Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Catheter Ablation

State-of-the-art pulsed field ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: ongoing evolution and future perspective

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative approach in the field of cardiac electrophysiology aimed at treating cardiac arrhythmias. Unlike traditional catheter ablation energies, which use radiofrequency or cryothermal energy to create lesions in the heart, PFA utilizes pulsed electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, leading to targeted tissue destruction. This state-of-the-art review summarizes biophysical principles and clinical applications of PFA, highlighting its potential advantages over conventional ablation methods. Clinical data of contemporary PFA devices are discussed, which combine predictable procedural outcomes and a reduced risk of thermal collateral damage. Overall, these technological developments have propelled the rapid evolution of contemporary PFA catheters, with future advancements potentially impacting patient care.

Nitroglycerin to Ameliorate Coronary Artery Spasm During Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

In treating atrial fibrillation, pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has comparable efficacy to conventional thermal ablation, but with important safety advantages: no esophageal injury or pulmonary vein stenosis, and rare phrenic nerve injury. However, when PFA is delivered in proximity to coronary arteries using a pentaspline catheter, which generates a broad electrical field, severe vasospasm can be provoked.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to study the vasospastic potential of a focal PFA catheter with a narrower electrical field and develop a preventive strategy with nitroglycerin.

METHODS

During atrial fibrillation ablation, a focal PFA catheter was used for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Angiography of the right coronary artery (some with fractional flow reserve measurement) was performed before, during, and after PFA. Beyond no nitroglycerin (n = 5), and a few testing strategies (n = 8), 2 primary nitroglycerin administration strategies were studied: 1) multiple boluses (3-2 mg every 2 min) into the right atrium (n = 10), and 2) a bolus (3 mg) into the right atrium with continuous peripheral intravenous infusion (1 mg/min; n = 10).

RESULTS

Without nitroglycerin, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation provoked moderate-severe vasospasm in 4 of 5 (80%) patients (fractional flow reserve 0.71 ± 0.08). With repetitive nitroglycerin boluses, severe spasm did not occur, and mild-moderate vasospasm occurred in only 2 of 10 (20%). Using the bolus + infusion strategy, severe and mild-moderate spasm occurred in 1 and 3 of 10 patients (aggregate 40%). No patient had ST-segment changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a focal PFA catheter routinely provokes right coronary vasospasm. Pretreatment with high doses of parenteral nitroglycerin prevents severe spasm.

Pulsed field ablation versus thermal energy ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural efficiency, safety, and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) induces cell death through electroporation using ultrarapid electrical pulses. We sought to compare the procedural efficiency characteristics, safety, and efficacy of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using PFA compared with thermal energy ablation.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared ablation of AF with PFA versus thermal energy sources. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) 95% CI were measured for continuous variables, where RR < 1 and MD < 0 favor the PFA group.

RESULTS

We included 6 comparative studies for a total of 1012 patients who underwent ablation of AF: 43.6% with PFA (n = 441) and 56.4% (n = 571) with thermal energy sources. There were significantly shorter procedures times with PFA despite a protocolized 20-min dwell time (MD - 21.95, 95% CI - 33.77, - 10.14, p = 0.0003), but with significantly longer fluroscopy time (MD 5.71, 95% CI 1.13, 10.30, p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.59-2.44) or recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.31, 1.34) between the PFA and thermal ablation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with shorter procedural times and longer fluoroscopy times, but no difference in periprocedural complications or rates of recurrent AF when compared to ablation with thermal energy sources. However, larger randomized control trials are needed.

Cardiac blood vessels and irreversible electroporation: findings from pulsed field ablation

The clinical use of irreversible electroporation in invasive cardiac laboratories, termed pulsed field ablation (PFA), is gaining early enthusiasm among electrophysiologists for the management of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmogenic substrates. Though electroporation is regularly employed in other branches of science and medicine, concerns regarding the acute and permanent vascular effects of PFA remain. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the preclinical and adult clinical data published to date on PFA's effects on pulmonary veins and coronary arteries. These data will be contrasted with the incidences of iatrogenic pulmonary vein stenosis and coronary artery injury secondary to thermal cardiac ablation modalities, namely radiofrequency energy, laser energy, and liquid nitrogen-based cryoablation.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation, which delivers microsecond high-voltage electrical fields, may limit damage to tissues outside the myocardium. The efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation as compared with conventional thermal ablation are not known.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we assigned patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to undergo pulsed field ablation or conventional radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation. The primary safety end point included acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients were assigned to undergo pulsed field ablation, and 302 were assigned to undergo thermal ablation. At 1 year, the primary efficacy end point was met (i.e., no events occurred) in 204 patients (estimated probability, 73.3%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 194 patients (estimated probability, 71.3%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -5.2 to 9.2; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999). Primary safety end-point events occurred in 6 patients (estimated incidence, 2.1%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 4 patients (estimated incidence, 1.5%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 0.6 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -1.5 to 2.8; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation receiving a catheter-based therapy, pulsed field ablation was noninferior to conventional thermal ablation with respect to freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation and with respect to device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 1 year. (Funded by Farapulse-Boston Scientific; ADVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04612244.).

Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Preclinical safety and effectiveness of a novel hexaspline ablation catheter

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a nonthermal energy source for cardiac ablation, with potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation.

OBJECTIVE

To report the preclinical results of a novel hexaspline PFA catheter for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and to verify the influence of PFA on esophagus by comparing with RFA.

METHODS

This study included a total of 15 canines for the efficacy and safety study and four swine for the esophageal safety study. The 15 canines were divided into an acute cohort (n = 3), a 30-day follow-up cohort (n = 5) and a 90-day follow-up cohort (n = 7), PVI was performed with the novel hexaspline PFA ablation catheter. In the esophageal safety study, four swine were divided into PFA cohort (n = 2) and RFA cohort (n = 2), esophageal injury swine model was adopted, the esophagus was intubated with an esophageal balloon retractor, under fluoroscopy, the DV8 device was inflated with a mixture of saline and contrast and rotated to displace the esophagus rightward and anteriorly toward the ablation catheter in the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right inferior pulmonary vein (PV). Nine PFA applications were delivered at four locations on IVC and two locations on the right inferior PV in the PFA cohort, six RFA applications were delivered at each location in the RFA group. Histopathological analysis of all PVs, esophagus, IVC, and the adjacent lungs was performed.

RESULTS

Acute PV isolation was achieved in all 15 canines (100%), with energy delivery times of less than 3 min/animal. In the 30 and 90 days group, the overall success rates were 88.9% and 88.5% per PVs, respectively. Two right superior pulmonary veins (RSPVs) in the 30-day group, two RSPVs and one left superior PV in the 90-day group with recovered potentials. At follow-up, gross pathological examination revealed the lesions around the PVs were continuous and transmural. Masson's trichrome staining revealed the myocardial cells in the PVs became fibrotic, but small arteries and nervous tissue were preserved. Results of swine esophageal injury model revealed the esophageal luminal surface was smooth and without evidence for esophageal injury in the PFA group, whereas obvious ulceration was detected on the esophagus tunica mucosa in the RFA group.

CONCLUSION

In the chronic canine study, PFA-based PVI were safe and effective with demonstrable sparing of nerves and venous tissue. Compared with RFA, there was also good evidence for safety of PFA, avoiding PV stenosis and esophageal injury. This preclinical study provided the scientific basis for the first-in-human endocardial PFA studies.

Safety and acute efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation vs thermal energy ablation: A meta-analysis of single proportions

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel energy source for the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using ultrarapid electrical pulses to induce cell death via electroporation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and acute efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA vs thermal energy sources.

Methods

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA and compared them to landmark clinical trials for ablation of AF with thermal energy sources. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to establish variance of raw proportions followed by the inverse with the random-effects model to combine the transformed proportions and generate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We included 24 studies for a total of 5203 patients who underwent AF ablation. Among these patients, 54.6% (n = 2842) underwent PFA and 45.4% (n = 2361) underwent thermal ablation. There were significantly fewer periprocedural complications in the PFA group (2.05%; 95% CI 0.94-3.46) compared to the thermal ablation group (7.75%; 95% CI 5.40-10.47) (P = .001). When comparing AF recurrence up to 1 year, there was a statistically insignificant trend toward a lower prevalence of recurrence in the PFA group (14.24%; 95% CI 6.97-23.35) compared to the thermal ablation group (25.98%; 95% CI 15.75-37.68) (P = .132).

Conclusion

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with lower rates of periprocedural complications and similar rates of acute procedural success and recurrent AF with up to 1 year of follow-up compared to ablation with thermal energy sources.

Catheter-Based Electroporation: A Novel Technique for Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Catheter ablation of arrhythmias is now standard of care in invasive electrophysiology. Current ablation strategies are based on the use of thermal energy. With continuous efforts to optimize thermal energy delivery, effectiveness has greatly improved; however, safety concerns persist. This review focuses on a novel ablation technology, irreversible electroporation (IRE), also known as pulsed-field ablation which may be a safer alternative for arrhythmia management. Pulsed-field ablation is thought to be a nonthermal ablation that applies short-duration high-voltage electrical fields to ablate myocardial tissue with high selectivity and durability while sparing important neighboring structures such as the esophagus and phrenic nerves. There are multiple ongoing studies investigating the potential superior outcomes of IRE compared to radiofrequency ablation in treating patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. In this review, we describe the current evidence of preclinical and clinical trials that have shown promising results of catheter-based IRE.

A Focal Ablation Catheter Toggling Between Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Energy to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Because of its safety, "single-shot" pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheters have been developed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, most atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures are performed with focal catheters to permit flexibility of lesion sets beyond PVI.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a focal ablation catheter able to toggle between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or PFA to treat paroxysmal or persistent AF.

METHODS

In a first-in-human study, a focal 9-mm lattice tip catheter was used for PFA posteriorly and either irrigated RFA (RF/PF) or PFA (PF/PF) anteriorly. Protocol-driven remapping was at ∼3 months postablation. The remapping data prompted PFA waveform evolution: PULSE1 (n = 76), PULSE2 (n = 47), and the optimized PULSE3 (n = 55).

RESULTS

The study included 178 patients (paroxysmal/persistent AF = 70/108). Linear lesions, either PFA or RFA, included 78 mitral, 121 cavotricuspid isthmus, and 130 left atrial roof lines. All lesion sets (100%) were acutely successful. Invasive remapping of 122 patients revealed improvement of PVI durability with waveform evolution: PULSE1: 51%; PULSE2: 87%; and PULSE3: 97%. After 348 ± 652 days of follow-up, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from atrial arrhythmias were 78.3% ± 5.0% and 77.9% ± 4.1% for paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively, and 84.8% ± 4.9% for the subset of persistent AF patients receiving the PULSE3 waveform. There was 1 primary adverse event-inflammatory pericardial effusion not requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation with a focal RF/PF catheter allows efficient procedures, chronic lesion durability, and good freedom from atrial arrhythmias-for both paroxysmal and persistent AF. (Safety and Performance Assessment of the Sphere-9 Catheter and the Affera Mapping and RF/PF Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation; NCT04141007 and NCT04194307).

Pulsed-Field Ablation on Mitral Isthmus in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Preliminary Data on Efficacy and Safety

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a new and promising modality of ablation that has been shown to specifically ablate cardiac tissue while sparing other anatomic structures, thus avoiding thermal ablation-related complications. Recent studies have certified safety and efficacy of PFA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are very limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of PFA ablation of different substrates within the left atrium in the setting of persistent AF.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mitral isthmus (MI) ablation in addition to PVI and posterior wall (PW) ablation with PFA in patients with persistent AF.

METHODS

We prospectively included all consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent a first ablation procedure with PFA. We performed in all these patients a substrate ablation strategy comprising PVI, PW, and MI ablation with the use of PFA only. The primary feasibility endpoint was obtaining a persistent MI block at the end of the procedure. The safety endpoint was a composite of major safety events.

RESULTS

From November 2021 to September 2022, we included 45 patients. Complete MI block was achieved in all 45 (100%). Three patients presented with complications, among them 2 cases (4.4%) of reversible and nonfatal coronary spasm. During a mean follow-up time of 107.8 ± 59.5 days, a 20% recurrence rate was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is a feasible and safe ablation approach for mitral isthmus ablation in addition to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) was recently rediscovered as an emerging treatment modality for the ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Ultra-short high voltage pulses are leading to irreversible electroporation of cardiac cells subsequently resulting in cell death. Current literature of PFA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) consistently reported excellent acute and long-term efficacy along with a very low adverse event rate. The undeniable benefit of the novel ablation technique is that cardiac cells are more susceptible to electrical fields whereas surrounding structures such as the pulmonary veins, the phrenic nerve or the esophagus are not, or if at all, minimally affected, which results in a favorable safety profile that is expected to be superior to the current standard of care without compromising efficacy. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of electroporation are not yet entirely understood on a cellular basis and pulsed electrical field protocols of different manufactures are not comparable among one another and require their own validation for each indication. Importantly, randomized controlled trials and comparative data to current standard of care modalities, such as radiofrequency- or cryoballoon ablation, are still missing. This review focuses on the "pearls" and "pitfalls" of PFA, a technology that has the potential to become the future leading energy source for PVI and beyond.

Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation is a widely used, effective and safe treatment for AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), as a novel energy source for cardiac ablation, has been shown to be tissue selective and is expected to decrease damage to non-cardiac tissue while providing high efficacy in pulmonary vein isolation. The FARAPULSE ablation system (Boston Scientific) follows the idea of single-shot ablation and is the first device approved for clinical use in Europe. Since its approval, multiple high-volume centres have performed increasing numbers of PFA procedures in patients with AF and have published their experiences. This review summarises the current clinical experience regarding the use of PFA for AF using the FARAPULSE system. It provides an overview of its efficacy and safety.

PV Isolation Using a Spherical Array PFA Catheter: Application Repetition and Lesion Durability (PULSE-EU Study)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have revealed that pulsed field ablation (PFA) lesion dimensions increase with repetitive applications at a similar electric field.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability varies with single vs repetitive pulsed field (PF) applications.

METHODS

Atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a spherical multielectrode array PFA catheter delivered with a 19-F deflectable sheath under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and brain magnetic resonance imaging were performed within 1 to 3 days, and invasive remapping at ∼2 to 3 months.

RESULTS

The patient cohort (n = 21; age 63 ± 11 years; 67% women) underwent PVI in either of 2 groups: group 1 (n = 11)-single PF application/PV; and group 2 (n = 10)-3 PF applications/PV. In both groups, PVI was acutely successful in all (100%) patients. Despite significantly longer pulse delivery times (75.2 ± 7.4 s/patient vs 24.5 ± 5.5 s/patient) the procedure times (73.2 ± 13.7 minutes vs 93.7 ± 18.5 minutes) were shorter with group 2 vs group 1. There was no stroke/transient ischemic attack, pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve injury, or esophageal complications. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was normal in both groups of patients (n = 9). Screening brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed asymptomatic cerebral lesions (diffusion weighted imaging+/ fluid attenuated inversion recovery-) in 3 of 16 (18.7%) patients. PV remapping revealed durable PVI in 62.5% PVs in group 1 (n = 10), compared with all 100% PVs in group 2 (n = 9); this translates to all PVs being durably isolated in 30% vs 100% (P < 0.05) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In his first-in-human trial, the "single-shot" spherical array PFA catheter was shown to safely isolate PVs. Repetitive PF application is key for lesion consolidation to maximize PVI durability.

Coronary Arterial Spasm During Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has a unique safety profile when used to treat atrial fibrillation, largely related to its preferentiality for myocardial tissue ablation, in particular, esophageal sparing. A pentaspline catheter was the first such PFA system studied clinically for atrial fibrillation ablation; in these initial regulatory trials, the catheter was used for pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation. Since its regulatory approval in Europe, in clinical practice, physicians have ablated beyond pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation to expanded lesion sets in closer proximity to coronary arteries. This is an unstudied important issue because preclinical and clinical data have raised the potential for coronary arterial spasm. Herein, we studied the vasospastic potential of PFA lesion sets, both remote from and adjacent to coronary arteries.

METHODS

During routine atrial fibrillation ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter, coronary angiography was performed before, during, and after pulsed field applications. The lesion sets studied included: (1) those remote from the coronary arteries such as pulmonary vein isolation (n=25 patients) and left atrial posterior wall ablation (n=5), and (2) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (n=20) that is situated adjacent to the right coronary artery.

RESULTS

During pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation, coronary spasm did not occur, but cavotricuspid isthmus ablation provoked severe subtotal vasospasm in 5 of 5 (100%) consecutive patients, and this was relieved by intracoronary nitroglycerin in 5.5±3.5 minutes. ST-segment elevation was not observed. However, no patient (0%, P=0.004) had severe spasm if first administered parenteral nitroglycerin, either intracoronary (n=5) or intravenous (n=10), before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary vasospasm was not provoked during PFA at locations remote from coronary arteries, but when the energy is delivered adjacent to a coronary artery, PFA routinely provokes subclinical vasospasm. This phenomenon is attenuated by nitroglycerin, administered either post hoc to treat spasm or as prophylaxis.

Improvement in Lesion Formation with Radiofrequency Energy and Utilization of Alternate Energy Sources (Cryoablation and Pulsed Field Ablation) for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

Current ablation systems rely on thermal energy to produce ablation lesions (heating: RF, laser and ultrasound, and cooling: cryo-thermia). While thermal ablation has been proven to be effective, there are several limitations: 1) relatively long procedural times; 2) high recurrence rate of ventricular arrhythmias; and 3) excessive heating potentially leading to serious complications, including steam pop (perforation), coronary arterial injury and thrombo-embolism. Pulsed field ablation (PFA)/irreversible electroporation (IRE) offers a unique non-thermal ablation strategy which has the potential to overcome these limitations. Recent pre-clinical studies suggest that PFA/IRE might be effective and safe for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

Cerebral safety after pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, nonthermal ablation modality that can ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effects on surrounding tissue. Preclinical data show an absence of cerebral emboli after extensive PFA. However, clinical data on silent cerebral lesions (SCLs) and/or silent cerebral events (SCEs) after PFA are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of neurological deficits and SCL and/or SCE after PFA in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA was performed. NIHSS scores were assessed before and 2 days and 30 days after PVI. One day after PVI, patients underwent cerebral 1.5-T MRI scanning using diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences to document the occurrence of SCL/SCE.

RESULTS

PFA was performed in 30 patients (age 63 ± 10 years). No patient showed neurological deficits. All NIHSS scores showed the minimum value of 0. Cerebral MRI scans were normal in 29 of 30 patients (97%). In 1 patient (3%), a single 7-mm cerebellar lesion was observed. Forty days after the procedure, follow-up cerebral MRI scan showed complete regression of the lesion.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with PFA for symptomatic paroxysmal AF, the incidence of MRI-detected asymptomatic thromboembolic cerebral events or lesions was as low as 3%. No neurological deficits occurred in any of the patients.

Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: real-world experience and characterization of the antral lesion size compared with cryoballoon ablation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal technology in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Early investigations have shown a promising safety profile with durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and large antral lesions. However, clinical data remains scarce.

METHODS

We investigated a cohort of 43 patients. Twenty-three patients underwent PVI with PFA in our hospital and we analyzed them with regard to procedural characteristics and with regard to the size of acute antral lesion which was estimated by using an electroanatomical map of the left atrium (LA). We compared these data with data of 20 patients who had undergone cryoballon (CB) PVI in our hospital.

RESULTS

We could show acute isolation of all veins in all patients (100% PFA, 100% CB). Post-ablation high-density mapping revealed no early reconnection (0%). The acute antral lesion size of PFA was significantly higher compared to the CB (67.03 ± 12.69% vs. 57.39 ± 10.91%, p = 0.01). In the PFA group, we found no acute phrenic nerve injury, no major or minor bleeding, and no tamponade but one (4.34%) patient suffered from a stroke. Transient hypotension was observed frequently as well as transient bradycardia or asystole episodes requiring right ventricular pacing. In the CB group, no complications occurred. Furthermore, we discuss practical issues on PFA procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is a promising technology with high acute PV isolation rate and large antral lesions compared to CB. However, larger trials with more patients and data on long-term freedom of AF but also complications are needed.

Pulsed Electrical Field in Arrhythmia Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions

Pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation is a promising novel ablation modality for the treatment of arrhythmia, especially for atrial fibrillation(AF). It relies on electroporation inducing cellular permeabilization by the formation of pores in cell membranes, potentially resulting in cell death. Due to its' non-thermal nature and remarkable tissue selectivity, PEF ablation has be expected largely to replace conventional energy sources, such as radiofrequency (RF) and cryothermy. Up to now, the results in almost all clinical studies of PFA for AF ablation are optimistic, both in terms of effectiveness and safety. The possibility of clinical application of this technology to ventricular tachycardia(VT) has also been supported by several animal models. In this review, we aim to give an overview of the mechanism and technical progress of PFA in cardiac arrhythmia treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is generally performed with multielectrode catheters. Electrode-tissue contact is an important predictor for the success of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation; however, contact force is difficult to measure with multielectrode ablation catheters. In a preclinical study, we assessed the feasibility of a multielectrode impedance system (MEIS) as a predictor of long-term success of PV isolation. In addition, we present the first-in-human clinical experience with MEIS.

METHODS

In 10 pigs, one PV was ablated based on impedance (MEIS group), and the other PV was solely based on local electrogram information (electrophysiological group). IRE ablations were performed at 200 J. After 3 months, recurrence of conduction was assessed. Subsequently, in 30 patients undergoing PV isolation with IRE, MEIS was evaluated and MEIS contact values were compared to local electrograms.

RESULTS

In the porcine study, 43 IRE applications were delivered in 19 PVs. Acutely, no reconnections were observed in either group. After 3 months, 0 versus 3 (P=0.21) PVs showed conduction recurrence in the MEIS and electrophysiological groups, respectively. Results from the clinical study showed a significant linear relation was found between mean MEIS value and bipolar dV/dt (r²=0.49, P<0.001), with a slope of 20.6 mV/s per Ohm.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the animal study suggest that MEIS values predict effective IRE applications. For the long-term success of electrical PV isolation with circular IRE applications, no significant difference in efficacy was found between ablation based on the measurement of electrode interface impedance and ablation using the classical electrophysiological approach for determining electrode-tissue contact. Experiences of the first clinical use of MEIS were promising and serve as an important basis for future research.

Ventricular nanosecond pulsed electric field delivery using active fixation leads: a proof-of-concept preclinical study

BACKGROUND

Mid-myocardial ventricular arrhythmias are challenging to treat. Cardiac electroporation via pulsed electric fields (PEFs) offers significant promise. We therefore tested PEF delivery using screw-in pacemaker leads as proof-of-concept.

METHODS

In 5 canine models, we applied nanosecond PEF (pulse width 300 ns) across the right ventricular (RV) septum using a single lead bipolar configuration (n = 2) and between two leads (n = 3). We recorded electrograms (EGMs) prior to, immediately post, and 5 min after PEF. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and histopathology were performed at 2 weeks and 1 month.

RESULTS

Nanosecond PEF induced minimal extracardiac stimulation and frequent ventricular ectopy that terminated post-treatment; no canines died with PEF delivery. With 1 lead, energy delivery ranged from 0.64 to 7.28 J. Transient ST elevations were seen post-PEF. No myocardial delayed enhancement (MDE) was seen on cMRI. No lesions were noted on the RV septum at autopsy. With 2 leads, energy delivery ranged from 56.3 to 144.9 J. Persistent ST elevations and marked EGM amplitude decreases developed post-PEF. MDE was seen along the septum 2 weeks and 1 month post-PEF. There were discrete fibrotic lesions along the septum; pathology revealed dense connective tissue with < 5% residual cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular electroporation is feasible and safe with an active fixation device. Reversible changes were seen with lower energy PEF delivery, whereas durable lesions were created at higher energies. Central illustration: pulsed electric field delivery into ventricular myocardium with active fixation leads.

Time Course of Irreversible Electroporation Lesion Development Through Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up in Pulsed-Field Ablation-Treated Hearts

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a tissue-selective, nonthermal cardiac ablation modality. A novel PFA ablation system consisted of a multichannel irreversible electroporation generator system and a multielectrode circular irreversible electroporation catheter has been developed for catheter ablation. To understand the progression and immediate impacts of PFA, this study evaluated the subchronic (7±3 day) and chronic (30±3 day) safety and performance of the novel PFA system when simulating pulmonary vein and superior vena cava isolation in a porcine beating heart model.

METHODS

Ten swine models were divided into subchronic (n=6) and chronic cohorts (n=4). Lesions were performed within the right and left atrium to conduct right pulmonary veins and superior vena cava isolations, in addition to creating stacked lesions in the left atrium roof and right atrium posterior wall.

RESULTS

Acute pulmonary vein and superior vena cava isolation were achieved in 10 out of 10 swine and demonstrated 100% lesion durability in both cohorts, including sustained elimination of electrical activity at the left atrium roof and right atrium posterior wall. Histology demonstrated that all the cardiac sites ablated showed discrete zones of loss of myocardial fibers or smooth muscle cells with preservation of the tissue architecture with resultant fibrocellular replacement, neovascularization, and neocollagen deposition. Mineralization findings were present in association with residual necrotic muscle fibers. Only in 7 days group, areas of mineralization were frequently associated with inflammation. There were no treatment-related changes in other tissues, including complete sparing of the phrenic nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsed-field ablation for pulmonary vein and superior vena cava isolation with the novel PFA system was feasible, safe with myocardial-specific ablative effect. Durable lesions were observed at the target areas. with inflammation phenomena mainly documented at 7 days.

Pulsed Field Ablation: a Novel Therapeutic Tool for Catheter-Based Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation becoming increasingly common, the field of electrophysiology is searching for tools to improve procedural efficacy and safety. This review focuses on a novel ablation tool, pulsed field ablation, which promises to push the needle forward. Pulsed field ablation uses high-frequency electrical pulses to ablate cardiac tissue.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown pulsed field ablation offers an efficient means of ablating cardiac tissue with minimal risk of collateral injury. Pulsed field ablation provides a non-thermal means of cardiac tissue ablation with minimal risk of injury to adjacent structures. Future studies will define the optimal current delivery, number of lesions needed to achieve the desired tissue effect, and how best to integrate pulsed field ablation catheters into 3-dimensional mapping systems.

First experience with pulsed field ablation as routine treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) using thermal energy can cause collateral damage. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal energy source. Few small clinical studies have been published. We report on the first 'real-world' experience with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA for paroxysmal AF (PAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pre- and post-ablation, phrenic nerve function was assessed. After high-density left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage mapping, all PVs were individually isolated using a 13 Fr steerable sheath and a pentaspline PFA over-the-wire catheter. After ablation, bipolar voltage mapping was repeated to assess lesion formation. In 30 PAF patients (mean 63 years; 53% female), uncomplicated PFA was performed, with all PVs acutely isolated. The median procedure time was 116 min. The median PFA catheter LA dwell time was 29 min. The median fluoroscopy time was 26 min. In one patient with roof-dependent flutter, a roof line was intentionally created. In two patients, unintentional bidirectional mitral isthmus block was created. There was no phrenic nerve or oesophageal damage. In one patient, pericardial drainage after cardiac tamponade was performed. In-hospital stay and 30-day follow-up were uneventful. After 90 days, 97% of patients were in sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSION

PVI using PFA for PAF in a 'real-world' setting appears to be safe and feasible in this small patient cohort. Procedure times are homogeneous, and LA dwell time is short. Atrial ablation lines can easily be created. Unintentional ablation of atrial tissue can occur, accurate catheter alignment to the PV ostium and axis should be ensured.

In-vivo porcine characterization of atrial lesion safety and efficacy utilizing a circular pulsed-field ablation catheter including assessment of collateral damage to adjacent tissue in supratherapeutic ablation applications

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed field ablation (PFA), an ablative method that causes cell death by irreversible electroporation, has potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was performed in a porcine model to characterize safety and performance of a novel, fully-integrated biphasic PFA system comprising a multi-channel generator, variable loop circular catheter, and integrated PFA mapping software module.

METHODS

Eight healthy porcine subjects were included. To evaluate safety, multiple ablations were performed, including sites not generally targeted for therapeutic ablation, such as the right inferior PV lumen, right superior PV ostium, and adjacent to the esophagus and phrenic nerve. To evaluate efficacy, animals were recovered, followed for 30(±3) days, then re-mapped. Gross pathological and histopathological examinations assessed procedural injuries, chronic thrombosis, tissue ablation, penetration depth, healing, and inflammatory response.

RESULTS

All 8 animals survived follow-up. PV narrowing was not observed acutely nor at follow-up, even when ablation was performed deep to the PV ostium. No injury was seen grossly or histologically in adjacent structures. All PVs were durably isolated, confirmed by bidirectional block at re-map procedure. Histological examination showed complete, transmural necrosis around the circumference of the ablated section of right PVs.

CONCLUSION

This pre-clinical evaluation of a fully-integrated PFA system demonstrated effective and durable ablation of cardiac tissue and PV isolation without collateral damage to adjacent structures, even when ablation was performed in more extreme settings than those used therapeutically. Histological staining confirmed complete transmural cell necrosis around the circumference of the PV ostium at 30 days. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Preclinical Study of Biphasic Asymmetric Pulsed Field Ablation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of pulmonary venous isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation and is featured by tissue-selective ablation. Isolation is achieved via the application of high-voltage microsecond pulses that create irreversible perforations in cell membranes (i.e., electroporation). We proposed a new biphasic asymmetric pulse mode and verified the lesion persistence and safety of this mode for pulmonary vein ostia ablation in preclinical studies. We found that biphasic asymmetric pulses can effectively reduce muscle contractions and drop ablation threshold. In the electroanatomic mapping, the ablation site showed a continuous low potential area, and the atrium was not captured after 30 days of pacing. Pathological staining showed that cardiomyocytes in the ablation area were replaced by fibroblasts and there was no damage outside the ablation zone. Our results show that pulmonary venous isolation using the biphasic asymmetric discharge mode is safe, durable, effective, and causes no damage to other tissues.

Pulsed Field Ablation: a New Paradigm for Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current ablation approach for arrhythmias relies upon the use of radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation catheters. Although there have been significant advances both in catheter design and in energy delivery approaches, limitations such as suboptimal efficacy and safety remain. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel approach to ablation that is distinct from RF and cryoablation by virtue of selective ablation of myocardial tissue. Preclinical and clinical reports have demonstrated lesion durability with an excellent safety profile. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective randomized trials that are currently ongoing. In this review, we describe efficacy and safety outcomes from both pre-clinical and clinical studies that have been performed so far and briefly discuss ongoing clinical trials and future investigations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from pre-clinical and clinical research have shown PFA as a promising tool for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. In addition to safety regarding mitigating the risk to surrounding structures such as the phrenic nerve, esophagus, PFA also offers an effective method for ablation. In this review, we summarize the currently published pre-clinical and clinical data evaluating the safety and efficacy of PFA for cardiac arrhythmias.

[Pulsed field ablation : The ablation technique of the future?]

The ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is now standard therapy in invasive electrophysiology with a focus on atrial fibrillation due to its high prevalence. Thermal energy sources such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are the most commonly used techniques to date. Due to limitations in terms of effectiveness and safety because of possible indiscriminate tissue destruction, ablation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) can be a safe and effective alternative to thermal ablation techniques. This is a nonthermal form of energy that creates effective myocardial lesions by means of irreversible electroporation by generating short, high-energy electrical impulses. Preliminary data show high effectiveness with a low complication rate. Myocardial tissue shows a high specificity while sparing surrounding structures such as the esophagus, the phrenic nerve and surrounding vascular structures. Therefore, irreversible electroporation is a very promising technique and has the potential to become the perfect form of energy for many catheter ablations and especially for pulmonary vein isolation. In this article we provide an overview of the current status of PFA as well as an outlook on future fields of treatment.

First-in-Human Experience and Acute Procedural Outcomes Using a Novel Pulsed Field Ablation System: The PULSED AF Pilot Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel form of ablation using electrical fields to ablate cardiac tissue. There are only limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of this type of ablation in humans.

Methods:

PULSED AF (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT04198701) is a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter, global, premarket clinical study. The first-in-human pilot phase evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using a novel PFA system delivering bipolar, biphasic electrical fields through a circular multielectrode array catheter (PulseSelect; Medtronic, Inc). Thirty-eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were treated in 6 centers in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands. The primary outcomes were ability to achieve acute pulmonary vein isolation intraprocedurally and safety at 30 days.

Results:

Acute electrical isolation was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins (n=152) in the 38 patients. Skin-to-skin procedure time was 160±91 minutes, left atrial dwell time was 82±35 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 28±9 minutes. No serious adverse events related to the PFA system occurred in the 30-day follow-up including phrenic nerve injury, esophageal injury, stroke, or death.

Conclusions:

In this first-in-human clinical study, 100% pulmonary vein isolation was achieved using only PFA with no PFA system–related serious adverse events.

Graphic Abstract:

A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Establishing Irreversible Electroporation Electric Field Potential Threshold in A Suspension In Vitro Model for Cardiac and Neuronal Cells

Aims: Irreversible electroporation is an ablation technique being adapted for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Currently, there are many differences reported in the in vitro and pre-clinical literature for the effective voltage threshold for ablation. The aim of this study is a direct comparison of different cell types within the cardiovascular system and identification of optimal voltage thresholds for selective cell ablation. Methods: Monophasic voltage pulses were delivered in a cuvette suspension model. Cell viability and live–dead measurements of three different neuronal lines, cardiomyocytes, and cardiac fibroblasts were assessed under different voltage conditions. The immediate effects of voltage and the evolution of cell death was measured at three different time points post ablation. Results: All neuronal and atrial cardiomyocyte lines showed cell viability of less than 20% at an electric field of 1000 V/cm when at least 30 pulses were applied with no significant difference amongst them. In contrast, cardiac fibroblasts showed an optimal threshold at 1250 V/cm with a minimum of 50 pulses. Cell death overtime showed an immediate or delayed cell death with a proportion of cell membranes re-sealing after three hours but no significant difference was observed between treatments after 24 h. Conclusions: The present data suggest that understanding the optimal threshold of irreversible electroporation is vital for achieving a safe ablation modality without any side-effect in nearby cells. Moreover, the evolution of cell death post electroporation is key to obtaining a full understanding of the effects of IRE and selection of an optimal ablation threshold.

Catheter Ablation in Persistent AF, the Evolution towards a More Pragmatic Strategy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and represents a heterogeneous disorder with a complex pathological basis. While significant technological advances have taken place over the last decade in the field of catheter ablation of AF, response to ablation varies and long-term success rates in those with persistent AF remain modest. Mechanistic studies have highlighted potentially different sustaining factors for AF in the persistent AF population with substrate-driven focal and re-entrant sources in the body of the atria identified on invasive and non-invasive mapping studies. Translation to clinical practice, however, remains challenging and the application of such mapping techniques to clinical ablation has yet to demonstrate a significant benefit beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in the persistent AF cohort. Recent advances in catheter and ablation technology have centered on improving the durability of ablation lesions at index procedure and although encouraging results have been demonstrated with early studies, large-scale trials are awaited. Further meaningful improvement in clinical outcomes in the persistent AF population requires ongoing advancement in the understanding of AF mechanisms, coupled with continuing progress in catheter technology capable of delivering durable transmural lesions.

Pulsed field catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation (CA) has become the mainstay therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) the most frequently used treatment strategy. Although several energy sources have been tested (including radiofrequency, cryothermal and laser), these are not devoid of safety issues and in many instances effectiveness is dependent on operator experience. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel energy source by which high-voltage electric pulses are used to create pores in the cellular membrane (i.e., electroporation), leading to cellular death. The amount of energy required to produce irreversible electroporation is highly tissue dependent. In consequence, a tailored protocol in which specific targeting of the atrial myocardium is achieved while sparing adjacent tissues is theoretically feasible, increasing the safety of the procedure. While large scale clinical trials are lacking, current clinical evidence has demonstrated significant efficacy in achieving durable PVI without ablation related adverse events.

In vivo analysis of the origin and characteristics of gaseous microemboli during catheter-mediated irreversible electroporation

Aims 

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is a non-thermal ablation method based on the application of direct current between a multi-electrode catheter and skin electrode. The delivery of current through blood leads to electrolysis. Some studies suggest that gaseous (micro)emboli might be associated with myocardial damage and/or (a)symptomatic cerebral ischaemic events. The aim of this study was to compare the amount of gas generated during IRE ablation and during radiofrequency (RF) ablation.

Methods and results

In six 60–75 kg pigs, an extracorporeal femoral shunt was outfitted with a bubble-counter to detect the size and total volume of gas bubbles. Anodal and cathodal 200 J IRE applications were delivered in the left atrium (LA) using a 14-electrode circular catheter. The 30 and 60 s 40 W RF point-by-point ablations were performed. Using transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), gas formation was visualized. Average gas volumes were 0.6 ± 0.6 and 56.9 ± 19.1 μL (P < 0.01) for each anodal and cathodal IRE application, respectively. Also, qualitative TOE imaging showed significantly less LA bubble contrast with anodal than with cathodal applications. Radiofrequency ablations produced 1.7 ± 2.9 and 6.7 ± 7.4 μL of gas, for 30 and 60 s ablation time, respectively.

Conclusion 

Anodal IRE applications result in significantly less gas formation than both cathodal IRE applications and RF applications. This finding is supported by TOE observations.

Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Energy Sources Here to Stay

Energy sources used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have undergone an exceptional journey over the past 50 years. Traditional energy sources, such as radiofrequency and cryoablation, have been the mainstay of AF ablation. Novel investigations have led to inclusion of other techniques, such as laser, high-frequency ultrasound, and microwave energy, in the armamentarium of electrophysiologists. Despite these modalities, AF has remained one of the most challenging arrhythmias. Advances in the understanding of electroporation promise to overcome the shortcomings of conventional energy sources. A thorough understanding of the biophysics and practical implications of the existing energy sources is paramount.

Ablation Modalities for Therapeutic Intervention in Arrhythmia-Related Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on Electroporation

Targeted cellular ablation is being increasingly used in the treatment of arrhythmias and structural heart disease. Catheter-based ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered a safe and effective approach for patients who are medication refractory. Electroporation (EPo) employs electrical energy to disrupt cell membranes which has a minimally thermal effect. The nanopores that arise from EPo can be temporary or permanent. Reversible electroporation is transitory in nature and cell viability is maintained, whereas irreversible electroporation causes permanent pore formation, leading to loss of cellular homeostasis and cell death. Several studies report that EPo displays a degree of specificity in terms of the lethal threshold required to induce cell death in different tissues. However, significantly more research is required to scope the profile of EPo thresholds for specific cell types within complex tissues. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablative approach appears to overcome the significant negative effects associated with thermal based techniques, particularly collateral damage to surrounding structures. With further fine-tuning of parameters and longer and larger clinical trials, EPo may lead the way of adapting a safer and efficient ablation modality for the treatment of persistent AF.

Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events.

BACKGROUND

PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA.

METHODS

In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).

Pulsed field ablation: a promise that came true

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulsed field ablation is a nonthermal ablative modality that uses short living, strong electrical field created around catheter to create microscopic pores in cell membranes (electroporation). When adequately dosed/configured it shows a preference for myocardial tissue necrosis. Thus, it holds a promise to become a 'perfect' energy source for cardiac ablation to treat arrhythmias. Herein, we present update on platforms in clinical development.

RECENT FINDINGS

First in human series using pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation ablation have been completed and data published for several platforms. Acute safety outcomes are similar across the platforms with exceptionally low rate of those complications that are typically reported for thermal ablation methods (esophageal injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve palsy). Promising acute data on pulmonary vein isolation had been corroborated with satisfactory 1-year clinical follow-up for a single platform, whereas reports are pending for the rest. Research efforts are being expanded to a development of focal catheters, and therefore, pulsed field ablation application for ventricular arrhythmias.

SUMMARY

As the reports confirming its safety and efficacy build up, there seems to be no way that the promise of pulsed field ablation could end in a blind alley.

In Vitro Cell Selectivity of Reversible and Irreversible: Electroporation in Cardiac Tissue

[Figure: see text].

Safety and chronic lesion characterization of pulsed field ablation in a Porcine model

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been identified as an alternative to thermal‐based ablation systems for treatment of atrial fibrillation patients. The objective of this Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) study was to characterize the chronic effects and safety of overlapping lesions created by a PFA system at intracardiac locations in a porcine model.

Methods

A circular catheter with nine gold electrodes was used for overlapping low‐ or high‐dose PFA deliveries in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial appendage (RAA), and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) in six pigs. Electrical isolation was evaluated acutely and chronic lesions were assessed via necropsy and histopathology after 4‐week survival. Acute and chronic safety data were recorded peri‐ and post‐procedurally.

Results

No animal experienced ventricular arrhythmia during PFA delivery, and there was no evidence of periprocedural PFA‐related adverse events. Lesions created in all anatomies resulted in electrical isolation postprocedure. Lesions were circumferential, contiguous, and transmural, with all converting into consistent lines of chronic replacement fibrosis, regardless of trabeculated or smooth endocardial surface structure. Ablations were non‐thermally generated with only minimal post‐delivery temperature rises recorded at the electrodes. There was no evidence of extracardiac damage, stenosis, aneurysms, endocardial disruption, or thrombus.

Conclusion

PFA deliveries to the SVC, RAA, and RSPV resulted in complete circumferential replacement fibrosis at 4‐week postablation with an excellent chronic myocardial and collateral tissue safety profile. This GLP study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a dosage range in preparation for a clinical trial and characterized the non‐thermal nature of PFA.

Absence of (sub-)acute cerebral events or lesions after electroporation ablation in the left-sided canine heart

BACKGROUND

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablation modality. A 200-J application can create deep myocardial lesions, but gas bubbles are created at the ablation electrode. Cerebral effects of these bubbles are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate gas microemboli-induced brain lesions after IRE and radiofrequency (RF) ablation to the left side of the canine heart, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathology.

METHODS

In 11 canines, baseline cerebral MRI scans were performed. In 9 animals, after retrograde femoral artery access, 12 ± 4 200-J IRE applications were administered in the ascending aorta. In 2 animals, 30 minutes of irrigated 30-W RF ablation using 10-30g of contact force was applied in the left ventricle. At days 1 and 5 after ablation, MRI was repeated. The brain tissue then was histopathologically examined.

RESULTS

All ablations and follow-up were uneventful. Intracardiac echography confirmed gas bubble formation after each IRE application. Neurologic examination was normal. MRI scans were normal in all animals at day 1 and were normal in 10 of 11 animals at day 5. In 1 animal, a single <2-mm-diameter lesion in the right temporal region could not be excluded as a small infarct or early hemorrhagic site. Histopathologic analysis of the same region showed no pathologic changes. In all other animals, gross and microscopic pathology were normal.

CONCLUSION

MRI images alone or in combination with histologic follow-up did not reveal treatment-related embolic events. Gross and microscopic pathology did not reveal evidence of treatment-related embolic events. IRE seems to be a safe ablation modality for the brain.

AC Pulsed Field Ablation Is Feasible and Safe in Atrial and Ventricular Settings: A Proof-of-Concept Chronic Animal Study

Introduction

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) exploits the delivery of short high-voltage shocks to induce cells death via irreversible electroporation. The therapy offers a potential paradigm shift for catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmia. We designed an AC-burst generator and therapeutic strategy, based on the existing knowledge between efficacy and safety among different pulses. We performed a proof-of-concept chronic animal trial to test the feasibility and safety of our method and technology.

Methods

We employed 6 female swine - weight 53.75 ± 4.77 kg - in this study. With fluoroscopic and electroanatomical mapping assistance, we performed ECG-gated AC-PFA in the following settings: in the left atrium with a decapolar loop catheter with electrodes connected in bipolar fashion; across the interventricular septum applying energy between the distal electrodes of two tip catheters. After procedure and 4-week follow-up, the animals were euthanized, and the hearts were inspected for tissue changes and characterized. We perform finite element method simulation of our AC-PFA scenarios to corroborate our method and better interpret our findings.

Results

We applied square, 50% duty cycle, AC bursts of 100 μs duration, 100 kHz internal frequency, 900 V for 60 pulses in the atrium and 1500 V for 120 pulses in the septum. The inter-burst interval was determined by the native heart rhythm - 69 ± 9 bpm. Acute changes in the atrial and ventricular electrograms were immediately visible at the sites of AC-PFA - signals were elongated and reduced in amplitude (p < 0.0001) and tissue impedance dropped (p = 0.011). No adverse event (e.g., esophageal temperature rises or gas bubble streams) was observed - while twitching was avoided by addition of electrosurgical return electrodes. The implemented numerical simulations confirmed the non-thermal nature of our AC-PFA and provided specific information on the estimated treated area and need of pulse trains. The postmortem chest inspection showed no peripheral damage, but epicardial and endocardial discolorations at sites of ablation. T1-weighted scans revealed specific tissue changes in atria and ventricles, confirmed to be fibrotic scars via trichrome staining. We found isolated, transmural and continuous scars. A surviving cardiomyocyte core was visible in basal ventricular lesions.

Conclusion

We proved that our method and technology of AC-PFA is feasible and safe for atrial and ventricular myocardial ablation, supporting their systematic investigation into effectiveness evaluation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Further optimization, with energy titration or longer follow-up, is required for a robust atrial and ventricular AC-PFA.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Single Pulse Irreversible Electroporation

Background:

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising new nonthermal ablation technology for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Experimental data suggest that IRE ablation produces large enough lesions without the risk of PV stenosis, artery, nerve, or esophageal damage. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of single pulse IRE PV isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods:

Ten patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation underwent single pulse IRE PV isolation under general anesthesia. Three-dimensional reconstruction and electroanatomical voltage mapping (EnSite Precision, Abbott) of left atrium and PVs were performed using a conventional circular mapping catheter. PV isolation was performed by delivering nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic 6 ms, 200 J direct current IRE applications via a custom nondeflectable 14-polar circular IRE ablation catheter with a variable hoop diameter (16–27 mm). A deflectable sheath (Agilis, Abbott) was used to maneuver the ablation catheter. A minimum of 2 IRE applications with slightly different catheter positions were delivered per vein to achieve circular tissue contact, even if PV potentials were abolished after the first application. Bidirectional PV isolation was confirmed with the circular mapping catheter and a post ablation voltage map. After a 30-minute waiting period, adenosine testing (30 mg) was used to reveal dormant PV conduction.

Results:

All 40 PVs could be successfully isolated with a mean of 2.4±0.4 IRE applications per PV. Mean delivered peak voltage and peak current were 2154±59 V and 33.9±1.6 A, respectively. No PV reconnections occurred during the waiting period and adenosine testing. No periprocedural complications were observed.

Conclusions:

In the 10 patients of this first-in-human study, acute bidirectional electrical PV isolation could be achieved safely by single pulse IRE ablation.

Reduction in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis and Collateral Damage With Pulsed Field Ablation Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Canine Model

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a highly morbid condition that can result after catheter ablation for PV isolation. We hypothesized that pulsed field ablation (PFA) would reduce PV stenosis risk and collateral injury compared with irrigated radiofrequency ablation (IRF).

METHODS

IRF and PFA deliveries were randomized in 8 dogs with 2 superior PVs ablated using one technology and 2 inferior PVs ablated using the other technology. IRF energy (25-30 W) or PFA was delivered (16 pulse trains) at each PV in a proximal and in a distal site. Contrast computed tomography scans were collected at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12-week (termination) time points to monitor PV cross-sectional area at each PV ablation site.

RESULTS

Maximum average change in normalized cross-sectional area at 4-weeks was -46.1±45.1% post-IRF compared with -5.5±20.5% for PFA (P≤0.001). PFA-treated targets showed significantly fewer vessel restrictions compared with IRF (P≤0.023). Necropsy showed expansive PFA lesions without stenosis in the proximal PV sites, compared with more confined and often incomplete lesions after IRF. At the distal PV sites, only IRF ablations were grossly identified based on focal fibrosis. Mild chronic parenchymal hemorrhage was noted in 3 left superior PV lobes after IRF. Damage to vagus nerves as well as evidence of esophagus dilation occurred at sites associated with IRF. In contrast, no lung, vagal nerve, or esophageal injury was observed at PFA sites.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA significantly reduced risk of PV stenosis compared with IRF postprocedure in a canine model. IRF also caused vagus nerve, esophageal, and lung injury while PFA did not.

Development of adaptive resistance to electric pulsed field treatment in CHO cell line in vitro

Pulsed electric field treatment has increased over the last few decades with successful translation from in vitro studies into different medical treatments like electrochemotherapy, irreversible electroporation for tumor and cardiac tissue ablation and gene electrotransfer for gene therapy and DNA vaccination. Pulsed electric field treatments are efficient but localized often requiring repeated applications to obtain results due to partial response and recurrence of disease. While these treatment times are several orders of magnitude lower than conventional biochemical treatment, it has been recently suggested that cells may become resistant to electroporation in repetitive treatments. In our study, we evaluate this possibility of developing adaptive resistance in cells exposed to pulsed electric field treatment over successive lifetimes. Mammalian cells were exposed to electroporation pulses for 30 generations. Every 5th generation was analyzed by determining permeabilization and survival curve. No statistical difference between cells in control and cells exposed to pulsed electric field treatment was observed. We offer evidence that electroporation does not affect cells in a way that they would become less susceptible to pulsed electric field treatment. Our findings indicate pulsed electric field treatment can be used in repeated treatments with each treatment having equal efficiency to the initial treatment.

Emerging Technologies for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Electrically isolating the pulmonary veins from the left atrium by catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for maintaining sinus rhythm, but its success varies depending on multiple factors, including arrhythmic burden. Although procedural outcomes have improved over the years, further gains are limited by a seemingly zero-sum relationship between effectiveness and safety, which is largely a product of the available technologies. Current energies used to create contiguous, transmural, and durable atrial lesions can result in serious complications if they reach the esophagus or phrenic nerve, for instance—structures that can be adjacent to the atrial myocardium, often within millimeters of the energy source. Consequently, high rates of pulmonary vein-left atrium reconnections are consistently seen in clinical studies and in clinical practice as operators appropriately forgo ablation effectiveness to protect patients from harm. However, as ablative technologies evolve to circumvent this stalemate, safer, and more effective pulmonary vein isolation seems increasingly realistic. Furthermore, the innovative nature of these technologies raises the prospect of markedly improved procedural efficiency, which could increase patient comfort, reduce operator occupational injuries, and enhance the use of health resources—all of which are increasingly important considerations particularly as the demand for catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation continues to rise. We herein review 3 promising candidate ablation technologies with the potential to revolutionize the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: electroporation (pulsed-field ablation), expandable lattice-tip radiofrequency ablation/electroporation, and ultra-low temperature cryoablation.

Lattice-Tip Focal Ablation Catheter That Toggles Between Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Energy to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

Background:

The tissue selectivity of pulsed field ablation (PFA) provides safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation in treating atrial fibrillation. One-shot PFA catheters have been shown capable of performing pulmonary vein isolation, but not flexible lesion sets such as linear lesions. A novel lattice-tip ablation catheter with a compressible 9-mm nitinol tip is able to deliver either focal radiofrequency ablation or PFA lesions, each in 2 to 5 s.

Methods:

In a 3-center, single-arm, first-in-human trial, the 7.5F lattice catheter was used with a custom mapping system to treat paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Toggling between energy sources, point-by-point pulmonary vein encirclement was performed using biphasic PFA posteriorly and either temperature-controlled irrigated radiofrequency ablation or PFA anteriorly (RF/PF or PF/PF, respectively). Linear lesions were created using either PFA or radiofrequency ablation.

Results:

The 76-patient cohort included 55 paroxysmal and 21 persistent atrial fibrillation patients undergoing either RF/PF (40 patients) or PF/PF (36 patients) ablation. The pulmonary vein isolation therapy duration time (transpiring from first to last lesion) was 22.6±8.3 min/patient, with a mean of 50.1 RF/PF lesions/patient. Linear lesions included 14 mitral (4 RF/2 RF+PF/8 PF), 34 left atrium roof (12 RF/22 PF), and 44 cavotricuspid isthmus (36 RF/8 PF) lines, with therapy duration times of 5.1±3.5, 1.8±2.3, and 2.4±2.1 min/patient, respectively. All lesion sets were acutely successful, using 4.7±3.5 minutes of fluoroscopy. There were no device-related complications, including no strokes. Postprocedure esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed minor mucosal thermal injury in 2 of 36 RF/PF and 0 of 24 PF/PF patients. Postprocedure brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed diffusion-weighted imaging+/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery- and diffusion-weighted imaging+/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery+ asymptomatic lesions in 5 and 3 of 51 patients, respectively.

Conclusions:

A novel lattice-tip catheter could safely and rapidly ablate atrial fibrillation using either a combined RF/PF approach (capitalizing on the safety of PFA and the years of experience with radiofrequency energy) or an entirely PF approach.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT04141007 and NCT04194307.

Focal Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Linear Atrial Lesions: A Preclinical Assessment of Safety and Durability

BACKGROUND

A novel ablation and mapping system can toggle between delivering biphasic pulsed field (PF) and radiofrequency energy from a 9-mm lattice-tip catheter. We assessed the preclinical feasibility and safety of (1) focal PF-based thoracic vein isolation and linear ablation, (2) combined PF and radiofrequency focal ablation, and (3) PF delivered directly atop the esophagus.

METHODS

Two cohorts of 6 swine were treated with pulsed fields at low dose (PF_LD) and high dose (PF_HD) and followed for 4 and 2 weeks, respectively, to isolate 25 thoracic veins and create 5 right atrial (PF_LD), 6 mitral (PF_HD), and 6 roof lines (radiofrequency+PF_HD). Baseline and follow-up voltage mapping, venous potentials, ostial diameters, and phrenic nerve viability were assessed. PF_HD and radiofrequency lesions were delivered in 4 and 1 swine from the inferior vena cava onto a forcefully deviated esophagus. All tissues were submitted for histopathology.

RESULTS

Hundred percent of thoracic veins (25 of 25) were successfully isolated with 12.4±3.6 applications/vein with mean PF times of <90 seconds/vein. Durable isolation improved from 61.5% PF_LD to 100% with PF_HD (P=0.04), and all linear lesions were successfully completed without incurring venous stenoses or phrenic injury. PF_HD sections had higher transmurality rates than PF_LD (98.3% versus 88.1%; P=0.03) despite greater mean thickness (2.5 versus 1.3 mm; P<0.001). PF lesions demonstrated homogenous fibrosis without epicardial fat, nerve, or vessel involvement. In comparison, radiofrequency+PF_HD sections revealed similar transmurality but expectedly more necrosis, inflammation, and epicardial fat, nerve, and vessel involvement. Significant ablation-related esophageal necrosis, inflammation, and fibrosis were seen in all radiofrequency sections, as compared with no PF sections.

CONCLUSIONS

The lattice-tip catheter can deliver focal PF to durably isolate veins and create linear lesions with excellent transmurality and without complications. The PF lesions did not damage the phrenic nerve, vessels, and the esophagus.