Interaction of lymphocytes with Kupffer cells from halothane-exposed guinea pigs

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: current concepts

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients; they also markedly increase the uncertainty of drug development. The major targets are skin, liver, and bone marrow. Clinical characteristics suggest that IDRs are immune mediated, and there is substantive evidence that most, but not all, IDRs are caused by chemically reactive species. However, rigorous mechanistic studies are very difficult to perform, especially in the absence of valid animal models. Models to explain how drugs or reactive metabolites interact with the MHC/T-cell receptor complex include the hapten and P-I models, and most recently it was found that abacavir can interact reversibly with MHC to alter the endogenous peptides that are presented to T cells. The discovery of HLA molecules as important risk factors for some IDRs has also significantly contributed to our understanding of these adverse reactions, but it is not yet clear what fraction of IDRs have a strong HLA dependence. In addition, with the exception of abacavir, most patients who have the HLA that confers a higher IDR risk with a specific drug will not have an IDR when treated with that drug. Interindividual differences in T-cell receptors and other factors also presumably play a role in determining which patients will have an IDR. The immune response represents a delicate balance, and immune tolerance may be the dominant response to a drug that can cause IDRs.

Role of bioactivation in drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions are a major problem in both clinical treatment and drug development. This review covers recent developments in our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms involved, with special focus on the potential role of metabolism and bioactivation in generating a chemical signal for activation of the immune system. The possible role of haptenation and neoantigen formation is discussed, alongside recent findings that challenge this paradigm. Additionally, the essential role of costimulation is examined, as are the potential points whereby costimulation may be driven by reactive metabolites. The relevance of local generation of metabolites in determining the location and character of a reaction is also covered.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity

Drug-induced hypersensitivity is an adverse reaction, characterised by damaging immune-mediated responses, initiated by medicine given at therapeutic doses for prevention, diagnosis or treatment. Immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity accounts for 6-10% of the adverse drug reactions, which rank between the fourth and sixth leading causes of death in the US. With <10% of all adverse drug reactions reported, the magnitude of the problem is significant, with estimates of costs >$US30 billion annually in the US (1995 value). In addition, the costs of not determining the potential of a drug to produce hypersensitivity in the pre-clinical phase of drug development can be substantial. It has been estimated that the pre-clinical phase and clinical phase I, phase II and phase III costs are approximately $US6 million, $US12 million, $US12 million and $US100 million per drug, respectively (1999 values). It is important that investigational drugs with the potential to produce hypersensitivity reactions be identified as early in the development process as possible. Some adverse reactions to drugs can be avoided if drug-drug interactions are known or if there is a structure-activity relationship established. However, these methods are inadequate. Appropriate animal models of drug-induced hypersensitivity are needed, especially because hypersensitivity has been cited as the leading reason for taking drugs off the market. It is of critical importance to be able to predict hypersensitivity reactions to drugs. Most anaphylactic reactions occur in atopic individuals. Similarly, patients who have experienced other hypersensitivity reactions are more likely to have recurrent reactions. Therefore, animal models should be considered that predispose the animal to the reaction, such as the use of appropriate adjuvants and species. Using known positive controls of varying strengths, the investigator can rank the reaction against the positive controls as standards. This approach might yield greater results in a shorter period of time than using novel models. For the greatest safety, use of well understood models that have been thoroughly validated is imperative.

Serum gamma-interferon-inducing factor (IL-18) and IL-10 levels in patients with acute hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim was to determine the role of T-helper (Th)1/Th2 cytokine responses in the clinical outcome of patients with acute liver injury.

METHODS

The serum levels of the cytokines, interleukin (IL)-18, gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma), IL-10 and IL-4 were measured in 20 fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), 18 acute hepatitis (AH), 30 chronic viral hepatitis and 20 liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Thirteen cases were from the intensive care unit (ICU) and there were 21 healthy volunteers. Immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsies for IL-18 expression was also performed.

RESULTS

Serum IL-18 levels in patients with FHF were significantly more elevated than in patients with other liver diseases, ICU cases and healthy volunteers. Furthermore, serum IFN-gamma levels in patients with FHF were also significantly higher than in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, LC and healthy volunteers. We found a positive correlation between the levels of IL-18 and IFN-gamma. However, no relationship was observed between these and clinical outcome. In immunohistochemical staining, CD68+ macrophage cells and IL-18-positive cells were observed in portal zones. Elevated serum IL-10 levels were restricted to patients presenting with FHF, and were significantly higher in surviving cases (P < 0.01). Furthermore, serum IL-10 levels, but not IL-4 levels, were inversely correlated with serum total bilirubin concentrations (P = 0.045) and the death rate (p) outlined in Japan (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that IL-18 and IFN-gamma are involved in the pathogenesis of acute hepatic injury in humans, and that, in particular, elevated serum levels of IL-10 may be predictive of improved outcomes for these patients.

Immunological principles of adverse drug reactions: the initiation and propagation of immune responses elicited by drug treatment

Adverse drug reactions account for between 2 to 5% of all hospital admissions and can prevent the administration of an otherwise effective therapeutic agent. Hypersensitivity or immune-mediated reactions, although less common, tend to be proportionately more serious. There is convincing evidence to implicate the immune system in the pathogenesis of hypersensitivity reactions. Our understanding of the way in which the immune system recognises drugs is based on the hapten hypothesis; the onset of hypersensitivity involves drug bioactivation, covalent binding to proteins, followed by uptake, antigen processing and T cell proliferation. Central to this hypothesis is the critical role of drug metabolism, with the balance between metabolic bioactivation and detoxification being one important component of individual susceptibility. The purpose of this review is to classify drug hypersensitivity reactions in terms of their clinical presentation, and also to consider recent advances in our understanding of the chemical, biochemical and, in particular, cellular immunological mechanisms of hypersensitivity. The following topics are reviewed: (i) drug disposition and cellular metabolism; (ii) mechanisms of antigen processing and presentation; (iii) the role of cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules in the induction and maintenance of a polarised immune response; and (iv) the application of the hapten hypothesis, danger hypothesis and serial triggering model to drug hypersensitivity. A greater understanding of the mechanism(s) of hypersensitivity may identify novel therapeutic strategies and help to combat one of the more severe forms of adverse reactions to drugs.

Adhesion of lymphocytes to hepatic endothelium

Chronic inflammation occurs when factors that regulate the process of leucocyte recruitment are disrupted, and it is dependent on recruitment, activation, and retention of lymphocytes within tissue microenvironments. The molecular mechanisms that mediate lymphocyte adhesion to vascular endothelial cells have been described by several groups, but the signals involved in the recruitment of lymphocytes via the hepatic circulation have yet to be elucidated fully. This article considers the liver as a model of organ specific lymphocyte recruitment. In this context, the roles of leucocyte and endothelial adhesion molecules and chemokines in lymphocyte recruitment are discussed. The article also reviews the mechanisms that regulate lymphocyte recirculation to the liver under both physiological and pathological conditions and draws parallels with other organs such as the gut and skin.

Drug-induced immunotoxicity

Immune-related drug responses are one of the most common sources of idiosyncratic toxicity. A number of organs may be the target of such reactions; however, this review concentrates mostly on the liver. Drug-induced hepatitis is generally divided into two categories: acute hepatitis in which the drug or a metabolite destroys a vital target in the cell; immunoallergic hepatitis in which the drug triggers an adverse immune response directed against the liver. Their clinical features are: a) low frequency; b) dose independence; c) typical immune system manifestations such as fever, eosinophilia; d) delay between the initiation of treatment and onset of the disease; e) a shortened delay upon rechallenge; and f) occasional presence of autoantibodies in the serum of patients. Such signs have been found in cases of hepatitis triggered by drugs such as halothane, tienilic acid, dihydralazine and anticonvulsants. They will be taken as examples to demonstrate the recent progress made in determining the mechanisms responsible for the disease. The following mechanisms have been postulated: 1) the drug is first metabolized into a reactive metabolite which binds to the enzyme that generated it; 2) this produces a neoantigen which, once presented to the immune system, might trigger an immune response characterized by 3) the production of antibodies recognizing both the native and/or the modified protein; 4) rechallenge leads to increased neoantigen production, a situation in which the presence of antibodies may induce cytolysis. Toxicity is related to the nature and amount of neoantigen and also to other factors such as the individual immune system. An effort should be made to better understand the precise mechanisms underlying this kind of disease and thereby identify the drugs at risk; and also the neoantigen processes necessary for their introduction into the immune system. An animal model would be useful in this regard.