Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet functions: a literature review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many epidemiological studies have evidenced an increased bleeding risk associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This review summarizes data on SSRIs' effects on platelet functions assessed with assays used in clinical practice and highlights the areas that deserve further investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conflicting results of SSRI effects on platelet aggregation were observed irrespectively of the agonist used, the antidepressant drug or the study type. Alike, discrepant results were reported with flow-cytometry-based assays assessing either platelet surface glycoprotein levels, integrin activation, agonist-induced secretion of intraplatelet granule content or membrane anionic phospholipid exposure. Other tests may have detected a platelet function defect in SSRIs samples, however, results were largely inconsistent.

SUMMARY

Critical literature examination unveils very low certainty of evidence on potential SSRI effect on platelet functions. Findings are often inconsistent even when similar methods are used, most likely because of differences in study design, included patients (age, comorbid conditions), SSRIs' type and dose, uncontrolled confounding factors, and statistical analysis power. Further studies are needed to disentangle any intrinsic antiplatelet effect of SSRIs and the multiple confounding factors, mainly the depression control itself and the degree of platelet SERT inhibition.

Exploring the correlation between cardiovascular adverse events and antidepressant use: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

BACKGROUND

The high comorbidity and mutually reinforcing relation between depression and cardiovascular disease have raised concerns about the cardiovascular risk of antidepressants. To gain a better understanding of this correlation, we performed a comprehensive evaluation regarding the types and degrees of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with 37 commonly prescribed antidepressants.

METHODS

AE reports from January 2004 to December 2023 were retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify antidepressant-related cardiovascular signals using the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and information component. Influencing factors of cardiovascular death, including age, sex, antidepressant choice, and concomitant medication, were explored. The underlying mechanisms of antidepressant-associated cardiovascular risk related to neurotransmitter transporters/receptors were further explored.

RESULTS

The use of antidepressants was associated with eight categories of Standardized MedDRA Queries of cardiovascular events. Different antidepressants exerted varying types and degrees of cardiovascular risks along with contributions to death in reports with cardiovascular AEs. Among them, monoamine oxidase inhibitors had the highest risk of developing six cardiovascular event categories: torsades de pointes (TdP)/QT prolongation, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, and ischaemic heart disease. Age, male and the use of 24 types of antidepressants and concomitant medications were positively correlated with death in cardiovascular AEs. The highest risk associated with antidepressants was found in amoxapine (OR = 5.00 [2.13, 11.75], P < 0.001), followed by moclobemide (OR = 3.66 [1.85, 7.24], P < 0.001). Correlation analysis indicated the occurrence of antidepressant-related TdP/QT prolongation, hypertension and cardiomyopathy was associated with the binding and uptake inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters as well as their selectivity over serotonin transporters.

CONCLUSION

The retrospective analysis revealed that cardiovascular AEs were connected with antidepressant use, and the binding/uptake inhibitory potency and selectivity of neurotransmitters of antidepressants played an important role, providing a preliminary basis for further in-depth study of antidepressant-related cardiovascular toxicity. However, as an exploratory study, prospective studies are needed to validate our findings in the future.

Is SSRI use a risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy for tumor resection?

Introduction

Prior studies have identified SSRI use as a risk factor for certain adverse bleeding outcomes. However, the risk of significant bleeding from perioperative SSRI use after brain tumor resection remains largely undetermined. This study evaluates if patients taking SSRIs perioperatively have a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following elective craniotomy for tumor resection.

Methods

Researchers reviewed electronic medical records of patients age 18 and older, who received elective craniotomy for tumor resection between 2010 and 2019. Data collection included subject demographics and relevant medical history. We compared intracranial hemorrhage rates and risks between perioperative SSRI-use cohorts.

Results

Of 1,061 patients, 796 (75%) did not use SSRIs perioperatively while 265 (25%) used SSRIs perioperatively. Among those using perioperative SSRIs, 8 patients (3.0%) experienced an ICH within 1 week and 11 patients (4.2%) had an ICH within 1 month. Similarly, for those who stopped SSRI use perioperatively, we found 31 patients (3.9%) experienced an ICH within 1 week and 40 patients (5.0%) had an ICH within 1 month. Using logistic regression analysis, the relative risk for perioperative SSRI-use and ICH was statistically non-significant at 0.692 (95% CI: 0.260 - 1.839, p = 0.460).

Conclusions

Based on our results, perioperative SSRI use does not appear to result in an increased risk of bleeding within 1 week or month of craniotomy for tumor resection. These results remained consistent when controlled for several additional bleeding comorbidities and demographics between cohorts.

Bleeding in patients on concurrent treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with SSRI or low-dose ASA alone-A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to systematically review whether concurrent treatment with an SSRI and low-dose ASA increases the risk of bleeding compared with treatment with an SSRI alone or ASA alone.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science (from database inception to January 2023) were searched according to PICO: P = patients on treatment with an SSRI and/or low-dose ASA; I = intervention: SSRI + ASA; C = comparison: ASA or SSRI alone; O = outcomes: bleeding/major bleeding. The included articles were assessed using checklists. Studies without major risk of bias formed the basis for the conclusions. Extracted data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the PICO and were included. One randomized and six nonrandomized studies were assessed not to have major risk of bias. Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. ASA only, the pooled hazard ratio of three nonrandomized studies (n = 38 467) was 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.10; 1.70; I2 = 0%), and the pooled odds ratio of two nonrandomized studies (n = 28 296) was 0.95 (0.77; 1.19; I2 = 0%). Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. SSRI only, the randomized controlled trial (n = 1048) reported a hazard ratio of 1.82 (0.66; 5.02), the hazard ratio being 1.60 (1.24; 2.06) for ASA vs. placebo in patients without SSRI treatment; and one nonrandomized controlled study (n = 18 920) reported an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (0.96; 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The compiled evidence was too uncertain to support an interaction when an SSRI is added to low-dose ASA. Low-dose ASA added to an SSRI may imply an increased risk of bleeding primarily attributable to the initiation of ASA.

Associations Between Drug Treatments and the Risk of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

There is increasing interest in drug therapy for preventing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between drug use and the risk of aSAH. We searched PubMed and Scopus from the databases' inception until December 2021. Observational studies reporting the association between any drug therapy and aSAH were included. The odds ratios (ORs) for each drug used in aSAH were meta-analyzed with a random-effect model. According to the systematic review, 25 observational studies were eligible for the present study. Four therapeutic purpose-based classes (e.g., lipid-lowering agents) and 14 mechanism-based classes (e.g., statins) were meta-analyzed. Anti-hypertensive agents (OR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.33-0.74), statins (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.85), biguanides (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.96), and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94) were inversely associated with the risk of aSAH. Non-ASA non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.07-2.79), selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.24-3.35), vitamin K antagonists (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.18-1.91), and dipyridamole (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.23-2.54) were positively associated with the incidence of aSAH. There was also a trend toward a positive association between glucocorticoids (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.97-1.94) and aSAH. The present study suggests that anti-hypertensive agents, statins, biguanides, and ASA are candidate drugs for preventing aSAH. By contrast, several drugs (e.g., anti-thrombotic drugs) may increase the risk of aSAH. Thus, the indications of these drugs in patients with intracranial aneurysms should be carefully determined.

Use of serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants and the risk of bleeding complications in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) antidepressants are implicated in increasing the risk of bleeding among users; however, the comparative increase in bleeding risk with concurrent antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) remains unclear. As such, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available evidence to evaluate the effects of SRI and the risk of bleeding complications among patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and grey literature (Google Scholar and preprint reports) up to 26 November, 2020, with no language restrictions (updated on 31 July 2021). The primary outcome of interest was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and any bleeding events. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We did not identify any randomised studies but found 32 non-randomized studies (cohort or case-control) with 1,848,285 patients that fulfilled the study selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Among individuals receiving anticoagulants (13 studies), SRI users experienced a statistically higher risk of major bleeding compared to non-SRI users: pooled OR was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.23-1.58; p < .001; moderate heterogeneity). Among individuals receiving antiplatelet therapy (2 studies), SRI users were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding: pooled OR was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.17-1.80; p = .001; low heterogeneity). For secondary outcomes, the use of SRI among individuals treated with antithrombotic therapy revealed a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or any bleeding events, whereas only anticoagulant use was illustrated an increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SRI antidepressants among patients treated with antithrombotic therapy (either anticoagulant or antiplatelet) is associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications, suggesting that caution is warranted in co-prescription.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42018083917KEY MESSAGESIn this meta-analysis of 32 non-randomized studies, SRI users were associated with the risk of bleeding complications compared to non-SRI users, with concurrent antithrombotic use (either anticoagulant or antiplatelet).The risk was consistently elevated across types of bleeding events (major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, or any bleeding events), whereas only anticoagulant use was associated with intracranial haemorrhage.To promote the rational use of medicines, our findings suggest that the risk-benefit ratio must account for the clear efficacy of SRI against safety concerns in terms of bleeding risks.

Major Bleeding Risk in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Concurrently Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Antidepressants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antidepressants that may increase bleeding risk. Here we assessed the association between DOACs with and without concurrent antidepressants and major bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by a retrospective cohort study included patients with AF who received prescriptions of DOACs in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database between 2012 and 2017. Adjusted rate ratio (ARR) of major bleeding was calculated by comparing incidence rate adjusted with Poisson regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score between patient-times with and without antidepressants. Among 98863 patients with AF, concurrent use of bupropion with DOACs increased the risks of all major bleeding (ARR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02–2.16) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (ARR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.04–2.33). An increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was associated with the combinations of DOACs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, ARR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08–1.76), particularly in paroxetine (ARR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17–3.81), and tetracyclic antidepressants (TeCAs, ARR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.78). In subgroup analyses stratified by individual NOACs, SSRIs increased the risk of ICH in the dabigatran-treated patients (ARR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.04–2.33). The combinations of apixaban and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were associated with a higher risk of all major bleeding (ARR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.04–2.55). These results clearly indicate the drug–drug interactions between DOACs and antidepressants, which should be carefully considered when prescribing DOACs in adult patients. Careful monitoring for bleeding should be performed while concurrently prescribing DOACs with bupropion, SSRI, SNRI, and TeCA. Concomitant use of DOACs and TCAs may be a relatively safe strategy for patients with AF.

Influences of antidepressant medications on the risk of developing hyperlipidemia in patients with depression by a population-based cohort study and on in vitro hepatic lipogenic-related gene expression

BACKGROUND

Depression increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The association between antidepressant medications (ADMs) and CVD remains controversial. Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for CVD. We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study to examine depression and ADM use on the risk of developing hyperlipidemia. The effects of ADMs on the expression of lipogenesis-related hepatic genes were also evaluated.

METHODS

We obtained data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan on patients with new-onset depression and a comparison cohort without depression. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the differences in the risk of developing hyperlipidemia between these two cohorts. We also examined the influence of ADMs on the expression of lipogenesis-related hepatic genes.

RESULTS

After adjustment for comorbidities and confounding factors, the case group (N = 38,322) had a higher risk for hyperlipidemia than that of the control cohort (N = 38,322) [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) =1.16]. Patients with depression who did not receive ADM therapy exhibited a significantly higher risk of hyperlipidemia (aHR = 1.61). However, in patients with depression treated with ADMs, the risk of developing hyperlipidemia was significantly lowered compared to the patients without ADMs (all aHR < 0.81). Gene expression analysis indicated that ADMs downregulated the expression of lipogenesis-related hepatic genes.

LIMITATIONS

Unmeasured confounding risk factors for hyperlipidemia might not have been included in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

ADMs reduced hyperlipidemia risk in patients with depression, partly by downregulating the expression of lipogenesis-related genes and improving the patients' lipid profiles. Early diagnosis and management of hyperlipidemia would further facilitate the prevention of CVD.

Serotonergic Antidepressants and Risk for Traumatic Intracranial Bleeding

Background: Serotonergic antidepressants may predispose to bleeding but the effect on traumatic intracranial bleeding is unknown. Methods: The rate of intracranial bleeding in patients with antidepressant medication was compared to patients not antidepressants in a cohort of patients with acute head injury. This association was examined by using a consecutive cohort of head trauma patients from a Finnish tertiary center emergency department (Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland). All consecutive (2010-2012) adult patients (n = 2,890; median age = 58; male = 56%, CT-positive = 22%, antithrombotic medication users = 25%, antidepressant users = 10%) who underwent head CT due to head trauma in the emergency department were included. Results: Male gender, GCS <15, older age, and anticoagulation were associated with an increased risk for traumatic intracranial bleeding. There were 17.8% of patients not taking antidepressants and 18.3% of patients on an antidepressant who had traumatic intracranial bleeding (p = 0.830). Among patients who were taking antithrombotic medication, 16.6% of the patients not taking antidepressant medication, and 22.5% of the patients taking antidepressant medication, had bleeding (p = 0.239). In a regression analysis, traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was not associated with antidepressant use. Conclusions: Serotonergic antidepressant use was not associated with an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

[Depression therapy for somatic diseases]

A review of works devoted to the problem of psychopharmacotherapy of depression in general medical practice is presented. The issues of its comorbidity with somatic and neurological diseases, as well as multimorbidity are discussed. Both direct and side-effects of antidepressants, which are important for effective therapy of not only affective disorders proper, but also the symptoms of the leading pathology, are considered in detail for individual organs and systems. The analysis of the preferred pharmacological classes of antidepressants, which are drugs of first choice, taking into account the somatic condition of the patient, is carried out, and drugs are indicated, the appointment of which is undesirable for the treatment of a patient with a certain disease. The presented results are aimed both at increasing the efficiency of therapy for patients with general medical level of health care, and at increasing the safety of treatment of psychiatric patients with concomitant somatic disorders.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk and Outcome

Background and Purpose- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have a well-established association with bleeding complications and conflicting reports on outcome after stroke. We sought to evaluate whether pre-intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) SSRI use increased ICH risk and post-ICH SSRI use improved ICH outcome. Methods- Through post hoc analysis of the ERICH study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage), SSRI use was categorized into no use, pre-ICH only, pre- and post-ICH use (termed "continuous"), and post-ICH only (termed "new"). Using multivariable modeling, associations were sought between pre-ICH SSRI use and ICH risk in the case-control set, and associations between post-ICH SSRI use and 3-month outcome were analyzed in the ICH case set. Exploratory analyses sought to assess influence of race/ethnicity in models. Results- The final study cohort consisted of 2287 ICH cases and 2895 controls. Pre-ICH SSRI use was not associated with ICH risk (odds ratio, 0.824 [95% CI, 0.632-1.074]) nor potentiation of ICH risk with anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. New post-ICH SSRI use was associated with unfavorable modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months after ICH (odds ratio, 1.673 [95% CI, 1.162-2.408]; P=0.006) in multivariable analyses. Additional propensity score analysis indicated a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.107). When stratified by race/ethnicity, multivariable modeling demonstrated reduced ICH risk with pre-ICH SSRI use in Hispanics (odds ratio, 0.513 [95% CI, 0.301-0.875]; P=0.014), but not non-Hispanic whites or blacks, and no associations between post-ICH SSRI use and 3-month outcome in any racial/ethnic group. Conclusions- In a large multiethnic cohort, pre-ICH SSRI use was not associated with increased ICH risk, but post-ICH SSRI use was associated with unfavorable 3-month neurological outcome after ICH. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01202864.

Antidepressant drug use and subdural hematoma risk

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) use may be associated with development of subdural hematoma (SDH).

OBJECTIVES

To estimate SDH risk associated with antidepressant use, including when combined with antithrombotics, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed this case-control study based on Danish registries. We included 10 885 incident cases of SDH and 435 379 matched general population controls. We calculated odds ratios (95% confidence interval) adjusted for comorbidity, co-medication, education level, and income (aOR).

RESULTS

We found that current use of SSRIs (aOR1.32 [1.25-1.38]) and non-SSRIs (aOR 1.19 [1.13-1.26]) was associated with a higher SDH risk, compared with non-use of antidepressants. Risks were higher with short duration of current use (eg, <1 month of current use: aOR 2.55 [2.07-3.15] for SSRI, 1.88 [1.46-2.41] for non-SSRIs; >3 years of current use: 1.04 [0.93-1.17] for SSRI and 1.12 [0.98-1.28] for non-SSRIs). Combined use of antidepressants with either antithrombotics or NSAIDs yielded similar ORs to those observed for single use of antithrombotics or NSAIDs. Stronger associations were observed for antidepressants combined with both vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and NSAIDs (SSRI, VKA, & NSAID: aOR 5.51 [2.70-11-22]; non-SSRI, VKA, & NSAID: 6.81 [2.37-19-60]).

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant use was associated with higher risk of SDH that seemed largely restricted to first year of treatment. In absolute terms this risk is judged to be small, given the low SDH incidence rate. With one possible exception (triple use of antidepressants, NSAIDs, and VKAs), risk estimates of SDH for combined regimens of antidepressants with antithrombotics or NSAIDs provided little evidence of interactions.

Association Between Cerebral Small Vessel Disease With Antidepressant Use and Depression: 3C Dijon Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Background and Purpose- Evidence links antidepressant use with cerebral small vessel disease; however, it remains unclear whether people with depression face comparable risk. This study aims to determine the association between antidepressant drug use and depression with markers of cerebral small vessel disease. Methods- One thousand nine hundred five participants (mean age, 72.5 years; 60% women) without stroke or dementia history underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, and 1402 individuals underwent a second magnetic resonance imaging at 4 years. Outcomes were lacunes 3 to 15 mm and white matter hyperintensity volume (cm³) at baseline and follow-up. Exposure to antidepressants was grouped as (1) selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n=68), (2) tricyclics (n=40), (3) atypicals (n=24), (4) depressed nonusers (n=303), and (5) nondepressed/nonuser group (reference group, n=1470). Statistical analyses adjusted for propensity scores due to the nonrandomized exposure to antidepressant drugs. Results- There was an association between use of atypical antidepressants with lacunes at baseline (adjusted rate ratio, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.14-5.88]; P=0.023) and follow-up (adjusted rate ratio, 3.05 [95% CI, 1.25-7.43]; P=0.014). Lacunes at baseline were also associated with depressed nonusers (adjusted rate ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.06-2.21]; P=0.023). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users and depressed nonusers displayed higher total, periventricular, and deep white matter hyperintensity volumes at baseline. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users had higher deep white matter hyperintensity volumes at follow-up. Conclusions- Users of atypical antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and depressed people without any antidepressant exposure all displayed markers of cerebral small vessel disease higher than the nondepressed/nonuser group. The findings suggest that cerebral small vessel disease is associated with depression and exposure to antidepressants.

Treatment Approaches to Lacunar Stroke

Lacunar strokes are appropriately named for their ability to cavitate and form ponds or "little lakes" (Latin: lacune -ae meaning pond or pit is a diminutive form of lacus meaning lake). They account for a substantial proportion of both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic strokes. In recent years, there have been several advances in the management of large vessel occlusions. New therapies such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and left atrial appendage closure have recently been developed to improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; however, the treatment of small vessel disease-related strokes lags frustratingly behind. Since Fisher characterized the lacunar syndromes and associated infarcts in the late 1960s, there have been no therapies specifically targeting lacunar stroke. Unfortunately, many therapeutic agents used for the treatment of ischemic stroke in general offer only a modest benefit in reducing recurrent stroke while adding to the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and systemic bleeding. Escalation of antithrombotic treatments beyond standard single antiplatelet agents has not been effective in long-term lacunar stroke prevention efforts, unequivocally increasing intracerebral hemorrhage risk without providing a significant benefit. In this review, we critically review the available treatments for lacunar stroke based on evidence from clinical trials. For several of the major drugs, we summarize the adverse effects in the context of this unique patient population. We also discuss the role of neuroprotective therapies and neural repair strategies as they may relate to recovery from lacunar stroke.

The impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the risk of intracranial haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Observational studies have suggested increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICrH) in patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). We sought to clarify the impact of SSRIs on ICrH, accounting for study methodology.

Patients and methods

A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 1960 to December 2017 identified studies comparing SSRIs with control. The outcomes (first-ever and recurrent ICrH) were meta-analysed using a random effects model.

Results

Twenty-four observational studies and three randomised trials were available for meta-analysis, totalling 4,844,090 patient-years of follow-up. Those receiving SSRIs were more likely to be female (p = 0.01) and have depression (p < 0.001). Compared to controls, SSRI users had a significantly increased risk of ICrH (relative risk (RR) 1.26, 95%CI 1.11-1.42). Although SSRI use was associated with increased ICrH risk in those without previous ICrH (RR 1.31, 95%CI 1.15-1.48), this was not the case in those with previous ICrH (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.83-1.09). Sensitivity analysis according to the bleeding definition reported demonstrated that although 'haemorrhagic stroke' was associated with SSRIs (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.72), intracerebral haemorrhage was not (RR 1.11, 95%CI 0.86-1.42). Additional sensitivity analyses demonstrated a stronger association between SSRIs and ICrH in studies with a high (p < 0.001) compared to low risk of bias (p = 0.09) and with retrospective (p < 0.001) compared to prospective (p=0.31) study designs.

Discussion

Although SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of ICrH, the association is partly accounted for by important biases and other methodological limitations in the available observational data.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest there is insufficient high-quality data to advise restriction of SSRIs because of concern regarding ICrH risk.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis From the ROCKET AF Trial

Background There is concern that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI s) substantially increase bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants. Methods and Results We studied 737 patients taking SSRI s in the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Embolism and Stroke Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. These patients were propensity score matched 1:1 to 737 patients not taking SSRI s. The primary outcome measure was major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding events, the principal safety outcome in ROCKET AF . Over a mean 1.6 years of follow-up, the rate of major/ nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was 18.57 events/100 patient-years for SSRI users versus 16.84 events/100 patient-years for matched comparators, adjusted hazard ratio ( aHR ) of 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.43). The aHR s were similar in patients taking rivaroxaban ( aHR 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.51]) and those taking warfarin ( aHR 1.21 [95% CI, 0.91-1.60]). For the rarer outcome of major bleeding, the aHR for SSRI users versus those not taking SSRI s was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.62-2.06) for rivaroxaban; for warfarin, the aHR was higher, at 1.58 (95% CI , 0.96-2.60) but not statistically significantly elevated. Conclusions We found no significant increase in bleeding risk when SSRI s were combined with anticoagulant therapy, although there was a suggestion of increased bleeding risk with SSRI s added to warfarin. While physicians should be vigilant regarding bleeding risk, our results provide reassurance that SSRI s can be safely added to anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation . Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00403767.

Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Associated with the Use of Antidepressants Inhibiting Serotonin Reuptake: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have suggested an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other antidepressants primarily inhibiting serotonin reuptake.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to systematically review the available epidemiologic evidence regarding the risk of ICH associated with SSRIs and antidepressants inhibiting serotonin reuptake.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for all relevant articles in English, French, or German published before April 2017. Observational studies with SSRIs or any antidepressants classified by strength of serotonin reuptake inhibition as primary exposure, a comparison group, and ICH as outcome were eligible.

RESULTS

Among twelve identified studies (six nested case-control, three cohort, two case-control, one case-crossover), seven assessed the risk of ICH associated with SSRIs (some also including other antidepressants primarily inhibiting serotonin reuptake), two the risk of ICH associated with inhibitors of serotonin reuptake according to the degree of reuptake inhibition, and three addressed both objectives. Four of ten studies showed an increased risk of ICH associated with SSRIs, with the two largest studies suggesting a moderate effect. Three of five studies showed an increased risk of ICH associated with strong inhibitors of serotonin reuptake. Limitations including residual confounding, inclusion of prevalent users, potentially inappropriate study designs, and lack of power may have influenced these results, especially in studies showing no association or a highly increased risk.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggests an increased risk of ICH with antidepressants primarily inhibiting serotonin reuptake, such as SSRIs. An increased risk of ICH with strong inhibitors of serotonin reuptake compared with weak inhibitors is also possible but the available evidence is limited. Antidepressants only moderately or weakly inhibiting serotonin reuptake might be preferred in high-risk patients.

Risk of Stroke Among Older Medicare Antidepressant Users With Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of stroke associated with new antidepressant use among older adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 64 214 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older meeting inclusion criteria and hospitalized with a TBI during 2006 to 2010.

DESIGN

New user design. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of stroke.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary exposure was new antidepressant use following TBI identified through Medicare part D claims. The primary outcome was stroke following TBI. Ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 20 859 (32%) beneficiaries used an antidepressant at least once following TBI. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors accounted for the majority of antidepressant use. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.50) but not ischemic stroke (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.15). The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors escitalopram (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74) and sertraline (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.10-1.94) were associated with an increase in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study will aid prescribers in choosing appropriate antidepressants to treat depression in older adults with TBI.

Strategies for dementia prevention: latest evidence and implications

Dementia is a common and debilitating syndrome with enormous impact on individuals and societies. Preventing disease onset or progression would translate to public health and societal benefits. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence on interventions that may show promise for the prevention of cognitive decline. We appraise existing evidence primarily drawn from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, but also highlight observational studies in humans and relevant work in model organisms. Overall, there is currently limited evidence to support a cause-effect relationship between any preventive strategy and the development or progression of dementia. However, studies to date suggest that a multifactorial intervention comprising regular exercise and healthy diet, along with the amelioration of vascular risk factors, psychosocial stress, and major depressive episodes may be most promising for the prevention of cognitive decline. We discuss the challenges, future directions, and implications of this line of research.

Preadmission use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and short-term mortality in diabetic patients hospitalized due to stroke

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of stroke with a poor prognosis. Moreover, diabetic patients are at increased risk of depression and therefore likely to use selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). We examined whether preadmission SSRI use was associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients hospitalized due to stroke.

METHODS

Population-based medical databases were used to identify all first-time stroke-related hospitalizations and subsequent mortality in diabetic patients in Denmark between 2004 and 2012 (n = 12 620). Based on redeemed prescriptions, SSRI use was categorized as current (new or long term), former or nonuse, and absolute 30-day mortality and mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were computed using Cox regression controlling for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Amongst SSRI nonusers, 30-day stroke mortality was 15.8% (10.4% for ischaemic stroke, 41.8% for intracerebral haemorrhage and 27.3% for subarachnoid haemorrhage). Amongst current SSRI users, 30-day stroke mortality was 23.3% (17.1% for ischaemic stroke, 50.7% for intracerebral haemorrhage and 28.6% for subarachnoid haemorrhage). Current SSRI use was associated with increased 30-day stroke mortality compared with nonuse [adjusted MRR 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.5], with the highest risk observed amongst new users (MRR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8). Overall stroke mortality was driven by increased mortality due to ischaemic stroke, with adjusted MRRs of 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.7) for current users and 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.4) for new users. Propensity score-matched results were similar and robust across subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with diabetes, preadmission SSRI use was associated with increased mortality following ischaemic stroke, compared with nonuse.

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risks of Stroke in Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Population-Based Study

Background

Previous research has suggested a link between antidepressants use and the development of cerebrovascular events, but there has never been any study investigating the risk of stroke in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Database of Taiwan between the year of 2001 and 2009. A total of 527 OCD patients with 412 subjects in the SSRI use group and 115 in the non SSRI use group were included. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to explore the associations between SSRI use and the occurrence of stroke, controlling for age, gender, concomitant medications, and comorbid medical illnesses.

Results

A total of nineteen OCD patients were diagnosed with new onset of stroke during the follow-up period including six cases in the SSRI group and thirteen in the non SSRI use group. SSRI use was demonstrated to be associated with a decreased risk of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10–0.86, P = 0.02). The increase in age-related risk of strokes was 2.55 per decade (HR = 2.55; 95% CI = 1.74–3.75, P<0.001). Alternatively, sex, concomitant use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and comorbidities with angina pectoris, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were not found to be associated with an increased risk for stroke in OCD patients.

Conclusions

Our study showed that SSRI use was associated with decreased risk of stroke in OCD patients. Further investigation into the possible biological mechanisms underlying the relationship between stroke and SSRI use in OCD patients is warranted.

Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Abnormal Bleeding

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) increase the risk of abnormal bleeding by lowering platelet serotonin and hence the efficiency of platelet-driven hemostasis; by increasing gastric acidity and possibly gastric ulceration; and by other mechanisms. The upper gastrointestinal tract is the commonest site of SRI-related abnormal bleeding; bleeding at this location may be increased by concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and by treatment with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. Bleeding at this location may be reduced by concurrent administration of acid-suppressing drugs.

Bleeding risk under selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been reported to be potentially associated with an increased risk of bleeding. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted to quantify this risk. Case-control and cohort studies investigating bleeding risk under SSRI therapy were retrieved by searching the Medline, Pascal, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Case-control studies were included if they reported bleeding incidents with and without the use of SSRIs and cohort studies were included if they reported the rate of bleeds among SSRI users and non-users. The main outcome was severe bleeding, whatever the site. Only data concerning SSRI belonging to the ATC class N06AB were used. For both case-control and cohort studies, we recorded the adjusted effect estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates were computed for case-control and cohort studies using an inverse-variance model. Meta-analysis of the adjusted ORs of 42 observational studies showed a significant association between SSRI use and the risk of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.27-1.57), random effect model, p<0.0001]. The association was found for the 31 case-control studies (1,255,073 patients), with an increased risk of 41% of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.25-1.60)], as well as for the 11 cohort studies including 187,956 patients [OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.64)]. Subgroup analyses showed that the association remained constant whatever the characteristics of studies. This meta-analysis shows an increased risk of bleeding of at least 36% (from 12% to 64%) based on the high-level of observational studies with SSRIs use.

Risk of intracranial haemorrhage in antidepressant users with concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nationwide propensity score matched study

OBJECTIVE

To define the risk of intracranial haemorrhage among patients treated with antidepressants and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), compared with the risk among those treated with antidepressants without NSAIDs.

DESIGN

Retrospective nationwide propensity score matched cohort study.

SETTING

Korean nationwide health insurance database between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who began receiving antidepressants for the first time (index date) without a history of having received a prescription for antidepressants during the preceding year. Patients who had been diagnosed as having cerebrovascular diseases within a year before the index date were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Time to first hospital admission with intracranial haemorrhage within 30 days after drug use. Matched Cox regression models were used to compare the risk of intracranial haemorrhage among patients who were treated with antidepressants with and without NSAIDs, after propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio.

RESULTS

After propensity score estimation and matching in a 1:1 ratio, the cohort used in the analysis included 4,145,226 people. The 30 day risk of intracranial haemorrhage during the entire study period was higher for combined use of antidepressants and NSAIDs than for use of antidepressants without NSAIDs (hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 1.85). No statistically meaningful differences were found in risk of intracranial haemorrhage between the antidepressant drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of antidepressants and NSAIDs was associated with an increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage within 30 days of initial combination.

Using antidepressants and the risk of stroke recurrence: report from a national representative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the association between antidepressants and the risk of stroke recurrence was scanty. This study evaluated the risk of stroke recurrence according to using antidepressants in patients with stroke from a national representative cohort.

METHODS

This cohort study followed 16770 patients aged > =20 years who had an incident stroke from 2000 to 2009 from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Records of each antidepressant prescription were obtained during follow-up. The types of antidepressants were categorized by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system: tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and other antidepressants. The main outcome was a recurrent stroke during the follow-up period. The time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model was used in the analyses.

RESULTS

During 63715 person-years of follow-up, we documented 3769 events for stroke recurrence. Antidepressants use was associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95 % confidence interval [C.I.], 1.24-1.62), especially for ischemic stroke (HR, 1.48; 95 % C.I., 1.28-1.70), but not for hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 1.22; 95 % C.I., 0.86-1.73). The increased risk of stoke recurrence was found for TCAs use only (HR, 1.41; 95 % C.I., 1.14-1.74), SSRIs use only (HR, 1.31; 95 % C.I.,1.00-1.73),use of other types of antidepressants only(HR, 1.46; 95 % C.I.,1.15-1.84), or use of multiple types of antidepressants (HR, 1.84; 95 % C.I.,1.04-3.25).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that use of antidepressants was associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence, especially in ischemic stroke among Taiwanese. Further studies are warranted to confirm the possible underlying mechanisms of these findings.

Risk-benefit analysis of antidepressant drug treatment in the elderly

Depression in the elderly is a significant health issue that has the potential to seriously affect physical and emotional well-being. Therefore, the treatment of geriatric depression is necessary. Antidepressant treatment in older depressed patients is efficacious, but differences in the effectiveness of different classes of antidepressants have not been demonstrated. However, differences in tolerability profile are most recognizable in the elderly. With ageing, a series of changes occur in the elderly that modify both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antidepressants and may influence the efficacy, tolerability and safety of treatment in the elderly. Comorbidities require the use of other drugs, which increases the possibility of drug-drug interactions. Given these aspects, individualized therapy for each elderly patient is needed to achieve acceptable risk-benefit ratio. Effective treatment of depression in the elderly, which may require combined pharmacological with psychosocial treatment, can decrease both morbidity and mortality; it also may lead to reduced demands on family members and on health-care and social services.

Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications have been linked to increased bleeding risk; however, the actual association among warfarin, SSRI exposure, and bleeding risk has not been well-established. We studied the AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation cohort of 13,559 adults with atrial fibrillation, restricted to the 9,186 patients contributing follow-up time while taking warfarin. Exposure to SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) was assessed from pharmacy database dispensing data. The main outcome was hospitalization for major hemorrhage. Results were adjusted for bleeding risk and time in international normalized ratio range >3. We identified 461 major hemorrhages during 32,888 person-years of follow-up, 45 events during SSRI use, 12 during TCA-only use, and 404 without either medication. Hemorrhage rates were higher during periods of SSRI exposure compared with periods on no antidepressants (2.32 per 100 person-years vs 1.35 per 100 person-years, p <0.001) and did not differ between TCA exposure and no antidepressants (1.30 per 100 person-years on TCAs, p = 0.94). After adjustment for underlying bleeding risk and time in international normalized ratio range >3, SSRI exposure was associated with an increased rate of hemorrhage compared with no antidepressants (adjusted relative risk 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.92, p = 0.03), whereas TCA exposure was not (adjusted relative risk 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.46, p = 0.50). In conclusion, SSRI exposure was associated with higher major hemorrhage risk in patients taking warfarin, and this risk should be considered when selecting antidepressant treatments in those patients.

Association between warfarin combined with serotonin-modulating antidepressants and increased case fatality in primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a population-based study

Object

Patients receiving oral anticoagulants run a higher risk of cerebral hemorrhage with a poor outcome. Serotonin-modulating antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]) are frequently used in combination with warfarin, but it is unclear whether this combination of drugs influences outcome after primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH). The authors investigated case fatality in PICH among patients from a defined population who were receiving warfarin alone, with aspirin, or with serotonin-modulating antidepressants.

Methods

Nine hundred eighty-two subjects with PICH were derived from the population of Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland, for the years 1993–2008, and those with warfarin-associated PICH were eligible for analysis. Their hospital records were reviewed, and medication data were obtained from the national register of prescribed medicines. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn to illustrate cumulative case fatality, and a Cox proportional-hazards analysis was performed to demonstrate predictors of death.

Results

Of the 176 patients eligible for analysis, 17 had been taking aspirin and 19 had been taking SSRI/SNRI together with warfarin. The 30-day case fatality rates were 50.7%, 58.8%, and 78.9%, respectively, for those taking warfarin alone, with aspirin, or with SSRI/SNRI (p = 0.033, warfarin plus SSRI/SNRI compared with warfarin alone). Warfarin combined with SSRI/SNRI was a significant independent predictor of case fatality (adjusted HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.13–3.92, p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Concurrent use of warfarin and a serotonin-modulating antidepressant, relative to warfarin alone, seemed to increase the case fatality rate for PICH. This finding should be taken into account if hematoma evacuation is planned.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants on cerebrovascular events: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Depression is a common disorder worldwide and is strongly associated with stroke. Use of antidepressants could potentially decrease the risk of stroke in patients with depression. However, the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most frequently prescribed antidepressant in this era, in the risk of stroke showed inconsistent results. We aimed to assess the association between the use of different types of antidepressants, SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and the risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with depression or anxiety. A nationwide population-based cohort study was retrospectively conducted in patients with depression or anxiety who started to take SSRIs and TCAs identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database (2001-2009). We examined the association between the 2 types of antidepressants and incidence of stroke using a proportional hazard model adjusted for stroke risk factors. Among the 24,662 SSRI and 14,736 TCA initiators, the crude incidence rate for stroke was 10.03 and 13.77 per 100 person-years, respectively. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use was not associated with risk of stroke as compared with TCAs in the time-fixed analysis. After adjusting for baseline propensity scores in the time-varying analysis, SSRI use significantly reduced risk of stroke as compared with TCAs with the adjusted hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.96). The effect persisted even after considering the antidepressant dosage (hazard ratio, 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]). In summary, use of SSRIs was associated with a reduced risk for stroke, as compared with TCAs, in this specific disease population.

Does preexisting antiplatelet treatment influence postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage in community-treated ischemic stroke patients? An observational study

OBJECTIVES

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after acute stroke thrombolysis is associated with poor outcomes. Previous investigations of the relationship between preexisting antiplatelet use and the safety of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis have been limited by low event rates. The objective of this study was to determine whether preexisting antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of ICH following acute stroke thrombolysis. The primary hypothesis was that antiplatelet use would not be associated with radiographic evidence of ICH after controlling for relevant confounders.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of thrombolysis patients treated in the emergency department (ED) were identified using multiple methods. Retrospective data were collected from four hospitals from 1996 to 2004 and 24 other hospitals from 2007 to 2010 as part of a cluster-randomized trial. The same chart abstraction tool was used during both time periods, and data were subjected to numerous quality control checks. Hemorrhages were classified using a prespecified methodology: ICH was defined as presence of hemorrhage in radiographic interpretations of follow-up imaging (primary outcome). Symptomatic ICH (sICH) was defined as radiographic ICH with associated clinical worsening. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to adjust for clinical factors previously identified to be related to postthrombolysis ICH. Sensitivity analyses were conducted where the unadjusted and adjusted results from this study were combined with those of previously published external studies on this topic via meta-analytic techniques.

RESULTS

There were 830 patients included, with 47% having documented preexisting antiplatelet treatment. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 69 (± 15) years, and the cohort was 53% male. The unadjusted proportion of patients with any ICH was 15.1% without antiplatelet use and 19.3% with antiplatelet use (absolute risk difference = 4.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.2% to 9.6%); for sICH this was 6.1% without antiplatelet use and 9% with antiplatelet use (absolute risk difference = 3.1%, 95% CI = -1% to 6.7%). After adjusting for confounders, antiplatelet use was not significantly associated with radiographic ICH (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.7) or sICH (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.7 to 2.2). In patients 81 years and older, there was a higher risk of radiographic ICH (absolute risk difference = 11.9%, 95% CI = 0.1% to 23.6%). The meta-analyses combined the findings of this investigation with previous similar work and found increased unadjusted risks of radiographic ICH (absolute risk difference = 4.9%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 9%) and sICH (absolute risk difference = 4%, 95% CI = 2.3% to 5.6%). The meta-analytic adjusted OR of sICH for antiplatelet use was 1.6 (95% CI = 1.1 to 2.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors did not find that preexisting antiplatelet use was associated with postthrombolysis ICH or sICH in this cohort of community treated patients. Preexisting tobacco use, younger age, and lower severity were associated with lower odds of sICH. The meta-analyses demonstrated small, but statistically significant increases in the absolute risk of radiographic ICH and sICH, along with increased odds of sICH in patients with preexisting antiplatelet use.

Predictors for recurrent primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective population-based study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Underlying comorbidities, previous strokes, and medication may increase the risk for primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH) and its recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine the independent predictors for recurrent PICH.

METHODS

We identified 961 subjects with first-ever PICH from 1993 to 2008 among the population of Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland. Hospital and death records were reviewed and data on drug use were obtained from the national register of prescribed medicines. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to demonstrate predictors for recurrence of PICH.

RESULTS

Total follow-up time of the 961 patients was 3481 person-years. During the follow-up time, 58 subjects had altogether 68 recurrent PICHs. The annual average incidence of first recurrence was 1.67%. Cumulative 5- and 10-year incidence rates were 9.6% and 14.2%, respectively. In univariable analysis, history of ischemic stroke, diabetes mellitus, and aspirin use were associated with a higher recurrence rate. In multivariable analysis, only previous ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.05; P=0.009) independently predicted PICH recurrence. Diabetes mellitus tended to increase (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-5.80; P=0.056), whereas treated hypertension tended to decrease (0.45, 0.20-1.01; P=0.054) the risk for fatal recurrent PICH.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous ischemic stroke independent of confounding factors may increase the risk for PICH recurrence.

Incident user cohort study of risk for gastrointestinal bleed and stroke in individuals with major depressive disorder treated with antidepressants

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between exposure to newer antidepressants and risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and other bleeding complications among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD).

DESIGN

This study uses an incident user cohort design to compare associations between incidence of vascular/bleeding events and the relative affinity (low, moderate or high) of the antidepressant for the serotonin transporter during an exposure risk period for each patient.

SETTING

New England healthcare system electronic medical record database.

PARTICIPANTS

36 389 individuals with a diagnosis of MDD and monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor or other new-generation antidepressant were identified from among 3.1 million patients in a New England healthcare system.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of bleeding or other vascular complications, including acute liver failure, acute renal failure, asthma, breast cancer and hip fractures.

RESULTS

601 GI bleeds were observed in the 21 462 subjects in the high-affinity group versus 333 among the 14 927 subjects in the lower affinity group (adjusted RR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34). Similarly, 776 strokes were observed in the high-affinity group versus 434 in the lower affinity treatment group (adjusted RR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.32). No significant association with risk for a priori negative control outcomes, including acute liver failure, acute renal failure, asthma, breast cancer and hip fractures, was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of antidepressants with high affinity for the serotonin transporter may confer modestly elevated risk for GI and other bleeding complications. While multiple methodologic limitations must be considered, these results suggest that antidepressants with lower serotonin receptor affinity may be preferred in patients at greater risk for such complications.

Cardiologic side effects of psychotropic drugs

Psychotropic drugs can produce cardiovascular side effects associated with a degree of cardiotoxicity. The coexistence of a heart disease complicates the management of mental illness, can contribute to a reduced quality of life and a worse illness course. The co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders in cardiac patients might affect the clinical outcome and morbidity. Moreover, the complex underlying mechanism that links these two conditions remains unclear. This paper discusses the known cardiovascular complications of psychotropic drugs and analyzes the important implications of antidepressive treatment in patients with previous cardiac history.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet function: mechanisms, clinical outcomes and implications for use in elderly patients

Among the antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often preferred to other classes of antidepressants in the treatment of depression in the elderly because of their better safety profile. Most of the known effects of SSRIs, either beneficial or adverse, are linked to their inhibitory action on the serotonin reuptake transporter (5-HTT). This reuptake mechanism is present not only in neurons but also in other cells such as platelets. Serotoninergic mechanisms seem to play an important role in haemostasis, and their importance in this regard has long been underestimated. Abnormal activation may lead to a pro-thrombotic state, as may occur in patients with major depressive disorder, whilst downregulation, as occurs in patients treated with SSRIs, may have two clinical consequences, both of particular interest in the elderly. On the one hand, there may be an increased risk of bleeding; on the other hand, a reduction in thrombotic risk may be possible. Polymorphism in the promoter region of the gene that transcribes the 5-HTT has been shown to have a relevant impact on its function and, in turn, on the beneficial and adverse effects of SSRIs. Bleeding has been a concern since the introduction of SSRIs, with multiple case reports published and communicated to the pharmacovigilance systems. The first epidemiological study was published in 1999 and since then, 34 epidemiological studies from different areas, most of them including elderly patients in their study populations, have been published with a variety of results. Broadly, the epidemiological evidence supports a moderately increased risk of bleeding associated with the use of SSRIs, which may be critically dependent on patient susceptibility and the presence of risk factors. The impairment of primary haemostasis induced by SSRIs may result, as a beneficial counterpart, in a reduction in the thrombotic risk. A small number of clinical trials and an increasing number of epidemiological studies that include elderly patients have been conducted to clarify whether SSRIs reduce the risk of primary and secondary ischaemic disorders. However, the results have been inconclusive with some studies suggesting a preventive effect and others no effect or even an increased risk. Behind such contradictory results may be the role of depression itself as a cardiovascular risk factor and, therefore, a major confounding factor. How to disentangle its effect from that of the antidepressants is the methodological challenge to be overcome in future studies. In this complex scenario, the elderly seem to be at a crossroads, because they are the group in which both the risks and the benefits can be the greatest. Studies performed to date have provided us with some clues that can help orient clinicians in taking the most appropriate course of action. For instance, as the gastrointestinal bleeding risk appears to increase with age, prudent advice in patients with a previous history of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer, and in those who take NSAIDs, oral anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs or corticosteroids, would be to suggest addition of an acid-suppressing agent to the drug regimen in those elderly patients in whom SSRIs are indicated.

Depression and incident stroke in women

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Depression has been associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, but prospective data for the association with stroke are limited.

METHODS

We followed-up 80 574 women aged 54 to 79 years in Nurses' Health Study without a history of stroke from 2000 to 2006. Depressive symptoms were assessed at multiple time points by a Mental Health Index score (1992, 1996, and 2000), and clinical significant depressive symptoms were defined as a score≤52. Antidepressant medication use was asked biennially beginning in 1996, and physician-diagnosed depression was reported biennially beginning in 2000. Depression was defined as currently reporting or having a history of any of these 3 conditions.

RESULTS

During 6 years of follow-up, 1033 incident strokes were documented (538 ischemic, 124 hemorrhagic, and 371 unknown strokes). Having a history of depression was associated with a multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.48) for total stroke. Women who used antidepressant medications were at increased risk for stroke, whether they also had a Mental Health Index score≤52 or diagnosed depression (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.69) or not (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67). Furthermore, for each cycle, participants who reported current depression had an increased risk of stroke (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.67), whereas individuals who only had a history of depression were at nonsignificantly elevated risk (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.97-1.56) compared with women who never reported a diagnosis of depression or antidepressant medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that depression is associated with a moderately increased risk of subsequent stroke.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and oral bleeding complications after invasive dental treatment

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of oral bleeding complications after invasive dental procedures in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, we included dental patients who had invasive dental treatment and were taking an SSRI medication. Data collected included demographics, medical history, dental visits and procedures, and use of adjunctive measures to control bleeding. Primary outcomes included documentation of return visits or phone calls to the dental clinic or emergency department (ED) for oral bleeding, and oral bleeding or use of blood products for inpatients.

RESULTS

There were 92 patients taking SSRIs who had 145 invasive procedure visits, consisting of extractions, implant surgery, alveoloplasty, periodontal surgery, subgingival scaling and root planning, and biopsy. There were 110 extraction visits yielding a total of 167 extractions. Among all patients, there was 1 return visit to the clinic and 1 telephone call with a chief complaint of oral bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of oral bleeding complications after invasive dental treatment is low to negligible in patients on SSRI medications.

Bleeding incidence with concomitant use of antidepressants and warfarin

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding is the major complication associated with warfarin therapy. Some antidepressants are also associated with increased bleeding risk. Warfarin and antidepressants are used frequently in combination, but it is unclear whether concomitant use increases the risk of bleeding beyond that with warfarin alone. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether the use of warfarin and an antidepressant increases the risk for bleeding outcomes compared with the use of warfarin alone. The secondary goal was to characterize the risk of bleeding in warfarin-treated patients taking one specific class of antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, study of warfarin-treated patients prescribed (n = 46) and not prescribed (n = 54) an antidepressant. Medical records over 6 months were reviewed for international normalized ratio values, medical history, bleeding type and incidence, and hospitalization due to bleeding. Patients were included in the antidepressant group if they were taking concomitant warfarin and antidepressant therapy consistently for a period of 6 months and in the control group if they were not taking an antidepressant with warfarin.

RESULTS

The use of any antidepressant with warfarin was not associated with the incidence of any bleeding or major bleeding during the 6-month period. However, the use of an SSRI with warfarin was associated with an increase in any bleeding event (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-6.4 P = 0.04). The use of an SSRI remained a significant predictor of bleeding after accounting for other factors associated with bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, it is important to clarify the interaction between warfarin and SSRIs in regard to bleeding risk given the high frequency of their concomitant use.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and gastrointestinal bleeding: a case-control study

Background

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been associated with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Given their worldwide use, even small risks account for a large number of cases. This study has been conducted with carefully collected information to further investigate the relationship between SSRIs and upper GI bleeding.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study in hospitals in Spain and in Italy. Cases were patients aged ≥18 years with a primary diagnosis of acute upper GI bleeding diagnosed by endoscopy; three controls were matched by sex, age, date of admission (within 3 months) and hospital among patients who were admitted for elective surgery for non-painful disorders. Exposures to SSRIs, other antidepressants and other drugs were defined as any use of these drugs in the 7 days before the day on which upper gastrointestinal bleeding started (index day).

Results

581 cases of upper GI bleeding and 1358 controls were considered eligible for the study; no differences in age or sex distribution were observed between cases and controls after matching. Overall, 4.0% of the cases and 3.3% of controls used an SSRI antidepressant in the week before the index day. No significant risk of upper GI bleeding was encountered for SSRI antidepressants (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.57–1.96) or for whichever other grouping of antidepressants.

Conclusions

The results of this case-control study showed no significant increase in upper GI bleeding with SSRIs and provide good evidence that the magnitude of any increase in risk is not greater than 2.

The use of antidepressants and the risk of haemorrhagic stroke: a nested case control study

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) are associated with an increased risk of bleeding disorders at a number of sites. It is currently unclear whether they increase the risk of haemorrhagic stroke, with conflicting results reported.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

We found no association between SSRI use and haemorrhagic stroke. The large number of patients involved in the study allowed us to rule out any substantial effect. The results were similar in people with and without a previous history of cerebrovascular events.

AIM

To investigate whether selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) use is associated with an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke in a cohort of antidepressant users.

METHODS

We conducted a case control study, nested within a cohort of antidepressant users in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. A cohort of 365,195 patients prescribed either an SSRI or tricyclic antidepressant between 1992 and 2006 was identified. Three hundred and fifty-seven cases of haemorrhagic stroke were observed and 1631 control patients without haemorrhagic stroke were selected.

RESULTS

The primary analysis showed no evidence of an association between current SSRI or TCA use and haemorrhagic stroke. Current use of an SSRI compared with no use at the time of haemorrhagic stroke was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.11 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82, 1.50). For current tricyclic use the equivalent odds ratio was 0.73 (0.52, 1.02). There was no evidence that prior cerebrovascular events modified the effect of either SSRIs or TCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke, regardless of prior history of cerebrovascular events.