Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Effectiveness of Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone versus Hydrocortisone Alone in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rationale: The use of hydrocortisone in adult patients with septic shock is controversial, and the effectiveness of adding fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone remains uncertain. Objectives: To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone, hydrocortisone alone, and placebo or usual care in adults with septic shock. Methods: A systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis of peer-reviewed randomized trials were conducted. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at last follow-up. Treatment effects are presented as relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Placebo or usual care was the reference treatment. Measurements and Main Results: Among 7,553 references, we included 17 trials (7,688 patients). All-cause mortality at last follow-up was lowest with fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.72-0.99; 98.3% probability of superiority, moderate-certainty evidence), followed by hydrocortisone alone (RR, 0.97; 95% CrI, 0.87-1.07; 73.1% probability of superiority, low-certainty evidence). The comparison of fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone alone was based primarily on indirect evidence (only two trials with direct evidence). Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone was associated with a 12% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with hydrocortisone alone (RR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.74-1.03; 94.2% probability of superiority, moderate-certainty evidence). Conclusions: In adult patients with septic shock, fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at last follow-up than placebo and hydrocortisone alone. The scarcity of head-to-head trials comparing fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone versus hydrocortisone alone led our network meta-analysis to rely primarily on indirect evidence for this comparison. Although we undertook several sensitivity analyses and assessments, these findings should be considered while also acknowledging the heterogeneity of included trials.

Sotagliflozin and Kidney Outcomes, Kidney Function, and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes and CKD: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORED Trial

BACKGROUND

In the initial analysis of the Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial, because of early trial termination and suspension of adjudication, reconciliation of eGFR laboratory data and case report forms had not been completed. This resulted in a small number of kidney composite events and a nominal effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on this outcome. This exploratory analysis uses laboratory eGFR data, regardless of case report form completion, to assess the effects of sotagliflozin on the predefined kidney composite end point in the SCORED trial and additional cardiorenal composite end points.

METHODS

SCORED was a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating cardiorenal outcomes with sotagliflozin versus placebo in 10,584 patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. This exploratory analysis used laboratory data to derive the eGFR components and case report form data for the non-laboratory-defined components that together made up the kidney and cardiorenal composites. AKI was also assessed in this dataset.

RESULTS

Using laboratory data, 223 events were identified, and sotagliflozin reduced the risk of the composite of first event of sustained ≥50% decline in eGFR, eGFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , dialysis, or kidney transplant with 87 events (1.6%) in the sotagliflozin group and 136 events (2.6%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.62 [0.48 to 0.82]), P < 0.001). Sotagliflozin reduced the risk of a cardiorenal composite end point defined as the abovementioned composite plus cardiovascular or kidney death with 239 events (4.5%) in the sotagliflozin group and 306 events (5.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.77 [0.65 to 0.91], P = 0.0023). The results were consistent when using different eGFR decline thresholds and when only including kidney death in composites (all P < 0.01). The incidence of AKI was similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory analysis using the complete laboratory dataset, sotagliflozin reduced the risk of kidney and cardiorenal composite end points in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315143 .

SGLT2 Inhibitors in Management of Severe Hypomagnesemia in Patients Without Diabetes: A Report of 4 Cases

Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated a class effect in improving serum magnesium levels in patients with diabetes. Additionally, recent reports have shown their promising beneficial effects in the treatment of refractory hypomagnesemia in patients with diabetes. However, their role in treating hypomagnesemia in patients without diabetes remains unexplored. Here, we report 4 cases of severe and refractory hypomagnesemia that showed dramatic improvement after initiating SGLT2 inhibitors in patients without diabetes. Case 1 had calcineurin inhibitor-associated severe hypomagnesemia. Cases 2, 3, and 4 had refractory hypomagnesemia associated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without gastrointestinal losses. Case 1 was able to withdraw from high-dose oral magnesium supplementation. Cases 2 and 3 achieved independence from intravenous magnesium supplementation, whereas case 4 had decreased intravenous magnesium requirements. All the cases demonstrated sustainably improved serum magnesium levels. Withdrawal of SGLT2 inhibitors in case 4 resulted in worsening serum magnesium levels and intravenous magnesium requirements. The extraglycemic benefit of this group of medications not only suggests the need for further studies to better understand the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on magnesium homeostasis but also supports expanded use in a larger patient population.

Cardiovascular Diseases: Therapeutic Potential of SGLT-2 Inhibitors

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a global health concern, affecting millions of patients worldwide and being the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, thus creating a major public health concern. Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of medications for managing CVD. Initially developed as antihyperglycemic agents for treating type 2 diabetes, these drugs have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control. In our paper, we discuss the role of empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and the relatively recently approved bexagliflozin, the class of SGLT-2 inhibitors, as potential therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases. All mentioned SGLT-2 inhibitors have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits and renal protection in clinical trials, in patients with or without type 2 diabetes. These novel therapeutic approaches aim to develop more effective treatments that improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of these conditions. However, the major scientific achievements of recent years and the many new discoveries and mechanisms still require careful attention and additional studies.

The risk of all-cause death with dapagliflozin versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dapagliflozin has proven cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects. However, the risk of all-cause death with dapagliflozin remains unclear.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the risk of all-cause death and safety events with dapagliflozin compared to placebo. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to 20 September 2022.

RESULTS

Five trials were included in the final analysis. Compared with the placebo, dapagliflozin demonstrated an 11.2% reduction in the risk of all-cause death (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.94). No statistically significant difference in urinary tract infection (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.17), bone fracture (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.20), and amputation (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.23) was observed between patients treated with dapagliflozin and placebo. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction in acute kidney injury (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.83), and increased the risk of genital infection (OR: 8.21, 95% CI: 4.19 to 16.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin was associated with significantly reduced all-cause death and increased genital infection. Dapagliflozin was safe concerning urinary tract infection, bone fracture, amputation, and acute kidney injury, compared with the placebo.

Effects of Dapagliflozin in Combination with Metoprolol Sustained-Release Tablets on Prognosis and Cardiac Function in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction after PCI

Objective

To find the effects of dapagliflozin in combination with metoprolol sustained-release tablets on cardiac function and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients after PCI.

Methods

A total of 84 patients with myocardial infarction who experienced PCI from February 2020 to February 2022 were included and allocated into 3 groups: groups A, B, and C (n = 28/per group). Group A was given dapagliflozin combined with metoprolol sustained-release tablets, group B was given dapagliflozin, and group C was given the placebo. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (EDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and end systolic diameter (ESD) were measured before and after treatment in all groups; myocardial infarction areas were matched among all three groups at 3 months posttreatment. The serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were detected in all three groups before and after treatment. The levels of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), and secreted frizzled-related protein 5 (SFRP5) were also detected in the serum of all groups. Adverse reactions and cardiovascular adverse events were matched between all groups.

Results

The levels of LVEF in groups A and B were increased after treatment, while the levels of EDD and ESD were decreased. The improvement degree of LVEF and EDD levels in groups A and B was found greater compared to group C (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in myocardial infarction area among the three groups at 3 months postoperation (P > 0.05). Serum concentrations of MDA, hs-CRP, IL-6, IMA, NT-proBNP, and Lp(a) were found to decrease in all three groups after treatment, while the levels of SOD and SFRP5 were increased. The improvement degree of serum hs-CRP, IL-6, SOD, MDA, IMA, NT-proBNP, Lp(a), and SFRP5 levels was greater in both groups A and B compared to group C. The improvement degree of serum hS-CRP, SOD, MDA, IMA, Nt-probNP, Lp(a), and SFRP5 levels was significantly greater in group A compared to group B (P < 0.05). No adverse effect was observed in all three groups (P > 0.05). Total occurrence of cardiovascular adverse effects such as stent thrombosis, heart failure, ventricular fibrillation, and death was 10.71% in group A, 25.00% in group B, and 53.75% in group C. There was statistical significance in the onset of cardiovascular adverse effects 3 months postoperation among all three groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Dapagliflozin with metoprolol sustained-release tablets can be effective in improving the heart function, inflammatory response, oxidative stress response, and prognosis in patients after PCI.

New Therapeutic Options for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact Against Ischemic Heart Disease

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) greatly increases risk for cardiovascular disease, including ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. With the completion of several cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) for new glucose-lowering therapies, including the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, we now have strong evidence alluding to the cardioprotective nature of these agents in people with T2DM. These agents have frequently been observed to reduce rates for 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events, which encompass death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Herein we will provide an overview on whether reductions in nonfatal myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease status are a key component of the improved cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2DM treated with either SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1R agonists. Observations from preclinical studies will be compared to their clinical counterparts, while being further interrogated to define potential mechanisms that may account for SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1R agonist-induced cardioprotection against ischemic heart disease. A better understanding of the role these agents have in impacting the progression of ischemic heart disease in individuals with T2DM will have a substantial impact in our management of this patient population.

Empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Evidence from several large clinical trials

Heart failure coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which seriously affects the clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, the treatment for patients with established heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus is usually combined with two treatment strategies for heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently, increasing studies showed that empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, has a positive effect on the treatment of patients with established heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we summarize the latest and current understanding of the management for patients with established heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus and further present contemporary treatment options, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, for these particular populations.