P2Y12 receptor inhibition and effect of morphine in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Maintenance therapy with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after cangrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 investigators' viewpoint

According to the ESC guidelines, cangrelor may be considered in P2Y12-inhibitor-naïve acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this review is to summarize available evidence on the optimal maintenance therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after cangrelor. Transitioning from cangrelor to a thienopyridine, but not ticagrelor, can be associated with a drug-drug interaction (DDI); therefore, a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) can be given any time before, during, or at the end of a cangrelor infusion, while a LD of clopidogrel or prasugrel should be administered at the time the infusion of cangrelor ends or within 30 minutes before the end of infusion in the case of a LD of prasugrel. Administration of any oral antiplatelet agent at the end of a cangrelor infusion will also result in a transient period of increased platelet reactivity. The inter-individual variability of this period is difficult to predict because it depends on many factors related to the patient and the treatment. In addition, experimental studies indicate that cangrelor may exert a cardioprotective effect beyond the blockade of platelet aggregation. Considering the available data, the potential use of cangrelor in ACS patients goes well beyond the current indications. Furthermore, we believe that it might be prudent to avoid use of thienopyridines during and soon after a cangrelor infusion until conclusive data on the effect of the DDI on the clinical outcome are available. On the other hand, ticagrelor seems to be an optimal oral agent for continuation of P2Y12 inhibition in patients receiving cangrelor infusion.

Exploring the morphine-platelet activity association in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is usually caused by a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque, with subsequent thrombus formation. Platelet inhibition and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are essential treatments. Morphine, used to relieve pain and anxiety in STEMI patients, delays the onset of P2Y12 inhibitors. This study aimed to further explore the association between platelet activity and morphine treatment in patients with STEMI. In this sub-study of the VALIDATE-SWEDHEART trial, 89 STEMI patients treated with ticagrelor, and primary PCI were included. Platelet aggregation and biomarkers of platelet activity, coagulation, and inflammation (sP-selectin, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, CD40L, CRP, beta-thromboglobulin, and pentraxin3) were assessed at three time points: before, one, and twelve hours after PCI. Of the 89 patients, 40 received morphine before hospital arrival. There were no significant differences in age, sex, medical history, or coronary disease extent. One hour after PCI, ADP-induced (36 vs 61, p < .001), arachidonic acid-induced (20 vs 36, p = .003), collagen-induced (48 vs 60, p = .03) aggregation, and the proportion of high on-treatment ADP-induced platelet reactivity (27% vs 60%, p = .001) were significantly higher in morphine-treated patients. No significant differences were found before or 12 hours after PCI. No significant differences in platelet activity biomarkers were observed. Morphine increased platelet aggregation in STEMI patients but did not affect biomarkers.

A Comprehensive Review of the Pleiotropic Effects of Ticagrelor

AIMS

This review summarizes the findings of preclinical studies evaluating the pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor. These include attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), inflammation, adverse cardiac remodeling, and atherosclerosis. In doing so, it aims to provide novel insights into ticagrelor's mechanisms and benefits over other P2Y12 inhibitors. It also generates viable hypotheses for the results of seminal clinical trials assessing ticagrelor use in acute and chronic coronary syndromes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A comprehensive review of the preclinical literature demonstrates that ticagrelor protects against IRI in the setting of both an acute myocardial infarction (MI), and when MI occurs while on chronic treatment. Maintenance therapy with ticagrelor also likely mitigates adverse inflammation, cardiac remodeling, and atherosclerosis, while improving stem cell recruitment. These effects are probably mediated by ticagrelor's ability to increase local interstitial adenosine levels which activate downstream cardio-protective molecules. Attenuation and augmentation of these pleiotropic effects by high-dose aspirin and caffeine, and statins respectively may help explain variable outcomes in PLATO and subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

CONCLUSION

Most RCTs and meta-analyses have not evaluated the pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor. We need further studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor versus other P2Y12 inhibitors that are mindful of the unique pleiotropic advantages afforded by ticagrelor, as well as possible interactions with other therapies (e.g., aspirin, statins, caffeine).

From Atherosclerotic Plaque to Myocardial Infarction-The Leading Cause of Coronary Artery Occlusion

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) constitutes the most common cause of death worldwide. In Europe alone, approximately 4 million people die annually due to CVD. The leading component of CVD leading to mortality is myocardial infarction (MI). MI is classified into several types. Type 1 is associated with atherosclerosis, type 2 results from inadequate oxygen supply to cardiomyocytes, type 3 is defined as sudden cardiac death, while types 4 and 5 are associated with procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively. Of particular note is type 1, which is also the most frequently occurring form of MI. Factors predisposing to its occurrence include, among others, high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the blood, cigarette smoking, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). The primary objective of this review is to elucidate the issues with regard to type 1 MI. Our paper delves into, amidst other aspects, its pathogenesis, risk assessment, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, and interventional treatment options in both acute and long-term conditions.

The Coronary Reperfusion Effect and Safety of Prehospital P2Y12 Inhibitor in Primary-PCI STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The concept of early administration of P2Y12 inhibitor in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely accepted, but whether prehospital administration results in greater coronary reperfusion remains unclear. Our study aims to analyze the benefit and safety of prehospital P2Y12 inhibitor compared to in-hospital P2Y12 inhibitor administration.

METHOD

Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched from database inception to June 2023. We included all types of studies except for conference publications, abstract presentations, reviews, and case reports. The primary outcomes were pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 2-3 (TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included post-PCI TIMI flow grade 2-3, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and short-term (30-day) mortality.

RESULT

Eight individual studies with a total of 10823 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with in-hospital P2Y12 inhibitor, prehospital P2Y12 inhibitor were associated with significantly higher rates of pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 2-3 (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09-1.61, p = 0.005) and post-PCI TIMI flow grade 2-3 (OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.04-1.97, p = 0.03), and a significantly lower risk of recurrent MI (OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.96, p = 0.03). There were no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding (OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, p = 0.98), MACE (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.70-1.25, p = 0.65), or short-term mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.50-1.51, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Prehospital P2Y12 inhibitor compared to in-hospital P2Y12 inhibitor is associated with a significantly higher rate of pre-PCI and post-PCI TIMI flow grade 2-3, a reduced risk of recurrent MI, and no increase in major bleeding in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Platelet inhibition with orodispersible ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes according to morphine use: the TASTER study final results

AIM

To date, it is still unknown whether orodispersible tablet (ODT) ticagrelor might represent a suitable way to reach a proper antiaggregation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving morphine. Aim of the present study was to evaluate platelet inhibition with 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose (LD) administered as ODT compared with standard coated tablet ticagrelor formulation in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to morphine use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One-hundred and 30 patients presenting with STEMI or very high-risk NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to receive ODT or standard ticagrelor LD. Potential morphine-ticagrelor interaction was assessed by stratified randomization according to morphine use. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by Platelet Reactivity Units (PRU) VerifyNow™ 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after ticagrelor LD. The primary endpoint was residual platelet reactivity 1 h after LD across the two ticagrelor formulation and according to morphine use. Safety endpoints were major bleedings and other in-hospital ticagrelor administration-related adverse events. One hour after LD, PRU median value was higher in morphine-treated patients (N = 32) as compared with patients not receiving morphine (N = 98; PRU = 187 [70-217]) vs. 73 [7-187]; P = 0.012). In patients with morphine, 1-h PRU values were similar between study groups (192 [114-236] vs. 173 [16-215] in ODT and standard tablet ticagrelor, respectively). Similarly, in patients without morphine, 1-h PRU values were not significantly different between study groups (69 [8-152] vs. 110 [6-193] in ODT and standard tablet ticagrelor, respectively). Platelet reactivity appeared similar in the 2 study arms at 2, 4, and 6 h after LD. No significant difference was observed among patients with or without morphine regarding in-hospital adverse events or drug side-effects, even if a reinfarction due to acute stent thrombosis was observed in a patient treated with morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference between ODT and standard ticagrelor tablets in terms of post-LD residual platelet reactivity, percentage of platelet inhibition or safety regardless to morphine use.

Recombinant Apyrase (AZD3366) Against Myocardial Reperfusion Injury

PURPOSE

Recombinant apyrase (AZD3366) increases adenosine production and ticagrelor inhibits adenosine reuptake. We investigated whether intravenous AZD3366 before reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size (IS) and whether AZD3366 and ticagrelor have additive effects.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 30 min ischemia. At 25 min of ischemia, animals received intravenous AZD3366 or vehicle. Additional animals received intravenous CGS15943 (an adenosine receptor blocker) or intraperitoneal ticagrelor. At 24 h reperfusion, IS was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Other rats were subjected to 30 min ischemia followed by 1 h or 24 h reperfusion. Myocardial samples were assessed for adenosine levels, RT-PCR, and immunoblotting.

RESULTS

AZD3366 and ticagrelor reduced IS. The protective effect was blocked by CGS15943. The effect of AZD3366 + ticagrelor was significantly greater than AZD3366. One hour after infarction, myocardial adenosine levels significantly increased with AZD3366, but not with ticagrelor. In contrast, 24 h after infarction, adenosine levels were equally increased by AZD3366 and ticagrelor, and levels were higher in the AZD3366 + ticagrelor group. One hour after reperfusion, AZD3366 and ticagrelor equally attenuated the increase in interleukin-15 (an early inflammatory marker after ischemic cell death) levels, and their combined effects were additive. AZD3366, but not ticagrelor, significantly attenuated the increase in RIP1, RIP3, and P-MLKL (markers of necroptosis) 1 h after reperfusion. AZD3366, but not ticagrelor, significantly attenuated the increase in IL-6 and GSDMD-N (markers of pyroptosis) 1 h after reperfusion. At 24 h of reperfusion, both agents equally attenuated the increase in these markers, and their effects were additive.

CONCLUSIONS

AZD3366 attenuated inflammation, necrosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis and limited IS. The effects of AZD3366 and ticagrelor were additive.

Negative Impact of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Morphine Dose on Ticagrelor Uptake and Pharmacodynamics: A Population PK/PD Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is widely used in patients with stable and acute coronary artery disease. Understanding the factors that influence its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) could improve therapeutic outcomes. We therefore performed a pooled population PK/PD analysis using individual patient data from two studies. We focused on the impact of morphine administration and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on the risk of high platelet reactivity (HPR) and dyspnea.

METHODS

A parent-metabolite population PK/PD model was developed based on data from 63 STEMI, 50 non-STEMI, and 25 chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. Simulations were then run to evaluate the risk of non-response and adverse events associated with the identified variability factors.

RESULTS

The final PK model consisted of first-order absorption with transit compartments, distribution with two compartments for ticagrelor and one compartment for AR-C124910XX (active metabolite of ticagrelor), and linear elimination for both drugs. The final PK/PD model was an indirect turnover model with production inhibition. Morphine dose and STEMI, independently, had a significant negative effect on the absorption rate (reduction of log([Formula: see text]) by 0.21×morphine dose (mg) and by 2.37 in STEMI patients, both p < 0.001), and the presence of STEMI significantly impacted both efficacy and potency (both p < 0.001). The simulations run with the validated model showed a high rate of non-response in patients with those covariates (RR 1.19 for morphine, 4.11 for STEMI and 5.73 for morphine and STEMI, all three p < 0.001). By increasing ticagrelor dosage, the negative morphine effect was reversible in patients without STEMI and just limited in patients with STEMI.

CONCLUSION

The developed population PK/PD model confirmed the negative impact of morphine administration and presence of STEMI on ticagrelor PK and antiplatelet effect. Increasing ticagrelor doses seems effective in morphine users without STEMI, whereas the STEMI effect is not entirely reversible.

Advances in Cardiovascular Pharmacology in Atherosclerotic-Related Therapeutic Areas: Addressing Patients' Clinical Needs

Over the last three decades, a significant improvement has been achieved in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [...].

Precision antiplatelet therapy

A State of the Art lecture titled "Personalizing Antiplatelet Therapy Based on Platelet Turnover and Metabolic Phenotype" was presented by Bianca Rocca at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress in 2022. Increased variability in drug response may be associated with serious, mechanism-based and off-target side effects, especially in the case of drugs that do not routinely undergo therapeutic drug monitoring, such as antiplatelet drugs or direct oral anticoagulants. Precision pharmacology can be defined as the identification of a drug regimen that maximizes the benefit/risk balance at the level of an individual patient. Key tools for identifying relevant sources of variability and developing precision drug dosing are represented by genetic, biochemical, and pharmacological biomarkers recognized as a valid surrogate or strong predictor of major clinical complications. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and/or disease-related biomarkers are central to identifying the right population to be targeted, characterizing the sources of variability in drug response, guiding precision treatments that maximize benefits and minimize risks, and designing precision dosing trials. Another valuable tool for guiding precision pharmacology is represented by in silico pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models and simulations instructed by real-world data of validated biomarkers. This review critically analyzes the tools for precision dosing and exemplifies conditions in which precision dosing can considerably optimize the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet drugs, namely aspirin and P2Y12 receptor blockers, used alone and in combination. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2022 ISTH Congress.

Spontaneous Reperfusion in Patients with Transient ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Prevalence, Importance and Approaches to Management

Patients with transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or spontaneous resolution (SpR) of the ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram could potentially represent a unique group of patients posing a therapeutic management dilemma. In this review, we discuss the potential mechanisms underlying SpR, its relation to clinical outcomes and the proposed management options for patients with transient STEMI with a focus on immediate versus early percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed a structured literature search of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2020. Studies focused on SpR in patients with acute coronary syndrome were selected. Available data suggest that deferral of angiography and revascularization within 24-48 h in these patients is reasonable and associated with similar or perhaps better outcomes than immediate angiography. Further randomized trials are needed to elucidate the best pharmacological and invasive strategies for this cohort.

Morphine and clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic and antiplatelet therapy: Insights from the TREAT trial

BACKGROUND

Morphine is commonly used to relieve pain, anxiety and dyspnea in STEMI but it lowers blood pressure and delays the activity of oral antiplatelet agents. The impact of morphine on clinical outcomes remains unknown. This analysis was performed to determine if morphine use was associated with increased risk of adverse clinical events among STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

METHODS

In the Ticagrelor in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Pharmacological Thrombolysis (TREAT) study, 3799 STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis were randomized to receive clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Morphine use was left to the discretion of the treating physicians. In this pre-specified analysis, we evaluated clinical outcomes based on the use and timing of morphine administration. Outcomes were stratified by randomized treatment group. Multivariable analysis was performed using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) weighting.

RESULTS

Morphine was used in 53% of patients. After adjustment using IPTW weighting, morphine use was associated with higher hazard of reinfarction at 7 days (HR 4.9, P = .0006) and 30 days (HR 1.7, P = .04), and lower hazard of major bleeding (HR 0.37, P = .006). There was no significant difference in mortality at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic therapy, morphine use was associated with a higher risk of early reinfarction and a lower risk of major bleeding but no difference in mortality.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02298088.

Complementary Pharmacotherapy for STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI: An Evidence-Based Clinical Approach

Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the acute management of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients includes therapy for pain relief and potential additional strategies for cardioprotection. The safety and efficacy of some commonly used treatments have been questioned by recent evidence. Indeed a concern about morphine use is the interaction between opioids and oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors; early beta-blocker treatment has shown conflicting results for the improvement of clinical outcomes; and supplemental oxygen therapy lacks benefit in patients without hypoxia and may be of potential harm. Other additional strategies remain disappointing; however, some treatments may be selectively used. Therefore, we intend to present a critical updated review of complementary pharmacotherapy for a modern treatment approach for STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Selatogrel: A Novel Subcutaneous P2Y12 Inhibitor

ABSTRACT

The use of a P2Y12 inhibitor as a component of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is well established. However, the P2Y12 inhibitors currently available have pharmacokinetic limitations due to delayed absorption, lack of enteral access for administration with oral formulations, need for intravenous access with cangrelor, or need for metabolization to be ideal in the critical 3-hour window during an ACS. Selatogrel is a novel, potent, reversible, and selective 2-phenylprimdine-4-carboxamide administered subcutaneously under development. Results from preclinical, phase 1, and phase 2 trials have confirmed that the agent provides sustained and reversible P2Y12 platelet inhibition with an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported adverse effects include minor bleeding and dyspnea. Phase 3 trials are being designed to understand the critical role this agent can play in upstream management of patients with ACS including a more defined understanding of the adverse effect profile, how to transition from this agent to an oral agent, who will be administering, and does this agent allow for a safe and quick transition to coronary artery bypass graft surgery if needed. Should it obtain approval, selatogrel has the potential to provide a unique and advantageous mechanism for P2Y12 inhibition.

Cost-Consequence Analysis of Using Cangrelor in High Angiographic Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients: A US Hospital Perspective

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate a US hospital's cost implications and outcomes of cangrelor use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients with two or more angiographic high-risk features (HRFs), including avoidance of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitor pretreatment in patients requiring cardiac surgery. Intravenous cangrelor provides direct, immediate onset and rapid-offset P2Y₁₂ inhibition, which may reduce the necessity for oral P2Y₁₂ pretreatment.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was developed, estimating the annual impact over 3 years of cangrelor availability. Ischemic and bleeding events (48 h) from randomized clinical trial data were extrapolated to 30 days. Event costs were from the CHAMPION PHOENIX Economics substudy. Rates of coronary artery disease (CAD) presentation, PCI, oral P2Y₁₂ pretreatment, and inpatient hospitalization costs were from published literature and clinical experts. Scenario analyses evaluated the impact of cangrelor availability on potential reduced P2Y₁₂ pretreatment rates by 50-100%. Drug costs were 2019 wholesale acquisition costs and, where necessary, all costs were adjusted to 2019 dollars.

RESULTS

In a hospital treating 1000 CAD PCI inpatients annually, increasing cangrelor use from 11 to 32% resulted in a reduction in 48-h ischemic events/year by 5.7%, while bleeding events increased by 2.9%. Total costs of $1,135,472 declined 12.8%, with a 50% reduction in P2Y₁₂ pretreatment or 30% with no pretreatment. Savings were driven by a decrease in ischemic events, decrease in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, and less need for and shorter oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitor washout period for surgery patients.

CONCLUSION

Use of cangrelor in patients with two or more angiographic HRFs may improve outcomes and lower hospital budgets, mainly from avoiding surgery delays necessitated by oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitor pretreatment.

Impact of vomiting on P2Y12 platelet inhibition in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A prespecified subanalysis of the ON-TIME 3 trial

Vomiting is associated with lower levels of ticagrelor concentration and higher platelet reactivity in the early hours of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. These results support reloading with a ticagrelor loading dose and/or treatment with intravenous platelet inhibitors when patients vomit.

P2Y12 inhibition in acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous intervention - Understanding the debate on Prasugrel or Ticagrelor

After more than 10 years of routine clinical use, a debate about the preference of prasugrel over ticagrelor has been unveiled following publication of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial, an investigator-initiated trial directly comparing both substances as part of dual anti-platelet therapy following interventional treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Both substances had been tested in trials, approved by authorities and subsequently recommended by guidelines according to the strategy applied in the respective approval trial. This resulted in prasugrel tested in TRITON only be given after diagnostic coronary angiography in the absence of ST-segment elevations (NSTE-ACS) and ticagrelor tested in PLATO being administered even before diagnostic coronary angiography in all forms of acute coronary syndromes. Whichever way was safest and most efficient, had never been clarified before. ISAR-REACT 5 showed superior efficacy of prasugrel over ticagrelor in general, and of deferred administration of prasugrel over pre-treatment with ticagrelor in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Subsequently, in 2020 the European guidelines for NSTE-ACS adopted both positions in recommending the respective preference. Afterwards, a confrontational debate erupted between those favouring the ISAR-REACT 5 results and their implementation in guidelines and others still preferring the generalized interpretation of the overall study results from PLATO. In this review, we reflect the history leading to trial design of TRITON and PLATO and the way this subsequently impacted on clinical practice and guideline recommendations.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Approved and Investigational P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists

Coronary artery disease remains the major cause of mortality worldwide. Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are cornerstone treatments for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Clopidogrel has long been the gold standard but has major pharmacological limitations such as a slow onset and long duration of effect, as well as weak platelet inhibition with high inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There has been a strong need to develop potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists with more favorable pharmacological properties. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent and have a faster onset of action; however, they have shown an increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is highly potent and has a very rapid onset and offset of effect; however, its indication is limited to P2Y12 antagonist-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development, namely vicagrel and selatogrel. Vicagrel is an analog of clopidogrel with enhanced and more efficient formation of its active metabolite. Selatogrel is characterized by a rapid onset of action following subcutaneous administration and developed for early treatment of a suspected acute myocardial infarction. This review article describes the clinical pharmacology profile of marketed P2Y12 receptor antagonists and those under development focusing on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction liability.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of subcutaneous administration of a novel glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, RUC-4, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Pre-hospital platelet inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may improve outcomes. RUC-4 is a novel, second-generation glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor designed for first-point-of-medical-contact treatment for STEMI by subcutaneous injection.

AIMS

The open-label, phase 2A, CEL-02 trial aimed to assess the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and tolerability of RUC-4 in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (pPCI).

METHODS

A total of 27 STEMI patients received a weight-adjusted subcutaneous injection of RUC-4 before pPCI in escalating doses (0.075 mg/kg [n=8], 0.090 mg/kg [n=9], or 0.110 mg/kg [n=10]).

RESULTS

The primary PD endpoint of high-grade (≥77%) inhibition of the VerifyNow iso-TRAP assay at 15 minutes was met in 3/8, 7/8, and 7/8 patients in the three cohorts with a dose-response relationship (mean inhibition [min - max] of 77.5% [65.7%-90.6%], 87.5% [73.8%-93.1%], and 91.7% [76.4%-99.3%], respectively; ptrend=0.002). Fifty percent (50%) inhibition remained after 89.1 (38.0-129.7), 104.2 (17.6-190.8), and 112.4 (19.7-205.0) minutes. Injection site reactions or bruising were observed in 1 (4%) and 11 (41%) patients, respectively. Mild access-site haematomas occurred in 6 (22%), and severe access-site haematomas occurred in 2 patients (7%). No thrombocytopaenia was observed within 72 hours post dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with STEMI, a single subcutaneous dose of RUC-4 at 0.075, 0.090, and 0.110 mg/kg showed dose-response high-grade inhibition of platelet function within 15 minutes.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors use in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients pre-treated with newer P2Y12 inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the safety and potential benefit of administrating glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) on top of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND

A number of clinical trials, performed at a time when pretreatment and potent platelet inhibition was not part of routine clinical practice, have documented clinical benefits of GPI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding.

METHODS

We used the data of a prospective, ongoing registry of patients admitted for STEMI in our center. For the purpose of this study only patients presenting for primary percutaneous coronary intervention and pretreated with new P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) were included. We compared patients who received GPI with those who did not.

RESULTS

Eight hundred twenty-four STEMI patients were included in our registry; GPIs were used in 338 patients (41%). GPI patients presented more often with cardiogenic shock and Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3. GPI use was not associated with an increase in in-hospital or 3-month mortality. Bleeding endpoints were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that GPI may be used safely in combination with recent P2Y12 inhibitors in STEMI patients in association with modern primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategies (radial access and anticoagulation with enoxaparin) with similar bleeding and mortality rates at hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up.

Pre-hospital heparin use for ST-elevation myocardial infarction is safe and improves angiographic outcomes

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate if pre-hospital heparin administration by paramedics is safe and improves clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the multicentre Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry, linked with state-wide ambulance records, we identified consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI between January 2014 and December 2018. Information on thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow at angiography was available in a subset of cases. Patients receiving pre-hospital heparin were compared to those who did not receive heparin. Findings at coronary angiography and 30-day clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Propensity-score matching was performed for risk adjustment. We identified a total of 4720 patients. Of these, 1967 patients had TIMI flow data available. Propensity-score matching in the entire cohort yielded 1373 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, there was no observed difference in 30-day mortality (no-heparin 3.5% vs. heparin 3.0%, P = 0.25), MACCE (no-heparin 7% vs. heparin 6.2%, P = 0.44), and major bleeding (no-heparin 1.9% vs. heparin 1.4%, P = 0.64) between groups. Propensity-score analysis amongst those with TIMI data produced 552 matched pairs. The proportion of cases with TIMI 0 or 1 flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) was lower among those receiving pre-hospital heparin (66% vs. 76%, P < 0.001) compared to those who did not.

CONCLUSION 

In this multicentre, propensity-score matched study, the use of pre-hospital heparin by paramedics was safe and is associated with fewer occluded IRAs in patients presenting with STEMI.

Tackling the gap in platelet inhibition with oral antiplatelet agents in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction: Oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors represent the mainstay therapy for the prevention of thrombotic complications in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the onset of antiplatelet action of the oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors is affected by their need to be absorbed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract before becoming systemically available.Areas covered: Following oral intake of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, the timeframe required for GI absorption leads to a window of inadequate antiplatelet protection during which patients are at increased thrombotic risk. The onset of action of the oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors is even further delayed in high-risk patients, underscoring the need to define strategies to bridge the gap in platelet inhibitory effects following their intake.Expert opinion: Multiple mechanisms may impair GI absorption leading to a delay in the onset of action of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. Several strategies have been tested to overcome the gap in platelet inhibition in high-risk patients undergoing PCI. These include administration of crushed or chewed tablets to improve the dissolution rate and use of opioid receptor antagonists or metoclopramide to counteract impairment of gastric motility induced by opioids. However, intravenous antiplatelet therapies represent the most effective strategy to bridge such gap in platelet inhibition.

Impact of Morphine Treatment With and Without Metoclopramide Coadministration on Myocardial and Microvascular Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Randomized MonAMI Trial

Background

Intravenous morphine administration can adversely affect platelet inhibition induced by P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction. In contrast, some evidence suggests that opioid agonists may have cardioprotective effects on the myocardium. The aim of this prospective, randomized MonAMI (Impact of Morphine Treatment With and Without Metoclopramide Coadministration on Platelet Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial was, therefore, to investigate the impact of morphine with or without metoclopramide coadministration on myocardial and microvascular injury.

Methods and Results

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (n=138) were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to ticagrelor 180 mg plus: (1) intravenous morphine 5 mg (morphine group); (2) intravenous morphine 5 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg (morphine+metoclopramide group); or (3) intravenous placebo (control group) administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 104 patients on day 1 to 4 after the index event. Infarct size was significantly smaller in the morphine only group as compared with controls (percentage of left ventricular mass, 15.5 versus 17.9; P=0.047). Furthermore, the number of patients with microvascular obstruction was significantly lower after morphine administration (28% versus 54%; P=0.022) and the extent of microvascular obstruction was smaller (percentage of left ventricular mass, 0 versus 0.74; P=0.037). In multivariable regression analysis, morphine administration was independently associated with a reduced risk for the occurrence of microvascular obstruction (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14–0.93 [P=0.035]). There was no significant difference in infarct size (P=0.491) and extent (P=0.753) or presence (P=0.914) of microvascular obstruction when comparing the morphine+metoclopramide group with the control group.

Conclusions

In this randomized study, intravenous administration of morphine before primary percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in a significant reduction of myocardial and microvascular damage following acute myocardial infarction. This effect was not observed in the morphine plus metoclopramide group.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02627950.

Impact of periprocedural morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI

BACKGROUND

Intravenous morphine (MO) decreases the effect of all oral platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that its use may be associated with larger infarct size. Yet, there are limited data available about the impact of this interaction on clinical outcomes. We studied the effect of MO on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary PCI using a prospective registry.

METHODS

Of the 1255 patients who underwent primary PCI, 397 received MO based on physician's judgment. Clopidogrel was used as P2Y12 receptor antagonist in all cases. Median follow-up time was 7.5 years with 457 deaths. To adjust for confounding, two propensity score-based procedures were performed: 1 to 1 matching (PSM, 728 cases), and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) retaining data from all patients. Primary outcome measure was time to all-cause death, whereas predischarge left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was used as secondary end point.

RESULTS

An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved by both methods. We found no difference in survival as the HR (MO/no MO) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.26), p = 0.86 using PSM and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.84-1.23), p = 0.88 with IPTW. Likewise, distributions of LVEFs were similar using either methods: with PSM, median LVEFs were 50.0% (interquartile range [IQR]: 43.0%-55.3%) vs 50.0% (IQR: 42.0%-55.0%) in the no MO and MO groups, respectively (p = 0.76), whereas using IPTW, they were 50.0% (IQR: 42.5%-55.0%) vs 50.0% (IQR: 41.0%-55.0%), respectively (p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality and on predischarge ejection fraction in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related myonecrosis is frequent and can affect the long-term prognosis of patients. To our knowledge, ticagrelor has not been evaluated in elective PCI and could reduce periprocedural ischaemic complications compared with clopidogrel, the currently recommended treatment. The aim of the ALPHEUS study was to examine if ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis in stable coronary patients undergoing high-risk elective PCI.

METHODS

The ALPHEUS study, a phase 3b, randomised, open-label trial, was done at 49 hospitals in France and Czech Republic. Patients with stable coronary artery disease were eligible for the study if they had an indication for PCI and at least one high-risk characteristic. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter for 30 days) or clopidogrel (300-600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter for 30 days) by use of an interactive web response system, and stratified by centre. The primary outcome was a composite of PCI-related type 4 (a or b) myocardial infarction or major myocardial injury and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, both of which were evaluated within 48 h of PCI (or at hospital discharge if earlier). The primary analysis was based on all events that occurred in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617290.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 9, 2017, and May 28, 2020, 1910 patients were randomly assigned at 49 sites, 956 to the ticagrelor group and 954 to the clopidogrel group. 15 patients were excluded from the ticagrelor group and 12 from the clopidogrel group. At 48 h, the primary outcome was observed in 334 (35%) of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group and 341 (36%) of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio [OR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·17; p=0·75). The primary safety outcome did not differ between the two groups, but minor bleeding events were more frequently observed with ticagrelor than clopidogrel at 30 days (105 [11%] of 941 patients in the ticagrelor group vs 71 [8%] of 942 patients in the clopidogrel group; OR 1·54, 95% CI 1·12-2·11; p=0·0070).

INTERPRETATION

Ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in reducing periprocedural myocardial necrosis after elective PCI and did not cause an increase in major bleeding, but did increase the rate of minor bleeding at 30 days. These results support the use of clopidogrel as the standard of care for elective PCI.

FUNDING

ACTION Study Group and AstraZeneca.

Impact of opioids on P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who are pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor: Opioids aNd crushed Ticagrelor In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (ON-TIME 3) trial

Aims

Platelet inhibition induced by P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can be affected by concomitant use of opioids. The aim of this trial was to examine the effect of intravenous (iv) acetaminophen compared with iv fentanyl on P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibition in patients with STEMI.

Methods and results

The Opioids aNd crushed Ticagrelor In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (ON-TIME 3) trial randomized 195 STEMI patients who were scheduled to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor to iv acetaminophen (N = 98) or iv fentanyl (N = 97) in the ambulance. The primary endpoint, consisting of the level of platelet reactivity units (PRU) measured immediately after primary PCI, was not significantly different between the study arms [median PRU 104 (IQR 37–215) vs. 175 (63–228), P = 0.18]. However, systemic levels of ticagrelor were significantly higher in the acetaminophen arm at the start of primary PCI [151 ng/mL (32–509) vs. 60 ng/mL (13–206), P = 0.007], immediately after primary PCI [326 ng/mL (94–791) vs. 115 ng/mL (38–326), P = 0.002], and at 1 h after primary PCI [488 ng/mL (281–974) vs. 372 ng/mL (95–635), P = 0.002]. Acetaminophen resulted in the same extent of pain relief when compared with fentanyl [reduction of 3 points on 10-step-pain scale before primary PCI (IQR 1–5)] in both study arms (P = 0.67) and immediately after PCI [reduction of 5 points (3–7); P = 0.96].

Conclusion

The iv acetaminophen in comparison with iv fentanyl was not associated with significantly lower platelet reactivity in STEMI patients but resulted in significantly higher ticagrelor plasma levels and was effective in pain relief.

Life-threatening arrhythmias in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: adverse impact of morphine

AIMS

Important controversies remain concerning the determinants of life-threatening arrhythmias during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and their impact on late adverse events. This study sought to investigate which factors might facilitate ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), in a homogeneous population of anterior STEMI patients defined by abrupt left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion and no collateral flow.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 967 patients, who entered into the CIRCUS (Does Cyclosporine ImpRove Clinical oUtcome in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients) study, were assessed for further analysis. Acute VT/VF was defined as VT (run of tachycardia >30 s either self-terminated or requiring electrical/pharmacological cardioversion) or VF documented by electrocardiogram or cardiac monitoring, during transportation to the cathlab or initial hospitalization. VT/VF was documented in 136 patients (14.1%). Patients with VT/VF were younger and had shorter time from symptom onset to hospital arrival. Site of LAD occlusion, thrombus burden, area at risk, pre-percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow, and ST-segment resolution were similar to that of patients without VT/VF. There was no impact of VT/VF on left ventricular remodelling or clinical outcomes. By multivariate analysis, the use of morphine (odds ratio 1.71; 95% confidence interval (1.13-2.60); P = 0.012) was the sole independent predictor of VT/VF occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients with LAD occlusion, our findings support the view that morphine could favour severe ventricular arrhythmias.

Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Chinese Patients with STEMI and NSTEMI Without Opioid Administration

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) study of ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without opioid administration has never been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the antiplatelet effects and the PK parameters of ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS without opioid administration.

METHODS

A sample size of 30 eligible patients with ACS were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were obtained predose and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after 180 mg LD of ticagrelor. P2Y₁₂ reactivity units (PRU) and plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its two metabolites were measured.

RESULTS

In total, 15 patients were admitted to ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) groups, respectively. For patients with NSTEMI, PRU declined significantly during the first 4 h and maintained a relatively stable antiplatelet effect from 4 to 12 h after LD. A similar trend was found in the STEMI group without significant differences of PRU in each designed time compared with patients with NSTEMI (P > 0.05). T_max of metabolite AR-C124910XX was 4 h after LD for both groups. There were no significant differences for drug concentration, C_max, or AUC of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX between patients with STEMI and NSTEMI (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For Chinese patients with ACS, at least 4 h was needed to achieve an adequate antiplatelet effect for ticagrelor LD. There were no differences in PK or PD between Chinese patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800014764.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of single-dose subcutaneous administration of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes

AIMS

To study the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist for subcutaneous administration, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this double-blind, randomized study of 345 patients with CCS on background oral antiplatelet therapy, subcutaneous selatogrel (8 mg, n = 114; or 16 mg, n = 115) was compared with placebo (n = 116) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03384966). Platelet aggregation was assessed over 24 h (VerifyNow assay) and 8 h (light transmittance aggregometry; LTA). Pharmacodynamic responders were defined as patients having P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) <100 at 30 min post-dose and lasting ≥3 h. At 30 min post-dose, 89% of patients were responders to selatogrel 8 mg, 90% to selatogrel 16 mg, and 16% to placebo (P < 0.0001). PRU values (mean ± standard deviation) were 10 ± 25 (8 mg), 4 ± 10 (16 mg), and 163 ± 73 (placebo) at 15 min and remained <100 up to 8 h for both doses, returning to pre-dose or near pre-dose levels by 24 h post-dose. LTA data showed similarly rapid and potent inhibition of platelet aggregation. Selatogrel plasma concentrations peaked ∼30 min post-dose. Selatogrel was safe and well-tolerated with transient dyspnoea occurring overall in 7% (16/229) of patients (95% confidence interval: 4-11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Selatogrel was rapidly absorbed following subcutaneous administration in CCS patients, providing prompt, potent, and consistent platelet P2Y12 inhibition sustained for ≥8 h and reversible within 24 h. Further studies of subcutaneous selatogrel are warranted in clinical scenarios where rapid platelet inhibition is desirable.

Morphine and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND

Mechanistic studies have shown that morphine blunts the antiplatelet effects of oral adenosine diphosphate receptor blockers. However, the clinical relevance of this interaction is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the association between morphine and ischemic events in 5,438 patients treated with concomitant clopidogrel presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) in the EARLY ACS (Early Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial. Patients not treated with clopidogrel (n = 3,462) were used as negative controls.

METHODS

Endpoints were the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), recurrent ischemia, or thrombotic bailout at 96 h (4-way endpoint) and the composite of death or MI at 30 days.

RESULTS

In patients treated with clopidogrel, morphine use was associated with higher rates of the 4-way endpoint at 96 h (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.87; p = 0.026). There was a trend for higher rates of death or MI at 30 days (adjusted OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.70; p = 0.072), driven by events in the first 48 h (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.23; p = 0.021). In patients not treated with clopidogrel, morphine was not associated with either the 4-way endpoint at 96 h (adjusted OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.49; p = 0.79; p_interaction = 0.36 ) or death or MI at 30 days (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.48; p = 0.70; p_interaction = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

When used concomitantly with clopidogrel pre-treatment, morphine was associated with higher rates of ischemic events in patients with NSTEACS. (EARLY ACS: Early Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT00089895).

New Antithrombotic Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome

In recent years, much progress has been made in the field of antithrombotic drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment, as reflected by the introduction of the more potent P2Y12-inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor, and novel forms of concomitant anticoagulation, such as fondaparinux and bivalirudin. However, despite substantial improvements in contemporary ACS treatment, there remains residual ischemic risk in this group and hence the need for even more effective antithrombotic drugs, while balancing antithrombotic efficacy against bleeding risk. This review discusses recently introduced and currently developed antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in ACS treatment.

Influence of intravenous fentanyl compared with morphine on ticagrelor absorption and platelet inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the PERSEUS randomized trial

AIMS

Recent evidence demonstrates that intravenous morphine significantly reduces absorption and delays onset of action of oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). We aimed to assess the influence of intravenous fentanyl compared with morphine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) in patients undergoing pPCI for STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single-centre, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study that will randomly assign in a 1:1 ratio patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI to receive intravenous fentanyl or morphine following a pre-hospital 180-mg loading dose of ticagrelor (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02531165). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses will be performed at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h post-loading dose. Pharmacodynamic assessments will include P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) measured by VerifyNow P2Y12. Pharmacokinetic assessments include determination of maximal observed plasma concentrations, time for maximal plasma concentration, and area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX. The primary endpoint is platelet reactivity assessed by PRU at 2 h post ticagrelor loading dose.

CONCLUSION

PERSEUS will provide randomized data regarding the impact of fentanyl administration, in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI, on platelet inhibition and ticagrelor absorption and total exposure.

Analgesia in acute ischemic chest pain

Analgesics, particularly opioids, have been routinely used in the emergency treatment of ischemic chest pain for a long time. In the past two decades; however, several studies have raised the possibility of the harmful effects of opioid administration. In 2014, the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) changed the guidelines regarding the use of opioids from class IC to class IIb for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. And in 2015, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines incidentally noted the side effects of opioids. In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, both ESC and AHA/ACCF still recommend the use of opioids. Given the need for adequate pain relief in ischemic chest pain in the emergency setting, it is necessary to understand the adverse effects of analgesia, while still providing sufficiently potent options for analgesia. The primary purpose of this review is to quantify the effects of analgesics commonly used in the prehospital and emergency department in patients with ischemic chest pain.

Impact of Morphine Treatment on Infarct Size and Reperfusion Injury in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Current evidence regarding the effect of intravenous morphine administration on reperfusion injury and/or cardioprotection in patients with myocardial infarction is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of morphine administration, on infarct size and reperfusion injury assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a large multicenter ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. In total, 734 STEMI patients reperfused by primary percutaneous coronary intervention <12 h after symptom onset underwent CMR imaging at eight centers for assessment of myocardial damage. Intravenous morphine administration was recorded in all patients. CMR was completed within one week after infarction using a standardized protocol. The clinical endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 12 months after infarction. Intravenous morphine was administered in 61.8% (n = 454) of all patients. There were no differences in infarct size (17%LV, interquartile range [IQR] 8–25%LV versus 16%LV, IQR 8–26%LV, p = 0.67) and microvascular obstruction (p = 0.92) in patients with versus without morphine administration. In the subgroup of patients with early reperfusion within 120 min and reduced flow of the infarcted vessel (TIMI-flow ≤2 before PCI) morphine administration resulted in significantly smaller infarcts (12%LV, IQR 12–19 versus 19%LV, IQR 10–29, p = 0.035) and reduced microvascular obstruction (p = 0.003). Morphine administration had no effect on hard clinical endpoints (log-rank test p = 0.74) and was not an independent predictor of clinical outcome in Cox regression analysis. In our large multicenter CMR study, morphine administration did not have a negative effect on myocardial damage or clinical prognosis in acute reperfused STEMI. In patients, presenting early ( ≤120 min) morphine may have a cardioprotective effect as reflected by smaller infarcts; but this finding has to be assessed in further well-designed clinical studies

Impact of Preadmission Morphine on Reinfarction in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Opiates are the traditional analgesics used in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pharmacodynamic studies indicate that opiates delay the absorption of orally administered P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and the onset of platelet inhibition. Whether these negative effects on platelet inhibition have an impact on clinical outcomes is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies comparing morphine and no-morphine treatment in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the occurrence of in-hospital myocardial infarction, and secondary end points were in-hospital stroke and death. Four observational studies were identified, including 3,220 patients with STEMI. Morphine-treated patients had a higher unadjusted rate of reinfarction compared with patients not receiving morphine (1.5% vs. 0.67%, odds ratio (OR) 2.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-5.21; P = 0.03). Unadjusted mortality rate was lower in morphine-treated patients (1.7% vs. 4.2%, OR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.23-0.81; P = 0.009). Exclusion of the study with baseline differences between groups showed more frequent reinfarction in the morphine group, but this was no longer statistically significant (1.3% vs. 0.5%, OR 2.02; 95% CI, 0.39-10.43; P = 0.40). There was no difference in stroke according to morphine treatment. Patients pretreated with morphine appear to have a higher rate of reinfarction than patients not receiving morphine. This may be attributable to opiate-related delay in P2Y₁₂ inhibitor absorption and resultant delay in onset of platelet inhibition. These concerning findings indicate the need for prospective, randomized trials to assess the impact of opiates on clinical outcomes in STEMI.

Platelet Inhibition With Cangrelor and Crushed Ticagrelor in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

The platelet inhibitory effects induced by oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists are delayed in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI). In turn, this leads to a gap in platelet inhibition, exposing patients to an increased risk of early thrombotic complications and underscoring the need to define strategies associated with more effective platelet inhibition in the peri-primary percutaneous coronary intervention period. Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y₁₂ inhibitor with prompt and potent antiplatelet effects. However, to date, there are limited data on the effects of cangrelor used in combination with ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, questions have emerged on the potential for drug-drug interactions during the transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic study conducted in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=50) who were randomized to treatment with either cangrelor or matching placebo (bolus followed by 2-hour infusion). All patients received ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose administered as crushed tablets at the time of cangrelor/placebo bolus administration. Pharmacodynamic analyses were performed at 8 time points. Pharmacodynamic effects were measured as P2Y₁₂ reaction units by VerifyNow and platelet reactivity index by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, cangrelor was associated with reduced P2Y₁₂ reaction units as early as 5 minutes after bolus, which persisted during the entire duration of drug infusion, including at 30 minutes (63 [32-93] versus 214 [183-245]; mean difference, 152 [95% CI, 108-195]; P<0·001; primary end point). Parallel findings were shown with platelet reactivity index. Accordingly, high on-treatment platelet reactivity rates were reduced with cangrelor. After discontinuation of cangrelor/placebo infusion, there were no differences in levels of platelet reactivity between groups, ruling out a drug-drug interaction when cangrelor and ticagrelor are concomitantly administered.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, cangrelor is an effective strategy to bridge the gap in platelet inhibition associated with the use of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibition induced by ticagrelor. Ticagrelor can be administered as a crushed formulation concomitantly with cangrelor without any apparent drug-drug interaction. The clinical implications of these pharmacodynamic findings warrant investigation in an adequately powered clinical trial.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03247738.

Novel approaches to P2Y12 inhibition and aspirin dosing

Aspirin and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors remain commonly prescribed antiplatelet drugs in the treatment of atherothrombotic conditions. Despite established benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, there remains residual ischemic risk in this group and the problem of bleeding complications is an ongoing issue. DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor has now been studied in other patient groups such as those with concurrent diabetes and stable coronary artery disease, and those undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent trials of ticagrelor monotherapy have suggested this may have benefits over standard-of-care in some settings, such as PCI, but not in others such as peripheral arterial disease or stroke. A novel subcutaneously administered P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, selatogrel, has shown powerful, rapid and consistent effect in a phase 2 study. Aspirin dosing remains an area of investigation, particularly in the setting of DAPT. A novel regimen of very-low-dose twice-daily aspirin has hypothetical advantages in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects, maintaining antiplatelet effect whilst reducing potentially harmful peak-trough variation.

The MOVEMENT Trial

Background

Morphine administration is a strong predictor of delayed onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, likely because of impaired gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone could improve pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine.

Methods and Results

The MOVEMENT (Methylnaltrexone to Improve Platelet Inhibition of Ticagrelor in Morphine‐Treated Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction treated with morphine and ticagrelor. Upon arrival to the catheterization laboratory, patients were randomized to a blinded intravenous injection of either methylnaltrexone (8 or 12 mg according to weight) or 0.9% sodium chloride. The proportion of patients with high on‐treatment platelet reactivity and plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR‐C124910XX were assessed at baseline (arrival in the catheterization laboratory) and 1 and 2 hours later. A total of 82 patients received either methylnaltrexone (n=43) or placebo (n=39). Median (interquartile range) time from ticagrelor administration to randomization was 41 (31–50) versus 45.5 (37–60) minutes (P=0.16). Intravenous methylnaltrexone administration did not significantly affect prevalence of high on‐treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours after inclusion, the primary end point, when compared with placebo (54% versus 51%, P=0.84). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite, the prespecified secondary end points, did not differ significantly between the groups over time. There was no significant difference in patient self‐estimated pain between the groups.

Conclusions

Methylnaltrexone did not significantly improve platelet reactivity or plasma concentrations of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02942550.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Systematic Review

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is defined as a clinically significant change in the exposure and/or response to a drug caused by co-administration of another drug which may result in a precipitation of an adverse event or alteration of its therapeutic effects. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of DDIs that were actually observed or evaluated in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with particular focus on DDIs with clinical relevance. Electronic searches of the literature were conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, EBSCO, Scopus, Google Scholar and SCIndeks. A total of 117 articles were included in the review. This review showed that ACS patients can be exposed to a variety of DDIs with diverse outcomes which include decreased efficacy of antiplatelet drugs, thrombolytics or anticoagulants, increased risk of bleeding, rhabdomyolysis, hepatotoxicity, adverse effects on cardiovascular system (e.g. QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias, excessive bradycardia, severe hypotension), serotonin syndrome and drug-induced fever. Majority of the DDIs involved antiplatelet drugs (e.g. aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor). Evidence of some of the reported DDIs is inconclusive as some of the studies have shown conflicting results. There is a need for additional post-marketing and population-based studies to evaluate the true effects of disease states and other factors on the clinical outcomes of DDIs. Clinicians should be attentive to the potential for DDIs and their associated harm in order to minimize or, if possible, avoid medication-related adverse events in ACS patients.

2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Guidelines on the Acute Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focused Update on Regionalization and Reperfusion

Rapid reperfusion of the infarct-related artery is the cornerstone of therapy for the management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Canada's geography presents unique challenges for timely delivery of reperfusion therapy for STEMI patients. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology STEMI guideline was developed to provide advice regarding the optimal acute management of STEMI patients irrespective of where they are initially identified: in the field, at a non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable centre or at a percutaneous coronary intervention-capable centre. We had also planned to evaluate and incorporate sex and gender considerations in the development of our recommendations. Unfortunately, inadequate enrollment of women in randomized trials, lack of publication of main outcomes stratified according to sex, and lack of inclusion of gender as a study variable in the available literature limited the feasibility of such an approach. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to develop specific evidence-based recommendations for the early identification of STEMI patients, practical aspects of patient transport, regional reperfusion decision-making, adjunctive prehospital interventions (oxygen, opioids, antiplatelet therapy), and procedural aspects of mechanical reperfusion (access site, thrombectomy, antithrombotic therapy, extent of revascularization). Emphasis is placed on integrating these recommendations as part of an organized regional network of STEMI care and the development of appropriate reperfusion and transportation pathways for any given region. It is anticipated that these guidelines will serve as a practical template to develop systems of care capable of providing optimal treatment for a wide range of STEMI patients.