Planning After Stroke Survival: Advance Care Planning in the Stroke Clinic

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care in Older Adults With Stroke: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States and may result in cognitive impairment and the inability to participate in treatment decisions, attesting to the importance of advance care planning (ACP). Although racial and ethnic differences have been shown for ACP in the general population, little is known about these differences specific to patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to examine the presence of ACP and receipt of life-prolonging care by race and ethnicity among decedents who had suffered a stroke.

METHODS

We used the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative longitudinal survey. We conducted a cohort study of decedents who died between 2000 and 2018 using multivariable logistic regression models to explore the association between self-reported ethnicity and race and completion of ACP (including a living will [LW] and durable power of attorney for healthcare [DPOAH]) and receipt of life-prolonging care at end of life, controlling for covariates. Stratified models for each race and ethnicity also were conducted.

RESULTS

This study included 3,491 decedents with a reported history of stroke; 57.4% were women, and the mean age was 81.5 years (SD = 10.2). Decedents who identified as non-Hispanic White had the highest end-of-life planning rates (LW: 57%, DPOAH: 72%, and ACP conversation: 63%) compared with those identifying as non-Hispanic Black (LW: 20%, DPOAH 40%, and ACP conversation: 41%) and Hispanic (LW: 20%, DPOAH: 36%, and ACP conversation: 42%; p < 0.001). The presence of ACP discussions, LW, and DPOAH was associated with lower odds of receiving life-prolonging care at end-of-life among non-Hispanic White decedents (OR = .64, CI = .447-0.904; OR = .30, CI = .206-0.445; OR = .61, CI = .386-0.948) but not among those who identified as Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black decedents with stroke had significantly lower rates of ACP discussions, LWs, and naming a DPOAH compared with those who identified as non-Hispanic White. In addition, ACP activities were inversely associated with receipt of life-prolonging care among non-Hispanic White decedents, but not among those who identified as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic. Small ethnic/racial subgroup sizes limit the generalizability of this study.

Early Integration of Palliative Care in Nononcological Patients: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care (PALC) is traditionally linked to end-of-life cancer care but also benefits advanced nononcological diseases.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review evaluated the impact of early PALC on quality of life (QOL), symptom management, advance care planning (ACP), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among nononcological patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical studies published between January 2018 and April 2023. Participants were adult patients with nononcological diseases exposed to PALC interventions compared to usual care. Outcomes included QOL, symptom management, ACP, and HRU. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included involving 1118 patients. Early PALC positively affects pain interference and fatigue in heart failure (HF) patients and time until first readmission and days alive outside the hospital in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. Benefits were noted in symptom burden for patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), anxiety and depression in stroke patients, and ACP in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. However, results for anxiety and depression in HF patients are inconsistent, and no significant differences in QOL were observed in HF, ESLD, IPF, and COPD. The intervention did not improve overall QOL in HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of early PALC on health outcomes in nononcological diseases is inconsistent. Addressing barriers to early PALC integration and conducting further high-quality research are essential for optimizing care pathways and enhancing patient outcomes.

Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study

Background: Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Objectives: To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. Methods: We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would "definitely" or "probably" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.

Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on palliative care needs specific to stroke and provide key points for clinicians and health care systems caring for patients with stroke and their families.

METHODS

Members of the writing group were chosen to represent the multidisciplinary team of professionals who care for people who have had a stroke. Each member was assigned a topic within their area of expertise, reviewed the literature, and drafted content with a focus on the past decade to complement the 2014 American Heart Association scientific statement on palliative and end-of-life care in stroke.

RESULTS

Stroke has multidimensional effects on patients and their families because of threats to personhood, prognostic uncertainty, and the need to adapt to functional changes after stroke. Palliative care has evolved as both a specialty and a skillset with a goal to improve communication about goals of care and quality of life for patients and their families that emphasizes a holistic, all-person approach. After stroke, palliative care needs (eg, to address pain and physical, emotional, psychosocial, and spiritual distress) are insufficiently addressed by current models of care. Integrating palliative care principles is fundamental in all stages of stroke and should include strategies to improve communication about prognosis and goals of care, address psychosocial needs such as coping with loss, navigating complex health care systems, and preparing for death when necessary. We also review strategies to address the substantial inequities that exist across sociodemographic and regional strata in the use of life-sustaining treatment and access to specialists in stroke or palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care needs are common after stroke and should be addressed throughout the illness continuum. Research is urgently needed.

Advance Care Planning Among Sexual Minority Men: Sociodemographic, Health Care, and Health Status Predictors

Objectives: Advance care planning (ACP) specifies decision-making surrogates and preferences for serious illness or end-of-life medical care. ACP research has largely neglected sexual minority men (SMM), a population that experiences disparities in health care and health status. Methods: We examined formal and informal ACP among SMM ages 40+ in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (N = 1,071). Results: For informal ACP (50%), younger SMM and men with past cardiovascular events had greater odds of planning; single men had lower odds of planning. For formal ACP (39%), SMM with greater socioeconomic status had greater odds of planning; SMM who were younger, of racial/ethnic minority identities, who were single or in a relationship without legal protections, and who lacked a primary care home had lower odds of planning. Discussion: Findings warrant further exploration of both informal and formal planning. More equitable, culturally-humble engagement of SMM may facilitate access, uptake, and person-centered planning.

Advance directives among community-dwelling stroke survivors

OBJECTIVE

Advance directives (ADs) are integral to health care, allowing patients to specify surrogate decision-makers and treatment preferences in case of loss of capacity. The present study sought to identify determinants of ADs among stroke survivors.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study (Care Attitudes and Preferences in Stroke Survivors [CAPriSS]), community-dwelling stroke survivors were surveyed on ADs; validated scales were used to query palliative care knowledge and attitudes towards life-sustaining treatments. Logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with ADs.

RESULTS

Among 562 community-dwelling stroke survivors who entered the survey after screening questions confirmed eligibility, 421 (74.9%) completed survey components with relevant variables of interest. The median age was 69 years (IQR 58-75 years); 53.7% were male; and 15.0% were Black. Two hundred and fifty-one (59.6%) respondents had ADs. Compared to stroke survivors without ADs, those with ADs were more likely to be older (median age 72 vs. 61 years; p<0.001), White (91.2% vs. 75.9%, p<0.001), and male (58.6% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.015), and reported higher education (p<0.001) and income (p = 0.011). Ninety-eight (23.3%) participants had "never heard of palliative care". Compared to participants without ADs, participants with ADs had higher Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) scores (median 10 [IQR 5-12] vs. 7 [IQR 0-11], p<0.001), and lower scores on the Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments Scale (indicating a more negative attitude towards life-sustaining treatments; median 23 [IQR 18-28] vs. 29 [IQR 24-35], p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified age (OR 1.62 per 10 year increase, 95% CI 1.30-2.02; p<0.001), prior advance care planning discussion with a physician (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.04-2.86; p = 0.034), PaCKS scores (OR 1.06 per 1 point increase, 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p = 0.018), and Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments Scale scores (OR 0.91 per 1 point increase, 95% CI 0.88-0.95; p<0.001) as variables independently associated with ADs.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, prior advance care planning discussion with a physician, palliative care knowledge, and attitudes towards life-sustaining treatments were independently associated with ADs.

Palliative care after stroke survival

Stroke is a leading cause of both death and disability worldwide. While most research has focused on the first hours to days after acute stroke, much less is known about the experience of patients and their families living after a stroke. Stroke survivors have a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and depression that are often not addressed in the postacute setting. Similarly, goals-of-care conversations that may have started during the acute hospitalization are often not followed up later. This chapter outlines the prevalence and management of common poststroke symptoms, approaches to postacute goals-of-care conversations, family needs after stroke, and provides an overview of stroke-specific hospice and end-of-life care aspects. We emphasize the need for research in each of these areas.

Palliative care approaches to acute stroke in the hospital setting

Stroke is a prevalent neurologic condition that portends a high risk of morbidity and mortality such that patients impacted by stroke and their caregivers can benefit from palliative care at the time of diagnosis and throughout the disease trajectory. Clinicians who care for stroke patients should be adept at establishing rapport with patients and caregivers, delivering serious news, responding to emotions, discussing prognosis, and establishing goals of care efficiently in an acute stroke setting. Aggressive stroke care can be integrated with a palliative approach to care that involves aligning the available treatment options with a patient's values and goals of care. Reassessing the goals throughout the hospitalization provides an opportunity for continued shared decision-making about the intensity of poststroke interventions. The palliative needs for stroke patients may increase over time depending on the severity of disease, poststroke complications, stroke-related symptoms, and treatment intensity preferences. If the decision is made to transition the focus of care to comfort, the support of an interdisciplinary palliative care or hospice team can be beneficial to the patient, family members, and surrogate decision makers.

Palliative Care for Older Adults Hospitalized for Stroke From the Informal Caregivers' Perspectives

BACKGROUND

International guidelines have promoted palliative care (PC) for stroke survivors, but definition and implementation have been less than ideal. This practice gap is more prominent in China, where discussion of death remains taboo.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of PC among caregivers of hospitalized patients with stroke.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A descriptive qualitative study design was used. Seventeen in-depth interviews with bedside caregivers in a first-rank tertiary hospital (general hospital with bed capacity exceeding 500) in China were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

"Promoting comfort" stands at the core of PC and was operationalized by "meeting physical care needs," "ensuring communication," "providing psychoemotional care," "providing cognitive stimulation," and "avoiding discussion on death and dying." Caregivers who took care of older adults for a long time have described the use of "cognitive stimulation" to promote patients' positive emotional and cognitive reactions. All interviewees avoided mentioning "death" to protect patients' feelings, because they believed discussion of death was hurtful.

CONCLUSIONS

The high care demand for patients with stroke is a defining feature of stroke PC and should be recognized in addition to its prognosis estimation to promote this concept. The healthcare system should integrate PC as part of the regular service for patients with severe stroke to shift the focus of care from survival to promotion of comfort. A discussion of the dying process requires sensitivity and should be approached in a discussion of advanced PC planning, which views death as a meaningful transition.

Choosing Wisely: Canadian Neurological Society recommendations for advance care planning

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process to understand and communicate one's wishes, values, and preferences for future medical care. As part of the Choosing Wisely Canada "Time to Talk" initiative, the Canadian Neurological Society (CNS) endorsed the creation of a working group to propose ACP recommendations for patients with neurological illness. A narrative review of primary literature on ACP in neurological and non-neurological illness, medical society guidelines, and publications by patient advocacy groups was conducted. Eight ACP recommendations were deemed relevant and important to Canadian neurology practice and were approved by the CNS Board of Directors. The recommendations are meant to serve as guidance for Canadian neurologists, to stimulate discussion about ACP within the Canadian neurology community, and to encourage neurologists to engage in ACP conversations with their patients.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Strokes

Stroke is a common cause of long-term disability and death, which leaves many patients with significant and unique palliative care (PC) needs. Shared decision-making for patients with stroke poses distinct challenges due to the sudden nature of stroke, the uncertainty inherent in prognostication around recovery, and the common necessity of relying on surrogates for decision-making. Patients with stroke suffer from frequently underrecognized symptoms, which PC clinicians should feel comfortable identifying and treating. This article provides 10 tips for palliative clinicians to increase their knowledge and comfort in caring for this important population.

Neuropalliative Care in the Inpatient Setting

The palliative care needs of inpatients with neurologic illness are varied, depending on diagnosis, acuity of illness, available treatment options, prognosis, and goals of care. Inpatient neurologists ought to be proficient at providing primary palliative care and effective at determining when palliative care consultants are needed. In the acute setting, palliative care should be integrated with lifesaving treatments using a framework of determining goals of care, thoughtfully prognosticating, and engaging in shared decision-making. This framework remains important when aggressive treatments are not desired or not available, or when patients are admitted to the hospital for conditions related to advanced stages of chronic neurologic disease. Because prognostic uncertainty characterizes much of neurology, inpatient neurologists must develop communication strategies that account for uncertainty while supporting shared decision-making and allowing patients and families to preserve hope. In this article, we illustrate the approach to palliative care in inpatient neurology.

End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the United States. Though advances in interventions have improved patient survival after stroke, prognostication of long-term functional outcomes remains challenging, thereby complicating discussions of treatment goals. Stroke patients who require intensive care unit care often do not have the capacity themselves to participate in decision making processes, a fact that further complicates potential end-of-life care discussions after the immediate post-stroke period. Establishing clear, consistent communication with surrogates through shared decision-making represents best practice, as these surrogates face decisions regarding artificial nutrition, tracheostomy, code status changes, and withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapies. Throughout decision-making, clinicians must be aware of a myriad of factors affecting both provider recommendations and surrogate concerns, such as cognitive biases. While decision aids have the potential to better frame these conversations within intensive care units, aids specific to goals-of-care decisions for stroke patients are currently lacking. This mini review highlights the difficulties in decision-making for critically ill ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage patients, beginning with limitations in current validated clinical scales and clinician subjectivity in prognostication. We outline processes for identifying patient preferences when possible and make recommendations for collaborating closely with surrogate decision-makers on end-of-life care decisions.

Palliative care after stroke: A review

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is an integral aspect of stroke unit care. In 2016, the American Stroke Association published a policy statement on palliative care and stroke. Since then there has been an expansion in the literature on palliative care and stroke.

AIM

Our aim was to narratively review research on palliative care and stroke, published since 2015.

RESULTS

The literature fell into three broad categories: (a) scope and scale of palliative care needs, (b) organization of palliative care for stroke, and (c) shared decision making. Most literature was observational. There was a lack of evidence about interventions that address specific palliative symptoms or improve shared decision making. Racial disparities exist in access to palliative care after stroke. There was a dearth of literature from low- and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSION

We recommend further research, especially in low- and middle-income countries, including research to explore why racial disparities in access to palliative care exist. Randomized trials are needed to address specific palliative care needs after stroke and to understand how best to facilitate shared decision making.

Planning After Stroke Survival: Advance Care Planning in the Stroke Clinic

Background

Stroke survivors have high rates of mortality and recurrent stroke. Stroke patients are often unable to participate in decision making, highlighting the need for advance care planning (ACP) in poststroke care. We sought to better understand experiences and perceptions around stroke risk and ACP in our stroke clinic.

Methods and Results

Clinic patients completed the Planning After Stroke Survival survey assessing (1) advance directive (AD) documentation and ACP conversations, (2) factors associated with ADs and ACP, (3) perceptions of stroke risk, and (4) ACP needs. We used a physician survey and the electronic medical record to assess clinical and demographic information. We collected 219 surveys (78% response rate). Forty‐five percent reported having completed ADs, although the correlation between patient report and EMS documentation of ADs was low. Most patients (73%) had discussed ACP, and 58% desired additional conversation. Predictors of completing ADs included age (≥65 years; odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.3–10.1), white race (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2–7.8), milder poststroke disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1; odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3–6.4), having previously discussed ACP with a physician (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.0–11.7), and discussing risk of stroke recurrence (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1–4.5).

Conclusions

Stroke survivors had low AD completion rates and desired more conversations about stroke risk and ACP. Completed ADs were inconsistently documented in the electronic medical record. These findings provide guidance to improve ACP in our stroke clinic and may provide a model for others interested in enhancing ACP and ultimately goal‐concordant care.