Long-Term Outcome in High-Risk Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy After Primary Prevention Defibrillator Implants

New Insights and Recommendations for Athletes With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has long been considered to be a high-risk cardiac condition for which exercise was thought to increase the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This was founded in part by initial autopsy studies reporting HCM to be a leading medical cause of SCD among young athletes. Most forms of competitive sport and exercise were therefore thought to increase the risk of SCD to a prohibitive level. Resultant expert consensus guideline recommendations universally restricted athletes with HCM from participation in moderate- to vigourous-intensity sport and exercise in a binary "yes" or "no" clinical decision making process with the goal of reducing the risk of sports-related SCD. HCM is, however, a heterogeneous genetic condition with variable penetrance and risk. The degree to which sports and exercise increases the risk of SCD at an individual patient level continues to be an area of clinical uncertainty. Emerging data and clinical experience from the past several decades have provided important new insights into exercise-related risks and have brought into question the appropriateness of overly restrictive binary clinical decision making for exercise recommendations in HCM. This includes an improved understanding of the overall prevalence of HCM in the general population, improved observational estimates of the risk of SCD related to continued sport and exercise participation, and a general shift toward improved patient-centred approaches to care through shared decision making processes. The rules by which the game is played may be changing for athletes with HCM.

Gene Therapy in Cardiology: Is a Cure for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on the Horizon?

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic cardiomyopathy worldwide, affecting approximately 1 in 500 individuals. Current therapeutic interventions include lifestyle optimisation, medications, septal reduction therapies, and, rarely, cardiac transplantation. Advances in our understanding of disease-causing genetic variants in HCM and their associated molecular mechanisms have led to the potential for targeted therapeutics and implementation of precision and personalised medicine. Results from preclinical research are promising and raise the question of whether cure of some subtypes of HCM may be possible in the future. This review provides an overview of current genetic therapy platforms, including 1) genome editing, 2) gene replacement, 3) allelic-specific silencing, and 4) signalling pathway modulation. The current applicability of each of these platforms within the paradigm of HCM is examined, with updates on current and emerging trials in each domain. Barriers and limitations within the current landscape are also highlighted. Despite recent advances, translation of genetic therapy for HCM to clinical practice is still in early development. In realising the promises of genetic HCM therapies, ethical and equitable access to safe gene therapy must be prioritised.

Interventions in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common genetically transmitted cardiomyopathy that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite contemporary treatments and interventions, the management of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains poorly defined compared with other branches of cardiology. In this review, we discuss established and novel therapeutic interventions in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a focus on percutaneous and surgical strategies including surgical myectomy, mitral valve repair or replacement, percutaneous alcohol septal ablation, pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, septal embolization, radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation, and percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation.

The Paradigm of Sudden Death Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common and, often, inherited cardiac disease, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and, perhaps, most visibly as a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young. However, HCM is now more accurately considered a treatable disease with management options that significantly alter its clinical course. This is particularly true for SCD because the penetration of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators into HCM practice enables primary prevention device therapy that reliably terminates potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3% to 4%/year). This therapeutic advance is largely responsible for >10-fold decrease in the overall disease-related mortality to 0.5%/year, independent of patient age. A guideline-based clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, which included variables identifiable with cardiac magnetic resonance: ≥1 risk markers judged major within the clinical profile of an individual patient, associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making, can be sufficient to consider the recommendation of a prophylactic defibrillator implant. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decisions using the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association traditional major risk marker strategy are associated with a 95% sensitivity for identifying those patients who subsequently experience appropriate therapy, albeit often 5 to 10+ years after implant but without heart failure deterioration or death after a device intervention. A mathematical SCD risk score proposed by European Society of Cardiology is associated with a relatively low sensitivity (33%) for predicting and preventing SCD events but with potential for less device overtreatment.

The challenge of risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical, genetic and imaging insights from a quaternary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the commonest genetic cardiomyopathy and may result in sudden cardiac death (SCD). Clinical risk stratification scores are utilised to estimate SCD risk and determine potential utility of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCM from a quaternary HCM service were defined according to clinical characteristics, genetic profiles and cardiac imaging results. European Risk-SCD score and American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Score were calculated. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

380 patients with HCM were followed up for a median of 6.4 years. 18 patients (4.7%) experienced cardiac arrest, with predictive factors being younger age (37.2 vs 54.4 years, p = 0.0041), unexplained syncope (33.3% vs 9.4%, p = 0.007), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (50.0% vs 12.7%, p < 0.0001), increased septal thickness (21.5 vs 17.5 mm, p = 0.0003), and presence of a sarcomeric gene mutation (100.0% vs 65.8%, p = 0.038). The Risk-SCD and AHA/ACC scores had poor agreement (kappa coefficient 0.38). Risk-SCD score had poor sensitivity (44.4%), classifying 55.6% of patients with cardiac arrest as low-risk but was highly specific (93.7%). AHA/ACC risk score did not discriminate between groups significantly. 20 patients (5.3%) died, with most >60-year-olds having a non-cardiac cause of death (p = 0.0223).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights limited (38%) agreement between the Risk-SCD and AHA/ACC scores. Most cardiac arrests occurred in ostensibly low or medium-risk patients under both scores. Appropriate ICD selection remains challenging. Incorporating newer risk markers such as HCM genotyping and myocardial fibrosis quantification by cardiac MRI may assist future risk refinement.

Art and science of risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Current state, unknowns, and future directions

The progress in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) over the last several decades has resulted in great improvements in quality of life and overall survival for HCM patients. Yet, sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is among the common causes of HCM-related mortality. SCD risk stratification is a central and often challenging domain in the care of the HCM patient. Distinguishing the individuals most likely to benefit from a primary prevention implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) from those truly at a low risk of SCD in whom an ICD is not necessary is a nuanced process. Clinicians need to carefully balance the potential benefit and risks of ICDs, particularly in young patients. Because of intense investigations in diverse HCM cohorts globally, two main approaches to SCD risk stratification in HCM have emerged, one based on major SCD risk factors and one based on a mathematically derived risk score. In this overview, we discuss the current state, latest advances and remaining unknowns about established and novel markers of risk of SCD in HCM. We also review how the risk factor- and risk score-based assessments can and should be used in conjunction to enhance rather than contradict each other in facilitating informed ICD decision-making in contemporary clinical practice.

Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a transvenous or subcutaneous defibrillator

AIMS

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator complications are of concern. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) does not use transvenous leads and is expected to reduce complications. However, it does not provide bradycardia and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). The aim of this study was to compare appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions, complications, disease-related adverse events and mortality between HCM patients implanted with a S- or transvenous (TV)-ICD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive HCM patients implanted with a S- (n = 216) or TV-ICD (n = 211) were enrolled. Propensity-adjusted cumulative Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare 5-year event-free survival and the risk of events. The S-ICD patients had lower 5-year risk of appropriate (HR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65; P = 0.002) and inappropriate (HR: 0.44; 95%CI: 0.20-0.95; P = 0.038) ICD interventions, driven by a high incidence of ATP therapy in the TV-ICD group. The S- and TV-ICD patients experienced similar 5-year rate of device-related complications, albeit the risk of major lead-related complications was lower in S-ICD patients (HR: 0.17; 95%CI: 0.038-0.79; P = 0.023). The TV- and S-ICD patients displayed similar risk of disease-related complications (HR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.27-1.52; P = 0.309) and mortality (HR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.29-1.87; P = 0.521).

CONCLUSION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a S-ICD had lower 5-year risk of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies as well as of major lead-related complications as compared to those implanted with a TV-ICD. Long-term comparative follow-up studies will clarify whether the lower incidence of major lead-related complications will translate into a morbidity or survival benefit.

Analysis of risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Dilemmas and clarity

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been considered the most common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. However, introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in HCM has proved highly effective and the mainstay of preventing SD in children, adolescents, and adults by terminating malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Nevertheless, ICD decision making is generally regarded as more difficult in pediatrics, and the strategy for selecting ICD patients from this population remains without consensus. Prospective studies in HCM children and adolescents have shown the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology traditional major risk marker strategy to be reliable with >90% sensitivity in selecting patients for SD prevention. International data in >2000 young HCM patients assembled over 20 years who were stratified by major risk markers showed ICDs effectively prevented SD in 20%. Alternatively, novel quantitative risk scoring initiatives provide 5-year risk estimates that are potentially useful as adjunctive tools to facilitate discussion of prophylactic ICD risks vs benefit but are as yet unsupported by prospective outcome studies. Risk scoring strategies are characterized by reasonable discriminatory statistical power (C-statistic 0.69-0.76) for identifying patients with SD events but with relatively low sensitivity, albeit with specificity comparable with the risk marker strategy. While some reticence for obligating healthy-appearing young patients to lifelong device implants is understandable, underutilization of the ICD in high-risk children and adolescents can represent a lost opportunity for fulfilling the long-standing aspiration of SD prevention. This review provides a critical assessment of the current strengths and weaknesses of SD risk stratification strategies in young HCM patients in an effort to clarify clinical decision making in this challenging subpopulation.

Development of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent transformational technology, arguably the most significant advance in cardiovascular medicine in 50 years. The vision and determination of pioneers Mirowski and Mower was fundamental to this monumental achievement, working with limited resources and confronted by skepticism/criticism from medical establishment. The inventors were followed >35 years in which a multitude of innovative clinical scientists and engineers introduced technological advances leading to the sophisticated devices in practice today. A pivotal patient experiment with automated termination of ventricular fibrillation (1980) led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Transvenous lead systems converted ICDs from thoracotomy-based secondary prevention to primary prevention of sudden death devices in countless patients worldwide. ICD acceptance was solidified by prospective randomized controlled trials showing reduced mortality superior to antiarrhythmic drugs. ICDs eventually expanded from coronary disease to inherited arrhythmia conditions (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The ICD breakthrough story demonstrates how significant progress is possible in medicine against all odds, given fearless imagination to pursue novel ideas that conflict with accepted wisdom.

Differing strategies for sudden death prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sudden death (SD) has traditionally been the most visible and feared complication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Substantial progress in reducing the occurrence of these catastrophic events represents a new paradigm in disease management. Prevention of SD in HCM has resulted from introduction of primary prevention ICDs that reliably terminate life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, as well as a matured risk stratification algorithm capable of reliably identifying those patients at highest risk. This initiative has been a major determinant of reducing HCM-related mortality to a low rate of 0.5%/year. In such a heterogeneous heart disease as HCM, no perfect risk stratification strategy is possible, and available approaches differ in terms of sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with SD risk. Major cardiovascular societies, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology in the USA and European Society of Cardiology in Europe have promoted different risk stratification guidelines creating the potential for judging SD risk in a given HCM patient differently based on commitment to a particular societal guideline or country of residence. In this review, we provide a critical but balanced assessment of these two divergent SD prevention strategies with regard to their respective strengths and weaknesses, as a guide to clinicians directly engaged in this important management issue.

Usefulness of insertable cardiac monitors for risk stratification: current indications and clinical evidence

INTRODUCTION

The 2018 ESC Syncope guidelines expanded the indications for an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) to patients with unexplained syncope and primary cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders.

AREAS COVERED

This review article discusses the clinical evidence for using an ICM for risk stratification in different patient populations including Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, and congenital heart disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical data on the usefulness of ICMs in different patient populations is limited but most studies demonstrate early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias, such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation. It is important to emphasize that the study populations usually comprise selected populations where conventional diagnostic methods fail to clarify the mechanism of symptoms. The effect of an ICM on prognosis by earlier detection of arrhythmias is difficult to demonstrate in populations with rare disease. Risk stratification in patients with cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders remains a niche indication for ICMs. The most important indication for an ICM remains unexplained syncope in patients at low risk of SCD. Given the device costs and uncertain clinical value of device-detected arrhythmias, it is unclear whether it is also useful in non-syncopal patients.

Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Arrest After Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: ASA-SCARRE Risk Score

This study aimed to derive a new score, the Alcohol Septal Ablation-Sudden Cardiac ARREst (ASA-SCARRE) risk score, that can be easily used to evaluate the risk of sudden cardiac arrest events (sudden cardiac death, resuscitation, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge) after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. We analyzed 1,834 patients from the Euro-ASA registry (49% men, mean age 57 ± 14 years) who were followed up for 5.0 ± 4.3 years (9,202 patient-years) after ASA. A total of 65 patients (3.5%) experienced sudden cardiac arrest events, translating to 0.72 events per 100 patient-years. The independent predictors of sudden cardiac arrest events were septum thickness before ASA (hazard ratio 1.09 per 1 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.14, p <0.001) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at the last clinical checkup (hazard ratio 1.01 per 1 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.02, p = 0.002). The following ASA-SCARRE risk scores were derived and independently predicted long-term risk of sudden cardiac arrest events: "0" for both LVOT gradient <30 mmHg and baseline septum thickness <20 mm; "1" for LVOT gradient ≥30 mm Hg or baseline septum thickness ≥20 mm; and "2" for both LVOT gradient ≥30 mm Hg and baseline septum thickness ≥20 mm. The C statistic of the ASA-SCARRE risk score was 0.684 (SE 0.030). In conclusion, the ASA-SCARRE risk score may be a useful and easily available clinical tool to predict risk of sudden cardiac arrest events after ASA in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Concepts and Therapies

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a relatively common, globally distributed, and often inherited myocardial disorder, transformed over the last several years into a treatable condition with the emergence of effective management options that alter natural history at all ages. Now available are a matured risk stratification algorithm selecting patients for prophylactic implantable defibrillators that prevent arrhythmic sudden death; low-risk, high-benefit surgical myectomy to reverse progressive heart failure symptoms due to left ventricular outflow obstruction; anticoagulation prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation-mediated embolic stroke; and heart transplant for refractory end-stage disease in the absence of obstruction. Those strategies have resulted in reduction of HCM-related morbidity and reduction of mortality to 0.5% per year.

Arrhythmia monitoring for risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy, presenting significant clinical heterogeneity. Arrhythmia risk stratification and detection are critical components in the evaluation and management of all cases of HCM. The 2020 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology HCM guidelines provide new recommendations for periodic 24-48-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring to screen for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. A strategy of more frequent or prolonged monitoring would lead to earlier arrhythmia recognition and the potential for appropriate treatment. However, whether such a strategy in patients with HCM results in improved outcomes is not yet established. The available evidence, knowledge gaps, and potential merits of such an approach are reviewed. Cardiac implantable electronic devices provide an opportunity for early arrhythmia detection, with the potential to enable early management strategies in order to improve outcomes.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The Times They Are a-Changin'

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at high risk of sudden cardiac death. The heterogeneity of clinical scenarios in HCM and the availability of ICDs with distinct characteristics emphasizes the need for selecting the right device for the right patient. There is growing awareness that unnecessarily complex devices can lead to short- and long-term complications without adding significant clinical benefits. Young patients have the greatest potential years of life gained from the ICD but are also most exposed to device-related complications. This increases the complexity of decision-making of ICD prescription in these often otherwise well patients in whom device selection should be tailored to preserve survival benefit without introducing morbidity. In the light of the multiple clinical phenotypes characterizing HCM, the present article offers evidence-based perspectives helpful in predicting the individual impact of the ICD and choosing the most appropriate device.

Importance of Newer Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Based Risk Markers for Sudden Death Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy:An International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The sudden death (SD) risk stratification algorithm in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has evolved, underscored recently by novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based risk markers: LV apical aneurysm, extensive late gadolinium enhancement and end-stage with systolic dysfunction, incorporated into 2020 AHA/ACC HCM Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the specific impact of newer predominantly CMR-based risk markers in a large multicenter HCM population that underwent primary prevention ICD implants METHODS: Longitudinal study of 1149 consecutive HCM patients from 6 North American and European HCM centers prospectively judged to be at high SD risk based on ≥ 1 AHA/ACC individual risk markers and prophylactically implanted with ICDs. ESC risk score was retrospectively analyzed with respect to the known clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of 1149 patients with ICDs, 162 (14%) experienced device therapy terminating VT/VF 4.6 ± 4.2 years after implant. CMR-based markers solely or in combination led to ICD implantation in 49 of the 162 patients (30%) experiencing device-therapy. Particularly low ESC scores (<4%/5-years) would have excluded an ESC-ICD recommendation for 67 patients who nevertheless experienced appropriate ICD therapy included 26 with the CMR-based risk markers not part of the ESC formula.

CONCLUSION

The identification and incorporation of novel guideline-supported CMR-based risk markers enhances selection of HCM patients for SD prevention with ICDs. Absence of CMR-based markers from the ESC risk score in part accounts for it not identifying many HCM patients with SD events. These data support inclusion of CMR as a routine part of HCM patient evaluation and risk stratification.

Evolution of risk stratification and sudden death prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Twenty years with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common inherited myocardial disorder, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and most visibly as a common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. Over the last several years, HCM has been transformed into a contemporary treatable disease with management options that significantly alter clinical course. With the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in the HCM patient population, a new paradigm has emerged, with primary prevention device therapy reliably terminating potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3%-4% per year) and being largely responsible for a >10-fold decrease in disease-related mortality (to 0.5% per year), independent of age. An evidenced-based and guideline directed clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, including variables identified with cardiac magnetic resonance. One or more risk markers judged major and relevant within a patient's clinical profile can be considered sufficient to recommend a primary prevention implant (associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making). ICD decisions using the prospective individual risk marker strategy have been associated with 95% sensitivity for identifying patients who subsequently experienced appropriate ICD therapy, (albeit often delayed substantially for >5 or >10 years after implant), but without heart failure deterioration or HCM death following device intervention. A rigid mathematically derived statistical risk model proposed by the European Society of Cardiology is associated with low sensitivity (ie, 33%) for predicting SD events. Introduction of prophylactically inserted ICDs to HCM 20 years ago has significantly altered the clinical course and landscape of this disease. SD prevention has reduced HCM mortality significantly, making preservation of life and the potential for normal longevity a reality for most patients.