Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Aortic Annular Enlargement: Y-Incision Rationale, Technique, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have shown that in patients with annuli <26 mm, SAVR had negative hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. Recently, studies revealed that the effective orifice diameter of surgical prosthetic valves is 5-7 mm smaller than the labeled valve size. To improve outcomes of SAVR, the Y-incision aortic annular enlargement (AAE) enlarges the surgical aortic annulus to accommodate a prosthetic valve 3-4 sizes larger with an effective orifice area that matches the patient's native annulus. This review discusses when and how the Y-incision AAE should be performed.

METHODS

OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched with terms that included "Y-incision aortic annular enlargement," "valve sizes," and "long-term survival." The search included publications after 2020. The reference lists of included studies were reviewed to retrieve additional studies.

RESULTS

In patients with matched native annular sizes, AAE significantly improved midterm survival without increasing perioperative complications. Patients treated with a larger valve had notably better long-term survival and small valve sizes were significant risk factors for operative and long-term mortality. Compared with patients treated with a Nicks or Manougian procedure, the hemodynamics in patients treated with Y-incision AAE were significantly better.

CONCLUSIONS

Y-incision AAE could be routinely considered for patients with a normal annulus (17-25 mm) undergoing SAVR.

Evolution and prognostic implications of cardiac damage in women after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Recently, a cardiac damage staging system has been proposed in patients with severe AS to improve risk stratification, but there is still paucity of data in women. Accordingly, we aimed to characterize the change in cardiac damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to assess the prognostic value of cardiac damage staging in women. A total of 334 women (mean age 81 ± 7 years) with severe AS undergoing TAVI were included and retrospectively analyzed. Echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after TAVI. Patients were classified according to the following stages of cardiac damage: 0 = no damage; 1 = left ventricular damage; 2 = left atrial or mitral valve damage; 3 = pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage; and 4 = right ventricular damage. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Most patients presented with advanced heart failure symptoms (62% in NYHA III-IV). TAVI consistently improved cardiac damage of at least one stage in 43% of patients at 6-month follow-up. During a median follow-up of 48 months, 79 patients (24%) died. Each increment of both baseline (HR per 1-stage increment 1.537, P = 0.001) and follow-up (HR per 1-stage increment 1.714, P = 0.01) cardiac damage stage were independently associated with all-cause death. Moreover, the re-assessment of cardiac damage at 6-month follow-up provided incremental prognostic value over baseline assessment (Chi-square change = 6.885; P = 0.009). TAVI has a beneficial effect on cardiac function and remodeling in women. Cardiac damage assessed before and 6 months after TAVI showed to be consistently and independently associated with prognosis.

TAVR vs. SAVR for severe aortic stenosis in the low and intermediate surgical risk population: An updated meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients of age > 65 years. The relative risks and benefits of TAVR vs. SAVR in low and intermediate surgical risk remain incompletely described.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in low and intermediate surgical risk.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs (9239 patients, TAVR 50.8 %) were included. TAVR was associated with lower rates of all-cause death or stroke at 30-day (rate ratio [RR] 0.70; 95%CI 0.55-0.89; p = 0.003; I2 = 26 %) and 1-year (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.60-0.98; p = 0.033; I2 = 54 %) follow-up. Bleeding complications, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), acute kidney injury (AKI), and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) were lower with TAVR at 30 days and 1-year. Permanent pacemaker implantation, aortic valve reintervention, major vascular complications, and paravalvular leak (PVL) were significantly higher with TAVR at 30-day and 1-year follow-ups. Rates of all-cause death, stroke, MI, endocarditis, and rehospitalization were comparable between the groups at 30-day and 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe AS and low to intermediate surgical risk, TAVR is associated with reduced rates of all-cause death or stroke, bleeding, new-onset AF, AKI, and severe PPM compared to SAVR. However, despite these short-term benefits, higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation, PVL, and reintervention raise significant concerns about the long-term safety of TAVR, particularly for younger, lower-risk patients.

Aortic shape and diameter variations are predictive of short-term complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

INTRODUCTION

Anatomic and geometric considerations are critical components for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedural planning. Aortic root geometry and 3-dimensional orientation have been previously associated with short-term complications but with mixed and inconsistent results. The purpose of this study was to investigate aortic 3-dimensional anatomical shape variants identified by principal component analysis (PCA) and whether these variants are associated with short-term complications.

METHODS

Pre-TAVR planning chest CT angiograms (N = 100) were analyzed to create 3-dimensional anatomic aortic models were subjected to PCA. Aortic shape variants described by principal components (PCs) and their respective scores were calculated for each patient in addition to standard planning geometric parameters. A short-term composite complication outcome within 1-month from the implantation included major and minor stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding, stage 3 acute kidney injury, new heart block and moderate plus paravalvular leak (PVL).

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients (25%) experienced perioperative complications following TAVR. Shape based PCs were: PC1 - variation in aortic arch height, isthmic angle, and aortic arch angle; PC2 aortic length; PC3- aortic tilt. Diameter based PCs described: PC1- diameter size along the entire aortic length; PC2- aortic diameter tapering, PC3- ascending to arch diameter ratio. On univariable logistic regression, four variables were predictive of periprocedural complications, including the ascending aortic diameter at the level of Valsalva sinuses (OR: 0.88 (95%CI: 0.78-1.00), P = 0.044), PC1-shape scores (OR: 1.01 (95%CI: 1.00-1.02), P = 0.011), PC2-shape scores (OR: 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97-1.00), P = 0.034), and PC-1 diameter scores (OR: 0.98 (95%CI: 0.96-1.00), P = 0.023). An optimized multivariable model considering only PC1-shape and PC1-diameter revealed a C-statistic of 0.76 with a sensitivity of 92.0% and specificity of 32.0%.

CONCLUSION

Aortic shape variants combining increased aortic arch height, acute isthmic angle, and mild aortic arch angle as identified by PCA were associated along with aortic size with higher rates of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. PCA identified shape variations outperformed standard 2-dimensional geometric measurements and could be considered as part of risk stratification prior to TAVR planning.

Comparative effectiveness of transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis has been revolutionized by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), offering a minimally invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions remain subjects of ongoing investigation.

AIM

To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAVR and SAVR were identified from databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to May 31, 2024. Data were extracted on clinical outcomes, including mortality, procedural complications, and post-procedure adverse events. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95%CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 10 RCTs were included. TAVR demonstrated a significantly lower risk of acute kidney injury (RR: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.25-0.44), major bleeding (RR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.30-0.46), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.44; 95%CI: 0.34-0.57) compared to SAVR. However, TAVR was associated with higher risks of new permanent pacemaker implantation (RR: 3.49; 95%CI: 2.77-4.39), major vascular complications (RR: 2.47; 95%CI: 1.91-3.21), and paravalvular leaks (RR: 4.15; 95%CI: 3.14-5.48). Mortality at 30 days was comparable (RR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.78-1.15), but long-term mortality was slightly higher with TAVR in some analyses (RR: 1.23; 95%CI: 1.01-1.49). Rates of stroke (RR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.81-1.17) and myocardial infarction (RR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.67-1.24) were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

TAVR offers a less invasive option with significant benefits in reducing acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and new-onset atrial fibrillation, making it particularly advantageous for high-risk surgical candidates. However, higher risks of permanent pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and paravalvular leaks highlight the need for individualized patient selection and shared decision-making to optimize outcomes.

Aortic Stenosis: Time for a Sex-Based Approach?

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive form of valvular heart disease most commonly associated with aging, with an exponential increase in prevalence after age 50. While men have historically been considered at higher risk, recent studies highlight a similar prevalence between men and women, with a higher prevalence in elderly women driven by longer life expectancy. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation, anatomy, and pathophysiology influence disease progression, severity assessment, and management. Women are often diagnosed at more advanced stages, exhibiting more pronounced symptoms, typically dyspnea and functional impairment, whereas men more often report chest pain. Women have a smaller body surface area, leading to smaller aortic annuli, left ventricular outflow tracts, aortic roots impacting flow dynamic, and severity grading. Diagnostic challenge contributes to the undertreatment of women. Despite experiencing severe AS, women receive fewer interventions and face delays in treatment. The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improved outcomes, with studies suggesting a potential advantage in women compared to men. However, the anatomical differences, such as smaller annuli and more tortuous vascular access, necessitate tailored procedural approaches. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is essential to optimizing AS management, ensuring timely interventions, and improving patient outcomes. Future strategies should incorporate sex-specific thresholds for diagnosis and treatment while leveraging technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence, for personalized therapeutic decisions.

Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in women: the RHEIA trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis have more complications than men when undergoing surgical valve replacement, they are under-represented in clinical trials. The Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis (RHEIA) trial investigates the balance of benefits and risks of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgery in women.

METHODS

Women were randomized 1:1 to transfemoral TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve or surgery. The primary composite endpoint was death, stroke, or (valve, procedure or heart failure related) rehospitalization at 1 year. Non-inferiority testing with a pre-specified 6% margin and superiority testing were performed in the as-treated population.

RESULTS

At 48 European centres, 443 women underwent randomization, and 420 were treated as randomized. Mean age was 73 years, and the mean estimated surgical risk of death was 2.1% (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the primary endpoint event rates at 1 year were 8.9% in the TAVI and 15.6% in the surgery group. This difference of -6.8% with an upper 95% confidence limit of -1.5% demonstrated the non-inferiority of TAVI (P < .001). The two-sided 95% confidence interval of -13.0% to -.5% further resulted in superiority (P = .034). The 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint components was: .9% with TAVI vs. 2.0% with surgery for death from any cause, 3.3% vs. 3.0% for stroke, and 5.8% vs. 11.4% for rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with severe aortic stenosis, the incidence of the composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year was lower with TAVI than with surgery.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER

NCT04160130.

Structural Heart Disease Interventions. Year in Review 2023-2024

In 2023-2024, there was a surge in research on structural heart disease. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the field for both general and interventional cardiologists, especially those with a keen interest in structural heart interventions. It summarizes the most important randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, retrospective analyses, data registries, and noteworthy late-breaking studies unveiled at prominent cardiology conferences.

What Are SAVR Indications in the TAVI Era?

While surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a compelling less invasive alternative for patients with severe AS across the entire surgical risk spectrum. Despite TAVI's increasing utilization and promising outcomes, SAVR continues to be an essential treatment modality for certain patient populations, including individuals with complex aortic anatomies unsuitable for TAVI, patients presenting with significant aortic regurgitation, individuals requiring concomitant surgical procedures, and cases involving infective endocarditis. Furthermore, concerns regarding the long-term durability and complication profile of transcatheter valves underscore the importance of individualized patient assessment, especially for younger patients requiring optimal lifetime management strategies. This review examines the evolving role of SAVR amidst the growing adoption of TAVI and highlights key considerations for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with aortic valve disease, incorporating insights from recent advancements in transcatheter technologies and the latest clinical trial evidence.

Cardiac Surgery 2024 Reviewed

For the 11th consecutive time, we systematically reviewed the cardio-surgical literature for the past year (2024), using the PRISMA approach for a results-oriented summary. In 2024, the discussion on the value of randomized and registry evidence increased, triggered by consistent findings in the field of coronary artery disease (CAD) and discrepant results in structural heart disease. The literature in 2024 again confirmed the excellent long-term outcomes of CABG compared with PCI in different scenarios, generating further validation for the CABG advantage reported in randomized studies. This has been reflected in the new guidelines for chronic CAD in 2024. Two studies indicate novel perspectives for CABG, showing that cardiac shockwave therapy in CABG improves myocardial function in ischemic hearts and that CABG guided by computed tomography is safe and feasible. For aortic stenosis, an early advantage for transcatheter (TAVI) compared with surgical (SAVR) treatment has found more support; however, long-term TAVI results keep being challenged, this year by new FDA and registry data in favor of SAVR. For failed aortic valves, redo-SAVR showed superior results compared with valve-in-valve TAVI. In the mitral field, studies showed short-term noninferiority for transcatheter treatment compared with surgery for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), and significant long-term survival benefit in registries with surgery for primary MR. Finally, surgery was associated with better survival compared with medical therapy for acute type A aortic intramural hematoma. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It cannot be complete nor free of individual interpretation but provides up-to-date information for patient-specific decision-making.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Beyond Severe Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment option in appropriate patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). A number of advancements have since expanded the eligible population to bicuspid aortic valve with feasible anatomy; small aortic annuli; low-flow, low-gradient AS; and younger patients. Focus has also shifted beyond the symptomatic severe patients to asymptomatic severe and moderate AS, as early valve replacement may prevent irreversible cardiac remodeling. Dedicated devices to treat native aortic regurgitation have shown encouraging short-term outcomes. While the expansion of TAVR to younger patients has raised questions about valve durability and feasibility of reintervention, valve-in-valve TAVR has thus far shown encouraging midterm results. In this review, we summarize the evidence in these contemporary TAVR populations, exploring both the promise and challenge of broadening the patient pool for this minimally invasive procedure.

Aortic Valve Intervention in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Small Annulus

Over the last two decades, the management of aortic stenosis has undergone significant transformation due to developments in surgical techniques and the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). These transformations have enabled improved patient selection and treatments to be tailored based on individual clinical and anatomical characteristics. Both surgical and transcatheter options have resulted in reduced mortality and enhanced quality of life for patients with aortic stenosis. Nonetheless, treating patients with small aortic annulus remains challenging despite advances in current technology. The insertion of a small prosthetic valve, leading to patient prosthetic mismatch, has been associated with heart failure hospitalization, early structural valve degeneration, and long-term mortality. Although aortic root enlargement was historically employed to address this issue, stentless and sutureless valves in the supra-annular position and, more recently, TAVI have emerged as alternative treatments for patients with small annulus and severe aortic stenosis. This review will provide an overview of the prevalence and anatomical characteristics of patients with aortic stenosis and small annulus. Additionally, we will discuss current treatment options, including surgery and TAVI, used to mitigate procedural and long-term adverse outcomes in this group.

Late Clinical Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Valves in Small Annuli: Results From the PARTNER Trials

BACKGROUND

Short-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are similar in individuals with small or large annuli. The longer term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and mean gradient (MG) post-TAVR in these patients remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate 5-year outcomes in patients with small vs large annuli.

METHODS

Patients from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2 SAPIEN 3 intermediate-risk registry and the PARTNER 3 low-risk randomized controlled trial were grouped according to small (≤430 mm2) or large (>430 mm2) annular size. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization. In addition, the relationships between both PPM and post-TAVR MG and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,355 patients were included: 476 with small annuli (376.7 ± 41.9 mm2) and 879 with large annuli (518.3 ± 58.0 mm2). Patients with small annuli were older (age 79.6 ± 7.1 years vs 78.7 ± 7.8 years; P = 0.047), were more often female (75.0% vs 16.2%; P < 0.0001), had higher baseline Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores (4.3% ± 1.93% vs 4.0% ± 1.93%; P < 0.0001), and had higher left ventricular ejection fractions (66.3% ± 15.82% vs 59.7% ± 13.68%; P < 0.0001). Primary endpoint rates were similar at 1 year (7.8% vs 8.0%; P = 0.94) and 5 years (36.3% vs 35.8%; P = 0.83). Bioprosthetic valve failure was infrequent at 5 years in both groups (2.9% vs 2.1%; P = 0.46). Among female patients, outcomes were similar for small vs large annuli (primary endpoint; 33.6% vs 34.2%; P = 0.90). Among patients with small annuli, there was no association between 5-year outcomes and any severity of PPM (P = 0.22) or 30-day MG (P for nonlinearity = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year clinical outcomes were excellent and comparable between patients with small vs large aortic annuli. Outcomes in patients with small annuli were not affected by 30-day MG or PPM.

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch: Current State of Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) remains a significant concern in valve intervention. This review highlights the current evidence surrounding PPM, compares its impact after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and addresses ongoing debates in the literature regarding valve selection, procedural strategies, and future approaches to improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence highlights that moderate to severe PPM is associated with increased mortality and adverse cardiac events, particularly in younger, active patients and those with smaller aortic annuli. Studies have emphasized the role of optimized prosthesis sizing, advanced imaging modalities, and next-generation valve technologies in mitigating PPM. Additionally, TAVI appears to outperform surgical approaches in reducing severe PPM, particularly in high-risk populations. Despite significant progress, PPM remains a persistent challenge in valve intervention procedures, particularly among patients with smaller aortic annuli and those at risk for suboptimal hemodynamic performance. Addressing this issue requires continued innovation in prosthesis design, including valves with improved hemodynamic profiles and more sizing options. Long-term research is essential to better understand the clinical impact of PPM, evaluate valve durability across various types, and develop strategies to prevent its occurrence.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small and Very Small Aortic Valve Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Between Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves

BACKGROUND

The management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) patients with a small aortic annulus (SAA) postures a substantial challenge, increasing the risk of patient- prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and overall mortality.

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter balloon-expandable valve (BEV) versus transcatheter self-expandable valve (SEV) in SAA.

METHODS

We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) of severe AS patients with SAA who underwent trans-femoral TAVR and enrolled to the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2008 and 2023. SAA was defined as an aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 430 mm2. Since the BEV used have a smaller size cut-off, an additional analysis on very small aortic annulus (vSAA) as defined as aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 345 mm2 was performed.

RESULTS

The study included 1364 consecutive patients with SAA of (BEV n = 485; SEV n = 879) at a mean age of 82 ± 7 years, of whom the vast majority were female (83%). Propensity-matched groups comprised of 329 and 122 paired for the SAA and vSAA patients, respectively. As compared to BEV in the SAA and vSAA analyses, SEV showed lower rates of postprocedural of LBBB (32% vs. 22% and 41% vs. 22%; both p < 0.01, respectively), however, higher rates of major vascular complications (2% vs. 7% and 2% vs. 12%; both p < 0.01, respectively) and major or life-threatening bleeding but only in vSAA group (17% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.009). One-month mortality was higher in the SEV versus BEV in both SAA and vSAA comparisons (2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.048 and 3% vs. 0%, p = 0.018; respectively). A nonsignificant trend of higher 5-year mortality was observed in univariate models, noted mainly in vSAA patients (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.385; 24% vs. 15%, p = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis observed higher rates of major vascular complications and 1-month mortality in SAA and vSAA treated with SEV. A similar nonsignificant trend toward long-term mortality for the vSAA group was observed and should be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus: A meta-analysis with reconstructed time to event data

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) remains a prevalent and serious global health concern, exacerbated by an aging population worldwide. This valvular disease, when symptomatic and without appropriate intervention, severe AS can drastically reduce life expectancy. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to synthesize available evidence to guide clinical decision-making by comparing the performance of TAVR and SAVR, specifically in patients with severe AS and a small aortic annulus.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception till May 2024. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) are provided as effect size estimates, with all analyses being conducted using RevMan 5.4.

Results

Eleven studies with 3,670 patients were included. TAVR significantly increased the risk of 2-year new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (RR = 2.42; 95 % CI: [1.70-3.44], P < 0.0001) and major vascular complications (RR = 3.73; 95 % CI: [1.98-6.99], P < 0.0001) than SAVR. However, TAVR significantly decreased the risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (RR = 0.56; 95 % CI: [0.48-0.65], P < 0.00001) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (RR = 0.31; 95 % CI: [0.23-0.41], P < 0.00001). Also, SAVR reduced the risk of paravalvular leak (PVL) (RR = 3.35; 95 % CI: [1.79-6.27], P = 0.0002).

Conclusion

TAVR had a significantly reduced risk of PPM and new-onset AF but with increased PPI and vascular complications. Also, TAVR significantly improved EOA and iEOA. Furthermore, SAVR had less risk of PVL, and better LVEF improvement at predischarge. Therefore, TAVR and SAVR remain valid alternatives, and decisions should be based on anatomy of the annulus and aortic root,operative risk, and comorbidities.

Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Position Statement on the Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Management of Aortic Stenosis

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as an effective treatment modality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and the uptake of TAVI is rapidly growing in the Asia-Pacific region. However, there exist a heterogeneity in the management of aortic stenosis and the use of TAVI among countries in the region. Reasons for these differences include anatomic variations, disparity in healthcare resources and infrastructure, and the lack of consensus on the optimal management of AS in the Asia-Pacific region. Hence, an Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) working group, including a multidisciplinary group of general and interventional cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, imaging specialists, developed a position statement on the recommendations for TAVI in the management of aortic stenosis. The APSC expert panel reviewed and appraised the available evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Recommendations were developed and put to an online vote. Consensus was reached when 80% of votes for a given recommendation were in support of "agree" or "neutral." The resulting 28 statements provide guidance for clinical practitioners in the region on the use of TAVI in the treatment of patients with aortic stenosis.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by Valve Type in Women With Small Annuli: Results From the SMART Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Historically, women with aortic stenosis have experienced worse outcomes and inadequate recognition compared to men, being both underdiagnosed and undertreated, while also facing underrepresentation in clinical trials.

Objective

To determine whether women with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement have better clinical and hemodynamic outcomes with a self-expanding valve (SEV) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV).

Design, Setting, Participants

The Small Annuli Randomized to Evolut or SAPIEN Trial (SMART) was a large-scale randomized clinical trial focusing on patients with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, randomized to receive SEVs or BEVs and included 716 patients treated at 83 centers in Canada, Europe, Israel, and the US from April 2021 to October 2022. This prespecified secondary analysis reports clinical and hemodynamic findings for all 621 women enrolled in SMART. Data for this report were analyzed from February to April 2024.

Interventions

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an SEV or a BEV.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The composite coprimary clinical end point comprised death, disabling stroke, or heart failure-related rehospitalization. The coprimary valve function end point was the incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, both assessed through 12 months. Secondary end points included the incidence of moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Results

A total of 621 women (mean [SD] age, 80.2 [6.2] years; 312 randomized to the SEV group and 309 to the BEV group) were included in the present analysis. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in the coprimary clinical end point between the SEV and BEV groups (9.4% vs 11.8%, absolute risk difference -2.3%; 95% CI -7.2 to 2.5, P = .35). However, SEV implantation was associated with less bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (8.4% vs 41.8%; absolute risk difference, -33.4%; 95% CI, -40.4 to -26.4; P < .001). SEV implantation resulted in lower aortic valve gradients and larger effective orifice areas at 30 days and 12 months and less mild or greater aortic regurgitation at 12 months compared to BEV implantation. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower with SEVs, regardless of the definition used and adjustment for body mass index. Use of SEVs was associated with better quality of life outcomes as assessed by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 ordinal quality of life measure.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the use of SEVs, compared to BEVs, resulted in similar clinical outcomes and a markedly reduced incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction through 12 months, including a lower risk of prosthesis-patient mismatch and better 12-month quality of life.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04722250.

Impact of Small Aortic Annuli on the Performance of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Bioprostheses: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Recent Studies

A metanalysis of available randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) bioprostheses in patients with small aortic annulus and aortic stenosis for short- and midterm hemodynamic and clinical outcomes was performed. A total of 21 studies with a total 8,647 patients (SE: n = 4,336 patients vs BE: n = 4,311 patients) were included. SE bioprostheses had a lower postoperative mean gradient at 30 days (Mean Difference [MD] -5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7 to 5.5, p <0.001) and at 1 year (MD -6.6, 95%CI 6.1 to 7.03, p <0.001), with a larger indexed effective orifice area (0.17, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.22, p <0.001 and 0.17, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.27, p <0.001) at both time intervals. BE bioprostheses had a higher risk of 30-day and 1-year severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.09, p <0.001; RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.11, p <0.001). The 30-day and 1 year paravalvular leaks (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99, p <0.001; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95, p <0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, p 0.01, I2 = 40%,) were lower in the BE group. BE bioprostheses were associated with a lower risk of in-hospital stroke (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1, p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with small aortic annulus and aortic stenosis, SE bioprostheses have superior hemodynamic performance but higher rates of paravalvular leak, permanent pacemaker implantation, and in-hospital stroke. BE bioprostheses were associated with a higher risk of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Small Aortic Annulus: A Systematic Literature Review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis. The small aortic annulus is one of the most challenging aspects of aortic stenosis treatment and since the beginning, TAVI has shown promising results in this subgroup of patients. This systematic literature review aims to investigate the short and long-term outcomes of TAVI in the small aortic annulus. The literature was meticulously screened for this topic until April 2024 using the PRISMA guidelines. Technical aspects, characteristics of this subgroup of patients, hemodynamic performances, and outcomes are discussed. The importance of device selection has shown up, with insight into the differences between self-expandable and the balloon-expandable valves. Two special populations were also taken into account: outcomes of TAVI in the small aortic annulus with bicuspid aortic valve and extra-small aortic annulus. The last 10 years have been paramount in technological advancements, bringing TAVI to broader use in this population. While several important trials underscored the usefulness of TAVI in the small aortic annulus population, the clinical practice still lacks consensus on the ideal device, and the outcomes are debated. The pivotal role of TAVI in this context needs to be addressed with a patient-tailored approach to optimize patient care.

Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) being currently employed in low surgical risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). The durability and extended outcomes of TAVR as compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low-risk patients remains uncertain.

Methods

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in low surgical risk patients having severe AS using online databases. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes were composite of all-cause death & disabling stroke, cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement, new onset atrial fibrillation (AF), valve re-intervention and valve thrombosis. The outcomes were stratified at short- (1-year) and intermediate-term (≤5 years) follow-up. We used a random effect model to report outcomes as relative risk (RR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

The analysis consisted of six RCTs comprising 5,122 subjects with a mean age of 75.4 years. At short-term follow up, there was a significant reduction in all-cause death (RR: 0.62, 0.46-0.82, p = 0.001) and composite of all-cause death and disabling stroke (RR: 0.62, 0.45-0.83, p = 0.002) in patients undergoing TAVR. At intermediate-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in survival (RR:0.95, 0.73-1.24, p = 0.71) and composite outcome (RR: 0.95, 0.74-1.22, p = 0.71). TAVR patients had lower incidence of new onset AF, however, higher PPM placement.

Conclusion

In patients with severe AS having low-surgical risk, patients undergoing TAVR had improved short-term survival as compared to SAVR. This survival advantage was absent at intermediate-term follow-up. The long-term outcomes remain uncertain.

Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis: From the Pathophysiology to the Intervention, Current Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. AS presents sex-specific features impacting pathophysiology, outcomes, and management strategies. In women, AS often manifests with a high valvular fibrotic burden, small valvular annuli, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling/hypertrophy, and, frequently, supernormal LV ejection fraction coupled with diastolic dysfunction. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS epitomizes these traits, posing significant challenges post-aortic valve replacement due to limited positive remodeling and significant risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Conversely, men present more commonly with LV dilatation and dysfunction, indicating the phenotype of classical low-flow low-gradient AS, i.e., with decreased LV ejection fraction. However, these distinctions have not been fully incorporated into guidelines for AS management. The only treatment for AS is aortic valve replacement; women are frequently referred late, leading to increased heart damage caused by AS. Therefore, it is important to reassess surgical planning and timing to minimize irreversible cardiac damage in women. The integrity and the consideration of sex differences in the management of AS is critical. Further research, including sufficient representation of women, is needed to investigate these differences and to develop individualized, sex-specific management strategies.

Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Women With Small Annuli at Low or Intermediate Surgical Risk

There are limited data from randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgery in women with aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli. We evaluated 2-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement to understand acute valve performance and early and midterm clinical outcomes. This post hoc analysis pooled women enrolled in the randomized, prospective, multicenter Evolut Low Risk and Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (SURTAVI) intermediate risk trials. Women with severe aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk who had a computed tomography-measured annular perimeter of ≤72.3 mm were included and underwent self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR or surgery. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate. The study included 620 women (323 TAVR, 297 surgery) with a mean age of 78 years. At 2 years, the all-cause mortality or disabling stroke was 6.5% for TAVR and 8.0% for surgery, p = 0.47. Pacemaker rates were 20.0% for TAVR and 8.3% for surgery, p <0.001. The mean effective orifice area at 2 years was 1.9 ± 0.5 cm2 for TAVR and 1.6 ± 0.5 cm2 for surgery and the mean gradient was 8.0 ± 4.1 versus 12.7 ± 6.0 mm Hg, respectively (both p <0.001). Moderate or severe patient-prothesis mismatch at discharge occurred in 10.9% of patients who underwent TAVR and 33.2% of patients who underwent surgery, p <0.001. In conclusion, in women with small annuli, the clinical outcomes to 2 years were similar between self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR and surgery, with better hemodynamics in the TAVR group and fewer pacemakers in the surgical group.

Severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement with Perimount in Western Denmark 2016-2022: a nationwide retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The healthcare registries in Denmark present a unique opportunity to gain novel insights into the outcomes associated with both transcatheter and surgical approaches to aortic valve replacement. Our objective is to enhance shared decision-making by comparing long-term mortality and clinical outcomes between treatments.

METHODS

This observational study included all patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing elective isolated transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in Western Denmark between January 2016 and April 2022. Patient population and clinical data were identified from the Western Danish Heart Registry and the National Danish Patient Registry, respectively. A propensity score-matched population was generated. Outcomes were investigated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3.

RESULTS

A total of 2269 TAVI patients and 1094 SAVR patients where identified. The propensity score-matched population consisted of 468 TAVI patients (mean[SD]age, 75.0[5.3] years) and 468 SAVR patients (mean[SD] age, 75.1[4.6]years). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for the 5-year all-cause mortality was 29.8% in the TAVI group and 16.9% for in the SAVR group (P = 0.019). The risk of all stroke or transient ischaemic attack after five year was 15.1% in the TAVI group and 11.0% in the SAVR group (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of evaluating all patient factors when choosing an aortic valve replacement method. Surgical aortic valve replacement was an excellent choice, especially for patients with New York Heart Association class I/II, ≥75 age, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, or longer life expectancy.

Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Over the course of 2023, numerous key clinical trials with valuable contributions to clinical cardiology were published or presented at major international conferences. This review seeks to summarise these trials and reflect on their clinical context.

METHODS

The authors collated and reviewed clinical trials presented at major cardiology conferences during 2023 including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EuroPCR), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT), American Heart Association (AHA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), TVT-The Heart Summit (TVT) and Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT). Trials with a broad relevance to the cardiology community and those with potential to change current practice were included.

RESULTS

A total of 80 key cardiology clinical trials were identified for inclusion. Key trials in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and antiplatelet management such as HOST-IDEA, T-PASS and STOP-DAPT3 were included in addition to several pivotal interventional trials such as ORBITA 2, MULTISTARS-AMI, ILUMIEN-IV, OCTIVUS and OCTOBER. Additionally, several trials evaluated new stent design and technology such as BIOSTEMI, PARTHENOPE and TRANSFORM. Structural intervention trials included long-term data from PARTNER 3, new data on the durability of transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI), in addition to major new trials regarding transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention from TRISCEND II. Heart failure (HF) and prevention covered several key studies including DAPA-MI, STEP-HF, ADVOR, DICTATE HF and CAMEO-DAPA. In cardiac devices and electrophysiology, several trial exploring novel ablation strategies in atrial fibrillation (AF) such as PULSED AF and ADVENT were presented with further data evaluating the efficacy of anticoagulation in subclinical AF in NOAH-AFNET 6, FRAIL AF and AZALEA-TIMI 71.

CONCLUSION

This article presents a summary of key clinical cardiology trials published and presented during the past year and should be of interest to both practising clinicians and researchers.