Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Favorable impact of FFRCT on myocardial revascularization outcomes: Results from an observational real-world registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) strategy significantly decreases unnecessary invasive coronary angiography and refines the appropriateness of revascularization decision. The present study aimed to evaluate how FFRCT guided - strategy impacts outcomes postrevascularization.

METHODS

We included patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD in a registry from 2013 to 2021. FFRCT entered Heart-Team decision from 2017. Propensity score adjusted Cox - and logistic - regression analyzed FFRCT's impact on post- revascularization major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and myocardial injury (PMI).

RESULTS

Among 7541 patients, 1601 had suspected OCAD. 559 patients underwent revascularization: 69.0 % PCI, 29.7 % CABG and 1.2 % both. 252(45.1 %) patients underwent FFRCT. Over 4.4 ± 2.2 years, 137(24.5 %) patients experienced MACE. FFRCT was associated with a trend toward reduced MACE (HR 0.736, 95 % CI 0.513-1.055, p = 0.095) and significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.476, 95 % CI 0.230-0.985, p = 0.046). In the post-2017 cohort (413 patients, follow-up 3.7 ± 1.5 years), FFRCT significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.610, 95 % CI 0.390-0.954, P = 0.030) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.285, 95 % CI 0.104-0.779, P = 0.014). In CABG patients, FFRCT was associated with lower PMI incidence (5.3 % vs. 15.6 %, p = 0.044). Multivariable analysis revealed no significant association between FFRCT use and PMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Revascularization decision-making with FFRCT translates into better post-revascularization outcomes, primarily by reducing MACE through lower mortality. There was no clear impact on PMI. These findings suggests that FFRCT's value lies indeed in improving patient selection for revascularization, but warrants further confirmation in randomized clinical trials.

Cardiac computed tomography: Current practice, guidelines, applications, and prospects

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has evolved significantly as a critical tool in diagnosing and managing cardiac diseases, greatly facilitated by technological advancements in multidetector systems, dose-reduction techniques, and sophisticated imaging algorithms. This article discusses the historical progression and technological evolution in cardiac CT (CCT), focusing on the impact of 64-multidetector row CT and dual-energy CT systems on improving spatial and temporal resolutions and reducing radiation exposure. It explores the role of these technologies in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, such as through detailed three-dimensional reconstructions and minimized imaging artifacts. Furthermore, it highlights the integration of machine learning to automate complex imaging analysis and photon-counting CT, which promises higher resolution and further dose reduction. Prospective studies and ongoing trials such as FASTTRACK coronary artery bypass grafting also underscore the potential of advanced CT technologies in refining procedural planning and execution. The continuous advancements in detector technology, computational techniques, and image reconstruction are poised to expand the applications and efficacy of CCT, cementing its role in modern cardiology.

Clinical Applications of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease

Computer tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) represents a significant advancement in noninvasive cardiac functional assessment. This technology uses computer simulation and anatomical information from computer tomography of coronary angiogram to calculate the CT-FFR value at each point within the coronary vasculature. These values serve as a critical reference for cardiologists in making informed treatment decisions and planning. Emerging evidence suggests that CT-FFR has the potential to enhance the specificity of computer tomography of coronary angiogram, thereby reducing the need for additional diagnostic examinations such as invasive coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. This could result in savings in financial cost, time, and resources for both patients and health care providers. However, it is important to note that although CT-FFR holds great promise, there are limitations to this technology. Users should be cautious of common pitfalls associated with its use. A comprehensive understanding of these limitations is essential for effectively applying CT-FFR in clinical practice.

Utility of Cardiovascular CT in Ischemic Heart Disease

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has acquired a pivotal role in modern cardiology. It represents the gold standard for noninvasive coronary imaging. Moreover, CCTA permits a comprehensive evaluation of atheromatic burden and plaque composition. This study aims to review the impact of CCTA across the different presentations of ischemic heart disease, from primary prevention to the evaluation of patients requiring revascularization.

Role of physiology in the management of multivessel disease among patients with acute coronary syndrome

Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50% stenosis in 2 or more epicardial arteries, is associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. A salient challenge for managing this cohort is selecting the optimal revascularisation strategy, for which the use of coronary physiology has been increasingly recognised. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive, pressure wire-based, physiological index measuring the functional significance of coronary lesions. Understanding this can help practitioners evaluate which lesions could induce myocardial ischaemia and, thus, decide which vessels require urgent revascularisation. Non-hyperaemic physiology-based indices, such as instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), provide valid alternatives to FFR. While FFR and iFR are recommended by international guidelines in stable CAD, there is ongoing discussion regarding the role of physiology in patients with ACS and multivessel disease (MVD); growing evidence supports FFR use in the latter. Compelling findings show FFR-guided complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can reduce adverse cardiovascular events, mortality, and repeat revascularisations in ACS and MVD patients compared to angiography-based PCI. However, FFR is limited in identifying non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques, which can disadvantage high-risk patients. Here, integrating coronary physiology assessment with intracoronary imaging in decision-making can improve outcomes and quality of life. Further research into novel physiology-based tools in ACS and MVD is needed. This review aims to highlight the key evidence surrounding the role of FFR and other functional indices in guiding PCI strategy in ACS and MVD patients.

Pre-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Computed Tomography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Predicts Graft Failure: Implications for Planning Invasive Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a pre-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) coronary computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) result at the site of a future anastomosis would predict the graft failure in patients undergoing CABG.

METHODS

In 43 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) prior to the CABG, follow-up CCTA were acquired >12 months post-CABG procedure. The FFR-CT values were simulated on the basis of the pre-CABG CCTA. Based on follow-up CCTA, the anastomosis sites and the graft patency were determined. The graft failure was defined as either its stenosis >50% or occlusion.

RESULTS

Ninety eight (44 saphenous, 54 left or right internal mammary artery) grafts were assessed. Eighteen grafts from 16 patients were dysfunctional on follow-up CCTA. The FFR-CT values at the location of future anastomosis were higher in dysfunctional than in normal grafts (0.77 [0.71-0.81] vs 0.60 [0.56-0.66], respectively, P = 0.0007). Pre-CABG FFR-CT (hazard ratio = 1.1; 95% CI: 1.012-1.1, P = 0.0230), and bypass graft to right coronary artery (hazard ratio = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.4-9.3 vs left anterior descending artery) were independent predictors of graft dysfunction during follow-up. The optimal threshold of FFR-CT to predict graft failure was >0.68 (sensitivity 88.9% (95% CI: 65.3-98.6), specificity 63.7% (95% CI: 52.2-74.2), positive predictive value 35.6% (95% CI: 28.3%-43.5%), negative predictive value 96.2% (95% CI: 87.2%-99.0%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-CABG functional FFR-CT predicts future coronary bypass graft failure. This shows utility of FFR-CT for guiding coronary revascularization and also suggests significance of physiological assessment prior to CABG.

Charting the Unseen: How Non-Invasive Imaging Could Redefine Cardiovascular Prevention

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a major global health challenge, leading to significant morbidity and mortality while straining healthcare systems. Despite progress in medical treatments for CVDs, their increasing prevalence calls for a shift towards more effective prevention strategies. Traditional preventive approaches have centered around lifestyle changes, risk factors management, and medication. However, the integration of imaging methods offers a novel dimension in early disease detection, risk assessment, and ongoing monitoring of at-risk individuals. Imaging techniques such as supra-aortic trunks ultrasound, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and coronary computed tomography angiography have broadened our understanding of the anatomical and functional aspects of cardiovascular health. These techniques enable personalized prevention strategies by providing detailed insights into the cardiac and vascular states, significantly enhancing our ability to combat the progression of CVDs. This review focuses on amalgamating current findings, technological innovations, and the impact of integrating advanced imaging modalities into cardiovascular risk prevention, aiming to offer a comprehensive perspective on their potential to transform preventive cardiology.

The Role of Multimodality Imaging (CT & MR) as a Guide to the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes

Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is one of the leading cardiovascular causes of morbidity, mortality, and use of medical resources. After the introduction by international guidelines of the same level of recommendation to non-invasive imaging techniques in CCS evaluation, a large debate arose about the dilemma of choosing anatomical (with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)) or functional imaging (with stress echocardiography (SE), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), or nuclear imaging techniques) as a first diagnostic evaluation. The determinant role of the atherosclerotic burden in defining cardiovascular risk and prognosis more than myocardial inducible ischemia has progressively increased the use of a first anatomical evaluation with CCTA in a wide range of pre-test probability in CCS patients. Functional testing holds importance, both because the role of revascularization in symptomatic patients with proven ischemia is well defined and because functional imaging, particularly with stress cardiac magnetic resonance (s-CMR), gives further prognostic information regarding LV function, detection of myocardial viability, and tissue characterization. Emerging techniques such as stress computed tomography perfusion (s-CTP) and fractional flow reserve derived from CT (FFRCT), combining anatomical and functional evaluation, appear capable of addressing the need for a single non-invasive examination, especially in patients with high risk or previous revascularization. Furthermore, CCTA in peri-procedural planning is promising to acquire greater importance in the non-invasive planning and guiding of complex coronary revascularization procedures, both by defining the correct strategy of interventional procedure and by improving patient selection. This review explores the different roles of non-invasive imaging techniques in managing CCS patients, also providing insights into preoperative planning for percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization.

Coronary bypass surgery guided by computed tomography in a low-risk population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In patients with three-vessel disease and/or left main disease, selecting revascularization strategy based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has a high level of virtual agreement with treatment decisions based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

METHODS

In this study, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures were planned based on CCTA without knowledge of ICA. The CABG strategy was recommended by a central core laboratory assessing the anatomy and functionality of the coronary circulation. The primary feasibility endpoint was the percentage of operations performed without access to the ICA. The primary safety endpoint was graft patency on 30-day follow-up CCTA. Secondary endpoints included topographical adequacy of grafting, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular (MACCE), and major bleeding events at 30 days. The study was considered positive if the lower boundary of confidence intervals (CI) for feasibility was ≥75% (NCT04142021).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 114 patients with a mean (standard deviation) anatomical SYNTAX score and Society of Thoracic Surgery score of 43.6 (15.3) and 0.81 (0.63), respectively. Unblinding ICA was required in one case yielding a feasibility of 99.1% (95% CI 95.2%-100%). The concordance and agreement in revascularization planning between the ICA- and CCTA-Heart Teams was 82.9% with a moderate kappa of 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.66) and between the CCTA-Heart Team and actual treatment was 83.7% with a substantial kappa of 0.61 (95% CI 0.53-0.68). The 30-day follow-up CCTA in 102 patients (91.9%) showed an anastomosis patency rate of 92.6%, whilst MACCE was 7.2% and major bleeding 2.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG guided by CCTA is feasible and has an acceptable safety profile in a selected population of complex coronary artery disease.

Innovations in cardiac computed tomography: Imaging in coronary artery disease

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal tool in the non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent advancements in imaging techniques, quantitative plaque assessment methods, assessment of coronary physiology, and perivascular coronary inflammation have propelled CCTA to the forefront of CAD management, enabling precise risk stratification, disease monitoring, and evaluation of treatment response. However, challenges persist, including the need for cardiovascular outcomes data for therapy modifications based on CCTA findings and the lack of standardized quantitative plaque assessment techniques to establish universal guidelines for treatment strategies. This review explores the current utilization of CCTA in clinical practice, highlighting its clinical impact and discussing challenges and opportunities for future development. By addressing these nuances, CCTA holds promise for revolutionizing coronary imaging and improving CAD management in the years to come. Ultimately, the goal is to provide precise risk stratification, optimize medical therapy, and improve cardiovascular outcomes while ensuring cost-effectiveness for healthcare systems.

A simple coronary CT angiography-based jeopardy score for the identification of extensive coronary artery disease: Validation against invasive coronary angiography

PURPOSE

The invasive British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Jeopardy Score (iBCIS-JS) is a simple angiographic scoring system, enabling quantification of the extent of jeopardized myocardium related to clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the coronary CT angiography-based BCIS-JS (CT-BCIS-JS) against the iBCIS-JS in patients with suspected or stable CAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent coronary CT angiography followed by invasive coronary angiography, within 90 days were retrospectively included. CT-BCIS-JS and iBCIS-JS were calculated, with a score ≥ 6 indicating extensive CAD. Correlation between the CT-BCIS-JS and iBCIS-JS was searched for using Spearman's coefficient, and agreement with weighted Kappa (κ) analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were included. There were 102 men and 20 women with a median age of 62 years (Q1, Q3: 54, 68; age range: 19-83 years). No differences in median CT-BCIS-JS (4; Q1, Q3: 0, 8) and median iBCIS-JS (4; Q1, Q3: 0, 8) were found (P = 0.18). Extensive CAD was identified in 53 (43.4%) and 52 (42.6%) patients using CT-BCIS-JS and iBCIS-JS, respectively (P = 0.88). CT-based and iBCIS-JS showed excellent correlation (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) and almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.97). Agreement for identification of an iBCIS-JS ≥ 6 was almost perfect (κ = 0.94; 95 % confidence interval: 0.87-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The CT-BCIS-JS represents a feasible, and accurate method for quantification of CAD, with capabilities not different from those of iBCIS-JS. It enables simple, non-invasive identification of patients with anatomically extensive CAD.

Computed Tomography-Derived Physiology Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization.

CAROTIDSCORE.RU-The first Russian computer program for risk stratification of postoperative complications of carotid endarterectomy

GOAL

Presentation of the first Russian computer program (www.carotidscore.ru) for risk stratification of postoperative complications of carotid endarterectomy (CEE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study is based on the analysis of a multicenter Russian database that includes 25,812 patients after CEE operated on from 01/01/2010 to 04/01/2022. The following types of CEE were implemented: 6814 classical CEE with plastic reconstruction of the reconstruction zone with a patch; 18,998 eversion CEE.

RESULTS

In the hospital postoperative period, 0.18% developed a lethal outcome, 0.14%-myocardial infarction, 0.35%-stroke. The combined endpoint was 0.68%. For each factor present in patients, a predictive coefficient was calculated. The prognostic coefficient was a numerical indicator reflecting the strength of the influence of each factor on the development of postoperative complications. Based on this formula, predictive coefficients were calculated for each factor present in patients in our study. The total contribution of these factors was reflected in "%" and denoted the risk of postoperative complications with a minimum value of 0% and a maximum of 100%. On the basis of the obtained calculations, a computer program CarotidSCORE was created. Its graphical interface is based on the QT framework (https://www.qt.io), which has established itself as one of the best solutions for desktop applications. It is possible not only to calculate the probability of developing a complication, but also to save all data about the patient in JSON format (for the patient's personal card and his anamnesis). The CarotidSCORE program contains 47 patient parameters, including clinical-demographic, anamnestic and angiographic characteristics. It allows you to choose one of the four types of CEE, which will provide an accurate stratification of the risk of complications for each of them in person.

CONCLUSION

CarotidSCORE (www.carotidscore.ru) is able to determine the likelihood of postoperative complications in patients undergoing CEE.

Derivation and validation of a novel functional FFRCT score incorporating the burden of coronary stenosis severity and flow impairment to predict clinical events

BACKGROUND

A score combining the burden of stenosis severity on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and flow impairment by fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) may be a better predictor of clinical events than either parameter alone.

METHODS

The Functional FFRCT Score (FFS) combines CCTA and FFRCT parameters in an allocated point-based system. The feasibility of the FFS was assessed in cohort of 72 stable chest pain patients with matched CCTA and FFRCT datasets. Validation was performed using 2 cohorts: (a) 4468 patients from the ADVANCE Registry to define its association with revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); (b) 212 patients from the FORECAST trial to determine predictors of MACE.

RESULTS

The median calculation time for the FFS was 10 (interquartile range 6-17) seconds, with strong intra-operator and inter-operator agreement (Cohen's Kappa 0.89 (±0.37, p ​< ​0.001) and 0.83 (±0.04, p ​< ​0.001, respectively). The FFS correlated strongly with both the CT-SYNTAX and the Functional CT-SYNTAX scores (rS ​= ​0.808 for both, p ​< ​0.001). In the ADVANCE cohort the FFS had good discriminatory abilities for revascularization with an area under the curve of 0.82, 95 ​% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.84, p ​< ​0.001. Patients in the highest FFS tertile had significantly higher rates of revascularization (61 ​% vs 5 ​%, p ​< ​0.001) and MACE (1.9 ​% vs 0.5 ​%, p ​= ​0.001) compared with the lowest FFS tertile. In the FORECAST cohort the FFS was an independent predictor of MACE at 9-month follow-up (hazard ratio 1.04, 95 ​% CI 1.01-1.08, p ​< ​0.01).

CONCLUSION

The FFS is a quick-to-calculate and reproducible score, associated with revascularization and MACE in two distinct populations of stable symptomatic patients.

Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in CAD Risk Stratification and Revascularization Planning

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional stress testing is frequently used to assess for coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic, stable patients with low to intermediate pretest probability. However, patients with highly vulnerable plaque may have preserved luminal patency and, consequently, a falsely negative stress test. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged at the forefront of primary prevention screening and has excellent agency in ruling out obstructive CAD with high negative predictive value while simultaneously characterizing nonobstructive plaque for high-risk features, which invariably alters risk-stratification and pre-procedural decision making.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the literature detailing the utility of CCTA in its ability to risk-stratify patients with CAD based on calcium scoring as well as high-risk phenotypic features and to qualify the functional significance of stenotic lesions.

SUMMARY

Calcium scores ≥ 100 should prompt consideration of statin and aspirin therapy. Spotty calcifications < 3 mm, increased non-calcified plaque > 4 mm3 per mm of the vessel wall, low attenuation < 30 HU soft plaque and necrotic core with a rim of higher attenuation < 130 HU, and a positive remodeling index ratio > 1.1 all confer additive risk for acute plaque rupture when present. Elevations in the perivascular fat attenuation index > -70.1 HU are a strong predictor of all-cause mortality and can further the risk stratification of patients in the setting of a non-to-minimal plaque burden. Lastly, a CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) < 0.75 or values from 0.76 to 0.80 in conjunction with additional risk factors is suggestive of flow-limiting disease that would benefit from invasive testing. The wealth of information available through CCTA can allow clinicians to risk-stratify patients at elevated risk for an acute ischemic event and engage in advanced revascularization planning.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology

The clinical value of fractional flow reserve and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios are well established in determining an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, over the last 5 years we have witnessed a shift towards the use of physiology to enhance procedural planning, assess post-PCI functional results, and guide PCI optimisation. In this regard, clinical studies have reported compelling data supporting the use of longitudinal vessel analysis, obtained with pressure guidewire pullbacks, to better understand how obstructive CAD contributes to myocardial ischaemia, to establish the likelihood of functionally successful PCI, to identify the presence and location of residual flow-limiting stenoses and to predict long-term outcomes. The introduction of new functional coronary angiography tools, which merge angiographic information with fluid dynamic equations to deliver information equivalent to intracoronary pressure measurements, are now available and potentially also applicable to these endeavours. Furthermore, the ability of longitudinal vessel analysis to predict the functional results of stenting has played an integral role in the evolving field of simulated PCI. Nevertheless, it is important to have an awareness of the value and challenges of physiology-guided PCI in specific clinical and anatomical contexts. The main aim of this European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions clinical consensus statement is to offer up-to-date evidence and expert opinion on the use of applied coronary physiology for procedural PCI planning, disease pattern recognition and post-PCI optimisation.

Utility of FFRCT in Patients with Chest Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this article is to review the data supporting the use of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) in patients with chest pain.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be improved with the use of FFRCT, primarily due to its superior specificity when compared to CCTA alone. This promising development may help reduce the need for invasive angiography in patients presenting with chest pain. Furthermore, some studies have indicated that incorporating FFRCT into decision-making is safe, with an FFRCT value of ≥ 0.8 being associated with favorable outcomes. While FFRCT has been shown to be feasible in patients with acute chest pain, further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm its utility. The emergence of FFRCT as a tool for the management of patients with chest pain is promising. However, potential limitations require the interpretation of FFRCT in conjunction with clinical context.

Coronary CT-based FFR in patients with acute myocardial infarction might predict follow-up invasive FFR: The XPECT-MI study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate whether invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRi) of non-infarction related (non-IRA) lesions changes over time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Moreover, we assessed the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography-derived FFR(FFRCT) following the index event in predicting follow-up FFRi.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 38 STEMI patients (mean age 61.6 ​± ​9 years, 23.1% female) who underwent non-IRA baseline and follow-up FFRi measurements and a baseline FFRCT (within ≤10 days after STEMI). Follow-up FFRi was performed at 45-60 days (FFRi and FFRCT value of ≤0.8 was considered positive).

RESULTS

FFRi values showed significant difference between baseline and follow-up (median and interquartile range (IQR) 0.85 [0.78-0.92] vs. 0.81 [0.73-0.90] p ​= ​0.04, respectively). Median FFRCT was 0.81 [0.68-0.93]. In total, 20 lesions were positive on FFRCT. A stronger correlation and smaller bias were found between FFRCT and follow-up FFRi (ρ ​= ​0.86,p ​< ​0.001,bias:0.01) as compared with baseline FFRi (ρ ​= ​0.68, p ​< ​0.001,bias:0.04). Comparing follow-up FFRi and FFRCT, no false negatives but two false positive cases were found. The overall accuracy was 94.7%, with sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 90.0% for identifying lesions ≤0.8 on FFRi. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 81.5%, 93.3%, and 73.9%, respectively, for identifying significant lesions on baseline FFRi using index FFRCT.

CONCLUSION

FFRCT in STEMI patients close to the index event could identify hemodynamically relevant non-IRA lesions with higher accuracy than FFRi measured at the index PCI, using follow-up FFRi as the reference standard. Early FFRCT in STEMI patients might represent a new application for cardiac CT to improve the identification of patients who benefit most from staged non-IRA revascularization.

10 Years of SYNTAX: Closing an Era of Clinical Research After Identifying New Outcome Determinants

The SYNTAX trial randomized patients equally eligible for coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention using the Heart Team approach. The SYNTAXES study achieved a follow-up rate of 93.8% and reported the 10-year vital status. Factors associated with increased mortality at 10 years were pharmacologically treated diabetes mellitus, increased waist circumference, reduced left ventricular function, prior cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease, western Europe and North American descent, current smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, elevated C-reactive protein, anemia, and an increase in HbA1c. Procedural factors associated with higher 10 years mortality include periprocedural myocardial infarction, extensive stenting, small stents, ≥1 heavily calcified lesion, ≥1 bifurcation lesion, residual SYNTAX score >8, and staged percutaneous coronary intervention. Optimal medical therapy at 5 years, use of statins, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, multiple arterial grafts, and higher physical component score and mental component score were associated with lower mortality at 10 years. Numerous scores and prediction models were developed to help individualize risk assessment. Machine learning has emerged as a novel approach for developing risk models.

Optimal Measurement Sites of Coronary-Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Insight From China CT-FFR Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimal measurement site of coronary-computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the whole clinical routine practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 396 CAD patients who underwent coronary-computed tomography angiography, FFR CT , and invasive FFR. FFR CT was measured at 1 cm (FFR CT -1 cm), 2 cm (FFR CT -2 cm), 3 cm (FFR CT -3 cm), and 4 cm (FFR CT -4 cm) distal to coronary stenosis, respectively. FFR CT and invasive FFR ≤0.80 were defined as lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of FFR CT to detect ischemia was obtained using invasive FFR as the reference standard. Reduced invasive coronary angiography rate and revascularization efficiency were calculated. After a median follow-up of 35 months in 267 patients for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), Cox hazard proportional models were performed with FFR CT values at each measurement site.

RESULTS

For discriminating lesion-specific ischemia, the areas under the curve of FFR CT -1 cm (0.91) as well as FFR CT -2 cm (0.91) were higher than those of FFR CT -3 cm (0.89) and FFR CT -4 cm (0.88), respectively (all P <0.05). The higher reduced invasive coronary angiography rate (81.6%) was found at FFR CT -1 cm than FFR CT -2 cm (81.6% vs. 62.6%, P <0.05). Revascularization efficiency did not differ between FFR CT -1 cm and FFR CT -2 cm (80.8% vs. 65.5%, P =0.019). In 12.4% (33/267) MACE occurred and only values of FFR CT -2 cm were independently predictive of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.957 [95% CI: 0.925-0.989]; P =0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates FFR CT -2 cm is the optimal measurement site with superior diagnostic performance and independent prognostic role.

Fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic indices: Essential tools for percutaneous coronary interventions

Hemodynamical evaluation of a coronary artery lesion is an important diagnostic step to assess its functional impact. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) received a class IA recommendation from the European Society of Cardiology for the assessment of angiographically moderate stenosis. FFR evaluation of coronary artery disease offers improvement of the therapeutic strategy, deferring unnecessary procedures for lesions with a FFR > 0.8, improving patients' management and clinical outcome. Post intervention, an optimal FFR > 0.9 post stenting should be reached and > 0.8 post drug eluting balloons. Non-hyperemic pressure ratio measurements have been validated in previous studies with a common threshold of 0.89. They might overestimate the hemodynamic significance of some lesions but remain useful whenever hyperemic agents are contraindicated. FFR remains the gold standard reference for invasive assessment of ischemia. We illustrate this review with two cases introducing the possibility to estimate also non-invasively FFR from reconstructed 3-D angiograms by quantitative flow ratio. We conclude introducing a hybrid approach to intermediate lesions (DFR 0.85-0.95) potentially maximizing clinical decision from all measurements.

Computed Tomography-Derived Physiology Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization.

Is it the Time to Move Towards Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? The Pros and Cons

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Diagnosis is conventionally performed by direct visualization of the arteries by invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which has inherent limitations and risks. Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been suggested for a more accurate assessment of ischemia in the coronary artery with high accuracy for determining the severity and decision on the necessity of intervention. Nevertheless, invasive coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (ICA-FFR) is currently used in less than one-third of clinical practices because of the invasive nature of ICA and the need for additional equipment and experience, as well as the cost and extra time needed for the procedure. Recent technical advances have moved towards non-invasive high-quality imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance, single-photon emission computed tomography, and coronary computed tomography (CT) scan; however, none had a definitive modality to confirm hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide accurate anatomic and hemodynamic data about the coronary lesion, especially calculating fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CCTA-FFR). Although growing evidence has been published regarding CCTA-FFR results being comparable to ICA-FFR, CCTA-FFR has not yet replaced the invasive conventional angiography, pending additional studies to validate the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic method. Furthermore, it has to be identified whether revascularization of a stenotic lesion is plausible based on CCTA-FFR and if the therapeutic plan can be determined safely and accurately without confirmation from invasive methods. Therefore, in the present review, we will outline the pros and cons of using CCTA-FFR vs. ICA-FFR regarding diagnostic accuracy and treatment decision-making.

Pre-procedural planning of coronary revascularization by cardiac computed tomography: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) and a key role in the management of patients with low-to-intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. However, the clinical information provided by this noninvasive method is still regarded insufficient in patients with diffuse and complex CAD and for planning percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical revascularization procedures. On the other hand, technology advancements have recently shown to improve CCTA diagnostic accuracy in patients with diffuse and calcific stenoses. Moreover, stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CT-FFR) have been introduced in clinical practice as new tools for evaluating the functional relevance of coronary stenoses, with the possibility to overcome the main CCTA drawback, i.e. anatomical assessment only. The potential value of CCTA to plan and guide interventional procedures lies in the wide range of information it can provide: a) detailed evaluation of plaque extension, volume and composition; b) prediction of procedural success of CTO PCI using scores derived from CCTA; c) identification of coronary lesions requiring additional techniques (e.g., atherectomy and lithotripsy) to improve stent implantation success by assessing calcium score and calcific plaque distribution; d) assessment of CCTA-derived Syntax Score and Syntax Score II, which allows to select the mode of revascularization (PCI or CABG) in patients with complex and multivessel CAD. The aim of this Consensus Document is to review and discuss the available data supporting the role of CCTA, CT-FFR and stress CT-MPI in the preprocedural and possibly intraprocedural planning and guidance of myocardial revascularization interventions.

The chronic coronary syndrome—Heart failure roundabout: A multimodality imaging workflow approach

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome of considerable burden with high mortality and hospitalization rates. Approximately two-thirds of patients with HF have ischemic etiology, which makes crucial the identification of relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) can first show signs of dyspnea and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. If establishing a diagnosis of HF and consequent management is clear enough, it will not be the same when it comes to recommendations for etiology assessment. Ischemic heart disease is the most studied disease by cardiac multimodality imaging with excellent diagnostic performance. Based on this aspect, the high prevalence of CAD, the worst outcome—HF patients should undergo a diagnostic work-up using these multimodality imaging techniques. The aim of this mini-review is to provide insights on multimodality imaging for diagnosing CCS in patients with new onset of HF and propose a diagnostic work-up based on current international studies and guidelines.

Pre-procedural planning of coronary revascularization by cardiac computed tomography: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) and a key role in the management of patients with low-to-intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. However, the clinical information provided by this noninvasive method is still regarded insufficient in patients with diffuse and complex CAD and for planning percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical revascularization procedures. On the other hand, technology advancements have recently shown to improve CCTA diagnostic accuracy in patients with diffuse and calcific stenoses. Moreover, stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CT-FFR) have been introduced in clinical practice as new tools for evaluating the functional relevance of coronary stenoses, with the possibility to overcome the main CCTA drawback, i.e. anatomical assessment only. The potential value of CCTA to plan and guide interventional procedures lies in the wide range of information it can provide: a) detailed evaluation of plaque extension, volume and composition; b) prediction of procedural success of CTO PCI using scores derived from CCTA; c) identification of coronary lesions requiring additional techniques (e.g., atherectomy and lithotripsy) to improve stent implantation success by assessing calcium score and calcific plaque distribution; d) assessment of CCTA-derived Syntax Score and Syntax Score II, which allows to select the mode of revascularization (PCI or CABG) in patients with complex and multivessel CAD. The aim of this Consensus Document is to review and discuss the available data supporting the role of CCTA, CT-FFR and stress CT-MPI in the preprocedural and possibly intraprocedural planning and guidance of myocardial revascularization interventions.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: An Expert Consensus Document of Chinese Society of Radiology

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire is a reference standard for evaluating functional stenosis in coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) uses advanced computational analysis methods to noninvasively obtain FFR results from a single conventional coronary computed tomography angiography data to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. More and more evidence has found good correlation between the results of noninvasive CT-FFR and invasive FFR. CT-FFR has proven its potential in optimizing patient management, improving risk stratification and prognosis, and reducing total health care costs. However, there is still a lack of standardized interpretation of CT-FFR technology in real-world clinical settings. This expert consensus introduces the principle, workflow, and interpretation of CT-FFR; summarizes the state-of-the-art application of CT-FFR; and provides suggestions and recommendations for the application of CT-FFR with the aim of promoting the standardized application of CT-FFR in clinical practice.

Assessment of left main coronary artery disease: a comparison between invasive and noninvasive

Left main coronary artery disease has significant therapeutic as well as prognostic implications. The presence of left main coronary artery stenosis is strongly associated with poor short- and long-term prognoses. Accurate identification of left main stenosis is extremely important since it would be the main factor to guide management. There are several modalities used to determine the presence of atherosclerosis and the degree of stenosis in a left main coronary artery. Newer modalities allow for an accurate evaluation of left main stenosis and atherosclerosis. In this review, we go through different invasive and noninvasive modalities to diagnose left main stenosis, shedding more light into coronary computed tomography angiography, and its accuracy in this specific diagnosis.

Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction

Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), which is defined as coronary stenosis <50%, has been increasingly recognized as an emerging entity in clinical practice. Vasomotion abnormality and coronary microvascular dysfunction are two major mechanisms contributing to the occur of angina with non-obstructive CAD. Although routine coronary functional assessment is limited due to several disadvantages, functional evaluation can help to understand the pathophysiological mechanism and/or to exclude specific etiologies. In this review, we summarized the potential mechanisms involved in ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), the two major form of non-obstructive CAD. Additionally, we reviewed currently available functional assessment indices and their use in non-obstructive CAD. Furthermore, we speculated that novel technique combined anatomic and physiologic parameters might provide more individualized therapeutic choice for patients with non-obstructive CAD.

Perspectives in noninvasive imaging for chronic coronary syndromes

Both the latest European guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes and the American guidelines on chest pain have underlined the importance of noninvasive imaging to select patients to be referred to invasive angiography. Nevertheless, although coronary stenosis has long been considered the main determinant of inducible ischemia and symptoms, growing evidence has demonstrated the importance of other underlying mechanisms (e.g., vasospasm, microvascular disease, energetic inefficiency). The search for a pathophysiology-driven treatment of these patients has therefore emerged as an important objective of multimodality imaging, integrating "anatomical" and "functional" information. We here provide an up-to-date guide for the choice and the interpretation of the currently available noninvasive anatomical and/or functional tests, focusing on emerging techniques (e.g., coronary flow velocity reserve, stress-cardiac magnetic resonance, hybrid imaging, functional-coronary computed tomography angiography, etc.), which could provide deeper pathophysiological insights to refine diagnostic and therapeutic pathways in the next future.

Correlation of Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Effect of Standardized Rehabilitation Nursing

This study aimed to explore the clinical application of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and standardized rehabilitation nursing in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CTA image was segmented by reconstruction algorithm and finally assembled into a whole image. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary artery was then performed. 52 patients were selected as the research objects, and standardized rehabilitation nursing was carried out after surgery to analyze the vascular lesion rate of arterial bridge and venous bridge and compare their nursing satisfaction. The results showed that the CTA images were clearer after reconstruction. The number of male patients with venous and arterial lesions was significantly higher than that of the female patients, and the difference between the two groups was obvious (P < 0.05). The number of patients combining with risk factors and LIMA bridge vessels was 0 in grade 3 patients, accounted for the highest proportion (16.67%) in the grade 1 patients, and was 2 in the grade 2 patients (accounting for 4.17%). The satisfaction of patients who received standardized nursing was 97.25%, that of patients who received conventional nursing was 83.42%, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, CTA images of patients' cardiac vessels can be clearly seen by using a block image reconstruction algorithm, which can realize clinical personalized treatment. In addition, patients were more satisfied with standardized rehabilitation nursing.

Coronary Revascularization of Patients with Silent Coronary Ischemia May Reduce the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are the primary cause of death following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We sought to determine whether selective coronary revascularization of CEA patients with asymptomatic coronary ischemia can reduce the risk of MACE, myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death following endarterectomy compared to CEA patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with no cardiac history or symptoms undergoing elective CEA were compared. Group I: patients enrolled in a prospective study of non-invasive pre-operative cardiac evaluation using coronary CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) to detect asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia with selective post-operative coronary revascularization. Group II: matched Control patients with standard pre-operative cardiac evaluation and no post-operative coronary revascularization. Lesion-specific coronary ischemia in Group I was defined as FFR_CT ≤0.80 distal to coronary stenosis with severe ischemia defined as FFR_CT ≤0.75. Endpoints included MACE, cardiac death, MI, cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke and all-cause death through 3-year follow up.

RESULTS

Group I (n=100) and Group II (n=100) patients were similar in age (68 vs 67 years), gender (65% vs 62% male), co-morbidities and indications for CEA (53% vs 48% symptomatic carotid stenosis). In Group I FFR_CT analysis revealed lesion-specific coronary ischemia in 57% of patients, severe coronary ischemia in 44%, left main ischemia in 7% and multivessel ischemia in 28%. The status of coronary ischemia in Group II was unknown. CEA was performed without complications in both groups and all patients received optimal post-operative medical therapy. In Group I, elective coronary revascularization was performed in 33 patients (27 PCI; 6 CABG) 1-3 months following CEA. Group II patients had no elective coronary revascularization. During 3-year follow-up, compared to Group II, Group I patients had fewer MACE (4% vs 17%, HR 0.21 [95% CI 0.07-0.63], P=.004), fewer cardiac deaths (2% vs 9%, HR 0.20 [95% CI 0.04-0.95], P=.030), fewer MIs (3% vs 17%, HR 0.16 [95% CI 0.05-0.54], P=.001) and fewer CV deaths (2% vs 12%, HR 0.16 [95% CI 0.004-0.07], P=0.009). There were no significant differences in the rates of stroke or all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia with selective coronary revascularization following CEA may reduce the risk of MACE, cardiac death, MI and CV death during 3-year follow up compared to CEA patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care.

Heart Team risk assessment with angiography-derived fractional flow reserve determining the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease: Trial design and rationale for the DECISION QFR randomized trial

In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.

Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multivessel coronary artery disease, defined as significant stenosis in two or more major coronary arteries, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis and treatment of multivessel disease have evolved in the PCI era from solely a visual estimation of ischemic risk to a functional evaluation during angiography. This review summarizes the evidence and discusses the commonly used methods of multivessel coronary artery stenosis physiologic assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

While FFR remains the gold standard in coronary physiologic assessment, several pressure-wire-based non-hyperemic indices of functional stenosis have been developed and validated as well as wire-free angiographically derived quantitative flow ratio. Identifying and treating functionally significant coronary atherosclerotic lesions reduce symptoms and major adverse cardiovascular events. Coronary physiologic assessment in multivessel disease minimizes the observer bias in visual estimates of stenosis, changes clinical management, and improves patient outcomes.

An Individualized Approach of Multidisciplinary Heart Team for Myocardial Revascularization and Valvular Heart Disease—State of Art

The multidisciplinary Heart Team (HT) remains the standard of care for highly-burdened patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and valvular heart disease (VHD) and is widely adopted in the medical community and supported by European and American guidelines. An approach of highly-experienced specialists, taking into account numerous clinical factors, risk assessment, long-term prognosis and patients preferences seems to be the most rational option for individuals with. Some studies suggest that HT management may positively impact adherence to current recommendations and encourage the incorporation of patient preferences through the use of shared-decision making. Evidence from randomized-controlled trials are scarce and we still have to satisfy with observational studies. Furthermore, we still do not know how HT should cooperate, what goals are desired and most importantly, how HT decisions affect long-term outcomes and patient’s satisfaction. This review aimed to comprehensively discuss the available evidence establishing the role of HT for providing optimal care for patients with CAD and VHD. We believe that the need for research to recognize the HT definition and range of its functioning is an important issue for further exploration. Improved techniques of interventional cardiology, minimally-invasive surgeries and new drugs determine future perspectives of HT conceptualization, but also add new issues to the complexity of HT cooperation. Regardless of which direction HT has evolved, its concept should be continued and refined to improve healthcare standards.

Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part II

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) was initially developed as a non-invasive diagnostic tool to detect and quantify coronary stenosis. Thanks to the rapid technological development, cardiac CT has become a comprehensive imaging modality which offers anatomical and functional information to guide patient management. This is the second of two complementary documents endorsed by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging aiming to give updated indications on the appropriate use of cardiac CT in different clinical scenarios. In this article, emerging CT technologies and biomarkers, such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve, perfusion imaging, and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation, are described. In addition, the role of cardiac CT in the evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque, cardiomyopathies, structural heart disease, and congenital heart disease is revised.

Cardiac CT angiography in current practice: An American society for preventive cardiology clinical practice statement✰

In this clinical practice statement, we represent a summary of the current evidence and clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), from an expert panel organized by the American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC), and appraises the current use and indications of cardiac CT in clinical practice. Cardiac CT is emerging as a front line non-invasive diagnostic test for CAD, with evidence supporting the clinical utility of cardiac CT in diagnosis and prevention. CCTA offers several advantages beyond other testing modalities, due to its ability to identify and characterize coronary stenosis severity and pathophysiological changes in coronary atherosclerosis and stenosis, aiding in early diagnosis, prognosis and management of CAD. This document further explores the emerging applications of CCTA based on functional assessment using CT derived fractional flow reserve, peri‑coronary inflammation and artificial intelligence (AI) that can provide personalized risk assessment and guide targeted treatment. We sought to provide an expert consensus based on the latest evidence and best available clinical practice guidelines regarding the role of CCTA as an essential tool in cardiovascular prevention - applicable to risk assessment and early diagnosis and management, noting potential areas for future investigation.

CT Fractional Flow Reserve: A Practical Guide to Application, Interpretation, and Problem Solving

CT fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) is a physiologic simulation technique that models coronary flow from routine coronary CT angiography (CTA). To evaluate lesion-specific ischemia, FFR_CT is measured 2 cm distal to a stenotic lesion. FFR_CT greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal. FFR_CT should always be interpreted in correlation with clinical and anatomic coronary CTA findings. FFR_CT increases the specificity of coronary CTA in the evaluation of coronary artery disease, decreases the prevalence of nonobstructive disease in invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and helps with revascularization decisions and planning. Patients with intermediate-risk coronary anatomy at CTA and abnormal FFR_CT can undergo ICA and revascularization, whereas those with normal FFR_CT can be safely deferred from ICA. In borderline FFR_CT values, management is decided in the context of the clinical scenario, but many cases could be safely managed with medical treatment. There are some limitations and pitfalls of FFR_CT. Abnormal FFR_CT values can be seen in mild stenosis, and normal FFR_CTvalues can be seen in severe stenosis. Gradually decreasing or abnormal low FFR_CT values at the distal vessel without a proximal focal lesion could be due to diffuse atherosclerosis. Coronary stents, bypass grafts, coronary anomalies, coronary dissection, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, unstable angina, and acute or recent myocardial infarction are situations in which FFR_CT has not been validated and should not be used at this time. The authors provide a practical guide to the applications and interpretation of FFR_CT, focusing on common pitfalls and challenges. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Multimodality Imaging in Ischemic Chronic Cardiomyopathy

Ischemic chronic cardiomyopathy (ICC) is still one of the most common cardiac diseases leading to the development of myocardial ischemia, infarction, or heart failure. The application of several imaging modalities can provide information regarding coronary anatomy, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia and tissue characterization. In particular, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide information regarding coronary plaque stenosis, its composition, and the possible evaluation of myocardial ischemia using fractional flow reserve CT or CT perfusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to evaluate cardiac function as well as the presence of ischemia. In addition, CMR can be used to characterize the myocardial tissue of hibernated or infarcted myocardium. Echocardiography is the most widely used technique to achieve information regarding function and myocardial wall motion abnormalities during myocardial ischemia. Nuclear medicine can be used to evaluate perfusion in both qualitative and quantitative assessment. In this review we aim to provide an overview regarding the different noninvasive imaging techniques for the evaluation of ICC, providing information ranging from the anatomical assessment of coronary artery arteries to the assessment of ischemic myocardium and myocardial infarction. In particular this review is going to show the different noninvasive approaches based on the specific clinical history of patients with ICC.

The Clinical Value of Syntax Scores in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease Outcomes

The Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (SS) hassignificantly improved angiographic risk stratification. By analyzing angiographic variables, this score characterizescoronary artery disease qualitatively and quantitatively. To date, combining this score with other non-angiographic clinicalscores has broadened perspectives regarding risk estimation, and future research on this topic appears promising.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.