Effect of Times to Blood Processing on the Stability of Blood Proteins Associated with Dementia

Plasma p-tau181 and amyloid markers in Alzheimer's disease: A comparison between Lumipulse and SIMOA

Aim of the project was to evaluate the technical and clinical validity of plasma Lumipulse p-tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40 species and their correlation with CSF core Alzheimer's Disease (AD) markers; a method comparison with SIMOA was also performed. One-hundred-thirthy-three participants, namely 55 A+T+N+ AD, 28 Neurodegenerative disorders (NDD) and 50 controls were enrolled for the study. Lumipulse technical validity showed high stability for p-tau181, Aβ42, and Aβ40, with higher stability of p-tau to repeated freezing thaw cycles. p-tau181 levels detected by both techniques were higher in AD compared to both NDD/controls and exhibited a similar correlation with CSF p-tau levels, whereas Aβ42 levels were slightly lower in AD with both methods. In the comparison between SIMOA and Lumipulse plasma markers, both techniques exhibited similar diagnostic accuracy for AD for p-tau181 (0.87; 95 %CI 0.81-0.94, vs 0.85; 95 %CI 0.78-0.93), whereas the best performance was reached by p-tau181/ Aβ42 Lumipulse ratio (ROC AUC 0.915, 95 %CI 0.86-0.97). The study thus confirmed the construct validity of both Lumipulse and SIMOA techniques for the identification of CSF AD pattern in clinical settings.

Advances in Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Ultra-Sensitive Detection Technologies and Impact on Clinical Diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease has escalated into a critical public health concern, marked by its neurodegenerative nature that progressively diminishes cognitive abilities. Recognized as a continuously advancing and presently incurable condition, AD underscores the necessity for early-stage diagnosis and interventions aimed at delaying the decline in mental function. Despite the proven efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography in diagnosing AD, their broader utility is constrained by significant costs and the invasive nature of these procedures. Consequently, the innovation of blood biomarkers such as Amyloid-beta, phosphorylated-tau, total-tau et al, distinguished by their high sensitivity, minimal invasiveness, accessibility, and cost-efficiency, emerges as a promising avenue for AD diagnosis. The advent of ultra-sensitive detection methodologies, including single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, has revolutionized the detection of AD plasma biomarkers, supplanting previous low-sensitivity techniques. This rapid advancement in detection technology facilitates the more accurate quantification of pathological brain proteins and AD-associated biomarkers in the bloodstream. This manuscript meticulously reviews the landscape of current research on immunological markers for AD, anchored in the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association AT(N) research framework. It highlights a selection of forefront ultra-sensitive detection technologies now integral to assessing AD blood immunological markers. Additionally, this review examines the crucial pre-analytical processing steps for AD blood samples that significantly impact research outcomes and addresses the practical challenges faced during clinical testing. These discussions are crucial for enhancing our comprehension and refining the diagnostic precision of AD using blood-based biomarkers. The review aims to shed light on potential avenues for innovation and improvement in the techniques employed for detecting and investigating AD, thereby contributing to the broader field of neurodegenerative disease research.

Effects of storage conditions on the stability of blood-based markers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is considered the most common cause of dementia in older people. Recently, blood-based markers (BBM) Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and phospho Tau181 (p-Tau181) have demonstrated the potential to transform the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of AD. Our aim was to investigate the effect of different storage conditions on the quantification of these BBM and to evaluate the interchangeability of plasma and serum samples.

METHODS

Forty-two individuals with some degree of cognitive impairment were studied. Thirty further patients were retrospectively selected. Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and p-Tau181 were quantified using the LUMIPULSE-G600II automated platform. To assess interchangeability between conditions, correction factors for magnitudes that showed strong correlations were calculated, followed by classification consistency studies.

RESULTS

Storing samples at 4 °C for 8-9 days was associated with a decrease in Aβ fractions but not when stored for 1-2 days. Using the ratio partially attenuated the pre-analytical effects. For p-Tau181, samples stored at 4 °C presented lower concentrations, whereas frozen samples presented higher ones. Concerning classification consistency in comparisons that revealed strong correlations (p-Tau181), the percentage of total agreement was greater than 90 % in a large number of the tested cut-offs values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide relevant information for the standardization of sample collection and storage in the analysis of AD BBM in an automated platform. This knowledge is crucial to ensure their introduction into clinical settings.

Pre-Analytical Variables Influencing Stability of Blood-Based Biomarkers of Neuropathology

BACKGROUND

Sample collection and preanalytical protocols may significantly impact the results of large-scale epidemiological studies incorporating blood-based biomarkers of neuropathology.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the stability and assay variability of several blood-based biomarkers of neuropathology for common preanalytical conditions.

METHODS

We collected serum and plasma samples from 41 participants and evaluated the effect of processing delay of up to 72 h when stored at 4∘C, three freeze-thaw cycles, and a combination of 48-h processing delay when stored at 4∘C and three freeze-thaw cycles on biomarker stability. Using the Simoa assay (Quanterix Inc.), we measured amyloid-β 40 (Aβ40), amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42), neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau-181).

RESULTS

We found that Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels significantly decreased after a 24-h processing delay in both plasma and serum samples, and a single freeze-thaw cycle (p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, serum Aβ42/40 ratio remained stable with a processing delay up to 48 h while plasma Aβ42/40 ratio showed only small but significant increase with a delay up to 72 h. Both plasma and serum GFAP and NfL levels were only modestly affected by processing delay and freeze-thaw cycles. Plasma p-tau-181 levels notably increased with a 24-, 48-, and 72-h processing delay, but remained stable in serum. Intra-individual variation over two weeks was minimal for all biomarkers and their levels were substantially lower in serum when compared with plasma.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that standardizing preanalytical variables will allow robust measurements of biomarkers of neuropathology in population studies.

Assessment of High Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Using Plasma Biomarkers in Subjects with Normal Cognition in Taiwan: A Preliminary Study

Background

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), cognitive impairment begins 10-15 years later than neurodegeneration in the brain. Plasma biomarkers are promising candidates for assessing neurodegeneration in people with normal cognition. It has been reported that subjects with the concentration of plasma amyloid-β 1-42×total tau protein higher than 455 pg²/ml² are assessed as having a high risk of amnesic mild impairment or AD, denoted as high risk of AD (HRAD).

Objective

The prevalence of high-risk for dementia in cognitively normal controls is explored by assaying plasma biomarkers.

Methods

422 subjects with normal cognition were enrolled around Taiwan. Plasma Aβ_1-40, Aβ_1-42, and T-Tau levels were assayed using immunomagnetic reduction to assess the risk of dementia.

Results

The results showed that 4.6% of young adults (age: 20-44 years), 8.5% of middle-aged adults (age: 45-64 years), and 7.3% of elderly adults (age: 65-90 years) had HRAD. The percentage of individuals with HRAD dramatically increased in middle-aged and elderly adults compared to young adults.

Conclusion

The percentage of HRAD in cognitively normal subjects are approximately 10%, which reveals that the potentially public-health problem of AD in normal population. Although the subject having abnormal levels of Aβ or tau is not definitely going on to develop cognitive declines or AD, the risk of suffering cognitive impairment in future is relatively high. Suitable managements are suggested for these high-risk cognitively normal population. Worth noting, attention should be paid to preventing cognitive impairment due to AD, not only in elderly adults but also middle-aged adults.

Characterization of pre-analytical sample handling effects on a panel of Alzheimer's disease-related blood-based biomarkers: Results from the Standardization of Alzheimer's Blood Biomarkers (SABB) working group

Introduction

Pre‐analytical sample handling might affect the results of Alzheimer's disease blood‐based biomarkers. We empirically tested variations of common blood collection and handling procedures.

Methods

We created sample sets that address the effect of blood collection tube type, and of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid plasma delayed centrifugation, centrifugation temperature, aliquot volume, delayed storage, and freeze–thawing. We measured amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and 40 peptides with six assays, and Aβ oligomerization‐tendency (OAβ), amyloid precursor protein (APP)_699‐711, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL), total tau (t‐tau), and phosphorylated tau181.

Results

Collection tube type resulted in different values of all assessed markers. Delayed plasma centrifugation and storage affected Aβ and t‐tau; t‐tau was additionally affected by centrifugation temperature. The other markers were resistant to handling variations.

Discussion

We constructed a standardized operating procedure for plasma handling, to facilitate introduction of blood‐based biomarkers into the research and clinical settings.