Do Women Require Less Permanent Pacemaker After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation? A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Comparative Prognostic Value of Risk Factors for Predicting Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

This study compares the prognostic value of risk factors for Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until November 2024 for studies reporting PPI incidence within 30 days post-TAVR. A random-effect model was used to pool risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SDM) for binary and continuous risk factors. Network meta-analysis estimated pooled risk differences (ΔRR) for binary predictors with male sex as the reference. Significant predictors were ranked based on their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. A total of 108 studies comprising 77,538 patients (14,560 requiring PPI) were included. Male sex (RR: 1.13), baseline atrial fibrillation (AF) (RR: 1.12), 2nd degree Mobitz I (RR: 5.16) and Mobitz II (RR: 2.30) atrioventricular blocks (AVB), 3rd degree AVB (RR: 13.46), left anterior (LAHB) (RR: 1.79) and posterior hemiblocks (LPHB) (RR: 2.57), bifascicular block (RR: 2.34), right bundle branch block (RBBB) (RR: 3.20) and intraprocedural AVB (RR: 4.15) were identified as predictors for PPI post-TAVR. The risk of PPI was higher with self-expandable valves (RR: 1.79), subclavian access (RR: 1.75), and 29 mm prostheses (RR: 1.33) compared to balloon-expandable valves, transfemoral access, and 23 mm prostheses. Network meta-analysis ranked 3rd degree AVB (SUCRA <0.01), Mobitz I AVB (SUCRA: 0.14), Mobitz II AVB (SUCRA: 0.33), intraprocedural AVB (SUCRA: 0.42), bifascicular block (SUCRA: 0.48), RBBB (SUCRA: 0.49) and LPHB (SUCRA: 0.54) as major predictors of PPI in descending order of significance. In conclusion, clinicians should closely monitor conduction abnormalities as key predictors of PPI following TAVR. Additionally, other risk factors such as subclavian access, self-expanding implantation, AF, large prosthesis diameter, and male sex should not be overlooked.

The Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Supraventricular and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently experience electrical disturbances, such as ventricular or atrial fibrillation (AF). Sacubitril/Valsartan (SV) therapy has been linked to lower rates of mortality, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF), with decreased reliance on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, studies on the antiarrhythmic effects of SV in patients with ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SV therapy on antiarrhythmic pacing, defibrillation shock occurrences, and the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF who have ICD or CRT-D devices.

METHOD

This study was conducted at a HF outpatient clinic involving patients with HFrEF treated with SV. Primary outcomes included the incidence of VT, VF, non-sustained VT (NsVT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and related interventions such as antiarrhythmic pacing (ATP) and defibrillation shocks.

RESULT

A total of 181 HFrEF patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with a mean age of 63.39 ± 12 years; 36.5% were male, and 60.8% had an ICD. Device interrogation revealed a significant reduction in VF incidents (7 vs. 15, p = 0.025) and a decrease in the combined outcome of VT and VF (17 vs. 24, p = 0.047). The need for ICD interventions such as ATP and shocks also significantly decreased following the initiation of SV therapy (10 vs. 24, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

SV therapy significantly reduces the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly VT and VF, while decreasing the need for clinical interventions related to implanted devices.

Aortic Stenosis: Time for a Sex-Based Approach?

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive form of valvular heart disease most commonly associated with aging, with an exponential increase in prevalence after age 50. While men have historically been considered at higher risk, recent studies highlight a similar prevalence between men and women, with a higher prevalence in elderly women driven by longer life expectancy. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation, anatomy, and pathophysiology influence disease progression, severity assessment, and management. Women are often diagnosed at more advanced stages, exhibiting more pronounced symptoms, typically dyspnea and functional impairment, whereas men more often report chest pain. Women have a smaller body surface area, leading to smaller aortic annuli, left ventricular outflow tracts, aortic roots impacting flow dynamic, and severity grading. Diagnostic challenge contributes to the undertreatment of women. Despite experiencing severe AS, women receive fewer interventions and face delays in treatment. The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improved outcomes, with studies suggesting a potential advantage in women compared to men. However, the anatomical differences, such as smaller annuli and more tortuous vascular access, necessitate tailored procedural approaches. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is essential to optimizing AS management, ensuring timely interventions, and improving patient outcomes. Future strategies should incorporate sex-specific thresholds for diagnosis and treatment while leveraging technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence, for personalized therapeutic decisions.

Prevalence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives were to identify the predictors of new permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The secondary objectives were to investigate the temporal changes in permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI and its impact on long-term prognosis.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study of patients with AS undergoing TAVI.

SETTING

Single-centre study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Western Norway between 2012 and 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Among 600 consecutive patients with severe AS who were treated with TAVI, 52 patients with permanent pacemaker prior to TAVI were excluded. The remaining 548 patients were included in the present study.

BASELINE MEASURES

An evaluation of baseline risk factors, 12-lead ECG and echocardiography.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The need for a new pacemaker implantation ≤30 days following TAVI and all-cause death.

RESULTS

The mean age was 80.6±6.7 years, and 50% were males. Among the 548 eligible patients, 173 (31.6%) underwent pacemaker implantation ≤30 days following TAVI, evenly distributed between females and males (29.6% vs 33.6%, p=0.317), with higher implant rates at low-volume phase (2012-2015) and lower implant rates at high-volume phase (2016-2019) (45.8% vs 23.9%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, an abnormal electrocardiogram (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.63, p=0.010), right bundle branch block (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.09 to 4.59, p=0.028) and atrial fibrillation (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.88, p=0.003) at baseline were strong predictors of pacemaker implantation. The type of bioprosthesis, but not size, was associated with permanent pacemaker implantation (mechanically expandable valves OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.59; balloon-expandable valves OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.29, both p<0.001)-irrespective of age and sex. During a median follow-up of 60.4 months (range 3-131 months), permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.16, p=0.403).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, the rates of permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI decreased substantially from the early low-volume phase to the late high-volume phase. An abnormal baseline ECG, right bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation and bioprosthesis selection remained important predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation. Permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI had no impact on short or long-term survival.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (approval number: REK vest 33814/2019) and the Institutional Data Protection Services approved the study protocol. The dissemination of study findings was through peer-reviewed publication, presentation at national and international scientific meetings and conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04417829.

Sex-specific anatomic differences in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the ST-TAVI registry

OBJECTIVE

The anatomic considerations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an important role for the procedure planning; however, sex-specific data are lacking.

METHODS

All eligible cases undergoing evaluation for TAVI procedure in the period from November 2019 to July 2023 at the University Hospital of Split were included. Cardiac computed tomography was analyzed to derive the measures of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic root, ascending aorta, and ilio-femoral arteries. A sex-based comparison was conducted using the descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There were 140 female (43.8%) and 180 male patients (56.2%). Female patients had smaller dimensions of aortic annulus (area 391.9 vs. 491.5 mm2, p < 0.001), LVOT (area 373.3 vs. 481.8 mm2, p < 0.001), and ascending aorta (maximal diameter 32.7 vs. 34.5 mm, p < 0.001), as well as ilio-femoral arteries bilaterally (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for transfemoral TAVI procedure, as measured by diameter of ilio-femoral arteries <5.0 mm (9.0% in males vs. 6.1% in females, p = 0.441) and <5.5 mm (24.7% in males vs. 16.7% in females, p = 0.156). Female patients were more likely to receive the smallest valve across different valve platforms (p < 0.001). There were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms (p < 0.001). Female patients had significantly higher periprocedural mortality (7.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.030), whereas there were no differences in other clinical outcomes and no association of periprocedural mortality with anatomic measures.

CONCLUSION

Female patients showed smaller absolute dimensions of LVOT, aortic root, and ilio-femoral arteries than male patients. There were no differences in the prevalence of ilio-femoral unfeasibility for the transfemoral TAVI procedure; however, there were sex-specific differences in the availability of conventional valve sizes across different platforms. Female patients exhibited a higher periprocedural mortality, with no difference in other clinical outcomes.

Sex-Related Differences in the Pathophysiology, Cardiac Imaging, and Clinical Outcomes of Aortic Stenosis: A Narrative Review

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries, and its prevalence is higher in older patients. Clinical studies have shown gender disparity in the pathogenesis and the progression of aortic stenosis. This disparity has led to several overwhelming questions regarding its impact on the clinical outcomes and treatment of the disease and the requirement of personalized sex-specific approaches for its management. Indeed, aortic stenosis differs in the pathophysiological response to pressure overload created by the stenosis in women compared to men, which would translate into differences in cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes. Several studies have focused on understanding the differences regarding disease progression according to biological gender and have found that sex hormones play a crucial role. Sex hormones affect many metabolic processes, thus activating crucial cell signaling and energy metabolism through mitochondrial activity. Yet, there is still a significant gap in knowledge on how biological sex influences the pathophysiology of AS. In this review, we have discussed studies that point to the role of sex-related physiological differences in the molecular pathways and the clinical presentation of the disease and outcome in women and men. We used the format of narrative review to review and summarize the body of literature without being systematic but with taking great care of considering the most impactful data available to date on the topic, especially randomized trials, metanalyses, and prospective studies and registries when available, as well as experimental studies with rigorous methodological approaches regarding the basic mechanisms and pathophysiology of the disease in women compared to men. The opinion of the authors on a particular issue or finding was expressed when appropriate for clarification.

Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis: From the Pathophysiology to the Intervention, Current Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. AS presents sex-specific features impacting pathophysiology, outcomes, and management strategies. In women, AS often manifests with a high valvular fibrotic burden, small valvular annuli, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling/hypertrophy, and, frequently, supernormal LV ejection fraction coupled with diastolic dysfunction. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS epitomizes these traits, posing significant challenges post-aortic valve replacement due to limited positive remodeling and significant risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Conversely, men present more commonly with LV dilatation and dysfunction, indicating the phenotype of classical low-flow low-gradient AS, i.e., with decreased LV ejection fraction. However, these distinctions have not been fully incorporated into guidelines for AS management. The only treatment for AS is aortic valve replacement; women are frequently referred late, leading to increased heart damage caused by AS. Therefore, it is important to reassess surgical planning and timing to minimize irreversible cardiac damage in women. The integrity and the consideration of sex differences in the management of AS is critical. Further research, including sufficient representation of women, is needed to investigate these differences and to develop individualized, sex-specific management strategies.

The influence of gender on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Objectives

This study aimed to compare gender-related differences in short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Methods

Patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) from September 2017 to December 2022 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 5-year all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality and the incidence of post-procedural complication. Patients were separated according to gender before statistical analysis. To compare patients with similar baseline characteristics, we performed a propensity matching.

Results

A total of 704 patients [females, 361 (51.3%); males, 343 (48.7%)] were enrolled. Compared to women, men had a higher incidence of smoking (40.5% vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001), diabetes (32.9% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.025), peripheral artery disease (35.8% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and previous cardiac surgery (13.7% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.006) and a lower ejection fraction [56.6 (9.3) vs. 59.8 (7.5), p = 0.046]. Female patients were frailer at the time of the procedure [poor mobility rate, 26% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001; CCI (Charlson comorbidity index) 2.4 (0.67) vs. 2.32 (0.63), p = 0.04]. Despite these different risk profiles, no significant differences were reported in terms of post-procedural outcomes and long-term survival. Propensity score matching resulted in a good match of 204 patients in each group (57.9% of the entire study population). In the matched cohort, men had a significantly higher incidence of new pacemaker implantation compared to women [33 (16.2%) vs. 18 (8.8%)]. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival estimate was 82.4% for women and 72.1% for men, p = 0.038.

Conclusions

Female gender could be considered as a predictor of better outcomes after TAVI.

Prognosis and Predictor Factors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis of the Post-Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Clairval Hospital Registry

Background/Objectives: Despite procedural improvements, post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) conduction disorders remain high. Analyzing the data from a monocentric TAVR registry, this study aims to determine predictive factors for PPI (primary outcome), the indication for PPI, and long-term outcomes among these patients (secondary outcomes). Methods: Conducted at Clairval Hospital in Marseille, France, this retrospective study included all consecutive patients from June 2012 to June 2019. Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and procedural data were collected, with outcomes assessed annually. Logistic regression identified PPI predictors and survival analyses were performed. Results: Of the 1458 patients initially considered, 1157 patients were included. PPI was needed in 21.5% of patients, primarily for third-degree atrioventricular block (46.4%). Predictor factors for PPI included baseline right bundle branch block (ORadj 2.49, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.30; p = 0.001), longer baseline QRS duration (ORadj 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to1.02, p = 0.002), and self-expandable valves (ORadj 1.82, 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.03; p = 0.021). Seven-year estimated mortality was higher in PPI (43.3%) vs. non-PPI patients (30.9%) (log rank p = 0.048). PPI was an independent predictive factor of death (ORadj 2.49, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3; p = 0.002). Conclusions: This study reveals elevated rates of PPI post-TAVR associated with increased mortality. These results underscore the pressing necessity to refine our practices, delineate precise indications, and enhance the long-term prognosis for implanted patients.

Sex-Related Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves: Insights from the OPERA-TAVI Registry

Evidence regarding gender-related differences in response to transcatheter aortic valve implantation according to the valve type is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gender on the treatment effect of Evolut PRO/PRO+ (PRO) or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (ULTRA) devices on clinical outcomes. The Comparative Analysis of Evolut PRO vs SAPIEN 3 Ultra Valves for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OPERA-TAVI) is a multicenter, multinational registry including patients who underwent the latest-iteration PRO or ULTRA implantation. Overall, 1,174 of 1,897 patients were matched based on valve type and compared according to gender, whereas 470 men and 630 women were matched and compared according to valve type. The 30-day and 1-year outcomes were evaluated. In the PRO and ULTRA groups, men had a higher co-morbidity burden, whereas women had smaller aortic root. The 30-day (device success [DS], early safety outcome, permanent pacemaker implantation, patient-prosthesis mismatch, paravalvular regurgitation, bleedings, vascular complications, and all-cause death) and 1-year outcomes (all-cause death, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization) did not differ according to gender in both valve groups. However, the male gender decreased the likelihood of 30-day DS with ULTRA versus PRO (p for interaction = 0.047). A higher risk of 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation and 1-year stroke and a lower risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch was observed in PRO versus ULTRA, regardless of gender. In conclusion, gender did not modify the treatment effect of PRO versus ULTRA on clinical outcomes, except for 30-day DS, which was decreased in men (vs women) who received ULTRA (vs PRO).

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) marks a significant advancement in treating aortic stenosis (AS), especially for patients with high surgical risks. This concise review outlines TAVR's development, its broader application to include lower-risk patients, and innovations in the device and procedural technology. Clinical trials, notably the PARTNER series, affirm TAVR's efficacy, showing it matches or surpasses surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in mortality reduction, hemodynamic benefits, and symptom alleviation, including heart failure. However, TAVR entails complications such as paravalvular leakage (PVL), conduction disorders, and increased cerebrovascular event risks. We evaluate these issues, their prevalence, causative factors, and clinical consequences, emphasizing improvements in valve design and technique that have significantly lowered PVL rates. The role of aortic valve anatomy and calcification in PVL and conduction issues is analyzed, underlining the necessity for meticulous patient selection and procedural planning. Further, the review delves into cerebrovascular event risks, their origins, and preventative strategies, including cerebral protection devices and the judicious use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. TAVR presents a less invasive, promising alternative to SAVR, but requires careful complication management to optimize patient results. Ongoing innovation and research are vital for advancing TAVR's techniques, improving valve designs, and extending its reach, thereby enhancing AS patients' quality of life.

Geographical and socioeconomic disparities in post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement pacemaker placement

INTRODUCTION

Pacemaker (PPM) implantation is indicated for conduction abnormalities which can develop post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, whether post-TAVR PPM risk is associated with the geographical location of the hospital and socioeconomic status of the patient is not well established. Our goal was to explore geographical and socioeconomic disparities in post-TAVR PPM implantation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020 with respective ICD-10 codes for TAVR and PPM implantation. A weighted multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of patients hospitalized for undergoing TAVR was 296,740, out of which 28,265 patients had PPM implantation (prevalence 9.5 %). Patients' demographics including sex, ethnicity, household income, and insurance were not associated with risk of post-TAVR PPM except age (OR 1.01, CI 1.07-12.5, p < 0.001). Compared to rural hospitals, urban non-teaching hospitals were associated with a higher risk of post-TAVR PPM (OR 2.09, 1.3-3.43, p = 0.003). Compared to New England hospitals (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT), middle Atlantic hospitals (NY, NJ, PA) were associated with highest post-TAVR PPM risk (OR 1.54, CI 1.2-1.98, p < 0.001), followed by Pacific (AK, WA, OR, CA, HI), mountain (ID, MT, WY, NV, UT, CO, AZ, NM) and east north central US.

CONCLUSION

Patients' demographics including sex, ethnicity, household income, and insurance were not associated with the risk of post-TAVR PPM except for age. Compared to New England hospitals, Middle Atlantic hospitals were associated with the highest post-TAVR PPM risk followed by Pacific, Mountain, and East North Central US. Prospective studies with data on TAVR wait times, expertise of the interventional staff, and post-TAVR management and discharge planning are required to further explore the observed regional distribution of TAVR outcomes.

Post-TAVR conduction abnormalities leading to permanent pacemaker implantation: Risk factors, prevention, and management

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often leads to conduction abnormalities, necessitating pacemaker implantation. This review of 38 meta-analyses identified preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB), LAHB, and new-onset left bundle branch block as key risk factors, with a higher PPM risk in male and older patients. Procedural factors like transfemoral access and self-expandable valves also increase this risk. Prevention focuses on tailoring TAVR to individual electrophysiological and anatomical profiles. However, there's a lack of consensus in managing these conduction disturbances post-TAVR, highlighting the need for further research and standardized treatment strategies.

Unique Aspects of Women's Valvular Heart Diseases: Impact for Diagnosis and Treatment

Valvular heart diseases (VHDs) are a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. As degenerative and functional mechanisms represent the main etiologies in high-income countries are degenerative and functional, while in low income countries etiologie is mostly rheumatic. Although therapeutic options have evolved considerably in recent years, women are consistently diagnosed at later stages of their disease, are delayed in receiving surgical referrals, and exhibit worse postoperative outcomes, compared to men. This difference is a result of the historical underrepresentation of women in studies from which current guidelines were developed. However, in recent years, important research, including more female patients, has been conducted and has highlighted substantial sex-specific differences in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of VHDs. Systematic consideration of these sex-specific differences in VHD patients is crucial for providing equitable healthcare and optimizing clinical outcomes in both female and male patients. Hence, this review aims to explore implications of sex-specific particularities for diagnosis, treatment options, and outcomes in women with VHDs.

Sex differences in permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the effect of sex on permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the role of sex among patients requiring PPMI post-TAVR.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for studies published until October 2022. Eligible studies included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Observational Cohort Studies (OCS) articles that reported PPMI as an outcome of pacemaker status following TAVR. This study was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Publication bias was estimated using a Funnel plot and Egger's test. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was the sex difference in PPMI after TAVR, with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) extracted.

RESULTS

Data was obtained from 63 studies, and a total of 79,655 patients were included. The cumulative PPMI rate was 15.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%). The pooled analysis revealed that while there were more females than males undergoing TAVR (51.6%, 95% CI 50.4%-52.8%), males have a 14.5% higher risk for post-TAVR PPMI than females (OR 1.145, 95% CI 1.047-1.253, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Males are more likely to experience PPMI after TAVR than females. Further research needs to be done to better explain these observed differences in outcomes.

Sinus node dysfunction and related permanent pacemaker implantation after major cardiac surgeries, systematic review, and meta-analysis

Background

There is no concise evidence or clinical guidelines regarding the incidence of sinus node dysfunction (SND) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following cardiac surgeries and their management approaches.

Objective

We aim to systematically review current evidence on the prevalence of SND, PPM implantation concerning it, and its risk factors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Method

Four electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for articles regarding SND after cardiovascular surgeries and reviewed by two independent researchers, and a third review in case of discrepancies. Using the random-effects model, a proportion meta-analysis was performed on data regarding PPM implantation. Subgroup analysis was performed for different interventions, and the possible effect of different covariates was evaluated using meta-regression.

Results

From the initial 2012 unique records, 87 were included in the study, and results were extracted. Pooled data from 38,519 patients indicated that the overall prevalence of PPM implantation due to SND after cardiac surgery was 2.87% (95% CI [2.09; 3.76]). The incidence of PPM implantation in the first post-surgical month was 2.707% (95% CI [1.657; 3.952]). Among the four main intervention groups, including valve, maze, valve-maze, and combined surgeries, maze surgery was associated with the highest prevalence (4.93%; CI [3.24; 6.92]). The pooled prevalence of SND among studies was 13.71% (95% CI [8.13; 20.33]). No significant relationship was observed between PPM implantation and age, gender, cardiopulmonary bypass time, or aortic cross-clamp time.

Conclusion

Based on the present report, patients undergoing the maze and maze-valve procedures are at higher risk of post-op SND, whereas lone valve surgery had the lowest prevalence of PPM implantation.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022341896).

Sex differences in aortic stenosis: Identification of knowledge gaps for sex-specific personalized medicine

Objectives

This review summarizes sex-based differences in aortic stenosis (AS) and identifies knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.

Background

AS is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries. Sex-specific differences have not been fully appreciated, as a result of widespread under diagnosis of AS in women.

Summary

Studies including sex-stratified analyses have shown differences in pathophysiology with less calcification and more fibrosis in women's aortic valve. Women have impaired myocardial perfusion reserve and different compensatory response of the left ventricle (LV) to pressure overload, with concentric remodeling and more diffuse fibrosis, in contrast to men with more focal fibrosis and more dilated/eccentrically remodeled LV. There is sex difference in clinical presentation and anatomical characteristics, with women having more paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient AS, under-diagnosis and severity underestimated, with less referral to aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to men. The response to therapies is also different: women have more adverse events with surgical AVR and greater survival benefit with transcatheter AVR. After AVR, women would have more favorable LV remodeling, but sex-related differences in changes in myocardial reserve flow need future research.

Conclusions

Investigation into these described sex-related differences in AS offers potential utility for improving prevention and treatment of AS in women and men. To better understand sex-based differences in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and response to therapies, sex-specific critical knowledge gaps should be addressed in future research for sex-specific personalized medicine.

Treatment of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Impact of Patient Sex and Life Expectancy on Treatment Choice

In adults with severe aortic stenosis, sex and age differences in symptoms and diagnosis may lead to delays in intervention. Choice of intervention partly depends on expected longevity because bioprosthetic valves have limited durability, particularly in younger patients. Current guidelines recommend the following: a mechanical valve in younger adults (aged <50 years) if lifelong anticoagulation is possible and acceptable and a valve-sparing procedure is not possible; surgical mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in adults aged 50-65 years; and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for those aged >80 years based on lower mortality and morbidity compared to SAVR and adequate valve durability. For patients aged 65-80 years, the choice between TAVI and a bioprosthetic SAVR depends on expected longevity, which is greater in women than men, as well as associated cardiac and noncardiac conditions, valvular and vascular anatomy, estimated risk of SAVR versus TAVI and expected complications and patient preferences.

Do Women Require Less Permanent Pacemaker After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation? A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Background

Limited clinical evidence and literature are available about the potential impact of sex on permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this work was to evaluate the relationship between sexes and atrioventricular conduction disturbances requiring PPI after TAVI.

Methods and Results

Data were obtained from 46 studies from PubMed reporting information about the impact of patient sex on PPI after TAVI. Total proportions with 95% Cls were reported. Funnel plot and Egger test were used for estimation of publication bias. The primary end point was 30‐day or in‐hospital PPI after TAVI, with odds ratios and 95% CIs extracted. A total of 70 313 patients were included, with a cumulative proportion of 51.5% of women (35 691 patients; 95% CI, 50.2–52.7). The proportion of women undergoing TAVI dropped significantly over time (P<0.0001). The cumulative PPI rate was 15.6% (95% CI, 13.3–18.3). The cumulative rate of PPI in women was 14.9% (95% CI, 12.6–17.6), lower than in men (16.6%; 95% CI, 14.2–19.4). The risk for post‐TAVI PPI was lower in women (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84–0.96 [P=0.0022]). By meta‐regression analysis, age (P=0.874) and ventricular function (P=0.302) were not significantly associated with PPI among the sexes. Balloon‐expandable TAVI significantly decrease the advantage of women for PPI, approaching the same rate as in men (P=0.0061).

Conclusions

Female sex is associated with a reduced rate of PPI after TAVI, without influence of age or ventricular function. Balloon‐expandable devices attenuate this advantage in favor of women. Additional investigations are warranted to elucidate sex‐based differences in developing conduction disturbances after TAVI.