Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Recurrent Vascular Events After First Ischemic Stroke

Consensus on lipoprotein(a) of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis. Literature review and recommendations for clinical practice

The irruption of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the study of cardiovascular risk factors is perhaps, together with the discovery and use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (iPCSK9) inhibitor drugs, the greatest novelty in the field for decades. Lp(a) concentration (especially very high levels) has an undeniable association with certain cardiovascular complications, such as atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) and aortic stenosis. However, there are several current limitations to both establishing epidemiological associations and specific pharmacological treatment. Firstly, the measurement of Lp(a) is highly dependent on the test used, mainly because of the characteristics of the molecule. Secondly, Lp(a) concentration is more than 80% genetically determined, so that, unlike other cardiovascular risk factors, it cannot be regulated by lifestyle changes. Finally, although there are many promising clinical trials with specific drugs to reduce Lp(a), currently only iPCSK9 (limited for use because of its cost) significantly reduces Lp(a). However, and in line with other scientific societies, the SEA considers that, with the aim of increasing knowledge about the contribution of Lp(a) to cardiovascular risk, it is relevant to produce a document containing the current status of the subject, recommendations for the control of global cardiovascular risk in people with elevated Lp(a) and recommendations on the therapeutic approach to patients with elevated Lp(a).

Lipoprotein a - Lp(a)

Lp(a) is a genetically determined, heritable, independent and causal risk factor for ASCVD. About 1 in 5 people worldwide have elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL or >125 nmol/L) whereas in Indians it is 25 %. Epidemiological, genome-wide association and mendelian randomization studies have demonstrated an association between elevated Lp(a) levels and increased incidence of myocardial infarction, aortic valve stenosis, ischemic stroke, heart failure, CV and all-cause mortality. The increased Lp(a)-mediated CV risk is mediated by pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic and pro-atherogenic processes, leading to progression of atherosclerosis and increased risk of thrombosis. Lp(a) level reaches peak by 5 years of age and remains stable over time. Levels are not much influenced by dietary and environmental factors but it can vary in certain clinical situations like thyroid diseases, chronic kidney disease, inflammation and sepsis. It should be measured at least once in life time. Cascade testing for high Lp(a) is recommended in the settings of FH, family history of (very) high Lp(a), and personal or family history of ASCVD. In the absence of specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, comprehensive risk factor management is recommended as per guidelines for individuals with elevated Lp(a). PCSK9 inhibitors and Inclisiran reduce Lp(a) by 25%. Pelacarsen is an antisense oligonucleotide and is found to reduce Lp(a) by 80%. In a recent Indian study of 1,021 CAD patients, presence of elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) correlated with severe angiographic disease. 37% of ACS patients exhibited elevated Lp(a) and it was higher in young CAD patients with FH (43%).

Lipoprotein(a) predicts recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with prior cardiovascular events post-PCI: five-year findings from a large single center cohort study

Background

It is well established that lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] play a vital role in atherosclerosis. Whether Lp(a) can predict recurrence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in prior CVEs patients is still unclear. We aim to investigate its association with subsequent long-term adverse events in this high-risk population.

Methods

A total of 4,469 patients with prior CVEs history after PCI were consecutively enrolled and categorized according Lp(a) values of < 10 (low), 10 to 30 (medium), and ≥ 30 mg/dL (high). The primary endpoint was MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and unplanned revascularization.

Results

During an average of 5.0 years of follow-up, 1,078 (24.1%) and 206 (4.6%) patients experienced MACCE and all-cause death with 134 (3.0%) of whom from cardiac death. The incidence of MACCE, all-cause death and cardiac death were significantly higher in the high Lp(a) group (p < 0.05). After adjustment of confounding factors, high Lp(a) level remained an independent risk factor for MACCE (adjusted HR 1.240, 95%CI 1.065–1.443, p = 0.006), all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.445, 95%CI 1.023–2.042, p = 0.037) and cardiac death (adjusted HR 1.724, 95%CI 1.108–2.681, p = 0.016). This correlation remained significant when treated as a natural logarithm-transformed continuous variable. This finding is relatively consistent across subgroups and confirmed again in two sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Our present study confirmed that Lp(a) was an independent predictor for recurrent CVEs in patients with established CVEs, illustrating that Lp(a) level might be a valuable biomarker for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in this high-risk population.

Lipoprotein(a) and residual vascular risk in statin-treated patients with first acute ischemic stroke: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Statins either barely affect or increase lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. This study aimed to explore the factors correlated to the change of Lp(a) levels as well as the relationship between Lp(a) and the recurrent vascular events in statin-treated patients with first acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

Patients who were admitted to the hospital with first AIS from October 2018 to September 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Correlation between the change of Lp(a) levels and potential influencing factors was assessed by linear regression analysis. Cox proportional regression models were used to estimate the association between Lp(a) and recurrent vascular events including AIS, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

In total, 303 patients, 69.6% males with mean age 64.26 ± 11.38 years, completed the follow-up. During the follow-up period, Lp(a) levels increased in 50.5% of statin-treated patients and the mean percent change of Lp(a) levels were 14.48% (95% CI 6.35-22.61%). Creatinine (β = 0.152, 95% CI 0.125-0.791, P = 0.007) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (β = 0.160, 95% CI 0.175-0.949, P = 0.005) were positively associated with the percent change of Lp(a) levels. During a median follow-up of 26 months, 66 (21.8%) patients had a recurrent vascular event. The median time period between AIS onset and vascular events recurrence was 9.5 months (IQR 2.0-16.3 months). The on-statin Lp(a) level ≥70 mg/dL (HR 2.539, 95% CI 1.076-5.990, P = 0.033) and the change of Lp(a) levels (HR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.005, P = 0.033) were associated with the recurrent vascular events in statin-treated patients with first AIS. Furthermore, the on-statin Lp(a) levels ≥70 mg/dL (HR 3.612, 95% CI 1.018-12.815, P = 0.047) increased the risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels < 1.8 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) levels increased in half of statin-treated patients with first AIS. Creatinine and AST were positively associated with the percent change of Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) is a determinant of residual vascular risk and the change of Lp(a) is positively associated with the risk of recurrent vascular events in these patients.

Management of Dyslipidaemia for the Prevention of Stroke: Clinical Practice Recommendations from the Lipid Association of India

Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide. The rates of stroke are increasing in less affluent countries predominantly because of a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors. The Lipid Association of India (LAI) has provided a risk stratification algorithm for patients with ischaemic stroke and recommended low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for those in a very high risk group and extreme risk group (category A) of <50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) while the LDL-C goal for extreme risk group (category B) is ≤30 mg/dl (0.8 mmol/l). High intensity statins are the first-line lipid lowering therapy. Non-statin therapy like ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors may be added as an adjunct to statins in patients who do not achieve LDL-C goals statins alone. In acute ischaemic stroke, high intensity statin therapy improves neurological and functional outcomes regardless of thrombolytic therapy. Although conflicting data exist regarding increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) with statin use, the overall benefit risk ratio favors long-term statin therapy necessitating detailed discussion with the patient. Patients who have statins withdrawn while being on prior statin therapy at the time of acute ischaemic stroke have worse functional outcomes and increased mortality. LAI recommends that statins be continued in such patients. In patients presenting with ICH, statins should not be started in the acute phase but should be continued in patients who are already taking statins. ICH patients, once stable, need risk stratification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

The Role of Biomarkers in Atherothrombotic Stroke-A Systematic Review

Stroke represents the primary debilitating disease in adults and is the second-highest cause of death worldwide. Atherosclerosis, the most prevalent etiology for vascular conditions, is a continuous process that gradually creates and develops endothelial lesions known as atherosclerotic plaques. These lesions lead to the appearance of atherothrombotic stroke. In the last decades, the role of biological biomarkers has emerged as either diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic targets. This article aims to create a list of potential biomarkers related to atherothrombotic stroke by reviewing the currently available literature. We identified 23 biomarkers and assessed their roles as risk factors, detection markers, prognostic predictors, and therapeutic targets. The central aspect of these biomarkers is related to risk stratification, especially for patients who have not yet suffered a stroke. Other valuable data are focused on the predictive capabilities for stroke patients regarding short-term and long-term prognosis, including their influence over the acute phase treatment, such as rt-PA thrombolysis. Although the role of biomarkers is anticipated to be of extreme value in the future, they cannot yet compete with traditional stroke neuroimaging markers but could be used as additional tools for etiological diagnosis.

Lipoprotein(a) is associated with large artery atherosclerosis stroke aetiology and stroke recurrence among patients below the age of 60 years: results from the BIOSIGNAL study

AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a recognized causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but its role for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the association of Lp(a) with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke and risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events in AIS patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For this analysis of the prospective, observational, multicentre BIOSIGNAL cohort study we measured Lp(a) levels in plasma samples of 1733 primarily Caucasian (98.6%) AIS patients, collected within 24 h after symptom onset. Primary outcomes were LAA stroke aetiology and recurrent cerebrovascular events (ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack) within 1 year. We showed that Lp(a) levels are independently associated with LAA stroke aetiology [adjusted odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.90, per unit log10Lp(a) increase] and identified age as a potent effect modifier (Pinteraction =0.031) of this association. The adjusted odds ratio for LAA stroke in patients aged <60 years was 3.64 (95% CI 1.76-7.52) per unit log10Lp(a) increase and 4.04 (95% CI 1.73-9.43) using the established cut-off ≥100 nmol/l. For 152 recurrent cerebrovascular events, we did not find a significant association in the whole cohort. However, Lp(a) levels ≥100 nmol/l were associated with an increased risk for recurrent events among patients who were either <60 years [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.40, 95% CI 1.05-5.47], had evident LAA stroke aetiology (adjusted HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.08-4.40), or had no known atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.03-2.48).

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with LAA stroke aetiology and risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events among primarily Caucasian individuals aged <60 years or with evident arteriosclerotic disease.

Lipoprotein(a) levels and atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in the carotid artery: The Plaque at RISK (PARISK) study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and recurrent ischemic stroke. Lipoprotein(a) levels are known to be associated with carotid artery stenosis, but the relation of lipoprotein(a) levels to carotid atherosclerotic plaque composition and morphology is less known. We hypothesize that higher lipoprotein(a) levels and lipoprotein(a)-related SNPs are associated with a more vulnerable carotid plaque and that this effect is sex-specific.

METHODS

In 182 patients of the Plaque At RISK study we determined lipoprotein(a) concentrations, apo(a) KIV-2 repeats and LPA SNPs. Imaging characteristics of carotid atherosclerosis were determined by MDCTA (n = 161) and/or MRI (n = 171). Regressions analyses were used to investigate sex-stratified associations between lipoprotein(a) levels, apo(a) KIV-2 repeats, and LPA SNPs and imaging characteristics.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) was associated with presence of lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00; 1.15), thin-or-ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC) (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01; 1.14), and degree of stenosis (β = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.00; 0.88). In women, lipoprotein(a) was associated with presence of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06; 1.61). In men, lipoprotein(a) was associated with degree of stenosis (β = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.04; 1.12). Rs10455872 was significantly associated with increased calcification volume (β = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.25; 1.89) and absence of plaque ulceration (aOR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.04; 0.93). T3888P was associated with absence of LRNC (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.16; 0.78) and smaller maximum vessel wall area (β = -10.24, 95%CI: -19.03; -1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, increased lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with degree of stenosis, and IPH, LRNC, and TRFC, known as vulnerable plaque characteristics, in the carotid artery. T3888P was associated with lower LRNC prevalence and smaller maximum vessel wall area. Further research in larger study populations is needed to confirm these results.

Elevated Lp(a) (Lipoprotein[a]) Levels Increase Risk of 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Following Carotid Endarterectomy

Background and Purpose:

General population studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) levels are an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease and subsequent cardiovascular events. The role of Lp(a) for the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is unknown. Our objective is to assess the association of elevated Lp(a) levels with the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing CEA.

Methods:

Lp(a) concentrations were determined in preoperative blood samples of 944 consecutive patients with CEA included in the Athero-Express Biobank Study. During 3-year follow-up, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death, were documented.

Results:

After 3 years follow-up, Kaplan-Meier cumulative event rates for MACE were 15.4% in patients with high Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) and 10.2% in patients with low Lp(a) levels (≤137 nmol/L; ≤80th cohort percentile; log-rank test: P =0.047). Cox regression analyses adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors revealed a significant association between high Lp(a) levels and 3-year MACE with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.07–2.66). One-third of MACE occurred within 30 days after CEA, with an adjusted hazard ratio for the 30-day risk of MACE of 2.05 (95% CI, 1.01–4.17). Kaplan-Meier curves from time point 30 days to 3 years onward revealed no significant association between high Lp(a) levels and MACE. Lp(a) levels were not associated with histological carotid plaque characteristics.

Conclusions:

High Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) are associated with an increased risk of 30-day MACE after CEA. This identifies elevated Lp(a) levels as a new potential risk factor for secondary cardiovascular events in patients after carotid surgery. Future studies are required to investigate whether Lp(a) levels might be useful in guiding treatment algorithms for carotid intervention.

Elevated circulating metalloproteinase 7 predicts recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with carotid stenosis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Major adverse cardiovascular events are the main cause of morbidity and mortality over the long term in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. There are few reports assessing the prognostic value of markers of inflammation in relation to the risk of cardiovascular disease after carotid endarterectomy. Here, we aimed to determine whether matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and MMP-10), tissue inhibitor of MMPs (TIMP-1) and in vivo inflammation studied by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT predict recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with carotid stenosis who underwent endarterectomy.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was carried out on 31 consecutive patients with symptomatic (23/31) or asymptomatic (8/31) severe (> 70%) carotid stenosis who were scheduled for carotid endarterectomy between July 2013 and March 2016. In addition, 26 healthy controls were included in the study. Plasma and serum samples were collected 2 days prior to surgery and tested for MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, MMP-10, TIMP-1, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT focusing on several territories' vascular wall metabolism was performed on 29 of the patients because of no presurgical availability in 2 symptomatic patients. Histological and immunohistochemical studies were performed with antibodies targeting MMP-10, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and CD68.

RESULTS

The patients with carotid stenosis had significantly more circulating MMP-1, MMP-7 and MMP-10 than the healthy controls. Intraplaque TIMP-1 was correlated with its plasma level (r = 0.42 P = .02) and with ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (r = 0.38 P = .05). We did not find any correlation between circulating MMPs and in vivo carotid plaque metabolism assessed by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET. After a median follow-up of 1077 days, 4 cerebrovascular, 7 cardiovascular and 11 peripheral vascular events requiring hospitalization were registered. Circulating MMP-7 was capable of predicting events over and above the traditional risk factors (HR = 1.15 P = .006). When the model was associated with the variables of interest, the risk predicted by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating MMP-7 may represent a novel marker for recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis. MMP-7 may reflect the atherosclerotic burden but not plaque inflammation in this specific vascular territory.

Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism?

The structural similarity with plasminogen as well as thrombogenic and atherogenic in vitro functions raise the question if lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and ischemic stroke. Numerous case-control and prospective studies using different cut-off values to define high Lp(a) generated conflicting evidence for both VTE and ischemic stroke. Several meta-analyses demonstrated independent associations of elevated Lp(a) with a history of VTE or ischemic stroke. However, the evidence of prospective studies for associations of Lp(a) with incident stroke or recurrent VTE remains inconclusive. For ischemic stroke, data suggest that Lp(a) increases the risk of large-artery atherosclerosis stroke, but not cardioembolic or lacunar stroke. Lp(a) may increase the risk of VTE in the presence of additional thrombophilic risk factors. Larger cohort studies are needed to elaborate the importance of higher Lp(a) cut-offs and interactions with other risk factors and subgroups of stroke or VTE. The value of Lp(a) to estimate residual vascular risk after the first thromboembolic event remains to be adequately explored.

Risk factors of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score

The risk of thromboembolism in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 to 1 was low, and the anticoagulant therapy was not recommended. Although the CHA2DS2-VASc score was low, there were still many patients suffered from thrombotic events and stroke. We aim to investigate the risk factors of thrombotic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score.We retrospectively enrolled 595 consecutive NVAF patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score (male: CHA2DS2-VASc = 0, female: CHA2DS2-VASc = 1). The general clinical data, blood biochemical data, and echocardiography results of the 595 patients were collected. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate risk factors of thrombosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the optimal cut-off value of the independent risk factors. A P value of <.05 (2-sided) was considered to be statistically significant.In multivariate analysis, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) plasma level and left atrium diameter (LAD) were positively related to thromboembolism in NVAF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 to 1 after adjustment for age, gender, and other variables (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03; OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.18). Lp(a) exerted a significant predictive value with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.68, P < .01). The optimal cut-off value for Lp(a) predicting thrombotic events was 27.2 mg/dL (sensitivity 45.7%, specificity 73.4%). LAD showed a significant predictive value with AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78, P < .01). The optimal cut-off point for LAD predicting thrombotic events was 43.5 mm (sensitivity 47.1%, specificity 85.8%).High Lp(a) plasma level and left atrial dilatation might be independent risk factors of thrombotic events for NVAF patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Lipoprotein (a) levels and outcomes in stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although genetic and epidemiological studies support that people with high lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are at an increased risk for arterial disease, its prognostic value in patients with established artery disease has not been consistently evaluated.

METHODS

FRENA is a prospective registry of consecutive outpatients with coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral artery disease. We assessed the risk for subsequent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or limb amputation according to Lp(a) levels at baseline.

RESULTS

As of December 2016, 1503 stable outpatients were recruited. Of these, 814 (54%) had levels <30 mg/dL, 319 (21%) had 30-50 mg/dL and 370 (25%) had ≥50 mg/dL. Over a mean follow-up of 36 months, 294 patients developed subsequent events (myocardial infarction 122, ischemic stroke 114, limb amputation 58) and 85 died. On multivariable analysis, patients with Lp(a) levels of 30-50 mg/dL were at a higher risk for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.67; 95%CI: 2.77-7.85), ischemic stroke (HR: 8.27; 95%CI: 4.14-16.5) or limb amputation (HR: 3.18; 95%CI: 1.36-7.44) than those with normal levels. Moreover, patients with levels ≥50 mg/dL were at increased risk for myocardial infarction (HR: 19.5; 95%CI: 10.5-36.1), ischemic stroke (HR: 54.5; 95%CI: 25.4-116.7) or limb amputation (HR: 22.7; 95%CI: 9.38-54.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease and Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL were at a 5-fold higher risk for subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke or limb amputation. Those with levels >50 mg/dL were at an over 10-fold higher risk.

Serum lipoprotein (a) predicts acute coronary syndromes in patients with severe carotid stenosis

BACKGROUND

Different cut-off values of serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] were recently identified to better stratify cardiovascular risk categories. Both pathophysiological and prognostic values of Lp (a) remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, the prognostic value of Lp (a) and its correlation with intraplaque features were assessed in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing endarterectomy (n = 180). The cut-off value of 10 mg/dL for serum Lp (a) was selected to predict 24-month follow-up acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In addition, the association between serum Lp (a) and intraplaque lipids, collagen, inflammatory and vascular cells was assessed. Serum Lp (a) levels were measured by nephelometric assay.

RESULTS

Patients with high Lp (a) had similar comorbidities, medications and laboratory parameters as compared to low Lp (a) levels. At 24-month follow-up, patients with high Lp (a) had more ACS as compared to low levels. Histological parameters within plaques were comparable in the study groups. No significant correlation between Lp (a) serum levels and intraplaque parameters was found, except for a weak positive association with smooth muscle cells in upstream plaque portions. When adjusted for gender, the presence of dyslipidaemia and chronic coronary artery disease, Lp (a) ≥10 mg/dL remained predictive for ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp (a) determination could be a useful tool to predict ACS in patients with severe carotid stenosis.

Association Between Serum Lipoprotein(a) and Diabetic Retinopathy in Han Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Contrasting observations have been made on the relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

OBJECTIVE

To measure serum Lp(a) concentrations in patients with T2D to investigate whether Lp(a) affects risk for DR.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Serum Lp(a) was determined in 377 Han Chinese patients with T2D. Demographic and clinical information, including presence of DR and vision-threatening DR (VTDR), were collected on admission. The relationship between serum Lp(a) and DR or VTDR was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with DR or VTDR had significantly higher serum Lp(a) concentrations on admission (P < 0.001). The distribution across Lp(a) quartiles ranged from 11.7% (DR) and 4.3% (VTDR) in the first quartile to 47.9% (DR) and 19.1% (VTDR) in the fourth quartile (P for trend < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for common DR and VTDR risk factors showed that the third and fourth Lp(a) quartiles were significantly associated with DR and VTDR compared with the first Lp(a) quartile (P < 0.001). The patient group with highest concentrations of both Lp(a) (fourth quartile) and hemoglobin A1c (≥7%) had an odds ratio for DR of 5.15 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.78 to 9.55; P < 0.001] and for VTDR of 5.32 (95% CI, 2.92 to 10.15; P < 0.001) compared with patients with lower concentrations of both factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) concentration was independently associated with DR in patients with T2D. More frequent retinal examinations should be recommended for patients with T2D and high Lp(a) concentrations.