Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007

Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)

AIM

We evaluated a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on a no-stent strategy, corresponding to a combination of scoring balloon angioplasty (SCBA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB), as a first line approach. Stents were used only in unstable patients, or in case of mandatory bailout stenting (BO-stent).

METHODS

From April 2019 to March 2020, 984 consecutive patients, including 1922 lesions, underwent PCI. The 12-month primary end-point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and target lesion revascularization. Patients were classified into conventional or no-stent strategy groups according to the PCI strategy. In the no-stent strategy group, they were further classified into BO-stent or DCB-only groups. Their metal index was calculated by stent length divided by the total lesion length.

RESULTS

The no-stent strategy was applied in 85% of the patients, and it was successful for 65% of them. MACE occurred in 7.1% of the study population, including 4.2% of all-cause death. Target lesion revascularization was required in 1.4%, 3.6%, and 1.5% of patients in the conventional DES, BO-stent, and DCB-only groups, respectively. MACE occurred more often in the elderly and in those treated with at least one stent (metal index greater than 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The no-stent strategy, i.e., revascularization of coronary lesions by SCBA followed by DCB and with DES bailout stenting, was effective and safe at 1 year. This PCI approach was applicable on a daily practice in our cath lab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03893396, first posted on March 28, 2019). Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease. DES: drug eluting stent; SCBA: scoring balloon angioplasty; BO-stent: at least one stent; DCB: drug coated balloon; BMS: bare metal stent; Bailout (dash lines); MACE: major adverse cardiac event.

Application of drug-coated balloons for intracranial atherosclerosis disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) was an effective and safe alternative treatment for severe intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD), the high rate of restenosis remained a major issue for this endovascular procedure. Recently, the application of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in ICAD was developed to reduce restenosis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty for ICAD.

METHODS

We searched relevant databases for eligible studies enrolling ICAD patients treated with DCB. The event rates of restenosis and periprocedural complications in the follow-up period were pooled with random-/fixed-effect models using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity tests and publication bias tests were performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-four ICAD patients treated with DCB from 9 eligible studies were included. Rate of stenosis in the DCB arm before treatment was ranged from 62% to 90% and reported median follow-up was ranged from 3 to 10.7 months. The pooled incidence of restenosis were 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%-9.7%; I² = 0%, p = 0.516) and 5.9% for periprocedural complications (95% CI: 2.5-10.3%; I² = 0%, p = 0.649) in follow-up term.

CONCLUSION

With the limitation of the low quality of the available evidence, angioplasty with DCB appears to be effective and safe in severe ICAD. Further larger randomized trials are needed to provide more definitive evidence and to address the ideal clinical context for their application.

Acute and sub-acute stent thrombosis: Frequency, predictors and features in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention at a tertiary care cardiac centre

•

Early stent thrombosis (ST) is relatively frequent in patients undergoing primary PCI.

•

Diabetic and hypertensive patients are at an increased risk of ST.

•

Presentation of patients in Killip Class III-IV is an independent predictor of early ST.

Objectives

To assess the frequency of early (acute and sub-acute) stent thrombosis (ST) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and to identify its potential predictors.

Background

ST is a serious clinical event associated with a high mortality rate. A very limited data are available regarding the incidence rate of early ST after pPCI and its predictors, especially for Pakistani population.

Methods

Study included consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI. Telephonic follow-ups were made to obtain 30-days outcomes including ST, mortality, and re-occurrence of symptoms. ST was defined as per the standardized definition proposed by the Academic Research Consortium and classified as acute (during the procedure) and sub-acute (within 30 days).

Results

A total of 569 patients were included with 80.5% (485) male patients. The stent thrombosis (acute or sub-acute) was observed in 33 (5.8%) patients out of which 3 (9.1%) were definite ST while remaining 30 (90.9%) were probable ST. Patients who develop ST were predominantly male, hypertensive, diabetic, with reduced pre PCI LVEF (%) and Killip Class. A significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate was observed in patients with ST as compared to without ST, 36.4% (12/33) vs. 0.2% (1/536); p-value < 0.001 respectively. Killip Class (III-IV) was found to be the independent predictor of ST with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.2 [1.76–15.32].

Conclusions

Early stent thrombosis (ST) is relatively frequent in patients undergoing primary PCI. Diabetic and hypertensive patients are at an increased risk of ST and presentation of patients in Killip Class III-IV is an independent predictor of early ST.

Hemodynamic Performance of a New Punched Stent Strut: A Numerical Study

Local flow disturbance by arterial stent struts has been shown to play an important role in stent thrombosis. To reduce the local flow disturbance near a stent strut, we proposed a new concept of stent design with small holes in the stent struts. The present study evaluated the new design numerically by comparing it with the traditional stent in terms of local hemodynamic parameters such as flow velocity, flow recirculation area, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillating shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT). The results demonstrated that when compared with the traditional strut, the new design could significantly enhance flow velocity and reduce the flow recirculation zone in the vicinity of the strut. Moreover, the new design would significantly elevate TAWSS and remarkably reduce OSI and RRT along the host arterial wall. In conclusion, the new design of stent struts with punched holes is advantageous over the traditional one in the aspect of improving local hemodynamics, which may reduce thrombosis formation and promote re-endothelialization after stenting.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world: 8-year follow-up

Background:

Drug-eluting stents have been used in daily practice since 2002, with the clear advantages of reducing the risk of target vessel revascularization and an impressive reduction in restenosis rate by 50%-70%. However, the occurrence of a late thrombosis can compromise long-term results, particularly if the risks of this event were sustained. In this context, a registry of clinical cases gains special value.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world.

Methods:

We report on the clinical findings and 8-year follow-up parameters of all patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent from January 2002 to April 2007. Drug-eluting stents were used in accordance with the clinical and interventional cardiologist decision and availability of the stent.

Results:

A total of 611 patients were included, and clinical follow-up of up to 8 years was obtained for 96.2% of the patients. Total mortality was 8.7% and nonfatal infarctions occurred in 4.3% of the cases. Target vessel revascularization occurred in 12.4% of the cases, and target lesion revascularization occurred in 8% of the cases. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.1%. There were no new episodes of stent thrombosis after the fifth year of follow-up. Comparative subanalysis showed no outcome differences between the different types of stents used, including Cypher®, Taxus®, and Endeavor®.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective at very long-term follow-up. Patients in the "real world" may benefit from drug-eluting stenting with excellent, long-term results.

From Histology and Imaging Data to Models for In-Stent Restenosis

The implantation of stents has been used to treat coronary artery stenosis for several decades. Although stenting is successful in restoring the vessel lumen and is a minimally invasive approach, the long-term outcomes are often compromised by in-stent restenosis (ISR). Animal models have provided insights into the pathophysiology of ISR and are widely used to evaluate candidate drug inhibitors of ISR. Such biological models allow the response of the vessel to stent implantation to be studied without the variation of lesion characteristics encountered in patient studies.

This paper describes the development of complementary in silico models employed to improve the understanding of the biological response to stenting using a porcine model of restenosis. This includes experimental quantification using microCT imaging and histology and the use of this data to establish numerical models of restenosis. Comparison of in silico results with histology is used to examine the relationship between spatial localization of fluid and solid mechanics stimuli immediately post-stenting. Multi-scale simulation methods are employed to study the evolution of neointimal growth over time and the variation in the extent of neointimal hyperplasia within the stented region. Interpretation of model results through direct comparison with the biological response contributes to more detailed understanding of the pathophysiology of ISR, and suggests the focus for follow-up studies.

In conclusion we outline the challenges which remain to both complete our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for restenosis and translate these models to applications in stent design and treatment planning at both population-based and patient-specific levels.

Pathologic Evaluation of Cardiovascular Medical Devices

Cardiovascular devices such as coronary artery stents, ventricular assist devices, pacemakers, automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and septal closure devices are life saving and improve quality of life for millions of patients each year. Complications of these devices include thrombosis/thromboembolism, infection, structural failure and adverse material-tissue interactions. These findings should be sought when these devices are encountered on the surgical pathology bench or at autopsy.

Neurovascular in-stent stenoses: treatment with conventional and drug-eluting balloons

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

ISRs remain a major issue in the endovascular management of ICAD, requiring retreatment by reangioplasty. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and efficiency of the novel DEBs for neurovascular ISRs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients (median age, 67 years; age range, 34-82 years; male/female ratio, 37:14) underwent 63 balloon dilation procedures for ISRs in intracranial stented arterial segments between November 2007 and August 2010 in a single center. Of the 63 procedures, 20 (32%) were performed by using a conventional balloon and 43 (68%), by using a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please). Angiographic and clinical follow-up was performed at 6 and 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Technical success rate, periprocedural complications, occurrence of recurrent ischemic symptoms, and the development of a recurrent ISR after reangioplasty were analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success, defined as <50% residual stenosis was achieved in all cases (100%), with failure of the DEB treatment in 6% of the attempts; those lesions were finally successfully treated with a conventional balloon. The combined permanent neurologic morbidity and mortality rate (stroke, ICH, and SAH) at 30 days was 1.6%. Substantial difference was found in the rate of recurrent stenosis when comparing conventional balloons and DEBs, with recurrent stenosis rates of 50% and 9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial results of reangioplasty of intracranial ISRs with DEBs are encouraging; further technical developments are, nevertheless, mandatory.

Multi-scale simulations of the dynamics of in-stent restenosis: impact of stent deployment and design

Neointimal hyperplasia, a process of smooth muscle cell re-growth, is the result of a natural wound healing response of the injured artery after stent deployment. Excessive neointimal hyperplasia following coronary artery stenting results in in-stent restenosis (ISR). Regardless of recent developments in the field of coronary stent design, ISR remains a significant complication of this interventional therapy. The influence of stent design parameters such as strut thickness, shape and the depth of strut deployment within the vessel wall on the severity of restenosis has already been highlighted but the detail of this influence is unclear. These factors impact on local haemodynamics and vessel structure and affect the rate of neointima formation. This paper presents the first results of a multi-scale model of ISR. The development of the simulated restenosis as a function of stent deployment depth is compared with an in vivo porcine dataset. Moreover, the influence of strut size and shape is investigated, and the effect of a drug released at the site of injury, by means of a drug-eluting stent, is also examined. A strong correlation between strut thickness and the rate of smooth muscle cell proliferation has been observed. Simulation results also suggest that the growth of the restenotic lesion is strongly dependent on the stent strut cross-sectional profile.

Patterns of use of thienopyridine therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents

BACKGROUND

Twelve months of uninterrupted thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation was recently recommended, but limited data are available regarding long-term use in clinical practice. The objective of the study was to determine the adherence to thienopyridine therapy after stent implantation, factors associated with suboptimal adherence, and association of suboptimal adherence with mortality.

METHODS

We evaluated 5,263 older patients (>65 years) who received DES and 6,081 older patients who received bare-metal stents (BMS) from December 1, 2003, to March 31, 2006, in Ontario, Canada, who were eligible to receive 12 months of thienopyridine at minimal cost.

RESULTS

Primary nonadherence was observed among 6.9% in the DES group and 7.1% in the BMS group that did not fill a single prescription of thienopyridine within 1 year of stent implantation. Premature discontinuation occurred in a progressive manner, with 28% in the DES group and 34% in the BMS group discontinuing therapy by 6 months. Low-income patients eligible for a waiver of deductible and dispensing fee were almost 70% more likely to fill their first prescription. For DES patients, primary nonadherence (hazard ratio [HR] 2.68, 95% CI 1.77-4.07), 12-months proportional days covered <80% (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.67-3.43), and prematurely discontinuing therapy within 6 months (HR 2.64, 95% 1.60-4.35) were associated with an increased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

We found suboptimal patterns of adherence to thienopyridine therapy after DES implantation that was strongly associated with an increased mortality risk. Eliminating any costs for thienopyridine therapy may be an effective strategy to increase medication adherence.

p27kip1-838C>A single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with restenosis risk after coronary stenting and modulates p27kip1 promoter activity

BACKGROUND

The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(kip1) is a key regulator of smooth muscle cell and leukocyte proliferation in vascular disease, including in-stent restenosis. We therefore hypothesized that common genetic variations or single nucleotide polymorphisms in p27(kip1) may serve as a useful tool in risk stratification for in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three single nucleotide polymorphisms concerning the p27(kip1) gene (-838C>A, rs36228499; -79C>T, rs34330; +326G>T, rs2066827) were determined in a cohort of 715 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and stent placement. We discovered that the p27(kip1)-838C>A single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with clinical in-stent restenosis; the -838AA genotype decreases the risk of target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.77). This finding was replicated in another cohort study of 2309 patients (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.93). No association was detected between this end point and the p27(kip1)-79C>T and +326G>T single nucleotide polymorphisms. We subsequently studied the functional importance of the -838C>A single nucleotide polymorphism and detected a 20-fold increased basal p27(kip1) transcriptional activity of the -838A allele containing promoter.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with the p27(kip1)-838AA genotype have a decreased risk of in-stent restenosis corresponding with enhanced promoter activity of the -838A allele of this cell-cycle inhibitor, which may explain decreased smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Durability of antirestenotic efficacy in drug-eluting stents with and without permanent polymer

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess changes in antirestenotic efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) by restudying subjects at 2 time points after coronary stenting (6 to 8 months and 2 years) and to compare differences in time courses of late luminal loss (LLL) between 3 different DES platforms in use at our institution.

BACKGROUND

DES therapy is associated with low levels of LLL at 6 to 8 months. The temporal course of neointimal formation after this time point remains unclear.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, systematic angiographic follow-up study was conducted at 2 centers in Munich, Germany. Patients underwent stenting with permanent-polymer rapamycin-eluting stents (RES), polymer-free RES, or permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). The primary end point was delayed LLL (the difference in in-stent LLL between 6 to 8 months and 2 years).

RESULTS

Of 2,588 patients undergoing stenting, 2,030 patients (78.4%) had 6- to 8-month angiographic follow-up and were enrolled in the study. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 259 patients; these patients were not considered for further angiographic analysis. Of 1,771 remaining patients, 1,331 had available 2-year reangiographic data (75.2%). Overall mean (SD) delayed LLL was 0.12 +/- 0.49 mm (0.17 +/- 0.50 mm, 0.01 +/- 0.42 mm, and 0.13 +/- 0.50 mm in permanent-polymer RES, polymer-free RES, and permanent-polymer PES groups, respectively [p < 0.001]). In multivariate analysis, only stent type (in favor of polymer-free RES) predicted delayed LLL.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing erosion of luminal caliber beyond 6 to 8 months after the index procedure is observed following DES implantation. Absence of permanent polymer from the DES platform seems to militate against this effect.

Long-term clinical outcome with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in an unselected population

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical events in patients treated with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bio-active stents (BAS) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

All patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were eligible for this single-centre registry between May 2003 and November 2004. The primary end point of the study was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years including myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and target vessel revascularization (TVR).

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients received BAS and 204 patients PES. In addition, during the same study period, 184 patients were treated with bare-metal stents (BMS) and 125 patients underwent CABG. Complete follow-up datasets were available in all patients. After 3 years of follow-up, the rate of MACE was 13.9% for BAS and 23.5% for PES (adjusted HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, p=0.006). This difference was mainly driven by a higher incidence of MI in the PES group (19.1%) compared with the BAS (7.5%) group (adjusted HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.8, p<0.001). The rate of MACE was 31.5% in the BMS group and 4% in the CABG group. At 3 years, stent thrombosis occurred in 15 patients in the PES (7.4%) group. There was no stent thrombosis in the BAS group.

CONCLUSIONS

After the 3 year follow-up, BAS resulted in better long-term outcome compared with PES with infrequent need for TVR.

The problem of stent thrombosis associated with drug-eluting stents and the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy

Drug-eluting stents have significantly reduced the problem of restenosis, but there is an association between drug-eluting stents and stent thrombosis that can be a significant clinical problem resulting in myocardial infarction or death. The risk for stent thrombosis increases in certain clinical situations and has been reduced through the use of dual antiplatelet therapy for prolonged periods. Until new therapies are developed, it is essential that patients who have had drug-eluting stents implanted continue with dual-antiplatelet therapy for at least 1 year and possibly for an indefinite period.

Long-term outcomes of patients receiving drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

We sought to establish the long-term safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in a usual care setting.

METHODS

Using data from a prospective multicentre registry, we compared rates of death and of death or repeat revascularization during 3 years of follow-up of 6440 consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty with either drug-eluting or bare-metal stents between Apr. 1, 2003, and Mar. 31, 2006.

RESULTS

Drug-eluting stents were inserted in 1120 patients and bare-metal stents in 5320. The drug-eluting stents were selected for patients who had a greater burden of comorbid illness, including diabetes mellitus (32.8% v. 20.8% in the bare-metal group, p < 0.001) and renal disease (7.4% v. 5.0%, p = 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, the drug-eluting stents were associated with a mortality of 3.0%, as compared with 3.7% with the bare-metal stents (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.83). The rate of the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization was 12.0% for the drug-eluting stents and 15.8% for the bare-metal stents (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33-0.49). In the subgroup of patients who had acute coronary syndromes, the adjusted OR for this composite outcome was 0.46 (95% CI 0.35-0.61). During the 3 years of observation, the relative risks for death and repeat revascularization varied over time. In year 1, there was an initial period of lower risk in the group with drug-eluting stents than in the group with bare-metal stents; this was followed by a shift toward outcome rates favouring bare-metal stents in years 2 and 3. The adjusted relative risk of the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization associated with drug-eluting stents relative to bare-metal stents was 0.73 early in the first year of follow-up; it then rose gradually over time, to a peak of 2.24 at 3 years.

INTERPRETATION

Drug-eluting stents are safe and effective in the first year following insertion. Thereafter, the possibility of longer term adverse events cannot be ruled out.

Catheter-Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

September 2007 marked the 30-year anniversary of the first human percutaneous coronary intervention, an index event that changed the course of modern-day cardiovascular care. Before that first procedure, adult invasive cardiology focused on diagnostic angiography as well as hemodynamic assessment of structural heart disease. Since that initial procedure, percutaneous coronary intervention has become the most frequently performed coronary revascularization procedure worldwide. Several factors have been responsible for this dramatic paradigm shift, the most prominent being identification of opportunities for technical improvement and the application of innovation and investigation in concert with colleagues, professional societies, and industry. These approaches will continue to be of paramount importance as new technologies are brought to bear on an increasingly broader group of patients with cardiovascular disease.

Homotypic and endothelial cell adhesions via N-cadherin determine polarity and regulate migration of vascular smooth muscle cells

Migration of smooth muscle cells from the arterial media to the intima is central to several vascular pathologies including restenosis. This study demonstrates that, like directional migration of other cells, smooth muscle migration is accompanied by a dramatic, polarized reorganization of the cell cytoskeleton that is accompanied by activation of the Rho GTPase Cdc42 and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta. We also show, for the first time, that signals generated at the posterior-lateral aspects of wound edge cells by the cell-cell adhesion molecule N-cadherin are required for polarization and rapid migration of vascular smooth muscle. Importantly, when a cohort of migrating smooth muscle cells encounter CHO cells or the A10 smooth muscle cell line, neither of which expresses N-cadherin, polarity is only slightly suppressed. However, when smooth muscle cells encounter stably transfected, N-cadherin-expressing A10 cells or (N-cadherin-expressing) vascular endothelium, they rapidly lose their polarized phenotype. The latter finding indicates that endothelial signaling to innermost smooth muscle cells via N-cadherin may be critical to normal vessel wall stability. We infer that asymmetrical distribution of N-cadherin is necessary for the establishment of cell polarity during migration and that N-cadherin ligation is highly effective in abrogating polarized migration. Finally, we showed that endothelial cell polarity does not depend on N-cadherin; therefore, this molecule may be an attractive target for therapies to prevent restenosis without suppressing endothelial repair and risking late thrombosis.

The future of drug-eluting stents

This review aims to provide a glimpse into the future of drug-eluting stents (DES). Since their arrival in 2002, DES have transformed the practice of interventional cardiology by drastically reducing restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. However, data about the potentially fatal long-term risk of stent thrombosis have spurred on research and development to improve upon the first generation of devices. The initial commercially available DES used a stainless steel platform coated with a permanent polymer to provide controlled release of the anti-restenotic drug. The platform, polymer and drug are all targets for improvement. More advanced metallic and fully biodegradable stent platforms are currently under investigation. The permanent polymer coating, a likely contributor adverse events, is being superseded by biocompatible and bioabsorbable alternatives. New drugs and drug combinations are also a research goal, as interventional cardiologists and the industry strive towards safer anti-restenotic DES.

Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients at high or low risk of major cardiac events in the Basel Stent KostenEffektivitäts Trial (BASKET): an 18-month analysis

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine whether drug-eluting stents are good value for money in long-term, everyday practice.

METHODS

We did an 18-month cost-effectiveness analysis of the Basel Stent KostenEffektivitäts Trial (BASKET), which randomised 826 patients 2:1 to drug-eluting stents (n=545) or to bare-metal stents (281). We used non-parametric bootstrap techniques to determine incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents, to compare low-risk (> or =3.0 mm stents in native vessels; n=558, 68%) and high-risk patients (<3.0 mm stents/bypass graft stenting; n=268, 32%), and to do sensitivity analyses by altering costs and event rates in the whole study sample and in predefined subgroups. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed by EQ-5D questionnaire (available in 703/826 patients).

FINDINGS

Overall costs were higher for patients with drug-eluting stents than in those with bare-metal stents (11,808 euros [SD 400] per patient with drug-eluting stents and 10,450 euros [592] per patient with bare-metal stents, mean difference 1358 euros [717], p<0.0001), due to higher stent costs. We calculated an ICER of 64,732 euros to prevent one major adverse cardiac event, and of 40,467 euros per QALY gained. Stent costs, number of events, and QALYs affected ICERs most, but unrealistic alterations would have been required to achieve acceptable cost-effectiveness. In low-risk patients, the probability of drug-eluting stents achieving an arbitrary ICER of 10,000 euros or less to prevent one major adverse cardiac event was 0.016; by contrast, it was 0.874 in high-risk patients.

INTERPRETATION

If used in all patients, drug-eluting stents are not good value for money, even if prices were substantially reduced. Drug-eluting stents are cost effective in patients needing small vessel or bypass graft stenting, but not in those who require large native vessel stenting.