Risk Factors for Severe Residual Headache in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

Post cerebral venous thrombosis headache - Prevalence, mechanisms and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Headache after cerebral venous thrombosis (post-CVT headache [PCH]) is a common complaint during follow-up. Risk factors and their pathophysiology are not well known. We studied PCH prevalence in CVT patients, its pathophysiology, and possible risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital between 2006 and 2019 with CVT and at least one follow-up appointment. We diagnosed PCH when patients reported headaches during the follow-up visit. Recanalization was retrospectively assessed by two neuroradiologists using the first available follow-up MRI/ MRV, and the PRIORITy-CVT study classification.

RESULTS

Of 131 patients, sixty (60/131, 45.8 %) reported PCH at the 3-month follow-up. Of these PCH, 9 had previous migraine (9/60, 5.0 %) and 13 previous tension-type headaches (13/60, 21.6 %), before CVT. Forty-four (44/60, 73.3 %) PCH patients had de novo headache: 21 (21/60, 35.0 %) de novo tension-type headaches; 6 (6/60, 10.0 %) de novo migraine; 6 [(6/60, 10.0 %) secondary headache disorders: 3 due to dural arteriovenous fistula, 2 due to intracranial hypertension, and 1 recurrent CVT], and 11 other headache types. Most patients had at least partial recanalization, with no difference in PCH frequency amongst recanalization subgroups (p = 0.598). Premorbid depression (p = 0.009, OR 7.9, 95 % CI 1.6-31.4) increased the odds ratio of PCH, while superior sagittal sinus thrombosis (p = 0.005, OR 0.15, 95 % CI 0.03-0.56) decreased it.

DISCUSSION

Our study shows that PCH is a common finding after CVT and elucidates potential risk factors. PCH is common in patients with previous or de novo primary headache. In PCH patients without previous headache, secondary causes of headache, namely related to CVT complications, should be excluded. PCH is also increased in patients with premorbid depression. There was no statistically significant difference in PCH amongst the PRIORITy-CVT recanalization subgroups, but most patients had at least partial recanalization.

A novel score to estimate thrombus burden and predict intracranial hypertension in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Current methods to evaluate the severity of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) lack patient-specific indexes. Herein, a novel scoring method was investigated to estimate the thrombus burden and the intracranial pressure (ICP) of CVST.

METHODS

In this retrospective study from January 2019 through December 2021, we consecutively enrolled patients with a first-time confirmed diagnosis of CVST by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography (CE-MRV) or computed tomography venography (CTV). In these patients, a comprehensive CVST-Score was established using magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging (MRBTI) to estimate the thrombus burden semi-quantitatively. The relationship between CVST-Score and ICP was explored to assess the potential of using the CVST-score to evaluate ICP noninvasively and dynamically.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included in the final analysis. The CVST-Scores in different ICP subgroups were as follows: 4.29±2.87 in ICP<250mmH₂O subgroup, 11.36±3.86 in ICP =250-330mmH₂O subgroup and 14.99±3.15 in ICP>330mmH₂O subgroup, respectively (p<0.001). For patients with ICP ≤330mmH₂O, the CVST-Score was linearly and positively correlated with ICP (R²=0.53). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed the optimal CVST-Score cut-off values to predict ICP ≥250mmH₂O and >330mmH₂O were 7.15 and 11.62, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated CVST-Score as an independent predictor of ICP ≥250mmH₂O (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-3.10; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple and noninvasive CVST-Score can rapidly estimate the thrombus burden and predict the severity of intracranial hypertension in patients with CVST. The CVST-Score can aid in evaluating therapeutic responses and avoiding unnecessary invasive procedures at long-term follow-up.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (ACTION-CVT): A Multicenter International Study

BACKGROUND

A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort.

METHODS

This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups.

RESULTS

Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140-720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51-1.73]; P=0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22-2.76]; P=0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48-1.73]; P=0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.82]; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Updates in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

Purpose of Review

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke that most commonly affects younger women. Here, we review new literature relevant to the management and prognosis of individuals with CVT and ongoing areas of uncertainty.

Recent Findings

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly integrated into routine care but are not yet recommended by guidelines. Recent randomized clinical trials and available case series offer reassuring safety data. Routine use of endovascular therapy is not associated with improved outcomes. The relationship between recanalization and prognosis is uncertain.

Summary

The evidence base for management of CVT continues to improve. Ongoing areas of uncertainty include duration of therapy and whether certain subgroups of patients may benefit from neurointervention or personalized approaches to antithrombotic strategy. The state of knowledge will continue to benefit from large collaborative international efforts, and integration of patient partnerships to identify research priorities.