1
|
Watanabe S, Sawano T, Saito H, Ozaki A, Wakui M, Zhao T, Yamamoto C, Kobashi Y, Kawamura T, Sugiyama A, Nakayama A, Kaneko Y, Shimmura H, Tsubokura M. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers after the fourth dose of BNT162b2 vaccine among Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis: a single-center study. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1412918. [PMID: 39238641 PMCID: PMC11375752 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1412918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients undergoing hemodialysis are particularly vulnerable to severe outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with mortality rates higher than that of the general population. Vaccination reduces the risk of adverse outcomes, with booster doses being particularly beneficial. However, limited data are available on the effectiveness of subsequent vaccinations or their effect on increasing antibody levels. This single-center study aimed to investigate changes in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers following the fourth vaccination among 28 patients undergoing hemodialysis. Blood tests were conducted at various intervals post-vaccination, with a focus on identifying factors associated with antibody levels. The IgG antibody levels rapidly increased by Day 7 post-vaccination, with a median time to peak of 11 days. Antibody titers tended to be higher in male patients than in female patients. This study sheds light on the immune response to the fourth vaccination in patients undergoing hemodialysis. As this study included a small sample size, with a short observation period, further research is warranted to comprehensively understand the effectiveness of vaccination and the benefits of additional doses of vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Watanabe
- Department of Urology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Toyoaki Sawano
- Department of Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Saito
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Akihiko Ozaki
- Breast and Thyroid Center, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Wakui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tianchen Zhao
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Chika Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yurie Kobashi
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seireikai Group Hirata Central Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kawamura
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Laboratory for Systems Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Sugiyama
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aya Nakayama
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yudai Kaneko
- Laboratory for Systems Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Medical and Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Shimmura
- Department of Urology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masaharu Tsubokura
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortiz-de-Lejarazu R, Quiroga Gili B, López García A. Burden of COVID-19 variant omicron in immunocompromised patients in Spain: systematic review. Med Clin (Barc) 2024:S0025-7753(24)00299-9. [PMID: 38944615 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
After the COVID-19 pandemic, the omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus became the dominant lineage in Spain in 2022. Although it possesses a milder pathogenicity than previous variants, it still poses a high risk of causing severe COVID-19 for immunocompromised populations. A systematic review was conducted to assess the burden of COVID-19 in Spain among immunocompromised patients during the omicron predominance (1/04/2022-1/04/2023), using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EPICOVIDEHA between May and July 2023. The search retrieved 217 articles, of which a total of 5 were included. Upon analysis, it was observed that immunocompromised patients during the omicron lineage predominance continue to exhibit higher rates of hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and mortality compared to the general population affected by COVID-19. Although the pandemic has ended, the risk persists for immunocompromised individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl Ortiz-de-Lejarazu
- Centro Nacional de Gripe, Hospital Clínico Universitario y Facultad de Medicina de Valladolid, Valladolid, España.
| | - Borja Quiroga Gili
- IIS-La Princesa, Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hirai K, Shimotashiro M, Okumura T, Ookawara S, Morishita Y. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibody Response to the Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Associated Factors in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2024; 17:135-149. [PMID: 38774113 PMCID: PMC11108064 DOI: 10.2147/ijnrd.s452964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody response to four doses of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Japanese hemodialysis patients and determined factors associated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer after the fourth dose. Methods Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this single-center, prospective, longitudinal study. Change in anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers between after the second and fourth doses were evaluated. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer after the fourth dose. Results The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer was higher 4 weeks after the fourth dose compared with 4 weeks after the third dose (30,000 [interquartile range (IQR), 14,000-56,000] vs 18,000 [IQR, 11,000-32,500] AU/mL, p<0.001) and 4 weeks after the second dose (vs 2896 [IQR, 1110-4358] AU/mL, p<0.001). Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor use (standard coefficient [β]=0.217, p=0.011), and the log-anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer 1 week before the fourth dose (β=0.810, p<0.001) were correlated with the log-anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer 4 weeks after the fourth dose, whereas only the log-anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer 1 week before the fourth dose (β=0.677, p<0.001) was correlated with the log-anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer 12 weeks after the fourth dose. Conclusion Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor use and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer before the fourth dose were associated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titer after the fourth dose in Japanese hemodialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiji Hirai
- Division of Nephrology, First Department of Integrated Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | | | | | - Susumu Ookawara
- Division of Nephrology, First Department of Integrated Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Morishita
- Division of Nephrology, First Department of Integrated Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dalinkeviciene E, Gradauskiene B, Sakalauskaite S, Petruliene K, Vaiciuniene R, Skarupskiene I, Bastyte D, Sauseriene J, Valius L, Bumblyte IA, Ziginskiene E. Immune Response after Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Relation to Cellular Immunity, Vitamin D and Comorbidities in Hemodialysis Patients. Microorganisms 2024; 12:861. [PMID: 38792691 PMCID: PMC11123711 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12050861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
In the global threat of SARS-CoV-2, individuals undergoing maintenance dialysis represent a vulnerable population with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Therefore, immunization against SARS-CoV-2 is an essential component of healthcare strategy for these patients. Existing data indicate that they tend to exhibit a reduced immune response to vaccines compared to the general population. Our study aimed to assess both humoral and cellular immune responses following two doses of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, an ability to maintain adequate antibody titers over time, and potential relations with vitamin D, comorbidities and other factors in hemodialysis patients based on a single center experience. A total of 41/45 patients (91.1%) responded to the second dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG class antibodies and levels of T cells three to four weeks after vaccination were lower in dialysis patients than in healthy controls. Antibodies titer in dialysis patients had a positive correlation with B lymphocytes and was related to cardiovascular diseases. The level of CD4+ cells had a negative correlation with hemodialysis vintage, as did the vitamin D level with post-vaccination seroconversion and decline in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies titer during six months after vaccination. Hemodialysis patients had decreased amounts of CD4+ and CD8+ cells and lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies than healthy controls. Therefore, chronic hemodialysis could lead to diminished cellular immunity and humoral immune response to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and reduced protection from COVID-19. Comorbidity in cardiovascular diseases was associated with a lower level of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer. Vitamin D may be important in maintaining stable levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while the duration of dialysis treatment could be one of the factors decreasing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer and determining lower CD4+ cell counts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egle Dalinkeviciene
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| | - Brigita Gradauskiene
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| | - Sandra Sakalauskaite
- Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology and Allergology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (S.S.); (D.B.)
| | - Kristina Petruliene
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| | - Ruta Vaiciuniene
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| | - Inga Skarupskiene
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| | - Daina Bastyte
- Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Immunology and Allergology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (S.S.); (D.B.)
| | - Jolanta Sauseriene
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (J.S.); (L.V.)
| | - Leonas Valius
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (J.S.); (L.V.)
| | - Inga Arune Bumblyte
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| | - Edita Ziginskiene
- Department of Nephrology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (K.P.); (R.V.); (I.S.); (I.A.B.); (E.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chenchula S, Chandra MB, Adusumilli MB, Ghanta SN, Bommasani A, Kuttiappan A, Padmavathi R, Amerneni KC, Chikatipalli R, Ghanta MK, Reddy SS, Mythili Bai K, Prakash S, Jogender G, Chavan M, Balakrishnan S. Immunogenicity, clinical efficacy and safety of additional second COVID-19 booster vaccines against Omicron and its subvariants: A systematic review. Rev Med Virol 2024; 34:e2515. [PMID: 38282403 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a new variant of concern (VOC) and an emerging subvariant that exhibits heightened infectivity, transmissibility, and immune evasion, escalating the incidence of moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It resists monoclonal antibodies and diminishes vaccine efficacy. Notably, new sublineages have outpaced earlier predominant sublineages. Although the primary vaccination series and initial boosters were robust against previous VOCs, their efficacy waned against Omicron and its subvariants. In this systematic review, we assessed real-world evidence on the immunogenicity, clinical efficacy, and safety of a second booster or fourth COVID-19 vaccine dose against the Omicron VOC and its subvariants. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, and relevant studies published between 2022 and 30 May 2023 were reviewed. We found a total of 40 relevant articles focusing on a second booster dose for COVID-19, including clinical trials and observational studies, involving 3,972,856 patients. The results consistently revealed that an additional second booster dose restored and prolonged waning immunity, activating both humoral and cellular responses against Omicron and its subvariants. A second booster treatment correlated with enduring protection against COVID-19, notably preventing substantial symptomatic disease and mortality associated with severe Omicron infection. Both monovalent messenger RNA (mRNA) and nonmRNA vaccines demonstrated similar efficacy and safety, with bivalent mRNA vaccines exhibiting broader protection against emerging subvariants of Omicron. The safety profiles of second booster were favourable with only mild systemic and local symptoms reported in some recipients. In conclusion, this systematic review underscores the additional COVID-19 vaccine boosters, particularly with bivalent or multivalent mRNA vaccines, for countering the highly infectious emerging subvariants of Omicron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Anitha Kuttiappan
- School of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SVKM'S NMIMS, Shirpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - R Padmavathi
- SVS Medical College and Hospital, Mahbubnagar, Telangana, India
| | | | | | | | | | - K Mythili Bai
- Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Satya Prakash
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - G Jogender
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Madhavrao Chavan
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - S Balakrishnan
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hsu CM, Weiner DE, Manley HJ, Li NC, Miskulin D, Harford A, Sanders R, Ladik V, Frament J, Argyropoulos C, Abreo K, Chin A, Gladish R, Salman L, Johnson D, Lacson EK. Serial SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers in Vaccinated Dialysis Patients: Prevalence of Unrecognized Infection and Duration of Seroresponse. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100718. [PMID: 37786901 PMCID: PMC10542005 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections are likely underdiagnosed, but the degree of underdiagnosis among patients receiving maintenance dialysis is unknown. The durability of the immune response after the third vaccine dose in this population also remains uncertain. This descriptive study tracked antibody levels to (1) assess the rate of undiagnosed infections and (2) characterize seroresponse durability after the third dose. Study Design Retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated patients receiving maintenance dialysis through a national dialysis provider. Immunoglobulin G spike antibodies [anti-spike immunoglobulin (Ig) G] titers were assessed monthly after vaccination. Exposures Two and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Outcomes Undiagnosed and diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections; anti-spike IgG titers over time. Analytical Approach Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified as an increase in anti-spike IgG titer of ≥100 BAU/mL, not associated with receipt of vaccine or diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection (by polymerase chain reaction test or antigen test). In descriptive analyses, anti-spike IgG titers were followed over time. Results Among 2,703 patients without previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received an initial 2-dose vaccine series, 271 had diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.4 per 10,000 patient-days) and 129 had undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (1.6 per 10,000 patient-days). Among 1,894 patients without previous COVID-19 who received a third vaccine dose, 316 had diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (7.0 per 10,000 patient-days) and 173 had undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.8 per 10,000 patient-days). In both cohorts, anti-spike IgG levels declined over time. Of the initial 2-dose cohort, 66% had a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL in the first month, with 24% maintaining a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL at 6 months. Of the third dose cohort, 95% had a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL in the first month after the third dose, with 77% maintaining a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL at 6 months. Limitations The assays used had upper limits. Conclusions Among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, about 1 in every 3 SARS-CoV-2 infections was undiagnosed. Given this population's vulnerability to COVID-19, ongoing infection control measures are needed. A 3-dose primary mRNA vaccine series optimizes seroresponse rate and durability. Plain-Language Summary Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have been particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. Using serially measured antibodies, we found that a substantial proportion (about one-third) of SARS-CoV-2 infections among this population had been missed, both among those who had completed a 2-dose vaccine series and among those who had received a third vaccine dose. Such missed infections likely had only mild or minimal symptoms, but this failure to recognize all infections is concerning. Furthermore, vaccines have been effective among patients receiving dialysis, but our study additionally shows that the immune response wanes over time, even after a third dose. There is therefore a role for ongoing vigilance against this highly transmissible infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Dana Miskulin
- Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Antonia Harford
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Abreo
- Division of Nephrology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Andrew Chin
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Loay Salman
- Division of Nephrology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
| | | | - Eduardo K. Lacson
- Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Dialysis Clinic Inc, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, de Sequera P. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2023; 43:676-687. [PMID: 37150670 PMCID: PMC10160849 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain.
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joo Y, Kim DK, Jeon YG, Kim AR, Do HN, Yoon SY, Kim JS, Jung SW, Hwang HS, Moon JY, Jeong KH, Lee SH, Kang SY, Kim YG. Comparison of Humoral Response between Third and Fourth Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1584. [PMID: 37896987 PMCID: PMC10610999 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11101584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Dialysis patients are more likely to die or become hospitalized from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Currently, only a few studies have evaluated the efficacy of a fourth booster vaccination in hemodialysis (HD) patients and there is not enough evidence to recommend for or against a fourth booster vaccination. This study compared the humoral response and disease severity of patients on HD who received either three or four doses of COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 88 patients were enrolled. Humoral response to vaccination was measured by quantifying immunoglobulin G levels against the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD IgG) at five different times and plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) at two different times after vaccination over a period of 18 months. Antibody levels were measured at approximately two-month intervals after the first and second dose, then four months after the third dose, and then one to six months after the fourth dose of vaccine. PRNT was performed two months after the second and four months after the third dose of vaccine. We classified patients into four groups according to the number of vaccine doses and presence of COVID-19 infection. Severe infection was defined as hospital admission for greater than or equal to two weeks or death. There was no difference in antibody levels between naïve and infected patients except after a fourth vaccination, which was effective for increasing antibodies in infection-naïve patients. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), dialysis vintage, and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) did not show a significant correlation with antibody levels. Four patients who experienced severe COVID-19 disease tended to have lower antibody levels prior to infection. A fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine significantly elevated antibodies in infection-naïve HD patients and may be beneficial for HD patients who have not been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 for protection against severe infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoosun Joo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea; (Y.J.); (S.W.J.); (J.-Y.M.); (S.-H.L.)
| | - Dae Kyu Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; (D.K.K.); (S.-Y.Y.); (J.S.K.); (H.S.H.); (K.H.J.)
| | - Yun Gi Jeon
- Honorshill Hospital, Gimpo-si 10035, Republic of Korea;
| | - Ah-Ra Kim
- Division of Vaccine Clinical Research Center for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju 34142, Republic of Korea; (A.-R.K.); (H.N.D.)
| | - Hyeon Nam Do
- Division of Vaccine Clinical Research Center for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju 34142, Republic of Korea; (A.-R.K.); (H.N.D.)
| | - Soo-Young Yoon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; (D.K.K.); (S.-Y.Y.); (J.S.K.); (H.S.H.); (K.H.J.)
| | - Jin Sug Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; (D.K.K.); (S.-Y.Y.); (J.S.K.); (H.S.H.); (K.H.J.)
| | - Su Woong Jung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea; (Y.J.); (S.W.J.); (J.-Y.M.); (S.-H.L.)
| | - Hyeon Seok Hwang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; (D.K.K.); (S.-Y.Y.); (J.S.K.); (H.S.H.); (K.H.J.)
| | - Ju-Young Moon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea; (Y.J.); (S.W.J.); (J.-Y.M.); (S.-H.L.)
| | - Kyung Hwang Jeong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; (D.K.K.); (S.-Y.Y.); (J.S.K.); (H.S.H.); (K.H.J.)
| | - Sang-Ho Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea; (Y.J.); (S.W.J.); (J.-Y.M.); (S.-H.L.)
| | - So-Young Kang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea;
| | - Yang Gyun Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea; (Y.J.); (S.W.J.); (J.-Y.M.); (S.-H.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cohen-Hagai K, Hornik-Lurie T, Benchetrit S, Nacasch N, Grupper A, Einbinder Y, Wand O, Shashar M. Clinical efficacy of the fourth dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in maintenance dialysis patients. J Nephrol 2023; 36:1957-1964. [PMID: 37326951 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01667-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Highly effective vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 have been developed and administered worldwide. However, protection from coronavirus disease 2019 is not absolute and an optimal vaccination regimen needs to be established. This study assessed the clinical efficacy of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine among dialysis patients receiving 3 or 4 doses of vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS This retrospective study was conducted using the electronic database of Clalit Health Maintenance Organization in Israel. Chronic dialysis patients treated with either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic were included. We compared clinical outcomes of patients who had received three or four doses of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 vaccine. RESULTS This study included 1,030 patients on chronic dialysis, with a mean age of 68 ± 13 years. Among them, 502 patients had received 3 doses of the vaccine and 528 received 4 doses. Severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 infection rates, severe COVID-19 that resulted in hospitalizations, COVID-19-related mortality and all-cause mortality rates were lower among chronic dialysis patients who received a fourth dose of vaccine as compared to those who received only 3 doses (after controlling for age, sex and comorbidities). Despite lower mortality rates observed with the Omicron variant, the fourth dose was significantly associated with reduced COVID-19-related mortality (1.7% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.04). Odds ratio for COVID-19-related mortality was 0.44 with 95% CI 0.2-0.98. CONCLUSIONS As seen in the general population and with previous vaccine boosters, the fourth dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine reduced rates of severe COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality among chronic dialysis patients. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal regimens of vaccination for patients on chronic dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Cohen-Hagai
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Sydney Benchetrit
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Naomi Nacasch
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ayelet Grupper
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Einbinder
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ori Wand
- Department of Pulmonology, Barzilai University Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Moshe Shashar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel.
- Renal Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beilhack G, Monteforte R, Frommlet F, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Strassl R, Vychytil A. Durable Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response after mRNA-1273 Booster in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients during the Omicron Wave. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1121. [PMID: 37376510 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of dialysis patients has been proven to be safe and effective to reduce COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. However, data on the durability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies post-vaccination in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are scarce. In this prospective single-center cohort study we measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies 3 and 6 months after the 3rd dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in 27 adult PD patients and recorded breakthrough infections. Furthermore, in a mixed model analysis, we analyzed potential factors influencing the humoral response following vaccination. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody levels declined from 21,424 BAU/mL at 1 month to 8397 BAU/mL at 3 months and to 5120 BAU/mL at 6 months after the 3rd dose, but remained higher than pre-3rd dose levels (212 BAU/mL). Eight patients (29.6%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 within six months from the 3rd dose during the Omicron wave. Previous high antibody levels, high glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and low Davies Comorbidity Score were associated with higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels after the booster. In conclusion, PD patients exhibited a robust and durable humoral response after a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. A high GFR and low comorbidity as well as previous high antibody levels predicted a better humoral response to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Beilhack
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Rossella Monteforte
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Frommlet
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Strassl
- Division of Clinical Virology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Vychytil
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Premuzic V, Stevanovic R, Vilibic-Cavlek T, Sirovica M, Stalman S, Bogdanic M, Zilic D, Nakic D, Santini Dusevic D, Vojkovic M, Barbic J, Durlen I, Grdan Z, Pavlovic D, Kudumija B, Sefer S, Griparic D, Rogic D, Bubas M, Capak K, Jelakovic B. Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Hemodialyzed Patients and the Association with Later COVID-19 Positivity. Antibodies (Basel) 2023; 12:37. [PMID: 37366653 DOI: 10.3390/antib12020037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine may differ in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to determine the degree of serological response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the population of dialysis patients and its association with later SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS A blood sample was taken for the determination of COVID-19 serological status (IgG antibodies) in 706 dialysis patients 16 weeks after vaccination with the second dose (Pfizer-BioNTech). RESULTS Only 314 (44.5%) hemodialyzed patients had a satisfactory response to the COVID-19 vaccine. Eighty-two patients (11.6%) had a borderline response, while 310 patients (43.9%) had an unsatisfactory (negative) post-vaccinal antibody titer. A longer dialysis vintage had an increased odds ratio (OR) of 1.01 for the occurrence of COVID-19 positivity after vaccination. In the group of subsequently positive patients, 28 patients (13.6%) died from complications of COVID-19. We have found differences in mean survival time between patients with and without appropriate responses to vaccination in favor of patients with a satisfactory serological response. CONCLUSIONS The results showed that the dialysis population will not have the same serological response to the vaccine as the general population. The majority of dialysis patients did not develop a severe clinical picture or die at the time of positivity for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedran Premuzic
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- Croatian Institute of Public Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Maja Sirovica
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sara Stalman
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Maja Bogdanic
- Croatian Institute of Public Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Dario Nakic
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
| | | | - Marina Vojkovic
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
| | - Jerko Barbic
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Ivan Durlen
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Hospital Dubrava, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Zeljka Grdan
- Department of Nephrology, Clinical Hospital Varazdin, 42000 Varazdin, Croatia
| | - Drasko Pavlovic
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- Policlinic for Internal Medicine and Dialysis B. Braun Avitum, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Boris Kudumija
- Policlinic for Internal Medicine and Dialysis B. Braun Avitum, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sinisa Sefer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Clinical Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice", 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Davor Griparic
- Policlinic for Dialysis Fresenius Sveti Duh 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Dunja Rogic
- Clinical Institute for Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Bubas
- Croatian Institute of Public Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Bojan Jelakovic
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hsu CM, Weiner DE, Manley HJ, Miskulin D, Ladik V, Frament J, Argyropoulos C, Abreo K, Chin A, Gladish R, Salman L, Johnson D, Lacson EK. Serial SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in vaccinated dialysis patients: prevalence of unrecognized infection and duration of seroresponse. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.16.23287322. [PMID: 36993760 PMCID: PMC10055593 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.16.23287322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Rationale & Objective SARS-CoV-2 infections are likely underdiagnosed, but the degree of underdiagnosis among maintenance dialysis patients is unknown. Durability of the immune response after third vaccine doses in this population also remains uncertain. This study tracked antibody levels to 1) assess the rate of undiagnosed infections and 2) characterize seroresponse durability after third doses. Study Design Retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated patients receiving maintenance dialysis through a national dialysis provider. Immunoglobulin G spike antibodies (anti-spike IgG) titers were assessed monthly following vaccination. Exposures Two and three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Outcomes Undiagnosed and diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections; anti-spike IgG titers over time. Analytical Approach "Undiagnosed" SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified as an increase in anti-spike IgG titer of ≥ 100 BAU/mL, not associated with receipt of vaccine or "diagnosed" SARS-CoV-2 infection (by PCR or antigen test). In descriptive analyses, anti-spike IgG titers were followed over time. Results Among 2660 patients without prior COVID-19 who received an initial two-dose vaccine series, 371 (76%) SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed and 115 (24%) were undiagnosed. Among 1717 patients without prior COVID-19 who received a third vaccine dose, 155 (80%) SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed and 39 (20%) were undiagnosed. In both cohorts, anti-spike IgG levels declined over time. Of the initial two-dose cohort, 66% had a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL in the first month, with 23% maintaining a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL at six months. Of the third dose cohort, 95% had a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL in the first month after the third dose, with 76% maintaining a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL at six months. Limitations Assays used had upper limits. Conclusions Among maintenance dialysis patients, 20-24% of SARS-CoV-2 infections were undiagnosed. Given this population's vulnerability to COVID-19, ongoing infection control measures are needed. A three-dose primary mRNA vaccine series optimizes seroresponse rate and durability.
Collapse
|
13
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Sequera PD. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2022; 43:S0211-6995(22)00201-6. [PMID: 36540904 PMCID: PMC9756643 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang X, Zhang H, Bao W, Fu S, Jin H. Immunogenicity Rates after SARS-CoV-2 Three-Dose Vaccination in Patients under Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10122070. [PMID: 36560480 PMCID: PMC9782384 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the indeterminate effects following the administration of three doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to patients under dialysis, the present study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity rates of patients who received the three-dose vaccine. METHODS MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched to select the relevant literature to perform the present review. We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case-control studies to assess the humoral and cellular immune responses following the administration of the three-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to patients receiving dialysis. RESULTS Overall, 38 studies are included in the meta-analysis presented in this paper. For patients on dialysis, the overall humoral antibody response rate is 97% following three doses of mRNA or viral vector vaccines and 100% following four doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A subgroup analysis shows that the antibody response rate is 96% for patients on hemodialysis (HD) and 100% for those receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). The antibody response rate in the different immunogen-vaccinated groups tends to be higher than that in the same immunogen-vaccinated group (99% vs. 96%). For those who exhibit no response following two doses of the vaccine, the third and fourth doses can elevate the antibody response rate to 81%, and that number for low responders increases to 96%. However, the pooled results obtained from the relatively few trials conducted indicate that the positive T-cell response rate only increases to 59% following three doses of the vaccine. The antibody response rate is not different between dialysis and non-dialysis groups (relative risk = 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.02) following three doses of the vaccine. The relative risks for a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection, all-cause mortality, and hospital admissions are 0.59 (95% CI 0.30-1.04), 0.63 (95% CI 0.35-1.12), and 0.53 (95% CI 0.37-0.74), respectively, when comparing three doses with two doses of the vaccine administered to the dialysis population. CONCLUSIONS The third or fourth dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine significantly increases the immunogenicity rates in dialysis patients, and this beneficial effect does not vary with the type of vaccine (the same or different immunogen vaccination), dialysis modality (HD or PD), or previous low response following the administration two doses of the vaccine. We believe that healthcare workers should encourage patients receiving dialysis to receive a third or fourth vaccine dose to strengthen their immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
|
15
|
Affeldt P, Koehler FC, Brensing KA, Gies M, Platen E, Adam V, Butt L, Grundmann F, Heger E, Hinrichs S, Kalisch N, Oehm S, Steger G, Wirtz M, Benzing T, Stippel D, Klein F, Kurschat C, Müller RU, Di Cristanziano V. Immune Response to Third and Fourth COVID-19 Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Viruses 2022; 14:v14122646. [PMID: 36560648 PMCID: PMC9785871 DOI: 10.3390/v14122646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a serious hazard for hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplant (KTX) recipients as they suffer from an impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In addition, a definition of SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer that indicates a sufficient immune response, especially against new omicron variants, is urgently needed. In the present study, the immune response to either a third or a fourth dose of a mRNA vaccine was investigated in 309 dialysis and 36 KTX patients. SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer thresholds indicating neutralizing activity against wild type (WT) and the omicron variant BA.1 were quantified. After four vaccine doses, a high-neutralizing activity against WT was evidenced in HD patients, whereas the neutralizing rate against BA.1 was significant lower. Concerning KTX recipients, humoral and cellular immune responses after a third vaccination were still highly impaired. This calls for modified omicron-targeting vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Affeldt
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix Carlo Koehler
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Martin Gies
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Köln-Longerich, 50737 Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva Platen
- Nierenzentrum Eifel, 53894 Mechernich, Germany
| | - Vivien Adam
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Linus Butt
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Franziska Grundmann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Steffen Hinrichs
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nils Kalisch
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simon Oehm
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Gertrud Steger
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maike Wirtz
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Benzing
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman-Ulrich Müller
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- CECAD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence: (R.-U.M.); (V.D.C.); Tel.: +49-221-478-30966 (R.-U.M.); +49-221-478-85828 (V.D.C.)
| | - Veronica Di Cristanziano
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence: (R.-U.M.); (V.D.C.); Tel.: +49-221-478-30966 (R.-U.M.); +49-221-478-85828 (V.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Long-Term Dynamic Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10101738. [PMID: 36298603 PMCID: PMC9609237 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) present an impaired humoral response against SARS-CoV-2, at least after the initial vaccination and booster dose. Until now, the effect of a fourth dose has not been established. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the long-term dynamics of the humoral response of PD patients to multiple doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, focusing on the effect of the fourth dose. Methods. This is an analysis of the prospective and multicentric SENCOVAC study. We included patients on PD without additional immunosuppression that had received at least 3 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine doses. We evaluated anti-spike antibody titers after the initial vaccination, third and fourth doses, using prespecified fixed assessments (i.e., baseline, 28 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after completing the initial vaccine schedule). Breakthrough infections were also collected. Results. We included 164 patients on PD (69% males, 62 ± 13 years old). In patients who had received only two doses, the rates of positive humoral response progressively decreased from 96% at 28 days to 80% at 6 months, as did with anti-spike antibody titers. At 6 months, 102 (62%) patients had received the third vaccine dose. Patients with the third dose had higher rates of positive humoral response (p = 0.01) and higher anti-spike antibody titers (p < 0.001) at 6 months than those with only 2 doses. At 12 months, the whole cohort had received 3 vaccine doses, and 44 (27%) patients had an additional fourth dose. The fourth dose was not associated to higher rates of positive humoral response (100 vs. 97%, p = 0.466) or to statistically significant differences in anti-spike antibody titers as compared to three doses (p = 0.371) at 12 months. Prior antibody titers were the only predictor for subsequent higher anti-spike antibody titer (B 0.53 [95%CI 0.27−0.78], p < 0.001). The 2 (1.2%) patients that developed COVID-19 during follow-up had mild disease. Conclusions. PD presents an acceptable humoral response with three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that improve the progressive loss of anti-spike antibody titers following two vaccine doses.
Collapse
|