Treatment of 51 pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance

Danaparoid-Consensus Recommendations on Its Clinical Use

(1) Background: Danaparoid sodium is a heparinoid antithrombotic that has been used for over 40 years for prophylaxis of DVT in non-HIT patients and for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with and without thrombosis. This update summarises current information on its pharmacology and reviews danaparoid dose management in a broad spectrum of clinical situations, including off-label indications. (2) Methods: Evidence from published clinical studies, case reports, compassionate use of danaparoid, and spontaneously reported serious adverse events is summarised and analysed by an interdisciplinary expert group to develop a consensus on dosing regimens of danaparoid for complex clinical situations, including vulnerable patient populations. (3) Results: Dosing regimens are proposed, together with monitoring recommendations and target anti-factor Xa ranges. (4) Conclusion: In a comprehensive summary detailed interdisciplinary dosing recommendations are described to provide a basis for safe and effective use of danaparoid.

Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum: an illustrated review

The topic of this review is venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and postpartum. The following topics will be addressed: epidemiology and pathophysiology of VTE in pregnancy and postpartum, diagnostic considerations for VTE in pregnancy, indications for prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in pregnancy and postpartum, choice of anticoagulation in pregnancy and breastfeeding, anticoagulation management during labor and delivery, and anticoagulation considerations for assisted reproductive technology.

Atrial fibrillation during pregnancy: a 9-month period with limited options

Pregnancy is a physiological condition with reversible hemodynamic, neurohormonal and coagulation changes to the maternal body during this 9‑month period. The occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is altogether rare among pregnant women, but necessitates immediate treatment und further work-up. Despite numerous pharmacological and invasive therapeutic modalities for AF in non-pregnant patients, very few options are considered safe enough for the fetus and the mother during pregnancy. Commonly used medications such as beta blockers, calcium channel antagonists, antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulation therapy must be carefully individualized according to the week of gestation and possible underlying comorbidities of the mother, thus highlighting the importance of an interdisciplinary evaluation by a cardiologist and a gynecologist. The current review summarizes the existing knowledge and treatment options for AF in pregnancy and suggests a simplified algorithm for this clinical constellation.

Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy

Even though venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal mortality in high-income countries, there are limited high-quality data to assist clinicians with the management of pulmonary embolism in this patient population. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism are complicated by the need to consider fetal, as well as maternal, well-being. Recent studies suggest that clinical prediction rules and D-dimer testing can reduce the need for diagnostic imaging in a subset of patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the preferred anticoagulant for both prophylaxis and treatment in this setting. Direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated during pregnancy and in breastfeeding women. Thrombolysis or embolectomy should be considered for pregnant women with pulmonary embolism complicated by hemodynamic instability. Treatment of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism should be continued for at least 3 months, including 6 weeks postpartum. Management of anticoagulants at the time of delivery should involve a multidisciplinary individualized approach that uses shared decision making to take patient and caregiver values and preferences into account.

Apixaban therapy in a pregnant woman with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolic events caused by congenital antithrombin deficiency: A case report

We report the case of a 35-year-old pregnant woman (gravida 3, para 1) with antithrombin deficiency who was successfully treated with apixaban. She had a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and venous thromboembolic events. Pregnancy was confirmed while the patient was having anticoagulant therapy for a persistent thrombus. Choice of anticoagulation during her pregnancy was limited because of her antithrombin deficiency: heparin was not an option because of her history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; antithrombin-dependent anticoagulant drugs were not an option because of her antithrombin deficiency, and she preferred outpatient management. Despite the fact that there are no reports of its use in pregnant women, we selected apixaban (10 mg/day), a direct Xa inhibitor, as the best solution. No progression of thrombus was noted during the pregnancy. The newborn baby had no external congenital anomalies, intracranial hemorrhage, or bleeding tendency. Thus, apixaban may be a candidate for anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolic events and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

•

Pregnant women are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism than women who are not pregnant.

•

Anticoagulant therapy is limited for a pregnant woman with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia caused by congenital antithrombin deficiency.

•

Apixaban may be an alternative option of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy.

Prophylaxis and Therapy of Venous Thrombotic Events (VTE) in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

Venous thromboembolisms and pulmonary embolisms are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in pregnancy. The increased risk of thrombotic events caused by the physiological changes during pregnancy alone does not justify any medical antithrombotic prophylaxis. However, if there are also other risk factors such as a history of thromboses, hormonal stimulation as part of fertility treatment, thrombophilia, increased age of the pregnant woman, severe obesity or predisposing concomitant illnesses, the risk of thrombosis should be re-evaluated - if possible by a coagulation specialist - and drug prophylaxis should be initiated, where applicable. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the standard medication for the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombotic events in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Medical thrombosis prophylaxis started during pregnancy is generally continued for about six weeks following delivery due to the risk of thrombosis which peaks during the postpartum period. The same applies to therapeutic anticoagulation after the occurrence of a thrombotic event in pregnancy; here, a minimum duration of the therapy of three months should also be adhered to. During breastfeeding, LMWH or the oral anticoagulant warfarin can be considered; neither active substance passes into breast milk.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates ∼1.2 of every 1000 deliveries. Despite these low absolute risks, pregnancy-associated VTE is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians and others in decisions about the prevention and management of pregnancy-associated VTE.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 31 recommendations related to the treatment of VTE and superficial vein thrombosis, diagnosis of VTE, and thrombosis prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong recommendation for low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) over unfractionated heparin for acute VTE. Most recommendations were conditional, including those for either twice-per-day or once-per-day LMWH dosing for the treatment of acute VTE and initial outpatient therapy over hospital admission with low-risk acute VTE, as well as against routine anti-factor Xa (FXa) monitoring to guide dosing with LMWH for VTE treatment. There was a strong recommendation (low certainty in evidence) for antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis with a history of unprovoked or hormonally associated VTE and a conditional recommendation against antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis with prior VTE associated with a resolved nonhormonal provoking risk factor.

Enoxaparin Use in Pregnancy: State of the Art

Low-molecular-weight heparin is the anticoagulant of choice in pregnancy. Enoxaparin has been increasingly used over the past 20 years in pregnant women at risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications. The main indications are prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and prevention of pregnancy loss in thrombophilic women. Other indications include treatment of venous thromboembolism, prophylaxis of arterial thrombosis in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves and prevention of late gestational complication such as pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Enoxaparin does not cross the placenta and is safe for the fetus. Maternal side effects are uncommon and include mild localized allergic reactions in 2% and increased bleeding in 2%, which is dose dependent. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is very rare and bone resorption is not clinically relevant. The mechanisms of action of enoxaparin in pregnancy are multiple and include anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity in maternal circulation, tissue factor pathway inhibitor release from endothelial cells and trophoblasts at the placental level as well as anti-inflammatory effects.

Guidance for the treatment and prevention of obstetric-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which may manifest as pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Treatment and prevention of obstetric-related VTE is complicated by the need to consider fetal, as well as maternal, wellbeing when making management decisions. Although absolute VTE rates in this population are low, obstetric-associated VTE is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides practical clinical guidance on the prevention and treatment of obstetric-associated VTE based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion based on available literature where guidelines are lacking.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill: Diagnostic dilemmas and management conundrums

Thrombocytopenia is often noted in critically ill patients. While there are many reasons for thrombocytopenia, the use of heparin and its derivatives is increasingly noted to be associated with thrombocytopenia. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia syndrome (HITS) is a distinct entity that is characterised by the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in conjunction with thrombotic manifestations after exposure to unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. HITS is an immunologic disorder mediated by antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. HITS is an uncommon cause of thrombocytopenia. Reported incidence of HITS in patients exposed to heparin varies from 0.2% to up to 5%. HITS is rare in ICU populations, with estimates varying from 0.39%-0.48%. It is a complex problem which may cause diagnostic dilemmas and management conundrum. The diagnosis of HITS centers around detection of antibodies against PF4-heparin complexes. Immunoassays performed by most pathology laboratories detect the presence of antibodies, but do not reveal whether the antibodies are pathological. Platelet activation assays demonstrate the presence of clinically relevant antibodies, but only a minority of laboratories conduct them. Several anticoagulants are used in management of HITS. In this review we discuss the incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of HITS.

A systematic review on the use of new anticoagulants in pregnancy

New anticoagulants such as direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors have been recently developed, but their experience in pregnancy is limited. This review therefore aims to systematically search for studies on the use of these newer anticoagulants in pregnancy and the puerperal period. Searches were performed on electronic databases MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1974) and the Cochrane Library, until October 2011 using terms of 'pregnancy', 'puerperium', 'breastfeeding' and names of specific anticoagulants. The search yielded 561 citations and 11 studies (10 on fondaparinux, 1 on ximelagatran) were included. Newer anticoagulants (fondaparinux, hirudin and argatroban) on the limited evidence appear not to have adverse pregnancy outcomes, but there is currently no experience of new oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, betrixaban or dabigatran) use in pregnancy. There is a need for reporting on new oral anticoagulation use in pregnancy to provide more information about the safety and risks to the fetus in utero.

Delayed-type heparin allergy: diagnostic procedures and treatment alternatives-a case series including 15 patients

Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions (DTHRs) after subcutaneous application of unfractionated heparins or low-molecular-weight heparins are not uncommon. Standard allergological testing usually includes intracutaneous skin tests and patch testing of different heparins, heparinoids, and thrombin inhibitors followed by subcutaneous and/or intravenous challenge with skin test-negative drugs. We present data from a single-center case series of 15 patients with DTHR after low-molecular-weight heparin administration. Intracutaneous testing that can be considered as gold standard identified the suspicious elicitor in 11 (73.4%) of 15 of the patients. Patch testing was positive in 5 (33.4%) of 15 of the patients and was only positive in patients who were also reacting in the intradermal testing. Intravenous challenge with heparin sodium was performed in 10 of 15 patients and was well tolerated in all cases, despite prior positive intracutaneous tests with the same substance. Intracutaneous documentation of DTHR was not an adequate predictor of intravenous challenge.

Venous thromboembolism associated with pregnancy and hormonal therapy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during or early after pregnancy and in women taking hormonal therapy for contraception or for replacement therapy. Post-thrombotic syndrome, including leg oedema and leg pain, is an unrecognized burden after pregnancy-related VTE, which will affect more than two of five women. Women with a prior VTE, a family history of VTE, certain clinical risk factors and thrombophilia are at considerably increased risk both for pregnancy-related VTE and for VTE on hormonal therapy. This review critically assesses the epidemiology and risk factors for pregnancy-related VTE and current guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment. We also provide information on the risk of VTE related to hormonal contraception and replacement therapy.

Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but severe prothrombotic adverse effect of heparin treatment. The underlying cause is the formation of highly immunogenic complexes between negatively charged heparin and positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). Resulting antibodies against these PF4/heparin complexes can activate platelets via the platelet FcγIIa receptor, leading to thrombin generation and thus to the paradox of a prothrombotic state despite thrombocytopenia and application of heparin. Prompt diagnosis of HIT is important in order to change treatment to prevent severe thromboembolic complications. However, this is often difficult as thrombocytopenia is frequent in hospitalized patients and the commercially available laboratory tests for HIT antibodies have a high negative predictive value but only a poor positive predictive value. This leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of HIT, which also bear the risk for adverse outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims at resuming recent data on HIT, thereby focusing on the role of new anticoagulants and providing a framework for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, it provides some insights into the pathogenesis of this peculiar adverse drug reaction and ventures a guess at its future relevance in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

New drugs which are strongly negatively charged should be assessed for their capacity to form complexes with PF4. If they do so, they bear the risk of inducing a HIT-like immune response. The immunology of HIT is still largely unresolved. Understanding HIT might provide insights into other immune and autoimmune response mechanisms.

VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

How I treat pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates ∼ 1 to 2 of 1000 pregnancies, with pulmonary embolism being a leading cause of maternal mortality and deep vein thrombosis an important cause of maternal morbidity, also on the long term. However, a strong evidence base for the management of pregnancy-related VTE is missing. Management is not standardized between physicians, centers, and countries. The management of pregnancy-related VTE is based on extrapolation from the nonpregnant population, and clinical trial data for the optimal treatment are not available. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in therapeutic doses is the treatment of choice during pregnancy, and anticoagulation (LMWH or vitamin K antagonists postpartum) should be continued until 6 weeks after delivery with a minimum total duration of 3 months. Use of LMWH or vitamin K antagonists does not preclude breastfeeding. Whether dosing should be based on weight or anti-Xa levels is unknown, and practices differ between centers. Management of delivery, including the type of anesthesia if deemed necessary, requires a multidisciplinary approach, and several options are possible, depending on local preferences and patient-specific conditions.

Laboratory methods and management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The clinical effects of heparin are meritorious and heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for most clinical needs. However, as with any drug, adverse effects exist. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an important adverse effect of heparin associated with amputation and death due to thrombosis. Although the diagnosis and treatment of HIT can be difficult and complex, it is critical that patients with HIT be identified as soon as possible to initiate early treatment to avoid thrombosis.

The complex clinical picture of side effects to anticoagulation

Inflammatory plaques at injection sites are frequent side effects of heparin treatment and a clinical symptom of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to heparin. In most cases, changing the subcutaneous therapy from unfractionated to low-molecular-weight heparin or treatment with heparinoids does not provide improvement because of extensive cross-reactivity. Because of their completely different chemical structure, hirudins are a safe alternative for anticoagulation. Despite DTH to subcutaneously injected heparins, patients tolerate heparin intravenously. Therefore, in case of therapeutic necessity and DTH to heparins, the simple shift from subcutaneous to intravenous heparin administration is justified. Skin necrosis is a rare complication of anticoagulation. Heparin-induced skin necrosis is 1 of the symptoms of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and should result in the immediate cessation of heparin therapy to prevent potentially fatal thrombotic events. This is in contrast to coumarin-induced skin necrosis, where therapy may be continued or restarted at a lower dose.

Managing a pregnant patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the era of eculizumab

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare clonal stem cell disorder, which affects women of child-bearing age. PNH is associated with thrombotic complications, which are the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Management of a pregnant woman with PNH remains a challenge due to high incidence of thrombotic complications and the difficulty of differentiating a PNH crisis from the complications of pregnancy. PNH is associated with an increased rate of premature labor and fetal loss. Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the terminal complement protein C5, has revolutionized treatment of PNH. However, the role of eculizumab in pregnancy is unclear. We review the current strategies for the management of pregnant women with PNH, underline the controversies and present our recommendations.

Successful Use of Danaparoid in Two Pregnant Women With Heart Valve Prosthesis and Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II (HIT)

Anticoagulant therapy with heparin for the prevention of thromboembolism in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves is associated with an increased risk to the mother and/or the fetus. A life-threatening complication of the therapy with heparin is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT). danaparoid has not yet been reported to be safe and effective for this indication. This study reports on a 26-year-old woman with tricuspidal valve prosthesis and a 37-year-old woman with a St. Jude Medical mitral valve prosthesis who were anticoagulated with danaparoid during pregnancy because of HIT. Anti-Xa levels were between 0.6 and 1.2 IU/mL during pregnancy with target levels of 1.0 IU/mL. Cesarean section was performed at anti-Xa levels of 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL. One woman developed a placental hematoma at the 32nd week of gestation, which did not increase over the following week. Both patients delivered healthy boys. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valve can be successfully managed with danaparoid.

Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article discusses the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia, as well as the use of antithrombotic agents, during pregnancy and is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations are weaker and imply that the magnitude of the benefits and risks, burden, and costs are less certain. Support for recommendations may come from high-quality, moderate-quality or low-quality studies; labeled, respectively, A, B, and C. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for pregnant women, in general, we recommend that vitamin K antagonists should be substituted with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [Grade 1A], except perhaps in women with mechanical heart valves. For pregnant patients, we suggest LMWH over UFH for the prevention and treatment of VTE (Grade 2C). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we recommend that subcutaneous LMWH or UFH should be continued throughout pregnancy (Grade 1B) and suggest that anticoagulants should be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a total minimum duration of therapy of 6 months) [Grade 2C]. For pregnant patients with a single prior episode of VTE associated with a transient risk factor that is no longer present and no thrombophilia, we recommend clinical surveillance antepartum and anticoagulant prophylaxis postpartum (Grade 1C). For other pregnant women with a history of a single prior episode of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, we recommend one of the following, rather than routine care or full-dose anticoagulation: antepartum prophylactic LMWH/UFH or intermediate-dose LMWH/UFH or clinical surveillance throughout pregnancy plus postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 1C). For such patients with a higher risk thrombophilia, in addition to postpartum prophylaxis, we suggest antepartum prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH, rather than clinical surveillance (Grade 2C). We suggest that pregnant women with multiple episodes of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulants receive antepartum prophylactic, intermediate-dose, or adjusted-dose LMWH or intermediate or adjusted-dose UFH, followed by postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 2C). For those pregnant women with prior VTE who are receiving long-term anticoagulants, we recommend LMWH or UFH throughout pregnancy (either adjusted-dose LMWH or UFH, 75% of adjusted-dose LMWH, or intermediate-dose LMWH) followed by resumption of long-term anticoagulants postpartum (Grade 1C). We suggest both antepartum and postpartum prophylaxis for pregnant women with no prior history of VTE but antithrombin deficiency (Grade 2C). For all other pregnant women with thrombophilia but no prior VTE, we suggest antepartum clinical surveillance or prophylactic LMWH or UFH, plus postpartum anticoagulants, rather than routine care (Grade 2C). For women with recurrent early pregnancy loss or unexplained late pregnancy loss, we recommend screening for antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) [Grade 1A]. For women with these pregnancy complications who test positive for APLAs and have no history of venous or arterial thrombosis, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH or prophylactic LMWH combined with aspirin (Grade 1B). We recommend that the decision about anticoagulant management during pregnancy for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves include an assessment of additional risk factors for thromboembolism including valve type, position, and history of thromboembolism (Grade 1C). While patient values and preferences are important for all decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy, this is particularly so for women with mechanical heart valves. For these women, we recommend either adjusted-dose bid LMWH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), adjusted-dose UFH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), or one of these two regimens until the thirteenth week with warfarin substitution until close to delivery before restarting LMWH or UFH) [Grade 1C]. However, if a pregnant woman with a mechanical heart valve is judged to be at very high risk of thromboembolism and there are concerns about the efficacy and safety of LMWH or UFH as dosed above, we suggest vitamin K antagonists throughout pregnancy with replacement by UFH or LMWH close to delivery, after a thorough discussion of the potential risks and benefits of this approach (Grade 2C).

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Effect of oversulfated dermatan sulfate derivatives on platelet aggregation

We have investigated the effect on human platelet aggregation of native dermatan sulfate (DS) and three oversulfated DS derivatives with different sulfur contents, and compared it with that of unfractionated heparin. An inhibitory effect on collagen-induced platelet aggregation was observed only with unfractionated heparin at high concentrations, whereas no inhibitory effect was observed when arachidonic acid was used. Heparin was the most potent inhibitor of the thrombin-induced platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), whereas the oversulfated DS had a higher potency than the native DS. All these glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) also inhibited thrombin-induced aggregation of washed platelets in the presence of antithrombin (AT) or heparin cofactor II (HCII) but not in their absence. Heparin was by far the most potent inhibitor of washed platelet aggregation in the presence of AT, whereas the inhibitory effects of the DS (native or oversulfated) were lower but dependent on the sulfur content. In the presence of HCII, DSb, a slightly oversulfated DS, had the highest inhibitory effect, whereas heparin and DSd, the most oversulfated derivative, had lower potencies in this case. These data suggest that the inhibition of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation by the oversulfated DS derivatives is related to their ability to potentiate thrombin inactivation by AT or HCII. Hence, the oversulfated DS derivatives may not have an effect per se on the inhibition of platelet aggregation. They may constitute a new class of anticoagulants with enhanced anticoagulant effects in comparison with the native DS, but with only minor side-effects of bleeding in comparison with heparin.

Management of Pregnant Women with Thrombophilia or a History of Venous Thromboembolism

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this condition remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Approximately 50% of gestational VTE are associated with thrombophilia. Recent studies suggest that there is also a link between thrombophilia and pregnancy loss, as well as other gestational vascular complications. Although the most compelling data derive from women with antiphospholipid antibodies, the use of anticoagulation for prevention of these complications in women with heritable thrombophilia is becoming more frequent. This article reviews the management and prevention of VTE and other complications related to the heritable thrombophilias during pregnancy, an area that remains particularly challenging because of the potential for anticoagulant-related fetal as well as maternal complications and the paucity of good-quality data upon which to base clinical decisions.

Monitoring the effects and managing the side effects of anticoagulation during pregnancy

LMWHs are the major anticoagulant/antithrombotic treatment given to pregnant women to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism despite the absence of specific clinical trials. An emerging indication, the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes, is under investigation. During pregnancy, LMWHs seem to be safe and efficient. Some uncertainties remain about the management of rare potential side effects, particularly in the event of heparin intolerance and with cross-reactivity to danaparoid sodium.

Prophylaxis and treatment of thrombophilia in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombophilia in pregnancy, which is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism and placental vascular complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Topics include preventing deep vein thrombosis recurrence in pregnant women with constitutional thrombophilias, using prophylactic heparins throughout pregnancy and postpartum anticoagulants. Cases of thrombosis still occur in the postpartum period and other therapeutics should be tested. Primary prophylaxis is acceptable for high-risk thrombophilias. Early pregnancy losses (before the 10th week) are not associated with constitutional thrombophilias. The natural prognosis of embryonic losses associated with current thrombogenic polymorphisms is good, unlike fetal losses associated with the same thrombophilias: in this case, a prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin given from the beginning of the 8th week is more efficient than low-dose aspirin. Data are lacking on the prevention of severe preeclampsia, placental abruption, or intrauterine growth restriction in women with constitutional thrombophilias; preliminary results indicate that low-molecular-weight heparin may have some preventive effect. Specific studies are needed.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have shown the limits of available procedures for women with constitutional thrombophilia and have helped define the clinical situations in thrombophilia-related placental insufficiency in which prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin may be indicated.

Fondaparinux is a safe alternative in case of heparin intolerance during pregnancy

Heparin is the drug of choice for the treatment or the prevention of thromboembolic disease during pregnancy. However, treatment options are limited when heparin cannot be used because of hypersensitivity skin reactions. Despite the recent availability of new anticoagulant agents, data relating to their use during pregnancy are lacking. This report describes the successful management with fondaparinux, during 150 days, of a pregnant patient with protein S deficiency and prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who developed heparin and danaparoid hypersensitivity.

Minimising the risk of heparin-induced osteoporosis during pregnancy

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) may lead to symptomatic vertebral fractures in up to 3 out of every 100 people on long-term therapy. Ten-times that many people will experience a significant reduction in bone density leading to osteopoenia or osteoporosis. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be as effective as UFH in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Several well-established advantages of LMWH over UFH include increased bioavailability, more predictable dose response, less intensive coagulation monitoring, and a lower probability of causing immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. There is also some evidence that long-term LMWH therapy is less likely to cause osteoporotic fractures and significant reductions in bone mass than UFH. Both UFH and LMWH undergo pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy, which sometimes necessitates dosage adjustments. Fondaparinux is a synthetic antithrombotic agent, which specifically binds to antithrombin. It has been shown to be comparable to, or even more effective than, LMWH in the management of both arterial and venous thrombosis. Fondaparinux does not appear to have a negative effect on bone metabolism. Therefore, fondaparinux may be a safe and effective alternative to UFH and LMWH in women who require anticoagulation during pregnancy.