Value of the 14C-D-xylose breath test in patients with intestinal bacterial overgrowth

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist health-care professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: the challenges persist!

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was originally defined in the context of an overt malabsorption syndrome and diagnostic tests were developed and validated accordingly. More recently, the concept of intestinal contamination with excessive numbers of bacteria, especially those of colonic type, has been extended beyond the bounds of frank maldigestion and malabsorption to explain symptomatology in disorders as diverse as irritable bowel syndrome, celiac sprue and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Owing to a lack of consensus with regard to the optimal diagnostic criteria (the 'gold standard') for the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth, the status of these new concepts is unclear. This review sets out to critically appraise the various diagnostic approaches that have been taken and are currently employed to diagnose small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

BACKGROUND

A growing number of studies seem to suggest that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a common clinical problem. Although various techniques are available to make this diagnosis, tradition has accepted small bowel aspirate (>10(5) cfu/ml) as a gold standard. In this systematic review, the validity of culture and other diagnostic testing for SIBO is evaluated.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to present using electronic databases (PubMed and OVID). Full paper review of those abstracts that fulfilled preset criteria was carried out to evaluate the validity of various tests in diagnosing SIBO. Finally, all papers were evaluated against published standards for studies on diagnostic testing.

RESULTS

Seventy-one papers met the criteria for detailed review. Studies were very heterogeneous with regards to patient populations, test definitions, sample size, and methods in general. Small bowel colony counts appeared elevated in most gastrointestinal diseases compared to controls. The traditional definition of >10(5) cfu/ml was usually indicative of stagnant loop conditions. Although, numerous diagnostic tests were studied, not even culture papers met the quality standards described by Reid et al. Breath testing and other diagnostic testing suffered therefore from the lack of a gold standard against which to validate in addition to the poor quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no validated diagnostic test or gold standard for SIBO. In this context, the most practical method to evaluate SIBO in studies at this time would be a test, treat, and outcome technique.

Evaluation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth

Small bowel bacterial overgrowth historically has been associated with malabsorption syndrome attributed to deconjugation of bile acids in the upper small intestine. Recent reports raise the possibility that bacterial overgrowth may be a cause of watery diarrhea or irritable bowel syndrome. Quantitative culture of jejunal contents has been the gold standard for diagnosis, but a variety of indirect tests have been developed (and mostly discarded) over the years in an attempt to facilitate the diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. These include breath tests and biochemical tests based on bacterial metabolism of various substrates. Problems with these indirect tests include rapid transit, which may cause substrate to reach the luxuriant bacterial flora in the colon, producing false positives and vagaries of the tests themselves, which may produce falsely negative results. The perfect test for small bowel bacterial overgrowth is yet to be devised.

Using breath tests wisely in a gastroenterology practice: an evidence-based review of indications and pitfalls in interpretation

Breath tests are a simple and safe alternative to more invasive investigation strategies for many gastroenterological conditions. Both the hydrogen breath tests and the new 13C stable radioisotope breath tests are nonradioactive and safe in children and pregnancy. The range of diseases that can be identified include Helicobacter pylori infection, lactose and fructose intolerance, bacterial overgrowth, bile salt wastage, pancreatic insufficiency, liver dysfunction, and abnormal small bowel transit. In this review, the physiology supporting these tests and the principles of normal gas dynamics in the gut are briefly reviewed and then related to the test preparation and interpretation in two parts: 1) detection of H. pylori and 2) small bowel, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary disorders. A MEDLINE search reviewing all English language abstracts from 1966 to March, 2001 was performed, with an additional review of abstracts from major national meetings from 1997 to 2001. Using the information from this review, the performance characteristics of the various tests were detailed, and an attempt is made to provide some literature-based guidance regarding their indications and limitations. The interpretation of "flat" breath tests and the selective use of methane collection and colonic alkalinization are discussed. Breath tests are valuable tools that are, in general, underutilized in evaluating dyspepsia and functional bloating and diarrhea, as well as suspected malabsorption, including lactose intolerance.

Palliative care in inflammatory bowel disease: an evidence-based approach

The management of the patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging for both the physician and the patient. IBD imposes both a physical and emotional burden on patients' lives. Palliative care is important for IBD patients because it focuses on improving quality of life. While palliative care does not change the natural history of the disease, it provides relief from pain and other distressing symptoms. This article focuses on various aspects of care for IBD patients including pain control, management of oral and skin ulcerations, stomal problems in IBD patients, control of nausea and vomiting, management of chronic diarrhea and pruritus ani, evaluation of anemia, treatment of steroid-related bone disease, and treatment of psychological problems associated with IBD. Each of these areas is reviewed using an evidence-based approach. Evidence in category A refers to evidence from clinical trials that are randomized and well controlled. Category B Evidence refers to evidence from cohort or case-controlled studies. Category C is evidence from case reports or flawed clinical trials. Evidence from category D is limited to the clinical experience of the authors. Evidence labelled as category E refers to situations where there is insufficient evidence available to form an opinion. Algorithms for management of pain and nausea in IBD patients are presented.

The 13C-xylose breath test for the diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth in children

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical utility of the 13C-xylose breath test for the diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth in children.

METHODS

To determine the optimal dose of 13C-xylose, 29 healthy children, 3 to 12 years old, were randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of 13C-xylose (10, 25, or 50 mg). After an overnight fast, the oral dose of 13C-xylose was administered, and breath samples were collected every 30 minutes for 4 hours. Samples were analyzed for 13CO2 by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Using the 50 mg dose, we then performed nine breath tests with concurrent duodenal bacterial cultures in 6 children, 3 to 12 years old, with short-bowel syndrome (n = 2), immunodeficiency states (n = 1), and motility disorders (n = 3).

RESULTS

Excretion of 13CO2 in breath peaked at 2.5 hours in all three control groups. The 50-mg dose produced the highest median peak and the smallest range of 13CO2 excretion in breath within each time period. The time of peak 13CO2 excretion in breath varied among the diseased children; however, the six patients with small-bowel bacterial overgrowth (2 x 10(5)-3.5 x 10(5) gram negative rods) all had peak 13CO2 that exceeded the maximum breath 13CO2 level in breath of the control subjects at the corresponding time period (100% sensitivity). Of the three patients with negative cultures, two had negative breath test results and one had positive results (67% specificity). One subject had normalization of both duodenal culture and breath test results after antibiotic treatment of small-bowel bacterial overgrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results suggest that with a dose of 50 mg 13C-xylose, breath test results reliably predict small-bowel bacterial overgrowth in susceptible children.

Increased accuracy of the carbon-14 D-xylose breath test in detecting small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth by correction with the gastric emptying rate

To date, there is no general agreement as to which test is to be preferred for the diagnosis of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth. The 1-g carbon-14 D-xylose breath test has been proposed as a very sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth. However, in patients with severe gastrointestinal motor dysfunction, the lack of consistent delivery of 14C-D-xylose to the region of bacterial contamination may result in a "negative" result. The aim of this study was to determine whether the accuracy of 14C-D-xylose breath test for detecting bacterial overgrowth can be increased by correction with the gastric emptying rate of 14C-D-xylose. Ten culture-positive patients and ten culture-negative controls were included in the study. Small-intestinal aspirates for bacteriological culture were obtained endoscopically. A liquid-phase gastric emptying study was performed simultaneously to assess the amount of 14C-D-xylose that entered the small intestine. The results of the percentage of expired 14CO2 at 30 min were corrected with the amount of 14C-D-xylose that entered the small intestine. There were six patients in the culture-positive group with a 14CO2 concentration above the normal limit. Three out of four patients with initially negative results using the uncorrected method proved to be positive after correction. All these three patients had prolonged gastric emptying of 14C-D-xylose. When compared with cultures of small-intestine aspirates, the sensitivity and specificity of the uncorrected 14C-D-xylose breath test were 60% and 90%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of the corrected 14C-D-xylose breath test improved to 90% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, using the gastric emptying rate of 14C-D-xylose as a correcting factor, we found a higher sensitivity and specificity for the 14C-D-xylose breath test in the detection of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth than were achieved with the conventional method.

Bacterial overgrowth without clinical malabsorption in elderly hypochlorhydric subjects

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine commonly occurs in association with hypochlorhydria caused by atrophic gastritis or during treatment with omeprazole. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of bacterial overgrowth on small intestinal absorption and permeability and to evaluate the reliability of noninvasive breath tests to detect bacterial overgrowth in subjects with hypochlorhydria.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy, elderly subjects with atrophic gastritis or omeprazole treatment (40 mg/day) and documented bacterial overgrowth were studied.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of fat malabsorption (72-hour fecal fat) or clinically significant carbohydrate malabsorption (25 g D-xylose and fecal pH) in any subject. The ratio of lactulose to mannitol excreted was normal in both atrophic gastritis and omeprazole-treated groups. Three subjects in each group had abnormally high alpha 1-antitrypsin clearances. Lactulose (10 g) and glucose (80 g) hydrogen breath tests were only abnormal in 1 out of 17 subjects, whereas the 1 g [14C]D-xylose test was abnormal in 6 out of 17 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial overgrowth caused by atrophic gastritis or omeprazole treatment is typically not associated with clinically significant fat or carbohydrate malabsorption. Noninvasive breath tests for bacterial overgrowth are not reliable in subjects with hypochlorhydria.

Reduced accuracy of 14C-D-xylose breath test for detecting bacterial overgrowth in gastrointestinal motility disorders

The accuracy of the 14C-D-xylose breath test in the diagnosis of small-bowel bacterial overgrowth was prospectively evaluated in 10 patients with motility disorders: 6 myopathic, 3 neuropathic, and 1 mechanical obstruction. Six of the 10 patients had small-bowel bacterial overgrowth (> or = 10(5) colony-forming units/ml) on culture of small-bowel aspirate. Increased breath 14CO2 levels were documented in three of six patients with positive cultures and in two of four with negative cultures. Two patients with positive results by both methods and one of two patients with positive breath 14CO2 but negative cultures had previously undergone gastric surgery. Three patients with myopathic dysmotility had positive cultures but negative breath tests. Cultures of duodenal aspirates and the D-xylose test had sensitivities of 80% and 40%, respectively, for the finding of hypoalbuminemia. Compared with cultures, the sensitivity and specificity of the breath test were 60% and 40%, respectively. Impaired delivery of 14C-D-xylose for bacterial metabolism may result from postprandial antral hypomotility (n = 4) or low-amplitude (n = 6) small-bowel motility, contributing to the false-negative breath tests. Thus, culture is the optimal method to detect small-bowel bacterial overgrowth in patients with motility disorders.

Comparison of the proportion of unconjugated to total serum cholic acid and the [14C]-xylose breath test in patients with suspected small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

The proportion of unconjugated to total cholic acid in fasting serum and the 1-gram [14C]-xylose breath test were determined in 36 patients with suspected bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. Twenty-two patients had an abnormal [14C]-xylose breath test, indicating bacterial overgrowth. The proportion of unconjugated to total cholic acid was significantly higher in the patients with an abnormal breath test compared with those displaying a normal breath test (47 +/- 5% vs 16 +/- 3%). A good correlation was obtained between the proportion of unconjugated to total cholic acid and the breath test (r = 0.63, n = 36). Provided the [14C]-xylose breath test is reliable as a test of bacterial overgrowth, determination of the proportion of unconjugated to total cholic acid in fasting serum had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 94%. It is suggested that determination of the proportion of unconjugated to total cholic acid in peripheral venous blood may be useful as a simple screening test for detection of bacterial contamination of the upper small intestine provided the patients do not have bile acid malabsorption.

Bacterial contamination of the small bowel evaluated by breath tests, 75Se-labelled homocholic-tauro acid, and scanning electron microscopy

Eighty-one patients with diarrhoea due to suspected bacterial contamination of the small intestine were investigated with the bile acid breath test (BABT) and 75Se-labelled homocholic-tauro acid (SeHCAT). The impact of bile acid malabsorption due to dysfunction of the terminal ileum on BABT was evaluated. The group of patients with abnormal BABT, notably the 6-h accumulated value, showed a high frequency of reduced SeHCAT values (p less than 0.01), indicating that a reliable test for bile acid malabsorption is indispensable for interpreting the BABT in the investigation of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth. The results of the 14C-D-xylose breath test were compared with the outcome of the combined SeHCAT-BABT in 44 patients. In contrast to previous findings no correlation between the two breath tests was found. On the contrary, a significant negative correlation was encountered (p less than 0.01) for patients in whom either breath test was abnormal. Scanning electron microscopy for demonstration of adherent microorganisms was included in the investigations. No correlations were found with the outcomes of the different breath tests. The effect of antibiotic treatment was evaluated with regard to symptoms and breath tests. The results of the investigation indicate that different tests are needed for the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine, because of the different metabolic characteristics of the contaminating bacteria.

The diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. Reliability of jejunal culture and inadequacy of breath hydrogen testing

The reliability of a single jejunal culture in the diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth has recently been questioned. Seventy-seven patients thought to have bacterial overgrowth, defined as a jejunal culture yielding at least 10(6) organisms per milliliter of aspirate, took part in the study. Bacterial overgrowth was found in 74% of the patients with predisposing conditions and in 32% of those with no clear causes of bacterial colonization. The intestinal juice of some patients was taken at two different levels of the proximal jejunum, using both the closed- and open-tube systems. Highly significant correlations (rs = 0.90, p less than 0.001) were found between the numbers of bacteria per milliliter at the 2 jejunal levels and between the numbers of bacteria per milliliter of jejunal aspirate obtained from the closed and open tubes (rs = 0.84, p less than 0.001). Compared with the jejunal culture, the gas chromatography of volatile fatty acids in jejunal aspirate and the glucose- and lactulose-hydrogen breath tests showed sensitivities of 56%, 62%, and 68% and specificities of 100%, 83%, and 44%, respectively. This work demonstrates the reliability of jejunal cultures and the inadequacy of breath hydrogen testing in the prediction of positive jejunal cultures. When results of testing for volatile fatty acids in jejunal aspirates are positive, this always indicates the presence of bacterial overgrowth; thus, this procedure would avoid the more complicated, time-consuming, and costly bacteriological analysis of jejunal samples.

D-xylose testing: a review

The efficacy of D-xylose testing in clinical situations has been reviewed in the light of recent kinetic studies. The standard 25-g D-xylose test in adults, based on analysis of 5-h urine collection and a 1-h serum sample, discriminates between normal subjects and patients with proximal small intestinal malabsorption with greater than 95% specificity and sensitivity. The 1-h serum level measured after administering this dose is also useful in evaluating malabsorption in patients with intermediate degrees of renal insufficiency and in the elderly. The 1-h serum test after administration of 5 g of D-xylose should be used in pediatrics and is greater than 91% sensitive and close to 100% specific. The [14C]D-xylose breath test with 1 g of D-xylose has been useful in identifying malabsorption caused by bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.