Melanoma and rituximab: an incidental association?

Targeting CD20-expressing malignant melanoma cells augments BRAF inhibitor killing

BACKGROUND

Mutant BRAF targeted therapies remain a standard of care for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma (MM); however, high initial response rates are tempered by the persistence of residual MM cells that eventually lead to disease recurrence and mortality. As MM recurrence during targeted therapy can present with the simultaneous occurrence of multiple tumour nodules at the original body sites, we hypothesized the presence of an intrinsically resistant MM cell subpopulation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify an MM cell subpopulation that is intrinsically resistant to targeted therapy and possibly responsible for MM recurrence.

METHODS

Using melanoma cell lines, we defined culture conditions for the reproducible three-dimensional growth of melanospheres to investigate putative cancer stem cell populations. We undertook RNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to characterize cell populations between adherent and nonadherent culture, and cells expressing or not expressing CD20. Furthermore, we defined an in vitro assay to evaluate the killing of melanoma cancer stem cells as a therapeutic test using combination therapies targeting driver mutation and CD20.

RESULTS

We described the culture conditions that promote MM cells to form melanospheres with a reproducible colony-forming efficiency rate of 0.3-1.3%. RNA sequencing of melanosphere vs. conventional MM cell cultures (n = 6), irrespective of the BRAF mutation status, showed that melanosphere formation was associated with growth and differentiation transcriptional signatures resembling MM tumours. Importantly, melanosphere formation also led to the emergence of a CD20+ MM cell subpopulation, similar to that observed in primary human MM tumours. CD20+ MM cells were resistant to BRAF inhibitor therapy and, consistent with this finding, demonstrated a Forkhead box protein M1 transcriptomic profile (n = 6). Combining BRAF inhibitor and anti-CD20 antibody treatment led to the additional killing of previously resistant CD20+  BRAF mutant MM cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MM that harbour a CD20+ subpopulation, combined therapy with BRAF inhibitor and anti-CD20 antibody could potentially kill residual MM cells and prevent disease recurrence.

Cutaneous malignancies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common lymphoid malignancy that is associated with an increased risk of developing cutaneous malignancies. Clinical outcomes for these malignancies, including melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (KC), are worse for patients with CLL. Individuals with CLL develop an immunodeficiency of both the adaptive and innate immune system, which plays a role in the increased prevalence of skin cancers. This review focuses on the complex interplay between genetics, immunity, and pathogens that influence the cellular composition and biology of skin tumors and their microenvironment in CLL patients, and in comparison with other chronic hematological malignancies. It is paramount for dermatologists to be aware of the association between CLL (and chronic hematological malignancies more broadly) and cutaneous malignancies. This is a high-risk population who require regular and vigorous dermatologic follow-up.

Use of Rituximab in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Rituximab is an established therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to sustain short- to medium-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. Recent trials focus on its use as a first-line agent among those with milder disease severity. Rituximab is used in multidrug refractory nephrotic syndrome and post-transplant disease recurrence, although the evidence is much less substantial. Available data suggest that the treatment response to rituximab depends on various patient factors, dosing regimen, and the concomitant use of maintenance immunosuppression. After repeated treatments, patients are found to have an improving response overall with a longer relapse-free period. The drug effect, however, is not permanent, and 80% of patients eventually relapse and many will require an additional course of rituximab. This underpins the importance of understanding the long-term safety profile on repeated treatments. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are concerns about long-term hypogammaglobulinemia, especially in young children. Reliable immunophenotyping and biomarkers are yet to be discovered to predict treatment success, risk of both rare and severe side effects, e.g. , persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and guiding of redosing strategy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of rituximab for childhood nephrotic syndrome and how the therapeutic landscape is evolving.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Rituximab to Maintain Remission in Idiopathic Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome: An International Study

Background: Long-term outcomes following multiple rituximab courses among children with frequently-relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) are unknown. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at 16 pediatric nephrology centers from 10 countries in Asia, Europe, and North America included children with FRSDNS who received ≥2 rituximab courses. Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival and adverse events. Results: 346 children (age 9.8 years, IQR 6.6-13.5; 73% boys) received 1149 rituximab courses. 145, 83, 50, 28, 22, and 18 children received 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥7 courses, respectively. Median follow-up was 5.9 years (IQR, 4.3-7.7). Relapse-free survival differed by treatment courses (clustered log-rank test p<0.001). Compared to the first course (10.0 months, 95% CI, 9.0-10.7), relapse-free period and relapse risk progressively improved following subsequent courses (12.0-16.0 months; HRadj, 0.03-0.13; 95% CI, 0.01-0.18; ps<0.001). B-cell depletion duration remained similar with repeated treatments (6.1 months, 95% CI, 6.0-6.3). Adverse events were mostly mild, most commonly hypogammaglobulinemia (50.9%), infection (4.5%), and neutropenia (3.7%). Side effects did not increase with more treatment courses nor higher cumulative dose. Only 78 of the 353 episodes of hypogammaglobulinemia were clinically significant. Younger age at presentation (2.8 vs 3.3 years; p=0.05) and at first rituximab (8.0 y vs 10.0 years; p=0.01) and history of steroid resistance (28% vs 18%; p=0.01) were associated with significant hypogammaglobulinemia. All 53 infective episodes resolved, except one patient with hepatitis B infection and another with EBV infection. There were 42 episodes of neutropenia, associated with history of steroid resistance (30% vs 20%, p=0.04). Upon last follow-up, 332 children (96%) had normal kidney function. Conclusion: Children receiving repeated rituximab for FRSDNS experience an improving clinical response. Side effects appear acceptable but significant complications can occur. These findings support repeated rituximab use in FRSDNS.

Impact of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia on melanoma outcomes: A retrospective case-control study

With new, effective treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) the impact of second malignancies is increasingly important. We performed a retrospective case‐controlled study examining the effect of CLL and its treatment on melanoma‐specific survival and recurrence. A total of 56 patients with melanoma with CLL were matched 1:1 to patients without CLL for age, date of diagnosis, gender and melanoma tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) stage. Multivariate analysis found CLL was associated with significantly worse melanoma‐specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–4.74, p = 0.007) and recurrence (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.79–6.63, p < 0.001). Patients with CLL had poor immunotherapy tolerance and prior CLL treatment was not associated with melanoma outcomes.

The immunologic balance: three cases of rituximab-associated melanoma

Currently, there is no known clinical evidence that rituximab increases the rate of subsequent primary malignancies; however, some studies have raised the question of increased melanoma risk following rituximab treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We report three interesting cases of suspected rituximab-induced melanoma. We hypothesize that this association is secondary to rituximab-driven shifts in the immunologic balance. Based on these cases, it is possible that the number of post-rituximab melanoma cases is underreported. Further mechanistic research into individual cases and population-level studies are required to better define association and risk; however, given the increasing prevalence of oncologic and nononcologic rituximab use, awareness across all fields is essential.

Rituximab in children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: in quest of the optimal regimen

Rituximab has emerged as an effective and important therapy in children with complicated frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome to induce long-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. The optimal rituximab regimen is not totally well defined, and there are many varying practices worldwide. We will in this review describe how patient factors, rituximab dose, and use of maintenance immunosuppression affect treatment outcomes. Specifically, low-dose rituximab without concomitant immunosuppression is associated with shorter relapse-free duration while other regimens have comparable outcomes. Patients with more severe disease generally have worse response to rituximab. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are growing concerns of chronic hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired immunity especially in young children. Reliable prognostications and biomarkers for guiding subsequent treatments to avoid excessive treatments are yet to be identified. In this review, we will outline the, as we see it, best approach of rituximab in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome at the present state of knowledge.

Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview

Since we have gained an understanding of the immunological pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment based on biological drugs has become a fundamental axis. These therapies are oriented towards the regulation of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and the modulation of cell-mediated immunity (B cells and T cells) by anti CD20 or anti CTAL-4 agents, and can increase the risk of associated infections or adverse events (AE). In this context, the entry of biotherapeutics represented a challenge for pharmacovigilance, risk management and approval by the main global regulatory agencies regarding biosimilars, where efficacy and safety are based on comparability exercises without being an exact copy in terms of molecular structure. The objective of this review is divided into three fundamental aspects: (i) to illustrate the evolution and focus of pharmacovigilance at the biopharmaceutical level, (ii) to describe the different approved recommendations of biopharmaceuticals (biological and biosimilars) and their use in rheumatic diseases (RDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other less frequent RD like cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (CAPS), and (iii) to identify the main AE reported in the post-marketing phase of RD biopharmaceuticals.

Clinical considerations about the coexistence of melanoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of targeted therapies, triggered by rare clinical scenarios. A case series and review of the literature

The epidemiologic correlation of melanoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been the subject of several population studies. In the present article, through the presentation of five illustrative cases of patients with melanoma and CLL, several aspects of this complex relationship are highlighted, with a focus on the increased incidence of melanoma in patients with CLL, its speculated etiology, and the impact of CLL stage and disease duration on the incidence and prognosis of melanoma. Furthermore, the rare entity of the synchronous diagnosis of melanoma and CLL in biopsied lymph nodes is discussed, along with its implications on the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In addition, the available data on the treatment choices in patients with melanoma and CLL are presented and the efficacy and safety of fludarabine, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, new targeted therapies for CLL, and checkpoint inhibitors are further discussed. Finally, since no formal guidelines are available for the management of this group of patients, guidelines are proposed for skin-cancer screening in patients with CLL, for the correct interpretation of BRAF mutation analysis in lymph-node specimens with ‘collision of tumors,’ and for the optimal use of imaging studies in the diagnosis of metastatic disease in patients with CLL and melanoma, while a treatment approach for such patients is also suggested. The information and proposed guidelines provided in the present article comprise a useful guide for physicians managing such patients, focusing on diagnostic challenges and therapeutic dilemmas posed by the coexistence of the two disease entities.

Both the rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression in steroid-dependent/frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome have important effects on outcomes

Rituximab is an effective treatment for steroid-dependent/ frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDFRNS) in children. However, the optimal rituximab regimen remains unknown. To help determine this we conducted an international, multicenter retrospective study at 11 tertiary pediatric nephrology centers in Asia, Europe and North America of children 1-18 years of age with complicated SDFRNS receiving rituximab between 2005-2016 for 18 or more months follow-up. The effect of rituximab prescribed at three dosing levels: low (375mg/m²), medium (750mg/m²) and high (1125-1500mg/m²), with or without maintenance immunosuppression (defined as concurrent use of corticosteroids, mycophenolate motile or calcineurin inhibition at first relapse or for at least six months following the rituximab treatment) was examined. Among the 511 children (median age 11.5 year, 67% boys), 191, 208 and 112 received low, medium and high dose rituximab, respectively. Within this total cohort of 511 children, 283 (55%) received maintenance immunosuppression. Renal biopsies were performed in 317 children indicating the predominant histology was minimal change disease (74%). Without maintenance immunosuppression, low-dose rituximab had a shorter relapse-free period and a higher relapse risk (8.5 months) than medium (12.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62) and high dose (14.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; all significant). With maintenance immunosuppression, the relapse-free survival in low-dose rituximab (14 months) was similar to medium (10.9 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23) and high dose (12.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; all non-significant). Most adverse events were mild. Thus, children receiving low-dose rituximab without maintenance immunosuppression had the shortest relapse-free survival. Hence, both rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression have important effects on the treatment outcomes.

Monoclonal Antibodies in Dermatooncology-State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting specific proteins are currently the most popular form of immunotherapy used in the treatment of cancer and other non-malignant diseases. Since the first approval of anti-CD20 mAb rituximab in 1997 for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, the market is continuously booming and the clinically used mAbs have undergone a remarkable evolution. Novel molecular targets are constantly emerging and the development of genetic engineering have facilitated the introduction of modified mAbs with improved safety and increased capabilities to activate the effector mechanisms of the immune system. Next to their remarkable success in hematooncology, mAbs have also an already established role in the treatment of solid malignancies. The recent development of mAbs targeting the immune checkpoints has opened new avenues for the use of this form of immunotherapy, also in the immune-rich milieu of the skin. In this review we aim at presenting a comprehensive view of mAbs' application in the modern treatment of skin cancer. We present the characteristics and efficacy of mAbs currently used in dermatooncology and summarize the recent clinical trials in the field. We discuss the side effects and strategies for their managing.

Cross-platform comparison of independent datasets identifies an immune signature associated with improved survival in metastatic melanoma

Platform and study differences in prognostic signatures from metastatic melanoma (MM) gene expression reports often hinder consensus arrival. We performed survival/outcome-based pairwise comparisons of three independent MM gene expression profiles using the threshold-free algorithm rank-rank hypergeometric overlap analysis (RRHO). We found statistically significant overlap for genes overexpressed in favorable outcome (FO) groups, but no overlap for poor outcome (PO) groups. This “favorable outcome signature” (FOS) of 228 genes coinciding on all three overlapping gene lists showed immune function predominated in FO MM. Surprisingly, specific cell signature-enrichment analysis showed B cell-associated genes enriched in FO MM, along with T cell-associated genes. Higher levels of B and T cells (p<0.05) and their relative proximity (p<0.05) were detected in FO-to-PO tumor comparisons from an independent MM patients cohort. Finally, expression of FOS in two independent Stage III MM tumor datasets correctly predicted clinical outcome in 12/14 and 44/70 patients using a weighted gene voting classifier (area under the curve values 0.96 and 0.75, respectively). This RRHO-based, cross-study analysis emphasizes the RRHO approach power, confirms T cells relevance for prolonged MM survival, supports a favorable role for B cells in anti-melanoma immunity, and suggests B cells potential as means of intervention in melanoma treatment.

Rituximab in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: lessons from clinical trials

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. A total of 80-90% of patients with childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with steroid therapy [steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS)]. However, approximately 50% of children with SSNS develop frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). Children with FRNS or SDNS are usually treated with immunosuppressive agents, but 10-20% of children receiving immunosuppressive agents still show frequent relapses or steroid dependence during or after treatment, defined as complicated FRNS or SDNS. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that was originally developed to treat patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is currently used for treating SSNS. In this review we highlight recent studies, mainly randomized controlled trials of rituximab for SSNS, including complicated and uncomplicated forms of FRNS or SDNS in children. We also discuss the effects of these studies on the management of patients suffering from these conditions.

Long-term outcome of childhood-onset complicated nephrotic syndrome after a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab

BACKGROUND

Although rituximab effectively prevents relapses of complicated frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), data of long-term outcomes and safety are limited.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (age, 3-38 years) with childhood-onset complicated FRNS or SDNS, who received rituximab in investigator-initiated multicenter prospective trials were enrolled. Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m² once weekly for 4 weeks, and immunosuppressive agents were discontinued according to the study protocol. We investigated relapses, re-administration of immunosuppressive agents, additional rituximab treatment, body height, renal function, and late adverse events during the observation period.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (94%) developed relapses during the observation period (median, 59 months) and the 50% relapse-free survival was 261 days. Thirty patients (59%) developed SDNS, 44 (86%) required re-administration of immunosuppressive agents, and 22 (43%) received additional rituximab treatment. All patients who were receiving immunosuppressive agents at rituximab treatment required either immunosuppressive agents or additional rituximab treatment. On the contrary, 5 of the 13 patients without immunosuppressive agents at rituximab treatment required neither immunosuppressive agents nor additional rituximab treatment and 3 of them did not develop relapse during observation period. Growth failure due to steroid toxicity did not progress and none of the patients developed chronic renal insufficiency. None of the patients suffered from rituximab-related late adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

As most patients suffer from relapses after B-cell recovery, long-term immunosuppressive agents or additional rituximab treatment is necessary. However, some patients who can discontinue immunosuppressive agents before rituximab treatment may achieve long-term remission after rituximab treatment without immunosuppressive agents.

Subsequent primary malignancies after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern treatment era

With the addition of rituximab and other treatment advances, survival after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has improved, but subsequent primary malignancies (SPMs) have emerged as an important challenge for DLBCL survivorship. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SPMs among 23 879 patients who survived at least 1 year after a first primary DLBCL diagnosed during 1989-2012, compared to the general population in California. Cumulative incidence (CMI) of SPMs, accounting for the competing risk of death, also was calculated. We found that the incidence of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) nearly doubled in the post-rituximab era [SIR (95% CI) 4·39 (2·51-7·13) pre- (1989-2000) and 8·70 (6·62-11·22) post-rituximab (2001-2012)]. Subsequent thyroid cancer was rare pre-rituximab, but increased substantially after 2001 [0·66 (0·08-2·37) vs. 2·27(1·44-3·41)]. The 5-year CMI for all SPMs (4·77% pre- vs. 5·41% post-rituximab, P = 0·047), AML (0·15% vs. 0·41%, P = 0·003), thyroid cancer (0·03% vs. 0·15%, P = 0·003) and melanoma (0·25% vs. 0·42%, P = 0·020) were greater in DLBCL patients diagnosed in the post- versus pre-rituximab period. This study provides insight into the changing pattern of SPM occurrence after the introduction of rituximab, which may elucidate the aetiology of SPMs and should guide future cancer surveillance efforts among DLBCL patients.

Report of ipilimumab in a heart transplant patient with metastatic melanoma on tacrolimus

Ipilimumab is the first immunotherapy shown to increase overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Currently, there are no accepted guidelines for use of ipilimumab in organ transplant patients. There is only one report in the literature on successful administration of ipilimumab in two kidney transplant recipients. In this report, a heart transplant patient with metastatic melanoma was successfully treated with ipilimumab. He experienced no adverse drug reactions. However, after standard treatment with regimen of four doses at 3 mg/kg, he experienced disease progression. Here, we address concerns of organ rejection or ineffective treatment when using ipilimumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients who are chronically immunosuppressed.

Treatment Options for Primary Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: A Short Comprehensive Review

Until now, treatment of primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia of the warm type (wAIHA) is primarily based on immunosuppression. However, many patients do not respond adequately to treatment, and treated patients may develop severe side effects due to uncontrolled, mixed and/or long-lasting immunosuppression. Unfortunately, the newly used therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are unspecific and remain frequently ineffective. Thus, development of a specific therapy for AIHA is necessary. The ideal therapy would be the identification and elimination of the causative origin of autoimmunization and/or the correction or reprogramming of the dysregulated immune components. Blood transfusion is the most rapidly effective measure for patients who develop or may develop hypoxic anemia. Although some effort has been made to guide physicians on how to adequately treat patients with AIHA, a number of individual aspects should be considered prior to treatment. Based on my serological and clinical experience and the analysis of evidence-based studies, we remain far from any optimized therapeutic measures for all AIHA patients. Today, the old standard therapy using controlled steroid administration, with or without azathioprine or cyclophosphamide, is, when complemented with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, still the most effective therapy in wAIHA. Rituximab or other monoclonal antibodies may be used instead of splenectomy in therapy-refractory patients.