar spine, 4.6% in the femur neck, and 3.5% in the total hip, with bone loss the greatest in the first year. In multiple linear regression analysis, chemotherapy was significantly associated with bone loss at all sites, and premenopausal status at diagnosis was significantly related to bone loss at the lumbar spine. We found no significant relationship between health behavior status and BMD change at any site.

CONCLUSION

Women newly diagnosed with breast cancer can lose up to 6.8% of BMD during a 3-year follow-up. Chemotherapy and premenopausal status are important risk factors for bone loss.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Identification of premenopausal women at diagnosis and monitoring BMD before and after chemotherapy are key for promoting bone health in women with breast cancer.

Eldecalcitol, an active vitamin D analog, effectively prevents cyclophosphamide-induced osteoporosis in rats

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) as an alkylating agent is used for treating a range of tumor types and allergic diseases. However, high-dose application may induce rapid bone loss and increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Eldecalcitol (ED-71), a clinically approved active vitamin D analog, has been approved for osteoporosis treatment. It potently inhibited bone resorption while maintaining osteoblastic function in estrogen-deficient and high-turnover osteoporosis in model rats. The aim of the present study was to clarify the treatment effect of ED-71 on bone loss in a well-established rat model of osteoporosis with CTX administration. After 15 days of CTX treatment, ED-71 was administered, while estradiol valerate (E2V) was used as a positive control. At 2 and 4 weeks after ED-71 or E2V administration, rats were sacrificed and fixed. The tibiae were extracted for histochemical analysis using hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. When compared with the untreated control group, the CTX group displayed clear osteoporotic features, including a decreased number of bone trabeculae and increased trabecular separation. ED-71 and E2V successfully rescued CTX-induced bone loss. The ED-71 group displayed denser and increasingly mature trabecular bone than the E2V group. Furthermore, ED-71 administration led to significant suppression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), cathepsin K (CK), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Osteopontin (OPN), which was less pronounced than in E2V administration but was similar to the values exhibited in the normal control group. These results indicated that ED-71 had a moderate and increased effect on bone turnover compared with E2V. Therefore, the present study suggests that ED-71 is a potential inhibitor of CTX-induced osteoporosis, successfully rescuing bone loss without excessively suppressing bone turnover, and may be a suitable treatment for preventing bone loss in patients receiving CTX.

Effect of anti-angiogenesis induced by chemotherapeutic monotherapy, chemotherapeutic/bisphosphonate combination therapy and anti-VEGFA mAb therapy on tooth extraction socket healing in mice

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), which is a rare but severe adverse effect, mainly occurs in oncology patients receiving chemotherapeutic agents and bisphosphonates. However, the combined impact of chemotherapy and bisphosphonates on wound healing after tooth extraction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the precise etiology of ONJ induced by chemotherapy and bisphosphonate combination therapy. Mice received zoledronate (ZA) monotherapy, cyclophosphamide (CY) monotherapy or CY/ZA combination therapy. The maxillary first molars were extracted 3 weeks after the initiation of drug treatment. Moreover, antivascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) monoclonal antibody (mAb) was administered once every 2 days just after tooth extraction for 2 weeks. Soft and hard tissue wound healing was evaluated 2 and 4 weeks post-extraction using histomorphometry, microcomputed tomography and immunohistochemistry. ZA monotherapy did not induce impaired oral wound healing and ONJ-like lesions 2 and 4 weeks post-extraction, respectively. Tooth extraction socket healing worsened with severe anti-angiogenesis by CY monotherapy and CY/ZA combination therapy 2 weeks post-extraction. However, CY monotherapy rarely induced ONJ-like lesions with severe angiogenesis suppression, whereas CY/ZA combination therapy frequently induced ONJ-like lesions with severe angiogenesis inhibition 4 weeks post-extraction. Interestingly, anti-VEGFA mAb therapy delayed osseous wound healing with normal soft tissue wound healing of tooth extraction sockets, although this therapy significantly suppressed blood vessel formation. Our findings suggest that anti-angiogenesis alone is not the main cause of ONJ-like lesions induced by CY/ZA combination therapy. The combination of suppressed osteoclasts and anti-angiogenesis, in addition to other risk factors such as chemotherapy, may contribute to the development of ONJ.

Prevalence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions is increased in a chemotherapeutic dose-dependent manner in mice

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) worsens oral health-related quality of life. Most BRONJ occurs in multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bisphosphonate/chemotherapeutic combination therapies. Cyclophosphamide (CY), an alkylating chemotherapeutic drug, is used to treat multiple myeloma, although its use has been recently reduced. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of CY dose on tooth extraction socket healing when CY is used with or without bisphosphonate in mice. Low-dose CY (50 mg/kg; CY-L), moderate-dose CY (100 mg/kg; CY-M), high-dose CY (150 mg/kg; CY-H), and bisphosphonate [Zometa (ZA): 0.05 mg/kg] were administered for 7 weeks. Each dose of CY and ZA in combination was also administered for 7 weeks. Both maxillary first molars were extracted at 3 weeks after the initiation of drug administration. Euthanasia was performed at 4 weeks post-extraction. Gross wound healing, microcomputed tomography analysis, histomorphometry, and immunohistochemistry were used to quantitatively evaluate osseous and soft tissue wound healing of tooth extraction sockets. ZA monotherapy induced no BRONJ-like lesions in mice. CY monotherapy rarely induced open wounds, though delayed osseous wound healing occurred in a CY dose-dependent manner. In contrast, CY/ZA combination therapy prevalently induced BRONJ-like lesions with compromised osseous and soft tissue healing in a CY dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, anti-angiogenesis was noted regardless of CY dose and ZA administration, even though only CY-M/ZA and CY-H/ZA combination therapies induced BRONJ-like lesions. Our findings suggest that high-dose CY may be associated with the development of BRONJ following tooth extraction only when CY is used together with ZA. In addition to anti-angiogenesis, other factors may contribute to the pathoetiology of BRONJ.

Cyclophosphamide causes osteoporosis in C57BL/6 male mice: suppressive effects of cyclophosphamide on osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis

The clinical evidence indicated that cyclophosphamide (CPD), one of the chemotherapy drugs, caused severe deteriorations in bones of cancer patients. However, the exact mechanisms by which CPD exerts effects on bone remodeling is not yet fully elucidated. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the role and potential mechanism of CPD in osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Here it was found that CPD treatment (100mg/kg/day) for 7 days led to osteoporosis phenotype in male mice. CPD inhibited osteoblastogenesis as shown by decreasing the number and differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and reducing the formation and activity of osteoblasts. Moreover, CPD suppressed the osteoclastogenesis mediated by receptor activator for nuclear factor-κ B ligand (RANKL) as shown by reducing the maturation and activity of osteoclasts. At the molecular level, CPD exerted inhibitory effect on the expression of components (Cyclin D1, β-catenin, Wnt 1, Wnt10b) of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in MSCs and osteoblasts-specific factors (alkaline phosphatase, Runx2, and osteocalcin). CPD also down-regulated the expression of the components (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6, nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasm 1, c-Fos and NF-κB) of RANKL signaling pathway and the factors (matrix metalloproteinase 9, cathepsin K, tartrate-resistant acid phosphates and carbonic anhydrase II) for osteoclastic activity. Taken together, this study demonstrated that the short-term treatment of CPD induced osteoporosis in mice and the underlying mechanism might be attributed to its marked suppression on osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, especially the effect of CPD on bone formation might play a dominant role in its detrimental effects on bone remodeling.

Do long term survivors of ewing family of tumors experience low bone mineral density and increased fracture risk?

BACKGROUND

Multimodal treatment regimens for Ewing's sarcoma have led to survival rates approaching 70% of patients with no metastases at diagnosis. However, these treatments have long-term side effects. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and risk of fractures can occur owing in part to chemotherapy and limited mobility from local control of the primary tumor.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed this study to answer the following questions: (1) Do long-term survivors of the Ewing family of tumors sustain low BMD? (2) Which factors are associated with BMD in these patients? (3) Do they experience fractures? (4) Are BMD and fractures associated with each other?

METHODS

We queried our institutional registry to identify all known survivors of Ewing tumors who were treated before 2005. Of 100 such patients, 67 (67%) responded to a postal survey to participate in this study, and an additional 11 (11%) patients were excluded according to prespecified criteria. In the remaining 56 long-term survivors (27 females, 29 males; mean±SD age at followup, 32±10 years; mean followup, 15±7 years), BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and history of fractures was assessed using a questionnaire. Associations were tested using univariate and multivariate models by stepwise variable selection procedure, including Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 56 (56%) patients had a pathologic BMD. Seven (13%) had osteoporosis and 24 (43%) had osteopenia. Factors related to low BMD after Bonferroni correction were the length of time between surgery and followup and the BMI at followup. Twenty-one patients reported 29 fractures. With the numbers available, BMD levels were not associated with fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not confirm some potentially important predictors for fractures to be associated with clinical events of interest. However, the data are valuable as hypothesis-generating pilot data for future, multicenter prospective studies. If BMD changes cannot explain the propensity of fractures, there may be other bone characteristics like microarchitectural changes of bone to more accurately explain the effect.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Skeletal manifestations of treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer and osteoporosis are common diagnoses in women. Breast cancer survival has improved due to earlier detection and improved treatments. As most breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive, treatment is often aimed at altering the hormonal environment. Both pre and postmenopausal women undergoing these therapies are at risk for bone loss. The patient's health care team ought to have an awareness of the potential for breast cancer treatments to accelerate bone loss. Women with early stage breast cancer are treated with curative intent and, therefore, maintaining bone health is important and is part of the survivorship care to ensure an optimal quality of life.

Impact of denosumab on bone mass in cancer patients

Cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is a form of secondary osteoporosis associated with systemic chemotherapy and hormonal ablation therapy. The monitoring and treatment of CTIBL is an important component of comprehensive cancer care, especially for patients with curable disease and long life expectancies. Whereas oral bisphosphonates remain the most commonly used therapeutic option for CTIBL, additional treatment options may be required for patients who do not respond adequately or are intolerant to bisphosphonates, have renal insufficiency, or are receiving treatment with nephrotoxic medications. For these patients, denosumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative. Several recent randomized trials have examined the use of denosumab as treatment for CTIBL associated with hormone ablation therapy for breast and prostate cancer. Recent data suggest a possible role for RANKL inhibitors in both chemoprevention and the prevention of cancer recurrence through direct effects on breast tissue and breast cancer stem cells. The outcomes of several international Phase III clinical trials currently underway will help clarify the role of denosumab in patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Ovarian Damage During chemotherapy in Autoimmune Diseases: Broad Health Implications beyond Fertility

Women with autoimmune diseases such as lupus, scleroderma, and vasculitis receiving cyclophosphamide for severe disease manifestations risk primary ovarian insufficiency(POI) due to gonadotoxicity of this therapy. In addition to loss of reproductive potential, POI is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Practitioners caring for women requiring gonadotoxic therapies should be familiar with long-term health implications of POI and strategies for ovarian preservation. Accumulating evidence supports the effectiveness of adjunctive gonadotropin releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) for ovarian protection during gonadotoxic therapy in cancer and autoimmune populations. GnRH-a is less costly and invasive than assisted reproductive technologies used for achievement of future pregnancies, but is not Food and Drug Administration approved for ovarian preservation. This review focuses on POI comorbidities and strategies for mitigation of related sequelae, which can accumulate over decades of hypoesteogenism. These issues are arguably more pronounced for women with chronic autoimmune diseases, in whom superimposed POI further heightens risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. Therefore, even if future pregnancy is not desired, ovarian protection during gonadotoxic therapy should be a major goal of disease management.

Prevention of chemotherapy-induced osteoporosis by cyclophosphamide with a long-acting form of parathyroid hormone

BACKGROUND

Most chemotherapeutics reduce bone mineral density (BMD) and increase risk for fractures by causing gonadal suppression, which in turn increases bone removal. Cyclophosphamide (CYP) also has a direct effect of inhibiting bone formation and removal, making the resulting bone loss particularly difficult to treat with antiresorptive therapy.

AIM

We tested whether a single dose of the anabolic agent PTH linked to a collagen binding domain (PTHCBD) could prevent the effects of CYP-induced bone loss.

METHODS

Mice received either buffer alone, CYP, or CYP+ PTH-CBD. BMD and alkaline phosphatase were measured every 2 weeks for a total of 8 weeks.

RESULTS

After 6 weeks, mice treated with CYP showed expected reductions in BMD (increase from baseline: 7.4 ± 6.9 vs 24.35 ± 4.86% in mice without chemotherapy, p<0.05) and decrease in alkaline phosphatase levels (42.78 ± 6.06 vs 60.62 ± 6.23 IU/l in mice without chemotherapy, p<0.05), consistent with osteoporosis from impaired bone formation. Administration of a single dose of PTH-CBD (320 μg/kg ip) prior to CYP treatment improved BMD (change from baseline: 23.4 ± 5.4 vs 7.4 ± 6.9%, CYP treatment alone, p<0.05) and increased alkaline phosphatase levels (50.14 ± 4.86 vs 42.78 ± 6.06 IU/l in CYP treatment alone, p<0.05). BMD values and alkaline phosphatase levels were restored to those seen in mice not receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of PTHCBD prior to chemotherapy reversed CYP-induced suppression of bone formation and prevented CYP-induced bone loss in mice.

Aging and osteoporosis in breast and prostate cancer

As people with cancer survive longer, and as the US population ages, skeletal effects of cancer treatment are becoming more pronounced. This is particularly true for breast and prostate cancer survivors because of the high average age of patients with these malignancies, the propensity of older adults in general toward the development of osteoporosis, and the wide use of therapeutic agents in these cancers that negatively impact bone health. Various therapies used in the treatment and prevention of cancer may cause decreases in bone mineral density and an increased risk of debilitating fracture, even in the absence of bone metastases. Aging is both a baseline risk factor in the development of osteoporosis and bony fracture, as well as a predictor of poor outcome after fracture. A variety of mechanisms may be responsible for the development of bone loss in patients with breast or prostate cancer. Cytotoxic chemotherapy may directly exert long-term toxic effects on bone. Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy can induce hypogonadism, leading to an increased rate of bone loss. The risk of skeletal events in older adults due to cancer therapy should be appreciated by all oncologists, geriatricians, and internists. The following review may serve as a guide to the skeletal side effects of cancer therapy in older adults with breast or prostate cancer, how to screen for treatment-related bone loss, and how to best prevent and/or treat skeletal events.

Skeletal sequelae of cancer and cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Survivors of cancer may experience lingering adverse skeletal effects such as osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Skeletal disorders are often associated with advancing age, but these effects can be exacerbated by exposure to cancer and its treatment. This review will explore the cancer and cancer treatment-related causes of skeletal disorders.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search, using various Internet-based medical search engines such as PubMed, Medline Plus, Scopus, and Google Scholar, for published articles on the skeletal effects of cancer and cancer therapies.

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-two publications, including journal articles, books, and book chapters, met the inclusion criteria. They included case reports, literature reviews, systematic analyses, and cohort reports. Skeletal effects resulting from cancer and cancer therapies, including hypogonadism, androgen deprivation therapy, estrogen suppression, glucocorticoids/corticosteroids, methotrexate, megestrol acetate, platinum compounds, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, interferon-alpha, valproic acid, cyclosporine, vitamin A, NSAIDS, estramustine, ifosfamide, radiotherapy, and combined chemotherapeutic regimens, were identified and described. Skeletal effects of hyperparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, gastrectomy, hypophosphatemia, and hyperprolactinemia resulting from cancer therapies were also described.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

The publications researched during this review both highlight and emphasize the association between cancer therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and skeletal dysfunction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

These studies confirm that cancer survivors experience a more rapid acceleration of bone loss than their age-matched peers who were never diagnosed with cancer. Further studies are needed to better address the skeletal needs of cancer survivors.

[Osteoporosis in cancer survivors]

The detection of late sequelae in survivors of cancer has become increasingly important as developments in diagnostic and therapeutic methods have led to a more and long-term survival rates in tumoral patients. Osteoporosis is one of such problem that has been increasingly identified in patients with cancer. Significant bone loss and increased risk of fractures have been described in these patients. Medical problems associated with the malignancy or caused by the oncologic treatment are the main factors involved in bone loss. Therefore, patients at risk for bone loss should be undergo preventive or therapeutic interventions at an early enough stage to prevent fractures.

Cancer-treatment-induced bone loss, part 1

PURPOSE

The pathophysiology, frequency, sequelae, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer-treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) are discussed.

SUMMARY

CTIBL is a long-term complication associated with cancer therapies that can directly or indirectly affect bone metabolism. Although CTIBL can occur in any patient receiving a cancer therapy known to cause bone loss, CTIBL is most common in patients with breast or prostate cancer who receive chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or surgical castration, as these can cause hypogonadism and induce bone loss. CTIBL causes bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures; therefore, prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of CTIBL are essential to decrease the risk of fracture. Bone loss occurs more rapidly and tends to be more severe in patients with CTIBL compared with those with normal age-related bone loss. Fractures of the hip, vertebra, and wrist are the fractures most commonly associated with bone loss. CTIBL is diagnosed by measuring bone mass using bone densitometry. Treatment of CTIBL consists of changing diet and lifestyle such as optimizing calcium and vitamin D intake, exercising, modifying behaviors known to increase the risk of CTIBL and pharmacologic therapy with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen-receptor modifiers (SERMs), calcitonin, or a bisphosphonate.

CONCLUSION

Early identification and treatment of CTIBL are essential to prevent fractures. Patients should be instructed to optimize calcium and vitamin D intake, exercise regularly, and modify lifestyle behaviors known to cause bone loss. Patients with CTIBL should be treated with an oral or i.v. bisphosphonate; SERMs or HRT may be an option in some patients if contraindications do not exist.

Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Failure

Thanks to improvements in treatment regimens, more and more patients are now surviving cancer. However, cancer survivors are faced with the serious long-term effects of the different modalities of cancer treatments. One of these adverse effects is chemotherapy-induced irreversible damage to the ovarian tissues, which leads to premature ovarian failure and its resulting consequences such as hot flashes, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction and the risk of infertility. Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (or chemotherapy-induced premature menopause) affects the quality of life of female cancer survivors. Although there is no clear definition of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, irreversible amenorrhoea lasting for several months (>12 months) following chemotherapy and a follicle stimulating hormone level of > or = 30 MIU/mL in the presence of a negative pregnancy test seems to be an appropriate characterisation. Different chemotherapy agents, alkylating cytotoxics in particular, have the potential to cause progressive and irreversible damage to the ovaries. The result of this damage is a state of premature ovarian failure, with progressive declining of estrogen levels, decreasing bone mass and an increased risk of fractures. Historically, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) has been used to treat menopausal problems in the general population, but concerns about the potential of estrogen to increase the risk of breast cancer in women at high-risk or increase the risk of recurrence in cancer survivors, have forced physicians to utilise alternative treatments. This review discusses some of the newer therapies that are now available to provide appropriate symptom control, avoid complications such as fractures and possibly prevent infertility by making the ovarian epithelium less susceptible to cytotoxic agents.

Clinical management of osteoporosis in women with a history of breast carcinoma

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder that is characterized by low bone mass and compromised bone strength. Fractures are the clinically important consequence of osteoporosis and result not only in disability but also in excess mortality. Women who have a history of breast carcinoma may represent a unique population for whom screening and treatment for osteoporosis should be modified. A review of the English literature was performed that included original, review, consensus, and statement articles that were identified through Medline or National Institutes of Health-related links. According to the literature, osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem. Approximately 55% of the U.S. population > or = 50 years of age has low bone mass (osteopenia or osteoporosis). Annually, > 200,000 women in the U.S. are diagnosed with breast carcinoma. Due to the high prevalence rates of both low bone mass and breast carcinoma in women, these two diseases commonly coexist in the same individuals. Women with a history of breast carcinoma may be at increased risk of developing bone loss and fragility fractures as a consequence of antineoplastic therapies. The majority of women treated for early-stage breast carcinoma do not develop recurrences, as a result of recent advances in therapy. Ensuring the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of long-term toxicities and comorbid conditions like osteoporosis in breast carcinoma survivors is a serious concern and is of increasing importance. In this article, the authors address the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis in women who have a history of early-stage breast carcinoma.

The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on bone density in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer can have adverse effects on bone. We investigated the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

We performed a chart review of all our breast center patients who had spine or hip bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at our institution after treatment for stage I or II breast cancer. Patients who had other causes of metabolic bone disease were excluded. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. Results were expressed as age-adjusted standard deviation units (Z scores).

RESULTS

Of the 130 eligible women, 36 (28%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 94 (72%) did not. Mean adjusted bone density scores in both the hip (0.65 SD units; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.98 SD units; P = 0.0002) and spine (0.60 SD units; 95% CI: 0.01 to 1.19 SD units; P = 0.05) were significantly lower in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who had not.

CONCLUSION

Women who were postmenopausal when they developed breast cancer and who received adjuvant chemotherapy had lower bone density than those who did not. Whether this effect is caused by adjuvant chemotherapy remains to be determined.

Effects of cyclophosphamide on the femoral epiphyseal growth plate in young Sprague-Dawley rats

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of cyclophosphamide on cartilaginous growth and differentiation. Cyclophosphamide is a drug commonly used in the treatment of neoplastic diseases and in preparation for bone marrow transplantation. Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats divided into control and experimental groups received 2 i.p. injections of either saline or cyclophosphamide (30 mg/kg) with a 3-day interval starting from day 10 after birth. Effects on the proximal femoral epiphyses were evaluated histomorphometrically as well as semi-quantitatively at day 31 after birth. Results showed a significant reduction in length of the cyclophosphamide-treated femora compared to the controls. This could be attributed to a significant reduction in the thickness of the growth zone. Cell differentiation throughout the growth plates was clearly disturbed, involving nesting of cells, loss of polarity, and impaired maturation as seen by areas of excessive hyalinization. Although the effects of cyclophosphamide on the growth plates were significant compared to controls, the changes were not as extensive as previous reports have indicated. This could be attributed primarily to the fact that a comparatively low dose of the drug was used in the present study. Also, a period of recovery was allowed prior to evaluation. Nevertheless, significant effects remained which should be considered when treating young children with cyclophosphamide.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.