How is urine concentrated by the renal inner medulla?

Solute and water transport along an inner medullary collecting duct undergoing peristaltic contractions

The mechanism by which solutes accumulate in the inner medulla of the mammalian kidney has remained incompletely understood. That persistent mystery has led to hypotheses based on the peristaltic contractions of the pelvic wall smooth muscles. It has been demonstrated the peristaltic contractions propel fluid down the collecting duct in boluses. In antidiuresis, boluses are sufficiently short that collecting ducts may be collapsed most of the time. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which about half of the bolus volume is reabsorbed into the collecting duct cells despite the short contact time. To accomplish this, we developed a dynamic mathematical model of solute and water transport along a collecting duct of a rat papilla undergoing peristaltic contractions. The model predicts that, given preexisting axial concentration gradients along the loops of Henle, ∼40% of the bolus volume is reabsorbed as the bolus flows down the inner medullary collecting duct. Additionally, simulation results suggest that while the contraction-induced luminal hydrostatic pressure facilitates water extraction from the bolus, that pressure is not necessary to concentrate the bolus. Also, neither the negative interstitial pressure generated during the relaxation phase nor the concentrating effect of hyaluronic acid has a significant effect on bolus concentration. Taken together, these findings indicate that the high collecting duct apical water permeability allows a substantial amount of water to be extracted from the bolus, despite its short transit time. However, the potential role of the peristaltic waves in the urine-concentrating mechanism remains to be revealed.

Advances in Understanding the Urine-Concentrating Mechanism

The renal medulla produces concentrated urine through the generation of an osmotic gradient that progressively increases from the cortico-medullary boundary to the inner medullary tip. In the outer medulla, the osmolality gradient arises principally from vigorous active transport of NaCl, without accompanying water, from the thick ascending limbs of short- and long-looped nephrons. In the inner medulla, the source of the osmotic gradient has not been identified. Recently, there have been important advances in our understanding of key components of the urine-concentrating mechanism, including (a) better understanding of the regulation of water, urea, and sodium transport proteins; (b) better resolution of the anatomical relationships in the medulla; and (c) improvements in mathematical modeling of the urine-concentrating mechanism. Continued experimental investigation of signaling pathways regulating transepithelial transport, both in normal animals and in knockout mice, and incorporation of the resulting information into mathematical simulations may help to more fully elucidate the mechanism for concentrating urine in the inner medulla.

Urea transporter knockout mice and their renal phenotypes

Urea transporter gene knockout mice have been created for the study of the urine-concentrating mechanism. The major findings in studies of the renal phenotype of these mice are as follows: (1) Urea accumulation in the inner medullary interstitium is dependent on intrarenal urea recycling mediated by urea transporters; (2) urea transporters are essential for preventing urea-induced osmotic diuresis and thus for water conservation; (3) NaCl concentration in the inner medullary interstitium is not significantly affected by the absence of IMCD, descending limb of Henle and descending vasa recta urea transporters. Studies in urea transporter knockout mouse models have highlighted the essential role of urea for producing maximally concentrated urine.

An online tool for calculation of free-energy balance for the renal inner medulla

Concentrating models of the renal inner medulla can be classified according to external free-energy balance into passive models (positive values) and models that require an external energy source (negative values). Here we introduce an online computational tool that implements the equations of Stephenson and colleagues (Stephenson JL, Tewarson RP, Mejia R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 1618-1622, 1974) to calculate external free-energy balance at steady state for the inner medulla (http://helixweb.nih.gov/ESBL/FreeEnergy). Here "external free-energy balance" means the sum of free-energy flows in all streams entering and leaving the inner medulla. The program first assures steady-state mass balance for all components and then tallies net external free-energy balance for the selected flow conditions. Its use is illustrated by calculating external free-energy balance for an example of the passive concentrating model taken from the original paper by Kokko and Rector (Kokko JP, Rector FC Jr. Kidney Int 2: 214-223, 1972).

The physiology of urinary concentration: an update

The renal medulla produces concentrated urine through the generation of an osmotic gradient extending from the cortico-medullary boundary to the inner medullary tip. This gradient is generated in the outer medulla by the countercurrent multiplication of a comparatively small transepithelial difference in osmotic pressure. This small difference, called a single effect, arises from active NaCl reabsorption from thick ascending limbs, which dilutes ascending limb flow relative to flow in vessels and other tubules. In the inner medulla, the gradient may also be generated by the countercurrent multiplication of a single effect, but the single effect has not been definitively identified. There have been important recent advances in our understanding of key components of the urine concentrating mechanism. In particular, the identification and localization of key transport proteins for water, urea, and sodium, the elucidation of the role and regulation of osmoprotective osmolytes, better resolution of the anatomical relationships in the medulla, and improvements in mathematic modeling of the urine concentrating mechanism. Continued experimental investigation of transepithelial transport and its regulation, both in normal animals and in knock-out mice, and incorporation of the resulting information into mathematic simulations, may help to more fully elucidate the inner medullary urine concentrating mechanism.

Essential role of vasopressin-regulated urea transport processes in the mammalian kidney

Movement of urea across plasma membranes is modulated by specialized urea transporter proteins. Two urea-transporter genes have been cloned: UT-A (Slc14a2) and UT-B (Slc14a1). In the mammalian kidney, urea transporters are essential for the urinary concentrating mechanism and maintaining body fluid homeostasis. In this article, we discuss (1) an overview of historic discoveries in urea transport mechanisms; (2) an overview of recent discoveries in the regulation of urea transporters; (3) physiological studies in UT-A1/3 (-/-) mice highlighting the essential role of urea transporters in the urinary concentrating mechanism; and (4) physiological studies in UT-A2 and UT-B knockout mice examining the role of countercurrent exchange in the production of a maximally concentrated urine.

Urea transporters and renal function: lessons from knockout mice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gene knockout mice have been created for the collecting duct urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A3, the descending thin-limb urea transporter UT-A2 and the descending vasa recta isoform, UT-B. In this brief review, the new insights in our understanding of the role of urea in the urinary concentrating mechanism and kidney function resulting from studies in these mice are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The major findings in studies on urea transporter knockout mice are as follows: rapid transport of urea from the inner medulla collecting duct lumen via UT-A1 or UT-A3 is essential for urea accumulation in the inner medullary interstitium; inner medulla collecting duct urea transporters are essential in water conservation by preventing urea-induced osmotic diuresis; an absence of inner medulla collecting duct urea transport does not prevent the concentration of sodium chloride in the inner medulla interstitium; deletion of the vasa recta isoform UT-B has a much greater effect on urinary concentration than deleting the descending limb isoform UT-A2.

SUMMARY

Multiple urea transport mechanisms within the kidney are essential for producing maximally concentrated urine.

Mouse models and the urinary concentrating mechanism in the new millennium

Our understanding of urinary concentrating and diluting mechanisms at the end of the 20th century was based largely on data from renal micropuncture studies, isolated perfused tubule studies, tissue analysis studies and anatomical studies, combined with mathematical modeling. Despite extensive data, several key questions remained to be answered. With the advent of the 21st century, a new approach, transgenic and knockout mouse technology, is providing critical new information about urinary concentrating processes. The central goal of this review is to summarize findings in transgenic and knockout mice pertinent to our understanding of the urinary concentrating mechanism, focusing chiefly on mice in which expression of specific renal transporters or receptors has been deleted. These include the major renal water channels (aquaporins), urea transporters, ion transporters and channels (NHE3, NKCC2, NCC, ENaC, ROMK, ClC-K1), G protein-coupled receptors (type 2 vasopressin receptor, prostaglandin receptors, endothelin receptors, angiotensin II receptors), and signaling molecules. These studies shed new light on several key questions concerning the urinary concentrating mechanism including: 1) elucidation of the role of water absorption from the descending limb of Henle in countercurrent multiplication, 2) an evaluation of the feasibility of the passive model of Kokko-Rector and Stephenson, 3) explication of the role of inner medullary collecting duct urea transport in water conservation, 4) an evaluation of the role of tubuloglomerular feedback in maintenance of appropriate distal delivery rates for effective regulation of urinary water excretion, and 5) elucidation of the importance of water reabsorption in the connecting tubule versus the collecting duct for maintenance of water balance.

Role of collecting duct urea transporters in the kidney--insights from mouse models

Urea movement across plasma membranes is modulated by specialized urea transporter proteins. These proteins are proposed to play key roles in the urinary concentrating mechanism and fluid homeostasis. To date, two urea-transporter genes have been cloned; UT-A (Slc14a2), encoding at least five proteins and UT-B (Slc14a1) encoding a single protein isoform. Recently we engineered mice that lack the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) urea transporters, UT-A1 and UT-A3 (UT-A1/3 -/- mice). This article includes 1) a historical review of the role of renal urea transporters in renal function; 2) a review of our studies utilizing the UT-A1/3 -/- mice; 3) description of an additional line of transgenic mice in which beta-galactosidase expression is driven by the alpha-promoter of the UT-A gene, which is allowing better physiological definition of control mechanisms for UT-A expression; and 4) a discussion of the implications of the studies in transgenic mice for the teaching of kidney physiology.

Gamble's "economy of water" revisited: studies in urea transporter knockout mice

The Gamble phenomenon (initially described over 70 years ago as "an economy of water in renal function referable to urea") suggested that urea plays a special role in the urinary concentrating mechanism and that the concentrating mechanism depends in some complex way on an interaction between NaCl and urea. In this study, the role of collecting duct urea transporters in the Gamble phenomenon was investigated in wild-type mice and mice in which the inner medulla collecting duct (IMCD) facilitative urea transporters, UT-A1 and UT-A3, had been deleted (UT-A1/3-/- mice). The general features of the Gamble phenomenon were confirmed in wild-type mice, namely 1) the water requirement for the excretion of urea is less than for the excretion of an osmotically equivalent amount of NaCl; and 2) when fed various mixtures of urea and salt in the diet, less water is required for the excretion of the two substances together than the amount of water needed for the excretion of the two substances separately. In UT-A1/3-/- mice both of these elements of the phenomenon were absent, indicating that IMCD urea transporters play a central role in the Gamble phenomenon. A titration study in which wild-type mice were given progressively increasing amounts of urea showed that the ability of the kidney to reabsorb urea was saturable, resulting in osmotic diuresis above excretion rates of approximately 6,000 microosmol/day. In the same titration experiments, when increasing amounts of NaCl were added to the diet, mice were unable to increase urinary NaCl concentrations to >420 mM, resulting in osmotic diuresis at NaCl excretion rates of approximately 3,500 microosmol/day. Thus both urea and NaCl can induce osmotic diuresis when large amounts are given, supporting the conclusion that the decrease in water excretion with mixtures of urea and NaCl added to the diet (compared with pure NaCl or urea) is due to the separate abilities of urea and NaCl to induce osmotic diuresis, rather than to any specific interaction of urea transport and NaCl transport at an epithelial level.

Angiotensin III as well as angiotensin II regulates water flow through aquaporins in a clam worm

Angiotensin III has been reported to exist in various animals and tissues. The physiological role, however, is still unclear except that brain angiotensin III is a central regulator of vasopressin release. In this study, angiotensin III as well as angiotensin II enhanced an increase in body weight of clam worms of Perinereis sp. under a hypo-osmotic condition and suppressed a decrease in body weight under a hyper-osmotic condition. When clam worms were treated with tetrachloroaurate (III) after angiotensin-treatment, these enhancing and suppressive effects of the angiotensins under hypo- and hyper-osmotic conditions were inhibited. In contrast, when clam worms were pretreated with tetrachloroaurate (III) before angiotensin-treatment, these effects of angiotensins were not inhibited. Since tetrachloroaurate (III) is a representative blocker of aquaporins, these results indicate that angiotensin III as well as angiotensin II regulates water flow through aquaporins in clam worms.

Concentration of solutes in the renal inner medulla: interstitial hyaluronan as a mechano-osmotic transducer

Although the concentrating process in the renal outer medulla is well understood, the concentrating mechanism in the renal inner medulla remains an enigma. The purposes of this review are fourfold. 1) We summarize a theoretical basis for classifying all possible steady-state inner medullary countercurrent concentrating mechanisms based on mass balance principles. 2) We review the major hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the axial osmolality gradient in the interstitium of the renal inner medulla. 3) We summarize and expand on the Schmidt-Nielsen hypothesis that the contractions of the renal pelvocalyceal wall may provide an important energy source for concentration in the inner medulla. 4) We discuss the special properties of hyaluronan, a glycosaminoglycan that is the chief component of a gel-like renal inner medullary interstitial matrix, which may allow it to function as a mechano-osmotic transducer, converting energy from the contractions of the pelvic wall to an axial osmolality gradient in the medulla. These considerations set the stage for renewed experimental investigation of the urinary concentrating process and a new generation of mathematical models of the renal concentrating mechanism, which treat the inner medullary interstitium as a viscoelastic system rather than a purely hydraulic system.

The renal pelvis: machinery that concentrates urine in the papilla

Two decades ago, Bodil Schmidt-Nielsen and Bruce Graves documented the rhythmic contractions of the renal pelvis in a remarkable video, visually demonstrating how peristaltic waves empty the papilla and how the subsequent elastic recoil draws water from the collecting duct and into the tethered-open ascending vasa recta. Thus a periodic hydrostatic gradient generates an axial osmotic gradient. This review recapitulates the video and offers a link to figures and scenes digitized from the original tape.