JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

Preoperative identification of hepatocellular carcinoma from focal liver lesions ≤ 20 mm in high-risk patients using clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify HCC in focal liver lesions (FLLs) ≤20 mm among patients at risk for HCC based on clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features.

METHODS

Between January 2022 and July 2023, 386 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years; 277 male) at risk for HCC with FLLs ≤20 mm and clinical and preoperative CEUS data from three centers were retrospectively enrolled. Three prediction models based on clinical data (Cli-M), CEUS features (CEUS-M), and combined clinical and CEUS features (Com-M) were constructed using the training cohort (187 patients). Their predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in the internal and external validation cohorts. All patients were reclassified using the American College of Radiology CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) and combined with the best-performing model (modified LI-RADS).

RESULTS

The AUCs of Com-M were 0.873-0.951 in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, which were higher than those of Cli-M (0.749-0.795, all P < 0.05) and CEUS-M (0.848-0.899, all P < 0.05). The sensitivity of LR-5 of modified LI-RADS was significantly improved from 83.1 % to 88.9 % (p＜0.001) in the training, internal and external validation cohort while there was no statistical different on its specificity (82.6 %-94.7 % vs 95.7 %-97.6 %., p = 0.162-0.650).

CONCLUSIONS

The model based on clinical and CEUS features can help identify HCC in FLLs ≤ 20 mm in high-risk patients.

Simultaneous versus sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation has better clinical outcomes than monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, prolonged time intervals can lead to recanalization and neoangiogenesis, which may interfere with the synergistic effects of combination therapy. This study aimed to investigate whether TACE simultaneously combined with microwave ablation (MWA) is more effective than sequential therapy in patients with HCC.

METHODS

A total of 129 HCC patients who underwent TACE combined with MWA were included in this study. Based on the time interval between the first combination therapy of TACE and MWA, patients were divided into the simultaneous and sequential groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias between the groups. Overall survival (OS), time-to-progression (TTP), tumor response, and liver function were compared.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the simultaneous group had a higher tumor load. Following PSM, 36 and 40 patients remained in the simultaneous and sequential groups, respectively. The median TTP and OS were 12.9 vs. 10.6 months (P = 0.262) and 44.0 vs. 26.5 months (P = 0.313) for the simultaneous and sequential groups, respectively. After 4-8 weeks, there were 16 complete responders and 17 partial responders in the simultaneous group and 15 and 22 patients in the sequential group, respectively (P = 0.504). The median complete response duration was 11.3 and 9.2 months for the simultaneous and sequential groups, respectively (P = 0.882). These results did not differ in BCLC stratified subgroups. Patients with small tumor sizes (≤ 5 cm), tumor nodules ≤ 3, well-defined boundaries, and early-stage tumors were more likely to achieve complete response (all P < 0.05). After 4-8 weeks, the liver function was significantly improved compared to that before or one day after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE simultaneously combined with MWA is safe and effective but not superior to sequential therapy.

A network meta-analysis of different interventional treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The optimal clinical management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is challenging for clinicians. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of different interventional strategies for uHCC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI databases. Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to evaluate the disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival rate and 2-year survival rate, as well as the incidence of serious adverse events associated with seven interventional strategies. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects. Treatment rankings utilized surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), whereas heterogeneity was examined via I-square and meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 40 randomized controlled studies were included. Compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone, all of the combination treatments, including TACE with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and radiotherapy (RT), significantly improved the DCR. TACE combined with RFA was observed to be superior to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.03-3.81) and TACE (OR: 3.85; 95% CI: 2.66-5.69), with the highest probability (SUCRA 0.836). TACE combined with HIFU ranks highest 1-year survival (SUCRA 0.919) and 2-year survival (SUCRA 0.925) rates, and also exhibited a better 1-year survival rate than HAIC (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.09-9.03). Compared with TACE alone, HAIC exhibited a greater DCR (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.15-3.40) and a potential advantage in 2-year survival (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.02-3.78). No significant differences in serious adverse events were observed across treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TACE alone, combined treatments for uHCC patients demonstrates better efficacy and survival. Moreover, compared with TACE and HAIC, TACE combined with RFA provides better efficacy, whereas TACE combined with HIFU offers the highest 1-year survival rate. HAIC alone outperforms TACE in DCR and 2-year survival rate.

The New Updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging System: Roles of Trans-arterial Chemoembolization and Homework to Interventional Radiologists

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, which has been identified as the most commonly used staging system in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, was initially published in 1999, and it was updated in 2022. This new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging shows more flexible strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma based on each stage. Although the roles of trans-arterial chemoembolization were limited in intermediate stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B) patients in the previous version, its roles have been expanded in the new version of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. In this manuscript, we introduce how trans-arterial chemoembolization is incorporated in a new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system and explore the new role of trans-arterial chemoembolization and what interventional radiologists seek for in a near future.

Current research status and future directions of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

The rapid evolution of systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most common types of liver cancer, has attracted significant attention especially to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a highly promising treatment approach. This method, which delivers chemotherapy directly into the liver's arterial supply, is designed to maximize the concentration of anti-cancer drugs at the tumor site while minimizing systemic side effects. Despite the potential and the encouraging results observed in various studies, HAIC has not yet achieved widespread acceptance and utilization. Sorafenib is a widely used systemic therapy that targets multiple pathways involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis, while transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a locoregional therapy that combines arterial embolization with chemotherapy. These treatments have been the mainstay of HCC management, yet they have limitations that HAIC may potentially overcome. This article specifically comments on the network meta-analysis that examined the current research status of HAIC, highlighting its effectiveness and safety profile in comparison to established standard treatments such as Sorafenib and TACE. Through an extensive review of existing studies, the authors conclude that patients receiving HAIC often experience better survival rates and longer periods without disease progression compared to those receiving Sorafenib or TACE.

Current impact in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The challenge remains

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a significant cause of mortality worldwide, particularly among patients with liver cirrhosis. In most cases, surveillance in cirrhotic patients is neglected, leading to a diagnosis when the neoplasm is at an advanced stage. Within this context, Zhou et al carried out a network meta-analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, concluding that it is a superior approach compared to sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Unfortunately, the meta-analysis in question lacks methodological rigor, preventing the authors from making more definitive assertions. Additionally, we understand that transarterial chemoembolization, when properly indicated, is a highly effective therapeutic option, and that sorafenib, given the results of new therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, is no longer the recommended drug for the treatment of these patients. Therefore, we believe the use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is increasingly limited and lacks strong scientific support.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with coexisting portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor patient outcomes. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC with PVTT remain a subject of debate. In the present study, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), with complication rates as a secondary outcome. A total of six studies comprising 750 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The neoadjuvant therapy group exhibited significantly superior OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; P<0.001] and RFS (HR, 0.31; P<0.001) compared with the primary hepatectomy control group. Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.34; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 0.24; P=0.004). While the neoadjuvant intervention subgroup exhibited an improved OS compared with controls (HR, 0.37; P=0.001), no significant difference in RFS was observed (HR, 0.11; P=0.095). Geographical analysis revealed that the Chinese subgroup demonstrated a significantly improved OS and RFS (HR, 0.41 for both; P<0.001), compared with the control group. However, the Japanese and Korean subgroups showed no improvement in OS (HR, 0.25; P=0.057) compared with the control group, and the results did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood transfusion, blood loss, operation time, bile leakage, ascites, peritoneal infection, postoperative bleeding, complications or mortality (all P>0.05). Overall, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT without increasing complication rates, supporting its efficacy and manageable safety profile.

Seizing tumor factors for mortality and survival outcomes following liver resection in Indonesia's hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Backgrounds/Aims

The 3-year mortality rate for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Indonesia was 94.4%. This underscores a significant health issue in Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia due to its large population. This study aimed to characterize the outcomes of liver resection for HCC at a National Referral Center in Indonesia.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2020, all patients with HCC undergoing liver resection were included as subjects. Variables collected included sex, age, hepatitis status, and tumor's characteristics. Mortality and survival were the primary outcomes of the study.

Results

Among seventy patients, the mortality rate was 71.4%, with a median overall survival of 19.0 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 6.831.2). Thirty-one patients (44.3%) had extra-large HCC tumors (> 10 cm). Those with extra-large tumors had a lower median survival of 8.0 months. Child-Pugh B and Edmonson-Steiner grade 4 were associated with an increased mortality risk, with unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.2 (95%CI: 1.14.3, p = 0.026) and 3.2 (95%CI: 1.37.7, p = 0.011), respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that Child-Pugh class B significantly increased the risk of mortality, with an adjusted HR of 2.3 (95%CI: 1.05.2, p = 0.046).

Conclusions

While surgical resection is feasible for tumors of any size, most clinical features are not statistically significantly associated with survival outcomes. The prevalence of extra-large tumors among Indonesian HCC patients highlights the importance of early diagnosis and intervention. Surgical intervention at an earlier stage and with better grade tumors could potentially enhance survival outcomes.

Multicenter, retrospective GUIDANCE001 study comparing transarterial chemoembolization with or without tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors as conversion therapy to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Survival benefit in intermediate or advanced, but not early, stages

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Various conversion therapy options have become available to patients with unresectable HCC, but which conversion therapy is optimal for which type of patient is controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of TACE alone or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Data were retrospectively compared for patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent conversion therapy consisting of TACE alone (n=459) or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n=343). Compared to the group that received TACE alone, the group that received triple conversion therapy showed significantly higher rates of overall survival (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.53). In addition, triple therapy was associated with significantly longer median progression-free survival (15.9 vs. 8.0 mo, p <0.001). These results were confirmed in matched subsets of patients from each group. However, subgroup analysis confirmed the results only for patients with HCC in intermediate or advanced stages, not in an early stage. Those who received triple conversion therapy had a significantly higher rate of hepatectomy after conversion therapy (36.4 vs. 23.5%, p <0.001). Among those who underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy, triple therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of complete tumor response (32.1 vs. 11.1%, p <0.001). However, it was also associated with a significantly higher frequency of serious adverse events (35.6 vs. 27.0%, p =0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining TACE with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors was associated with significantly better survival and conversion efficacy than TACE alone among patients with intermediate or advanced unresectable HCC.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment strategies: Are transarterial approaches leading the way?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with advanced stages posing significant treatment challenges. Although hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising modality for treating advanced HCC, particularly in Asian clinical practice, its adoption in Western medicine remains limited due to a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. This editorial reviews and comments on the meta-analysis conducted by Zhou et al, which evaluates the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination strategies for advanced HCC. The authors performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of various clinical trials and cohort studies comparing HAIC and its combinations to other first-line treatments, such as sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In this work, HAIC showed significantly better results regarding overall survival and progression-free survival compared to sorafenib or TACE alone and their combination. HAIC in combination with lenvatinib, ablation, programmed cell death 1 inhibitors, and radiotherapy further enhanced patient outcomes, indicating a synergistic effect. This editorial focuses on the critical role of multimodal treatment strategies in managing advanced HCC. It advocates for a paradigm shift towards integrated treatment approaches to enhance survival rates and improve the quality of life in patients with advanced HCC.

Assessing the Predictive Accuracy of the aMAP Risk Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Meta-analysis

Purpose

We aimed to perform a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the reliability and test accuracy of the aMAP risk score in the identification of HCC.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023, to identify studies measuring the aMAP score in patients for the purpose of predicting the occurrence or recurrence of HCC. The meta-analysis was performed using the meta package in R version 4.1.0. The diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-DiSc software.

Results

Thirty-five studies 102,959 participants were included in the review. The aMAP score was significantly higher in the HCC group than in the non-HCC group, with a mean difference of 6.15. When the aMAP score is at 50, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio with 95% CI was 0.961 (95% CI 0.936, 0.976), 0.344 (95% CI 0.227, 0.483), 0.114 (95% CI 0.087, 0.15), and 1.464 (95% CI 1.22, 1.756), respectively. At a cutoff value of 60, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio with 95% CI was 0.594 (95% CI 0.492, 0.689), 0.816 (95% CI 0.714, 0.888), 0.497 (95% CI 0.418, 0.591), and 3.235 (95% CI 2.284, 4.582), respectively.

Conclusion

The aMAP score is a reliable, accurate, and easy-to-use tool for predicting HCC patients of all stages, including early-stage HCC. Therefore, the aMAP score can be a valuable tool for surveillance of HCC patients and can help to improve early detection and reduce mortality.

Contrast-enhanced US of High-Risk Indeterminate Focal Liver Observations Categorized as LR-4 or LR-M at CT/MRI

Background Indeterminate focal liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may require invasive biopsy or follow-up, which could lead to delays in definitive categorization and to postponement of treatment. Purpose To examine clinical effect of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in participants with high-risk indeterminate liver observations categorized as Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category LR-4 (probably HCC) or LI-RADS category LR-M (probably or definitely malignant but not HCC specific) at CT or MRI. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of a prospective international multicenter validation study for CEUS LI-RADS (January 2018 to August 2021). CEUS was performed within 4 weeks of CT or MRI. Tissue histologic and CT or MRI follow-up data were used as reference standards. Clinical effect of CEUS for HCC was evaluated in observations 10 mm or larger categorized as CT/MRI LR-4 and LR-M. Results Included were 109 participants (mean age, 64.3 years ± 8.3 [SD]; 68.8% [75 of 109] male participants) with 113 observations (≥10 mm) categorized as CT/MRI LR-4 (53.1%; 60 of 113) or LR-M (46.9%; 53 of 113). CEUS resulted in management recommendation changes in 33.6% (95% CI: 25, 43; 38 of 113) of observations; among these, 95% (95% CI: 82, 99; 36 of 38) were correct. A total of 30.1% (34 of 113) of CT/MRI LR-4 and LR-M observations were categorized at CEUS as LI-RADS category LR-5 (definite HCC), making biopsy unnecessary; 94% (32 of 34) of these categorizations were correct. Of CT/MRI LR-4 observations, 7% (four of 60) were categorized as CEUS LR-M; subsequent biopsy confirmed non-HCC malignancy in all participants. Clinical impact of CEUS was more substantial for observations 20 mm or larger (n = 68); CEUS helped appropriately categorize both LR-5 and LR-M lesions as HCC and non-HCC malignancies, respectively, and resulted in management recommendation changes in 40% (27 of 68) of observations with 100% accuracy. Conclusion CEUS resolved some high-risk indeterminate liver observations (categorized as LR-4 and LR-M at CT or MRI), with particularly high clinical impact for observations measuring at least 20 mm. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03318380 © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Current efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Newer systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to growing interest in combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systemic treatments. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HAIC and combination therapies in treating advanced HCC, a network meta-analysis was conducted by Zhou et al. The study included data from 44 articles. HAIC was superior in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rates compared to transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib. Moreover, combinations of HAIC with other treatments and single agents (e.g., lenvatinib, ablation, anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy, radiotherapy) provided better OS and PFS outcomes than HAIC alone. In this editorial, we will discuss the study findings, the strengths and weaknesses of the metanalysis, and future advances in the field of HAIC for advanced HCC.

LI-RADS US Surveillance Version 2024 for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update to the American College of Radiology US LI-RADS

In 2017, the American College of Radiology introduced the US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) as a framework for US surveillance of patients at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. This has aided in the standardization of technique, clinical reporting, patient management, data collection, and research. Emerging evidence has helped inform changes to the algorithm, now released as LI-RADS US Surveillance version 2024. The updated algorithm, the rationale for changes, and its alignment with the 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidance are presented.

FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with the FOLFOX regimen has demonstrated efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combined targeted and immunotherapy has emerged as a first-line treatment for liver cancer. In this study, we investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC in combination with targeted immunotherapy in patients with untreated, unresectable HCC.

Materials and methods

Data were collected from patients with initially unresectable HCC treated at Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from June 2022 to June 2023. Tumor response and survival outcomes were assessed following the FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy, The safety was also evaluated through the incidence of related adverse events.

Results

A total of 51 eligible patients were recruited. The objective response rate (ORR) based on mRECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 60.8% and 45.1%, respectively. The surgical conversion rate was 25.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.2 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 88.2%. Adverse events were observed in 98% patients, with 23.5% experiencing grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Conclusion

The FOLFOX-HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy regimen is effective in patients with unresectable HCC, demonstrated by a high surgical conversion rate and manageable adverse effects. This regimen represents a potential novel first-line treatment option for HCC.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Strategies: Major Guidelines and Screening Advances

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with prognosis and treatment outcomes that are significantly influenced by the stage at diagnosis. Early detection through regular surveillance is crucial for improving patient outcomes, especially in high-risk groups such as those with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B. Geographic variations in HCC risk factors, including viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), have led to the development of different international surveillance guidelines. This review aims to compare and evaluate the surveillance strategies proposed by the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EASL-EORTC).

METHODS

The review examined and compared major international guidelines on HCC surveillance, focusing on patient selection, imaging modalities, and the integration of biomarkers. We also explored recent advancements in screening techniques, including artificial intelligence and emerging biomarkers, to identify future directions for improving surveillance strategies.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified key differences in the guidelines, particularly in imaging modality preferences and the use of biomarkers for early detection. While all guidelines place emphasis on high-risk populations, the inclusion criteria and surveillance intervals vary. Additionally, novel technologies such as artificial intelligence show potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of HCC detection.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the need to harmonize the international guidelines, particularly in regard to patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD who remain under-represented in current surveillance protocols. Future research should focus on integrating emerging technologies and biomarkers to improve early detection and overall patient outcomes.

Prediction of the early hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Non-hypervascular hypointense nodules (NHHNs) can transform into hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during the long-term follow-up. However, the risk factors for NHHN hypervascular transformation in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected populations are unknown. This study assessed the predictive value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for HCC development in patients with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with HBV infection who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2011 and July 2019 and were followed up for 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging features, including cirrhosis, steatosis, and NHHNs, were collected. Radiomics features were extracted from the entire liver. The HCC development predictive models were built based on each patient's clinical data, MRI features, and radiomic features. We then collected the qualitative and quantitative features of each NHHN and investigated the risk factors of hypervascular transformation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients developed HCC within two years. The risk factors for HCC development in patients with chronic HBV infection included older age, cirrhosis, and NHHNs. The MRI, radiomics, and integrated models developed all had an area under the curve (AUC) above 0.8. The potential risk factors for hypervascular transformation of NHHNs were the diameter of the NHHN (OR = 1.69, 95% CI:1.23, 2.32, P = 0.001) and the signal intensity (SI) ratio of the NHHN to the liver in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP SI ratio*10, OR = 0.36, 95% CI:0.11, 0.85, P = 0.044). The AUC of the hypervascular transformation model was 0.846 (95% CI:0.719, 0.972).

CONCLUSION

In chronic HBV infection population, patients with older age, cirrhosis and NHHNs are more likely to develop HCC within two years. Models based on these factors or radiomic features can effectively predict HCC development. The diameter of the NHHNs and the signal intensity ratio of NHHN to the liver in the hepatobiliary phase are potential risk factors for the hypervascular transformation of NHHNs.

Liver tumor imaging staging: a multi-institutional study of a preoperative staging tool for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The current staging system has limitations in preoperatively assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in precise detailed treatment allocation. This study aims to propose a new Liver Tumor Imaging Staging (LTIS) method for HCC.

METHODS

1295 patients who underwent CT or MRI and curative liver resection during January 2012 and October 2020 were retrospectively recruited from three independent institutions. All images were interpreted by two abdominal and a board-certified radiologist. LTIS was designed to discriminate low-grade (absence of microvascular invasion [MVI] and Edmondson-Steiner grade III/IV), intermediate (MVI + or Edmondson-Steiner grade III/IV but not both) and high-grade HCC (MVI + and Edmondson-Steiner grade III/IV) upon CT and MRI. Model was constructed in 578 derivation cohort (center 1) and validated in internal center 1 test cohort (n = 291), and external center 2 (n = 226) and center 3 (n = 200), respectively. Cronbach's alpha statistics were determined to assess interobserver agreement. Net clinical benefit of LTIS on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

LTIS shows good inter-reader agreements in both CT and MRI datasets, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86 and 0.85, respectively. In independent test, LTIS achieved agreement of 73.2% (281/384), 18.9% (100/528), and 69.2% (265/383) for determining low, intermediate, and high-grade HCCs with "ground truth" results. In the Cox analysis, LTIS was comparable to "ground truth" grade for predicting RFS (hazards ratio (HR), 1.30 vs. ground truth grade, 1.36 and 1.56) and OS (HR, 1.76 vs. ground truth grade, 2.00 and 3.03) of patients after surgery. In patients conventionally classified as having low-grade tumors (serum α-fetoprotein < 400 ng/mL, stage T1), 47.4% and 35.6% were reclassified as high-grade tumors upon LTIS restaging. The resulting LTIS subgroups showed a significant difference in RFS and OS at Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LTIS provides a potential noninvasive way to precisely stage HCC using CT and MRI.

Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance with Contrast-enhanced MRI in a High-Risk Western European Cohort

AIM

To investigate the utilization of MRI using a MRI liver protocol with extracellular contrast-enhanced series for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Consecutive high-risk patients of a western European cohort who underwent repeated liver MRI for HCC screening were included. Lesions were registered according to the Liver Reporting & Data System (LIRADS) 2018. HCC was staged as very early stage HCC (BCLC stage 0) and more advanced stages of HCC (BCLC stage A-D). Differences in time interval between MRI's for BCLC stage 0 and stage A-D were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test. The HCC cumulative incidence at one-, three- and five years was calculated with the Kaplan Meier estimator.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2019 a total of 240 patients were included (71% male; median age: 57 years; IQR: 50-64 years) with 1350 MRI's. Most patients (83 %) had cirrhosis with hepatitis C as the most common underlying cause. Patients underwent on average four MRI's (IQR: 3-7). Forty-two patients (17.5%) developed HCC (52 HCC lesions: 43 LIRADS-5, eight LIRADS-4, and one LIRADS-TIV). Eighteen patients (43%) had BCLC stage 0 HCC with a significant shorter screening time interval (10 months; IQR: 6-21) compared to patients with BCLC stage A-D (21 months; IQR: 10-32) (p = 0.03). Thirty seven percent of patients with a LIRADS-3 lesion (n=43) showed HCC development within twelve months (median: 7.4 months). One, three- and five-year HCC cumulative incidence in cirrhotic patients was 1%, 10% and 17%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

High-risk patients who underwent surveillance with contrast-enhanced MRI developed HCC in 17.5 % during a follow up period of over 4 years median. Very early stage HCC was seen in compensated cirrhosis after a median time interval of 10 months. Later stages of HCC were related to prolonged screening time interval (median 21 months).

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization: Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors With or Without Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Locoregional treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic targeted immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) have achieved promising efficacy. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE and HAIC plus TKI with or without PD-1 for uHCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 2020 to February 2024, the data of 44 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI + PD-1 (THKP group) and 34 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI (THK group) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rates, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were recruited in our single-center study. The patients in THKP group had prolonged median OS [25 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.0-26.0 vs 18 months, 95% CI 16.1-19.9; p = 0.000278], median PFS [16 months, 95% CI 14.1-17.9 vs 12 months 95% CI 9.6-14.4; p = 0.004] and higher ORR (38.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0. 156) and DCR (88.6% vs 64.7%, p = 0.011) compared with those in THK group. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. The frequency of AEs were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The THKP group had better efficacy for uHCC than the THK group, with acceptable safety.

Clinical significance of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a nationwide cohort study

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion (PVI) is considered an advanced stage with a poor prognosis. Although current guidelines recommend systemic treatment for HCC with PVI, surgical resection could produce acceptable outcomes in selected patients. This study aimed to identify the clinical significance of surgical resection for HCC with PVI patients using a large-scale nationwide registry.

Methods

This retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort analyzed data from the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry. A total of 16,781 patients who were newly diagnosed with HCC between 2008 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. Patients with worse Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (≥7) or performance status (≥2) were excluded. Among them, 998 patients who received treatment for HCC with PVI were included in the analysis and were divided into two groups: resection group of 151 (15.1%) and palliative group of 847 (84.9%) who received transarterial and systemic therapy according to the treatment intent. After matching the number and size of the tumors and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score between the groups, the final study cohort for analysis comprised 151 (26.6%) patients in the resection group and 417 (73.4%) in the palliative group. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

The number and maximum size of HCC did not differ between the resection and palliative groups after matching [1 (range, 1-5) vs. 1 (range, 1-6), P=0.11 and 5.5 (range, 1.2-20.6) vs. 6.0 (range, 1.0-20.5) cm, P=0.24, respectively]. Tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), also did not differ between the groups (P=0.29 and P=0.36, respectively). The 5-year OS and CSS rates of the resection and palliative groups were 44.8% and 17.4% (P<0.001) and 47.7% and 18.6% (P<0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that palliative treatment intent was the most significant risk factor for OS and CSS [odds ratio (OR) =2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66-3.02; P<0.001 and OR =2.29; 95% CI: 1.68-3.12; P<0.001, respectively].

Conclusions

Surgical resection could significantly improve OS and CSS in selected HCC with PVI patients who have preserved liver function and performance status.

Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: Is it the end?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent form of cancer globally and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The incidence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in HCC patients is 21% at one year and 46% at three years. The presence of PVTT has consistently been associated with a poor prognosis for HCC patients over the past decades. Notably, HCC prognosis is influenced not only by the presence of PVTT but also by the degree or extent of PVTT. Currently, there is a lack of global consensus or established protocols regarding the optimal management of HCC with associated PVTT. The Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer classifies HCC patients with PVTT as stage C, indicating an advanced stage, and limiting treatment recommendations for these patients to systemic therapy. In recent years, there has been an increase in the availability of therapeutic options for HCC patients with PVTT. Treatment modalities include systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization, surgical resection, stereotactic body radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization, and liver transplantation. An ideal therapy for each patient necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. This review article presents the latest updates in managing HCC patients with PVTT.

Tumor burden score as a prognostic factor in patients with intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection: an attempt to extend resectability criteria

BACKGROUND

Surgery is currently recommended as a curative treatment option for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) belonging to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A only. This study aims to classify various BCLC groups as per Tumor Burden Score (TBS) in an attempt to identify patients who could benefit from resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients operated for HCC between January 2010 and July 2022 was performed. TBS was defined as, TBS2 = (maximum tumor diameter)2 + (number of tumors)2.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-one patients who underwent resection were staged as per the latest BCLC (A = 219, B = 45, C = 27) staging. Patients were segregated into low (<7.3) and high (>7.3) TBS. With a median follow-up of 36.2 months, the median OS for stages, A and B in the low TBS group was 107.4 and 42.7 months respectively. Median OS was not reached for patients in the BCLC C stage. In patients with high TBS, the median OS for BCLC A, B and C was 42.3, 25.72, and 16.9 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

TBS is a significant factor influencing survival in patients of HCC. TBS can be used to stratify patients in BCLC B and C stages and help select patients who would benefit from surgical resection to achieve good long-term survival with acceptable morbidity.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.

RESULTS

HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Clinical impact of CEUS on non-characterizable observations and observations with intermediate probability of malignancy on CT/MRI in patients at risk for HCC

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer allowing tumor diagnosis with identification of definitive patterns of enhancement on contrast-enhanced imaging, avoiding invasive biopsy. However, it is still unclear to what extent Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) is a clinically useful additional step when Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are inconclusive.

METHODS

A prospective international multicenter validation study for CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was conducted between January 2018 and August 2021. 646 patients at risk for HCC with focal liver lesions were enrolled. CEUS was performed using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent within 4 weeks of CT/MRI. Liver nodules were categorized based on LI-RADS (LR) criteria. Histology or one-year follow-up CT/MRI imaging results were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was evaluated for inconclusive CT/MRI scan in two scenarios for which the AASLD recommends repeat imaging or imaging follow-up: observations deemed non-characterizable (LR-NC) or with indeterminate probability of malignancy (LR-3).

RESULTS

75 observations on CT or MRI were categorized as LR-3 (n = 54) or LR-NC (n = 21) CEUS recategorization of such observations into a different LR category (namely, into one among LR-1, LR-2, LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV) resulted in management recommendation changes in 33.3% (25/75) and in all but one (96.0%, 24/25) observation, the new management recommendations were correct.

CONCLUSION

CEUS LI-RADS resulted in management recommendations change in substantial number of liver observations with initial indeterminate CT/MRI characterization, identifying both non-malignant lesions and HCC, potentially accelerating the diagnostic process and alleviating the need for biopsy or follow-up imaging.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov number, NCT03318380.

TACE plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-11 criteria: a multicenter cohort study

Background

Intermediate-stage (BCLC-B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the up-to-11 criteria represent a significant therapeutic challenge due to high and heterogeneous tumor burden. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with lenvatinib and tislelizumab for these patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with unresectable intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria were enrolled and divided into TACE monotherapy (T), TACE combined with lenvatinib (TL), or TACE plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (TLT) group based on the first-line treatment, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response according to RESIST1.1 and modified RECIST, and adverse events (AEs).

Results

There were 38, 45, and 66 patients in the T, TL, and TLT groups, respectively. The TLT group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR than the other two groups, as assessed by either mRECIST or RECIST 1.1 (all P<0.05). Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the TLT group compared with the T group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 4.4 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 18.5 months; all P<0.001) and TL group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 5.5 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 20.5 months; all P<0.05). The incidence of TRAEs was slightly higher in the TLT and TL groups than in the T group, while all the toxicities were tolerable. No treatment-related death occurred in all groups.

Conclusions

TACE combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab significantly improved the survival benefit compared with TACE monotherapy and TACE plus lenvatinib in patients with intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria, with an acceptable safety profile.

Predicting Survival Using Whole-Liver MRI Radiomics in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After TACE Refractoriness

PURPOSE

To develop a model based on whole-liver radiomics features of pre-treatment enhanced MRI for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing continued transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after TACE-resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 111 TACE-resistant HCC patients between January 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively collected. At a ratio of 7:3, patients were randomly assigned to developing and validation cohorts. The whole-liver were manually segmented, and the radiomics signature was extracted. The tumor and liver radiomics score (TLrad-score) was calculated. Models were trained by machine learning algorithms and their predictive efficacies were compared.

RESULTS

Tumor stage, tumor burden, body mass index, alpha-fetoprotein, and vascular invasion were revealed as independent risk factors for survival. The model trained by Random Forest algorithms based on tumor burden, whole-liver radiomics signature, and clinical features had the highest predictive efficacy, with c-index values of 0.85 and 0.80 and areas under the ROC curve of 0.96 and 0.83 in the developing cohort and validation cohort, respectively. In the high-rad-score group (TLrad-score > - 0.34), the median overall survival (mOS) was significantly shorter than in the low-rad-score group (17 m vs. 37 m, p < 0.001). A shorter mOS was observed in patients with high tumor burden compared to those with low tumor burden (14 m vs. 29 m, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The combined radiomics model from whole-liver signatures may effectively predict survival for HCC patients continuing TACE after TACE refractoriness. The TLrad-score and tumor burden are potential prognostic markers for TACE therapy following TACE-resistance.

Evolution of Systemic Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Changing Treatment Strategies and Concepts

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone substantial advancements. With the advent of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) combination therapy, followed by durvalumab plus tremelimumab, the era of immunotherapy for HCC has commenced. The emergence of systemic treatment with high response rates has led to improvements in overall survival while enabling conversion to radical surgical resection in some patients with HCC. In patients with intermediate-stage HCC, new treatment strategies combining systemic treatment and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) are under development in clinical trials. Moreover, the addition of local therapies, such as TACE, to systemic treatment according to the treatment effect could achieve a certain percentage of complete response. In the IMbrave050 trial, the efficacy of ATZ/BEV combination therapy was validated in patients predicted to have a high risk of recurrence, especially in those who had undergone radical surgery or radiofrequency ablation for HCC. Therefore, systemic treatment for HCC is entering a new phase for all disease stages. The objective of this review is to organize the current position of systemic therapy for each HCC stage and discuss the development of new treatment methods and strategies, with a focus on regimens incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, along with future prospects.

Examining the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Locoregional Therapy and Immunotherapy in Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma

More than 800,000 people worldwide are diagnosed with HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) each year, with approximately 700,000 deaths alone occurring in that same year. Treatment of HCC presents complex therapeutic challenges, particularly in intermediate and advanced stages. LRTs such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and ablations have been the mainstay treatment for early to intermediate-stage HCC, and systemic therapies are used to treat intermediate-late-stage HCC. However, novel literature describing combining LRT with systemic therapies has shown promising results. This review explores recent advances in both liver-directed techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma, including bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies in conjunction as well as with systemic therapies, with a focus on combination therapies, patient selection, procedural technique, periprocedural management, and outcomes. Our findings suggest that LRT combined with systemic therapies is a viable strategy for improving progression-free survival and time to progression for patients with intermediate-to-late-stage HCC. However, further investigation is required to refine treatment protocols and define patient cohorts that would benefit the most.

First-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy alone or with PD-(L)1 inhibitors in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Limited treatment options exist for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with systemic chemotherapy (SC) serving as the primary approach. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (HLP) compared to SC combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (SCP) or SC alone in treating unresectable ICC.

METHODS

Patient with unresectable ICC who underwent first-line treatment with HLP, SCP or SC from January 2016 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated and compared efficacy and safety outcomes across the three treatment groups.

RESULTS

The study comprised 42, 49, and 50 patients in the HLP, SCP, and SC groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 30.0, 10.2, and 6.5 months for HLP, SCP, and SC groups. While the SC group had a median overall survival (OS) time of 21.8 months, the HLP and SCP groups hadn't reached median OS. The HLP group demonstrated significantly superior PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) compared to the others. Moreover, the HLP group exhibited the highest objective response rate (ORR) at 50.0% and the highest disease control rate (DCR) at 88.1%, surpassing the SC group (ORR, 6.0%; DCR, 52.0%) and SCP group (ORR, 18.4%; DCR, 73.5%) (p < 0.05). Generally, the HLP group reported fewer grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) compared with others.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to systemic chemotherapy with or without PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the triple combination therapy incorporating HAIC, lenvatinib, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors showcased favorable survival benefits and manageable adverse events for unresectable ICC.

Hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after systemic treatment failure: Multicenter, real-world study

AIM

The study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety profile of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) as an alternative therapeutic choice for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is refractory to systemic treatment including immune checkpoint blockades or molecular targeting agents.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty five consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received HAIC-FOLFOX treatment after systemic treatment failure were retrospectively reviewed in six institutions and their survival, tumor response, and tolerance were assessed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival of the 209 included participants were 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1-12.9) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-6.9), respectively. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, the objective response rate was 21.1%, and the disease control rate was 64.6%. Multivariate analysis of risk factors of OS were albumin-bilirubin grade (2 and 3 vs. 1, hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-2.34; p = 0.028), tumor number (>3 vs. 1-3, HR 2.18; 95% CI, 1.10-4.34; p = 0.026), extrahepatic spread (present vs. absent, HR 1.61, 95% CI, 1.06-2.45; p = 0.027), synchronous systemic treatment (present vs. absent, HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; p = 0.004) and treatment response (responder vs. nonresponder, HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.17-0.53; p < 0.001). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 59 (28.2%) HCC patients. All AEs were manageable, and deaths related to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy treatment were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the effectiveness and safety of HAIC-FOLFOX treatment for patients with advanced HCC who have failed systemic treatment.

Comprehensive review of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: State of art and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 70%-80% of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease. Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is among the most ominous signs of advanced stage disease and has been associated with poor survival if untreated.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library and Database for Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Google Scholar, and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) databases until December 2022 was conducted using free text and MeSH terms: hepatocellular carcinoma, portal vein tumor thrombus, portal vein thrombosis, vascular invasion, liver and/or hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and systematic review.

RESULTS

Centers of surgical excellence have reported promising results related to the individualized surgical management of portal thrombus versus arterial chemoembolization or systemic chemotherapy. Critical elements to the individualized surgical management of HCC and portal thrombus include precise classification of the portal vein tumor thrombus, accurate identification of the subgroups of patients who may benefit from resection, as well as meticulous surgical technique. This review addressed five specific areas: (a) formation of PVTT; (b) classifications of PVTT; (c) controversies related to clinical guidelines; (d) surgical treatments versus non-surgical approaches; and (e) characterization of surgical techniques correlated with classifications of PVTT.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence from Chinese and Japanese high-volume centers demonstrated that patients with HCC and associated PVTT can be managed with surgical resection with acceptable results.

Prognostic Value of Preoperative MRI-derived 3D Quantitative Tumor Arterial Burden in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization

Purpose To investigate the association of tumor arterial burden (TAB) on preoperative MRI with transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness (TACER) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with HCC who underwent repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatments between January 2013 and December 2020. HCC was confirmed with pathology or imaging, and patients with other tumors, lost follow-up, or with a combination of other treatments were excluded. TACER was defined as viable lesions of more than 50% or increase in tumor number after two or more consecutive TACE treatments, continuous elevation of tumor markers, extrahepatic spread, or vascular invasion. TAB assessed with preoperative MRI was divided into high and low groups according to the median. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the predictors of TACER and PFS. Results A total of 355 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 54-67]; 306 [86.2%] men, 49 [13.8%] women) were included. During a median follow-up of 32.7 months, the high TAB group had significantly faster TACER and decreased PFS than the low TAB group (all log-rank P < .001). High TAB was the strongest independent predictor of TACER and PFS in multivariable Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23 [95% CI: 1.51, 3.29]; HR, 2.30 [95% CI: 1.61, 3.27], respectively), especially in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A or a single tumor. The restricted cubic spline plot demonstrated that the HR of TACER and PFS continuously increased with increasing TAB. Conclusion High preoperative TAB at MRI was a risk factor for faster refractoriness and progression in patients with HCC treated with TACE. Keywords: Interventional-Vascular, MR Angiography, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Progression-free Survival, MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Prognostic Role of Basal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Suitable for Curative Treatment

Background and Objectives: Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a recognized affordable oncological marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, AFP's prognostic role has been assessed mainly after specific treatments, and no unanimously recognized cut-offs have been identified. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of different basal AFP cut-offs on survival and HCC course. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, all patients newly diagnosed with HCC between January 2009 and December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Only patients suitable for curative HCC treatments were included in the analyses. Patients were stratified according to AFP cut-offs of 20, 200, 400, and 1000 ng/mL, which were correlated with survival outcomes and clinical parameters. Results: A total of 266 patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up time of 41.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all cohort was 43 months. At the multivariate Cox-regression analysis, AFP value ≥ 1000 ng/mL correlated with impaired OS (1-year OS: 67% vs. 88%, 5-year OS: 1% vs. 43%; p = 0.005); other risk factors were tumor dimension ≥ 5 cm (HR 1.73; p = 0.002), Child-Pugh class B-C (HR 1.72; p = 0.002), BCLC stage A (vs. 0) (HR 2.4; p = 0.011), and malignant portal vein thrombosis (HR 2.57; p = 0.007). AFP ≥ 1000 ng/mL was also associated with a reduced recurrence-free survival (HR 2.0; p = 0.038), while starting from AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL, a correlation with development of HCC metastases over time (HR 3.5; p = 0.002) was seen. AFP values ≥ 20 ng/mL significantly correlated with tumor size and higher histological grading; starting from AFP values ≥ 400 ng/mL, a significant correlation with Child-Pugh class B-C and female gender was also observed. Conclusions: Basal AFP correlates with relevant outcomes in patients with HCC. It could help identify patients at a higher risk of worse prognosis who might benefit from personalized surveillance and treatment programs. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy vs Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization as Adjuvant Therapy Following Surgery for MVI-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a significant pathological feature in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (a-HAIC) and adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (a-TACE), are commonly used for HCC patients with MVI. This study aims to evaluate the efficacies of two adjuvant therapies after surgical treatment for HCC, compare them, and identify the significant factors.

Methods

Clinical data from two randomized controlled trials involving HCC patients with MVI after surgical treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance baseline differences between patients who received a-HAIC or a-TACE, and control groups who underwent hepatectomy alone. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared.

Results

In total of 549 patients were collected from two randomized controlled trials. Using the PSM and Kaplan-Meier method, the median DFS of the a-HAIC, a-TACE, and control groups was 63.2, 21.7, and 11.2 months (P<0.05). The a-HAIC group show significantly better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates compared to the a-TACE and control groups (96.3%, 80.0%, 72.8% vs 84.4%, 57.0%, 29.8% vs 84.5%, 62.8%, 53.4%, P<0.05). But the OS rates of a-TACE and control groups showed no significant difference (P=0.279). Multivariate analysis identified a-HAIC (HR=0.449, P=0.000) and a-TACE (HR=0.633, P=0.007) as independent protective factors. For OS, a-HAIC (HR=0.388, P=0.003) was identified as an independent protective factor, too.

Conclusion

Compared to a-TACE and the control group, a-HAIC demonstrated greater benefits in preventing tumor recurrence and improving survival in HCC patients with MVI.

Clinical usefulness of newly developed prognostic predictive score for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to elucidate detailed parameters for prediction of prognosis for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment.

METHODS

A total of 719 patients (males 577, median age 74 years) treated with Atez/Bev between September 2020 and January 2023 were enrolled. Factors related to overall survival (OS) were extracted and a prognostic scoring system based on hazard ratio (HR) was created. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively examined, and the prognostic ability of the newly developed system was compared to CRAFITY score using concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) results.

RESULTS

Cox-hazards multivariate analysis showed BCLC classification C/D (HR 1.4; 1 point), AFP ≥100 ng/mL (HR 1.4; 1 point), mALBI 2a (HR 1.7; 1 point), mALBI 2b/3 (HR 2.8; 2 points), and DCP ≥100 mAU/mL (HR 1.6; 1 point) as significant factors. The assigned points were added and used to develop the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI-De) scoring system. For IMABALI-De scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, OS was not applicable (NA), NA, 26.11, 18.79, 14.07, and 8.32 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 2788.67, c-index 0.699), while for CRAFITY scores of 0, 1, and 2, OS was 26.11, 20.29, and 11.32 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 2864.54, c-index 0.606). PFS periods for those IMABALI-De scores were 21.75, 12.89, 9.18, 8.0, 5.0, and 3.75 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 5203.32, c-index 0.623) and for the CRAFITY scores were 10.32, 7.68, and 3.57 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 5246.61, c-index 0.574). As compared with CRAFITY score, IMABALI-De score had better AIC and c-index results for both OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicated that the proposed IMABALI-De score may be favorable for predicting prognosis of uHCC patients receiving Atez/Bev therapy.

A multicenter propensity score analysis of significance of hepatic resection type for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of hepatic resection type on long-term oncological prognosis of patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been systematically investigated. We sought to determine risk factors, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes after anatomical resection (AR) versus non-anatomical resection (NAR) for early-stage HCC.

METHODS

From a prospectively collected multicenter database, consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatectomy for early-stage HCC were identified. Recurrence patterns, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and risk factors were investigated in patients undergoing AR versus NAR using propensity score matching (PSM), subgroup analysis, and COX regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3585 patients with early-stage HCC were enrolled, including 1287 and 2298 in the AR and NAR groups, respectively. After PSM, the OS and RFS of patients in the AR group were 58.8% and 42.7%, which were higher than those in the NAR group (52.2% and 30.6%, both p < 0.01). The benefits of AR were consistent across most subgroup analyses of OS and RFS. Multivariable COX regression analysis showed that AR was independently associated with better OS and RFS. Notably, although recurrence patterns were comparable, the risk factors for recurrence were not identical for AR versus NAR. Microvascular invasion and narrow resection margin were only associated with a higher recurrence rate after NAR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that AR decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS and RFS in patients with early-stage HCC. AR should be adopted as long as such a surgical maneuver is feasible for initial treatment of early-stage HCC.

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with chronic hepatitis B in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of seven screening strategies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in China. Methods: A discrete event simulation model combining a decision tree and Markov structure was developed to simulate a CHB cohort aged ≥40 years on a lifetime horizon and evaluate the costs and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs] gained) of ultrasonography (US), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II), AFP+US, AFP+PIVKA-II, GAAD (a diagnostic algorithm based on gender and age combined with results of AFP and PIVKA-II) and GAAD+US. Epidemiologic, clinical performance, utility and cost data were obtained from the literature, expert interviews and real-world data. Uncertainties on key parameters were explored through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA and PSA). Results: Compared with other strategies, GAAD+US detected the most HCC patients at early stage, and GAAD was the screening strategy with the lowest average cost per HCC case diagnosed. Using 3× China's 2022 GDP per capita ($38,233.34) as the threshold, the three strategies of US, GAAD and GAAD+US formed a cost-effectiveness frontier. Screening with US, GAAD, or GAAD+US was associated with costs of $6110.46, $7622.05 and $8636.32, and QALYs of 13.18, 13.48 and 13.52, respectively. The ICER of GAAD over US was $4993.39/QALY and the ICER of GAAD+US over GAAD was $26,691.45/QALY, which was less than 3× GDP per capita. Both DSA and PSA proved the stability of the results. Conclusion: GAAD+US was the most cost-effective strategy for early HCC diagnosis among CHB patients which could be considered as the liver cancer screening scheme for the high-risk population in China.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for HCC refractory to TACE

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus lenvatinib and ICIs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness.

METHODS

Patients with intermediate or advanced TACE-refractory HCC who received lenvatinib and ICIs with or without HAIC between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Factors affecting OS and PFS were identified with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were enrolled, with 58 patients assigned to the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 63 patients assigned to the Len-ICI group. A higher objective response rate and disease control rate were found in the HAIC-Len-ICI group than in the Len-ICI group (48.30% vs 23.80%, P = 0.005; 87.90% vs 69.80%, P = 0.02, respectively). The median OS was 24.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 13.0 months in the Len-ICI group (P = 0.001). The median PFS was 13.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 7.2 months in the Len-ICI group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses suggested that the presence of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh B stage, and HAIC-Len-ICI therapy option were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 TRAEs were both comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC combined with lenvatinib and ICIs yielded better OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR than lenvatinib-ICI therapy in patients with HCC refractory to TACE, with manageable adverse events.

Optimizing LI-RADS: ancillary features screened from LR-3/4 categories can improve the diagnosis of HCC on MRI

OBJECTIVE

To determine the high-efficiency ancillary features (AFs) screened from LR-3/4 lesions and the HCC/non-HCC group and the diagnostic performance of LR3/4 observations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 460 patients (with 473 nodules) classified into LR-3-LR-5 categories, including 311 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 6 cases of non-HCC malignant tumors, and 156 cases of benign lesions. Two faculty abdominal radiologists with experience in hepatic imaging reviewed and recorded the major features (MFs) and AFs of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). The frequency of the features and diagnostic performance were calculated with a logistic regression model. After applying the above AFs to LR-3/LR-4 observations, the sensitivity and specificity for HCC were compared.

RESULTS

The average age of all patients was 54.24 ± 11.32 years, and the biochemical indicators ALT (P = 0.044), TBIL (P = 0.000), PLT (P = 0.004), AFP (P = 0.000) and Child‒Pugh class were significantly higher in the HCC group. MFs, mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion and AFs favoring HCC in addition to nodule-in-nodule appearance were common in the HCC group and LR-5 category. AFs screened from the HCC/non-HCC group (AF-HCC) were mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion, TP hypointensity, marked T2 hyperintensity and HBP isointensity (P = 0.005, < 0.001, = 0. 032, p < 0.001, = 0.013), and the AFs screened from LR-3/4 lesions (AF-LR) were restricted diffusion, mosaic architecture, fat in mass, marked T2 hyperintensity and HBP isointensity (P < 0.001, = 0.020, = 0.036, < 0.001, = 0.016), which were not exactly the same. After applying AF-HCC and AF-LR to LR-3 and LR-4 observations in HCC group and Non-HCC group, After the above grades changed, the diagnostic sensitivity for HCC were 84.96% using AF-HCC and 85.71% using AF-LR, the specificity were 89.26% using AF-HCC and 90.60% using AF-LR, which made a significant difference (P = 0.000). And the kappa value for the two methods of AF-HCC and AF-LR were 0.695, reaching a substantial agreement.

CONCLUSION

When adjusting for LR-3/LR-4 lesions, the screened AFs with high diagnostic ability can be used to optimize LI-RADS v2018; among them, AF-LR is recommended for better diagnostic capabilities.

Comparison of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver imaging reporting and data system to assess liver tumors before resection

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be noninvasively diagnosed through dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We compared the diagnostic performance of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in categorizing tumors by using the 2018 version of the Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS v2018) and assessing liver tumors before resection.

METHODS

Data from a prospective cohort from October 2011 to March 2019 on 106 hepatic tumors in 96 patients with suspected malignancy were included in this study. We performed preoperative CT and EOB-MRI, and reviewed these images retrospectively. Ninety-seven tumors from 87 patients were pathologically diagnosed as HCC, and nine tumors were non-HCC. The clinical data, imaging characteristics, diagnostic performance, and outcomes of CT and EOB-MRI were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

EOB-MRI had more favorable diagnostic performance (area under curve: 0.920 vs. 0.868) and significantly higher sensitivity (86.87% vs. 69.70%, p = 0.005) than did CT. However, the specificity of EOB-MRI did not differ from that of CT (88.89% vs. 88.89%, p > 0.999). Fourteen (14.5%) patients with pathologically verified HCC had lesions categorized as LI-RADS 4 through CT and as LI-RADS 5 through EOB-MRI. Patients with EOB-MRI-categorized but not CT-categorized LI-RADS 5 lesions had significantly longer overall survival than did those with LI-RADS 4 lesions (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity than did CT in diagnosing HCC. Patients with EOB-MRI-categorized LI-RADS 5 lesions had more favorable outcomes than did those with LI-RADS 4 lesions after liver resection.

Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.

Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic versus open hepatectomy in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Robotic hepatectomy (RH) is currently widely accepted and it is associated with some benefits when compared to open hepatectomy (OH). However, whether such benefits can still be achieved for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing RH or OH.

METHODS

Perioperative and survival data from patients with large HCC who underwent RH or OH between January 2010 and December 2020 were collected from eight centres. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimise potential biases.

RESULTS

Using predefined inclusion criteria, 797 patients who underwent OH and 309 patients who underwent RH were enroled in this study. After PSM, 280 patients in the robotic group had shorter operative time (median 181 vs. 201 min, P <0.001), lower estimated blood loss (median 200 vs. 400 ml, P <0.001), and shorter postoperative length of stay (median 6 vs. 9 days, P <0.001) than 465 patients in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Cox analysis showed AFP greater than 400 ng/ml, tumour size greater than 10 cm, and microvascular invasion were independent risk factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. After PSM, subgroup analysis showed that patients with a huge HCC (diameter >10 cm) who underwent RH had significantly lower estimated blood loss (median 200.0 vs. 500.0 min, P <0.001), and shorter length of stay (median 7 vs. 10 days, P <0.001) than those who underwent OH.

CONCLUSION

Safety and feasibility of RH and OH for patients with large HCC were comparable. RH resulted in similar long-term survival outcomes as OH.

Survival benefit of liver resection following complete response to transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study

BACKGROUND

High rate of tumor recurrence jeopardized the long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with complete response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aims to evaluate the survival benefit of liver resection (LR) following the complete response to TACE for intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 281 intermediate-stage HCC patients with complete response to TACE followed by persistent observation (TACE group) or LR (TLR group) from 01 January 2011 to 31 December 2021 from three institutions in China were included. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM).

RESULTS

After PSM, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 91.4, 71.5, and 57.1% in the TACE group, and 96.6, 81.8, and 72.1% in the TLR group. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DFS rates were 50.6, 22.6, and 6.8% in the TACE group, and 77.3, 56.3, and 38.7% in the TLR group. Compared with the TACE group, the TLR group showed significantly longer OS (HR, 0.528; 95% CI: 0.315-0.887; P =0.014) and DFS (HR, 0.388; 95% CI: 0.260-0.580; P <0.001). In patients beyond up-to-seven criterion, no difference was observed with OS (HR, 0.708; 95% CI: 0.354-1.419; P =0.329). LR following the complete response to TACE was safety.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that intermediate-stage HCC patients could benefit from LR following the complete response to TACE, resulting in longer OS and DFS. In addition, patients beyond up-to-seven could not benefit from the LR treatments.

Predictors for early recurrence beyond up-to-7 or distant metastasis after hepatocellular carcinoma resection: proposal for borderline resectable HCC

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reaches over 70% after 5 years and early recurrence (within 1 year) is now recognized as having a poor prognosis and has limited treatment options.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 184 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for HCC. Severe early recurrence was defined as multiple (beyond up-to-7) liver recurrence or distant metastasis after hepatic resection within 1 year. We divided the participants into two groups according to severe early recurrence and analyzed clinicopathological and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the patients with multiple or distant metastasis (n = 59), 49 patients (83%) had recurrence within 1 year. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly worse in the severe early recurrence group than in the others group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that severe early recurrence was significantly associated with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), tumor burden score (TBS) > 4.70, and ALBI grade 2. In patients with scores of 2 and 3 (the sum of the three factors), OS and RFS rates were significantly poorer than those of patients with scores of 0 or 1. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value for severe early recurrence was 68.4% and 84.2%, respectively. Furthermore, a validation study demonstrated that cases with these factors were at high risk of severe early recurrence and had poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, MVI, TBS, and ALBI could predict severe early recurrence after hepatic resection for HCC, and patients with these risk factors had a poor prognosis.

Case Report and Literature Review of Multi-drugs Synergy and Targeted Comprehensive Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A 43-year-old female patient was found to have an abnormal liver function, abnormally elevated alpha-fetoprotein and space-occupying lesions in the liver on routine screening. The patient came to our hospital for further diagnosis and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

Investigations: Laboratory investigations, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the hepatic artery, abdominal ultrasound examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were conducted using pathological staining and immunohistochemistry.

DIAGNOSIS

Clinical diagnosis: cT3NxM0. Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging: BCLC stage C. China liver cancer (CNLC) staging: CNLC IIIa.

DISCUSSION

The patient was hospitalized for the first time for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Then, the second and third hospital admissions were given HAIC based on FOLFOX. Camrelizumab and oncolytic virus were also injected into the liver cancer through the microcatheter in the first three treatments. On the fourth admission, the patient's indicators were improved, and the tumor shrank. Furthermore, as the patient suffered adverse reactions the first few times, we suspended the treatment of FOLFOX and the oncolytic virus. Before surgical treatment, lenvatinib was used throughout the treatment. On the fifth admission, the patient underwent liver cancer resection.

CONCLUSION

It proves the value of multiple combination therapy, which can provide guidance for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma that cannot be surgically removed.

Implanting Iodine-125 Seed Strand Inside the Portal Vein Stent: An Improved Approach to Endovascular Brachytherapy for Treatment of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of implanting an iodine-125 (125I) seed strand inside a portal vein stent (PVS) in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and main portal vein tumor thrombus (mPVTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients who diagnosed with HCC and mPVTT and underwent endovascular implantation 125I seed strands and portal vein stenting were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. For patients in group A (n = 12), the 125I seed strand was placed outside the PVS, and for those in group B (n = 11), the strand was placed inside the PVS. Technical success, pain intensity during the procedure (numeric rating scale), procedure-related complications, changes in liver function, stent patency, and survival rates were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The procedures were successful in all patients, and no serious procedure-related complications occurred in either group. Pain intensity during the procedure was significantly lower in group B than in group A (2.64 ± 1.50 vs 4.08 ± 1.78, p = 0.048), and there were no significant differences between pre- and post-procedure liver function in either group. The median duration of stent patency was 9 months (95% CI 2.21-15.79 months) in group A and 12 months (95% CI 3.63-18.37 months) in group B (p = 0.670). Median survival was 12 months (95% CI 10.30-13.70 months) in group A and 13 months (95% CI 10.03-15.97 months) in group B (p = 0.822). The cumulative stent patency and survival rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 75%, 50%, and 41.7%, and 83.3%, 75%, and 50% in group A and 72.7%, 62.3%, and 31.2%, and 90.9%, 80.8%, and 50.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of 125I seed strand inside the PVS is effective and feasible for treating patients with HCC and mPVTT.

US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after curative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 644 patients between January 2018 and August 2018 as a derivation cohort, and 397 patients from September 2018 to December 2018 as a validation cohort. The US surveillance after HCC curative treatment was performed. The US LI-RADS observation categories and visualization scores were analyzed. Four criteria using US LI-RADS or Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as the surveillance algorithm were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 212 (32.9%) patients in derivation cohort and 158 (39.8%) patients in validation cohort were detected to have RHCCs. The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L had higher sensitivity (derivation, 96.7% vs 92.9% vs 81.1% vs 90.6%; validation, 96.2% vs 90.5% vs 80.4% vs 89.9%) and NPV (derivation, 95.7% vs 93.3% vs 88.0% vs 91.8%; validation, 94.6% vs 89.4% vs 83.6% vs 89.0%), but lower specificity (derivation, 35.9% vs 48.2% vs 67.6% vs 51.9%; validation, 43.5% vs 52.7% vs 66.1% vs 54.0%) than criterion of US-2/3, US-3, and US-3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L. Analysis of the visualization score subgroups confirmed that the sensitivity (89.2-97.6% vs 81.0-83.3%) and NPV(88.4-98.0% vs 80.0-83.3%) of score A and score B groups were higher than score C group in criterion of US-2/3 in both two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surveillance for RHCC, US LI-RADS with AFP had a high sensitivity and NPV when US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L was considered a criterion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L improves sensitivity and NPV for RHCC surveillance, which provides a valuable reference for patients in RHCC surveillance after curative treatment.

KEY POINTS

• US LI-RADS with AFP had high sensitivity and NPV in surveillance for RHCC when considering US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L as a criterion. • After US with AFP surveillance, patients with US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L should perform enhanced imaging for confirmative diagnosis. Patients with US-1 or AFP < 20 µg/L continue to repeat US with AFP surveillance. • Patients with risk factors for poor visualization scores limited the sensitivity of US surveillance in RHCC.